How Did Dinosaurs Evolve Into Birds?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ส.ค. 2014
  • Dinosaurs evolved over millions of years into the modern birds we see today! How did such large creatures become so small? Trace is here to tell you the answer.
    Follow DNews on Twitter: / dnews
    Follow Trace on Twitter: / tracedominguez
    Read More:
    Getting Small the Key for Dinos that Became Birds
    news.discovery.com/animals/din...
    “How did some dinosaurs go from being impossibly huge, Earth-bound creatures to winged masters of the sky?”
    How dinosaurs shrank, survived and evolved into birds
    phys.org/news/2014-08-dinosaur...
    “That starling at your birdfeeder? It is a dinosaur. The chicken on your dinner plate? Also a dinosaur.”
    Which dinosaurs survived? The ones that shrank the fastest
    www.washingtonpost.com/news/sp...
    “If almost all dinosaurs had feathers, as recent studies have indicated, what determined which ones would evolve into birds?”
    New study suggests that any kind of dinosaur could have feathers, not just birds
    www.washingtonpost.com/nationa...
    “It’s possible that all dinosaurs had feathers. Scientists previously believed that only avian dinosaurs - that is, the direct ancestors of our modern birds - sported feathers along with their scales.”
    Shrinking dinosaurs evolved into flying birds (w/ Video)
    phys.org/news/2014-07-dinosaur...
    “A new study involving scientists from the University of Southampton has revealed how massive, meat-eating, ground-dwelling dinosaurs evolved into agile flying birds: they just kept shrinking and shrinking, for over 50 million years.”
    Honey, who shrunk the dinosaurs? Study traces dinosaur evolution into early birds
    www.foxnews.com/science/2014/0...
    “Scientists have mapped how a group of fearsome, massive dinosaurs evolved and shrank to the likes of robins and hummingbirds.”
    Why did mammals survive the ‘K/T extinction’?
    www.sciencedaily.com/releases/...
    “Picture a dinosaur. Huge, menacing creatures, they ruled the Earth for nearly 200 million years, striking fear with every ground-shaking stride.”
    Watch More:
    The Next Mass Extinction
    • Is The Next Mass Extin...
    TestTube Wild Card
    testtube.com/dnews/dnews-440-s...
    Are Pesticides Killing Birds?
    • The Reason Pesticides ...
    ____________________
    DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos twice daily.
    Watch More DNews on TestTube testtube.com/dnews
    Subscribe now! th-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
    DNews on Twitter / dnews
    Trace Dominguez on Twitter / tracedominguez
    Tara Long on Twitter / taralongest
    Laci Green on Twitter / gogreen18
    DNews on Facebook / discoverynews
    DNews on Google+ gplus.to/dnews
    Discovery News discoverynews.com
    Download the TestTube App: testu.be/1ndmmMq
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 4.1K

  • @CyFiM
    @CyFiM 7 ปีที่แล้ว +693

    Dinosaurs evolve, become the most diverse group of terrestrial vertebrates on the planet, and are then almost entirely wiped out except for a single lineage (or rather three closely related lineages) that then quickly expand to become the most diverse group of terrestrial vertebrates on the planet once again, because you can't stop a dinosaur from being awesome.

    • @funnyspeardragon5735
      @funnyspeardragon5735 7 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      That my friend, is true

    • @zylzyl3823
      @zylzyl3823 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Archaeoraptor liaoningensis
      When National Geographic published the first pictures of a fossil creature that looked for all the world like a bird-dinosaur, it was hailed as a stunning coup. But now the creature has been exposed as a hoax--the latest in a series of embarrassing reversals in evidence for evolutionary theory.

    • @funnyspeardragon5735
      @funnyspeardragon5735 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ...

    • @CyFiM
      @CyFiM 7 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Boy, it's a good thing Timothy Rowe, Phin Currie, and Xu Xing, paleontologists, familiar with evolutionary biology, who were listed as co-authors on the paper that described "Archaeoraptor," determined that the specimen was actually a composite of Yanornis, a bird with clawed fingers on its wings, and Microraptor, a dinosaur closely related to Velociraptor, which had birdlike wing feathers on all four of its limbs which were clearly adapted for gliding (also described by Xu Xing), which had been cemented together by the farmer who discovered it before it was illegally sold to enhance its value, and also that the paper that it was rejected from the scientific journal, "Nature," and the press release was only distributed in the popular magazine, National Geographic, and not an actual, formal journal. Stephen Czercas, the main author of the paper, admitted that he had made, quote, "an idiot, bone-stupid mistake." It's a good thing we have hundreds of specimens of Microraptor, as well as other genera like Anchiornis, Confusciusornis, Sinornithosaurus, Zhenyuanlong, Archaeopteryx, of course, and many, many others, which fill in basically every step between small nonavian theropods and modern birds, to the point where "bird" has become a meaningless informal word and we actually have no idea where "dinosaurs" end and "birds" begin anymore. We confuse avialans for troodontids and dromaeosaurids for avialans all the time. That's how seamless the fossil record between these groups is. Gosh, I'm so glad we figured out that "Archaeoraptor" was a composite, otherwise that would have been really confusing, right?

    • @funnyspeardragon5735
      @funnyspeardragon5735 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Right, an old friend of mine was an archaeoraptor, the last time i saw him was 2 years ago.

  • @davidmcmillon5963
    @davidmcmillon5963 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1460

    Is that why some chicken nuggets are shaped like dinosaurs? Did we always subconsciously know this?

  • @jonjontown
    @jonjontown 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1057

    I wonder if T-Rex meat tasted like chicken? lol

    • @xBaphometHx
      @xBaphometHx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +112

      I bet it did.

    • @nguyenphuong287
      @nguyenphuong287 7 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Go back and try to it flesh

    • @stubee52
      @stubee52 7 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      Florida chicken, alligator steaks.

    • @mayleecao3063
      @mayleecao3063 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I don't think that's how evolution works. T-Rex probably evolved into a larger and much heavier bird which has now been extinct for hundreds of years due to human activity.

    • @xBaphometHx
      @xBaphometHx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      Maylee Cao the T-Rex got extinct way before that.
      Other dinosaurs evolved into birds, and they were also theropods.

  • @rexmagi4606
    @rexmagi4606 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    T Rex dying in the asteroid impact to all the tiny therapods: "Fly, you fools!"

  • @mike62401
    @mike62401 6 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    My mini-dinosaur, called a parrot, talks to me every day. Not only did dinosaurs miniaturize, but they also evolved 4 chamber hearts and big brains. My companion parrot loves his human companion in today’s modern world. Imagine, what non-avian dinos would have evolved to, along with small, diminutive mammals. Pretty fascinating to say the least.

