The Best Automatic Everyday Watch Under $500: Seiko SRPG27 vs Hamilton Khaki Field H70455533

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 963

  • @AK-rq1cz
    @AK-rq1cz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +854

    Your equal enthusiasm for a $10 Casio and a $30,000 Rolex is incredible, you're a true enthusiast and could not be further from snobbery. Great production as always

    • @theurbangentry
      @theurbangentry  3 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      Thank you so much!!!
      Very kind of you to say, onwards and upwards
      Best regards,
      TGV

    • @peterkull8354
      @peterkull8354 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      That´s real love for our tickers. TGV even loves the quartz ones.

    • @oscarosullivan4513
      @oscarosullivan4513 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Very enjoyable video my Amphibia has a snap date. But then again the movements are inspired by Swiss movements

    • @oscarosullivan4513
      @oscarosullivan4513 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I imagine Saul Berenson from Homeland wearing the Hamilton on a leather strap upside down

    • @johnpisuena7297
      @johnpisuena7297 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      100% agree 😊 maybe next time a lowend and highend iconic chronograph? Kudos as usual..

  • @wellthoughtoutfishing1534
    @wellthoughtoutfishing1534 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    It's 2023. The Seiko is less than $200. The Hamilton is still plus $500. At these prices, the Seiko is excellent. I personally love the applied numerals on the Seiko.

    • @famimame
      @famimame 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I just bought the SRPG, the applied numerals are surprisingly very reflective making it legible in the dark with just a hint of light! Love it

    • @marvean2519
      @marvean2519 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They also have a 36mm version now

    • @icyhot9783
      @icyhot9783 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I like the ETA 2824 in the Hamilton, but the looks of the blue SRPG was just too much to pass on. The 6R36 movement is meh out of the box, but with a bit of patience and work it can run very well. I love the modding options for Seikos. You can do practically anything with them. They are my tinkering watches, and I buy them knowing I likely will do something to them. My Swiss watches are generally bought the way I like them and rarely even change a strap on them. Basically saying there's room for both. If you change anything on a Swiss watch, it usually takes the value right to zero. Not so on the Seikos, unless your talking about the higher end Grand Seikos.

  • @WhistlerButt
    @WhistlerButt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +303

    At the beginning of Covid I lost my job. I spent many hours researching the watch I would purchase for myself once I landed back on my feet and the Hamilton Khaki Field on a bracelet was my choice. It was affordable enough that It wasn't an irresponsible purchase for somebody in a tricky financial situation, but at the same time substantial enough that I knew I would be happy with it years down the road. Nearly 4 months later it hasn't left my wrist and I still enjoy it every time I put it on.

    • @taham33
      @taham33 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      >Lose job
      >Buy watch
      Goodness, gracious, great balls of fire

    • @icanseeumad
      @icanseeumad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      @@taham33 I understood here that the watch was a celebration for a new job ;)

    • @oscarosullivan4513
      @oscarosullivan4513 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I bought my Amphibia 710379 because of the pandemic

    • @nobbynoris
      @nobbynoris 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@oscarosullivan4513 So you could time the virus?

    • @oscarosullivan4513
      @oscarosullivan4513 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nobbynoris Not really

  • @Angry_Gnome
    @Angry_Gnome 3 ปีที่แล้ว +197

    This isn't really close...The Seiko is just completely outclassed here. From a spec standpoint, the new Alpinist would probably match up better.

    • @dbryant965
      @dbryant965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      I agree, but the Alpinist is in a higher price range. Good luck finding one under $500

    • @jarvas2681
      @jarvas2681 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      My thoughts exactly... All though the new Alpinist puts itself out of the conversation with pricing. The baby Alpinist is closer in price, but not really a traditional field watch. Rather more of an explorer feel. Any way, I agree with the Alpinist being a more relevant/fair comparison

    • @franqueee
      @franqueee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@dbryant965 The baby alpinist tho. Similar quality, better spec (perhaps) and very similar price range

    • @sylinmino
      @sylinmino 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      This review does seem like a solid demonstration of, "You get what you pay for." Similar designs, similar functionality, but for double the price, significant upgrades in all the places where it counts.

    • @peterlaurence-couzens8913
      @peterlaurence-couzens8913 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Disagree, the Seiko is half the price, bracelet (variable quality I know), day complication, movement can be serviced, and regulated almost anywhere. Now if you’re talking of the previous Khaki auto with the 2824-2 movement the Hamilton wins on servicing and smooth sweep etc. 80hrs reserve isn’t really a thing is it? So you wear your watch mon to Friday and wear something nicer on the weekend and put it back on Monday without having to go to the strenuous and very difficult task of re setting again on Monday……….so the weekend watch has to have a 120hr reserve otherwise you have the monumental chore of setting that every weekend! Looks like you’ll be wearing an Oris on the weekend, and the Hamilton on the week. Hmmm……….

  • @123azin
    @123azin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    I recently got the seiko srpg29. It’s subjective but I find the finish, the domed crystal brushed numbers, the frosted deep blue dial and general refinement for the price outstanding. It doesn’t try to be a Rolex or any other watch but beats to the march of its own horological drum.

    • @Chatsu8o
      @Chatsu8o 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I've got the exact same one. I don't mind the weight nor size of it. It catches the light in nice ways, in general I like it a lot. But, my biggest nay on it is the scratch I now have to look at due to the hardlex. Maybe sapphire wouldn't have saved it, but it nags the mind that it could've.

