Is Radeon Super Resolution (RSR) Worth Using?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 มิ.ย. 2024
- AMD announced Radeon Super Resolution (RSR) back at CES, and it has finally arrived in the latest driver. It uses the same upscaling algorithm as FSR but it is applied at the driver level, meaning it can work in any game you want, without specific integration. We put it to the test, comparing it against FSR, NIS and DLSS... Read more here: bit.ly/3wmwVFE
Subscribe to our channel here: bit.ly/3B5CAAs
Be sure to check out our sponsor's store EKWB here: ek.tech/kit-guru
00:00 Start
00:39 Introduction and test setup
03:57 Horizon Zero Dawn Image Comparisons
11:52 Guardians of the Galaxy Image Comparisons
18:04 F1 2021 Image Comparisons
21:46 Performance Benchmarks
23:02 Closing Thoughts
GPU test system powered by MSI. See it here: msi.gm/KitguruMSItestbench
Check out this system on CCL here: msi.gm/KitguruPCPoweredbyMSI
CPU: Intel Core i9-12900K
Motherboard: MSI MEG Z690 Unify
Memory: 32GB ADATA XPG Lancer DDR5 6000MHz CL40
CPU Cooler: MSI CoreLiquid S360
SSD: 2TB MSI Spatium M.2 SSD
Power Supply: Corsair HX1200
Case: MSI MPG Velox 100P Airflow
Monitor: MSI Optix MPG321UR-QD
Check out KITGURU MERCH over here: teespring.com/en-GB/stores/ki....
Discord invite link: / discord
Steam Community steamcommunity.com/groups/kit...
Be sure to support us on PATREON / kitgurutech and read our MANTRA on HONEST REVIEWS Here: bit.ly/2BopnF9
KitGuru uses a variety of equipment to produce content:
As of May 2020:
Panasonic GH5 and GH5s Cameras
Panasonic GH4 Cameras
Panasonic G7 Cameras
DJI OSMO Pocket Cameras
Canon Cameras
Various PC builds
Final output - colour grading/titling etc:
iMac Pro 18 Core/Vega 64/128GB
iMac 2019 9900k Vega 48/64/1TB
Adobe Premiere Pro CC (PC)
Davinci Resolve Studio 14/15 (Mac)
iPad Pro 12.9 inch (2018) machines with LumaFusion
Final Cut Pro (Mac)
Visit our facebook page over here! / kitguru.net
Visit our Twitter page over here! kitgurupress?lang=en
#RSR #AMD #SuperResolution - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Will you be enabling RSR - or are you not that impressed with the image quality? let us know your thoughts...
so everyone buying a new 5000 IGPU'S with VEGA graphics will not get RSR so why buy from AMD WAIT FOR MORE RDNA IGPU'S LOOKS LIKE amd ENDING SUPPORT FOR VEGA
Not really that often, but it does come in handy for some games in 4k. Although I really prefer the full resolution, even if that means losing some frames. I have to say the last driver was really good and cyberpunk with RT and fidelty high would run at 68 fps average. I agree, that it would be nice to have on older cards. I bet they will add it to older cards later, just like they added some features to older CPUs. But you are right about the zooming in, in reality you do not notice the small diferences and if it gives a boost, fantastic.
Dumb question. It's free performance and works with every game what do you think?
Rsr on control with ray tracing maxed out is amazing
I tested it on my heavily modded fallout 4, with all the mod textures, I still able to maintaining 4k 144fps in downtown Boston. I do have an RX 6900xt.
RSR just turned my 6800 XT into a 7000 series GPU. I'm now gaming at 4k high refresh for pretty much every game. AMD gets a thumbs up in my book.
What about image quality is it good?
how do i get and use rsr? does it work in vr?
Did you notice any difference between image quality??
@@bruhmoment3169 upscaling from 1440p or 1800p I can’t tell the difference between the upscale and native 4K
@@bikramjeet7385 if I upscaled from 1440p or 1800p I noticed no difference. If I upscaled from 1080p things started to get blurry.
RSR can be enabled on a per game basis from the driver which is cool too for games not supporting FSR. Every few months they've done something in software or hardware like SAM, FSR, RSR to improve performance on my 5700 xt. Long may it continue whilst prices rise for everything.
well some sort of FSR can too at least on steam games on linux or via 3rd party software on windows, hopefully rsr is better tho
why people using 5700xt for games only still haven't sold it and gotten something else like 6700xt for same price bothers me though lol. Too late soon if not already
@@user-wq9mw2xz3j Gee, I wonder. Maybe it had to do with availability around the world and pricing being fucked for 2 years?
