Now that JPEG-XS is available now, how does this change? Why route uncompressed video when you can compress it and reduce interconnection costs? e.g. where 25Gb links will work instead of more expensive 100Gb links? XS typically imposes only between 1 and 32 lines of additional end-to-end latency, when compared to the same system using uncompressed video.
Now that JPEG-XS is available now, how does this change? Why route uncompressed video when you can compress it and reduce interconnection costs? e.g. where 25Gb links will work instead of more expensive 100Gb links?
XS typically imposes only between 1 and 32 lines of additional end-to-end latency, when compared to the same system using uncompressed video.