    • @snufkinsnufkin2528
      @snufkinsnufkin2528 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I got the srpj81 which is really similar to the srpg and for half the price of the hamilton I think it is very much better if money is an issue

    • @dostoevsky90
      @dostoevsky90 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don’t you find the reflection a bit inconvinient….

    • @robertbeirne9813
      @robertbeirne9813 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Chatsu8oI also have the blue SRPG, but the previous owner replaced the crystal with sapphire. Now I have to find the right leather strap for it.

  • @Podcastage
    @Podcastage 3 ปีที่แล้ว +292

    The Hamilton khaki is absolutely outstanding.

    • @JFinns
      @JFinns 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Agreed, got the hammy's little brother the Field Mechanical it's my favorite daily.

    • @renderizaconcharlie
      @renderizaconcharlie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      How about lume? My khaki winding mechanical is dissapointing

    • @oscarosullivan4513
      @oscarosullivan4513 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Carlos this 38mm automatic looks better

    • @muscularibuprofen69
      @muscularibuprofen69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@renderizaconcharlie Lume is fine

    • @davidcoleman2796
      @davidcoleman2796 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I sold mine. I was just not wearing it .

  • @drmanhattan225
    @drmanhattan225 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    What I really love about these videos is not only do you get a comprehensive breakdown of the technical specifications, but you are also given a history lesson. As a history/WW2 buff I feel I want this watch even more now. Thanks for converting me from the Apple Watch to a real watch!

  • @mikescafidi
    @mikescafidi ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Had the Hamilton Khaki 38 Auto. Sold it. Now have an SRPG27. For my 7” wrist, the 38mm Hamilton Khaki wears way to small. However, thanks to its ridiculously long lugs, the 42mm is ghastly. The 40mm SRPG27 is far better proportioned for average wrist sizes. If you have small wrists, the 38mm Khaki will fit you better. If you have huge wrists, the 42mm Khaki will fit better. But for those of us with 7-7.5” wrists, the 40mm SRPG27 is the sweet spot.

    • @F87_Frank
      @F87_Frank 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I just ordered a 38mm khaki and i also have a 7" wrist, i ordered a few different nato straps for it though cause they seem to make a watch look slightly bigger so hopefully that works

    • @bandaidbandito
      @bandaidbandito 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Having this same dilemma

  • @HRM.H
    @HRM.H 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Have owned the khaki field auto in 38mm. It's been my daily for a while now, just the perfect grab and go piece. So accurate that i only have to set the time once every 1 or 2 months

    • @theurbangentry
      @theurbangentry  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I am fighting myself not to buy one, such cool watches.
      Perfect watches for the money really.
      Thank you Thomas,
      Best regards,
      TGV

    • @jipke
      @jipke 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theurbangentry Why would you buy one? You owned one (see your review of this piece). Something made you decide to sell it in the end, so you 'fighting not to buy one' makes no sense.

  • @Thinker_Thunker
    @Thinker_Thunker 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I actually bought my khaki after one of your reviews. I've owned it for a few years and absolutely love it. I'm a sucker for a nice field watch.

    • @theurbangentry
      @theurbangentry  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So glad to hear it, I love comments like this.
      Wear it with pride my friend, here's to many more years!!! 😎🥂
      Thank you and best regards,
      TGV

  • @rajdixit1605
    @rajdixit1605 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    I recently ordered an SRPG39 (blue dial, leather strap); should arrive this week. The Hammy is nicer looking (arguably), but it's not $300 nicer in my opinion. The Seiko goes for $275, the Hammy goes for $575 (at least where I am). Can't go wrong with either one, though. Excellent video. You just gained a new subscriber!

    • @EvilEye1986
      @EvilEye1986 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you can get the hamilton at duty free shops for 475.

    • @ziyovuddinturdialiev8503
      @ziyovuddinturdialiev8503 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hamilton Khaki field automatic 38mm is costs 795$

  • @CS-wo5hd
    @CS-wo5hd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I've had the Khaki King for a few years now and I still Love it just as much as the day My Wife gave it to me as a birthday present. Every evening when I get home from work, I look forward to changing from the dress shirt and Aquaracer, to shorts, t shirt, and the comfy Hamilton on a well broken in leather strap. It's time to destress. The quality is just amazing and never gets old.

    • @whereRbearsTeeth
      @whereRbearsTeeth 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If an Aquaracer is your “nice” watch , then you really need to up your game lol.

    • @immabee542
      @immabee542 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@whereRbearsTeeth let me guess - your nice watch is nautilus 5711

  • @safwanc3043
    @safwanc3043 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I’ve owned the Hamilton for just over a year now and it’s held up as my favourite watch out of my collection. My favourite go-to piece and the power reserve really does shine over everything else I own. Solid piece and I’d defo recommend

    • @simplevoicereviewssvr6418
      @simplevoicereviewssvr6418 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Same, wore it for few days and took it off to wear a Seiko 5 diver, and I came back to the Hamilton 4 days later and still ticking, then Seiko lasts 2 days and stops when taken off and not worn

    • @YakupCoskun024
      @YakupCoskun024 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello bro, what is the disadvantage of not having AR coating?

    • @safwanc3043
      @safwanc3043 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@YakupCoskun024 you often get a glare from the lighting and it reduces legibility

  • @O1iverL
    @O1iverL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Got my Khaki Field Mechanical four days ago and it's only running 1 second slow after nearly 100 hours. Definitely the best mechanical watch under $500 in my opinion. Was a tough choice between the mechanical and the automatic, but I'm very happy with the one I got.

  • @noegenesis
    @noegenesis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I've got the Hammy and I absolutely love it. I actually got it because of TGV videos.
    Much love, keep up the great work!