@@johnbuscher thats the whole reason for why one should sell 5700xt, at least previously, they sold for $700-1000 and you could easily get a 6700xt and even still save cash.
Now mining is less profitable, but could still probably sell it for $650-700 and get a 3060ti for a bit less.
@@user-wq9mw2xz3j IMO at this point, it's probably better to wait until the rx 7000 series comes out which isnt too far out. Entry and mid level cards are theoretically supposed to perform better than the 6900xt and hopefully gpu prices will be at MSRP price by then.
Features AMD introduced since RDNA1 was introduced in July 2019 (~3 years ago):
- Radeon Image Sharpening - DX9 - DX10 - DX11
- Anti-Lag - DX9 - DX10 - DX11
- Radeon Boost - DX11
- FSR 1.0
- SAM (Resizable Bar)
- AMD Smartshift (for laptops)
- minimal driver installation
- driver Auto Overclock / Auto Underclock / Auto VRAM Overclock (also known as "RAGE" mode for the RDNA2 launch - this feature is garbage IMO)
- Ryzen CPU overclock/underclock in drivers, instead of relying on Ryzen Master (way, way too iffy though, so meh)
What AMD further polished in the meantime:
- Radeon Image Sharpening - enabled for DX12 - Vulkan
- Anti-Lag - enabled for DX12 (not sure about Vulkan?)
- Radeon Boost - enabled for DX12 and on RDNA2 (DX12U capable), it now uses Variable Rate Shading instead of Dynamic Resolution
- SAM support on RDNA1
- RSR (driver FSR 1.0 injection)
- FSR 2.0
- Radeon Chill was tunned a bit, I think?
- Removed and re-added (?): FRTC - framerate target control - kinda some thing as Chill, but only as a frame cap and not trying to dynamically control GPU clocks/TDP like Chill does
That's a great list of features IMO.
True and speaking of Radeon Boost, I was hoping by now that it would allow us to set it where it goes off frame rate and not motion, basically for now, it goes of mouse movement in lowering the resolution which I would think it makes more sense to go on frame rates so say you dip a little under 60fps, it drops the resolution to bump the frame rate up and son on.
That would make that a lot more useful compared to going on controller input because that will lower the resolution regardless of hardware power you have, in other words, you're getting a worse image a lot of the times when it's not needed.
and still their 6600XT restarts my PC with display going to sleep :D like what the hell, I am not only one and not everyone can dig in ther regedit settings to make this work like it should
anti lag is actually making you more lag LMAO
no machine learning :(
@@crispinotechgaming That's a good thing is it delivers good results.
RSR looks more crisp and vibrant to me... wonder what it will look like at 1440p using 1080p
For me it looks good as long as TAA is on.
Been testing this like crazy since yesterday afternoon and it seems to actually do what it claims to do! with a 6800XT on a 3900X I was able to render Cyberpunk at 1440p and RSR upscale it to 4K. With a bit of juggling settings around, dropping a few of the ultra down to high (the ones that show no real difference between the two) I was able to manage a capped 60fps with all of the raytracing turned on. This came in at around 70% GPU load, 55°C. That's quite impressive for RDNA2, which up until the recent 1.5 patch has run Cyberpunk like an absolute pig. I'm well happy with that.
There IS an annoying downside to using RSR though, it often buggers up all of your window placements, like Steam, GOG etc. Still trying to figure that one out.
Doesn't cyberpunk have fsr anyways?
@@inforced At the time of my comment it didn't, no. FSR 1.0 (the shit version) was introduced with patch 1.5 which was still pretty bad. FSR 2.0 improved a lot but unfortunately the 6800XT still wasn't good enough for 4K.
@@Duvoncho ok thanks! But now its better to use fsr in cyberpunk (for cleaner hud and less buggy interface with overlays as you said) right?
@@inforced Oh for sure! FSR 2.0 compared to 1.0 is miles better. FSR 2.0 performs just as well as DLSS for Cyberpunk (and many other games), except for the Raytracing performance. AMD cards still do worse but that's a hardware issue with the RT cores being worse on AMD. That will always be the case for those generation GPUs, no upscaling tech can change that. 👍
Most of the improvement seen with dlss in HZD is from it replacing the game's aa with it's own implementation, using a better aa option with rsr gets a better result on bushes than fsr does because fsr in HZD is locked to the game's taa option which causes most of that shimmering
i think fsr 2.0 has to fix that
HZD now has FSR in it and I think it disabled the counter productive sharpening pass, when I tried the FSR slider. It was a good reminder about the issue.
