As a Franciscan, that priest makes me sad. We should not celebrate gender dysphoria or enable it. We should love them and pray for them, but not embrace their wrong thinking. Thank you for being brave enough to tackle the issue, Trent. I don't think I'd be able to do the subject justice on my own TH-cam channel.
@@AJKPenguin yes, I am a third order secular Franciscan (OFS) in California. Please check out my TH-cam channel. So far I have only offered the daily readings, but I hope to expand content soon.
Brother, do friars use the internet or computers? I've been considering the religious life but I'm not quite weaned off using computers for entertainment.
@@HolyKhaaaaan it depends on the order. Some do have limited computer time. Check out the TH-cam channel "Breaking in the Habbit." It is ran by an amazing Franciscan Friar. Above all, pray and ask God to guide you in discerning your vocation. Pax et bonum and God bless.
I’m sorry you have to dredge into the NCR for your research, but thanks for making videos like this to hopefully prevent some of our brethren from wandering away from the faith!
I have a friend that is same sex attracted and Catholic and he believes that contraception, putting on dresses and having sex with men and women outside of marriage is ok. Priests like this and Fr Martin scare me the most because my poor friend if I bring up that his lifestyle is not Catholic he can just bring up Fr Martin and ignore me.
For people that put animals on the same level as humans, I use the "roadkill" test. And it usually gives them insight into how they truly feel about animals and humans. If you are driving down a road and see a dead animal on the side (most likely having been hit by a vehicle) would you have the same reaction if instead that animal was a human? I've never heard anyone I've asked, including some hardcore animal rights activist, say there wouldn't be a difference in their reaction or feeling. And that shows us the truth, even if both deserve respect, kindness, and love, animals are not on the level of humans.
I love it. Thank you. I'd stop and bury any human (or call the police and/or the coroner, knowing they'd be buried...). I'd only bury my family pet or the plough horse (and I don't have pets or a plough horse) which fits, knowing the true purpose of non-human creation.
@@l21n18 Interesting. Unfortunately there is only one way to find out if that's true, and I hope you or I or anyone never have to come across a dead human on the side of the road. I just find it fascinating that your reaction to seeing a squirrel or bird having been killed by a vehicle would be no different if instead it was a human being. Would your actions be any different? Would you pull over or keep driving for the human and animal alike? Would you call the authorities in both situations? Or would it just be more of an internal indifference to both cases? Either way, thanks for being the first person I've heard (or read) say there is no difference to them, as long as it is a honest assessment to the conundrum.
@@annaskele628 I don't disagree with what you're saying (minus the first two sentences). I even stated in my original comment that animals do deserve our respect and yes, reverence for God's creation. Still, it's difficult to perceive that I would have the same reaction to a dead animal on the side of the road as opposed to a human being in the same condition. I can acknowledge that it could potentially have something to do with the frequency of both circumstances. I see a lot of roadkill where I live. But I'm not indifferent to it. It's never a positive experience, but deep down I know that feeling would be amplified a thousand fold if that was a human being and I hope never have to come across that and I believe and know a lot of people would feel the same... Since humans are made in the image of God, it should be more traumatic to see a human killed than any other animal. Not saying the latter is never traumatic but there has to be a degree of difference. Just like there's a difference between killing a plant (scientifically demonstrated to have different forms of intelligence) and an animal, there's a difference between killing a animal and human, if not for any other reason than personal(species) bias. Again I agree, no matter what, reverence for creation is a, if not the, way to honor God.
If animals are "like people", then when an animal kills, bites, or permanently hurts a human person can that animal (whether it's a dog, cat, horse, tiger, wolf, shark, monkey) go to prison or be tried in a court of law? 🤔🙄
Ha ha. Reminds me of middle ages where I believe some animals were literally tried in a court of law. Thou most wicked and foul chicken, thou wilt pay for thy pecking, farmer Geoffrey's eye!
@@l21n18 Ok, so when/if an animal reaches the age of accountability and attacks a human should they be given their Miranda rights and tried in a court of law?
I mean, that's not really a good argument. I don't think you would put a dependent child or a disabled spouse or parent at a sub-human level; they would all be equally human.
Biological sex*. Gender is just social construct. It's doesn't exist. There is only sex and that's it. I'm not sure gender needed to be invented (by John money) in the first place.
you know that spreading falsehoods is a sin? If so, then why are you lying? We are entities with a souls, we are not in fact nothing more than sex. On the offshoot: "biological gender" is an oxymorone.
@@Mish844 I don’t think biological gender is an oxymoron. Historically, gender is a synonym of sex. It’s actually even more connected to the sexual difference than people think because the prefix “gen-“ denotes to produce, to be born, birth so it has to do with sexual difference. Speak to evolutionary biologists and they will confirm that gender is inextricably linked to sexual difference. A species with one sex would no come up with the concept of gender, yet humans do because we know there is more than one sex. Gender cannot exist on its own as a concept without the concept of sex or the sexual difference
@@AnestheticsForAna yes, historically. The language slightly changed in usage since ancient times, regardless of your sympathies and as a result gender is no longer strictly biological in its usage jsut like whale is not considered a fish today.
St. Mary’s College where Fr. Dan Horan teaches has an LGBTQ+ Center. It is sad to think we now have to scrutinize what is going on wherever we decide to send our children, including Catholic Universities.
I can't believe that these colleges refer to themselves as Catholic and priests like Fr. Dan Horan and Fr. James Martin. They are definitely not aligned with Roman Catholic catechism. So sad! Our Lady pray for us! Sacred Heart of Jesus have Mercy on us! 🙏🏼
This is one reason I will probably steer my children toward public colleges. I'd rather they be in Babylon with their eyes open than in a pasture with false shepherds.
@@jdotoz the indoctrination at public colleges is pushed hard. They won't be any better off even with the mindset "well at least it's not co fusing because its not sanctioned by a church school" Look up the Newman List of Catholic colleges. There are some truly excellent ones. Franciscan, Benedictine, University of Dallas, University of Mary, and a few others I'm forgetting
This is what happens when the Church starts doing things to try to fit in with the world instead of promoting the truth and allows snakes inside. I bet this priest isn’t the only one. Sad sad sad
If the Church does that it becomes Episcopalian...LOL...but the Church will never fall...the gates of hell will NOT prevail...but sinners in the Church will cause drama, chaos, and confusion....they will not prevail because Christ wins.
This priest was promoted at my parish is Seattle and NW region to join a seminar on Catholic approach to racism. I was shocked at this promotion based on what he was promoting. Straight from the secular “word speak” and philosophy. Totally heretical. Thanks for bringing this subject up and this “priests” ideas. He needs to be exposed and stopped within the Catholic Church. Trent, take a look at some of these seminars available on TH-cam. Truly shocking and disturbing from a Catholic perspective.
I have been following the activity of this priest for many years online. He has written numerous articles laced with freemasonic languge and has done this for years.
@@cjgodley1776 That's the sad part. Most likely Fr. Horan is known to some degree in the US and even in Western Europe in Catholic circles. No one does anything because most likely those in charge or see him are of the "Spirit of VII" types.
