I've had my Luminox USAF 3400 for 17 years. I wore it everyday through military service, and for years after. It's still ticking without any issues whatsoever. I've swam with it, went through SERE school, and even a water survival class in Pensacola with it. It does have a screw down crown, AR sapphire, and steel case though. The tritium is still better than any other lume I have for reading all night.
@@jaex9617 Just look at Sorrel boots since Columbia has bought them... I would not buy a new Luminox, as they seem to be drastically reduced quality in the last 15 years or so. I called to ask about getting new end links for the PVD bracelet I have for it, and they still wanted $200 for a bracelet with hollow end links and a stamped clasp...
I gave a Luminox Navy Seals as a present to my girl 12 years ago, the case is stainless steel, it has a screwdown crown, sapphire crystal, good trithium lume ... when I looked last year for a similar watch - no chance - only plastic ones. I myself wear a Steinhart Ocean One on a jubilee bracelet and an Orient Kamasu (well it's red 😎) on a Bond Nato, both cool watches 🐠
When I was in the Navy (many years ago), the 3051's were standard issue to the teams. They were very well made during the time and few out there were better. You had your G-shock fans, and some even wore Timex's, but Luminox was THE brand to have back then. I wore mine every day and only replaced the band because the rubber had deteriorated. I have a newer 3051 made in about 2015 which does not have ANY of the issues you mentioned. It is a tough watch. Went snorkeling, diving, and SCUBA with it and never had an issue. There is an inner rubber seal at the crown so when it is pushed down, no water gets in there. The tritium glow is still as bright as the day I bought it. The only thing even close to comparable regarding lume, in this price range is a Seiko SRP777, or Victorinox Airboss. Higher end, maybe an Omega Seamaster. The Tritium is designed for NO LIGHT, not low light. Why? Because it's nuclear. Mine glows all night in a dark room. No charging needed. EVERY night. Try that with another watch in this price range and within 20 minutes, their lume is non-existent. Is it a toy? Absolutely NOT. This watch is NOT a "kids watch." No disrespect to the OP pooping all over 'Nox, but this watch is bad-ass. Contrary to the OP's opinion video, just because it is lightweight, doesn't mean it's cheap. Many watches are lightweight and cheaply made. This is NOT one of them. Besides, is a Titanium Omega Seamaster cheap because it's light weight? Rhetorical question, as we all KNOW it isn't cheap. Lightweight, sure....but does that make it a "toy?" Absolutely not. Additionally, the Luminox is a Swiss movement, so right off the bat, that makes it more accurate than about 75% of the junk on the market today. This is a terrific watch, and gets a lot of attention whenever I wear mine.
i have a 3051 given me by a student on the teams and its still ticks beautifully i did replace the rubber band with a steel clasp one and its been great! its my daily and i have no complaints... maybe its just me but stainless case screw down crown does everything i want and nothing i dont
Both my sons are Military, both wear G Shocks day to day. All their buddy's wear G Shocks day to day. This watch is as tactical and useful as my lazy brother-in-law.
An inexpensive alternative is the Casio MRW-200, it only costs 20 USD. 100M water resistance, rotating bezel, 43mm and a very strong material, I highly recommend it.
I'm a professional diver and have had many many Dive watches over my 30 years of diving. For me, my Luminox is definitely a tool. It does have a screw in crown, sapphire crystal and plenty of lum on deep low viz dives. I like the bezel because it is easy to use it with thick dive gloves - I actually use the bezel as back up to my dive computer - I'm old school. It is light, comfortable and reliable. Definitely a Tool for me!
I am agree with you! Luminox is very durable and reliable. Cosidering this reviewer comment inthis clip--- the watch cannot make him feel like the tool. I wonder did he ever really use the watch for diving?
@@kitsunemuraadmin7267His watch does seem kind of chintzy though, with it's back fastening down with four little screws. The back on my Luminox 3025 Coronado is a screw-in type with 6 detents on the back for a watch wrench, and is gasketed.
During my enlistment in the Marine Corps I served with Force Recon. Most of us preferred Marathon watches. When I went on embassy duty, I usually wore my Hamilton because it looked better with my dress uniform. These days, I think G-Shock is the go to brand. As for the Luminox, I totally agree with you.
I have had mine for years and have worn it throughout my whole service in the army and have never had a single problem with it, keeps accurate time and the tritium is still bright have tried out many g shock and seiko watches and have always came back to my luminox I just liked the fact that in the field holding a rifle I could tell the time when it was dark without needing to hit any button for a back light or some shity glowing letter that need to be charged from the some and an hour after the sun sets can’t even read it
I´ve had several Mudmaster G-Shocks, GWG 1000, GG 1000 and GG B100. The lume was a piece of shit. Really bright in the sun. After 2 or 3 minutes i couldn´t see shit.