Too sad we rx570 users are not part of the plan 😭
Bro !!! We totally left out...Im gutted..
@@naikz187war4i feel you pain but rx 570 is a 2016 gpu, is time to move, i have one but iam already thinking on a 6600xt to replace, but anyway 570 have fsr ❤️
Waiting for RSR to work on my Rx 470 ;)
I still haven't seen any videos or articles that have noted that you can turn on FSR AND RSR in games that support FSR. This means you can boost your frame rate even further then just using only one of these technologies. Its kind of like Turbo Charging your Super Charger on an engine. You are Boosting your Boost.
Just already tried it in Guardians of the Galaxy. You can have RSR turned on like me using 1980x1080p -> 2560x1440p and also you can turn FSR on/off. But anything turned to less than ultra quality FSR begins looking weird with RSR working too.
Just imagine this...in Italy regular broadcast in tv is 1080p for most of the channels and most of us have a 4k tv, or Netflix with the 2 screens option.
Now imagine fsr 2.0 is out and running good, you can have 1440p image fsr set to quality so it's 1080p internally, then use rsr to play on your 4k tv. This should be amazing!
I already do this but worse with lossless scaling app and play genshin impact 720p lowest setting internally upscaled to 4k. Of course you can notice all the bad artifacts and stuff but at least I can play half decently with a Radeon graphics Apu
@@usafan96soren20 I used monitor display scaling exactly like that, the problem is you have to go into the deepest menu to avoid the GPU driver upscaling despite setting it to off (MS protecting laptop owners where displays lack upscalers).
@@RobBCactive dang it, sometimes I think way too simple bahahahahhahahhaha thank you so much for trying and letting me know
@@usafan96soren20 well I did wonder why you don't feed the FSR2/RSR 1440p output direct to the TV.
Don't they have decent built in upscaling?
Gigabyte OC'd RX5700XT rev 2 owner here, using RSR alone I just seen my same average FPS @1080 low-medium settings become the average @4k in the games I've tested. The testing done in this video does not give a true comparison based on user experience. I can even play the online competitive games I play in 4k without having to dial things down to maximize FPS.
I've always found upscale tech is best suited for FPS and really fast paced games. Higher frame rate for games that actually need it is a pretty good tradeoff for slightly lower render quality
It's so sad that AMD didn't give this feature to old cards. Hopefully GPU prices goes down soon.
100% - the older cards are the ones that need it most. Prices are dropping at least - but still above where they should be
@@KitGuruTech They more than likely just wanted to get the tech out the door ASAP and will follow up with support for the older cards.
@@KitGuruTech you say that but if u happen to have a 5500xt, 5600xt, or 6500xt this will be welcomed also i do believe amd will be bringing rsr to the older cards
gpu prices already have and are dropping. Mostly on 2nd hand market, but also Asus'es nvidia cards.
i think its also same with NVIDIA DLSS only for RTX 2000 and 3000 series GPU. but there is still hope maybe in future update they include few older models or wait for FSR 2.0
So should i set the resolution to 1440p if am trying tk get a 4k image? Or it needs to be set natively at 4k
Some tips. If you think going from 1920x1080 to 1600x900(20 extra fps) is too much. You can also do a custom resolution 1664x936(15 extra fps) which give you better look !
I don't quite understand the purpose of it. Like, i got a rx 5600xt, i play at 1080p since i dont have a better monitor/tv.
Always going for the highest setting but also trying to maintain 60 if possible
So, what super resolución do exactly? (I never use FSR).
Sorry for the long question (not bashing RSR btw)
@@ChoperJoJo I also don't know the point of RSR, it's asking the gpu to render more than your monitor capable of. But for me, if lets say you wanna record your gaming replay, you can use RSR to enhance the video so you can have like 4k replay resolution. While FSR, is used for downscale the resolution for the gpu to render then upscale back to the monitor which gives us more fps.
@@Boyardee_my I think you've been mistaken with RSR vs VSR feature...
RSR is for gaining FPS by using lower res.. being upscaled to your native monitor res...
While, VSR is for getting better graphics per pixel (more depth pixel), by sending more pixel to your monitor....
This may be a stupid comment as I may be missing something, but how would you calculate the 77% render scaling for a 1920x1080 monitor, for example? If I do it simply by math for each of the width and height, I get 1478.4x831.6. Do I then choose something close to that in the game, or is there an easier way to do this? Thanks for this video!
