Climate Change Debate | Jack Woollett | Proposition
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ค. 2016
- SUBSCRIBE for more speakers ► is.gd/OxfordUnion
Oxford Union on Facebook: / theoxfordunion
Oxford Union on Twitter: @OxfordUnion
Website: www.oxford-union.org/
The Motion: This House Believes The West Has No Right to Impose Environmental Standards on Developing Countries
Jack Woollett opens the case for the proposition, as the first speaker of six in the debate.
The individual in this video is a competitive debater, and therefore the views expressed may not necessarily represent his/her beliefs.
The motion was defeated.
ABOUT THE OXFORD UNION SOCIETY: The Oxford Union is the world's most prestigious debating society, with an unparalleled reputation for bringing international guests and speakers to Oxford. Since 1823, the Union has been promoting debate and discussion not just in Oxford University, but across the globe.
![[LIVE] ย้อนวันวานกับนางเอกยุค 90's #คุยให้เด็กมันฟัง EP.42 (8/6/67)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MslQDdFwULE/mqdefault.jpg)
Appreciate the channel uploading these in order, listing the order, AND putting the outcome in the description. I see you read the comments :)
Speakers that introduce the opposing side with humour are next level
Thanks for raising our climate-related problems in the debate. 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇬🇧🇬🇧
Handsome and very intelligent young man with a good moral concious, we need more of this. I wish him well in is future endeavours.
Could such an advancement of the human experience have been possible without burning fossil fuels?
It it's easy to imposed, but hard to implements.
This guy is just amazing!! Smart, to the point and good sense of humor
Jack and Kriti this massage only for you😊if u see this massage reply me. May be I'm to late but it's ok
Who is she ,Infront of Speakers.
Why are they passing bitter sweet comments on each other instead of actually speaking about the topic
The analogy he gave at the beginning was incomplete and lopsided, what he missed was the clause of going first, the player who goes first definitely scores a hundred point even if he doesn’t find the ball, for those going second are assured of 50 points if they deliberately choose the same cup, even after knowing that there’s nothing inside. and the best clause of the game was that, they just need 50 points to survive to the next level. Obviously no choice left!
If it’s not about the players competing and winning individually then they could probably cut a deal of sharing the first gain made and the player who goes second shouldn’t/wouldn’t have wasted a chance luring for small gain. The case is simple, In the real world it’s not about players, it’s about survival and there’s only one team and is losing, - The living beings!
Please tell me you ride a bicycle everywhere, don't take planes or boats with engines, grow your own food so to not contribute to the trucking industry, do not use electricity or public water but instead candles and boiled water from your nearest water source, and never use any type of harmful chemicals.
The estimated earth age is 4.5 billion years. Is it a good idea to think humans can destroy the earth and living beings? This may be over rated just like COVID. I can't even imagine how living beings evolved over 4.5 billion years. Humans will for sure find solutions to any challenege and will survive (with the help of mass conciousness). There are good videos on "Creatures Living INSIDE Volcanoes"
@@rashadjones8517 Dont forget about TH-cam and the internet. That contributes to climate change as well. Its really ridiculous when people say there's only one team.
huhu always be in my playlist
Why they don't learn some of the theory they've written onto their notes!
Did she just fall in love with the Speaker? 09:53
I think so
I just paused it to make that point myself. She definitely swooned.
I don't think so. This is your opinion. 🙂
@@happyjoon4846 It was a joke..
@@seraphim9219 ooo really 🤨
Awareness is the key to elaborate this issue. If country like China gives the highest polution level for the world, The great instituion like United Nation below its part like UNDP must dictacts and warms to be wise of China's enviromental system because the result goes globally. It's hard issue but must be handle by awareness of all principals.
I watched this only to conclude that Oxford may not be that great
wow same
I think he phrases his speech in a way that uses 5 fancy sentences to explain a point that can be captured by 1 simple sentence.
WHAT the white queen is sitting for?
rose
Per capita consumption of meat in W. Europe and USA in excess of 180kg per capita per yr. This contributes to poor land use, water wastage, methane and emissions resulting from supply chain and a slew of other unsustainable practices that harm oceans and Forests.
(Per capita consumption in India 4 kg per capita per yr, Asia consumes the least of all continents)
Generally speaking Asia is more densely populated than Europe. India for ex has nearly 5 times the population of the US with a third of the land it has. Canada's population is about twice the size of New Delhi's and it has 3 times the land compared to India. I can go on and on.
As the speaker points out developing countries have to balance economic and industrial activity and environmental practices. But for structural reasons we have to be doubly mindful of water, Forrest's, clean air and other natural resources.
Although we are ahead on our UN targets for switching to renewables and although we have planted almost a billion trees in recent years, we have to constantly balance industrial growth with environmental policy which impacts public health among other quality of life indicators.
We realise if we model our society on the wasteful, consumerist systems pioneered in the West the country is in for catastrophe.
So whereas I agree the West shouldn't pontificate, it should lead by setting an example.
n=你做得好啊
One name Dr. Roy Spencer
Darn he is hech 1000 times more nervous than kriti
you got him 😅
yeah
*rubs nose*
Driving me crazy!
I have been privileged to been employed by a large Aerospace company that includes some of the most experienced Atmospheric Biologists in the world. These are folks tasked with tracking data not to satisfy the man made climate change narrative but to find conditions that produce efficiency in air travel. It turns out that more efficiency has a by-product of less pollution. The 2 scientists I have supported for nearly 20 years agree on several things, pollution is bad for everyone, that alternative fuels are the future and that the 2 biggest influences to the Climate are Solar radiance and Geothermal/Volcanic activity. That there are no recorded patterns to establish any causation by any other factors. Even the orbit of the Earth and Moon contribute more impact than man has.