I HAVE a Casio that totally looks like a Luminox. The bezel is cheap, BUT it has day/date and is dead on accurate. AND you can buy them all day on eBay for $20.00 new in a box!!!
I’ve worn my luminox everyday for 7 deployments on a submarine. I absolutely love it. Yes there are other options. My only issue with it was the band has broken twice in 4 years.
Definitely. Love my automatics first and foremost, but any true watch enthusiast wants a few various types of quartz watches for more function, durability, casual style, all for a reasonable price! My SS Bertucci Ventara 11083 rocks style/value with time as accurate as my iPhone for $70 w/ 100m WR. The G-Shock DW5600 and Casio “Royale” speak for themselves!!!
Alexandre I have to tell you that it is not possible, go to the official website and they say that you can't press the buttons underwater or while the watch is wet
I'm a former tool. Its been two years since I bought a luminox watch and with the help of people such as yourselves, I'll never buy another. Just horrible 😞
I did that lol , bought one luminox and it leaked ,, soooooo i sent it in and they sent me a second one aaaannnndddd it leaked too (both colormark watches) 🤬 💩 Got a Reactor Gryphon and 3 years later it has never had a problem.
I love them I gave one as a gift and the person loved the look and comfort and quality After that I bought 2 so far Navy seal and comando green bezel I recommend both Mr mr on the video pls you have the knowledge on watches and it’s about appeal quality design Come on some people don’t like automatic watches and Luminox have the automatic line they have sapphire Crystal line ! Luminox is different is style plus and great conception watches
I prefer the Trasers, made by Microtec the people who make the the actual tritium tubes. They have no pretense of military spec just light weight rugged watches.
A little over a year ago, this would've been my "grail watch", when I first got bitten by the watch collecting bug. When I tried it on, it felt so light and "high end" (I was clearly caught up in the moment). I'm so thankful to people like you who've taught me so much about quality watches. I finally saved up the dough for a good watch and invested it into a Seiko PADI Turtle, best decision ever. I would've regretted buying a Luminox. There are way too many reviews of these watches with the same negatives you've pointed out. There's also a bunch of buyers who've complained about the tritium tubes fading away into nothingness merely a couple of years after purchase. And heck, you can't all be wrong. And yea, that "lightness" when I first wore it? It did feel cheap, now that I think of it 😄
...but it wasn't cheap. You get what you pay for. Swiss > Japanese...any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Turtles are great watches...but not nearly as accurate or reliable as a Swiss movement. Unless, of course it's a Japanese quartz and a Grand Seiko...which it's not. It's just a 4R36. Although the 4R36 is a terrific movement, it doesnt hold a candle to a Swiss quartz in terms of accuracy.
@@peteygnyc Agreed, but it's subjective, I guess. At this price point, I'd take the 4R36 any day over a similarly priced Swiss quartz and even if my preference was for a Swiss quartz, there are a lot of better alternatives, from Tissot, for example. And if the "Swiss" part wasn't a priority, there are a ton of quartz offerings from the likes of Seiko, Orient and Citizen with comparable accuracy to their Swiss counterparts. It all comes down to what you're looking for in a watch, at the end of the day. I'd already had a few G-Shocks before I'd picked up the Turtle to scratch the quartz itch. So for me, the Turtle was the way to go.
I have 3 Luminox, all 3 bought used over 15 years ago, and all 3 still have good visibility at night. They have better visibility than any non-tritium watch I've ever owned including a lot of the Seiko famous divers. My 2 Navy Seals watches came to me already all beat up and well worn. I continue to wear them as beaters because they are already beyond being pretty. Most watch enthusiasts won't wear their beater watches where they might get dirty or beat up, but since mine are already beat up I don't baby them or protect them. Both run reliably and serve the tool function because I wear one or the other of them every night so I can see the time at any time of night. Granted I don't take mine diving but I do wear them when doing things like washing the car. All 3 of my Luminox watches continue to run well. So yes as far as I'm concerned they are definitely legitimate tool watches. And I also agree that they are overpriced for a quartz watch. Since I bought mine well used they were very low priced.
I have a titanium luminox with a screw down crown. I think all their metal watches have screw down crowns but not the plastic ones. I also love the tritium lights, always on and no need to push any buttons.
Kinda strange they don’t all wear the same watches. You’d think just in case they had to “synchronize” watches on some operation that there would be pre-requirement that they all had to wear the same proven extremely accurate, durable, and probably waterproof timepiece.
Buy a Marathon quartz, you can get some for 200$ with the hardened plastic case the tritium tubes is why I wear it every single night as the most consistent easy to read in the dark. It’s so light and pretty thin, on a good quality nato, it’s a perfect easy to read beater.
Bought a Luminox 3050/3950 about 15 years ago. Love it. Fits great on my wrist (42mm) with the rubber wrist strap ( Endmill) after market, and keeps fantastic time! Love the outstanding lume! Very happy.
