Just in time: why we keep running out of everything | It's Complicated

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ม.ค. 2022
  • The global supply chain seems to be in a perpetual state of crisis. Whether its groceries, petrol or micro-chips for electric vehicles, everything just keeps running out. But why does it keep happening?
    Subscribe to The Guardian on TH-cam ► bit.ly/subscribegdn
    The crux of the matter lies in the way our global supply chain works, and how companies have come to rely on a unique system of efficiency, dubbed 'just in time', which developed in Japan in the late 1960s and early 70s. Josh Toussaint-Strauss explores how the prevalence of just in time supply systems are contributing to a global supply chain crisis
    The Guardian publishes independent journalism, made possible by supporters. Contribute to The Guardian today ► bit.ly/3biVfwh
    Website ► www.theguardian.com
    Facebook ► / theguardian
    Twitter ► / guardian
    Instagram ► / guardian
    #supplychain #itscomplicated #economics

ความคิดเห็น • 93

  • @gaborkorthy8355
    @gaborkorthy8355 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    I was a manufacturing manager in the early 80's when "just in time" was the darling of all the top business schools. It was obvious to me than that all " just in time" manufacturing did was force the suppliers to hold the large manufactures inventory. It was never about efficiency of manufacturing but more about saving the cost of that inventory.

    • @lat1419
      @lat1419 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I worked as a consultant in retail and it was the same there. What went really wrong was outsourcing IT as the board was (a) captured by the consultancy (b) ignirant of how much value they got from internal IT which was far more central to the business than the donkeys realised. Following trends tends to be a way for consultancies to part compznies from a huge amount of money...twice as they are brought in to bring the service back in house

    • @jasonbaxter3658
      @jasonbaxter3658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The problem I have with just in time is that you are increasing risk. The inventory is like an investment to reduce risk, it should be seen as necessary insurance.

    • @miamisasquatch
      @miamisasquatch 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That's the American bastardization of lean

  • @shinygoldcar
    @shinygoldcar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    “Efficiency” is not the only benefit to manufacturers like Toyota, quality is also improved. If a component has been made incorrectly, and someone on the line notices, they can inform the person making the component and the issue is rectified almost immediately. In a “just in case” situation, that component could have been made months ago, meaning you have potentially months worth of defective components. Sure, if you are a retailer selling toilet paper, then Just in Time is really only for the cost benefit, but cost is not the only benefit in general.

  • @matthewbaynham6286
    @matthewbaynham6286 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Here in Germany we are not running out of anything. Whenever I go to the supermarket there isn't a single empty shelf.
    Perhaps the problems with "just in time" don't effect countries that haven't brexited.

    • @jacobstrube8118
      @jacobstrube8118 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I agree with the assumption. In Denmark there has not been any supply problems. I blive that UK has the same problem as other countries in Europe, but brexit massivly exacerbate the supply problems.

    • @sk00p
      @sk00p 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Here in the England, we are not running out of anything and have full shelfs, until news articles cause mass hysteria and people buy £60 of petrol.

    • @stevesheppardmusic
      @stevesheppardmusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sk00p but you are having great party's lol

    • @sir_s
      @sir_s 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sk00p you mean filling up?

    • @thingsnstuff85
      @thingsnstuff85 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s affecting America too. To be specific, near Denver, CO. We’ve been seeing it for awhile now

  • @jim4859
    @jim4859 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I think that retailers like running out of some items because it makes consumers want to "stock up" which means that consumers will carry at least part of the cost of storing excess inventory.

    • @stacyliddell5038
      @stacyliddell5038 ปีที่แล้ว

      Makes little sense if they can't match demand they are leaving money on the table and opening the door to a more efficient competitor.

  • @thhanh1003
    @thhanh1003 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Truth is without Brexit you probably would be having chicken AND toilet rolls, wouldn't that be wonderful? Us in the EU are still struggling to get micro-chips and construction products (such as timber) in time but we are appalled to see what the UK has been going through. In other words it's businesses that suffer more from the pandemic in the EU, we haven't had any shortages in grocery stores. High five brexiteers!

  • @margeert3952
    @margeert3952 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    For the UK, Brexit is one of the main reasons for disruption.. you’ll need a lot of ‘just in case’ inventory… think alone of 10 miles of HGV lorries, standing for 24 hours. That is a lot of money frozen.

  • @sharonhill2602
    @sharonhill2602 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I grew up in the country side in the 90’s you’d always have a back up. I still do that.

    • @lat1419
      @lat1419 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same here, rural and remote. We can be cut off because of weather, and are always the last to be restored. We have always kept a pantry, plus we grow veg and swap with friends for eggs, buy locally made cheese and bread. We dont mind paying £4 for a huge loaf of sourdough, which lasts most of a week and keeps a local business going.

  • @arnie1046
    @arnie1046 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It wasn't a toilet paper shortage it was a Braincell shortage.