  • @andywilliams4887
    @andywilliams4887 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Choose the Hamilton every time guys. It's subjective I know, but the quality and accuracy for the money is outstanding. My go-to watch when not wearing my Rolex Sub 16610 or Omega Seamaster 300.

  • @JJherne
    @JJherne 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Sitting here wearing my Khaki King (on a Nato) so I'm a tad biased. Love a Seiko diver (I have one) but imo the Hammy field watch is hard to beat by anything at this price point. Good discussion point TGV.

  • @Austionous
    @Austionous 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Hamilton Khaki Automatic is my everyday watch and I absolutely adore it. It looks wonderful on a black and grey NATO or the "Bond" NATO strap as well!

    • @davidcoleman2796
      @davidcoleman2796 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had mine on the black and gray nato. It did look good . The lugs were just a little long for me .

  • @tomdestryjr.4261
    @tomdestryjr.4261 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I have the 42mm version of the Hamilton Khaki Field and it is absolutely one of my favorites. I currently have it on a NATO strap, which offsets the increased weight of the 42mm, and I agree with TGV that the large crown makes setting the watch extremely easy. I was fortunate enough to get it new for under $400, but even at full retail I would recommend it for anyone looking for a great field watch.

    • @theurbangentry
      @theurbangentry  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      So glad to hear and you bring up a great point, kudos to Hamilton for offering a variety of sizes so all wrists are pleased. Thank you for the excellent comment.
      Best regards,
      TGV

    • @eddieforbes3054
      @eddieforbes3054 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I am considering the 42mm HKF myself. What is your wrist size please?

    • @oscarosullivan4513
      @oscarosullivan4513 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What about regulation

    • @tomdestryjr.4261
      @tomdestryjr.4261 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@eddieforbes3054 - My wrist size is 7".

    • @tomdestryjr.4261
      @tomdestryjr.4261 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@oscarosullivan4513 - I believe that TGV covers this topic in his video. Since I'm retired I really don't worry about the time being off a bit and therefore regulation is not a priority for me. :)

  • @quiterioalbertobaezbenitez5739
    @quiterioalbertobaezbenitez5739 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant!
    Also I would choose the Hami... a 4 wheel drive watch!
    Thank you!
    Saludos!!

  • @lundsweden
    @lundsweden 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Both beautiful watches IMO. I like the look of the Hamilton a little more, but the clean dial on the Seiko probably makes it more versatile with casual, and dressy looks. Seiko is obviously less expensive too, and would have superiour lume (Seiko is always good here, whether budget or expensive).

  • @Stunl3y
    @Stunl3y 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The Seiko looks so complete it to me looks like the watch for any occasion , the way everything is rounded and curved , its a gorgeous watch imo and for 500 is a steal I do think the Hamilton beats it hands down on its luminosity. I love these videos its great learning the history behind watches and watch makers

  • @rob45x
    @rob45x 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Watching this wearing my hamilton khaki field 38 auto on its original bracelet. Loving this watch. I lusted after a explorer for a while but this hamilton is all I need !

    • @goemboeck
      @goemboeck 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ^ This could be my comment from word to word.

    • @rob45x
      @rob45x 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@goemboeck yeah all I can say is that I'm in love.

  • @matgorelsp
    @matgorelsp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hamilton would be my pick. That all black one is very nice.

  • @valengreymoon5623
    @valengreymoon5623 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I picked up the SRPG037 (black dial, bead-blasted case on a nato strap) from Island a couple months ago, and I'm quite happy with it. I did swap out the nato for an OEM Seiko 2 piece nylon strap like the one on its older brother. After break-in time and a bit of a tweak to the regulator, it runs about +1 a day now.

  • @mattstephens8561
    @mattstephens8561 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I'm currently wearing the 2824-2 movement version of the Hammy and it's hands down my favorite every day watch of all time. It checks all the boxes for me and the only way it leaves my collection is if one day I can afford the Sinn 556i.

    • @thohaabqary9032
      @thohaabqary9032 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm planning to pick one up (with ETA 2824-2) as it is available with a good price.
      Is there any issues or how is the experience for you so far, bro?

    • @mattstephens8561
      @mattstephens8561 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thohaabqary9032 no issues at all! I'm not even the original owner and mine has been well loved and still runs like an absolute champ. I highly recommend it.

  • @coled82595
    @coled82595 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    The black khaki auto is more popular but I'd definitely suggest to people to check out the silver dial version too. I went with that one as it can easily be dressed up more than the black dial with a nice crocodile or suede strap while also being able to be worn very casually on a rubber or nato strap just like the black dial.

    • @oshintaoo
      @oshintaoo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Totally agree,I have already check that one I’m close to buy it.

