6:49 for me it seems like it slowed down to change lanes but had to break harder to avoid that car that zoomed by ? Maybe Tesla needs to adjust the breaking power just a tad bit. I could be completely off. Just what I saw
Interesting that at 7:11ish it sees the height sign on the bridge as a red light for an instant. I'm sure that would lead to phantom braking on the highway if it happened regularly, as well... EDIT: same thing at 8:19... Interesting that it doesn't seem to brake even though it 'sees' a yellow/red light.
It seems like Hurry is to overtake the majority of normal traffic speed. Standard mimics majority of traffic speed. And Chill Stays a bit below the majority of traffic speed.
Fyi the profiles of chill standard and assertive are vrelated to the lanes used on the highway and how often lane changes happen not the speed. The max speed is independent
Been trying the FSD in the north of Boston area. Overall have been very disappointed. Does stop signs very strange (stops to early, takes forever to creep forward, then wiggles the steering wheel as it turn onto the road). Highway driving: sits in the left lane too much. Takes exit not very smoothly (goes into the exit lane too late, brakes on the highway versus only braking in the exit lane). Tend to disengage FSD more often as driving by myself is more relaxing than using FSD. Sad to say. Considering the quality of this, seems crazy we have to pay money for this at this time. Might get better, but for now, not worth it 😞
I found hw3 to have alot of minor issues like the ones you described. I really hope they fix these. And got the chance to drive a few loaners the last few weeks I found the performance to change between each car for some weird reason. Thanks for your comment I understand it's frustrating
After 4 years in development and 1000's of engineering man hours, the latest FSD software still has all kinds of flaws. Its a simple minded Level 2 assistant. Full Self Driving is a dream, now it has been down graded to Supervised Driving. So sad .
@@TeslaColdEnvy 8 years ago, Elon said that *soon* FSD will drive from Los Angeles to New York, automatically, with zero input from the human in the car. The human could read a book or go to sleep, and the car will drive safely across the country. When is that going to happen?
Understood but unlike others he is working towards it! And one thing about elon he never gives up. I would take broken fsd versus any other car maker like mercedes fake level 3 that does work unless the conditions are optimal or waymos robotaxi that works on specific hd mapped roads
@@TeslaColdEnvy Elon's promises or predictions mean very little. EIther he is a total dreamer, or he intentionally says nonsense to the public. For example: Elon says in 15 years there will be 10 billion android robots (Optimus?) in people's homes, at a cost of 20k usd each. Utter nonsnse. Elon says in 25 years, he would like to see 1 million humans living on planet Mars. Ridiculous on so many levels. Robotaxi is years late. Semi Truck is years late. FSD is years late.
_the latest FSD software still has all kinds of flaws._ Yes, and in spite of this NHTSA statistics show that Teslas with FSD engaged are involved in a reportable accident only every 17.3 *million* VMT, while human drivers are involved in one every 539 *thousand* VMT - more than 30 times as often. _Its a simple minded Level 2 assistant._ This fatuous assertion shows you either share the common misconception that the SAE Level has something to do with how good, or how safe, or how skilled, or how useful a driving automation system is, or you know it doesn't and are lying about it. SAE J3016 makes it crystal clear that the SAE Level of an ADAS or ADS has nothing to do with its performance, and states explicitly that "[these levels] do not specify or imply that, for example, Level 3 is 'better' than Level 2". The *only* significant difference between SAE requirements for Levels 2 through 4 is who takes over if the ADAS or ADS encounters a condition it can't handle, and how long they have to take over. In Level 2, the human must take over immediately when requested. In Level 3, a delay is allowed, typically 10 seconds; and in Level 4 there's no requirement for a human to take over. That's why FSD is Level 2, while the vastly inferior MB Drive Pilot can be Level 3-it allows ten seconds for the driver to take back control when necessary. _Full Self Driving is a dream_ In areas such as SoCal and the SF Bay Area, where there's a large enough concentration of Teslas to provide all necessary training videos for the NN, FSD literally *is* a dream. FSD has been driving me around San Diego for several weeks now on the latest versions of the software, completely hands-free, with only 2-3 disengagements-all of which were navigation issues, which FSD worked out by rerouting to get to the set destination. It's like being driven around by a professional chauffeur, with my hands in my lap or on the armrests. It even does limousine stops at every stop, a skill I've tried unsuccessfully to master. The fact that you identify this as "glorified cruise control" means you're either extraordinarily ill-informed of its current capabilities, or deliberately spreading FUD. Only you know which is the case, but I'm betting on the latter. _now it has been down graded [sic] to Supervised Driving_ This is what I like to call *FALSE.* As you well know, it has actually been upgraded from FSD (Beta) to FSD (Supervised).
I had no idea the car could be rebooted while in drive. Even more amazing, while FSD engaged, what?????:)!
Haha yes! You can reboot at anytime, it's amazing. Works for noa too 😉
6:49 for me it seems like it slowed down to change lanes but had to break harder to avoid that car that zoomed by ? Maybe Tesla needs to adjust the breaking power just a tad bit. I could be completely off. Just what I saw
Yes i see same
❤
Interesting that at 7:11ish it sees the height sign on the bridge as a red light for an instant. I'm sure that would lead to phantom braking on the highway if it happened regularly, as well...