Because they want to be the next Gandhi or Mandela or something, and think they can singlehandedly save the oppressive institutional Church from its outdated bigotry (by teaching heterodoxy). And so they become priests to try and rework the system from within.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he is aware. I was talking to this gay guy who used to call himself a bad Catholic, and after finally opening up to me about his sexuality he seemed to be more comfortable telling me about what he believed about everything. And he told me some wild things, mostly things to justify his homosexuality, but he unified all the ideas under Gnosticism, using that word. He never said if he got that from the priests he’d hang out with, but he kept emphasizing that most priests and nuns are gay and a lot of the anti Catholic ideas he has he got from them. He wouldn’t say that like an accusation or to blame them, he was trying to use them as an authority.
@@crobeastness My understanding from our conversation is that they are active in their homosexuality. He could have been lying to me, but that wasn't the sense I got.
This guy is absolute nuts and he's probably never seen this; God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. Genesis 1:27
I remember having Fr. Horan at my CINO college for two Masses of the Holy Spirit during my Freshman and Junior years. He seemed okay the first time but he started to get kinda woke my Junior year. I will say, though, since he started to get publicly woke on social media, he hasn't been back. I'm thinking maybe someone put a word in to the school to have them stop (Bishop maybe or a shareholder fearful of losing any kind of diocesan support). Also, I'm almost certain his particular OFM Province was heavily sponsored by ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick. Coincidence?
My dog was put to sleep just a couple of days ago. He was very sick and demanded a lot, financially and emotionally, from my family. I had to make the difficult decision. I have to say, I had second thoughts on my decision. Thank you Trent for clarifying what the Church says about this issue.
I’m so sorry about your loss may you see him again 🙏🏼✝️🕊 there is no shame in admitting that he/she was like family to you and you made the best choice for that little one so they would not have to suffer as their Stewart God bless ❤️🙏🏼
Everyone here should know, in case there are people who don't.... Father Casey from the TH-cam channel "Breaking In The Habit" is a close friend of Father Dan Horan. Father Casey shares all the same beliefs. He refuses to denounce any of them but he is very nuanced in his approach..... many faithful Catholics watch Breaking In The Habit and don't realize.
New Ager Fr Richard Rohr OFM is the trail blazer for such heterodox nonsense. I love the Francisn order (OFM) and dearly hope it doesn't succumbed to radical progressivism and militant social justice.
How come babies in the womb don’t get personhood when the definition of a fetus is offspring , Child I thought humans were persons. Now we are arguing to give personhood to animals before we can give it to babies in the womb. Mind you I love animals so much but I realize that animals can be a tool to help you socially in life you must also love the human.
The problem is that misgendering a Bishop wouldn't just be offensive, it'd be confusing, and would lead to people believing YOU were addled in the brain. If someone complained about Sr Mary I'd not know who they meant. If they called a Bishop "she" I'd think they were genuinely mistaken or possibly talking about some weird Episcopalian thing.
The first problem was publishing this in the Reporter. Where are the bishops when it comes to reigning in these ideas? It is one thing to debate within an intellectual circle, it is another thing to promote it like this to an already poorly catechized population. Thank you for this video Trent!
Totally agree! Where are the Bishops. So much of this nonsense is getting put out by these “priests”. Richard Rohr is another heretic. They should be silenced or leave the priesthood. I’m tired of the lackadaisical control of these men’s (and) women using the Catholic name to promote these ideas. Step up Bishops. It’s your job.
Forget where I saw it, but the Bishop of the Diocese where NCR is based has revoked their ability to use Catholic in their title but they are in defiance of him. I agree though, bishops should do more all over the place in calling this terrible evil out.
Donkey sanctuaries and animal sanctuaries etc etc,should not exist unwanted animals should be put to sleep, the money saved on their upkeep should be spent on mankind, we treat animals like humans and prefer them to having children.
Ok then go to the first or third world countries and stop them having 8 children per family 🤣🤣🤣😂,good luck with that, and once again thanks for the laughs
It's astounding and honestly scary how someone with these easily refutable and honestly quite dumb arguments could have been given a doctorate in systematic theology.
@@colepriceguitar1153 Getting doctorates in systematic theology never was infallible, nor does the Church claim that it's infallible. Only very particular documents can be called infallible in Catholicism. Our dear nut-priest Trent so soundly refutes does not represent Catholic Church teaching at all. Infallible Church teaching only includes very specific documents released by the Pope about once every hundred years or so (more sometimes depending on the time period). This priest is definitely not covered by it; nor is his doctorate.
I don't know how anyone can read scripture and find it compatible with a strong animal rights view. From animal sacrifice to Jesus sending demons into pigs, animals are consistently portrayed as creatures that can be used as means to an end, which is inconsistent with personhood. There are verses that say nice things about them (his eye is on the sparrow), but they're never on the same level as humans.
Franciscan, definitely does not mean what it once did. May God have mercy on Fr Horan's soul. I'm a new Catholic and am stunned at this kind of stuff within Mother Church. The Bride's dress certainly seems torn and besmirched, thankfully Christ deeply loves His Bride even when she falls in the mud of modernism. Thank You Jesus. Sanguis Christi, miserere nobis. Deus Vult
Names I understand depending on the reason for change. This guy is a quake he is so woke it is sad. He needs to be disciplined. It’s so infantile. The Pope should do something however I fear it would be in the affirmative of these people….We need to pray desperately for the Church and the Pope.
The best point I took away from this is the analogy that you should not affirm a thin anorexic person's false belief that they are grossly overweight. That is not loving, that is obviously harmful.
My given name is Lynn and I am married to Tracey. Many people in the course of my life have mistaken our genders, and assumed that I am a wife and Tracey must be a husband when they have it backwards. I don't get upset when this mistake is made. No one has meant to hurt me or my wife so why should I find offense where none is intended?
Good for you. Sometimes people just get upset over anything, especially if it's a trending social issue that they may relate to them to some degree. In the UK, the name Ashley is unisex, where many boys have it as their name. In the US, Ashley is predominately seen as a girls name. Lynn and Tracey are also unisex names in the US, though not as common. I am a non-white where my complexion is sometimes mistaken for Chinese, Mexican, or Japanese. I am neither of those. I do not get upset when strangers guess my ethnicity incorrectly.
Priests need to stop assuming that they can determine what is and is not sinful. The virtue of their office does not afford them some special privilege by which they can substitute their own ideology for the mind of God. God is eternal. He does not change for our time. We need to orient our thinking to his will.
@@Mish844 Have any proof of what you say? Seems to me you're rather fascinated by Horn despite disagreeing with him and other "apologists." Let me ask you, are you a Catholic?
@@TickleMeElmo55 I am fascinated. Or at least interested, because as much as disinterested as I wish I was, this kind of christian fundamentalism is a poison that spills over USA and reaches the most antiintellectual circles even in Europe, emboldening most depraved catholics even here, in Europe. And Trent's ideology isn't exactly hidden. His entire channel is made, to my knowledge, to further interests of christian apologetics. It's about as clear as ideology activism can get, even if limited to internet. No, I'm not. Not anymore, I left the church around a decade ago. My occasional presence here is out curiosity.
this is the spirit of Vatican II....it's not Vatican II but IT IS the spirit of Vatican II...thanks Paul VI and John-Paul II for allowing the early stages of the modernist madness which has led to this
Very good insight. The layman has very deep insight on reality, but the priest of God, who is supposed to be a spiritual and moral guide is living under the diabolical disorientation of the devil. Let’s pray for the shepherds to see clearly. There is too much darkness.
If persons are entitled to have sex, then both human an non human persons are allowed to have sex. Together. It is only a short distance from sodomy to sodomy.