  • @kriskabin
    @kriskabin ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have the silver faced version of this hammy. Daily worn it for 2yrs & it's held up wonderfully.
    Pros: perfect size & weight. Crown is easy to get a hold of. The neutral color of the all silver Khaki makes it a super strap monster!
    Negatives: The price has gone up $200 since I bought mine new off Amazon. ( It's a great watch, but I wouldn't pay what they're asking for it now.) The original leather strap that it comes with is way too thick, small & hard. And it didn't have spring pins, so I had to ruin it cutting it off.🤨 Alligator leather straps of any color look A LOT better on it,..feel much better too. In low light, the hands are tuff to read on the silver face, & the lume isn't the best.
    Yeah, all being considered, I love my little silver hammy. 👍

  • @Chrissepisje
    @Chrissepisje 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I love these video's of yours. The combination of history, the editing, the pleasant voice-over and the enthusiasm are stellar. Appreciate you making these.
    Here, I also give the nod to the Hammie because of the sapphire. In all fairness, the previous Seiko 5 BigMil also started at an MRSP of 200 Euro's, and Seiko's sink in price. That said, they did indeed cock up the design of the Seiko by making it super thick. That even turned me off the modern 1959 Alpinist.
    As far as history goes, Hamilton / Buren / Heuer were also working together on the 1969 race towards the first automatic chronograph, which pitted them against Zenith and Seiko respectively. The photo finish that this resulted in still causes debate over who actually delivered the first automatic chronograph. Hamilton was also behind the Pulsar, the first LED quartz watch, worn by presidents, hobnobs and famous folks alike, and which sparked the 1970's LED watch craze.
    I'm an enormous Seiko fanboi, but they really need to shave 2mm off those Seiko's and pop a sapphire crystal on there. 11mm for a field watch, like the old SNZG11J1 I had, is fantastic, but 13mm for a simple three hander is poppycock.

  • @ChaseAHawk
    @ChaseAHawk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My Seiko shines when working in a metal work shop I don’t mind the wear on the mineral glass and daily metal dust giving it a premature scratch wear. At $220 it’s repairable or replaceable. While I love that Hamilton I wouldn’t want to wear it at my work at that price. It’s 2024 , two years after you made this video and my Seiko is doing great while it looks like it was at war. Keep up the great work and cheers! 🙌👊🎯

  • @coldsoldier313
    @coldsoldier313 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I was already eyeing the Hamilton Khaki Field and this video just sealed the deal for me.
    Thanks TGV!!!

  • @jonasb6440
    @jonasb6440 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    At this point in time I’m looking at the Seiko for about 275€ and the Hamilton for 745€. Honestly I’ve been looking at the Hamilton for the last couple of weeks and would love to get it and I like it more then the Seiko that’s for sure. But I’m not sure if it’s worth 500€ more for me personally so I’m really questioning which one to get rn

  • @bwavert
    @bwavert 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This past year was a difficult one for sure. I lost one of my parents.. it has and still does me a great deal of pain. I had been researching the KFA 38mm for a while and I figured it would be a good Memento Mori.
    Needless to say, I am still in the honeymoon phase with the Hamilton, months and months after the purchase. It is my most valued timepiece because of what it means to me.
    Thanks for transmitting the passion TGV!
    Upwards and squidwards.

    • @Betelgeuse1991
      @Betelgeuse1991 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Condolences to you and your family on your loss.

    • @bwavert
      @bwavert 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Betelgeuse1991 Thank you

  • @DjRjSolarStar
    @DjRjSolarStar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wearing my Khaki Automatic Old Paper Dial right now and saw your video haha. I personally find mine the most handsome variant, but that's why I bought it of course.

  • @junwoojang2941
    @junwoojang2941 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I miss the dual videos, glad that you are bringing this series back.

  • @TheExtenacia
    @TheExtenacia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I still have my Hamilton khaki watch that I bought in 2013. A few days ago, I got a Seiko SRPG35 and fell in love with the look just as I was before as Hamilton.

  • @77cjam
    @77cjam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Two very good looking watches and if you pushed me to choose think it would be the Hamilton. I tend to have a preference to Japanese watches, however the Hammy just seems to ooze class and works effortlessly. However I have to say I love the original Seiko ww2 watches at the start. Incredible. Fantastic detailed history, visuals and commentary as always sir. Thoroughly enjoyed and pleased to get the notification through during the day rather than at my bedtime! Bonus! 👍. Hope all is well with you and your family

    • @theurbangentry
      @theurbangentry  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you Chris, this was due to be posted last night but technical issues at YT prevented it.
      I will strongly consider day time postings in future. As for the Seiko ww2, I could not agree more, imagine a proper resissue of that!!! 🤞🤞🔥🔥
      Best regards,
      TGV

    • @77cjam
      @77cjam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@theurbangentry Wow I would definitely be first inline for that re-issue!!! 👍

  • @seriousalti
    @seriousalti 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have the Hamilton 42mm Khaki Automatic and the Weiss 42mm Standard Issue Field Watch rotating through my field watch duties. Love them both for how amazing they are in their own right.

  • @mattys1467
    @mattys1467 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Hamilton and Seiko, what a great duo. Seiko is getting a lot of stick at the moment with price increases and QC issues. I will always adore their innovation and originality. Hamilton are the best luxury entry brand in my opinion.
    Fabulous review as ever 👏

  • @Crackers2549
    @Crackers2549 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    TGV... I have quite a few Seiko's and I love them but I have to tell you my Khaki King keeps incredible time and it's one of my favorites, love that watch....! I would have to go with the Hamilton... Actually I have a Seiko Alpinist and I do love that watch one of my other favorite daily drivers but the Hamilton is more accurate over that watch too ....For me, the Hamilton all day long...Great review TGV, agree with you as usual 100%...GG...IN

  • @canonyeo4286
    @canonyeo4286 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This channel is about enjoying watches at every price points at its best.

  • @standaman2528
    @standaman2528 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I already moved on from Seiko. No more Seiko for me. Quality control (misaligned bezel, etc.) have been excruciatingly painful; never mind you're paying 4 digits for a Seiko, you will still find annoying quality control issues. I have replaced Seiko with independent watch maker (using Seiko NH movements) for quite a while and I have burned the bridge behind me. I've been happy so far. Hamilton, on the other hand, have been constantly maintaining their quality and quite persistent in offering exceptional value proposition. I'm with Hamilton. I'm done with Seiko.
    Excellent video and analysis! Thank you and keep up the good work!

