Being a Ford RS fan since i saw my first one, then owning a few RS Cosworth's i thought that was the best you could make of a run of the mill road car. Then this GR Yaris turned up ...WTF!!! this has spun my nut! a 3 cylinder 1600 doing over 400 bhp without filling the sump with shiny bits!!. Being 63 years old & now driving a Toyota Hilux i thought my hooning days were long gone. I am feeling the old RS (GR) tingle & i need one of these!!!
That's quite extraordinary holding 32psi at 320kw on stock rods, will be interesting if it holds up to a track day and the drags. Times around the creek and Lud would be interesting.
@@zaksuzuki Took torque an power out of the lower rpm for the Rods to not fly out of the block, i built GR Yaris + this turbo kit you can go ham with the torque
Very Cool! I know everyone is ranting on about it being the new 2Jx , Also consider that there are a90s out there with 500-600wkw. So this is performing on par with that Pound for pound with a little over half the capacity . Very Very Juicy!
Awesome result and very interesting about turbo size. I’d like to see a measurement of pre and post turbo exhaust pressure. Maybe using a slightly smaller turbine/housing will still make the numbers but, make a little more down low (as was discussed). Exciting!!!
That is some great work on the Yaris! Ryan really explained everything really great, he's very good at presenting information! Love the Yaris project, Motive is really coming with some great content these days! Good job Andrew! Can't wait to see you drive it!
This is crazy power for a yaris! But hey the small cars needed to be added to the modified range! My Getz is turbo now it's running 100kw at the wheels where factory its only 50kw...only changed the injectors, fuel pump and ecu. My other mate is running a 160kw getz its running 25psi. And only weights 900kg. Love it! I hope they bring out a factory turbo getz to par with the AMAZING Yaris.
Very interesting to see car being able to handle so much power with stock block. That said,on the road the car is much better with the stock turbo, with the gt25-550 it spools way too late in the rev range. I would like to see a stock turbo with larger wheels to see of you can get close to 400hp at the crank without loosing too much low rev torque.
the numbers dont surprise me TBH, its a homologation special, just like the Evo, STi, Celica GT4 Escort Cosworth, etc all were.....and you know what they all had? very strongly built engines to go racing with. Great vid as per usual
Can someone pls explain why is it safer to archive peak torque higher up in the rev range than lower. According to me. Torque and cylinder pressures are correlated to each other. Having higher cylinder pressures at a lower rpm will still put the same force on the engine components as it would at higher rpms.
Hi, from what I have experienced, the peak torque is moved due to the larger turbine housing, however, I don't believe that "moving peak torque higher really does make it safer... I could be wrong... Probably. What I do know is that peak torque is the point where the engine most likely to get hurt so... What I do is decide the max power I want from early and get the smallest turbine housing that can support that power but with minimal lag then ramp in the turbo as hard as possible to a lower boost level say 5500 at a lower boost say 12 psi then after that have a smooth line going to 20 psi by 7500rpms. So after "peak torque" the power continues to go up but is smoother and won't "shock" the engine. Result is faster times without traction losses and the car is exceptionally responsive. Mind u it's a starlet with a 5e engine. Hope this helps. As I said this is just my experience.
@@glanzaturbo definitely helps. Thx you so much for such a detailed answer! What are the reasons you think peak torque is the point the engine is most likely to get hurt? And why putting it higher in the rev range makes the engine safer
You're forgetting that horsepower is torque times rpm. Making the same torque higher in the rev range is spreading it over more cylinder events, therefore cylinder pressure is lower.
@@AndrewNoronha-cb2gy There are a few reasons from my understanding(not a professional) Motive can probably give you a more concise answer but as i said this is my experience in Jamaica where we have 90 octane #sad. Poor fuel quality causes detonation. When dealing with timing advance you will basically make the most torque/power on the brink of destruction. in a well tuned motor we usually carry it as close to that point on the garbage gas until (unfortunately) we get a touch of knock then take off a couple of degrees so its safe and even if we get worst than the 90 octane a gas stations vary in my country (quality wise) detonation causes rods to shake and usually (please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm working with the concept that the fuel map is tuned out properly) and the high cylinder pressure at peak torque can crush the bearings. Sorry for the long response. so i use a gfb 3005 boost controller that ramps in the turbo aggressively but then only to "Safe" boost level and i use a megasquirt to ramp in the higher level after peak torque progressively for the smoothness and drivability. the other reason i use the gfb is because i like having the 6 different presets to switch depending on road/mood but the concept work the same on all boost levels as the megasquirt allows me to set boost by rpm and tps location so there is no boost spike while cruising on the highway.
yeah , the figures are impressive but its very unlikely to be able to deliver this for a decent period of time... personally i think 340hp on the stock turbo would be the sweet spot.