    • @BierBart12
      @BierBart12 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Imagine if, instead of mammals evolving giraffes, thinner sauropods evolved into their niche

    • @goldeneagleeagle7240
      @goldeneagleeagle7240 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Extinct not extont

  • @mrmister1657
    @mrmister1657 5 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    So what your saying is when I’m eating dinosaur chicken nuggets I actually am eating dinosaurs

  • @thedarkringedfox9998
    @thedarkringedfox9998 8 ปีที่แล้ว +277

    birds went from monstrous creatures to cute small feathery creatures

    • @thedarkringedfox9998
      @thedarkringedfox9998 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Karina Jimenez Chable what

    • @thedarkringedfox9998
      @thedarkringedfox9998 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** i know that

    • @admiralcat3809
      @admiralcat3809 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      dinosaurs are not monsters

    • @raptormage2209
      @raptormage2209 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      welp i don't find dinosaurs that scary

    • @jimijamesjowitt
      @jimijamesjowitt 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      People just ate the big ones first because they were easier to catch and more meat.

  • @naastione
    @naastione 8 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Kentucky Fried Dinosaur.

    • @gianne9141
      @gianne9141 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      KFD

    • @evancabralsilva93
      @evancabralsilva93 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Kentucky fried dick

    • @petewingnut6827
      @petewingnut6827 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'll have a drumstick & that'll do for the next year or so......

  • @samrizzardi2213
    @samrizzardi2213 8 ปีที่แล้ว +363

    Birds are dinosaurs in the same way that bats are mammals.
    Basically, imagine that a meteor wipes out all mammals except bats, and they're discovered by aliens. Would it make sense for them to say that bats are "descended" from mammals, or that they *are* mammals?

    • @dundee6402
      @dundee6402 8 ปีที่แล้ว +82

      That's a pretty smart comparison, I actually think whales and dolphins are a better comparison since it's suprising to discovered they share the same ancestors with other mammals.

    • @meghanpierce5375
      @meghanpierce5375 8 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      +sam rizzardi Cladistics is weird. Birds are reptiles, and so are mammals... technically. Reptiles are amphibians... Amphibians are fish. We have tried to group animals by characteristics, but cladistics says "screw that".

    • @Pssybart
      @Pssybart 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Well, there's a difference between monophyletic and paraphyiletic clades. Paraphiletyc clades emphasize characteristics of a group of animals while monoplyletic clades are based on one single ancestry with different branches. 'Fish' is a paraphyletic word since it excludes all terrestial animals that descended from fish.

    • @meghanpierce5375
      @meghanpierce5375 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Sandro Algra Barradas So wouldn't reptile also be a paraphyletic word?
      Also, I was reading more about mammals and if they were ever reptiles. That's... a weird discussion too. It seems that they evolved from things that were not quite reptiles but were past being amphibians.

    • @Pssybart
      @Pssybart 8 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Meghan Pierce
      That depends on how the word reptile is used. If you make a clear dintinction between reptiles and birds... then yes, you're using the word in a paraphyletic way. But 'reptilia' is also used as an official taxonomic name. It includes all animals that belong to the family of 'true reptiles'. This includes dinosaurs and therefore birds. So taxonomically speaking birds are also reptiles.
      Mammals are not reptiles. Although our ancestors were at some point very reptilian in appearance, they weren't true reptiles. Mammals belong to a group called the synapsids while reptiles belong to a group called the sauropsids. But both groups do belong to a larger family called the amniotes.

  • @derekbryceson7080
    @derekbryceson7080 7 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    1:08 Gotta hate that moment when all your feathers fall off and your foot sinks into the ground.

    • @funnyspeardragon5735
      @funnyspeardragon5735 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol

    • @RealDexterMidnight
      @RealDexterMidnight 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      OH f**

    • @RealDexterMidnight
      @RealDexterMidnight 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry VelociraptorGamer_yt account has been deleted for violating the rules
      Here is the proof
      "OH f**"
      date July 3 2019
      Time 7:43
      Gender: male
      Place he lives:**censord**
      Please not we not cuss on TH-cam
      How long July 3 3019

    • @xami926
      @xami926 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RealDexterMidnight bruh

  • @karencorrea4581
    @karencorrea4581 5 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Yes!!!!! I have chickens and I always thought they looked like tiny dinosaurs! Also my rooster makes a strange dinosaur-like noise

  • @russiandog0732
    @russiandog0732 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    There is so much ignorance in this comment section denying evolution.

  • @RandomCzechDude
    @RandomCzechDude ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love Dinosaurs, both modern day and prehistoric.

  • @fordhouse8b
    @fordhouse8b 10 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I remember hearing about the whole dinosaur to bird idea in some freshmen college class, way back in the fall of 1989. Back then, if I recall correctly, my professor was telling us about recently studied similarities in the anatomical vocal structures used by both birds and dinosaurs. Also about evidence indicating possible/probable warm-bloodedness in dinosaurs?

    • @xxcelr8rs
      @xxcelr8rs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Birds evolved. That is crazy talk. Sprouted wings one day and were breeding gold to the girls. That is hilarious. Only colleges in the last 50 years can talk brazenly stupid. Even college is proof of de evolution.

  • @MatthewLedZepfan
    @MatthewLedZepfan 8 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    0:25 lol at first I thought he was gonna say big ass extinction

  • @secondghost
    @secondghost 9 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    How did dinosaurs evolve into birds? The important question is, how to we reverse the process to the point where we can ride a Velociraptor to work or the grocery store?

    • @RJPalmer
      @RJPalmer 9 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      A velociraptor is about 2 feet tall. Unless you are infant you would likely crush it.

    • @sst-rex245
      @sst-rex245 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Umm birds do have scales look on there feet

    • @deepocean9471
      @deepocean9471 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It is true that birds came from dinosaurs. But not from all. Only a clade known as Maniraptora, which includes oviraptor, velociraptor etc, evolved into birds. There are many other dinosaur clades,tribes and families such as Marginocephalia(Triceratops), Sauropoda(Brachiosaurus) and Tyrannosauridae(Tyrannosaurus), that were ultimately gone extinct. From Maniraptora evolved species like protarcheopteryx and archeopteryx, the first birds. What i want to point out is that, you can't say dinosaurs are still alive, because the only living dinosaur class at the end of Cretaceous evolved into the first bird class (Ave). It is like saying that since there are cats, smilodons still exist.