  • @timemeasured9137
    @timemeasured9137 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When it comes to field watches, Hamilton khaki is Top choice!!!

  • @paulsimpson203
    @paulsimpson203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I recently got the Seiko Srpg35 and the Hamilton khaki field automatic 38mm and I am enjoying both of them because of your honest review on both watches they are fantastic and beautiful and I enjoy watching your reviews

  • @sylinmino
    @sylinmino 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    This review does seem like a solid demonstration of, "You get what you pay for." Similar designs, similar functionality, but for double the price, significant upgrades in all the places where it counts.

    • @privacyhelp
      @privacyhelp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      LOL all watches has similiar functionality.. for showing the time

    • @seybertooth9282
      @seybertooth9282 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I really don't think you get that much more for TWICE the money. Besides, the weird embossed ring on the dial of the Hamilton bothers me.

    • @nicholaskenneth113
      @nicholaskenneth113 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@seybertooth9282That's what I've been saying. With the Hamilton, you're paying over 2x the price for maybe 50% "more watch" compared to the Seiko.

  • @PaintGuy
    @PaintGuy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I sold my Tudor BB58 because I didn’t like the feel of it when winding the watch. The outside edge of the crown is difficult to grip. The Ergonomics of the crown are surprisingly important.
    That “Hami” looks like a winner to me. 👍🏽

  • @Every_Day_Adventure
    @Every_Day_Adventure 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have the Hamilton in my collection on the beautiful bracelet and it keeps excellent time. When worn daily on my wrist it is generally +1 sec/day or better. I bought the 38mm over the 42mm because like you said it is reminiscent of the Rolex Explorer which is a stretch goal for me. Great job again TGV.

  • @thomasmoffatt
    @thomasmoffatt ปีที่แล้ว

    I have worn my SRPG27 for the past month. Fits well on my 8 in. wrist and a fast glance for the time is sufficient. No scratches on bezel or on dome in first month, and just love the look. Consistently 7 sec. slow.

  • @mrbacchus6127
    @mrbacchus6127 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Seiko is great but the Hammy is the affordable GOAT. Reminds me I have to wear my Hammy more. Thanks for the vid, I never fail to learn something new about horology

  • @Scout-nj7xj
    @Scout-nj7xj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    From my experience the Hamilton movements ETA are so much more accurate than offerings from Seiko. Hamilton QC excellent, Seiko not so much. Hamilton has the magic. Your videos are really very good indeed.

  • @craigkovach8475
    @craigkovach8475 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    When seen side-by-side, the clarity and luster of a sapphire crystal compared to hardlex really stands out.

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Really? I can't see any difference between my sapphire and mineral crystals. Both are just as crystal clear. What is it that you see?

    • @tiagodvt
      @tiagodvt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@varanid9 Same..I think that it is in the minds of people. It is good to have a sapphire crystal of course, but not having one wouldn't stop me from buying a watch if I liked everything else. I feel the same way about people replacing perfectly good mineral crystals out the box - I mean, if it ain't broke...one could simply wait for it to scratch (if it ever did!) to replace it. Visually, just like you, I see no difference and I own both types. I think that would depend more on the type of anti reflective coating, not on the type of crystal.
      Well, about the watches compared on this video...they are simply not comparable quality and price wise, of course. They are similar in the fact that they are both field watches and have some similarities in terms of design - that's it. I like them both nonetheless. The Seiko is great at half the price of the Hamilton. If one could spend more, I'd avise to get the Hamilton (but I know that 200bucks is a lot of money for a lot of people), so there's a market for the two - no doubt.

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tiagodvt I've never owned a Hamilton, but I've had a few other Swiss watches in the $2,000-ish range and, honestly, I find Seikos compare well against them. Sure, Seikos exhibit less attention to detail, but, a lot of the differences seem more a product of an almost alien mind set than true qualitative differences. My Marinemaster has better fit and finish than my Omega Seamaster Coax has or either of my Rolexes had. Yet, it doesn't even come regulated from the factory. Different priorities reflecting a different culture. I almost consider my Seiko collection as a separate thing from my watch collection.

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tiagodvt History is important to me and being a dive watch lover, I find Seiko's pedigree there to be unmatched. However, if I wanted a field watch, I'd totally go Hamilton.

    • @tiagodvt
      @tiagodvt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@varanid9 Seiko is great, I have several of them as well. I was just refering to the watches shown on the video - an entry level Seiko 5, which can't be compared to the Hamilton price or quality wise (finishing, crystal, bracelet, etc). But I'd consider it a great watch and one with a market for it - like I said not everyone can spend 500bucks on a watch. And the Seiko has other colorways, which also help.
      But of course Seiko has better watches than that Hamilton, just not on the 5 range.

  • @speedyhx
    @speedyhx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video. A few things have changed in 2 years. As of the timing of this comment - the Hamilton Field is retailing at $695 USD and the Seiko at just above $200 on sale (retail of $275).

  • @chronocommander007
    @chronocommander007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for the great presentation and review. I'd have to give the Hamilton the nod, mostly because I prefer the Hamilton's dial and hands.

  • @longobardialfonso8376
    @longobardialfonso8376 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They are two very good watches. Although it must be said that the Khaki Field is of another level, as regards the finishes, the beauty of the dial, and above all as regards the mechanical movement, an H 10 with 80 hours of power reserve. Therefore, the Seiko is proposed as a good cheaper alternative ... for those who may not want to spend the money needed to buy the Hamilton!