Oh, Franciscans.. where has your mission gone? So many priests focus on this nonsense while there are so many who are struggling with something real. Arguing about this kind of garbage discredits the Church
NCReporter was once a reputable newspaper. And the Franciscans aren't typically this heterodox but they always have had outliers. Uncertain how Lawrence of Brindisi, Bonaventure, Padre Pio, and Francis of Assisi would say if they were in his monastery. The balderdash makes the Jesuit order look sane and, contrary to accurate stereotypes, a lot of SJ is on good footing with orthodoxy; it's not necessarily back to the roots of the order, before and during suppression, but we'll take it in stride. One day the heterodox of that order will not have power or platform; it probably won't happen in my lifetime but here's to orthodoxy.
Lol @ "Bran", it's a very old name, found in Old Welsh and Irish myths and histories. You're spot on about the golden rule: any Christian should want to be reconciled to the Lord, so must want the truth in all things. Well addressed overall.
Fe Daniel Horan is one of those pretentious Franciscans that scarcely wears the habit because “it’s not what St Francis would’ve done if he was in our time” He also fiercely criticised the Church teaching on sexuality when the Vatican wrote against blessing of gay unions
I can't believe that these colleges refer to themselves as Catholic and priests like Fr. Dan Horan and Fr. James Martin. They are definitely not aligned with Roman Catholic catechism. So sad! Our Lady pray for us! Sacred Heart of Jesus have Mercy on us! 🙏🏼
It would probably be better to say true Catholicism vs false Catholicism. Faithful Catholicism vs unfaithful Catholicism. Liberal Catholicism is just not Catholicism at all.
As a Franciscan, is it possible to request that Fr. Horan adopts a consistent ideological framework for identifying himself as a specific kind of Franciscan to avoid inadvertently associating the rest of us with his views?
fr. dan horan gave a talk at my university about climate change and racism, and it was an utterly depressing experience. he is a decent person, but so wrong about our faith and is truly a disgrace that others think he represents our faith
So how can he be a decent person , while abusing his office and title for his own agenda ? how many souls has this "decent person " led astray by his deliberate incompetence ?.
he just seems like a kind and genuine person, but obviously leading others a stray is horrible. i'm not trying to defend what he says, but he is just a person that has yet to encounter the full truth of Christ
Acts 21 And it came to pass that after we had parted from them and had launched, we came on a straight course unto Coos, and the day following unto Rhodes, and from thence unto Patara. 2 And finding a ship sailing over unto Phoenicia, we went aboard and set forth. 3 Now when we had sighted Cyprus, we left it on the left hand, and sailed to Syria and landed at Tyre, for there the ship was to unload her burden. 4 And having found disciples, we tarried there seven days. They told Paul through the Spirit that he should not go up to Jerusalem. 5 And when those days there had been accomplished, we departed and went our way; and they all brought us on our way, with wives and children, until we were out of the city. And we kneeled down on the shore and prayed. 6 And when we had taken our leave one of another, we boarded ship, and they returned home again. 7 And when we had finished our course from Tyre, we came to Ptolemais and saluted the brethren, and stayed with them one day. 8 The next day, we who were in Paul’s company departed and came unto Caesarea, and we entered into the house of Philip the evangelist, who was one of the seven, and lodged with him. 9 And this man had four daughters, virgins, who prophesied. 10 And as we tarried there many days, there came down from Judea a certain prophet named Agabus. 11 And when he had come unto us, he took Paul’s girdle and bound his own hands and feet, and said, “Thus saith the Holy Ghost, ‘So shall the Jews at Jerusalem bind the man who owneth this girdle, and shall deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles.’” 12 And when we heard these things, both we and those at that place besought him not to go up to Jerusalem. 13 Then Paul answered, “What mean ye to weep and to break mine heart? For I am not only ready to be bound, but also to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus.” 14 And when he would not be dissuaded, we ceased, saying, “The will of the Lord be done.” 15 And after those days we took up our baggage and went up to Jerusalem. 16 There went with us also certain of the disciples of Caesarea, who brought with them one Mnason of Cyprus, an old disciple, with whom we were to lodge. 17 And when we had come to Jerusalem, the brethren received us gladly. 18 And the day following, Paul went with us unto James, and all the elders were present. 19 And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles by his ministry. 20 And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord and said unto him, “Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are who believe, and they are all zealous for the law. 21 And they are informed about thee, that thou teachest all the Jews who are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, nor walk according to the customs. 22 What is therefore to be done? The multitude must surely come together, for they will hear that thou art come. 23 Do therefore this which we say to thee: We have four men who have taken a vow upon themselves. 24 Take them and purify thyself with them, and bear their charges with them, that they may shave their heads; and all may know that those things of which they have been informed concerning thee are nothing, butthat thou thyself also walkest orderly and keepest the law. 25 And as to the Gentiles who believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication.” 26 Then Paul took the men, and the next day, purifying himself with them, he entered into the temple to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until an offering should be offered for every one of them. 27 And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews who were from Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people and laid hands on him, 28 crying out, “Men of Israel, help! This is the man who teacheth all men everywhere against the people and the law and this place, and furthermore brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place.” 29 (For they had seen previously with him in the city Trophimus an Ephesian, whom they supposed that Paul had brought into the temple.) 30 And all the city was moved and the people ran together, and they took Paul and dragged him out of the temple; and forthwith the doors were shut. 31 And as they went about to kill him, tidings came unto the chief captain of the garrison that all Jerusalem was in an uproar, 32 who immediately took soldiers and centurions and ran down unto them; and when they saw the chief captain and the soldiers, they left off beating Paul. 33 Then the chief captain came near, and took him and commanded that he be bound with two chains, and demanded who he was and what he had done. 34 And some cried one thing, some another, among the multitude. And when he could learn nothing with certainty because of the tumult, he commanded him to be carried into the castle. 35 And when Paul came upon the stairs, so it was that he had to be borne by the soldiers because of the violence of the people. 36 For the multitude of the people followed after, crying, “Away with him!” 37 And as Paul was about to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, “May I speak unto thee?” And he said, “Canst thou speak Greek? 38 Art not thou that Egyptian who prior to these days madest an uproar and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men who were murderers?” 39 But Paul said, “I am a man who am a Jew of Tarsus, a city of Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city; and I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people.” 40 And when he had given him leave, Paul stood on the stairs and beckoned with his hand unto the people. And when there fell a great silence, he spoke unto them in the Hebrew tongue, saying:
Dude, you need to interview somebody like Gunter Bechly. Your acceptance of Darwinian Theory and that we are also stardust (as Sagan declared) is a mistake.
All theologians need to return to tradition. If they are not happy with the traditional teachings of the church get out, and stop trying to change it to your liking.
Is there a link to the study showing that depression among LGBT people has increased over the past few years including in countries that are very accepting of them?
Eastern mysticism has invaded the thinking of the Catholic Church since Thomas Merton and pope Francis has promoted his views and opinions on eastern mysticism in the Catholic faith
@@asdfasdf3989 Jesus is the way the truth and the life and nobody can go to heaven except through Jesus, eastern mysticism has nothing to do with Jesus and therefore eastern mysticism is demonic in nature. There is no salvation outside of the catholic and apostolic church.