I have a Luminox 3100 on right now. It has a screwdown steel crown. The case is steel. I've had it since 2004 and just replaced the battery for the fifth time. It doesn't feel plastic. It feels steel. I agree that the bezel feels cheap. That is my only gripe but I'm willing to live with it. At night I don't have to press any button to see it. The lume is still clear at night after 14 years. Btw I got mine for $240 in 2004.
I've been a diver since 1987 and served in the Navy for 20 years as an aircrewman. Recently, I was l looking for a replacement for my personal dive watch, a Citizen Aqualand. I was replacing it not because I lost it or of failure, but because I have it for close to 20 years and recently had the batteries replaced by a local jeweler that would not ensure that he pressure tested it. Rather than risk a possible leak, I decided to replace it. I went with the Luminox 4221 ANU, and could not have been happier with my decision. Currently I have 10 dives with it, with a max depth of 80'. The stainless steel case measures 45mm making it a "larger watch", but with my 7 3/4" I don't have a problem with it. The 23mm rubber strap distributes the weight nicely and secures it regardless of diving with a wet suit or on the skin. I do not have any issues with the 4221 ANU's crown or bezel as this is a stainless steel watch. I get T3's gripes about the 25th edition of the "Navy Seal" watch... but if you're going buy a "diver", buy a diver and not commemorative edition. The original Navy Seal 3001 currently on Amazon for $350, and I have seen it for as low as $268.00. Yes, it has the double security gasket (vice screw down), and a polyurethane case. I will put it to T3 and everyone else this way; "Don't take anything in ocean you're not willing part with." Just my 2¢.
Imhad a Luminox F16 that I wore daily for a decade. I also did a ton of diving with it during that time. They don’t glow at all??? I don’t know what you’re looking at. No, they don’t glow like Seiko’s Lumibrite, but they don’t need charged before night use. I won’t get tritium tubes again unless they are t100 (the brightest tritium tubes). The F16 also jas a stainless case and bracelet, so it feels much more substantial than the plastic cased Luminox models. The mineral crystal really is a drag. I scratched mine in the first couple of weeks of wear. Finally, I flipped it when I started getting interested in automatic divers. But, I would never consider my Luminox F16 a toy. It was a serious daily wearer and dive watch for me. I have good memories associated with it.
You are very straightforward, I was considering a Luminox but after watching this vid, not any more. In 10 min you covered the whole matte. Thnaks, Sal from Honduras
Oh man, if you want a heavy stainless steel watch... just buy one! Know what?! High performance sports cars are often made of fibre reinforced polyamides which look and feel like cheap plastic BUT is a high performance material. Lightweight is not a bug. It is a feature!
I had an operations manager. He loved his Luminox. And at the time I loved my Seiko Sea Urchin. I had never owned or handled one and asked if I could take a look at it. What sold me was the tritium lume. Tbf. It looked good. But everything else you mentioned felt off. Cheaper and not great for the price. I let him hold my Urchin and he scoffed at how it only had 100m Water resist and felt the automatic movment was a gimmicky. I was a little hurt but overall really felt like I got my money out of my $130 Seiko instead of a $350 Luminox.
TheCaptain008 an Urchin will last much longer than a Luminox. Not a screwdown crown, but I had one briefly, I wore it in the shower, baths, the Atlantic, the UKs North Sea and it didn’t miss a beat, looked like a Tudor Pelagos, too, classy. If you can spend a few pounds/ dollars more, the SKX feels a touch more robust.
@@itsallrobbish - I definitely should have saved up for an SKX. My Sea Urchin was my 3rd watch ever. I think if I ever get an SKX I'll pick up a used one and learn to mod more than just a crystal swap.
I own several and you are absolutely right! I’ve taken mine on several deployments and they are not mil spec! Let alone the glow absolutely zero 24hr glow
I used to wear a 3150 at work as an ER nurse. Eventually switched over to a g-shock 5610 and have been very happy with the switch. The 3150 was just a bit too thick under my scrub jacket.
I have the 3001 Blackout...it fell on the floor once...glass destroyed! Then seconds hands are not aligned with painted notches...it was really a delusion. I think I'll never buy anothet Luminox in my life. In relation to quality, it should cost at most 50 bucks...
My Luminox F-117 has a threaded crown and it has one of the best tritium glowing hands on any watch I’ve owned. Maybe they’ve changed over time ? I really love mine.
From what I saw with the Luminox, I would prefer a G-Shock, or a Timex Shock type watch for the money invested. For durability and taking punishment the G-Shock watches have been the best for me. I tend to buy the G-Shock watches in the $400 to $600 range. The G-Shock and Timex watches I have are very accurate keeping within about +-4 to +-6 seconds per month.
