A305/18: Edwin Lutyens: Deanery Gardens

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @karennewman6456
    @karennewman6456 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks for posting this excellent film about this important English country house, now occupied by Jimmy Page a guitarist from the group Led Zeppelin. Fascinating architecture.

  • @luzzermcluz
    @luzzermcluz ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for posting this. I went to school in a Sonning for years, and the Deanery always fascinated me. But never thought I’d actually get a look inside!

  • @agingflowerchild
    @agingflowerchild 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It is hard for modern people to imagine that this house was built for a world that was lit (and heated) only by fire, in a part of the world that can be quite dark and cold much of the year. Lutyens is considering not just visual and spacial experiences, but also some practical problems which are very different from our own.

  • @Knoyle1632
    @Knoyle1632 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Sir Edwin Lutyens was a great man, a great architect, a Genius !!

  • @Knoyle1632
    @Knoyle1632 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This house, this garden...it's a dream !!

  • @galas062
    @galas062 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thank you for all of these architecture videos.....

  • @GriefTourist
    @GriefTourist 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Jimmy Page has owned this for decades I believe. Probably bought it not long after this was broadcast. I never realised there was a door right on the street, hopefully it has good security as Jimmy attracts some very warped people.

  • @MisterJeffy
    @MisterJeffy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The video was shot without a wide angle lens, so it shows details of some of the interiors but never the whole. The charming anecdotes and descriptions reveal very little about the architecture.

    • @allweseeisglue
      @allweseeisglue 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you have any recommendations for videos that go into more architectural detail with good visuals? I’ve found the mix of anecdotes and visuals in this series to be most helpful

  • @BobbyReed
    @BobbyReed 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Marvelous.

  • @Knoyle1632
    @Knoyle1632 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A very good doc !!

  • @mirzafawazbaig724
    @mirzafawazbaig724 ปีที่แล้ว

    Edward lutyans DELHI building STRUCTURE LOVE IT

  • @muhammadjafni789
    @muhammadjafni789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    came here for assigment

  • @johnmm
    @johnmm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Now home, I believe, of Jimmy Page (founder of Led Zeppelin)

    • @georgiacristea
      @georgiacristea 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fortunately not. he owns The Tower House _en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tower_House

    • @DanDruff66
      @DanDruff66 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@georgiacristea He also owns Deanery Gardens, as well as The tower House and previously owned The old Mill House in Windsor, Boleskine House overlooking Loch Ness and Plumpton Place in Sussex.

    • @georgiacristea
      @georgiacristea 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DanDruff66 _Thank you!

    • @colinallen8924
      @colinallen8924 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@georgiacristea, why "fortunately not"?

    • @dragonmartijn
      @dragonmartijn ปีที่แล้ว

      @@colinallen8924Maybe because people don’t want satanic rituals in such a beautiful house?

  • @robertjohns6008
    @robertjohns6008 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    9:03 Ah yes, the immediate question of if we can take Lutyens seriously... A better question is whether we can take seriously someone with such misguided inquiry. The whole time he's trying to come off as an objective authority, but he can't get out hardly a single sentence of commentary without evident bias and disdain for this assignment he's been forced to carry out. Modernist misanthropic martian of a man.

    • @SilojensenDK
      @SilojensenDK 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hi there, You’ve got it all wrong. Dr. Baker explains why you can’t fault Lutyens for not being a modernist, as so many modernists did later on, when writing off great architects of the pre-modern era as “medieval” and therefore irrelevant. This was very much the case in the 1970’s when the program was made. Baker then proceeds to demonstrate how great Lutyens was as an architect:
      1. Can we take him seriously? Baker answers that Lutyens was never a part of any modernist movement, which was long after his time. In fact, only Macintosh on the British isles had the modernist spirit as it was defined post WWI. So yes - we should take Lutyens seriously.
      2. How good was he? Presenter goes on to explain the brilliant layout of the house plans and intricate relationship of house and garden with every angle and detail thought through down to the last rain gutter. So yes, he was in fact great.
      This whole program’s purpose is to bring to light the brilliance of Lutyens in a time of international modernism and “verfremdung.”

  • @margaretpepper3550
    @margaretpepper3550 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Suburb, simply suburb....