Roger Federer Being *Slightly* ARROGANT But Funny Moments.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ค. 2024
- Sometimes my guy Roger Federer can get a little arrogant during his interviews. Can't blame the man, however, with the number of stupid questions tennis players receive. This is a quick compilation of Federer's funny and slightly arrogant interview moments.
Rafael Nadal's accent and charisma might be some of the best things in the tennis world. This video brings you Rafa's funniest interviews and other nice moments. Roger Federer definitely agrees!
DON'T MISS THE NEW VIDEOS, TURN NOTIFICATIONS ON BY CLICKING ON THE BELL 👉🏼👉🏼 (select "All")
Watch my other videos:
Roger Federer ● Court Level View Best Points: • Roger Federer ● Court ...
Roger Federer’s Most Important Comeback EVER?? || When Federer Was A Man On A Mission:
• Roger Federer’s Most I...
Roger Federer Crushes Nick Kyrgios Hopes and Dreams (Again):
• Roger Federer Crushes ... - กีฬา
![MOBYE - มีใจทำไมไม่จีบ (ASAP) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dCOdz92FU18/mqdefault.jpg)
Remember “We need a clown for this circus”? That was hilarious 😂
Yesss haha so good
Nick Kyrgios :D
For his 20+ year career, I think the most
arrogant thing Federer has ever said was:
“To have a chance against me, you have to feel 100% right now.” - Fed, 2004
Aww where's that one? I wanna see
Oh yea! I dare anyone to counter that logic! Why is that arrogant when he feels he’s speaking 💯 % the truth. He literally was the greatest player alive at that time! He was a bad fucking ass in that time and I believe every word he said. Remember he was sooo dominant around that time he was blowing everyone away. So they had to slow the courts down because he was dominating so bad they wanted more ppl to watch so they changed the game because of HIM!!
plenty of times he was an asshole to judges and crowd. he is human after all but yeah
Im pretty sure hes said far more arrogant stuff lol
This aint it chief. Its probably the one where he lost and was all like “i should be doing the WINNING speech right now” lol
"Do you have any rules in there?" LOL 😂
Hahah
@@RogerThatTennis I bet if Roger was so inclined he could give Johnny Mac a run for his money 😂.
If Federer tells me to change my job i would start crying for the rest of my life😂
Hahaha
That journalist is an italian veteran of the tour. All players know him and is famous for his funny quotes and questions. Is the same who Djokovic told "not too bad" that time and made everyone laugh hahaha. Obviously Roger was teasing him taking advantage from their previous relationship
hes such a classy boss i love him and most of it isnt even arrogance
Exceptional guy
The tennis video game part got me every time 🤣
Too good haha
Did Roger call Rafa "baby" at 2:36 LOL
This is not real arrogance, it’s when you’re feigning arrogance but maybe with a little bit of a cheeky 😃
Hahah right!
Answer question with a question . Works always!!!
Right
1:43 What irony that Federer and Nadal categorically shot down the idea of ending their careers playing doubles -- and then ended their careers playing doubles together. Of course the question wasn't about a single match, but...still funny to look back on.
Just Roger’s, but I guess they did get some inspiration
Great close ups hahah 1:59
Funny Rafa haha
Alternative video title: Ubaldo Annoying Roger Federer.
He gets under the player's skins for sure
The players, especially Federer and Nadal can't stand Ubaldo.😆
I wish he would actually change his job.
@@Revolver1981 Novak loves him.
@@bojanveljovic559 That's because Novak sucks up to Italians because he craves love.
He's a funny witty guy and says it how it is.
Right!
HAHAHAH THAT VIDEO GAMES ONE WAS SO HILARIOUS
Hahah "what do you think?"
Ubaldo exposed by Fed. LMAO. No patience for him at all. Great stuff.
Hahhaa
it was funny moment and federer didnt seems slightly arrogant
Dropping them bombs 3:50
3:47 I was wondering why he was so intense. Then I remembered that’s when Del Potro beat him in the 2009 US Open Final. I was shocked. That would have been a huge win for Roger.
That little smile when Ubaldo starts speaking…you just already know that man is getting dragged no matter what comes out of his mouth ☠️
Hahaha for real
Holy shit I never heard Roger swear, that was incredible 😂 That's the fiery South African in him, love to see it
Sempre adorável. 😘😘😘
Hahaha monstro o Roger!