  • @steffenaarsnes8066
    @steffenaarsnes8066 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    How is this a fair comparison though? According to the prices when introducing the watches in the video the Hamilton is over twice the price of the Seiko ($300 more) and closer to $600 rather than below the $500 mark as is the premise of the video.

    • @85MAYS
      @85MAYS 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      $399 on Jomashop

    • @runningawayvagabond5876
      @runningawayvagabond5876 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      So you’re comparing the street price to the MSRP of the Seiko?
      Try street price to street price, the Ham is back to being pretty close to about twice as much and the original argument stands.

    • @Pori9392
      @Pori9392 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have to agree. Essentially the Hamilton is twice the price of the Seiko.

    • @runningawayvagabond5876
      @runningawayvagabond5876 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Epigmenio Vazquez Well, you just confirmed the OP's position. You can get the new Seiko field for in the $200's US funds. So your Hamilton cost close to twice what the Seiko does.

  • @paulkinder8440
    @paulkinder8440 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've just recently got myself an Hamilton Khaki Field watch, the same model and strap as the one that you are comparing. I think it's beautiful well made watch.

  • @alexm2113
    @alexm2113 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The Seiko is a great watch for sure, but for me the Hamilton is the winner. Hamilton field watches have serious historical significance in terms of the US military and that's very important to me.

    • @phildevereux9136
      @phildevereux9136 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've got a Hamilton...now I want that Seiko

  • @justinstubblefield7921
    @justinstubblefield7921 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have wore this exact Seiko SRPG for about a year and a half solid. My two biggest gripes are the hardlex crystal and the power reserve.
    If this is a field watch, and for what this watch costs, there is no reason it shouldn't have a sapphire crystal. I'm pretty careful with my watches for the most part and I still picked up some scuffs on this hardlex that bug me.
    I ordered the 42mm version of the Hamilton on bracelet, so cannot wait for that to arrive this week!

    • @daveLin104
      @daveLin104 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How have they compared ?

  • @jasonhall10
    @jasonhall10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The editing on this channel is just next level. Well done.

  • @OXavierNeto
    @OXavierNeto 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As always great content! Wearing my Hamilton Khaki Titanium right now and that´s a really hard piece to beat considering its value * history * quality combination. Cheers from Brazil!

  • @jandekker6008
    @jandekker6008 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not sure this is all that fair really, as the 'Hammy' is around three times the price of the Seiko. I can get the Seiko quite widely for about £210, but the Hamilton will set me back £640 in most places. I see one seller has it for £480, but that's an outlier. Either way, it wasn't even 'under $500' when you reviewed it, so I wonder if the two watches are even in the same market segment. That said, the Hamilton does look lovely and I'm really interested in it!

  • @mightbesherwood1313
    @mightbesherwood1313 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Not to forget the Timex MK1, though that's more of a munitions watch because the quartz movement ticks like a bomb.

  • @asterixky
    @asterixky 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's funny to see your French farmer's knife "The Opinel" 8:34 with your logo on it, mixed with beautiful watches.

  • @tengkuariputra3959
    @tengkuariputra3959 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love the intro! It’s just so mesmerizing, do you have that soundtrack available? Btw I love watching your videos, I’ve learned so much about watches, culture and history it’s brilliant! Started watching 7 years ago when I was 17 and this is the first time I’m commenting in this community! Hello 👋🏾

    • @theurbangentry
      @theurbangentry  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      So cool to hear from somebody that has been in the Gentry so long!!! A million thank yous for your support. Regarding the soundtrack, I will see what I can do. A downloadable mixtape could be a cool idea. I will have to look into it.
      Onwards and upwards my friend!
      Best regards,
      TGV

  • @EldritchAugur
    @EldritchAugur 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've worn the 38mm Hamilton Khaki for the last few years I was in college. Now that I've got my first proper job I actually got a speedy reduced that I've been lusting after for years but I'll definitely still wear my little Hamilton once in a while.
    The thing has been bulletproof. I've literally worn it to the top of a mountain in the Smoky Mountains national park. It's definitely one of the best watches you can buy for so cheap.

  • @gervers
    @gervers 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    It’s the Hamilton for me at this price point! I use my Hamilton Khaki Navy GMT as my pilots watch and travel watch all the time and have done for the 5 years I’ve owned it. It’s so legible, accurate and rugged yet I can wear it with anything from Jeans/shorts and t shirt to lounge suit.

  • @castin5244
    @castin5244 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That exact model of Khaki is basically my end game.
    I know its not even close to an expensive watch, but its a lot for me and I just hope they're still available by the time I'm financially sound enough to justify it.

  • @AlanJWatkins
    @AlanJWatkins 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Seiko is now selling for just over $200, can't find the Hamilton for under $400. To me, that definitely changes things for me.

    • @AlanJWatkins
      @AlanJWatkins 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Update: I just got an srpg29 on valentine day sale for $192. It's the bracelet blue dial version.
      My first impressions are that while if you are expecting a small field watch, you will be disappointed, it's still not a "big watch" ...by today's standards at least . I have 6.75 inch wrist and it's a chunky definitely, and I would prefer smaller, but All in all, wears fine on me. I did take it off the bracelet, but it was much nicer than expected. I just don't like bracelet style in general. I only got bracelet version for applied numbers and nicer dial.
      I previously had a snk809, I found it too small all the way around.
      I have handled the Hamilton before and agree it's worth $100 more. If I found it for $300, I might have gotten it instead ($200-$300 was my target budget).
      I am saving up for a $1k plus watch, so didn't want to put more out than selling my current sport and dress watches this is replacing would net. I intend to keep this for a year or so til that purchase, but if I was looking more long term, I think the Hamilton would be a better choice. That said, I think this is a great deal at $200.
      Been wearing for 48 hours now, and it's only gained 3-4 seconds.

