Jack of All Trades: Rosa Mayorga on the Life and Work of Charles Sanders Peirce
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ค. 2024
- Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914) was a polymath whose interests spanned multiple fields including philosophy, astronomy, mathematics, and language. He is best known as “the father of pragmatism,” a school of philosophy whose principle that the usefulness, workability, and practicality of ideas, policies, and proposals are the criteria of their merit.
Rosa Mayorga is Chair in the Department of Philosophy at Miami Dade College and the author of From Realism to ‘Realicism’: The Metaphysics of Charles Sanders Peirce.
She joins us on Culture Insight to share her insight into the life and work of Charles Sanders Peirce.
![TREASURE - 'KING KONG' COMEBACK SPECIAL [THE TREASURE SHOW]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Jx1wyMaQzf0/mqdefault.jpg)
Magnificent overview of the life of a man who has so improved my life as a scientist.
Such an incredibly clear, coherent and comprehensive summary of Pierce's philosophical work! Thank you very much!
Incredible power of synthesis, thanks for this video.
Excellent summary of Peirce! Thank you!
Really enjoyed this synthesis! Well done, what a delight! Thanks Rosa Mayorga.
This is Just the best of Peirce's studies!
Wow! Tremendous conveyor of quality information. Thank you🎉
This is a wonderful work, thank you very much!!
Thankyou for your time..
Peirce is the unsung hero of American philosophy (considering how he influenced James and Dewey) where would we be without him?
This is the most cohesive summary of any philosopher's thought I've heard. Fantastic synthesis. It made me think that Claude Shannon was likely inspired by Peirce when he formulated his "Mathematical Theory of Communication" paper.
Wow. Very good! Very good!
This was great. Thank you
Fabulous 🌹🌹🌹
Very clear and interesting. Thank you!
39:37 organisation of knowledge
58:30 normative philosophpy
1:50:26 semiotics
💗
1:02:05 so, by Pierce’s definition of truth, what happens when two opposing communities exist such that each community opines exactly the opposite (geocentrism versus heliocentrism)? Both cannot be true. We learn through empirical observation that in fact the earth orbits the sun and not the other way around. Would Pierce contend that both communities had their own truth? Also, what really does ‘given enough time…’ really mean?
1:04:32 the problem is that even THIS belief, that any belief can be questioned, can be questioned.
But it is not a problem. A belief, yes. Peirce expresses beliefs. dangerous to be categorical. Ever. And not needed.
I Am Therefore I Think . In case you did not know you is . Is thinks . I am is the cause , not the thinking .
We can think of an idea only after having thought about a previous idea .
When was the fist idea ? What is you is not what thinks !!!
So many examples of brilliant renaissance thinkers who just don’t excel in the halls of academia.
very good
Longitude 127 Seoul Okinawa Soul Axis -- Bahai Faith Rael
Jesus Huh kyung young
Great aletheia