The crazy thing about this is how quickly it creeped up on us, consider, the sitcom Scrubs from the 00's was without any doubt a sitcom with a generally left wing point of view, and a running joke on that show was Doctor Cox calling JD, John Dorian, by girl's names, in every episode, he calls him by a different female name, it was a hilarious bit, but today it would be called 'misgendering' and condemned as hate speech
If you think that’d be totally un-PC, try many of the old sitcoms & cartoons of the past…All in the Family comes to mind…&…I still love the old shows. Throw in Last Man Standing…
@@kainosktisis777there is certainly a lot that the modern woke left finds offensive but my point is how quickly the standard changed. Another example of a left leaning show that is now "offensive" is Friends
@@kainosktisis777 Creator Martha Kauffman has recently been going in an "apology tour" apologizing for the alleged 'racism and transphobia" in the show. It is "racist" because all of the main 6 characters are white, even though they were clearly cast not due to their race but for their chemistry and how well they played off each other. The "transphobia" refers to the jokes about Chandler's dad being a gay transvestite, and the "misgendering" of him as male, even though the show never at any point implied that he was transgender, he was just a transvestite
On the topic of names, I'm thinking of naming one of my future daughters "Bllanca," but only if I am successful in my move to Chile where it'll be pronounced right; I'm naming this possible future daughter thus, because it would be closer to the meaning of the name Bianca which is "white," "blanca" in Spanish.
The real St. Francis of Assisi was a true follower of the Lord with a sense of conviction and righteousness. The man was nothing short of a badass. He tried building a church by himself, brick by brick. He gave a sermon to the birds when no one else would listen. He went right into Muslim territory to try converting the Sultan. Sadly, he’s been co-opted by hippies. Loving God’s creation and finding beauty in it is quite different from worshipping it.
This was a good episode, but I just listened to the "Free For All Fridays" one with your two boys. Hilarious. Enjoy them while they're still so young. :)
Wonder would happen if I identified as emperor. It could hurt my feelings very much if someone denied my proper title «cesar». I could perhaps also consider being the «all-wise» or «all-knowing» just for fun. If someone gave into it, they could not deny me my right to deny others their right😀 - after all I would emperor and all-knowing
This priest - Fr. Horan - has repeatedly written articles laced with freemasonic symbolism and language. It would not surpise me in the least if he was a freemason seeking to undermine the church from within.
@ 12:05 - 12:11 Well, if they will use the Golden Rule, then we should use the GODLY Rule: 1st, YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL OF YOUR MIND, HEART, SOUL, AND SPIRIT, STRENGTH OR MIGHT! 2nd, YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR(S) AS YOURSELF! Take Note, based from the two commandments, YOURSELF is the final word, meaning, IT must come Last as GOD must come First... @ 11:57 - 12:03 Why is there so much resistance and pushback among some in the LGBTQ+ community - including in personal level - to using the gender duties or gender affirming roles referred by the Son of Man, especially by Him who is the Father of the Son of Man? Why are same-sex couples so resistant? Why do they not support God by referred roles and duties?
Re names: I won't yield on pronouns but I will on names. A name is somewhat more arbitrary and need not even necessarily be gendered; there are enough gender-neutral names out there like "Leslie" or "Evelyn" that I can generally go along. Take, for example, the fictional "boy named Sue." Sue's father had the authority to name him, so that became his actual name. As an adult, Sue obtained the authority to rename himself. At that point, he could remain Sue or become Larry or even something strange like Jeep or Espn. But we would usually recognize the choice either way.
As a Franciscan, that priest makes me sad. We should not celebrate gender dysphoria or enable it. We should love them and pray for them, but not embrace their wrong thinking. Thank you for being brave enough to tackle the issue, Trent. I don't think I'd be able to do the subject justice on my own TH-cam channel.
Are you a Secular, OFS?
If you don't mind me asking?
I know a lady in Wisconsin who is OFS.
@@AJKPenguin yes, I am a third order secular Franciscan (OFS) in California. Please check out my TH-cam channel. So far I have only offered the daily readings, but I hope to expand content soon.
Brother, do friars use the internet or computers? I've been considering the religious life but I'm not quite weaned off using computers for entertainment.
@@HolyKhaaaaan it depends on the order. Some do have limited computer time. Check out the TH-cam channel "Breaking in the Habbit." It is ran by an amazing Franciscan Friar. Above all, pray and ask God to guide you in discerning your vocation. Pax et bonum and God bless.
@@AJKPenguin His name is "Brother" so probably a Franciscan friar. I'm a Secular Franciscan.
The kind of people who think ticks have personhood are the same people who argue that an unborn child lacks it
I’m sorry you have to dredge into the NCR for your research, but thanks for making videos like this to hopefully prevent some of our brethren from wandering away from the faith!
I have a friend that is same sex attracted and Catholic and he believes that contraception, putting on dresses and having sex with men and women outside of marriage is ok.
Priests like this and Fr Martin scare me the most because my poor friend if I bring up that his lifestyle is not Catholic he can just bring up Fr Martin and ignore me.
He reads NCR so we don't have to. Thank you, Trent!
For people that put animals on the same level as humans, I use the "roadkill" test. And it usually gives them insight into how they truly feel about animals and humans. If you are driving down a road and see a dead animal on the side (most likely having been hit by a vehicle) would you have the same reaction if instead that animal was a human? I've never heard anyone I've asked, including some hardcore animal rights activist, say there wouldn't be a difference in their reaction or feeling. And that shows us the truth, even if both deserve respect, kindness, and love, animals are not on the level of humans.
I love it. Thank you. I'd stop and bury any human (or call the police and/or the coroner, knowing they'd be buried...). I'd only bury my family pet or the plough horse (and I don't have pets or a plough horse) which fits, knowing the true purpose of non-human creation.
There wouldn’t be a difference for me
@@l21n18 Interesting. Unfortunately there is only one way to find out if that's true, and I hope you or I or anyone never have to come across a dead human on the side of the road. I just find it fascinating that your reaction to seeing a squirrel or bird having been killed by a vehicle would be no different if instead it was a human being. Would your actions be any different? Would you pull over or keep driving for the human and animal alike? Would you call the authorities in both situations? Or would it just be more of an internal indifference to both cases? Either way, thanks for being the first person I've heard (or read) say there is no difference to them, as long as it is a honest assessment to the conundrum.
@@l21n18 You would do deratizaton or desinsection in your house but you wouldn't burn house full of squatters, I think things are pretty clear.
@@annaskele628 I don't disagree with what you're saying (minus the first two sentences). I even stated in my original comment that animals do deserve our respect and yes, reverence for God's creation. Still, it's difficult to perceive that I would have the same reaction to a dead animal on the side of the road as opposed to a human being in the same condition. I can acknowledge that it could potentially have something to do with the frequency of both circumstances. I see a lot of roadkill where I live. But I'm not indifferent to it. It's never a positive experience, but deep down I know that feeling would be amplified a thousand fold if that was a human being and I hope never have to come across that and I believe and know a lot of people would feel the same... Since humans are made in the image of God, it should be more traumatic to see a human killed than any other animal. Not saying the latter is never traumatic but there has to be a degree of difference. Just like there's a difference between killing a plant (scientifically demonstrated to have different forms of intelligence) and an animal, there's a difference between killing a animal and human, if not for any other reason than personal(species) bias. Again I agree, no matter what, reverence for creation is a, if not the, way to honor God.