Just set game resolution to 720p
this makes me glad i upgraded to a rx 6500 xt RSR will add more life to this $270 budget gpu.
you can RSR at 900p and get higher quality graphics and fps.
Finally hitting a steady 165 fps with ultra settings on my 1440p monitor. Using 6700xt. Rsr is a must for frames
you overpayed imo.
Should have looked at cards 2nd hand, sometimes 1 month old cards are selling for much cheaper, warranty included.
@@josechav5731 165 fps? Are you sure that you can even tell the difference without looking at the frame counter?
Most really demanding games are slow paced and it is even mote impossible to see any difference, unless you specifically pay 100% focus and move screen as fast as possible just to try to see some difference.
Heck, even in fast paced FPS games I barely see any difference above 100-120 fps. On others I don't even care to get over 70, understandably not everybody has the same limits but some are way too fixated an high refresh rate (or top quality settings for that matter).
@@user-wq9mw2xz3j $270 for a bufget gpu that can play all the game in 1080 medium/hugh settings 60 fps or over priced 6 year old gpus?...lol.
ill take the new tech.
@@josechav5731 i dont need ultra settings and 100fps to enjoy gaming...lol.
On linux with gamescope, I think 900p -> 1080p is also a nice enough option, like the real utra quality should be. It's a lot harder to differentiate from native even for UI elements.
I was pretty excited when I saw the news for this, then I realize my 570 wasn't supported I fail to understand why since FSR works on Polaris and the 400/500 series would've benefit greatly from this. Pretty sad tbh.
I see a lot of this comment everywhere and the thing that I can point to is that FSR is baked into software but RSR is a driver level implementation which means that the actual platform ie Rdna is mandatory just like dlss is for rtx cards because it needs a specific decoding algorithm in the architecture of the gpu
@@elysian3623 yet it works in the Linux RDVR driver
I suspect the reason is this feature might sell new cards, secondly
tech ppl think about 4K with good upscaling quality.
720p -> 1080p looks worse, 1080p is supposed to be easy. They likely didn't see the support as a priority.
There's the driver modding group that made the RDNA2 only noise suppression usable on old cards.
So it may come from them even if AMD don't release it.
This comparison/demo is exactly what I was looking for. Great video!
FSR and RSR and AMD drivers are open source so we'll have it in Proton GE and it will run on older cards that is the way of our drivers and the kernal that has AMD tech baked in. I had been using FSR 1 on Vega 8 for years now. This limitation is on Windows, Open drivers mean it not the case for us. Epic's and Nvidia API's both need to be on Windows or over Priced Nvidia Hardware. RSR might need a higher GPU overhead. When they open the code to public we will find out why it only of newer hardware. Because I would love to use it on my Vega to get better FPS even at 1080p.
when is it oput? does it work in vr? i have a 6800xt btw
Im confused about all this ??? So i just go from 2560x1440 to 1920x1080 and then i enable Super Resolution ? And its suppose to look like its a 2560x1440 ? But i get the fps boost from going down to 1920x1080 ? Is that what this is suppose to do ? I have a 6900xt.. i tried this on Total war warhammer 3, and i get 40fps more.. the game looks the same to me the amd notification says 1080 to 1440.. But i will say the icons and menus in the game do get larger,, aka being at 1080p versus 1440.... So what is the honest point for this ? Everything still gets bigger from dropping the resolution ? Is this just suppose to make them look "sharper" like it would be at 1440 ??
If Im already not on native in a game does rsr give me more frames or does it only increase image sharpness?
I tried enabling RSR, but for me its not working when I open fortnite and change the resolution absolutely nothing changes in the Radeon software do you have any idea why it wouldn't work?
Did you make sure its fullscreen?
Yeah make sure it’s exclusive fullscreen. Borderless window doesn’t work
U sure have a rx5000+ card lol. and full screen
I have a Radeon RX 6700S card. Why don't I see the RSR option in my driver settings? Are mobile cards not supported?
I must be totally missing something here! If I play on a high fps 1080p monitor why would I want to dumb down my resolution in game just to have my GPU bring it back up? Seems like it would only be useful for 4k gaming?
Will other sharpening filters in ReShade be useful?
Honestly I'm just more concerned about how much FPS you get back. In real time motion. You might not notice the visual difference but 20 to 40 more FPS is definitely noticeable.
Cod mw all ultra i get native 1440p 220-230 avg. At 1080p rsr to 1440p same settings i get more around 300. Its insane and cant really tell the difference. Love this feature. Uploaded some vids to people to check the difference ✌️😃
Great video comparison. Keep up these comparisons.