    • @user-sg6xv2kb8s
      @user-sg6xv2kb8s 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here, running +3 and looks solid as a rock. Has a hint of vintage and hint of sinn in the right light. I love it. Cheap but very well done. Paid $178 on a bracelet brand new, bargain of the century. The bracelet works great.

    • @dimitris470
      @dimitris470 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Especially if you take into consideration the cost of a service

  • @xClunky
    @xClunky 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't know where you buy your watches but where I am there is a price difference at the minium 250 USD between these two. For that big a difference, even though I absolutely love the Hamilton, the Seiko is definitely the better buy unless you're flushed with cash.

  • @RichsRantMMAofficialchannel
    @RichsRantMMAofficialchannel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    The Hamilton is in another league!

  • @ILostMyKeys
    @ILostMyKeys 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi TGV,
    Just got a Hamilton Khaki (H70555533) today as my first very automatic watch and I love it! Your attitude and humble demeanour towards all types of watches no matter the make or price made me an instant fan! Thanks for everything! -MN

  • @canadianwatchmonkey3992
    @canadianwatchmonkey3992 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This head to head is not even close. The Hamilton is stunning 😍

  • @johnfranklin6394
    @johnfranklin6394 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wearing my Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic on a nato today. Just picked it up used and gifted the steel bracelet to my son who also has the watch. Loving it so far.

    • @theurbangentry
      @theurbangentry  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolute class, nothing like one of these on a Nato.
      Enjoy and thank you John.
      Best regards,
      TGV

    • @johnfranklin6394
      @johnfranklin6394 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theurbangentry forgot to mention, we both have the 38mm due to our skinny wrists. My son is also wearing his today as it's A level results day here in Blighty. Brought him good fortune, and he's off to read history at his first choice, the University of Exeter!

  • @manasraut9377
    @manasraut9377 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    And yet another Japan v Swiss. I can never get tired of this debate. But regardless of the country, they are both great watches.

  • @svelinov
    @svelinov ปีที่แล้ว

    The proper value of your videos is that you learn people to appreciate and enjoy in affordable watches as much as in expensive ones. Excellent videos with steap learning curve after each session. Bravo!!!

  • @matadorputo
    @matadorputo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’ll go for the seiko quality’s good and price is affordable 👍🏻

  • @gwapogreg5837
    @gwapogreg5837 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a Rolex sub since new in 1986 and a new Explorer as well as a travel watch an Orient Kamasu.But my go to watch I can wear everyday no matter where I go is this Hamilton watch .I just love it

  • @echardcore
    @echardcore 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I wear my Khaki daily even while working on my car. Its scuffed, scratched, and dinged. The accuracy is shocking. Barely +1 sec. per day over a month on the wrist!

  • @Quimmoo
    @Quimmoo ปีที่แล้ว

    SNK803K2 was my first ever automatic watch, i've bought in 2020 in a heart of the quarantine. I felt so overwhelmed with my apple watch, not only because i was constantly connected, but because battery started to drain out quickly and it was annoying af. I've tried a different smart watches before it, even the "analog" Withings watch, but it didn't scratch that itch for a something that is as far from computers as possible. So the watch that worked with a set of gears and springs was like a breath of a fresh air really. I've been wearing watches since i was a 9 y.o. and having something on my wrist is essential to me. I was sleeping, eating, working, and all the other things wearing that Seiko, it only been leaving my wrist in a shower and only because i've put a leather strap on it. Even tho it wasn't the watch that sparkled a passion and a desire to build a collection (it actually was another Seiko - CS Sports Chronograph 140th Anniversary edition) and even tho i'm not wearing it anymore (got used to bigger watches, not oversized, just bigger) i'm still thinking that SNK803K2 is a great all-around watch for cheap with a classic elegant look.
    Hamilton is mine newfound admiration. I was a full-on hardcore Casio fanboy before going with the Apple and Seiko, thinking that Swiss watchmaking is something completely out of reach for an ordinary man, rather a status accessory for a douchebags and rappers than a tool, but man, i was completely wrong. Hamilton intramatic chronograph is a grail watch to me, with a such profound history of creating the first automatic chrono, and outstanding vintage inspired looks. It's not THAT expensive, i can afford this watch without any problems, but i'm used to buy watches for occasions, so waiting for a right moment. And Khaki Field is even more value-packed watch. Classic looks, featuring in a pop-culture - interstelllar and far cry, no brainer tbh. Great videos, mate, i glad i've found your channel. Love your movie collection. I used to collect the movies with my dad, when i was a kid, VHS and DVDs) It's something about the ability to touch the art, which is otherwise fully verbal. Amazing.

  • @Joe-qr6ft
    @Joe-qr6ft 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love my Khaki Field but I just wish it had AR coating, better lume and a screw down crown!

    • @theurbangentry
      @theurbangentry  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree on the AR. I don't mind the crown as I love winding it, even if I don't need too 🤦‍♂️
      If you think the lume is bad on the Hammy, wait until you see the Seiko!!! 😂😂
      Thank you Joe,
      Best regards,
      TGV

  • @sportsracer5
    @sportsracer5 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've been enjoying my Hamilton KFM on a Wrist Candy Watch Club perlon (olive black melange, of course) for a couple months now. While it started out as a rather stiff strap, it quickly softened up after less than a week. It's now by far the most comfortable strap I own. It's a perfect match for the Hamilton.