If animals are "like people", then when an animal kills, bites, or permanently hurts a human person can that animal (whether it's a dog, cat, horse, tiger, wolf, shark, monkey) go to prison or be tried in a court of law? 🤔🙄
Ha ha. Reminds me of middle ages where I believe some animals were literally tried in a court of law.
Thou most wicked and foul chicken, thou wilt pay for thy pecking, farmer Geoffrey's eye!
@@Chamindo7 hahaha 😂😆😂
Not only humans are held to the same standard, is a 1 month old baby punished for its actions? Even in Catholicism, you have an age of accountability.
@@l21n18 Ok, so when/if an animal reaches the age of accountability and attacks a human should they be given their Miranda rights and tried in a court of law?
@@l21n18 Yeah, because there are a lot of 1 month old babies that break the law.
My pronouns are sire/his majesty/your eminence
heh heh
i actually always say "your majesty" when people ask for my pronouns. they don't love it.
@@heliantaflores933 Thats because they are transphobic bigots who dont respect your gender identity ;)
😁
"M'Lord" will be sufficient
Thanks for the common sense Trent. Can we all pray for this priest please?
Pray for him? How about you enforce basic discipline and defrock him?
I pray the priest repents from promoting gender dysphoria and instead help preach to ppl their real God-given identities
Once my cat gets a job and starts paying bills and helping with chores I'll place her equal as humans.
I mean, that's not really a good argument. I don't think you would put a dependent child or a disabled spouse or parent at a sub-human level; they would all be equally human.
@@jdotoz But the cat would neither be disabled, nor a child.
@@enammemberseptember7366 No, but that's what makes it a bad argument.
Misgendering people is a sin: leading someone to believe they are anything but their biological gender on purpose is sinful.
Biological sex*. Gender is just social construct. It's doesn't exist. There is only sex and that's it. I'm not sure gender needed to be invented (by John money) in the first place.
you know that spreading falsehoods is a sin? If so, then why are you lying? We are entities with a souls, we are not in fact nothing more than sex. On the offshoot: "biological gender" is an oxymorone.
@@Mish844 did you know transgenderism is a heresy?
@@Mish844 I don’t think biological gender is an oxymoron. Historically, gender is a synonym of sex. It’s actually even more connected to the sexual difference than people think because the prefix “gen-“ denotes to produce, to be born, birth so it has to do with sexual difference. Speak to evolutionary biologists and they will confirm that gender is inextricably linked to sexual difference. A species with one sex would no come up with the concept of gender, yet humans do because we know there is more than one sex. Gender cannot exist on its own as a concept without the concept of sex or the sexual difference
@@AnestheticsForAna yes, historically. The language slightly changed in usage since ancient times, regardless of your sympathies and as a result gender is no longer strictly biological in its usage jsut like whale is not considered a fish today.
St. Mary’s College where Fr. Dan Horan teaches has an LGBTQ+ Center. It is sad to think we now have to scrutinize what is going on wherever we decide to send our children, including Catholic Universities.
Absolutely
I can't believe that these colleges refer to themselves as Catholic and priests like Fr. Dan Horan and Fr. James Martin. They are definitely not aligned with Roman Catholic catechism. So sad! Our Lady pray for us! Sacred Heart of Jesus have Mercy on us! 🙏🏼
This is one reason I will probably steer my children toward public colleges. I'd rather they be in Babylon with their eyes open than in a pasture with false shepherds.
@@jdotoz the indoctrination at public colleges is pushed hard. They won't be any better off even with the mindset "well at least it's not co fusing because its not sanctioned by a church school"
Look up the Newman List of Catholic colleges. There are some truly excellent ones.
Franciscan, Benedictine, University of Dallas, University of Mary, and a few others I'm forgetting
@@jdotozFranciscan at Steubenville
This is what happens when the Church starts doing things to try to fit in with the world instead of promoting the truth and allows snakes inside. I bet this priest isn’t the only one. Sad sad sad
If the Church does that it becomes Episcopalian...LOL...but the Church will never fall...the gates of hell will NOT prevail...but sinners in the Church will cause drama, chaos, and confusion....they will not prevail because Christ wins.
In this case snakes are literally being allowed into the Church. Lol
@Patrick Reynolds bro great advice! I too often say Christ will win, but you're right, He's already won
@Patrick Reynolds I've never heard of that. Any references/works in particular for a deeper dive?
@Patrick Reynolds Thanks!
This priest was promoted at my parish is Seattle and NW region to join a seminar on Catholic approach to racism. I was shocked at this promotion based on what he was promoting. Straight from the secular “word speak” and philosophy. Totally heretical. Thanks for bringing this subject up and this “priests” ideas. He needs to be exposed and stopped within the Catholic Church. Trent, take a look at some of these seminars available on TH-cam. Truly shocking and disturbing from a Catholic perspective.
I have been following the activity of this priest for many years online. He has written numerous articles laced with freemasonic languge and has done this for years.
@@cjgodley1776 why doesn't that surprise me
That's the Seattle archdiocese for ya. Also the reason why I left St. Michaels parish in Olympia to become byzantine Catholic
@@cjgodley1776 That's the sad part. Most likely Fr. Horan is known to some degree in the US and even in Western Europe in Catholic circles. No one does anything because most likely those in charge or see him are of the "Spirit of VII" types.
Why people like this become priests, I will never know.
Guaranteed employment and a good retirement plan.
They're weasels, looking to find a secure and "chill" employment with a reliable retirement plan
Because they want to be the next Gandhi or Mandela or something, and think they can singlehandedly save the oppressive institutional Church from its outdated bigotry (by teaching heterodoxy). And so they become priests to try and rework the system from within.
Read Taylor Marshall's book "Infiltration".
They actively want to undermine the Church
It can't be this hard for a priest to know about gnostic dualism.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he is aware. I was talking to this gay guy who used to call himself a bad Catholic, and after finally opening up to me about his sexuality he seemed to be more comfortable telling me about what he believed about everything. And he told me some wild things, mostly things to justify his homosexuality, but he unified all the ideas under Gnosticism, using that word. He never said if he got that from the priests he’d hang out with, but he kept emphasizing that most priests and nuns are gay and a lot of the anti Catholic ideas he has he got from them. He wouldn’t say that like an accusation or to blame them, he was trying to use them as an authority.
@@thatsmynametoo777 these priests and nuns were active in their homosexuality? (Either with him or without?)
I would bet good money this priest is a freemason. He has numerous articles written that are loaded with freemasonic terminology and symbolism.
@@crobeastness My understanding from our conversation is that they are active in their homosexuality. He could have been lying to me, but that wasn't the sense I got.
A second generation of Richard Rohr. Franciscan and a wolf in sheep's clothing.
This guy is absolute nuts and he's probably never seen this;
God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
Genesis 1:27
@YAJUN YUAN You're using that word in a way that it wasn't meant to be used.
I remember having Fr. Horan at my CINO college for two Masses of the Holy Spirit during my Freshman and Junior years. He seemed okay the first time but he started to get kinda woke my Junior year. I will say, though, since he started to get publicly woke on social media, he hasn't been back. I'm thinking maybe someone put a word in to the school to have them stop (Bishop maybe or a shareholder fearful of losing any kind of diocesan support). Also, I'm almost certain his particular OFM Province was heavily sponsored by ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick. Coincidence?
It's all so tiresome...