It's not arrogance when he is rightfully annoyed
Yessirr
ROGER IS DEFINITELY ARROGANT SWISS GUY. LIKE HE SAID, ROGER GETS, WHAT RIGER WANTS. IF THAT IS NOT ARROGANCE., WHAT IS?
@@hyd916 So? Doesn't he deserve that much he has worked hard for it!
Title: Roger b.... slapping stupid journos, and with a smile as well.
Hahaha
Federer is the opposite of arrogance, he is humble and has good manners, he is merely calling those who are arrogant or have bad manners out on their BS..
This isn't arrogance. It's called being right.
Yessirrr
Hatori I think Roger has respect for his own talent and that is why he has worked so hard to hone his skills over all these years.His sense of humour and common sense mean he is not arrogant and of course he was well brought up.
exactly but when Novak is answering in that way then we got other name for that. Give me a fkn break
😂😂😂 fed fans are delusional
Exactly. There is no way Roger could ever be arrogant. My maestro, my god, my one and only dear Roger!! He could say anything and it wouldn't be arrogant. Just pure grace and class both on the court and off.
Novak on the other hand, what an arrogant piece of shit. Every time that guy opens his mouth, nothing but cocky drivel comes out of it. It doesn't matter what he says. Arrogant bastard. For that reason, 20 will always be greater than 23. Because the 20 that roger has is graceful and full of class, just like the way he plays and speaks.
pure class
23 straight Grand Slam Semi Final appearances!! 🐐 record
Yessirr
@@RogerThatTennis novak still goat
@@sonyaknight8321 why do you have to make this about Novak? The guy just said one of Federer's records.
@@sonyaknight8321 How is he the GOAT then.
My guy 😸😸😸👍
Hahha
If Federer played doubles he'd easily be #1 in the world when he played. Federer has the best all-court game we have ever seen. The same could be said for Sampras. McEnroe is a great example.
where was the last from what tournament and what year?
Us Open 2019.
@@RogerThatTennis 2009*
wheres the last one from?!
Song in the background starting at 3:50?
Like a BOSSSSSS!!!!
Yesss
Federer is so cool that he doesn’t seem swiss! 🤣
Savage haha
I miss the salty handshakes when Novak took him behind the woodshed....he was an all time great legend though
I find that first clip so funny Idk why
Too good haha
this is hardly arrogance. it's called not being boring.
You gotta point Maharshi
Roger and Rafa are the most beautiful people I don’t think they were ever arrogant. Being right and having an opinion doesn’t make someone arrogant. Being degrading is arrogant, and HE has NEVER Been that ❤
Plot twist on the 3rd one: "I can play as the real Federer any time. I play as my boyfr... oops i mean my arch-rival Nadal" 😂 I only jest, all respect for the big 3 goats
"Arrogant" Federer public opinion: he's so classy
"Arrogant" Djokovic public opinion: what a jerk
Slightly * Arrogant 😭🤣
Hahahha
4:19 He predicted the future perfectly
That argument he had with the umpire at the 2009 US Open final cost him the match and the following years
Can you explain me how
Did they suspend him from the tournament in following years?
@@hybrid_nb1538 obviously not since he played in 2010, but I'd be interested to know what he meant by that
@@brokehottest8499 He probably meant that Roger let the moment get to him emotionally and he lost focus. The following years though... ???
That's what i don't get about this silly tennis game. How do the let an umpire have so much power? So what if he argued with him? The umpire deserved it. How dare he tell a grown man to shut up?
Many of his comments were in response to ridiculous questions.
It's not arrogance, it's the charm a winner carries.
Yesssir
For a Leo, he's actually quite tame.
Roger does an amazing job of acting professional when the cameras are on him - but I would assume in private he is extremely arrogant and not fun to be around when he's in a bad mood.
I loved when Rafa and Roger played one against the other. They were always very respectful and it was often funny ! For me they will always be the two best players in the world.