    • @Irritator
      @Irritator 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      AnimalLover Dinosaurs with scales? Did Jurassic Fart teach you that like it taught you the Velociraptor's size? Of course some dinosaurs didn't live in herds, because not all dinosaurs evolved to birds. The Velociraptor is the closest thing you get to a bird, as Dromaeosaurids branch off the group that contains such creatures as Archeopteryx. Different toes? Sorry to shit on your comment, but a T-Rex foot is shaped EXACTLY like a chicken foot, one longer finger in the middle, two similar fingers and a weak toe on the back. Chickens develop teeth to pluck out insects? Then why don't they grow them normally? Chickens pluck out insects a lot of the time. And OF COURSE birds will look drastically different from dinosaurs idiot, it's 65 million years of evolution, 10 mil. years less than it took primates to appear and form into man.
      And before you cry out "bullshit" and "conspiracy", here are some sources and images:
      www.google.rs/search?q=raptor+size&rlz=1C1PRFE_enRS604RS604&es_sm=122&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=08o_Va31D4TU7AabtYDYBw&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1920&bih=955#imgrc=CRvNrwDdef68lM%253A%3BF5CPy5GSCugCIM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fstatic3.fjcdn.com%252Fcomments%252Fnah%252Butahraptor%252Bway%252Bbigger%252Bthan%252Ba%252Bvelociraptor%252B_b186e3b34e7fc4d9aa5d42286f6c771f.png%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.giantitp.com%252Fforums%252Fshowthread.php%253F299694-(3-X)-Help-with-a-velociraptor-PC%3B800%3B331
      www.google.rs/search?q=feathered+dinosaur+fossils&rlz=1C1PRFE_enRS604RS604&es_sm=122&biw=1920&bih=955&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=DMs_VYPQLMLU7Aa5loHYCw&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ#imgrc=S272B3TfRLqMDM%253A%3BixrjSUcy6Q7HbM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fmewarnai.us%252Fimages%252F449491-feathered-dinosaur-fossils.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fmewarnai.us%252F449491-feathered-dinosaur-fossils%3B600%3B447
      www.google.rs/search?q=feathered+dinosaur+fossils&rlz=1C1PRFE_enRS604RS604&es_sm=122&biw=1920&bih=955&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=DMs_VYPQLMLU7Aa5loHYCw&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ#tbm=isch&q=archeopteryx+tree&imgrc=yDN6vj4NApyPHM%253A%3B176ScindNLdZpM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fevolution.berkeley.edu%252Fevolibrary%252Fimages%252Fevograms%252Fbird_evo.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fevolution.berkeley.edu%252Fevolibrary%252Farticle%252Fevograms_06%3B525%3B610

    • @Irritator
      @Irritator 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      AnimalLover Dud you read my whole comment? SIXTY-FIVE MILLION years of evolution.

  • @fredbitzaya1003
    @fredbitzaya1003 8 ปีที่แล้ว +120

    Diplodocus lived in the jurassic period it would never face the CT extinction event.

    • @BearDrivingACar
      @BearDrivingACar 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Thank god them saying that annoyed me so much. Thanks for saying this

    • @emanuelb.2559
      @emanuelb.2559 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      ok

    • @jimijamesjowitt
      @jimijamesjowitt 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Na I found one last week.

    • @dundee6402
      @dundee6402 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      fred bitzaya In fact we live closer to the CT extinction than Diplodocus did

    • @andrewgan557
      @andrewgan557 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      fred bitzaya yup.

  • @MellonVegan
    @MellonVegan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Theropods aren't a family of dinosaurs but a suborder. I know it's nitpicky but I just had to point that out :D

    • @aliblis2347
      @aliblis2347 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      *Theropods are certainly a family of dinosaurs.*

    • @meixangej
      @meixangej 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Word

    • @karlhans6678
      @karlhans6678 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@primordialprose8093 im confused now, are they dinos or not?

    • @megsterbbb
      @megsterbbb 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@primordialprose8093 They don't matter to you but they do matter to scientists. There's a lot of species and related species to sort through

    • @archive2500
      @archive2500 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@primordialprose8093 True. The positioning of clades are important but these naming of ranks are not. I started to realize that when finding out that bird is not a seperate lineage to reptiles and "class" is just meaningless. Like what makes a "class" a "class"? It is just a named clade.

  • @theyellowpeddledflowers4368
    @theyellowpeddledflowers4368 8 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    I have dinosaurs in my backyard there called chicknosauroses

    • @beardiegaming1952
      @beardiegaming1952 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      no, they should be caled gallosaurus beacaus gallus gallus is the chickens scientific name

    • @earthmamafl9308
      @earthmamafl9308 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ClickerMase TV lol I have some chicknosauroses roaming my back yard

    • @aliblis2347
      @aliblis2347 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      *Chickentosaurus*

    • @dustyviers00
      @dustyviers00 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @LegoGuy87 I believe so it's not a old world I think only like 700 years old so........ It'd make sense

    • @bapples1233
      @bapples1233 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      LoOK aT AlL THoSe ChiCkeNs

  • @jackhandma1011
    @jackhandma1011 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Some places to find dead dinosurs:
    1. Museum
    2. KFC

  • @raspberry_gamez6977
    @raspberry_gamez6977 10 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Who needs a Turkey dinner when you could have a t-Rex dinner

    • @letsgetthisoverwith
      @letsgetthisoverwith 10 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Nia LaLa I have a brain and have health issues and was ordered by my doc to eat meat because of said issues. Usually a smaller stake or chicken breast with the occasional fish thrown in for good measure. You can be vegan or vegetarian all you like, just don't be a bitch about it.

    • @Tamizushi
      @Tamizushi 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      letsgetthisoverwith Please don't take it the wrong way, but while I do know of some health problems which could be helped by eating meat, I don't know of any which would actually require you to.

    • @Tamizushi
      @Tamizushi 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** What's ironic about this argument is that you can't make it without being judgmental yourself.

    • @Tamizushi
      @Tamizushi 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nia LaLa Actually, vegetarians are still a small minority and there are lot of people who eat meat and who happen to be very smart, even though I agree with you that they are wrong to do it.

    • @calypso1985
      @calypso1985 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh I'm sorry but were do u get your animal proteins from? Pills, still animals.

  • @mcgrathbissaillon2689
    @mcgrathbissaillon2689 10 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I have always wondered how fast a species could stunt their growth... Or like how fast a species could go from being big to small and still be a relatively healthy species?

  • @mapofthesoultagme7143
    @mapofthesoultagme7143 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When a bird walks or runs, I think that looks like a dinosaur running, from certain angles

    • @AgroAcro
      @AgroAcro 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Someone once attached a piece of wood to their tail to mimic a non-avian dinosaur tail, and it made them walk even more dinosaur like.

  • @FeatherineFeather
    @FeatherineFeather 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Me: *eating chicken, moment of realization*... holy crap....Im eating a trex

  • @YarbroK
    @YarbroK 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    While you have a lot of things right, I do want to point out that dinosaurs that directly evolved into birds did not shrink. From the Triassic to the KT event, they were always been small, no bigger than a house cat.

  • @funnyspeardragon5735
    @funnyspeardragon5735 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    0:12
    Im a dilophosaurus, not a raptor
    IM TRIGGERED

  • @kissmytunatuna9043
    @kissmytunatuna9043 8 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    why did the dinosaur cross the road ?

    • @-OhNo_OhNo_OhNo-
      @-OhNo_OhNo_OhNo- 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +james tre cause it ran from kfd

    • @khango6006
      @khango6006 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Angel Dunbar Because aint nobody got time for tiny little cars

    • @houssam19941
      @houssam19941 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      to become a chicken

    • @thegallus--3556
      @thegallus--3556 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      To escape from humans......and their bullshit.

  • @laletemanolete
    @laletemanolete 9 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    When I see ravens, I see raptors!

  • @PinGsamY
    @PinGsamY 9 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    1:35-1:39
    "Less body means less to take care of, means survival."
    Then why we needed to grow bigger than our ancestral forms, bacteria?