This is like a scientist having to publicly explain, over and over again why the sky is blue and not bright purple
My dog was put to sleep just a couple of days ago. He was very sick and demanded a lot, financially and emotionally, from my family. I had to make the difficult decision. I have to say, I had second thoughts on my decision. Thank you Trent for clarifying what the Church says about this issue.
I’m so sorry about your loss may you see him again 🙏🏼✝️🕊 there is no shame in admitting that he/she was like family to you and you made the best choice for that little one so they would not have to suffer as their Stewart God bless ❤️🙏🏼
Everyone here should know, in case there are people who don't.... Father Casey from the TH-cam channel "Breaking In The Habit" is a close friend of Father Dan Horan.
Father Casey shares all the same beliefs. He refuses to denounce any of them but he is very nuanced in his approach..... many faithful Catholics watch Breaking In The Habit and don't realize.
That's unfortunate. I enjoy father Casey's insight on "upon fryer review"
Thank you for the information
Not surprised.
Wait…what? No he doesn’t. No way. I watch all his videos. He’s never done a James Martin.
I think trent wanted to discuss with fr casey about the show choosen he refused I wonder why?
New Ager Fr Richard Rohr OFM is the trail blazer for such heterodox nonsense. I love the Francisn order (OFM) and dearly hope it doesn't succumbed to radical progressivism and militant social justice.
If someone wants to misgender ne because I "do it", aren't those people, according to them, engage in unchristian and sinful behaviour?
How come babies in the womb don’t get personhood when the definition of a fetus is offspring , Child I thought humans were persons. Now we are arguing to give personhood to animals before we can give it to babies in the womb. Mind you I love animals so much but I realize that animals can be a tool to help you socially in life you must also love the human.
Where are the Bishops when these heretical claims come forth? Pray for God to give us Godly Bishops.
The problem is that misgendering a Bishop wouldn't just be offensive, it'd be confusing, and would lead to people believing YOU were addled in the brain. If someone complained about Sr Mary I'd not know who they meant. If they called a Bishop "she" I'd think they were genuinely mistaken or possibly talking about some weird Episcopalian thing.
The first problem was publishing this in the Reporter.
Where are the bishops when it comes to reigning in these ideas? It is one thing to debate within an intellectual circle, it is another thing to promote it like this to an already poorly catechized population. Thank you for this video Trent!
Totally agree! Where are the Bishops. So much of this nonsense is getting put out by these “priests”. Richard Rohr is another heretic. They should be silenced or leave the priesthood. I’m tired of the lackadaisical control of these men’s (and) women using the Catholic name to promote these ideas. Step up Bishops. It’s your job.
Forget where I saw it, but the Bishop of the Diocese where NCR is based has revoked their ability to use Catholic in their title but they are in defiance of him. I agree though, bishops should do more all over the place in calling this terrible evil out.
Their Pre-Ferred Pro-Nouns are:
Me, My-Self and I,
The Un-Holy Trinity.
Donkey sanctuaries and animal sanctuaries etc etc,should not exist unwanted animals should be put to sleep, the money saved on their upkeep should be spent on mankind, we treat animals like humans and prefer them to having children.
Ok there Martin, keep having families with 8 children in first world countries whole millions died of starvation
Ok then go to the first or third world countries and stop them having 8 children per family 🤣🤣🤣😂,good luck with that, and once again thanks for the laughs
It's astounding and honestly scary how someone with these easily refutable and honestly quite dumb arguments could have been given a doctorate in systematic theology.
Shows that the teaching authority of the Catholic Church is not infallible.
@@colepriceguitar1153 Getting doctorates in systematic theology never was infallible, nor does the Church claim that it's infallible. Only very particular documents can be called infallible in Catholicism. Our dear nut-priest Trent so soundly refutes does not represent Catholic Church teaching at all. Infallible Church teaching only includes very specific documents released by the Pope about once every hundred years or so (more sometimes depending on the time period). This priest is definitely not covered by it; nor is his doctorate.
I don't know how anyone can read scripture and find it compatible with a strong animal rights view. From animal sacrifice to Jesus sending demons into pigs, animals are consistently portrayed as creatures that can be used as means to an end, which is inconsistent with personhood. There are verses that say nice things about them (his eye is on the sparrow), but they're never on the same level as humans.
Franciscan, definitely does not mean what it once did.
May God have mercy on Fr Horan's soul.
I'm a new Catholic and am stunned at this kind of stuff within Mother Church. The Bride's dress certainly seems torn and besmirched, thankfully Christ deeply loves His Bride even when she falls in the mud of modernism. Thank You Jesus.
Sanguis Christi, miserere nobis.
Deus Vult
Names I understand depending on the reason for change.
This guy is a quake he is so woke it is sad.
He needs to be disciplined. It’s so infantile. The Pope should do something however I fear it would be in the affirmative of these people….We need to pray desperately for the Church and the Pope.
Nominalism and its consequences...
Good call!
@YAJUN YUAN more a conceptualist, I was thinking of William of Ockham
The best point I took away from this is the analogy that you should not affirm a thin anorexic person's false belief that they are grossly overweight. That is not loving, that is obviously harmful.
As soon as Jurassic Park was mentioned I knew a Jeff Goldblum impersonation was imminent
I guarantee that this priest is a "James Martin"-type
My given name is Lynn and I am married to Tracey. Many people in the course of my life have mistaken our genders, and assumed that I am a wife and Tracey must be a husband when they have it backwards. I don't get upset when this mistake is made. No one has meant to hurt me or my wife so why should I find offense where none is intended?
You’re not mentally ill tho.
Good for you. Sometimes people just get upset over anything, especially if it's a trending social issue that they may relate to them to some degree.
In the UK, the name Ashley is unisex, where many boys have it as their name. In the US, Ashley is predominately seen as a girls name. Lynn and Tracey are also unisex names in the US, though not as common.
I am a non-white where my complexion is sometimes mistaken for Chinese, Mexican, or Japanese. I am neither of those. I do not get upset when strangers guess my ethnicity incorrectly.
They lie and they insist that we lie. The Church does call lying a sin.
Priests need to stop assuming that they can determine what is and is not sinful. The virtue of their office does not afford them some special privilege by which they can substitute their own ideology for the mind of God. God is eternal. He does not change for our time. We need to orient our thinking to his will.
funny, given that this is the exact thing that apologists, including Trent, do. Scratch that, it's the foundation of their actions.
@@Mish844 Have any proof of what you say? Seems to me you're rather fascinated by Horn despite disagreeing with him and other "apologists."
Let me ask you, are you a Catholic?
@@TickleMeElmo55 I am fascinated. Or at least interested, because as much as disinterested as I wish I was, this kind of christian fundamentalism is a poison that spills over USA and reaches the most antiintellectual circles even in Europe, emboldening most depraved catholics even here, in Europe.
And Trent's ideology isn't exactly hidden. His entire channel is made, to my knowledge, to further interests of christian apologetics. It's about as clear as ideology activism can get, even if limited to internet.
No, I'm not. Not anymore, I left the church around a decade ago. My occasional presence here is out curiosity.
this is the spirit of Vatican II....it's not Vatican II but IT IS the spirit of Vatican II...thanks Paul VI and John-Paul II for allowing the early stages of the modernist madness which has led to this
God bless you Trent for all you do
Very good insight. The layman has very deep insight on reality, but the priest of God, who is supposed to be a spiritual and moral guide is living under the diabolical disorientation of the devil. Let’s pray for the shepherds to see clearly. There is too much darkness.