Roger is a little arrogant, but who wouldn't be? I see it as having the confidence to call idiotic reporters when they're crap at their job. Is he miffed that Novak had his card years ago, yes but again, who wouldn't be? As Novak has said many times in the past, Roger and Rafa are the reason he has become the player he is today. They forced him to get better physically, mentally, technically and tactically. Unfortunately for them, Novak is a very astute and dedicated learner and scholar of the game. He has taken tennis to a level never seen before...EVER. If I was Federer, I'd be happy for Novak but ever so slightly narked off, hence the ambivalent demeanour he sometimes gives off. I do like his dry sense of humour though.
He's becoming more accepting of the flattery in some sense of Novak's greatness. Those 3 are so unique, this is the amalgamation of sport it's beautiful and anyone can harbour and opinion of they so choose.
Lol Novak highest level? What a joke.
@@handzar6402 Clearly you don't watch tennis.
Poor Ubaldo
Say whatever but RF will always be the most loved player of all time.. For me, he's the GOAT.. ❤️❤️
Many would agree Alex
MOST people agree.
Dont mistake kindness for weakness
He can get away with it, I think he's earnt it. :D
He's a good interview, and his english is superb. Rafa has a lot of dough. he can afford an English teacher. I love him but i can't understand him sometimes. Perhaps it's me.
I think Rafa his good old Spanish haha
THAT IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN TELLING, THAT RAFA NEEDS A GOOD ENGLISH TUTOR . HIS ENGLISH IS AWFUL WITH A THICK SPANISH ACCENT.
its more like critical personality
If I had Won 20 Slams I would be arrogant, problem is when you are arrogant but you can't Back it up.
Agreed Juan haha
Where is a salty conference?
makes sense rogers plays like a squash player that was his first sport before tennis
does they say that in the interview ?
He is not arrogant...he has self awareness and he is confident...
getting excited with the expletives!! 1 for djoki and 4 for Fed and the other class of players in finals for Fed agassi, roddick, etc wins against murray ,nadal.djoki in GS finals 6 out of 20, djoki GS finals wins against fed,murray,nadal 13 out of 20
The best ever
Goat boi
@@RogerThatTennis in ur dreamsssss
The day he n rafa retire ima retiree from watching tennis as well
It will be a sad day :/
@@RogerThatTennis it just won’t be the same it’s like when Kobe retired from basketball rip legend 🏆
@@hafadaze9046 for sure man
In a class all his own. The one and only.
So arrogant but cmon we gotta love this guy.
Arrogant is a rude, cocky person. Roger is just being sincere and honest, nothing arrogant about him..read the dictionary..
"Bro where is your fam?" Nick Kyrgios
@arl business maybe odd no more or less than noval was earlier part but not now none of three stop hating
@arl business inferior and shaken Djocobitch fans always stalking FED videos...Pathetic.
What's up with these reporters who either barely speak English or can barely speak at all?
Player: *isn't a yes man*
Fans: WOW SO ARROGANT
For Roger is not arrogance it’s self-awareness
Hahaha you're right my guy
Yeah the man's arrogance is irritating.
@@Revolver1981 so is your stupidity but I don’t point it out when I don’t have to
@@commondirtbagz7130 He's annoying. His rudeness is unacceptable.
The love between Rafa and Roger is so pure 🥹
Wouldn't say he's arrogant, but he does show mental vulnerabilities
If you’ve had any less success in life than Federer, you’re not qualified to say he’s arrogant.
I have no problem with any of what Roger said but I love how if Novak would do this, it's on every website what a piece of garbage he is.
Accurate haha
Ikr?
You're right, totally hypocritical.
Because Novak's attitude stinks and his style of tennis is boring af. Federer has bad days, sure, like anyone else, but Novak is king of acting like a brat on the court, and then pretending like he gets treated unfairly.
@@handzar6402 everything you just said it's straight up bullsh*t. And btw, his style is not "boring" you're just dumb. You don't know how to watch tennis.
Incredible that those who cover tennis and get paid to do so ... have no idea about the sport. Perhaps they're paid per question.
Hahah imagine that
Not even slightly arrogant..
Very arrogant or not arrogant at all?
Federer haters: Federer has no personality, he is like a robot, who just says nice things. He is so boring. Back in McEnroe-Connors times, players used to be interesting.
Also the Federer-haters: Federer is an arrogant, disrespectful person who mocks journalists and swears while talking to umpires....
Courier isn't a genius either ! McEnroe is the best tennis reporter/ commentator out there , by far !