Tend to agree. But I wouldn’t say it’s toy. L’x are not as super tough as G-SHOCK probably, but they have couple of tactical features which are handy. For me, they are super light, and most likely biggest benefit is that Tritium tubes. These are lighting in shadows and night beautifully. Besides of my bigger G-SHOCK collection, I have 2x Luminox watches: Luminox NAVY SEAL 3500 Series - XS.3517 Luminox BLACK OPS 8880 Series XL.8881. The BLACK OPS has Sapphire Crystal, so this could be little bit better than the regular Navy seals. Both are lighting just fine. I wear them sometimes. Another one I am interested in is Series XS.3603, which has also Sapphire Crystal. Anyway, if I go to war, and can take only 1 watch, I take G-SHOCK with me 😀 (Tough Solar + Multi Band 6) That’s for sure.
Great comment. This was a click bait video. I wore a Timex Ironman with the orange buttons when I was on jump status. Loved hitting indiglo as soon as I popped off my riser. If I could have afforded a Luminox I would have left it at home. Not trying to get my Lumi dirty lol
well I wear one for close to 15 years and it never let me down.still solid as day one. maybe the bezel is a bit stiff. beat the shit out of it. paid 100$ for it. just my 2 cents
I was gifted a Luminox 1594 back in 2001. It has a steel case and bezel as well as a screw down crown. Minus a battery replacement or two, and a clasp repair, that watch is still functioning great. When new, the lume was sufficiently bright that you needed to cover it up when in a movie theater or when going to sleep. Now, when I happen to open my watch box in the mornings and don't turn the lights on, it is still glowing cheerfully, brighter than its more modern lume neighbors. This doesn't invalidate your thoughts on Luminox at all, this was just an excuse for me to share my good experience with a watch my parents gave me a long time ago that I still enjoy and get good service from to this day. Thanks for the great videos.
I came across this brand a few months ago when i was searching for an everyday watch for myself. I wanted a black housing watch and they had a bunch so that initially interested me and the designs were decent. However, the more I looked into them the lesser quality they seemed to be and when i realized they had basically plastic housing, I was done haha. Grabbed myself a hamilton khaki field watch (the new black housing and grey band) and couldn't be happier 👍
I just retired from the Navy last November. I can tell you the go to watch is the G-Shock. I never wore one because I'm not a fan of plastic or digital watches. However, Boatswain mates and Deck department, who due some of the dirtiest and arduous jobs a ship wear them and swear by them. The about of shocks they get from activities like needle gunning should be a certification for any "tough watch"
I've had mine for probably 15, and I agree. And my Luminox Navy Seal does indeed have a threaded crown as well. Maybe the newer ones aren't as well made or he got a cheaper model, but my watch is very durable and I enjoy it very much.
I have an older Luminox with a sapphire crystal, stainless steel case back, screw down crown and it’s 15 years old going strong. It no longer glows though.
Mine is also 15 yeas old and still going strong. Still glows even although it may be a little dimmer. I think they are over priced but other than that I like mine
FYI, if you still love the watch, you can still replace the tubes. With a bit of cost, of course. Had mine replaced... Felt 'new' & fell in love with it again. Atacama Field Day Date 1921
I was about to get a Luminox before I watched this video, I was debating between luminox and G-shock ( which I always use and love), now no doubt where am I going to right!!!.. That’s why I love TH-cam.
I own 2 luminox watches, I bought them at steep discount at a TJ Maxx because of how cool the tritium lume is. Mine work fine in the dark but the half life of Tritium is 11 years or so. I sleep with one on the wrist because they are so light and comfortable. Definitely more toy than tool but i know a patrol man who wore one on duty for years and while it looks chewed up it still runs.
the best alternative i can think of is an entry level Citizen diver. they basically cost the same as an SKX but they have better automatic movements and decent quartz eco-drive options.
Just acquired a Navy Seal 3600 at a bargain price of £179 as opposed to list price of £535 as I’ve always wanted to try one! This is an impressive watch, with threaded crown, stainless screw down back & sapphire lens. Although lighter than a steel case it feels weighty and high quality. The carbonox case feels extremely durable and this watch definitely feels like a £500 watch. Whilst not the brightest ever, the lume from the tritium tubes is great, once your eyes have adjusted to the dark and it doesn’t need any light to activate it, being a huge bonus! Obviously Luminox produce many different watches and I think the reviewer here has picked the wrong watch to review, giving an unfairly negative view of the brand. He’d have come to a totally different conclusion had he reviewed the watch I’ve just bought (and I’m VERY fussy about quality) There are plenty of very positive reviews of Luminox watches out there but I guess a the end of the day we all have different opinions and I agree that the watch reviewed here doesn’t appear particularly special.
Luminox is a copy of the mil-w-46374f type 6. i.e. Traser P6500 Type 6, or Stocker & Yale SandY P650 Type 6. Stocker & Yale and Traser both no longer make them (Stocker & Yale being out of production for quite some time). You can still find the Traser P6500s (as well as the upgraded models), or look to KHS watches for newly produced ones.