    • @theurbangentry
      @theurbangentry  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cracking combo!!! I love it, thank you for sharing that Matt, deffo one of the most comfy, I totally agree.
      Best regards,
      TGV

  • @cameraz99
    @cameraz99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Under $500? I recently bought the Seiko at Kohl's for $170! You'll never get the Hamilton for anything near that.

  • @pauljohn4441
    @pauljohn4441 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As a Seiko fan, indeed the Hamilton looked a cut above the Seiko and I was about to consider trying one. But after checking the price, the Hammy was twice, more than the Seiko. Wasn't really an apples2apples comparison. This Hamilton was more on the price level of the Alpinist (at least here in Manila). So yes, am sticking to my original intention of getting this seiko 5.

  • @GuyVanderAa
    @GuyVanderAa 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love the Seiko but for me the win is for the Hamilton. The historical significance makes my heart beat faster.

    • @theurbangentry
      @theurbangentry  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I totally get that, well said, you really feel that connection with the Khaki collection.
      Thank you Guy,
      Best regards,
      TGV

    • @rodenwald
      @rodenwald 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is only the name. The brand is now owned by swatch group. Same with Ray Ban, now owned and produced by an italian company.

  • @azryazwan8708
    @azryazwan8708 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I absolutely love the intro of this video. The music & visuals kinda drawn me in, almost trying to pull me into the world of horology. Goosebumps

  • @samuellyon3511
    @samuellyon3511 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Seiko 5 👍

  • @jackthompson8377
    @jackthompson8377 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I own 3 Hamilton’s - field, dress, and gmt. All fantastic. I like to play up the field watch with a steel bracelet and play down the gmt with leather or natos. The change in appearance is startling.

  • @yuu0minae
    @yuu0minae 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really like Seiko’s design but over 13mm thick is a massive turn off when it comes to field watches.

    • @Bob_Smith19
      @Bob_Smith19 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There’s zero reason for it to have a domed crystal.

    • @khairulhelmihashim2510
      @khairulhelmihashim2510 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      it appeals to majority buyers who need a military looking, masculine sized sports watch.

  • @peterkull8354
    @peterkull8354 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Since 5 years I own a SS Hamilton handwinder Khaki and I love it. I already have an eye on the bronze version 😋😋😋

  • @MichaelandCathy1999
    @MichaelandCathy1999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yup, Seiko missed its shot again…Hamilton for the win 🥇

  • @BWo-bb1yw
    @BWo-bb1yw ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would pick the Seiko, both have the same information (on the dial) but the Seiko looks less crowded at a glance. I like the hands on the Seiko. The Hardlex has its place in the world of hard knocks as replacing a saphire crystal will require a service too and more than likely a dial change. The only down side to Seiko is its thickness. Im getting a watch like this to beat, it will save others up the food chain, food for thought.

  • @clemsonalum98
    @clemsonalum98 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Hammy all day, different league.

  • @mrc7966
    @mrc7966 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just picked up a Hamilton Khaki Mechanical today and then this review of the very similar Hamilton popped up. First Hamilton I've owned, always had Rolex or Omega's, had a few Seiko's too...very impressed with the quality of the Hamilton thus far!

  • @rbcroosendaal7381
    @rbcroosendaal7381 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    S5

  • @KapitanPisoar1
    @KapitanPisoar1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just got me the SPRG33 as my work watch. I do like the Hamiltons but I just don't have the hearth to spend money on something I will thrash around while working. As a matter of fact I do work on the railroad and had no idea about the Hamilton tie (pun intended :) to railroading. I might get me a mechanical pair somewhere down the road.

  • @Gromel
    @Gromel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If this Seiko only had a Sapphire crystal...it would be an Hamilton Khaki killer ! 😉

    • @ivanivanis9129
      @ivanivanis9129 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Looks to me that is already scratch on Seiko's hardlex crystal...thanks,but no thanks for hardlex

  • @LobsterRavioli
    @LobsterRavioli 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love the fact you took two watches at two different price points and was able to make a comparable choice for both!

  • @rickrounds5150
    @rickrounds5150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love your 'look back' to the history of these watches. Your video introduction is outstanding. Ciao for now.

  • @anthonystevens8683
    @anthonystevens8683 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A good review and an education TGV. I've had Seiko watches for many years now, generally they have all been functional and have done the job. My old series 5's were also great for the price, as long as you shook the movement enough to wind it and I could just about forgive some of the minor hand alignment errors as 'near enough' but all of the bracelets were left wanting. Hamilton slithered onto my radar a few years ago, I have 2 with one being the 'Murph' retro, that actually looks like an old watch and not just old style with modern gubbins giving the game away. Since then I find myself looking at more examples from Hamilton and less from Seiko. This review sums up the reasons why that you outline. The Khaki Field H70455533 is great for the price and really suites life on a leather band, modern, functional, readable and from my experience should be reliable.

  • @bigprocrastinator
    @bigprocrastinator 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video! I have both. Literally wore the strap off the Hammy and put a NATO on. Honestly, I should've got the 38. Big crown works great, but sometimes it snags on cuffs. Also, the movement needed servicing so the Seiko slotted in and I never looked back. Ended up buying a few more 5s on diff colors. Both watches dress up or down well - perfect for daily wear. Love Hamilton, but i think I'm going to only get hand wound Hammies from now on.