  • @nicolomastronardi253
    @nicolomastronardi253 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The supply chain problem isn’t global as the author suggests but British (mainly). The EU block doesn’t have problems related to the supply chain, as much as in the UK.. Brexit?!

    • @sk00p
      @sk00p 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is no issues, I could literally go Lidls and get these items right now.

  • @Ralph-ny1ey
    @Ralph-ny1ey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So the bottom line answer, as it is to every "why" question in business, is money and profit. Save a buck here, there, worry about problems later.

  • @dont_listen_to_Albo
    @dont_listen_to_Albo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Toyota’s JIT system works because its suppliers’ factories are nearby, so could make multiple deliveries a day if required. JIT doesn’t work if lead times are three months.

  • @MrDavrush
    @MrDavrush 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Brexit! Brexit. What is it about Brexit you neither understand? Or acknowledge. The greatest self defeating act by any country. In our lifetime and your ignoring it!

  • @patchthesinclair5896
    @patchthesinclair5896 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you, I found that very informative!

  • @irminschembri1081
    @irminschembri1081 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Strange as little Malta hasn't run out of anything ! Surprised Pikachu face !
    Could it be that there was something something in 2016 in the UK ?????

    • @TooRiskyHD
      @TooRiskyHD 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What do you mean 2016 UK explain more if you can bro?

    • @irminschembri1081
      @irminschembri1081 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TooRiskyHD June 23rd 2016 referendum ???

    • @TooRiskyHD
      @TooRiskyHD 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@irminschembri1081 arr got you but this was going on before 2016 I think it’s just how the global supply chain works it’s outdated system

  • @markhoulder2971
    @markhoulder2971 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Lots of simplistic, or even simply false, information in this video. Toyota tends to be more resilient to supply chain shortages than many competitors because it can react faster to changes in demand, and has much better business intelligence for its supply chain.

    • @APG19912009
      @APG19912009 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s the thing, Toyota has reacted and amended to their plan. They had the foresight to plan ahead of “what if”. The overwhelming amount of companies and supply chains have no worked that in.
      Toyota thought of it, they probably also thought of “what if something goes wrong?” From what I’ve studied in economics in university days was “always have a back-up, have a contingency”

    • @TooRiskyHD
      @TooRiskyHD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you listened they legit said they used to do it quite a few companies still do it it’s just to keep profits running

  • @highstax_xylophones
    @highstax_xylophones 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Needs to be "just the needs"

  • @primalconvoy
    @primalconvoy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Ironically, Japan was one of the last (developed) countries to implement "just in time" practices in its shops and stores, etc. It wasn't until (7-11?) ,which was then still an American company (now, it's owned by the Japanese side, if I recall) introduced "POS" (point of sale), which basically is using barcode scanners to check stock and streamline inventory to a "just in time model", that Japanese shops came into line with other countries.

    • @tamaliaalisjahbana6849
      @tamaliaalisjahbana6849 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow interesting Why was it that Japan took longer?

    • @CGMB777
      @CGMB777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Smart if used as an official method of inventory.

    • @ianknight1132
      @ianknight1132 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Completely incorrect. Toyota (Japan) was the architect of just in time.

  • @Jason-un9ps
    @Jason-un9ps 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This sounds like a huge business opportunity. Get a large enough warehouse in a very impoverished city where you could store excess “just incase” inventory for multiple companies.
    Since you’re not selling products yourself, you don’t need to worry about being in an area with customers. You can be in a place where rent/purchasing a warehouse is relatively cheap, and you’d also be bringing jobs to that city so hopefully you could work out some kind of deal with the city where you’re eligible for tax breaks/cheaper power..etc

  • @forhinglandho-hoseven6545
    @forhinglandho-hoseven6545 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Because it has been DONE ON PURPOSE.

  • @MrTomtomtest
    @MrTomtomtest 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Haven't felt or seen a lack of anything personaly, from the EU, but yeah that's the problem with globalized supply chains in a more & more unstable world.

  • @englishworld7792
    @englishworld7792 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    JIT is marvelous technique...

  • @johndoe1909
    @johndoe1909 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    works well here in scandinavia.

  • @3dprintingguy346
    @3dprintingguy346 ปีที่แล้ว

    yes

  • @blindedbliss
    @blindedbliss 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Only Finland was prepared with a WW2 inspired emergency store of PPE, in a mooutain somewhere.

  • @pr5x
    @pr5x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A bit of a simplistic explanation..
    Jit is about reducing batch sizes to an ideal of 1..
    The emphasis is about improving processes and eliminating setup costs with flexible manufacturing, work centers and staff training.
    The nhs would greatly benefit from this.. It still operates as a 1970's manufacturer.. Think of patients as raw material and you get the idea.. Lots of big waiting rooms across hospitals and all offering just one service...
    Why am I writing this.. No one cares 🤣

    • @lat1419
      @lat1419 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh they've done it to the NHS. When did you last use it (I mean hefore 2020)? In my part of the UK we have a local hospital & A&E 25 minutes from home that has been down graded to a minor injuries (after a £25m refit) and some OPD. All childrens health is now centralised at the next hospital which is another hours drive down to road. Radiation therapy for cancer is at another hospital another further hours drive, meaning seriously ill patients are being driven by volunteer drivers 2hours+ each way for daily 20 minute treatments. This is utter madness.