Fr Daniel “James Martin Jr” Horan 🙄
If persons are entitled to have sex, then both human an non human persons are allowed to have sex. Together. It is only a short distance from sodomy to sodomy.
National Schismatic Reporter
Oh, Franciscans.. where has your mission gone? So many priests focus on this nonsense while there are so many who are struggling with something real. Arguing about this kind of garbage discredits the Church
NCReporter was once a reputable newspaper. And the Franciscans aren't typically this heterodox but they always have had outliers.
Uncertain how Lawrence of Brindisi, Bonaventure, Padre Pio, and Francis of Assisi would say if they were in his monastery.
The balderdash makes the Jesuit order look sane and, contrary to accurate stereotypes, a lot of SJ is on good footing with orthodoxy; it's not necessarily back to the roots of the order, before and during suppression, but we'll take it in stride. One day the heterodox of that order will not have power or platform; it probably won't happen in my lifetime but here's to orthodoxy.
For me, animals have temperament, not "personality."
Helpful if you say what kind of Franciscan friar- OFM (Friar Minor) . Also, thank you for clarifying St. Francis’ relationship with animals.
Lol @ "Bran", it's a very old name, found in Old Welsh and Irish myths and histories.
You're spot on about the golden rule: any Christian should want to be reconciled to the Lord, so must want the truth in all things.
Well addressed overall.
Gives new meaning to Bran Flakes. ; )
Woa-oh Black Betty
0:16
Have our religious walked off into the land of crazy.
Thank you Mr. Horn. They'll let anyone become a Franciscan these days.
Fe Daniel Horan is one of those pretentious Franciscans that scarcely wears the habit because “it’s not what St Francis would’ve done if he was in our time”
He also fiercely criticised the Church teaching on sexuality when the Vatican wrote against blessing of gay unions
For. Horan’s opinion is NOT Catholic!!!!!
I started watching that priest when he first started posting on YT but VERY quickly backed out…
This is not orthodox. Genesis says God has given us dominion over the plants and the animals of the earth
I can't believe that these colleges refer to themselves as Catholic and priests like Fr. Dan Horan and Fr. James Martin. They are definitely not aligned with Roman Catholic catechism. So sad! Our Lady pray for us! Sacred Heart of Jesus have Mercy on us! 🙏🏼
It would probably be better to say true Catholicism vs false Catholicism. Faithful Catholicism vs unfaithful Catholicism. Liberal Catholicism is just not Catholicism at all.
“We shouldn’t try to make people happy
Because that’s the happy march to hell”
👌👌👌
Trent....people are made in the Image and likeness of God. Animals are NOT... That Priest sound a little off. Goodgrief....
As a Franciscan, is it possible to request that Fr. Horan adopts a consistent ideological framework for identifying himself as a specific kind of Franciscan to avoid inadvertently associating the rest of us with his views?
02:07 "A less romantic way to put it would be: We are nuclear waste" - lol
fr. dan horan gave a talk at my university about climate change and racism, and it was an utterly depressing experience. he is a decent person, but so wrong about our faith and is truly a disgrace that others think he represents our faith
So how can he be a decent person , while abusing his office and title for his own agenda ? how many souls has this "decent person " led astray by his deliberate incompetence ?.
he just seems like a kind and genuine person, but obviously leading others a stray is horrible. i'm not trying to defend what he says, but he is just a person that has yet to encounter the full truth of Christ
He's an academic friar so it comes to no surprise he has survived this long.
"Let's stick to saint and apostle names" says Trenton.
We'll have to fast-track you to make that possible for future Trents. ;)
A miscalled a bishop multiple times. I called him Father X. instead of Bishop X. and he didn't seem to mind. So, done that but it had no effect.
Acts 21 And it came to pass that after we had parted from them and had launched, we came on a straight course unto Coos, and the day following unto Rhodes, and from thence unto Patara.
2 And finding a ship sailing over unto Phoenicia, we went aboard and set forth.
3 Now when we had sighted Cyprus, we left it on the left hand, and sailed to Syria and landed at Tyre, for there the ship was to unload her burden.
4 And having found disciples, we tarried there seven days. They told Paul through the Spirit that he should not go up to Jerusalem.
5 And when those days there had been accomplished, we departed and went our way; and they all brought us on our way, with wives and children, until we were out of the city. And we kneeled down on the shore and prayed.
6 And when we had taken our leave one of another, we boarded ship, and they returned home again.
7 And when we had finished our course from Tyre, we came to Ptolemais and saluted the brethren, and stayed with them one day.
8 The next day, we who were in Paul’s company departed and came unto Caesarea, and we entered into the house of Philip the evangelist, who was one of the seven, and lodged with him.
9 And this man had four daughters, virgins, who prophesied.
10 And as we tarried there many days, there came down from Judea a certain prophet named Agabus.
11 And when he had come unto us, he took Paul’s girdle and bound his own hands and feet, and said, “Thus saith the Holy Ghost, ‘So shall the Jews at Jerusalem bind the man who owneth this girdle, and shall deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles.’”
12 And when we heard these things, both we and those at that place besought him not to go up to Jerusalem.
13 Then Paul answered, “What mean ye to weep and to break mine heart? For I am not only ready to be bound, but also to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus.”
14 And when he would not be dissuaded, we ceased, saying, “The will of the Lord be done.”
15 And after those days we took up our baggage and went up to Jerusalem.
16 There went with us also certain of the disciples of Caesarea, who brought with them one Mnason of Cyprus, an old disciple, with whom we were to lodge.
17 And when we had come to Jerusalem, the brethren received us gladly.
18 And the day following, Paul went with us unto James, and all the elders were present.
19 And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles by his ministry.
20 And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord and said unto him, “Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are who believe, and they are all zealous for the law.
21 And they are informed about thee, that thou teachest all the Jews who are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, nor walk according to the customs.
22 What is therefore to be done? The multitude must surely come together, for they will hear that thou art come.
23 Do therefore this which we say to thee: We have four men who have taken a vow upon themselves.
24 Take them and purify thyself with them, and bear their charges with them, that they may shave their heads; and all may know that those things of which they have been informed concerning thee are nothing, butthat thou thyself also walkest orderly and keepest the law.
25 And as to the Gentiles who believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication.”
26 Then Paul took the men, and the next day, purifying himself with them, he entered into the temple to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until an offering should be offered for every one of them.
27 And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews who were from Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people and laid hands on him,
28 crying out, “Men of Israel, help! This is the man who teacheth all men everywhere against the people and the law and this place, and furthermore brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place.”
29 (For they had seen previously with him in the city Trophimus an Ephesian, whom they supposed that Paul had brought into the temple.)
30 And all the city was moved and the people ran together, and they took Paul and dragged him out of the temple; and forthwith the doors were shut.
31 And as they went about to kill him, tidings came unto the chief captain of the garrison that all Jerusalem was in an uproar,
32 who immediately took soldiers and centurions and ran down unto them; and when they saw the chief captain and the soldiers, they left off beating Paul.
33 Then the chief captain came near, and took him and commanded that he be bound with two chains, and demanded who he was and what he had done.
34 And some cried one thing, some another, among the multitude. And when he could learn nothing with certainty because of the tumult, he commanded him to be carried into the castle.