No one does interviews like Roger. Legend 👑
At 4.20 that reporter was right. Novak has no challenges now..hence he's dominant.
Novak has no challenges? He faced prime rafa, roger, andy, stan, etc, much tougher then blake, hewitt and roddick era
in his interviews he doesn't seem very bright and comes across he is in a beauty pagent
Which is exactly what dominance is, by definition. Once you are so much better than any other current player that could possibly challenge you, it's called dominance.
@@bigbywolf5031 When ND faced RN and RF in their prime, he always was the 3rd of them... 2011 and beyond wasn't RN's prime, and even less RF's prime.
@@bigbywolf5031 Hewitt, Blake and Roddick were amazing players in their primes and Roger had to bring his AAA game to beat them.
Tennis journalists are probably the worst in all of sport but tennis players are babies. Volunteer at a tournament and you’ll see how they are behind the scenes.
could you please explain what you've heard or seen? any examples?
@@adrienlong5311 ... Andy told a lil kid to sod off when the lil boy wanted a pic with him ... fair enough he was warming up or something, but still.
That's nothing comparing to F1 journalists. Some of them are a disgrace for their profession
@@penusliski ho wow! could you detail?
@@adrienlong5311 See for urself. Watch a couple of pre or post race press conferences and you should see the pattern really quickly. The number of stupid and generic questions is shocking. You can see the annoyance and boredom on driver's faces almost constantly.
I like how he handled the question about Djokovic being dominant due to having no great opponents. Actually, the reporter was not so far from the truth, despite phrasing the question rather unpleasantly. We do have a weak Grand Slam era at the moment
Were the players roger faced in the early 2000s weak players because he repeatedly beat them in slams?
@@Retr0Static no, but they were weaker then the players from Djokovic generation, because once Nadal, Murray, Djokovic, DelPotro, etc. started winning they more or less disappeared. Also they would get beaten in the early rounds of slams even way before 2007.
Wait, Rafa being a what??
What part of the video?
@@RogerThatTennis Ubaldo asking them a question, he was like, in 2020 if Roger is too old to play singles anf Rafa is a "something", can they play doubles or something like that.
@@racquettalk6643 got it! I think he said "Rafa being a boy" but that doesn't make a lot of sense.
@@RogerThatTennis wait that makes no sense
@@racquettalk6643 I know haha
roger is very passive and has no real fight like djoki why he choked so many times at crucial points..He seems like he was spoiled at home growing up and on the road as we see the crowds give him too much support ..Rogers has the illussion he is better agaisnt rivals nadal/Djoki and the numbers prove otherwise
djoki only player to hold all GS at one time, only player to win first 3 gs of calaender year and all GS 3 times...You sound very bitter that ur running shoe salesman stats are all gone /disappearing and all u got left onto is popularity, beauty pageant stats!! Fed was ok but weak mentally, weak backhand, didn't think ,didn't evolve his sqaush game , you could see his smarts in his bumbling post match speeches..Not like djoki who held onto his beliefs, had smething to say when he spoke..Fed was just a sell out to big corp to sell his running shoes and watches which u seem to think is important!! Try and focus on tennis!!
you are very cute copying my lines and using big words....Did u buy another pair of fed running shoes yet?
He needs to chill out, hassling an umpire like was uncalled for and it was rude. I wouldn’t let that slide just because he s a great player
4:12 You can see for a second... Federer was so tempted to answer differently but he had to be politically correct and not say "You're right, man" haha. In these years Novak can break all the records with his eyes closed. He can try to be left handed from now on to put some emotion in the tour.
Hahaha
I don't know about that, It's generational and sport naturally morphs throughout the course of time.
@@heathd.m3136 yessirr
Cant picture many tennis players saying that they Agree with that question,,,Especially during a Press Conference interview...Federer was 100% right it was a STUPID RUDE question
it makes sense why fed plays one hander he is just slow and has to play squash shots to try and keep up with Djoki.. Djokovic’s top speed when sprinting more than three meters was 22.38 mph.
In contrast, Federer is about 6 mph slower than him.