I was sooo thinking that! but... to their "future proofing" maybe they want eventually 500+ hp which the .72 might have too much backpressure... just a consideration. but yeah if 430 was their end goal then the .72 would have been a better choice in my view.
Congratulations on the impressive results, so #1 bigger in-tank aftermarket fuel pump (liter per hour & fuel press at the stock electric pump after & injectors duty cycles?) #2 larger map sensor (how many bars)?? In addition congratulations on the TOM’s rear ducts waiting for an installation vid along with new hood vent (preferred the WRC’s one than these as the first vent dose it’s job perfectly maybe if you make a comparison trick with orange fiber string or line used with your first vent Lastly I saw Kelford cams set not sure if there is any gains at low range and the beginning of mid range for a faster spool as well due to the bigger compressor at the new gt25 Can’t wait to see it on track/drag Seriously I’m thinking about getting one shipped to Egypt. I love the title of the most powerful GR taking it from point the most powerful 3 cylinder engine I have had a most powerful 1300cc engine G13b SSGTi and most powerful 1.6L B16B boosted Honda’s engine, it’s time for the GR and thanks to you BTW I wondered if there is any information available about aftermarket high performance forged pistons & rods. Keep it up guys. 👍
Hi, very impressive. Which Turbine housing is on the g25-550? I'm buying one with a .49 to run on my 5e at 20 psi . Only looking for 300-320hp. I have 266 camshafts and pistons and rods. Should I go with a larger housing. It has management so I can actually ramp the boost in safely to not hurt the motor at peak torque but I want it aggressive without much lag as it's a daily driver. Any additional info would be appreciated. thanks
HKS & G Force GR Yaris in Japan also reached 400hp mark months ago (HKS does use 100 shots of Nitrous for it to reach 450hp), so it's pretty safe to say this 3cyl has a lot of potential in it. Granted the engine itself was probably designed to be able to run in WRC2/WRC3 as well which makes it able to withstand that kind of power.
Didn't you guys found any oil pressure drop during hard braking? I've discovered the issue running with the Syvecs and analyzing the logs, then surfed the web and found out it's a common problem..
The GR Yaris was intended to enter WRC (at least WRC2 or WRC3) hence the engine has to follow WRC's regulation as well. In WRC2, R5/Rally2 engines are regulated to 1.6l engine limited to 7500rpm, pretty similar to what the 3cyl engine inside the GR Yaris. Even the AP4 regulation (equivalent to R5) also only allowed a maximum of 1.6l engine as well. Neil Bates Motorsport already made an AP4 GR Yaris which still uses the same engine.
This won't drive / accelerate like a GR Yaris anymore. The boost seems to kick in ALOT later than the stock turbo. BUT, a turbo swap costs money so... going up in turbo size, you need to be smart about it and find the right balance between more power and less lag. So I don't know... but these guys are supposed to be experts. Is this the right turbo-charger to upgrade to? Or something a bit smaller, yet still bigger than the stock turbo, but with better response than this turbo?
Don’t do this to your street Yaris. You also must remember what these guys would have spent RRP to get this car to where it is now. It’s not going to be for every dude in a Yaris that wants a bit more HP. There’s also no telling how long this will last, it’s all a mystery, they can have a million sensors but it can snap a rod or grenade the box/transfers case in a blink of an eye.
Very impressive now lets see if it can beat the HKS yaris with 475hp which is to my knowledge the most powerful since 2020.I believe it even ran 500hp at one time.Still very impressed with the strenght of that small 3 pot.👍
@@dejan. If anything there's also another GR Yaris in Japan that also reached 400+hp tuned by G-Force with no NOS. They ran the car at Tsukuba Time Attack and nearly beat HKS GR Yaris' lap times as well (around 58.5s), though i remember the car was around 360hp at that time)
Honestly, this is an advertisement for the advances in OEM manufacturing, Toyota's commitment to building a true rally special and to the benefits of modern electronics. Just imagine trying to screwing 30+ PSI of boost into an unopened 4A-GZE to make +300kW to the hubs... Wonder how well the OE gearbox will take it or the whole system when it gets hot on the track. Lap after Lap... Or launching on the sticky track Very impressed, but boy does it need some bigger cams :D
The gearbox is the EA6x series (Aisin BG6), these are also used by the Lotus Evora and the powerful Toyota diesels we had in Europe. They are pretty stout as they are rated to around 400nm I think.
