it takes several days to understand the basics of the game and only a couple of seconds to understand the rules: here you'll find more explanations: online-go.com/puzzles :-D
it looks like white owned more territory too... but I'm not at all an expert (i'm just starting to understand since last week -lol)... they ended the game because probably, it was obvious for the two players who can afford to anticipate the consequence of the final moves (I guess like in chess)
Ugh, just by 2.5? This aspect of Go really (IMO) makes the game more irritating than chess. I understand winning by 10+ points but when something like AI or high Dan player knows how to win by a few points only it forces the less experienced player to keep counting the points and space.
you have a higher chance of flying into the sun than winning alphago. It's not like Chess where u can get random checkmate or checkers. Play it a few time as a beginner, you'll have 100% chance the board will go all white or black and you losing all your pieces than winning.
![Command and Conquer - Nod mission 10b - Belly of the Beast [HARD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Wqdd8bs058k/mqdefault.jpg)
Watched for 10 minutes before realizing I have no idea how this game works.
+notnormalyet me too
Really?
it takes several days to understand the basics of the game and only a couple of seconds to understand the rules: here you'll find more explanations: online-go.com/puzzles :-D
I have been watching too for a couple hours. I am hypnotized, know how it is played but not a clue why most of these moves are being made.
電腦下棋是從空間的邏輯思考。人類棋手是從時間的邏輯思考，前後子有顯著的因果關係。所以，人類棋手會被電腦的空間思考所困惑，以為會贏，結果輸的莫名其妙。
看電腦下棋很過癮，因為它似乎不在乎對手的攻守，像個自閉症的孩子，照著自己的邏輯佈局。而這個佈局在當時的時間點不具意義，但是，從空間的觀點卻可以理解，就像時間邏輯（因果關係）讓我們認識周遭，但是鳥瞰卻讓我們掌握全局（前因後果不重要，重要的是整體相關）。電腦不曉得它的動作，因為有點無釐頭，在人類眼中像是欺敵，所以，人類會覺得敗在電腦的突襲。實際上是敗在圍棋比賽更強調整體相關的空間邏輯。
+Jane Chiang 高，，，，人
có ai người việt nam xem khong
có
mình :))
Am I right in assuming that Fan Hui won?
No he lost.
it looks like white owned more territory too... but I'm not at all an expert (i'm just starting to understand since last week -lol)... they ended the game because probably, it was obvious for the two players who can afford to anticipate the consequence of the final moves (I guess like in chess)
四角穿心也能输 二段的形势判断是不是有问题
Ugh, just by 2.5? This aspect of Go really (IMO) makes the game more irritating than chess. I understand winning by 10+ points but when something like AI or high Dan player knows how to win by a few points only it forces the less experienced player to keep counting the points and space.
Is it possible for a complete beginner to defeat Alphago through luck?
Of course! With luck, all is possible... but maybe, there are more possibilities to win at a national lottery
you have a higher chance of flying into the sun than winning alphago. It's not like Chess where u can get random checkmate or checkers. Play it a few time as a beginner, you'll have 100% chance the board will go all white or black and you losing all your pieces than winning.
biết trơi thì dễ nhưng giỏi thì lại khó.
How many people here understand the game that are not Asian?
Do you?
*****
You should be proud of yourself. Not many Asian can play go, either.
*****
Most people "know" what it is, but actually being able to place stones on the go board is another story.
plenty.
dt5101961Nelon im asian this game is so cool
果然老外都看不懂
柯潔說他下的很爛
他就是Sai
+yu jul Yu 特別為大家
哈哈哈哈哈
毫无还手之力
+黄适 驚人的遊戲