35 And when Paul came upon the stairs, so it was that he had to be borne by the soldiers because of the violence of the people.
36 For the multitude of the people followed after, crying, “Away with him!”
37 And as Paul was about to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, “May I speak unto thee?” And he said, “Canst thou speak Greek?
38 Art not thou that Egyptian who prior to these days madest an uproar and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men who were murderers?”
39 But Paul said, “I am a man who am a Jew of Tarsus, a city of Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city; and I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people.”
40 And when he had given him leave, Paul stood on the stairs and beckoned with his hand unto the people. And when there fell a great silence, he spoke unto them in the Hebrew tongue, saying:
Elizabeth Johnson must be 80 by now. She is one of the original nuns on a bus feminists. What's sad is that modern theologians take her seriously.
Just like Fr. Casey, won't dialogue with you. Who would of saw that coming.
Dude, you need to interview somebody like Gunter Bechly. Your acceptance of Darwinian Theory and that we are also stardust (as Sagan declared) is a mistake.
You seemed thrilled to talk about this. 😂 The National Catholic Distorter along with America Magazine are bastions of heterodoxy.
I want my first sons name to be Damien Leslie [lastname] Its' a cool name from a cool saint, and Leslie is my holy Grandpa's name
So if Fido finds himself in the communion line, I wonder what this Priest would do.
All theologians need to return to tradition. If they are not happy with the traditional teachings of the church get out, and stop trying to change it to your liking.
fr. dan is uncompromisingly problematic.
Will the real Francis of Assisi please stand UP! 😂 So good!
NCR needs Catholic removed from its name
Two bishops asked them to- Bishop Charles Helmsing in 1968 and Bishop Finn in 2013.
Yep, I’m a former teacher and I’ve seen more than one student named Abcde. 😒
Is there a link to the study showing that depression among LGBT people has increased over the past few years including in countries that are very accepting of them?
Look them up. "Trans" are at the top of the list but all sexually confused people suffer from low self esteem and depression.
11:33 "The Counsel of Trenton" doesn't have the same pzzazz as the name of a TH-cam channel.
Bran while possibly not common is an old celtic name. The old mythical king of origin was Bran the Blessed
Yup, Bran means "raven." Besides Bran the Blessed, there are a ton of other older Welsh given names that use the "Bran" particle.
Thank you very much Trent, for the work you do to teach and defend the truth of Catholic faith! God bless you and your family always!
Eastern mysticism has invaded the thinking of the Catholic Church since Thomas Merton and pope Francis has promoted his views and opinions on eastern mysticism in the Catholic faith
How?
@@l21n18
Really!!!! Your answer is how 😂😂😂🤣👍thanks for the laughs.
What is wrong specifically?
@@asdfasdf3989
Jesus is the way the truth and the life and nobody can go to heaven except through Jesus, eastern mysticism has nothing to do with Jesus and therefore eastern mysticism is demonic in nature.
There is no salvation outside of the catholic and apostolic church.
@@martinmartin1363 What specific teachings that came from Thomas Merton are contradicting this?
The crazy thing about this is how quickly it creeped up on us, consider, the sitcom Scrubs from the 00's was without any doubt a sitcom with a generally left wing point of view, and a running joke on that show was Doctor Cox calling JD, John Dorian, by girl's names, in every episode, he calls him by a different female name, it was a hilarious bit, but today it would be called 'misgendering' and condemned as hate speech
If you think that’d be totally un-PC, try many of the old sitcoms & cartoons of the past…All in the Family comes to mind…&…I still love the old shows.
Throw in Last Man Standing…
@@kainosktisis777there is certainly a lot that the modern woke left finds offensive but my point is how quickly the standard changed. Another example of a left leaning show that is now "offensive" is Friends
@@Michael-bk5nz
Seriously..? 😳
Friends is offensive now…? 😳
I’m starting to think I’ve lived too long…
@@kainosktisis777 Creator Martha Kauffman has recently been going in an "apology tour" apologizing for the alleged 'racism and transphobia" in the show. It is "racist" because all of the main 6 characters are white, even though they were clearly cast not due to their race but for their chemistry and how well they played off each other. The "transphobia" refers to the jokes about Chandler's dad being a gay transvestite, and the "misgendering" of him as male, even though the show never at any point implied that he was transgender, he was just a transvestite
@@Michael-bk5nz
😳
“The world with its feet planted firmly in midair…”
On the topic of names, I'm thinking of naming one of my future daughters "Bllanca," but only if I am successful in my move to Chile where it'll be pronounced right; I'm naming this possible future daughter thus, because it would be closer to the meaning of the name Bianca which is "white," "blanca" in Spanish.
Throw this guy in a boxing ring, he needs some post modernist emancipation to the face 🤦♂️😂
Effeminacy is a scourge within modernism. It is everywhere!
Even Coming from a disciple of Saint Francis, this is way too much about animals! LOL
The real St. Francis of Assisi was a true follower of the Lord with a sense of conviction and righteousness. The man was nothing short of a badass. He tried building a church by himself, brick by brick. He gave a sermon to the birds when no one else would listen. He went right into Muslim territory to try converting the Sultan.
Sadly, he’s been co-opted by hippies. Loving God’s creation and finding beauty in it is quite different from worshipping it.
Fr Dan looks like the kind of guy that would explode at you if you disagree with him mid-sentence. Something about him....
He's a child. Fisher Price heresy. It's adorable in a way.
All heresy starts with something true.
How is it possible that he is still a priest?
Peter Singer's favorite priest!
This was a good episode, but I just listened to the "Free For All Fridays" one with your two boys. Hilarious. Enjoy them while they're still so young. :)
Wonder would happen if I identified as emperor. It could hurt my feelings very much if someone denied my proper title «cesar». I could perhaps also consider being the «all-wise» or «all-knowing» just for fun. If someone gave into it, they could not deny me my right to deny others their right😀 - after all I would emperor and all-knowing
This priest - Fr. Horan - has repeatedly written articles laced with freemasonic symbolism and language.
It would not surpise me in the least if he was a freemason seeking to undermine the church from within.
Any examples? I would like to know.
@@ferdinand4026 Will try and find some. They were on Huff Post. Hopefully, they haven't been archived.
You're making perfect sense to me Trent.
@ 12:05 - 12:11
Well, if they will use the Golden Rule, then we should use the GODLY Rule:
1st, YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL OF YOUR MIND, HEART, SOUL, AND SPIRIT, STRENGTH OR MIGHT!
2nd, YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR(S) AS YOURSELF!
Take Note, based from the two commandments, YOURSELF is the final word, meaning, IT must come Last as GOD must come First...
@ 11:57 - 12:03
Why is there so much resistance and pushback among some in the LGBTQ+ community - including in personal level - to using the gender duties or gender affirming roles referred by the Son of Man, especially by Him who is the Father of the Son of Man?
Why are same-sex couples so resistant?
Why do they not support God by referred roles and duties?
So much common sense from Trent again.
Re names: I won't yield on pronouns but I will on names. A name is somewhat more arbitrary and need not even necessarily be gendered; there are enough gender-neutral names out there like "Leslie" or "Evelyn" that I can generally go along.
Take, for example, the fictional "boy named Sue." Sue's father had the authority to name him, so that became his actual name. As an adult, Sue obtained the authority to rename himself. At that point, he could remain Sue or become Larry or even something strange like Jeep or Espn. But we would usually recognize the choice either way.