On our chassis dyno we were doing power and torque curves starting from the fuel cut working it down to about 800rpm with a very slow deceleration rate. But we're talking about big 13l diesel inline 6's in 12th gear with lazy turbos :D. Just couldn't measure good enough down low
If you move that bit up there and put that bit down there and move that other bit from down there to up there and add more boost then that bit down there will make more power.
I really hope Toyota brings this engine and drivetrain to the states as some form of Corolla. I’d literally replace my BMW X3M Competition with it since I haven’t driven it in nearly a year, because it’s just not that exciting to drive even if it makes 650awhp. If/When that happens, im totally going balls to the wall with the first mods being fuel, ignition, cooling and slightly larger turbo.
So what, basically a 2JZ? That’s what it would be x2. No I think the future might be these large displacement inline-3 turbo engines. How can you beat the power curves and HP/TQ numbers
Japanese dynos are “calculated engine PS” and out experience of bringing cars here and vi e versa is they massively over read. HKS saying 375PS would be lucky to make 300hp at the wheels. No one has seen their dyno graph either
@@MotiveVideo that is True. But they get very good track times with that car which tell there has to be power behind. Usual if whe think gt86 time attack car they say there is 800hp and those track times tell there is over 1000hp..
With knowing how much power is stock, you could add some more to the low end, but being this is more track focused that bump in the higher top end is quite noticeable. Regarding E fuels most don't notice much difference past 40-60% content other than fuel use, yes it can be made safer with its properties with tuning, but if you have it available and you have the pump for it, it is never a bad thing. As all packages can react differently with various different limiting factors.
@@scootbmx01 they said it's how they tuned it , but that's only true to a very small extent. Seems you were implying it is deliberately tuned to be lazy
@@rntechnologies1112 I did, but I was getting ready while I was watching, so I might have missed some parts. So why be cocky and not just answer my question?
The development is impressive. I know Toyota chose a 3 cylinder engine because of weight consideration and purpose built, however i would have preferred a 4AGE 20V turbo engine.
Would have been better if you did the tuning on ron 98 petrol. Tuning a street car for exotic fuels that arent available for the most part is not real world accurate.
@@MotiveVideo We are in Australia the same as you are. There are about 6 stations in Melbourne cbd that actually sell it. Tuning should be done with what is commonly available. 98 or lpg or e10. The cars original power was for petrol, Running it on E85 with increased power is not hard.
This guy is really good on video, really interesting stuff. Motive's content has been on an absolutely tear recently. Great stuff.
MotiveVideo should off him a contract 🤔😉
@@cheapcharlie7 off him? Like a contract killing? That's harsh man
Being a Ford RS fan since i saw my first one, then owning a few RS Cosworth's i thought that was the best you could make of a run of the mill road car. Then this GR Yaris turned up ...WTF!!! this has spun my nut! a 3 cylinder 1600 doing over 400 bhp without filling the sump with shiny bits!!. Being 63 years old & now driving a Toyota Hilux i thought my hooning days were long gone. I am feeling the old RS (GR) tingle & i need one of these!!!
Still can't believe this channel has so little subs for this great content it pumps out
That's quite extraordinary holding 32psi at 320kw on stock rods, will be interesting if it holds up to a track day and the drags. Times around the creek and Lud would be interesting.
Wow! That is insane power from a 3 banger. Mini 2JZ! Would be cool to see the same sonic tests you did on the RB and 2JZ
Unfortunately comes with sooo much lag. It'll be much slower than stock in day to day driving.
@@sodazman that thing is lazy as fark now, power band is so narrow, power aint everything..
@@zaksuzuki Took torque an power out of the lower rpm for the Rods to not fly out of the block, i built GR Yaris + this turbo kit you can go ham with the torque
@@zaksuzuki yeah... just like a mini 2jz lol
its supposed to be a smart engine
Very Cool! I know everyone is ranting on about it being the new 2Jx , Also consider that there are a90s out there with 500-600wkw. So this is performing on par with that Pound for pound with a little over half the capacity . Very Very Juicy!
That is a seriously impressive power figure for an unopened 1.6 liter 3 cylinder engine. Great tech and minds to get this far!