Roger, slow?!? You have to be blind, Federer might not be the fastest player, but he is far from slow (ok yea last year he is slower, but in general during his career definitely not), he has always relied on movement efficiency, not on speed. That's why throughout his career he almost always ran a lot fewer meters in total compared to his opponents and for me the biggest reason he has such a long career. Djoko is not that fast either, he is flexible though and often compensates with stretching to get the ball and hit it cleanly
@@alexanderstoyanov7464 nadal and djoki are way faster that is why they get deep into corners and return the ball with pace and depth..roger sticks his racquet out like a squash player on his backhand ..just doesn't have it in him that is why his overall records agaisnt nadal/djoki are not even close
@@alexanderstoyanov7464 . Djokovic’s top speed when sprinting more than three meters was 22.38 mph.
In contrast, Federer is about 6 mph slower than him
@@canski5646 if you are refering to GIGs research from 2016 Roger was 34 then, bet that if you make the same research now Nole will be a lot slower too. I agree, Roger is slower overall, but that's not a negative in my opinion, a negative is his backhand is one handed and not two handed. The biggest negative in matches with Nole and Rafa however is his strategical and tactical plan. Too often he has gone exactly in their type of game and loses as a consequence, for many years against Rafa he continued insiting playing too many inside out forehands on Rafa's forehand for example. Anyway doesn't matter, still, calling Roger slow is definitely not objective, he is slower than Rafa and Nole, but definitely not slow
you right he s not so fast or strong (physically and mentally) but he is the most skilled player in the tennis history that s why he dont need it
ur getting excited again!!..I said the rallies get more exciting if the ball comes back with pace, accuracy deep from the corners ,one handers can't do it unfortunately ..Iplay one handed backhand too I know the feeling!! Hey ,u have a love affair with fed I have said nadal.djoki just more exciting players when they play each other.. U like squash tennis more than I like nadal/djoki play and find a lot more thrilling and they have had epic rallies deep from the corners..
Have you even watched the video? Have you realised that he actually defended Djokovic at 4:14 ? You useless clown.
@@Opisthocoelicaudia00 you sound like roger and need some cuddling
again ur on the wrong video this is tennis not a populatiry contest and only reason fed was populare because big corp marketed him to the armcahair tennis players to sell watches and running shoes
Is he jewish by any chance?
I don't think so Tamil
Roger - apparently u are OLD now and djokovic is dominating more than u... ubaldo asked the right questions... Both the questions were indeed right. Its on u now to prove him wrong.
Just kidding roger... I know u will disprove him.. U r only 40, i know for a fact u r a superman... And even if u dont... Tats so cute.. U have earned it... Hahaha
Wtf is this
@@tyufve746 Bipolar disorder.
@@OmegaMouse haha I actually have bipolar disorder
Its not even arrogance. Its called humor and sense . Unlike novak that is why many people dont like him😂
When did Novak show arrogance? Are you referring to him celebrating after winning, or thinking he is No. 1 when he actually is? LOL
Nah this is arrogance, and normal people never like being treated like they are less worth than someone. You can keep your Federer, I'd rather have Novak's respect and positive attitude to other people any day, who's not only a better tennis player, but a better human being.
Many people like Federer cause he is propped up by the western media and elites. People dislike Novak cause he beat Federer and Nadal both and is on place to not only be the GOAT but also a better human being and a fun guy all round!
Novak doesn't have a sense of humor? Are you high? Roger looks like a wet blanket compared to Joker
@@kkkk288 facts
Slightly? He is super arrogant...
SO GLAD THE AGE OF FEDERER IS OVER
Roger likes selling watches and Novak tries to helps tennis with his PTPA
Used to think he was a decent guy. Now not too much
Why???
corporations /media built roger too high so they could make their millions and the public gobbled it up thinking he was great ..but in the end Novak and Nadal dominatred roger in all stats!!
roger is fading fast and the sponsors and corp will drop him just as fast..public is seeing who is the better player and the stats prove it and Djoki is just a stronger player physically and mentally..created by a much tougher up bringing and to fight a lot harder to get to the top
No surprises there. He's really arrogant and a sore loser. He's a great player but a terrible sportsman.