Castle Doctrine I’m glad I scrolled through the comments, I was just about to say the same thing! I have a Traser P6500 which to all extents & purposes is a reissue of the SandY P650 as both were produced by mb-microtec ag Switzerland. The first Luminoxes were a US market copy of the P650. Initial runs were possibly done on contract by mb-microtec but there is no connection with Traser/mb-microtec now (apart from Luminox buying tritium vials). I think Luminox suffered when they went for crap quality & designs and full on marketing - there’s only a couple that could be said to be any good now, & they’re all far too expensive. Here’s some details from a Milspec Navigator watch comparison that has the P650 history & mentions Luminox in passing (pics gone through ‘linkrot’ long ago unfortunately just google the model No’s) forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.php?6371-American-Navigators-Marathon-G-and-Traser-H3-P6500
In the army I wore a luminox or a gshock or pathfinder depending on my mood and mission. Most seals I know/knew wore sins or sea dwellers. Seals have a long history with Rolex and get a great deal on them direct from Rolex to the teams where they are “permanently issued” to the teams.
They haven't permanantly issued Rolex's to the teams since the 1980's, my dude. Actually, it was issued during 1962-1983. In 1983, they switched to Omega Sea-dwelers and were quickly replaced in 1988 with Luminox. In 1996, the US Navy no longer issued watches to the teams.
I have the BlackOps 8881; basically the Navy Seal but with a sapphire crystal. I don't know how long you've had yours but the tritium on mine can light up a dark room. I paid $325, which is about $100 more than the Navy Seal but the sapphire crystal was worth it to me. The 'Navy Seal' or 'Black Ops' licensing doesn't mean anything to me as I think most special forces are using G-shocks. I bought mine because I think it looks really good, I love the tritium and I believe it's a very tough watch.
@Jesus Christ Thanks Jesus. Means a lot to me that you have been duped as well. G Shocks and Seiko. Please don't let Satan place these others in our path
Luminox = Underwheming I’ve had the 8802 for about 10 years. Early in my watch journey it got a LOT of wrist time. Have the resin bracelet and it’s really good. Original strap rotted and had to replace it, but nearly 10 years is acceptable. Probably put 2 batteries in it. The tritium tubes on mine are still strong & bright, but has to be in very low light. Yes, I agree; case & crown do feel very flimsy. It’s an ok watch, but not a great value for the dollars you spend. Really appreciate this review and it is spot on. Great job, Jory! 🍺
MagicThighs great watches, I’ve had three of them, I just give them away when I get bored with them, they don’t break. Lume is rubbish and there is no warning when battery runs out, otherwise the best analogue bargain watch out there......ultra accurate, too!
Currently there are no standard issue Navy Seal watches.They are worn by preference and individually owned.Most wear Casio DW6600,but aside from Luminox, they also wear Timex,Tudor,Rolex,Seiko Diver,and Suunto
I bought the Luminox Sentry and love it. I wasn't expecting it to be anywhere near as durable as a G-Shock. It's got regular lume on the 12,2,4,6,8 and 10 but the hands and the 1,3,5,7,9 and 11 are the gas tubes and in a dark room I can see them from 15 feet. No matter the condition I have never not been able to tell the time. It was one my most worn watches until I got my GD-350. I've worn a G-Shock since 1986 and you just can't beat them in durability.
Hi: I like the Luminox. Light watch that is easy to wear and comes in cool colors. I was on a quest for a tough quartz tool watch with a classic set up of hands and a clock dial and not a digital display. I like reading the time that way. My top three (money not an issue): 1. Marathon Quartz Diver. Awesome tank but a bit too chunky. Love it though. I had the JSAR. 2. Seiko Quartz Tuna. Yeah, the one you have is great. Love the hands and the rugged, industrial style. Easy to read. Whip ass build quality. Weird shape on my wrist though. 3. Sinn UX. Oh, man. I am so biased. This one is special. And expensive. I have had all three and stuck with the Sinn. The UX, just like the other two, can do it all with me: drums, moto, hockey, wrenching, etc. Thanks for the vid, kid! --Michael
Alexandre Yeah, I have owned a few. I had the three Master of G watches. I liked them all but they were just too big. I also tend to not like the straps on Casio watches. I just can't get a comfortable fit when really using them in very active situations. Maybe if they refined the strap materials. I don't want to get the aftermarket j&k adapters for NATO straps. I'll keep my eyes open though! --Michael