It is a little bit opened
Awesome result and very interesting about turbo size. I’d like to see a measurement of pre and post turbo exhaust pressure. Maybe using a slightly smaller turbine/housing will still make the numbers but, make a little more down low (as was discussed). Exciting!!!
That is some great work on the Yaris! Ryan really explained everything really great, he's very good at presenting information! Love the Yaris project, Motive is really coming with some great content these days! Good job Andrew! Can't wait to see you drive it!
This feels like i'm watching some HP Academy special and im loving it
Ah these are the videos I look forward to the most!
That little engine is a ticking time bomb. Crazy power!
This is crazy power for a yaris! But hey the small cars needed to be added to the modified range! My Getz is turbo now it's running 100kw at the wheels where factory its only 50kw...only changed the injectors, fuel pump and ecu. My other mate is running a 160kw getz its running 25psi. And only weights 900kg. Love it! I hope they bring out a factory turbo getz to par with the AMAZING Yaris.
What engine are you running in your Getz? We dont have them here in North America?
Channel just keeps getting better and better, congrats Andrew and co plus those behind the scenes.
Great work.
This car can take on almost anything in a track setting !
Congrats guys and girls! Would love to have a garage to do some of these things to my GR.
That is so impressive, can’t wait to see it on the strip and track down the road !
Very interesting to see car being able to handle so much power with stock block. That said,on the road the car is much better with the stock turbo, with the gt25-550 it spools way too late in the rev range. I would like to see a stock turbo with larger wheels to see of you can get close to 400hp at the crank without loosing too much low rev torque.
100kw per rod factory rods.
Can't wait to see how she goes long term
man you guys are awesome, love the videos, love the on screen presenting. WIN.
Amazing!!! Great in-depth tech perspective
Excellent video!
Australia for the win 👍
Incredible effort guys well done
Could watch this sort of stuff all day awesome car great explanation cool content
After watching the video, I’d say you need to consider stiffer engine mounts too.
the numbers dont surprise me TBH, its a homologation special, just like the Evo, STi, Celica GT4 Escort Cosworth, etc all were.....and you know what they all had? very strongly built engines to go racing with. Great vid as per usual
So the new 1.6 is the 3jz? 😅
1/2JZ
Hehe I’m really loving these little things… awesome to see how capable these little beasts are…
At last im waiting for this! and Andrew you lookin good mate!
Great content guys 😎
That's a good video guys!!
Can someone pls explain why is it safer to archive peak torque higher up in the rev range than lower.
According to me. Torque and cylinder pressures are correlated to each other. Having higher cylinder pressures at a lower rpm will still put the same force on the engine components as it would at higher rpms.
Hi, from what I have experienced, the peak torque is moved due to the larger turbine housing, however, I don't believe that "moving peak torque higher really does make it safer... I could be wrong... Probably. What I do know is that peak torque is the point where the engine most likely to get hurt so... What I do is decide the max power I want from early and get the smallest turbine housing that can support that power but with minimal lag then ramp in the turbo as hard as possible to a lower boost level say 5500 at a lower boost say 12 psi then after that have a smooth line going to 20 psi by 7500rpms. So after "peak torque" the power continues to go up but is smoother and won't "shock" the engine. Result is faster times without traction losses and the car is exceptionally responsive. Mind u it's a starlet with a 5e engine. Hope this helps. As I said this is just my experience.
Exactly how we tuned our GT-R 👍
@@glanzaturbo definitely helps. Thx you so much for such a detailed answer!
What are the reasons you think peak torque is the point the engine is most likely to get hurt? And why putting it higher in the rev range makes the engine safer
You're forgetting that horsepower is torque times rpm. Making the same torque higher in the rev range is spreading it over more cylinder events, therefore cylinder pressure is lower.
@@AndrewNoronha-cb2gy There are a few reasons from my understanding(not a professional) Motive can probably give you a more concise answer but as i said this is my experience in Jamaica where we have 90 octane #sad. Poor fuel quality causes detonation. When dealing with timing advance you will basically make the most torque/power on the brink of destruction. in a well tuned motor we usually carry it as close to that point on the garbage gas until (unfortunately) we get a touch of knock then take off a couple of degrees so its safe and even if we get worst than the 90 octane a gas stations vary in my country (quality wise) detonation causes rods to shake and usually (please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm working with the concept that the fuel map is tuned out properly) and the high cylinder pressure at peak torque can crush the bearings. Sorry for the long response.
so i use a gfb 3005 boost controller that ramps in the turbo aggressively but then only to "Safe" boost level and i use a megasquirt to ramp in the higher level after peak torque progressively for the smoothness and drivability. the other reason i use the gfb is because i like having the 6 different presets to switch depending on road/mood but the concept work the same on all boost levels as the megasquirt allows me to set boost by rpm and tps location so there is no boost spike while cruising on the highway.