    • @pr5x
      @pr5x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lat1419 that's actually bigger batches.. That's the nhs moving into the 1960's 😂

    • @lat1419
      @lat1419 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pr5x yes we didn't specify which century either.

    • @lat1419
      @lat1419 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pr5x but we are making progress, too slowly, but progress. If anything the H&her may have the Streisand effect. 😁

  • @tamaliaalisjahbana6849
    @tamaliaalisjahbana6849 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for explaining that. So that is why I have to wait 3 weeks for spare parts for my Toyota. I suppose for other products Brexit would add to the problem. Trucks waiting so long in queues, hours spent on paperwork and shortages of foreign workers to mention a few.

  • @andrewuk8363
    @andrewuk8363 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    In any case time is precious...

  • @paul329869
    @paul329869 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:52 I feel that the solution would be “just in crossover.”

  • @WINKEofficial
    @WINKEofficial 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    BREXIT!

  • @paulastro4439
    @paulastro4439 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not at my supermarket they aren’t

  • @biwihd9982
    @biwihd9982 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Top.

  • @ConradJabba
    @ConradJabba 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about truckers staying in Ottawa?

  • @saariftravel5492
    @saariftravel5492 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love you all ❤️ from Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩

  • @hd2000
    @hd2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Try and find baking parchment

  • @pictureoftara6227
    @pictureoftara6227 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Take Just you need mate.

  • @TomNook.
    @TomNook. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:33 there's a typo in the subtitles, it's inventories, not infantries 😂

    • @theGuardian
      @theGuardian  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for flagging, this has been fixed!

  • @DasGrosseFressen
    @DasGrosseFressen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh if we just had a Hilbert-Bellman-Jacobi equation...

  • @thomuk2006
    @thomuk2006 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Brexit :(

  • @mobinxd
    @mobinxd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:12 answer: wastage

  • @oneworld7500
    @oneworld7500 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Products are being made. The issue is poor leadership.

  • @pauljenkinson1452
    @pauljenkinson1452 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about a few messing around with supply chains due to unnecessary political polices. That is why people need their own parallel society with supply chains.

  • @GiGiLuvsKatz
    @GiGiLuvsKatz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Johnny was given justice! ALL REAL domestic violence victims were given a voice! Those who lie are exposed! Justice for Johnny!

  • @veterankarlos5723
    @veterankarlos5723 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Little secret here for you all when we say a product is in short supply it very rarely is we just say that so you very clever people buy it all and we make money 💰💰💰

    • @tamaliaalisjahbana6849
      @tamaliaalisjahbana6849 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is that legal in Britain? In my country it is not especially if it is a staple.

  • @ex0696
    @ex0696 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a BS. Open your eyes.

  • @ojsimps701
    @ojsimps701 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shoplifters?

  • @postdesign1034
    @postdesign1034 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imagine taking the guardian seriously.

  • @77kappamaki
    @77kappamaki 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In your map Taiwan is marked as part of China. Please be aware that we're an independent Country.

  • @danielwebb8402
    @danielwebb8402 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We can have "just in case". Just means lower standard of living in general. Easily 10%+ lower.

  • @SC-tl3px
    @SC-tl3px 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this video for kids? This voice over sounds like it is.

  • @trivialgravitas9581
    @trivialgravitas9581 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Because of lock-downs and restrictions, figure it out.

  • @Felix-rising
    @Felix-rising 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not sure who put this together but it’s largely nonsense. 3PL is just in time so goods are laid off close to the end user.

    • @saariftravel5492
      @saariftravel5492 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      👍💝🇧🇩

    • @georgplaz
      @georgplaz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you don't know who put it together? 5:05

    • @Felix-rising
      @Felix-rising 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@georgplaz was bored by then 😂😂

    • @BigHenFor
      @BigHenFor 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, it's nonsense right? Then why are global supply chains failing? 3PL is a subset of JIT, and the consumer only got a part of the benefit. Workers didn't, as the natural development was to offshore labour costs too. Hence the rise of the working-class poor in service industry jobs on minimum wage, and the decline in the proportion of GDP spent on labour costs over the last 4 decades in Developed countries.

  • @ryancapewell6504
    @ryancapewell6504 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stop blaming brexit

  • @michaelmyers3709
    @michaelmyers3709 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brexit

  • @MoritaJunichiro
    @MoritaJunichiro 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Toyota🤮100%

  • @Mini89632
    @Mini89632 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brexit