Does RSR work with multi monitor setup / eyefinity?
I am more interested in rendering it a native res and then scaling it above monitor res, is that possible?
There's good reasons why AMD prioritised RDNA2, they want to sell cards and Nvidia have an edge in 4K with both raw performance and DLSS mindshare.
Building on FSR for the 4K market is logical.
Secondly many experts have said upscaling works better above 1080p and wrongly disregarded the low end where playability can be an issue.
Driver development costs money so supporting all cards would divert resources.
I mean FSR does a pretty good job on my kids rx590 so I'm pretty happy with that increase. So its not like that didn't have any improvements for older cards as of late.
RSR activer I don't quite understand how it works ?
I think I was wrong sometimes when I activate the RSR on my screen 4k means that when I'm in 2k it's like 4k ?? I tested gta 5 redux with RSR in 1440p and I have no performance difference lol with the original
In game FSR implementations will always be at the engine level (negative LOD bias levels to "sharpen textures for example, with selective high resolution edge creation), while RSR is at the driver level (maybe it creates a high res edge?...not sure). It honestly does an OUTSTANDING job(minus issues with TAA and shimmering). Far better in a lot of games than me using regular 1440p upscaling with RIS. And it also uses RIS at one point so i dont have to enable both of them (it actually wont let you anyways) and tinker to get the sharpness right (its all ready done!). This is definitely something that will only improve their customer base. I also dont get why they didnt release this for older GFX cards.
Driver level is a bad thing in this case. The main trick about FSR looking pretty decent is that while the game will be rendered at the downscales resolution, the post processing will be done at native resolution. Post processing is what adds more blur to videogames nowadays, things like TAA, chromatic aberration and so so on. Adding it at driver level means everything will be upscaled.
Is it compatible with rx6800m because I have downloaded update with no RSR toggle?
With RSR i can play now elden ring at 1440p upscaled to 4k at 60 fps with my rx 5600 xt. Im very happy
I am having an issue where it is upscaling to the wrong resolution
I use this to scale from 1800p to 4k in games that don't have fsr. It's not bad for that small of a jump
I updated my Driver for my 5700XT Red Devil. I see the RSR, I enable it before launching the game. The monitor is a native 1440P launch game and set the Resolution to 1080P. I look at my Adrenalin Software and I don't see it working. I try a different game and still nothing. Also, my HotKey to Open AMD Adrenalin Software Alt+R or the sidebar Alt+Z isn't working, and yes it's Enabled in the options in the driver. Old driver the Hotkey worked. 22.2.2. This new one isn't working
What program are you using to compare image quality with the slider
Nvidia ICAT
@@KitGuruTech thanks
At 20:45 ghosting can be seen on the car's antenna with DLSS
So if I play a game that does support fsr, should I turn fsr ultra quality on, or should I use rsr and set in game resolution to 1440p to upscale for my 4k monitor?
My recommendation is using in-game fsr and driver RIS
what resolution is 77% (from 1080p)?
The only thing I would notice while actually playing instead of zooming in on still images is the shimmering. The shimmering is the only thing of concern everything else I have seen is fine. What technical reason could there possibly be for AMD not rolling this out to all graphics cards from AMD that supported within the Adrenaline driver pack?
Try reducing Sharpness. This takes care of the shimmering for the most part. I found that 33% sharpness is just about perfect for me.
@@zerotactix5739 Cool
Idk why my rx5600m laptop doesn't show up rsr feature in my 22.3.1 update. That's a shame 😐
I've been playing around with it, and while it's definitely janky to start - I'm not a fan of using a gimmick to enable it - it certainly is giving great results. I'm using a RX 6800 and am getting between a 20%-30% uplift in FPS with very little noticeable hit to quality. I am getting occasional stuttering, but a little glitchiness is to be expected. Overall, a very welcome addition.
-1
Actually those black lines can be solved with reducing the image sharpening on RSR slider
something wrong with my rsr. its blury or something like that. every game. its like a strong film grain or cartoon effect. any idea? i have an rx 6600
U using fsr 1 or fsr 2.0 i wish in next video u compare between fsr 1 and 2
Image quality is fine, but it messes up cursor speed in borderless fullscreen mode. I use 4k resolution with 200% scaling, but when I try to use 50% rendering, it actually changes the desktop setting to 1080p with 200% scaling.Thus, it doubles the mouse speed. To fix it, you have to manually set it to 1080p and 100% scaling every time you play. When you exit the game, it will revert to 4k resolution with 100% scaling.
thanks for this video, the comparison was quite good and detailed
Rsr seems to work better from 1440p to 1800p . For me . To hit 4k target 60fps , 1080 looks to blurry on my 4k tv.