I have a Luminox 3025 Coronado Black/Yellow that I bought new in July 2018 and it was almost perfect, losing only 4 seconds/month. I set it *_TO THE SECOND_* on the 1st of every month. It has bright glowing tritium tubes which I love because they are extremely easy to see at night, and they don't fade over a few seconds to a minute like the luminous painted watch hands do. The back is a screw-in type with six detents for inserting a watch wrench. The back is gasketed. The crown is not a screw in type, but it rotates with nice resistance, like it's rotating against a seal, and it has a decent click out and then similarly clicks back in. It's been a great watch. Then on July 5th, 2023, it started exhibiting the battery needing replaced behavior of the second-hand stopping for 4 seconds and then advancing ahead 4 seconds all at once. So, it was still keeping correct time. Five years on the same battery isn't bad. I took the watch to King's Jewelers to get the battery replaced. After the tech. replaced the battery, it wouldn't start running again. It was running when I walked into Kings, but not when I walked out. 🤷♂️. I don't know if there's *_some trick_* to getting the watch running after you replace the battery. I tried getting it running again with the old battery, putting the gold keeper arm across the top of the battery and carefully screwing down the back with just finger pressure, but I couldn't get it running again, at all. Maybe it has to be tapped lightly on the side to get it off of top dead center (if you catch my drift), I don't know. I wish I'd taken the back off myself, so I could be *_100% sure_* of what battery was in it *_from Luminox,_* because the tech. replaced the battery out of my sight in the back of the store and therefore I'm not sure if she gave me the correct, old OEM battery back back. I mean she might have mixed it up with other batteries that she might have had laying around in her work area when she replaced it. 🤷♂️ There is only one way to put the battery in the watch, + side up, so it's not like you can get that wrong. The battery she gave me back is a ⤵️. SR927 + muRata Hg O% Japan Nothing in the owner's manual says what type of battery it takes. So, I guess I'm going to send my Luminox 3025 Coronado in to Luminox battery replacement and checking it out.
I have a stainless steel 3502 navy seal my dad gave me from the 90’s about ten years back. The crown is threaded and feels very sturdy, it also clicks well. The bezel movement feels good. Tritium is a bit faded, but the watch is around 30 years old so I suppose that’s to be expected. It’s sapphire as well. I believe when he bought it it was the same price as this one.I guess they don’t make ‘em like they used to. If you can find an older one, I highly recommend it!
I should also mention that he wore it everyday for 20 years while working as a paramedic and I’ve worn it the majority of 10 years. This watch has definitely taken a beating but it’s still looking great and going strong.
Agree... you want an inexpensive watch that is tough! I bought an armitron watch before I went to ranger school. That was in the late 80’s. Still got it and it still works. That has to say something.
Yep, I heard about the Navy Seal association and thought it was cool, but I’d read about them steaming up, when used in the sea etc. Forces personnel will use G shocks in theatre most of the time, they’ll take a beating and from only £45 or so. I have a 1984 DW5200 and it still looks immaculate and it’s been to two conflicts, at least. If folk want to go down a mechanical route and have a timepiece that’ll last and look good in Mess dress, then something like a Seiko SKX007 would be a good choice. Rolex lookalikes can be a good choice if made well. I’ve been keeping an eye on Enoksen watches, lately, they look great! Great video BTW.
You want my opinion, well you pretty much nailed it on your video, A fucking toy. Ive busted the band 4 times, my bezzel popped off somewhere on a jobsite, the crown loosened up and i dont know how which allowed moisture into the watch (which is pretty much a death sentance for any watch) and the kicker is its less then 3 months old. took it back during a band breakage time and asked if i could get a reeeeeefund, and the place i bought it at wasnt an authorized "fixer/repairer of luminox cept for stupid shit like bands or batteries. So I took it to an authorized dealer/repair shop and they tell me it aint under warranty no more and had to fork out almost $300.00 to get my $550.00 damn near, brand new P.O.S. toy watch fixed. BTW I STILL HAVNT GOTTEN IT BACK AND ITS BEEN 8 WEEKS! And the Navy Seals would want their name on this junk watch??? Maybe the Seals arnt as tuff and hardcore anymore. just sayin?
SEALS don’t issue this or use it. Luminox uses the SEAL designator because they sent some to the Teams for T&E back in the day and the OIC gave it a favorable review. If you wonder if it’s a real piece of kit, ask Luminox what the NSN is for their flagship SEAL watch. They don’t know what an NSN is. The watches that get issues are G-Shock, Suunto X-Lander, and wayyyyyy back in the day Submariners. Also check out Resco. Their watch is the only watch that’s gone through every phase of SEAL training. Great and honest review. Happy to see someone speak truth about Luminox making cosplay kit.
I have had one for 10 years with no complaints. Wear it in a manufacturing environment and the case has been bulletproof - crystal not so much. Tritium still bright. No issues with water resistance or the crown. Paid about half of what you did brand new.
I have the 2017 Luminox 821 800 Ultimate Field Watch (currently discountinued)and it's a pip. Steel case and simple steel bezel. Xtra-thick Sapphire, 200m, Tritium that works (it does have a 12 yr half-life so it doesn't last forever), screw-down crown, 23 jewel ETA 241 Chrono movement. Top-quality leather strap. They've upped their game in recent years..on some models anyway.