The few times Rafa tries to be funny, he doesen't get it.......born anthipatic and will always be.
roger never held all four slams at same time, never won all the masters titles(only 28),never won first 2/3 legs of GS calender, never beat nadal at french,never dominated his 2 rivals, his matches were not as epic as Nadal and Djoki because of their 2 handed game in the deep corners, roger chokes and not as smart as Djoki, Fed only won all 4 slams once, Djoki has way more records than Fedex
Lol video has nothing to do with Novak (who is great btw) and yet you comment this. Roger lives in your head rent free lol. I wish Novak’s fans had his humility
@@pacificbutterdo2326 Nole is the 🐐
@@pacificbutterdo2326 humility? not a popularity contest or a pagent this is tennis..roger plays like a squash player and nadal/djoki play epic tennis with their deep ,2 hander return game which is way more thrilling
@@canski5646 why can't you just appreciate all three for what they are all good at. They've all had their time in the sun and people have different favourites. I see your comments everywhere trashtalking Federer, well he has achieved more than you ever will and this isn't even a video claiming he is the GOAT or whatnot and you r here doing ur crap like if u got nothing nice to say don't say it
@@pacificbutterdo2326 humility this is not pagent..called tennis!!
rogers record against Nadal and Djoki is only 30% wins in all their grand slammataches!!! That is very,very low percentages of wins it means he only won 1 of 3 matches agaisnt his rivals ..Where in sport u never domianted ur 2 biggest rivals and ur great!!??
"Officer, can you hear me? ... Yes? ... Listen, officer, this is an emergency. There are some out-of-control tennis fans here chatting about Federer in broad daylight. Our Lord Novak is not getting a single mention. People are walking by like it's nothing... What!? What do you mean, 'join in'?? This is an act of pure, unadulterated evil! ... De minimis non iurat lex? What's that supposed to mean?? The Book of Srdan *clearly* states: "Any sentence featuring the word 'Federer' must immediately proceed to detail why he is a weak-era champion and conclude by declaring Our Lord Novak the GOAT three times. Those who speak Federer's name in rapture are an abomination unto Our Lord. They shall suffer endless trolling and be hounded with great hounds unto the ends of the Web." ... Stop laughing, officer! I demand immediate corrective action or I shall be reporting you to your superiors. I'm already considering a charge of blasphemous mockery of our Scripture. We'll see who laughs last! We shall not rest until we hear your genuflecting submission to his Holiness! Don't you know he's just won Wimbledon? ... What??? You don't know who Novak is? He's the most important thing in the world. He carries the sun in his palms upon its celestial course and it shines only to witness his beauty. His toenails shimmer like the ice-capped peaks of the Alps and are no less lofty. His wind is as the sweet wind of a midsummer night. His balls ... Officer? ... Officer, can you hear me? ... She's gone ... Noledamn Fedtard."
@@molybdaenmornell123hopp5 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 you’re funny…!! Btw, what’s wrong with THAT GUY there? ….
@@molybdaenmornell123hopp5 do you need help? You win the gold medal for delusion
@@stevenjeffery7746 Thank you, Sir, thank you for your kind offer ... Yes, dreadfully deluded lately ... Been imagining outlandish scenarios like the appreciation of caricature.
Pfffffffff
Novak won 8 (and counting!)slams in his 30's and roger 4 and Roger had more experience.. Like Novak said when it was tough against nadal and fedex he changed all his tactics..All roger did was stick to his boring 2 punch,squash playing , same old serve and very weak in the corners..He should have adjusted which a smart player would do>..Roger had his little glory 2003-2009 against a crowd with no threat..No one stands out during those 6 years and 50% of his GS finals were against players ranked above 10 and 80% of novaks and nadals finals in GS finals were ranked below 5.. If want to compare age groups with slam wins Novak had to compete against nadal, murray,wawrinka..basically roger got lucky agassi and sampras were leaving and he came along won , got lots of experience and the threat/challange was not there
What bullshit u should think about the logic lmao. Doesn't rlly matter if he versed ppl outside top 10 (which u have ur facts wrong btw), they must have fought their way through the rounds to the finals as well so they are deserving to be in the finals. What bullshit you can spit out just cuz u cant take the fact that there are other good players besides ur favourite XD
@@alanli2605 Trash talking sounds like u are trashing personally and getting upset from a reality check on ur fav!!!! Using expletives in ur responses all I said were the facts and said I like nadal/djoki 's matches because they are better when it comes to rallies,returns over all game!! If u have other facts please share instead
@@alanli2605 here too!! please respond to my facts with urs and not just they are all great or use expletives...Roger just wasn't that great when u look his matches against nadal/Djoki and his records against them!! He got lucky form 2003-2009 with little threat and once he startyed winning the confidence and skill rose quickly and his competition was weak...along came nadal/djoki,wawarinka, murray and roger only won 5 slams OVER 12 YEARS!!! His squash came can't compete
@@canski5646 you talk absolute shit. Do you even watch tennis. Federer had a lot harder challenges when he was at his prime. Novak just had an aging Federer, injured rafa, and a bunch of young hacks who keep losing in the first 2 rounds. 😂
@@canski5646 ok, first off, ur the one trash talking first on a vid that is praising all the players. YOU are the one who needs to assert for some reason the fact that Djokovic is the GOAT and drag down fed and Nadal. Ofc Djokovic is an amazing player but he doesn’t need fans like you. I’m not wasting my time searching up individual stats on each player when I know that there are all amazing and will all be remembered.