Do you use mackup?
wonder if rsr will get fsr 2.0?
It won’t because RSR is spatial upscaling vs FSR 2.0 is temporal upscaling.
Finally, someone that did it in a normal way to how gamers play games, I mean, it's all well and good zooming in 300%, 400% on an image to find flaws whiles pausing the image but that's just not how we game.
What matters is how does the final image look in a way that you play the game and I have to say even thought this is a 1080p resolution using RSR, the image actually looks quite good considering the limited data it's working with, even the hud elements and text looks more or less fine to me that I suspect to most gamers it's fine.
Sometimes tech sites can overanalyze these things and forget what actually matters to gamers.
It will be interesting to see what FSR 2.0 brings to the table soon and if that will offer driver level support.
I felt as this was about quality differences upscaling to 4K would be a better test.
In the first video he ignored FSR at lower resolutions despite it being a boon to many.
In my experience I preferred the monitor display upscaling from 720p/1080p to 1440p slightly to FSR which also relieved the GPU of the task.
I don't see upscale status. How can it be fixed? my video card is rx 5600 xt
press alt+z for overlay and u see in game
Great work it's interesting learning about this tech. 👍
To me this feature is just awesome for a handheld like the Legion Go which has a VERY high resolution screen (1600p) running on an iGPU (780M). I can run Monster Hunter Stories in native 1440p (letterboxed) at around 50FPS while I can run it in 1080p with RSR at 70-80FPS. And since the screen doesn't have VRR (to me the one MAJOR drawback of the device. Otherwise I would never consider a competitor like the ROG Ally and let's be honest I still did get the Legion Go) being able to get it to 60 is necessary in order to avoid tearing. I don't know if it is supported by the iGPU in the Steam Deck. But it definitely works in the 780M found in the Z1 Extreme.
Does it work in vr?
An in game sharpening feature is a must even for DLSS. Some DLSS 2.0 games can look excellent but some with a fixed sharpness can look too blurry just like Marvels Avengers. Some FSR games look horrid and oversharpened and need a sharpness slider to tune it in the other direction. Not sure why all games with these upscaling tech can't offer that slider to fine tune the look to your preference.
First iteration...also why are you not testing on 1440p?
This will mean a huge boost in AMD gpu sales and a benefit as well for gamers.
Not all because it's not out for the cards that need it ,Polaris maybe even GCN.
Man this thing is so confusing if we consider the antialiasing method (Is this applied before the upscaling or after? or is this ignored altogether because it's FSR and RSR? IDK)
And the sharpening effect is so apparent on FSR and RSR if this thing is applied in the game that already using the sharpening effect IDK what gonna look like.
11:45 I thought RSR using the same Temporal upscaling algorithm similar to FSR 2.0. or I was reading it wrong?
AA is applied before RSR. RSR is basically the last step in the render pipeline, it just takes the entire image (including the existing AA) and upscales it.
@@KitGuruTech Yeah, I heard it that way too. I think I was just confused by the video explaining the aliasing difference at min 5 or something IDK. anyway. ty sir
Edited: I think they use different method from FSR 1.0 about AA. like they said here: th-cam.com/video/JUQ8j-bpQ1Q/w-d-xo.html
Does rsr supports in a rx5500m laptop
Need Help
Ultrawid in RSR for 1080p
i have monitor 2560x1080 and the RSR don't work in the resolution...
in games the FSR get this valuer resolution for (21:9)
Native 2560x1080.
Ultra 1938x832.
Quality 1680x720.
balanced 1482x636.
performence 1260x540.
but in RSR dont work for 21:9 in 1080p.....if you set 16:9 the RSR work.
I need help fot set 21:9 in the rsr.
these values I got from the god of war game with FSR. Farcry 6 also uses these values for 21:9 at 1080p.
FSR is for the older GPUs. RSR is for the 6000 series.
I cannot agree that DLSS looks better. With DLSS the grass looks like a big chuck of green, even a little blurry. FSR/RSR looks sharper with more details. The latter definitely looks better to me.
You're the type of a guy that oversharpens his pictures to oblivion thinking it looks good.