Have to agree. I enjoy my Luminox 3051 but the only reason I have one is the retailer I work for had it available and I get a 40% discount. I got my 3051 for about 180.00. I wear it on the thick velcro Luminox strap and it is ridiculously comfortable. For an additional 30 bucks, I installed a sapphire crystal. So, it's pretty sturdy now. I have had it in the shower but that's the extent of the water exposure. I wouldn't trust this in the pool with the flimsy crown. Also, having popped the mineral crystal out, it doesn't sit super tight in the case like a stainless dive watch press-in crystal. My tritium works fantastic but only in total darkness.
Finally someone actually reviewing the Luminox brand. I've always been a g shock fan when it comes to toughness, but when I heard of luminox, I couldn't find much user information about them besides there own marketing. Thank you for clearing this up.
Don´t buy everything that he said. Luminox watches are good. Most people and i mean a LOT of people that complaint about Luminox bought fakes. The tritium tubes work for many years, water doesn´t get inside and it feals cheap because it´s so light due to the carbon case. Carbon is way stronger than metal and its magnetic resistant.
After owning several Luminox quartz and then really getting into watches, I settled on Armourlite watches for daily "hard use". They have decent tritium, can be had as autos, and won't break my heart if I destroy one and have to throw it away. As a guy who has routinely gotten my hands dirty (and bloody), I have two automatic AL watches as "beater" watches. I now own a couple CrhWard autos, a Junghans MaxBill, a 1960's E. Borel, etc. But when I'm going to the field or putting out a house fire, I typically wear one of my AL autos. They are a good compromise of having a reliable auto that is fairly durable, but won’t break the bank or the heart.
I have a 3003 evo navy seal, and it’s fantastic. It’s got a screw down crown and very positive bezel action. The Ronda 515 is a decent movement and the battery lasts 45 months (reportedly, I’ve only had mine for a week so far). It is what it is and I went into it with tempered expectations. I do t understand the hate.
I like them because they are lightweight and comfortable to wear. I also like to be able to read the time when it’s dark. But I agree, more of a toy watch. I have 3. The original has been perfect since day 1, almost 15 years. Another one needed to have the movement replaced and my 3rd Luminox needs to have the crystal cleaned or replaced. It’s gotten a little fogged/dull from the inside/underneath
I have been agonizing the last two months on purchasing a Luminox Navy SEAL watch for no other reason other than I like the style, but watching videos like this really put me off the asking price for the two models I like, both around £400. I've just purchased a Pulsar PM3129X1 for less than £60, looks so much like the watch I had issued whilst serving in the British Army, and its such a sturdy and heavy watch along with a great look, so comparing that to a Luminox, I think I'll wait until I have spare cash to throw away and then purchase a Luminox. Thanks for the honest review.
I wanted a luminox in the worst way but I was a bit skeptical due to the many reviews of shotty craftsmanship. It sounds like they have a bit of a quality control issue. Instead of a Luminox, I went with a KHS Dark Commander Pro II. This thing is the real deal. You should look into getting one and doing a review.
*If you watch Vigilant Elite (retired Navy SEAL/CIA contractor turned TH-camr)- you'll know that its common practice to wear a Rolex Submariner. Its 200m, tough, reliable, and also, you can pawn it anywhere in the world and have yourself enough money to escape out the country...* There you go....the "Navy SEAL" watch.
I got a good deal on a SS case 3202 or something. It was ok in 2004. Still works after cracking the sapphire crystal and flooding it the shower after surfing. Got it fixed up and gave it to my 13 year old who thinks its cool. Lum is shot, but that’s expected. Heavy on marketing for sure. I had friends in the teams and they always gave me a hard time about it. Seiko SKX these days.
Sounds like a professional review with quite serious arguments. I purchased a Luminox 3051 BO (before watching this vid !) to practice kayak as an alternative to wearing my Rolex Deepsea for fear of damaging it. We’ll see how it behaves, but I basically agree with the cons : non screw able bezel, not a sapphire glas, it also seems battery life decreases a lot after initial battery replacement on Luminox. Perhaps a G shock would have been a better choice…Thank you !
I have 2 getting repaired for the 3rd time!! They last around 2 years if you use it every day and are always out. Also good luck getting it fixed! If you’re in US you have to send it in to the official repair in RI. I Am looking into a G-Shock..
I have the blackout Navy Seal chronograph. Got mine used for about 100 bucks, changed out the strap for a 23mm NATO strap; the mineral glass was already scratched so I changed it for a sapphire. The tritium tubes are still glowing, and when they wear out, I will try to remove and glue new ones. Of course I've got some watch repair tools, and this sort of dorking around with the watch is not for everybody. but I'm very satisfied with my Luminox as a backpacking watch: very light. However I would not have paid full retail price for it.