    • @bamfyfe
      @bamfyfe 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      PinGsamY Those are just words we invented, we love to play and we play with words too, dont take words to serious. The universe doesn´t work in our language : x So it´s just a word play not a rule of the universe : D

    • @robinchwan
      @robinchwan 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      PinGsamY because coming together making it easier to survive = good.. apparantly coming together past the form of bacteria was really beneficial... kill the other guys that has more food then ourselves,,,, or just create a new source of food.. bacteria (the cells themselves eating eachother means there is more food around meaning more energy to waste making better versions of future you! i'm sorry it's hard to explain... basically.... bacteria found that killing family = food... the food then evolved into eating previous family... then they evolved to eat the first evolution! the race went on!....

    • @soulplexis
      @soulplexis 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because that never happened

    • @soulplexis
      @soulplexis 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      sure it did and im riding an ice dragon who's spitting out rainbow ghosts

    • @KinguCooky
      @KinguCooky 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Soulplexxis Watch out for talking snakes and giants.

  • @briantaylor2249
    @briantaylor2249 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Not "all" dinosaurs had feathers. It's speculated that almost all avian-dinosaurs (theropods) had feathers but the non-avian like sauropods (longneck), ceratopsian (like triceratops), Iguanadon and most quadrupedal dinosaurs would have had the rough leather/scaled skin

    • @HUNTERSDREAM
      @HUNTERSDREAM 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There's also Carnotaurus, a theropod that has scales instead of feather, and almost snake-like jaws.

    • @gibsonflyingv2820
      @gibsonflyingv2820 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You should read more news.. new study shows dinosaurs has scales. Not feathers.

    • @llSuperSnivyll
      @llSuperSnivyll 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      To be more clear on the subject, some dinosaurs only had scales, some dinosaurs only had feathers, and others (including BIRDS) have both.

    • @aliblis2347
      @aliblis2347 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gibsonflyingv2820 you're right

    • @gringoguapo
      @gringoguapo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes thank you finally! The argument that ALL dinosaurs had feathers is stupid. Yes a lot of dinosaurs had feathers, but only scale impressions have been found with the t rex, triceratops, stegasourus, brachiosaurus, etc

  • @RealSameerRaza
    @RealSameerRaza 8 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    see the living bird cassowary, you'll believe dinosaurs existed and were related to birds

    • @GrowingDownUnder
      @GrowingDownUnder 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      nope, I think they are more related to lizards. Look at flying species of lizards..they had wings too. Crocodiles & aligators basically haven't changed at all...and large monitor lizards and dragon lizards like the komodo dragon resemble more dinosaur like qualities than birds. Birds aren't the only animals capable of going underwater, so can reptiles!

    • @NewDBZuniverse0107
      @NewDBZuniverse0107 8 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Modern lizards and snakes are part of the family of animals called Lepidosaurs, a family of reptiles that split off from Archeosaurs like Crocodilians, Pteosaurs, and Dinosaurs. Dinosaurs and Crocodiles are part of the Thecodont branch of Archeosaurs.

    • @GrowingDownUnder
      @GrowingDownUnder 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ok makes sense now, cool thnx

    • @admiralcat3809
      @admiralcat3809 7 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      GrowingDownUnder dinosaurs are distantly related to lizards. dinosaurs never looked and looked nothing like lizards.

    • @jimijamesjowitt
      @jimijamesjowitt 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Emus are like dinosaur as it comes. Goats too. Look at their anatomy its crazy. Their eyes horns hooves. How do you just grow horns unless you always had them? I understand losing them through genetic errors. But gaining appendages or extra bits is a far stretch unless some gene splicing or cross breeding of species occurs. If evolution is a real thing then ADD kids are a new breed made to cope with the 100mph instant information sugar caffeine work to death life we have. But evolution can only make so much sense. With out some creatures in the food chain there is no food chain which means death. From mites and microbes to mammals and pachyderm things have been around longer than their remains are able to exist. There is no evidence of the mould under the sink once you clean it, even less if you rip it out put in a new sink and infinitely less once the old one has been in an incinerator or landfill. There cant be evidence of anything past a certain point as reality dictates the most you can get is a fossil which can easily be misconstrued confused damaged or destroyed. Sadly word of mouth and man made stories and myths have more evidence than reality itself. We outlive outlast and overcome through rebirth, the same as all of nature's creatures until we destroy them. We also seem to be the only creature on Earth capable of bringing them back. So that gives more credence to the God Theory. If we now have the power to create life and destoybit have we not become gods. Have we not proven the Gods right and we are able to be in their image on earth. That we have now gone full circle and created a virual reality inside our own reality which people are as gods even more so. Access to contact speak and be everywhere at any time, all information knowledge and everything at our will. But through interbreeding and even minor gene manipulation we have so far only had mutants not evolution. Cancer not a new appendage. Diseased rather than flourishing. But if we just did full gene editing we could have giants and monsters with human brains/minds. How is that any different than the original God stories? Not the made up a few thousand years back ones. The original story of the Gods made us from earth DNA found in the dirt. We are an extinct species reborn. That is why we didnt evolve. We were one of many types of bipedal creatures who had brains and families and mated with other bipedal creatures till we had a breed to kill off the others and survive this earth. Look at humans and then look at other animals etc. We have no offensive bits, no natural anything. Our teeth are mixed our bodies weak but able to become strong. We are pets.

  • @yasinmusse5723
    @yasinmusse5723 6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Dinosaurs taste so good!

    • @SandBox86
      @SandBox86 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      KFD.. Kentucky Fried Dino.. admit it.. it's awesome!!

    • @yasinmusse5723
      @yasinmusse5723 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SandBox86 yeah

    • @noobieeezdwm3621
      @noobieeezdwm3621 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dino nuggets

    • @archive2500
      @archive2500 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What is your preferred dino, chicken or turkey?

  • @Bingbongbarn
    @Bingbongbarn 10 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    T-Rex's lived at a time closer to humans than they did to stegosaurus

    • @wonkeeeeee
      @wonkeeeeee 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      who dosnt know that

    • @Sinulf
      @Sinulf 10 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      lilaolf you would be surprised.

    • @wonkeeeeee
      @wonkeeeeee 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Trisdino
      i knew it stupid

    • @Sinulf
      @Sinulf 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lilaolf I don't think you understood me..

    • @wonkeeeeee
      @wonkeeeeee 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Trisdino
      well who dosnt know it then?

  • @WobblesandBean
    @WobblesandBean 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have a pet web-footed dinosaur, and there are two unusually graceful, white, terrifyingly huge and aggressive dinosaurs that live in the lake behind my house.

    • @joshvswild949
      @joshvswild949 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Geese?

    • @WobblesandBean
      @WobblesandBean 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      aspiknf LOL yep, a duck and two swans. Geese got _nothing_ on swans, if you ever get to see one up close, that is not a bird. That is a bona fide dinosaur!

    • @StormsandSaugeye
      @StormsandSaugeye 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      I once had a few with exceptionally long tail feathers that did nothing ever.
      They made an awesome dinner.

    • @DFX2KX
      @DFX2KX 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Amelia Bee Those dinosuars in the lake? Their niche is being assholes, that's how they survive....

  • @SlyPz808
    @SlyPz808 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    True evolution:
    Dinosours to chickens to dinosour shapped chicken nuggets

  • @pbh9195
    @pbh9195 7 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    I know birds decend from dinosaurs, but im sick of the media stereotyping that they came from trex. true they came from the tharopod line but these evolution occurred long before trex. Auronis and later archeopterex skelotonwise looks like a dinosaur. then by the early cratatious birds have aready be fully formed with functional flapping wing instead of gliding wings like arche. by the time of the KT event birds have already takken the place of pterosaurs.