No torque number? Excellent video!
No torque number? Did you not watch the video, they display a torque graph.
That was really really interesting..
Amazing! More power then the 380hp Yaris WRC car Ott Tanak and Seb Ogier are driving!!!
They make 380 “calculated engine hp” so probably 330-350 at the hubs
What will the Turbokit Cost with all the needed parts and mapping? Nothing jet on Golebys parts homepage.
Theres on in uk making nore power fendsport have built a monster
Wonder what gives first. Con rod?
yeah , the figures are impressive but its very unlikely to be able to deliver this for a decent period of time... personally i think 340hp on the stock turbo would be the sweet spot.
Response would be significantly better with a .72 rear housing. Whoever decided it needed a .92 wasn't thinking straight.
I was sooo thinking that! but... to their "future proofing" maybe they want eventually 500+ hp which the .72 might have too much backpressure... just a consideration. but yeah if 430 was their end goal then the .72 would have been a better choice in my view.
@@glanzaturbo plenty of g25’s on bigger engines have proven that the .72 is not a restriction and the compressor tops out before the turbine.
@@signal_msw ok great... i'm going with a .49 on my g25-550 for my starlet 1.5, only need 300
@@glanzaturbo Good choice! SR20 with .49 can make over 400whp with super response!
@@signal_msw SWEEET!
Congratulations on the impressive results,
so #1 bigger in-tank aftermarket fuel pump (liter per hour & fuel press at the stock electric pump after & injectors duty cycles?)
#2 larger map sensor (how many bars)??
In addition congratulations on the TOM’s rear ducts waiting for an installation vid along with new hood vent (preferred the WRC’s one than these as the first vent dose it’s job perfectly maybe if you make a comparison trick with orange fiber string or line used with your first vent
Lastly I saw Kelford cams set not sure if there is any gains at low range and the beginning of mid range for a faster spool as well due to the bigger compressor at the new gt25
Can’t wait to see it on track/drag
Seriously I’m thinking about getting one shipped to Egypt. I love the title of the most powerful GR taking it from point the most powerful 3 cylinder engine
I have had a most powerful 1300cc engine G13b SSGTi and most powerful 1.6L B16B boosted Honda’s engine, it’s time for the GR and thanks to you
BTW I wondered if there is any information available about aftermarket high performance forged pistons & rods.
Keep it up guys. 👍
Hi, very impressive. Which Turbine housing is on the g25-550? I'm buying one with a .49 to run on my 5e at 20 psi . Only looking for 300-320hp. I have 266 camshafts and pistons and rods. Should I go with a larger housing. It has management so I can actually ramp the boost in safely to not hurt the motor at peak torque but I want it aggressive without much lag as it's a daily driver. Any additional info would be appreciated. thanks
Andrew have you lost weight you look good mate
Would of thought it needed a 4wd dyno
HKS & G Force GR Yaris in Japan also reached 400hp mark months ago (HKS does use 100 shots of Nitrous for it to reach 450hp), so it's pretty safe to say this 3cyl has a lot of potential in it.
Granted the engine itself was probably designed to be able to run in WRC2/WRC3 as well which makes it able to withstand that kind of power.
I'm surprised how lazy the Garrett is compared to the stock turbo. Of course it's a lot bigger but I would have thought it would come on earlier.
Why is the dyno only connected to the front wheels if it's AWD?
AWD system causes drama on retarder based dynos
@@MotiveVideo so how do you get it to just run the front wheels? Disconnect the drive shaft?
Very cool video! I need to buy one now hahahah
Super cool!
Probably obvious, but did you try making the spark plug gap smaller?
Didn't you guys found any oil pressure drop during hard braking? I've discovered the issue running with the Syvecs and analyzing the logs, then surfed the web and found out it's a common problem..
Really wish they had more cubes. A 2.0L with the same tech would have been the go.