EDIT: same thing at 8:19... Interesting that it doesn't seem to brake even though it 'sees' a yellow/red light.
Yes those are weird I guess because it's last second
It seems like
Hurry is to overtake the majority of normal traffic speed.
Standard mimics majority of traffic speed.
And Chill Stays a bit below the majority of traffic speed.
Fyi the profiles of chill standard and assertive are vrelated to the lanes used on the highway and how often lane changes happen not the speed. The max speed is independent
Been trying the FSD in the north of Boston area. Overall have been very disappointed. Does stop signs very strange (stops to early, takes forever to creep forward, then wiggles the steering wheel as it turn onto the road). Highway driving: sits in the left lane too much. Takes exit not very smoothly (goes into the exit lane too late, brakes on the highway versus only braking in the exit lane).
Tend to disengage FSD more often as driving by myself is more relaxing than using FSD. Sad to say. Considering the quality of this, seems crazy we have to pay money for this at this time. Might get better, but for now, not worth it 😞
I found hw3 to have alot of minor issues like the ones you described. I really hope they fix these. And got the chance to drive a few loaners the last few weeks I found the performance to change between each car for some weird reason. Thanks for your comment I understand it's frustrating
It knew no cars were behind you
Is lane hugging and an extra or a standard feature?? FFS
Whats yourvideo again ten time brake 0.25 speed, it not was phanthom.
That aint phantom anything. Slowed down to get behind the car on the left, rather than cutting it off, to allow for extra room for the merging cars!!!
Yes I see it now but that is a huge brake for move like that. Definitely not recommended
After 4 years in development and 1000's of engineering man hours, the latest FSD software still has all kinds of flaws. Its a simple minded Level 2 assistant. Full Self Driving is a dream, now it has been down graded to Supervised Driving. So sad .
It has its ups and downs but the trend is headed towards a full autonomous capability... Its taking forever though
@@TeslaColdEnvy 8 years ago, Elon said that *soon* FSD will drive from Los Angeles to New York, automatically, with zero input from the human in the car. The human could read a book or go to sleep, and the car will drive safely across the country.
When is that going to happen?
Understood but unlike others he is working towards it! And one thing about elon he never gives up. I would take broken fsd versus any other car maker like mercedes fake level 3 that does work unless the conditions are optimal or waymos robotaxi that works on specific hd mapped roads
@@TeslaColdEnvy Elon's promises or predictions mean very little. EIther he is a total dreamer, or he intentionally says nonsense to the public. For example:
Elon says in 15 years there will be 10 billion android robots (Optimus?) in people's homes, at a cost of 20k usd each. Utter nonsnse.
Elon says in 25 years, he would like to see 1 million humans living on planet Mars. Ridiculous on so many levels.
Robotaxi is years late.
Semi Truck is years late.
FSD is years late.
_the latest FSD software still has all kinds of flaws._
Yes, and in spite of this NHTSA statistics show that Teslas with FSD engaged are involved in a reportable accident only every 17.3 *million* VMT, while human drivers are involved in one every 539 *thousand* VMT - more than 30 times as often.
_Its a simple minded Level 2 assistant._
This fatuous assertion shows you either share the common misconception that the SAE Level has something to do with how good, or how safe, or how skilled, or how useful a driving automation system is, or you know it doesn't and are lying about it. SAE J3016 makes it crystal clear that the SAE Level of an ADAS or ADS has nothing to do with its performance, and states explicitly that "[these levels] do not specify or imply that, for example, Level 3 is 'better' than Level 2". The *only* significant difference between SAE requirements for Levels 2 through 4 is who takes over if the ADAS or ADS encounters a condition it can't handle, and how long they have to take over. In Level 2, the human must take over immediately when requested. In Level 3, a delay is allowed, typically 10 seconds; and in Level 4 there's no requirement for a human to take over. That's why FSD is Level 2, while the vastly inferior MB Drive Pilot can be Level 3-it allows ten seconds for the driver to take back control when necessary.
_Full Self Driving is a dream_
In areas such as SoCal and the SF Bay Area, where there's a large enough concentration of Teslas to provide all necessary training videos for the NN, FSD literally *is* a dream. FSD has been driving me around San Diego for several weeks now on the latest versions of the software, completely hands-free, with only 2-3 disengagements-all of which were navigation issues, which FSD worked out by rerouting to get to the set destination. It's like being driven around by a professional chauffeur, with my hands in my lap or on the armrests. It even does limousine stops at every stop, a skill I've tried unsuccessfully to master. The fact that you identify this as "glorified cruise control" means you're either extraordinarily ill-informed of its current capabilities, or deliberately spreading FUD. Only you know which is the case, but I'm betting on the latter.
_now it has been down graded [sic] to Supervised Driving_
This is what I like to call *FALSE.* As you well know, it has actually been upgraded from FSD (Beta) to FSD (Supervised).