    • @vmdraco
      @vmdraco 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Someone finally fucking said it. That's a huge nitpick for me as well. T. rex wasn't involved in this idk why they keep mentioning it.

    • @Rotsuoy
      @Rotsuoy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I... don't recall him saying birds came from dinosaurs. I could have sworn he said birds came from theropods, one of type of which are the tyrannosaurids...

    • @DivineBanana
      @DivineBanana 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      they are cousins of t-rex, as were all other theropods!

    • @zylzyl3823
      @zylzyl3823 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** hahahahaaaa
      wow .... nice pic

    • @DivineBanana
      @DivineBanana 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      zyl zyl thanks lol

  • @markdstump
    @markdstump 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This guy's hair is evolving into feathers. :)

  • @sticktodrum
    @sticktodrum 10 ปีที่แล้ว +88

    Why is D News, a science channel, inappropriately using "theory" for the word "hypothesis"?

    • @nicolemiarey1689
      @nicolemiarey1689 10 ปีที่แล้ว +82

      Because evolution is not a hypothesis, it's a fact. :)

    • @SkateTutorials93
      @SkateTutorials93 10 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      nicole miarey lol Darwin's theory on evolution has a tonne of flaw's but its's the most accepted theory, nothing is fact lol

    • @blaze46waffle
      @blaze46waffle 10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      airman122469 Darwinian evolution is not a fact.

    • @SkateTutorials93
      @SkateTutorials93 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      You just answered it yourself, you mentioned two different things. How can it be the same? If it was all the same thing wouldnt it just be classified under the same title?

    • @airman122469
      @airman122469 10 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      blaze46waffle Who said anything about Darwin's version of the theory of evolution? Evolution is a scientific theory, arrived at by over 100 years of study. Darwinian evolution is not the complete theory, but it is a good starting place to explain evolution. Evolution happens all the time. Viruses, bacteria, drosophila (fruit flies), nematodes, and more, have all had observed speciation events. Evolution is a fact of non-perfect replicating systems. We can even simulate biological evolution with some relatively simple software. All it takes is a mutation rate and a fitness factor to select "most fit" individuals.

  • @shahsafwanmazhar249
    @shahsafwanmazhar249 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Me: Mom I don't wanna go to school today!!
    Mom: Why?
    Me: There are dinosaurs outside!!
    Mom: I'm tired of listening to this joke!!!!!

  • @AmarjeetSingh-pw9jx
    @AmarjeetSingh-pw9jx 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I couldn’t keep my eyes off his hair line 👀

    • @yvngtay4970
      @yvngtay4970 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      DAMNNNN😭

    • @clairmoon06
      @clairmoon06 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well thankyou so much, now I also got distracted XD

  • @henryscott370
    @henryscott370 8 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Birds *ARE* dinosaurs.... And no T.rex didn't evolve into a goddamn sparrow, thats not how it works. -___-

    • @joshuaalexander6404
      @joshuaalexander6404 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      he said small dinosaurs survived the mass extinction and evolved into birds

    • @henryscott370
      @henryscott370 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      here were already birds in the cretaceous...

    • @ShnoogleMan
      @ShnoogleMan 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah, t-rex became chicken.

    • @henryscott370
      @henryscott370 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      no.

    • @itsfreerealestate3621
      @itsfreerealestate3621 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      T-Rex became piles of bones.

  • @arthurmorgan9449
    @arthurmorgan9449 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I just had an argument with a guy about whether birds are Dino's and it somehow ended with him telling me I'm not man enough to have prostitutes 😂

    • @Alice-gr1kb
      @Alice-gr1kb 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lucky The Dog that happens alot

  • @Lord.Kiltridge
    @Lord.Kiltridge 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have been 'down with it' for more than 40 years. As a kid, I was reading a book that showed the skeleton of a pigeon and a skeleton of a similar shaped dino. The writer of the book was trying to illustrate the differences between the two but I was completely unconvinced. I distinctly recall saying, "It looks like a bird to me"

  • @CosmicCanvas666
    @CosmicCanvas666 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fossils only prove that such an animal existed. It doesn't show who it's ancestors were or who it's kids were. Similarities don't prove ancestry. That would only be an assumption based on the assumption that one type of animal(dinosaur) can change into another(bird).

  • @opalishmoth8591
    @opalishmoth8591 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love bird watching so now So now I love dinosaur watching! My hobby is dinosaur watching!

    • @peter320vn
      @peter320vn 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Imagine telling people that your hobby is dinosaur watching. lol

  • @SargonTheGrape
    @SargonTheGrape 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I should not have looked at the comments. I should have watched the video, said, "Hey, I already knew this, but it's still pretty neat," and moved on.

  • @Forflies
    @Forflies 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've just realised how funky the music in this is lol

  • @CaitlinMisnerCohen
    @CaitlinMisnerCohen 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Lol so that’s why we love Dino Nuggets so much! 😂🐥🦖

  • @InMaTeofDeath
    @InMaTeofDeath 10 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    Generic anti evolution god did it the earth is only 6000 years old religious comment.

    • @Wastingsometimehere
      @Wastingsometimehere 10 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      *****
      I'm sure it was meant as a troll to creationism.

    • @InMaTeofDeath
      @InMaTeofDeath 10 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      ***** *WOOOOOOSH*

    • @eveningstar1968
      @eveningstar1968 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That was a fairly poor effort at trolling D-. Must try harder.

    • @SetOnChill
      @SetOnChill 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      InMaTeofDeath WOOOOOOSH is right. Mfgcasa could have raised their hands and still would not have hit them! ;)

    • @gahjii
      @gahjii 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      eveningstar1968 . +Mfgcasa whooooosh

  • @TheLostHistoryChannelTKTC
    @TheLostHistoryChannelTKTC 10 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    There size was due to atmospheric oxygen concentrations, Don't know about the "Every Dinosaur had feathers" thing yet as crocs and lizards do ok without that today :)

    • @ElementZephyr
      @ElementZephyr 10 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The size of the larger dinosaurs came from the need to eat the taller trees and kill the bigger herbivores. When the asteroid wiped out the presence of the sun for a few decades, large size was not advantageous anymore and anything bigger than a medium sized dog *on land* died out. Sharks and such were perfectly fine up to the four meter range.
      A difference between dinosaurs and reptiles is that dinosaurs (as determined from the presence of birds) were warm blooded. They relied on internal heat to stay warm, whereabouts reptiles relied on external heat to stay warm (eg the sun).
      Now oxygen concentration would be much more plausible if you were arguing for the sake of giant *insects*, as modern insects don't actually have lungs, and are limited in size because of their trachea works on simple diffusion rather than creating a vacuum (as anything with a lung uses). However, giant insects were around with lower than Carboniferous Forest level oxygen concentrations, so quite possibly there might have been insects with lungs.