rogers played between 2003 -2009 and won 15 slams( 50% of slam finals the players were ranked above 10) against a very weak era of tennis. He got lot of experince winning and no real threat until nadal, djoki,wawrinka, muuray came along and he only won 5 slams over 12 years!! Djoko won 20 against a way tougher era of tennis
Such bull shit. First of all Nadal started winning major tournaments in 2004/5, so about half of that time Federer had the other best player in history to go up against. Not to mention the players are always amazing in tennis, capable of beating anyone at anytime. This is evidenced by Federer djokovic and Nadal all getting beat by no-names at various times, and losing to people outside of the top 10 a decent amount as well. This was not a very weak era by any means. And third, you wrote: Federer won 15 slams in his athletic prime, and then only 5 slams after his athletic prime! C’mon man…
@@MaximillianNewman don;t have to get excited he won 80 % of skam finals against players ranked above 10,,djoki/ndal had to players ranked below5 for majority of their gs finals
@@MaximillianNewman roger didn't dominate nadal or djoki..he lossed 3 straight finals at wimbledon to Novak his best surface!! Only beat nadal twice on clay!! Djoki beat nadal 7 times on clay and twice at french,,Roger losing H2H against both overall...In grand slam matches rogers has only won 30% agaisnt both!! he is 6 of 13 finals against Novak!! 10 of 14 agaisnt nadal!! you can't be great if ur never dominated ur opponents ..ur rivals dominated you!!!
In 2010-2020 roger was not in his prime cuz he was too old to be in his prime, but Djokovic was in 2011 23 years old while roger was 23 in 2005 where he won 3 slams and lost the final in the 4 th slam against the king of clay. So if roger was 6 years younger he would dominate in 2011-2020, more than novak cuz he is the Greatest of All Time.
@@winstondebaecker9141 Now u are using ifs/hypotheticals for ur /his wishful thinking!! Prime ,Novak won 8 (and counting!)slams in his 30's and roger 4 and Roger had more experience.. Like Novak said when it was tough against nadal and fedex he changed all his tactics..All roger did was stick to his boring 2 punch,squash playing , same old serve and very weak in the corners..He should have adjusted which a smart player would do>..Roger had his little glory 2003-2009 against a crowd with no threat..No one stands out during those 6 years and 80% of his GS finals were against players ranked above 10 and 80% of novaks and nadals finals in GS finals were ranked below 5.. If want to compare age groups with slam wins Novak had to compete against nadal, murray,wawrinka..basically roger got lucky agassi and sampras were leaving and he came along won , got lots of experience and the threat/challange was not there
Still not as bad as Djokovic
Mr 40-15 Chokerer is the most self
-absorbed and entitled snob of all time.
You again. You appear everywhere spewing hate. Go get a real job.
Uh ok?
You’re low key obsessed with Federer
Spreading toxic things and
roger didn't dominate nadal or djoki..he lossed 3 straight finals at wimbledon to Novak his best surface!! Only beat nadal twice on clay and never on french!! Djoki beat nadal 7 times on clay and twice at french,,Roger losing H2H against both overall...In grand slam matches rogers has only won 30% agaisnt both!! he is 6 of 13 finals against Novak!! 10 of 14 agaisnt nadal!! you can't be great if ur never dominated ur opponents ..ur rivals dominated you!!!