@@Antagon666 No. I don't use any sharpening filters on purpose. The DLSS picture simply looks worse to me.
idk if fortntie just trash but tested in it only no fps gain when lowering res idk why plus it looks same with rsr on or off...
tbh I prefer using image sharpening only its great on and...
great comparison and explaination
Had to turn video speed up to 1.5 for it to sound like normal talking speed lmao
The shimmer you get with rsr and far is the reason I rarely use them. For example, on my rog ally, games look better running a game at 900p on the 1080p screen with no fsr/rsr compared to running a game at 1080p and using fsr/rsr
can anyone tell me why i cant find RSR in my adrenalin software, its up to date 22.8.2 my laptop has the rx6800m Graphics card with the 5900hx cpu. RSR is no where to be found just VSR
answered my own question maybe this will help someone else .....RSR support currently requires Windows® 10 / Windows® 11 based desktop systems with discrete AMD Radeon™ RX 5000 Series / Radeon™ 6000™ Series Graphics and a full installation of AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 22.3.1 or later. Systems configured for hybrid graphics (i.e., laptop, AIO, mutli-GPU, etc.) are not supported. so that sucks if you have a laptop thanks AMD.
Yes, I am going to be that guy, 1080p isn't a valid testing resolution (except in things like super high frame rate game play) cuz it still looks like crap. It is nearly impossible to get rid of jaggies in 1080p without cranking AA while in even 1440p you only need to use the most basic AA to get rid of the little bit of jaggies that are present. I do fully admit that I am biased against 1080p but I personally think 1080p looks bad and comparing any 1080 image vs any other 1080 image is just an act of futility because both images still look like crap to me. Again, this is all just my personal opinion. :)
As a 1080p user, I agree. AA has to be maxed out to get rid of stairs and then it looks blurry.
I think there is actually a reason for the 5000- and 6000- series to be first out with RSR. Looking at Magpie and Lossless Scaling both applications break freesync support as well as adds a frame of delay. Looking at RSR, it is much more integral to the rasterization process itself, reducing latency while keeping freesync support intact. This is probably the main reason why AMD need to implement it much closer to the hardware/driver level. RDNA and RDNA2 most likely share a very similar rasterization process, meanwhile VEGA has a completely different rasterization process. Looking at Linux the main reason why proton can use FSR on any game has to do that the developers target the translation layer. (you can't use FSR in openGL/Vulkan/native Linux games). RSR works with all APIs and is done on a lower driver level. Overhead seems extremely low as well, so I bet this is most likely the cause of the current limitation to 5000- and 6000 GPUs. However, I too really hope that Vega gets support eventually since it is still being sold in laptops.
ahh yes, everyone's favorite PC game, guardians of the galaxy
i love to see more games using fsr 1/2 dose not metter to me just because i cant replace my old 1080 for a new card at msrp
You don't need machine learning for DLSS did you not hear about the leaked source code... It's hardware locked but doesn't require it.
Of course it doesn't require it. You don't really require a dedicated GPU for gaming either, but the dedicated solution *is* faster.
You can actually use DLSS on the Nvidia TXXX GPUs, the only problem in doing so is that you loose performance & image quality compared to native...
@@markjacobs1086 same thing applies to ray tracing which was proved when rt was hardware unlocked
@@theDragoon007yaboiCJ You can do raytracing entirely in software, Nvidia never claimed otherwise. It's pathetically slow though for real-time usage, especially obvious when you pit a RTX 2060 against a 1080Ti in raytracing.
yeah it's a godsend. lost ark or elden ring work on my 4k display now. my 6700xt has effectively been turned into a 4k capable card in all games now. its lovely.
Hey mate, I have a 6700 XT too plugged into a 4K display but I'm a little confused at how I actually set this up. Am I right that I turn on RSR, and then in-game change my resolution from 4K (3840x2160) down to 1440p or similar and let RSR upscale from there?
@@mitchellthompson7427 thats it mate
Lovely! Thank you
Good video. You are getting the results I am. Slight loss in quality with a boost in frame rate. Not a bad option to have.
I like it for going from 1440p to 4k but anything under 1440 just doesn't look as good to me even upscaled.