    • @RJPalmer
      @RJPalmer 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Both crocodiles and lizards predate theropod dinosaurs, so its entirely likely many of them did sport some fluff. Also the sister group to dinosaurs, pterosaurs had pycnofibres(basically fur).

    • @jg3000
      @jg3000 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Physics has crunched the numbers and said that a dinosaur's bones would break under their immense weight. However the thick atmosphere theory was proposed. Basically the gasses 65 million years ago were very thick. The pressure would be like going very deep into the ocean. This adds buoancy and makes it completely possible for them to grow to that size. Another theory I heard was there was less gravity. But I think I heard that from Jose Canseco.

    • @JaymeSplendid
      @JaymeSplendid 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The Lost History Channel TKTC Crocks and lizards are reptiles..... Dinosaurs where not....

    • @Kenny-bw2cz
      @Kenny-bw2cz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jayme Lawton correct

  • @Jeromy1986
    @Jeromy1986 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I found this video just as my wife had been asking if any herbivorous dinosaurs could have evolved as we already knew the theropods did. Glad you answered that one!

  • @whenbirdstalk5704
    @whenbirdstalk5704 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When a bird sings a conversation
    They sound a lot like us
    And analyzing it can be fun
    As they really make a fuss
    Those very intelligent crows you see
    Are the most obnoxious ones
    They talk loud and out of key
    So therefore they're like humans
    Some birds sound very pretty
    But they really don't sing loud enough
    And that is like some people, we
    Do not pay attention much
    Some birds are absolutely stunning
    To looks at with your eyes
    But when they open up to sing
    They only make hoarse cries

  • @JazneoGaming
    @JazneoGaming 8 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    So that mean when vegetarian will die off before the meat eater lol

    • @simonesilva4835
      @simonesilva4835 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Jazneo Gaming yeah because even in the end of the world they refuse to eat meat

    • @Okayand33
      @Okayand33 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Jazneo Gaming Yes it mean that

    • @neemapaxima6116
      @neemapaxima6116 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We will eat meat and even slaughter animals... the thing is that it's not necessary at this time.

    • @lhaviland8602
      @lhaviland8602 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Yeah like the brontosaurus, and look what happened to that asshole."
      -The Tourettes Guy's Dad, 2006.

  • @darkvaderfake
    @darkvaderfake 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ....Why did I scroll down here...?

  • @zachrom2621
    @zachrom2621 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The mezoic era had 3 time periods. Triasic ( forgot how to spell that) Jurassic and Cretacous. But everyone thinks that they all lived in the jurassic period and completely forgets the other 2 and i find that annoying.

  • @JG-dl4ju
    @JG-dl4ju 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Aug 12 1990 - Sue, the largest and most complete Tyrannosaurus rex skeleton found to date, is discovered by Sue Hendrickson in South Dakota.
    Aug 12 1492 - Christopher Columbus arrives in the Canary Islands on his first voyage to the New World
    What is certain is that the name of the islands does not derive from the canary bird; rather, the birds are named after the islands. Aug 12 1953 - The first testing of a real thermonuclear weapon (not test devices): The Soviet atomic bomb project continues with the detonation of "RDS-6s" (Joe 4), the first Soviet thermonuclear bomb
    Aug 12 1977 - The first free flight of the Space Shuttle Enterprise.
    Aug 12 1981 - The IBM Personal Computer is released

  • @fabadila
    @fabadila 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have this thought since i was child. When i had many chicken in my backyard. 'Why those chicken looks like dino? do birds/chicken is the giant dino in earlier earth life?' Now i have the answer. Thanks to scientist

    • @dylanmartin4461
      @dylanmartin4461 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      dude chickens are the king of the forest (T Rex)

    • @fabadila
      @fabadila 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha really Foxy best

  • @sarfios
    @sarfios 10 ปีที่แล้ว +284

    Vegetarians you better start eating meat...

    • @PurpleRaven300
      @PurpleRaven300 10 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Too bad humans humans cannot properly digest meat and because of that has lead to the two leading factors of death in the united states

    • @sarfios
      @sarfios 10 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      I eat nothing else than Meat, Fish, Eggs and nuts(jokes free pls) and... my health is soooo awesome~~~

    • @TheEmilioqazwsx
      @TheEmilioqazwsx 10 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      PurpleRaven300 This also happens with plants.

    • @ALLANX7
      @ALLANX7 10 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      death or become a tiny meat eating bird hhhhmmmm that's a hard one and I don't really want to be a copy cat

    • @Araanor
      @Araanor 10 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      sarfios i wouldn't even bother. vegans and vegetarians will ignore facts that go against their beliefs. arguing with them is useless.

  • @KennyRider137
    @KennyRider137 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Being called a chicken won't be an insult anymore.

  • @kalakritistudios
    @kalakritistudios 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your voice is really good.🤣You should do more of these videos.

  • @IvanNo1tube
    @IvanNo1tube 9 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    birds began to evolve before mass extinction

    • @throatgorge2
      @throatgorge2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      one of the reasons they are currently classified as dinosaurs.

    • @davidsnyderWisdomTrollBlocker
      @davidsnyderWisdomTrollBlocker 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah..Dinosaurs were there all the time..right in front of our eyes....we just didn't recognize them in their current avian form....funny...we called them Birds.....I remember over 30 years ago when this was first coming to light...back then ; many thought that crocodiles were the dinosaurs closest relatives...not birds....how wrong they were....Birds are dinosaurs....I believed that 30 years ago...good to see the world is finally discovering the truth....though I'm sure you will always have your disbelievers ; and those not ready to accept that fact....yeah look at me like i'm crazy; if I call them Dinosaurs....skeptics....I know the truth.

    • @upworkqureshi6665
      @upworkqureshi6665 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidsnyderWisdomTrollBlocker hahha Evolution fairy tale...

  • @uhvio70
    @uhvio70 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you SO much!! This helped me with my school project and I’m hoping to get at least a B! This information really helped! 🙃

  • @technojunkie213
    @technojunkie213 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fact. The budgerigar (parakeet) had survived harsh inland conditions for five million years. Several of these hominins used fire, occupied much of Eurasia, and gave rise to anatomically modern Homo sapiens in Africa about 315,000 years ago.

  • @BigBoiRedFrog
    @BigBoiRedFrog ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's true, Birds are descendants of dinosaurs

    • @own4801
      @own4801 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They also are dinosaurs.

  • @dezsodebreceni4829
    @dezsodebreceni4829 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love how they want to be soooo accurate in paleontology, but they drop in the MOST inaccurate footage of dinos

  • @Graoutchmeuh
    @Graoutchmeuh 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Or, maybe since gravity is just a theory, some idiot dinosaurs trying to prove that it's not real jumped out of a cliff, and as everybody knows the bigger you are the harder you fall, the opposite must be true too : the smaller you are, the softer you fall.
    And thus, smaller dinosaurs survived the gravity experiment.
    As for the flying part, one of the smaller dinosaurs lost a parent in the experiment. Devastated by sadness and anger, he spat those historical words in the face of the universe : "Screw gravity!" and took off.

    • @derpeth2101
      @derpeth2101 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Someone give this man a Nobel Prize.

  • @blubastud
    @blubastud 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So I guess technically everything taste like dinosaur...baby t-rex to be exact, lol.