WRC rule requirement is 1.6L
The GR Yaris was intended to enter WRC (at least WRC2 or WRC3) hence the engine has to follow WRC's regulation as well. In WRC2, R5/Rally2 engines are regulated to 1.6l engine limited to 7500rpm, pretty similar to what the 3cyl engine inside the GR Yaris.
Even the AP4 regulation (equivalent to R5) also only allowed a maximum of 1.6l engine as well. Neil Bates Motorsport already made an AP4 GR Yaris which still uses the same engine.
This won't drive / accelerate like a GR Yaris anymore. The boost seems to kick in ALOT later than the stock turbo. BUT, a turbo swap costs money so... going up in turbo size, you need to be smart about it and find the right balance between more power and less lag. So I don't know... but these guys are supposed to be experts. Is this the right turbo-charger to upgrade to? Or something a bit smaller, yet still bigger than the stock turbo, but with better response than this turbo?
Don’t do this to your street Yaris. You also must remember what these guys would have spent RRP to get this car to where it is now. It’s not going to be for every dude in a Yaris that wants a bit more HP. There’s also no telling how long this will last, it’s all a mystery, they can have a million sensors but it can snap a rod or grenade the box/transfers case in a blink of an eye.
I thought the ej series engines looked messy. This thing looks like a bomb went off in the engine bay.
Most modern stuff does 90s jdm era is gone man
Very impressive now lets see if it can beat the HKS yaris with 475hp which is to my knowledge the most powerful since 2020.I believe it even ran 500hp at one time.Still very impressed with the strenght of that small 3 pot.👍
They used NOS.
@@dejan. If anything there's also another GR Yaris in Japan that also reached 400+hp tuned by G-Force with no NOS. They ran the car at Tsukuba Time Attack and nearly beat HKS GR Yaris' lap times as well (around 58.5s), though i remember the car was around 360hp at that time)
Was this in 3rd gear again Andrew? So, how much power in 5th then? It was 20kW higher in 3rd over 5th when you ran into trouble about 6k originally.
Its is in 5Th
Did the car get a new yellow wrap or is it just a color grading issue with the video?
Honestly, this is an advertisement for the advances in OEM manufacturing, Toyota's commitment to building a true rally special and to the benefits of modern electronics. Just imagine trying to screwing 30+ PSI of boost into an unopened 4A-GZE to make +300kW to the hubs...
Wonder how well the OE gearbox will take it or the whole system when it gets hot on the track. Lap after Lap... Or launching on the sticky track
Very impressed, but boy does it need some bigger cams :D
The gearbox is the EA6x series (Aisin BG6), these are also used by the Lotus Evora and the powerful Toyota diesels we had in Europe. They are pretty stout as they are rated to around 400nm I think.
On our chassis dyno we were doing power and torque curves starting from the fuel cut working it down to about 800rpm with a very slow deceleration rate. But we're talking about big 13l diesel inline 6's in 12th gear with lazy turbos :D. Just couldn't measure good enough down low
great video
If you move that bit up there and put that bit down there and move that other bit from down there to up there and add more boost then that bit down there will make more power.
I really hope Toyota brings this engine and drivetrain to the states as some form of Corolla.
I’d literally replace my BMW X3M Competition with it since I haven’t driven it in nearly a year, because it’s just not that exciting to drive even if it makes 650awhp.
If/When that happens, im totally going balls to the wall with the first mods being fuel, ignition, cooling and slightly larger turbo.
Fensport in UK is run the most powerful gr yaris
“calculated engine bhp” we presume?
Insane
Your gonna need a hole in the block sensor lol
They have all the sensors mate, boost and air temp to name a couple. This is zerious
@@sexyfacenation Yuge.
30 mins?? I must have done something right...first 10 comments!! Loving all the projects...looking forward to more from the Yaris
Can't believe that beast is a 3 pot 😳
Just imagine a 6 cylinder version of this engine!
So what, basically a 2JZ? That’s what it would be x2. No I think the future might be these large displacement inline-3 turbo engines. How can you beat the power curves and HP/TQ numbers
Already exists… this platform is half the engine that is used in WEC
So, the engine in the current Supra?
@@chrisdooley6468 No, the NEW Supra engine.
@@ChristopherHallett no. The v6 engine used on the world endurance championship.
430hp so a steady 500bhp, beast
Just.. why?
@@sunrisesunset1734 just why what?
@@stefanroseEP3 Wheel horsepower is all that matters, the rest are just fancy numbers to look bigger and cool.
hks has time attack yaris with 475hp?. Crazy numbers still
Pretty 100 hp come from nitro injection. Without it their car has around 370hp.
