@@faigelsworld i agree. Thats a big reason why i wanted to read his books. So i could finally understand. Because school dont teach us the real causes of history.
Sadly, Hitler thought an industrialized Germany was unsustainable and needed far more farmland, which has proven to be untrue Poland WAS illegally occupying German land but he believed regaining lost land would be insufficient. The starvation in postwar Germany was likely an influence on him. Not giving Britain another excuse for war would have been far more intelligent, but Hitler was no genius.
We have the same attitude today concerning Lebensraum. The false assumption is that overpopulation gives the right to invade other countries. No it doesn't. It means overpopulated countries only have to decrease their population. Today it indicates that population rich countries have no right to solve their problem by letting their people migrate to developed countries.
Germany was late to the colonial game. Then, upon the Versailles Treaty, Hitler decided that playing catch-up with colonial acquisition was gone, and so he wrote that off, and turned to pan-Germanism in Europe per medium of a single German Reich. Hitler obviously preferred the Prussian version of things over the just recently invoked Poland. And he wrote off the Soviet Union as a sort of ghastly morass which was beyond redemption and so was fair game for wholesale conquest and resettlement. Hitler frequently enough mentioned the concept of ' sustenance ', seeing eastward agriculturalism as a means to negate any Western blockade or embargo, going forward.
@@jonglewongle3438 well summarized. What do you mean ”hitler obviously preferred the prussian verson of things over the just recently involed poland”??
@@TheHHPodcast What became Poland, as a consequence of both World Wars combined, in fact, was, say, about 90 to 95 % of the former Prussia. The West succeeded in essentially turning Prussia entirely into Poland. with the exception of Berlin itself plus some bit of territory thereabouts.
@@TheHHPodcast Hitler, not in these exact words, referred to the Soviet Union as a horror story with all Germanic upper leading strata having been negated in the former Imperial Russia and, I forgot to mention, Germany being the next great war objective of Bolshevism.
a few things this is making me think about: 1. market depending on buyers....isn't that basically all business? realistically the only way of avoiding that is to close a country off to international trade completely....God knows. 2. a lot of what he's talking about is happening.....everything he said in 18-20 min mark is basically the problem with capitalism, dependance of small countries heavily on other countries for stuff like cars, etc.....globalization in a nutshell. 3. 24:05 about the trouble with concentration of people in cities and the repercussions....so true 4. africa is more or less what he's talking about....people breed like rabbits. 0 advantage imo....proof: look at the state of those countries 5. I'm inclined to agree that disabled people cost more and contribute less....and idk, God forbid anything happen to me or anyone else....but me personally, I do believe that it's not worth living that life. 6. y'know, all things considered.....regardless of whether or not I agree or disagree, I don't think one world leader nowadays talks about or even thinks about any of what he talked about. he was going on about the super detailed logistics of all these problems....when was the last time you've heard a world leader talk about this stuff? all u see now is who can embezzle the largest amount to run off to ibiza and snort cocaine 7. the way u pronounce 2-syllable words is hilarious lmao
A different perspective here, recently disabled( 4 years ago),brain damaged, unable to provide for my family. Less productive, fewer things that I enjoy or can enjoy. But I do feel my life is worth living. Double vision, feel hung over and walk like a drunk( very embarrassing), difficulty counting or with simple math( before could do algebra in my head). I believe there is purpose for me, just waiting for an opportunity.
Basically, Hitler saw the future Germany as an incarnation of ancient Sparta with German colonists slaveowners and the sea of subhuman slavic barbarians around which German colonists would be free to kill at their will. Eventually on German held territory all Slavs had to die down. Hitler himself said that he saw only two races in future Europe: German - the masters, and Latin. Some may think that Hitler invented all this in his head from the scratch. But essentially this isn't right. Long before Hitler there arose in Germany the theory of so called Mitteleuropa - Mid Europe. This theory proclaimed all Eastern Europe the German sphere of domination. And furthermore it envisaged direct tearing away from Russia such territories as Baltic states, Byelorussia and Ukraine. Some added even Crimea and Caucasus to that. In those territories there had to appear states directly dependent on Germany. The rest of Russia may go to hell and in any case it'd become an agricultural appendage for Germany. So Hitler didn't invented a new direction of German expansion. His own personal contribution was that he replaced economic domination by direct invasion, enslavement and extermination. No more no less. By the way, the notion of "agricultural appendage" demands some explanation. Few know that in pre-Revolution Russia the bulk of industries were located either in Poland (which, by the way, absorbed the bulk of French credits to Czar's Russia but categorically denied any obligation to repay them) and in the Ukraine. So if you have Czar's Russia without Ukraine you essentially have purely agricultural country without heavy industry. Stalin not only widely industrialised Russia but he made another very important thing: he began shifting industries to the east - to the Urals and Siberia which turned out to be priceless during the war.