  • @marceltroscianko
    @marceltroscianko 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I believe I recently read not all dinosaurs had feathers, only a few select types. This includes the Theropods, of course.

    • @gringoguapo
      @gringoguapo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes absolutely correct

  • @bigerboy014
    @bigerboy014 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The Dino nuggests speak the truth !!!

  • @SawBlood45
    @SawBlood45 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Raptor means.. bird of prey

  • @rationalmuscle
    @rationalmuscle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Birds "are" dinosaurs.

  • @daminduliyanage
    @daminduliyanage 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    lol that opening intro. it's the best one i've heard haha

  • @danikaford1710
    @danikaford1710 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    so when you think someone is being a chicken, acting scared or what have you... you can tell them "don't be a dinosaur" and confuse the shit out of them

  • @Peliha
    @Peliha 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Imagine if the T-Rex sees what we are doing to their descendants or the chickens in factory farms and how it will react.

    • @michaelanderson7715
      @michaelanderson7715 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1. T. rex
      2. Birds are NOT descended from T. rex

    • @3nigma.3nc
      @3nigma.3nc ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There are no known evolutionary descendents from the T. Rex. They were merely a part of the theropod group of dinosaurs, which contained other species that eventually evolved into birds.

  • @aarenmyatt4509
    @aarenmyatt4509 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    All I wanna know is how many of those 2.2 million subscribers don't realize that this channel is not affiliated with Discovery

  • @manishcicada
    @manishcicada 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice

  • @dorian-stefanmarciuc9939
    @dorian-stefanmarciuc9939 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    KFD: Kentucky Fried Dinosaur
    God I love it

  • @Federico84
    @Federico84 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    So birds are reptiles

    • @cooltune
      @cooltune 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can say that. Or, even better, all reptiles are birds ...... deep.

    • @MrMrMaran
      @MrMrMaran 10 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      No. Birds evolved from reptiles and became... birds.

    • @cooltune
      @cooltune 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Common now, no need to be so literal. We all get it. If we're gonna be literal , lets just ditch the word reptile, cause not all dinosaurs were cold blooded.

    • @AirflaresToSwipes
      @AirflaresToSwipes 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      No.... he was talking about only a small species of dinosaurs called Theropods that evolved into birds. Other species evolved into reptiles as well.

    • @JNCressey
      @JNCressey 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Monophyleticly speaking, birds are reptiles, but that would also make mammals be reptiles and would make birds, mammals and reptiles all be fish. Sometimes a group has to be defined paraphyleticly for it to be useful in common language. Observe this diagram of a phylogenetic tree that excludes mammals and aves[birds] from its group of reptiles. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphyly#mediaviewer/File:Traditional_Reptilia.jpg

  • @macadelic2492
    @macadelic2492 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So the dinosaur era 🦖 was really the giant bird era 🦅

  • @COVID-19_Crab
    @COVID-19_Crab 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    White Tip from Planet Dinosaur at 2:27

  • @MegaBrame
    @MegaBrame 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Uh is this a this a reference to the Big Bang theory because if it is it's not tru

    • @mikes899999
      @mikes899999 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      MegaBrame Did your mom homeschool you?

    • @pweegg2645
      @pweegg2645 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mikes8899 LMAO 😂 I was legit gonna say that.

    • @primordialprose8093
      @primordialprose8093 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      N O C O R R E L A T I O N

  • @Lady_Azkadelia
    @Lady_Azkadelia 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Love when they do stories like this so I can sit back & scroll through the comments & laugh at the religious nuts

    • @upworkqureshi6665
      @upworkqureshi6665 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bla Bla Bla Bla Bla.. Hence it is proved birds evolved from dinosaurs

    • @indoraptor3405
      @indoraptor3405 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@upworkqureshi6665 proofs it

    • @upworkqureshi6665
      @upworkqureshi6665 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Evolution is fairy tale..

    • @indoraptor3405
      @indoraptor3405 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@upworkqureshi6665 yes it is a fairy tail and evolution is fake

    • @BMcCosmic
      @BMcCosmic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@indoraptor3405 yes clearly evolution is fake but your magical fairy man in the clouds is totally real

  • @thoughtfuldevil6069
    @thoughtfuldevil6069 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Raptor literally means Bird of Prey. How fitting.

    • @robinsonray6766
      @robinsonray6766 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dromeosaurs all died out. Birds predate dromeosaurs [like velociraptor].
      Birds and mammals evolved in the Jurassic, most famous dinosaurs you see in movies evolved tens of millions of years later during the cretaceous.

  • @violet_silly9929
    @violet_silly9929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it's not that all dinosaurs *had* feathers, it's that any *could*, the ancestor lineages all had feathers, meaning any dinosaur had the possibility to have them, some couldve, and wouldve, secondarily lost their feathers

    • @robinsonray6766
      @robinsonray6766 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, protofeathers may have predated dinosaurs and been rooted earlier in archosaur history. We still don't know for sure if pterosaur ''fur'' evolved independently or early wwhen they converged with the ancestor of dinosaurs.

    • @AverageAlien
      @AverageAlien 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dumbshit profile picture. Anarchy is capitalism by the way

  • @sunilisgodd
    @sunilisgodd 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    man 95 million years ago my 9500000000x great grandpa used to be the underdog and got ate by t Rex.Well today I'm eating a chicken aka bully T Rex .Can't wait for one of my 95kx grand children to be eaten up by Mr rat,the underdog of our times.

    • @sunilisgodd
      @sunilisgodd 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Chris Martinez well the dinos would have eaten him anyway.And Yea I meant all carnivores dinos when I said t Rex.I only pointed t Rex since it is popular

    • @xBaphometHx
      @xBaphometHx 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Not Telling Yes, we know it. Mammals descend from small reptiles who became small mammals, that after became placentary mammals.

  • @Dinozzgamer1666
    @Dinozzgamer1666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Does that mean we were eating Dino nuggets from McDonald’s???

  • @dominicadlucero6260
    @dominicadlucero6260 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    its times like this when its easy to see that DNews is only ever about 50% accurate

  • @comradesnezhinka4108
    @comradesnezhinka4108 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have a parrot and I named him Dinosaur. No joke.

  • @thebatmanover9000
    @thebatmanover9000 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Ha ha we eat dinosaurs now.

    • @rexon31
      @rexon31 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      well some not all birds are tasty like chicken, some are nasty to eat and some a even poisoness :)

    • @jonathanknobel6861
      @jonathanknobel6861 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +rexon31 only one is poisonous and only from its food if raised in captivity it would be fine to eat.

    • @rexon31
      @rexon31 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      very true but the reason penguins still survive today is because they taste terrible unlike other sea birds that can be quite tasty or they would of went extinct a long time ago . only specialist hunters like sea lions and whale eat them from time to time.