Why didn't they have qualified Physisists? Oh they wouldn't lie!
Why does he keep checking if his nose is still on his face?
Can someone explain to me what he is talking about?😢
Climate change
Yo Mama
how is our pollution effecting the same extremes in weather on the other planets in our solar system? or is it the lack of sun spots on our sun giving us a clue to whats happening? maunder minimum
The Underdeveloped,the Development and the Developed Countries with Regards to climate change
Canada is larger than USA and its also in the West
Climate change is normal we had already some Ice times and in the middle ages it was warmer then is now ,climate change is normal we should worry when that stops .
No offense intended but:
While Climate change is a natural process due to Sun spots, volcanic eruptions etc.. The problem that we r facing currently is that it's effects are being exacerbated due to human activities that include excessive carbon emissions.
I agree that we should worry when climate change stops but we should also be worrying about the fact that the current rate of climate change and it's detrimental effects are toppling the natural balance of the environment and mother earth.
@@thatperson8741 Outside of climate models and charts with a history of bad predictions there's no hard evidence that CO2 is causing rapid changes of Earth's climate. Many scientists question the impact humans have on the climate, but you won't hear about it on TV or in the classroom because it doesn't fit with the agenda. Let's not forget about Climate Gate which has never been debunked.
@@milkyswag01 History of bad predictions?? There's a stagerring difference between Climate and Weather
@@malkisehgal2481 The climate models that predict the climate over the next decade or 2 are almost always wrong. Ever wondered why they quit calling it global warming? Because there was a warming pause that lasted a few years.
@@milkyswag01 Yeah sure they were wrong.. That's why 14 of the 16 years into the 2000s were hottest on record and I don't have the data after 2016 at the moment... Will edit and update
😂 wardrobe change
Debating to win or debating to fight again the global warming? 🔪🙂
Nice debate 🤗🥳🥳
China has a few coal-fired power station about 1500 so your wind solar is not much What is China going to do Just think about it go solar. JOKE
Can he stop referring to the cheat note? This is Oxford level lol...
most (if not all) students use their notes during debates
@@RevivedRecords yep...cuz these aren't some regular 2 minute long speeches.... confidence nd valid points that r composed well r required which r clearly there...
It's not a cheat note. It's not our usual school or college level debate.
should we let developing nations commit the same mistakes we did? does the planet deserve to suffer because done people have feelings?
It's that old adage; what's the point in development if it's a means to an end. The irony is we are going to 'develop' ourselves out of existence at the rate we're going. And the bigger irony is that climate change will affect developing nations first. Most of the poorest nations on earth inhabit the equator and area that is already hard to inhabit. Add climate change to that and it will be so hot it will be uninhabitable. The funniest thing is that humans can occupy rather cold areas hence the Inuit. They're quite resourceful. But there is a threshold where humans definitely can't occupy somewhere too hot. And it's a much lower threshold. As in colder climes water is abundant and you can use frozen water as building material. You can't however build with sand and no water.
+Darren “Daz” Silk the equator is tropical and full of water, it's full of rain forests.
but underdeveloped nations shouldn't have full range to continue to harm the planet just because the developed nations already have.
no nation should have an excuse to ignore climate change. or any other environmental issues.
Perhaps the developed nations that developed by robbing the "developing nations" and polluting for centuries should stop robbing the third world. In fact even though the "developing nations" are producing and polluting more at this point, A LOT of that production is owned by first world capitalists.
The issue is capitalism and it's endless need for economic growth. Developed nations use up most of the wold's resources and waste the most. The "developing countries" basically became their factories.
The pollution happening in the developing countries is directly linked to the consumption of resources in the developed countries. The fact is the developed nations would need to totally change the global economic model and reduce their quality of life and the abundance of material goods before something can be done about this.
Sir her persionaly fiscally sicolgycaly her claimant change goit sir 1 family bad activity 2 money depond 3 sex bad activity 4 econmice market 5 colcher place cloth 6 respect talk diffrent style 7 belive live market 8 earth take respect 9 socity moveing insert education 10 problem fool goit true line move goit
The speaker keeps referring to "the West", it's Obama..the rest of America dosent support forced compliancy. This is one reason why were voting his Admin out. Unfortunately the people's voice has been hushed, but not for long.
Now that we have new representation, we have backed out of the compliance and group think of the west. What is the response? An automatic, antagonistic attack because Pres Trump is “orange man bad” to the NPCs. Lastly, “If we go unchecked” and “we can stop climate change” are the most idiotic, snooty statements I’ve ever heard.
These are so boring and not informational
Cool
Why is he using politics to try and explain science?
As a Pakistani, I want to say on behalf of all developing countries , we are just paying for what western developed countries did 200 years ago. it's them that they are responsible for global warming when usa was ranked 35 and india 22, through the industrial revolution they have augmented the world's economic in their country , now when developing countries are on wave to have industrial or manufacturing revolution , they are forced down to come down , no we will not step down untill you all western countries provide us sufficient funds like carbon credits and sustainable technology to help us implement SDGs esp 7 / clean and cheap energy. Renewable energy is way fwd.
You all bear a responsiblilty to help. Aijaz from lahore