I'm sorry. We should have allied with you in WW2.... Just like he wanted... an alliance between two germanic peoples, the Anglo-Saxons, the ruler of the waves and quarter of the globe...and the germans, the lords of europe. 🇬🇧🇩🇪
Wtf you're delusional if you thought that Germany wanted a "partner" in ruling the world. You would've been subservient just like Italy became. This comment could've maybe and that's a big maybe in 1936 but after seeing what Hitler and the nazis did how can anyone say they should've been apart of that murderous megalomaniac. You really need to reexamine how you see the world or read more history.
Really? Do you think such a person as Hitler was willing to share the stage with the British empire? The man was a complete psychopath that would stop at nothing to get exactly what he wanted. Millions died because this man thought he was always right on how the world should be. This animal would have devoured the British empire at the drop of a hat. Thank god for Churchill. He alone could see that only force could stop this man from world domination.
If you want to support more documentaries of this kind please *subscribe*! 🙏🏼
The revelation of fully understanding the scope of the situation we call WW2 is very mentally freeing and eye opening
@@faigelsworld i agree. Thats a big reason why i wanted to read his books. So i could finally understand. Because school dont teach us the real causes of history.
Very well made documentary. Thank you. Sharing with friends
Definately. Very well put together
You know, just reading the 25 point plan opened my eyes. Stuff like this is just vindicating how I feel.
Sadly, Hitler thought an industrialized Germany was unsustainable and needed far more farmland, which has proven to be untrue Poland WAS illegally occupying German land but he believed regaining lost land would be insufficient. The starvation in postwar Germany was likely an influence on him. Not giving Britain another excuse for war would have been far more intelligent, but Hitler was no genius.
We have the same attitude today concerning Lebensraum. The false assumption is that overpopulation gives the right to invade other countries. No it doesn't. It means overpopulated countries only have to decrease their population. Today it indicates that population rich countries have no right to solve their problem by letting their people migrate to developed countries.
Thanks for your work
- top notch research, and presentation.
@@MarcPagan very appreciated. Thanks a million for this comment
Very good.... there is only one narrative recorded in the victors history books....
...and it is not the correct one !
Germany was late to the colonial game. Then, upon the Versailles Treaty, Hitler decided that playing catch-up with colonial acquisition was gone, and so he wrote that off, and turned to pan-Germanism in Europe per medium of a single German Reich. Hitler obviously preferred the Prussian version of things over the just recently invoked Poland. And he wrote off the Soviet Union as a sort of ghastly morass which was beyond redemption and so was fair game for wholesale conquest and resettlement. Hitler frequently enough mentioned the concept of ' sustenance ', seeing eastward agriculturalism as a means to negate any Western blockade or embargo, going forward.
@@jonglewongle3438 well summarized. What do you mean ”hitler obviously preferred the prussian verson of things over the just recently involed poland”??
@@jonglewongle3438 also what do you mean ”he wrote off the soviet union”?
@@TheHHPodcast What became Poland, as a consequence of both World Wars combined, in fact, was, say, about 90 to 95 % of the former Prussia. The West succeeded in essentially turning Prussia entirely into Poland. with the exception of Berlin itself plus some bit of territory thereabouts.
@@TheHHPodcast Hitler, not in these exact words, referred to the Soviet Union as a horror story with all Germanic upper leading strata having been negated in the former Imperial Russia and, I forgot to mention, Germany being the next great war objective of Bolshevism.
Agreed
1:53 The correct order is "Munich, Bavaria" not "Bavaria, Munich"
Americans say month/day/year. What's up with that?!?!
@@jonathanstempleton7864 ???