    • @basilofgoodwishes4138
      @basilofgoodwishes4138 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      rexon31 Chicken isn't bad, I find it more tasty than... Say beef or Pig

    • @Zen-rw2fz
      @Zen-rw2fz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      they ate us now we them, justice

  • @TheRomanRuler
    @TheRomanRuler 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    For sake of debate;
    Many say evolution proves that humans were not created by god (and thus indirectly proving that he does not exist). But in bible there is part that i recently heard about, i don´t remember word to word but it was like this "1 000 years is a mere moment to god"
    So time it takes humans to evolve to what we are now, could easily be time what god considers to be one day.
    And science vs religion debate is in some ways idiotic, for example becouse science is about proving things, while religion is about believing things.
    Personally i think luck, nature, coincidence etc are all what we call "god", i have no doubt that if there is such thing as god, it/he is not some old man sitting at top of a cloud and throwing lightnings to humans.

    • @7xXx666xXx7
      @7xXx666xXx7 10 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Or could we all just agree that religion is human made and its at best a bad fairytale written by people living in desserts 2 Milena ago...

    • @TheRomanRuler
      @TheRomanRuler 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ishzarks Yeh, but that would mean 33% of TH-cam`s comments would be lost... Another 33% are boobs in thumbnail, and remaining 33% Hitler.

    • @galenighting9150
      @galenighting9150 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's only a theory that we came through evolution. There is still a missing link between us and the Neanderthal. It's even more strange that different species of humanoids lived on earth at the same time and were most likely unable to reproduce with each other; the homo-sapiens (us) and the Neanderthals. There is another scientific theory that fills up the gap in between our evolution process and it is the ancient aliens theory, however that one is very controversial.

    • @Boborbot
      @Boborbot 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Gale nighting will people ever stop with "its only a theory" bullshit? its fucking proven, AND IT IS A THEORY. THEY CO-EXIST.

    • @galenighting9150
      @galenighting9150 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nitay A. There is not much evidence to support that humans evolved the same way as every other species on this planet. Much less evidence because of THE MISSING LINK. I'm sorry but you took my comment the wrong way. I was trying to say that it's very hard to prove the evolution process of humans. There is much more evidence to support the evolution of every other species of the planet with Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, but humans are the pain in the ass. As I said, its only a theory that WE... WE came through evolution, There is wayyyyyy more evidence support Neanderthals evolving through the theory of evolution, but the homo sapien, not even close to as much evidence... and that's where the scientific ancient aliens theory comes in to fill the gap. But, that is only a theory as well, WITH PLENTY OF EVIDENCE... Because I already know that scientific theories involve the use of evidence to support a claim.

  • @ROGER2095
    @ROGER2095 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whenever a startled robin flys away from me, I scoff and say, "Not so tough now, are you, Mr. Dinosaur!"

  • @nitzan3782
    @nitzan3782 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My mind was blown when I discovered the bee hummingbird is the smallest known dinosaur

  • @jasonlieberman4606
    @jasonlieberman4606 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Seems legit til you get woke and realize birds aren't real.

  • @Greenlion781
    @Greenlion781 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Birds descended from dinosaurs, but they aren't dinosaurs. That would be like saying that we're rodents, because that's the type of organism that our line descended from that was contemporary to the dinosaurs. Perhaps that's nitpicky, but cavalier imprecision like that is a huge reason why alot of the general public doesn't understand and thus outright rejects evolution by natural selection.

    • @Balty_Burnip
      @Balty_Burnip 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Incorrect, birds are in a sense avian dinosaurs as dinosaurs are non avian birds, granted that is a very general description, but birds and dinosaurs have so many things in common that they have to be the same thing. A mouse is not a human because we have little to no similarities, unlike dinos and birds.

    • @avecas
      @avecas 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well a shift in the way scientists classify animals means they actually do literally consider birds part of the dinosaur clade.

    • @VeganoGuy
      @VeganoGuy 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      You talk about "the general public" not understanding. You're right. These are edutainment videos. Facts aren't really important as viewing figues.

    • @LuigiG145
      @LuigiG145 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Greenlion781 No, that's not how cladistics works.
      Birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs. Ergo, they're a kind of highly derived theropod dinosaur but they never stopped being dinosaurs.
      The mammals that were alive during the Mesozoic were not rodents, and FYI Mammalia is a crown group while Dinosauria is a class so you can't compare the two the way you just did in your comment.
      We humans are primates, and we evolved from primates that were around during the middle Cenozoic. I.E We evolved from australopithecines and basal hominids, and since humans, australopithecines, and basal hominids are all primates, then remain apes even when we evolve from them.
      When scientists say "Birds evolved from dinosaurs" they mean that birds are a kind of derived dinosaur that evolved from more basal, non-avian dinosaurs. They don't mean that by evolving, birds became a completely separate class of organisms from dinosaurs. They mean that birds are dinosaurs that evolved from a more primitive line of dinosaurs during the Mesozoic.

    • @VeganoGuy
      @VeganoGuy 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Luigi Gaskell You could begin your comments by naming the person you're responding to. I am sure your comment is not a response to me but it just helps to clarify.

  • @Haniac
    @Haniac 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool Video

  • @vetherz
    @vetherz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have pet dinosaur staring at and crowing at me as I watch this video.

  • @patrikstar8466
    @patrikstar8466 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Pffff LOL! HUH! Birds are as Much Dinosaur as Humans Being Apes! NICE TRY!

    • @StormsandSaugeye
      @StormsandSaugeye 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      So.... you are agreeing then.

    • @TheFoxyfilm
      @TheFoxyfilm 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why do you think people would fake that kind of stuff honestly? I get that you don't like being called an ape but it's okay you're still unique and special and a really nice ape at that, but seriously when you say "nice try", what do you think "they" are really trying to do?

    • @spinosaurusstriker
      @spinosaurusstriker 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shnoppy it was....

  • @asgeiralbretsen
    @asgeiralbretsen 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    So many religius people. Can't belive they still belive in creation when sience constantly are debunking them.

    • @dinodude7290
      @dinodude7290 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      soo true

    • @nuadathesilverhand3563
      @nuadathesilverhand3563 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I keep hearing that science has debunked religion: how, specifically? Sources?
      I mean, you do realize that by the very nature of religion, it is neither provable nor disprovable as a whole, right?

    • @dinodude7290
      @dinodude7290 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nuada the silver hand thats why its debunked
      because we cant test if its true or not

    • @dinodude7290
      @dinodude7290 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      for exemple how do we know if we are not created in this second with all of our memories and stuff
      we cant because it cant be tested

    • @otaku3OBSESSION
      @otaku3OBSESSION 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nuada the silver hand in so much that we know the process by which organisms evolve, and math, and physics, and all other realms of science, directly contradict many principles of many religions. Sure, its possible that they AREN’t mutually exclusive, but it would still mean a vast majority of a certain faith is incorrect. Humans could have descended from two people, but based off of what we now know about genetics, statistics, and fossils, its likely that’s not how it happened.

  • @paaao
    @paaao 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What I want to know is where bees came from, and at which point did they evolve from whatever, to assist in the pollination process of flowering plant life.

  • @robertmckeown5315
    @robertmckeown5315 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also, questions. Saw a story of Dino footprints in a creek bed made millions of years ago. #1 How are muddy footprints preserved and #2 How can a creek (or any water features like a creek) remain after millions of years?

    • @TheHothead101
      @TheHothead101 ปีที่แล้ว

      Short answer: sediments depositing in place.