@@galerion505 yeah but with that 470hp. And hks is very modest allways with power figures
Japanese dynos are “calculated engine PS” and out experience of bringing cars here and vi e versa is they massively over read. HKS saying 375PS would be lucky to make 300hp at the wheels. No one has seen their dyno graph either
@@MotiveVideo that is True. But they get very good track times with that car which tell there has to be power behind. Usual if whe think gt86 time attack car they say there is 800hp and those track times tell there is over 1000hp..
@@89Heke 1000hp gets thrown around a lot. A legit 1000hp on a dyno we trust, you certainly know about it
i cant see you side on.... but looks like youve lost some weight mate.... nice work
Nice vid!! 💪
but this turbo is way to big
Will you be buying the GR Corolla whe it arrives? Really interested in that! Can it take it to the RS Focuses, Golf R's, and STI's?
Think i read they are using the same 3cyl engine from the Yaris. Was hoping they were developing a 4cyl beast.
@@shanekay8278 would be unlikely.
Thought the new gr garis was awd
Ok so its making 321kw ATW what is the max torque figure Nm?
Divide by the RPM.
@@dejan. huh?
They show you a torque graph, wtf
Yaris GR is fwd? I thought it was AWD no?
It is AWD
Stock Clutch ?
NPC single plate clutch
i think i will run a 32psi spring. on an interal wastegate
Been waiting for this.
Edit: What type of spiteful tonsil do you have to be to give this video a thumbs down.
lol spiteful tonsil....sounds like an acute form of tonsilitis!
With knowing how much power is stock, you could add some more to the low end, but being this is more track focused that bump in the higher top end is quite noticeable.
Regarding E fuels most don't notice much difference past 40-60% content other than fuel use, yes it can be made safer with its properties with tuning, but if you have it available and you have the pump for it, it is never a bad thing. As all packages can react differently with various different limiting factors.
You do realise there's a reason it's so lazy right?
@@scootbmx01 the turbo is big. That's the main reason mate.
@@sexyfacenation you don't say..... 🤦♂️
@@scootbmx01 they said it's how they tuned it , but that's only true to a very small extent. Seems you were implying it is deliberately tuned to be lazy
@@sexyfacenation no, you mis interpreted
I the 430hp crank hp or hub hp?
we NEVER measure engine hp. Always show hub or wheel horsepower.
It's like half of a modernised 2JZ-GTE.
if i put a 19 pound spring in a ventless will i still get 40 pounds
If you block your inlet you'll get 200psi.
Psi is not airmass, its not an accurate measure
This little 3 cylinder is an absolute monster! Do you think it could hit 500hp?
Is that wheel kw/hp guys??
At the hubs. We dont do “calculates engine hp”
Awesome
Love your T shirt
I assume these presented figures are numbers at the wheels?
😂🤣😂
@@trentcrompton9527 ?
Did you watch the video ? .....
@@rntechnologies1112 I did, but I was getting ready while I was watching, so I might have missed some parts. So why be cocky and not just answer my question?
yes
I think the car would be more fun overall with a smaller more responsive turbo. Stock +
The development is impressive. I know Toyota chose a 3 cylinder engine because of weight consideration and purpose built, however i would have preferred a 4AGE 20V turbo engine.
Just wait till it lines up a $2k barra
Would have been better if you did the tuning on ron 98 petrol. Tuning a street car for exotic fuels that arent available for the most part is not real world accurate.
Exotic fuel? E85 is available form the pump in a lot of countries and is the fuel of the future. You can oder 200L drums of it to have at home too.
@@MotiveVideo We are in Australia the same as you are. There are about 6 stations in Melbourne cbd that actually sell it. Tuning should be done with what is commonly available. 98 or lpg or e10. The cars original power was for petrol, Running it on E85 with increased power is not hard.
Nice
If it was in the U.S on there dyno it would be 500kw lol
Curve looks like a rotrex.
I thought that Yaris GR was awd 🤔
It is. Many 4WD cars have to be dyno tuned in 2WD. GR Yaris must be in 2WD on a retarder style dyno.
I sooo want one🙄
I've got a mate who thinks these are Junk n any EVO would destroy one around a track with Similar mods, do you mind proving him wrong please...
We already have
Why not just build the engine?
Our question is why build it if you don’t have to 🤷♂️
Horsepower? What kinda aussie are ya?