@@jonathanstempleton7864 You are American it's too difficult to understand that, Europien ming set
@@jonathanstempleton7864 Do they say California, Los Angeles!?!?
a few things this is making me think about:
1. market depending on buyers....isn't that basically all business? realistically the only way of avoiding that is to close a country off to international trade completely....God knows.
2. a lot of what he's talking about is happening.....everything he said in 18-20 min mark is basically the problem with capitalism, dependance of small countries heavily on other countries for stuff like cars, etc.....globalization in a nutshell.
3. 24:05 about the trouble with concentration of people in cities and the repercussions....so true
4. africa is more or less what he's talking about....people breed like rabbits. 0 advantage imo....proof: look at the state of those countries
5. I'm inclined to agree that disabled people cost more and contribute less....and idk, God forbid anything happen to me or anyone else....but me personally, I do believe that it's not worth living that life.
6. y'know, all things considered.....regardless of whether or not I agree or disagree, I don't think one world leader nowadays talks about or even thinks about any of what he talked about. he was going on about the super detailed logistics of all these problems....when was the last time you've heard a world leader talk about this stuff? all u see now is who can embezzle the largest amount to run off to ibiza and snort cocaine
7. the way u pronounce 2-syllable words is hilarious lmao
Agreed
@@samcaspers what exactly do u agree with? I brought up like 7 different points 😂
@@lover4391 Every single one
I agree, each point. Very informative and unbiased.
A different perspective here, recently disabled( 4 years ago),brain damaged, unable to provide for my family. Less productive, fewer things that I enjoy or can enjoy. But I do feel my life is worth living. Double vision, feel hung over and walk like a drunk( very embarrassing), difficulty counting or with simple math( before could do algebra in my head). I believe there is purpose for me, just waiting for an opportunity.
Basically, Hitler saw the future Germany as an incarnation of ancient Sparta with German colonists slaveowners and the sea of subhuman slavic barbarians around which German colonists would be free to kill at their will. Eventually on German held territory all Slavs had to die down. Hitler himself said that he saw only two races in future Europe: German - the masters, and Latin. Some may think that Hitler invented all this in his head from the scratch. But essentially this isn't right. Long before Hitler there arose in Germany the theory of so called Mitteleuropa - Mid Europe. This theory proclaimed all Eastern Europe the German sphere of domination. And furthermore it envisaged direct tearing away from Russia such territories as Baltic states, Byelorussia and Ukraine. Some added even Crimea and Caucasus to that. In those territories there had to appear states directly dependent on Germany. The rest of Russia may go to hell and in any case it'd become an agricultural appendage for Germany. So Hitler didn't invented a new direction of German expansion. His own personal contribution was that he replaced economic domination by direct invasion, enslavement and extermination. No more no less. By the way, the notion of "agricultural appendage" demands some explanation. Few know that in pre-Revolution Russia the bulk of industries were located either in Poland (which, by the way, absorbed the bulk of French credits to Czar's Russia but categorically denied any obligation to repay them) and in the Ukraine. So if you have Czar's Russia without Ukraine you essentially have purely agricultural country without heavy industry. Stalin not only widely industrialised Russia but he made another very important thing: he began shifting industries to the east - to the Urals and Siberia which turned out to be priceless during the war.
My nation is my race!😊
Looks like HESS had a hand in writing Hitler book.
There is a lot we don't know and I wonder as many do what the world would look today had Germany, Japan and USA allied?
I'm sorry. We should have allied with you in WW2.... Just like he wanted... an alliance between two germanic peoples, the Anglo-Saxons, the ruler of the waves and quarter of the globe...and the germans, the lords of europe. 🇬🇧🇩🇪
Wtf you're delusional if you thought that Germany wanted a "partner" in ruling the world. You would've been subservient just like Italy became. This comment could've maybe and that's a big maybe in 1936 but after seeing what Hitler and the nazis did how can anyone say they should've been apart of that murderous megalomaniac. You really need to reexamine how you see the world or read more history.
Really? Do you think such a person as Hitler was willing to share the stage with the British empire? The man was a complete psychopath that would stop at nothing to get exactly what he wanted. Millions died because this man thought he was always right on how the world should be. This animal would have devoured the British empire at the drop of a hat. Thank god for Churchill. He alone could see that only force could stop this man from world domination.
Always remember what this mad man said....and what he did... 👎👎👎
@@magnussigurdsson9045 more on this in the next video..