I have a 4k screen, that means 1440P RSR activating will be better than my original 2k, graphic image
@@mat77790 that's the idea which it does look better in some instances but I personally don't like the look of 1080p even when it's upscaled. Just a really noticeable difference, at least on my tv anyways. Luckily I can run everything at 1440 anyways for the time being
I have a 2160p monitor, and game at 1440p with a 6600-XT. I'm not sure I see any real advantage to RSR upscaling versus just letting the monitor do the upscaling.
same, gonna try it soon.
well i have a 6700xt but i'm gaming at 1440p anyways
There is a NOTICABLE difference if you haven't tried it by now. I went from 1440p to 1080 RSR and the image quality is similar to looking at a native 1080p screen as opposed to blurry 1080p on a 1440p monitor.
damn... i was looking to change my 5700 xt, i can save my money for something else, rsr work pretty good for me, i can finally play games in 2k, wasnt bad without rsr but i had lil frame drop, now no frame drop.
i have bin trying for hours but i just cant get it to work at all. set down resolution and it does NOTHING. not win exclusive fullscreen not in widowed not in borderless. tested 3 games now and it does nothing. take a screenshot and it obvioulsly still draws 1080p.
AMD RSR is like Lossless Scaling and Magpie scaling quality ?
I have an RX 480 8gb model and this would have helped alot
I have same card. I use magic Borderless and Lossless Scaling combined. Set custom resolution with Magic Borderless. Then upscale with Lossless Scaling. Set any resolution you want with magic Borderless. Then upscale with Lossless Scaling.
Does RSR work with the fury X?
No, RX 5000 series or newer
I’d just wait for modded drivers to release, maybe they’ll add support for older cards. That’s how I got full FSR support on my old R9 380
@@KitGuruTech well shit, i just bought a fury x waterblock in the hopes that between that and rsr i could make it last till the gpu shortage is over
I’m sure if RSR worked on architectures older than RDNA then they would have done it when DLSS came out.
There's no reason this wouldn't work on older generations. I mean it works on older Nvidia GPU's (9/10 series)
If you have compatible 1080p monitor, you can use AMD virtual super resolution and then use RSR / FSR to try things out. It's a great tool to have.
Downscale then upscale? Is it worth?
@@RSKenan my bad. it seems that RSR can only be used to upscale from sub native resolution to native. can't upscale to virtual 4K.
however FSR can upscale things to 4K even with 1080p native resolution.
@@warnacokelat RSR and FSR are close to similar. Both of them are upscaler (performance booster). So, how did FSR can do that? If you want to render 4K @ 1080p monitor, you could use Virtual Super Resolution like you did before (decrease performance).
I have 5700XT. Do I lower resolution from 1080 down to what? AMD says 1600x900 when I turn on RSR for Battlefield 2042. Which is actually supported surprisingly! Can't even tell if frames went up or not. But it looked fuzzy. Low settings on graphics .
@@allenanalla2549 If you use 1080p monitor, you have to manually set your game resolution below 1080p to make RSR works. If the game support FSR, just enabled it and then the game engine automatically downgrade your in game resolution and upscale it. In my opinion, RSR and FSR works well on native resolution above 1440p.
Hi, you are compare DLSS and RSR, two different GPU, I believe u forget to compare Nvidia vs AMD in native mode. Because both GPU image was render a little different.
So if FSR and RSR do the same thing whit is the difference between them?
RSR works for every game, it works on the driver software level.
FSR must be implemented into game. FSR is considered earlier in "creating frame" than RSR, which should result in better quality (thus their advice to pick FSR over RSR). RSR is driver solution, you can use it on ANY game. Like I played Sacred Gold today thanks to this solution
Magic Borderless and Lossless Scaling is all you need. It's basically the same thing as RSR
If you're still using 1080p I highly recommend upgrading to at least 1440p! The difference is HUGE when gaming!
If you're honest with yourself, you will admit that RSR doesn't do much. If you drop the resolution to 1440p and turn RSR on, the result isn't anywhere near 4k. The image enhancement is so slight you won't really notice its on until you toggle it back and forth using the the hot key alt-U. You will have to look at the smallest details to even see the change. RSR is 1440p very slightly enhanced.
So they rebranded FSR2.0 to RSR ?
What happened to FSR 2.0 ?
FSR 2.0 will be released on 2nd quarter this year
Different things m8
@@TheAngelobarker they have me confused, and I'm a geek.
AMD is worse then Ms with Xbox naming 🤣
@@bosanac033 nah fsr 2.0 is temporal upscaler rsr is just driver level fsr 1.0.
Sadly it absolutely DOES NOT look like 1440p, but hey, it did get me from 60fps to 120fps and the difference is pretty mild. Good invention this is why we buy AMD every single time man.
Where is the frame rate ?
Have Deus Ex Mankind Divided, with a 2K monitor... I lowered the in-game resolution one level... Activated RSR... And image was very bad. Especially comparing with native 4K.
RX 6500XT users should be a bit happy today. 😊
Because it requires Matrix Cores?