Most of them are basically cheaper made analog G-shocks that wear smaller on the wrist. My first one was probably the best in their lineup: the 4221. This was the only one I believe that was actually deemed “Authorized for Navy Use”. It had a threaded crown, full steel black DLC case and case back, 60 click rotating bezel, and the tritium tubes were not bad. the problem was that it was chunky and it wore very large. After losing a few pounds, it’s extremely heavy on my 6.5 inch wrist. The original 3000 Navy seal series was the only other one I knew of that possessed a threaded crown. Usually if it was a steel case with a 200m WR rating, it had a threaded crown. Outside of that, not likely.
I have a luminox five watch; it has a screw in crown, sapphire glass, and is stainless steel. It has a 200 meter water rating which I can’t attest to though I can attest to about 110 feet. Some are good, some are cheap, just like anything else; know what you’re buying. With tritium just like night sights it fades over time. You should get 3-5 bright years with 10-15 years of usability but definitely a noted degradation. The watch gas an advantage as you can check time one gander regardless of light condition. I will say I also have worn G-Shock and Timex. A watch is a tool and while mist all will tell time some do it under more circumstances or more effectively then others. As a LEO that works at night the luminox and S&W tritium watch, similar but only $100, work best as you don’t need a second hand to turn on a light/illumination.
About time someone called out "Luminox". There is not a big difference between this and the cheapest Casio analogue for $20-$25. "Luminox" must spend a fortune on the "Mil-Spec" photos/videos for their website and I am really surprised they haven't been told to take the Seal Insignia" off those watches. If there was "Stolen Valour" for marketing??? Ok for a 10/12 year old son or daughter who was sports/active but G-shock would be my first go to. When Jory said $550 I think my neighbours heard me choke on my breakfast.
I've owned a 3001.BO since 2013. I have mixed feelings about this watch. Contrary to the reviewer, I find the lume on this watch to be incredible in the dark - I never seen anything comparable. The other big positive is the comfort - this is the most comfortable watch I've ever owned, and the most comfortable to wear while sleeping. On the flip side, it hasn't been terribly durable. In 2017 the movement stopped working, and needed to be replaced at a cost of C$185 (incl labour). The strap had to be replaced in 2019 for about C$85. The plastic bezel has a gouge in it at the 12 OC marker. The mineral crystal has quite a number of scratches, and some bad chipping/disintegration along the edge in one spot. The watch has recently stopped, and I worry that it's the movement again. The deterioration and repairs needed by this watch is shocking for a ~C$500 Swiss watch marketed as suitable for the most extreme conditions, considering that watch sees mainly evening/morning use prior to swapping out for a different watch during the day. I've owned several Citizens in a similar price range also with mineral crystals, but worn under tougher conditions, that are showing far less wear on the crystal (although the paint on the bezels are a different story). All that said, the comfort of this watch is so good that I am considering an alternative "Carbonox" Luminox as a replacement, perhaps an 8880 series or a 3500 series. BTW, I have a G-shock GA-700UC ana-digi as a beater watch - I'm sure it's very durable, but it's a horribly designed watch that's unusable in low light conditions. I will be looking at more expensive ones as a replacement to the Lumi, I hope they are better designed....
I've had my Luminox 3059 Navy Seal for several years. I have no military service, though I wear it on many hiking, fishing, kayak, canoe, camping trips...it's taken a beating and still functions perfectly. The tritium has not faded and though it doesn't seen very bright under gloomy conditions, it really shines in actual darkness after other lume has faded. Though maybe after another decade it might fade as the OP's has. I will say I'm more willing to abuse my G-Shocks..but that's because I like them less.
There are several complaints with Luminox. I love my 3583 chronograph, but its flawed and Ive read many reports of Luminox owners having the same issues. Some light fogging under the crystal with certain weather conditions and the second hand stopping just short of the 12 o clock position when resetting the chrono. Ive also read Luminox no longer offers tritium replacement services at its one service center in the US, which is a major buzzkill.
I'm not even waiting for the end of this video to give my comment. Luminox sucks. I've been in law enforcement for 35 years and one of my first work watches was a luminox (can't remember the model) damn thing fogged up when I looked at water and it went through batteries yearly. Over the years I've seen numerous rookie cops get a "high speed" luminox only to have it crap out within 12 months (or less) of acquiring it. My 1983 Seiko quartz diver still runs my luminox from 1999 is in pieces in some dark bin under my work bench.
I agree 100% with you. We had a luminox specially make us a watch with our kaw enforcement logo. Cost me $265, it last me little over 2 years of daily wear. It cost me $165 to have it fix. Not worth the money. Now I wear a Shock. Again I agree Luminox Is A TOY.
I was close to falling for the Luminox marketing when I was purchasing a new duty watch. I’ve had great luck with dive watches as my duty watches and never had an issue with them. I ran into an associate running a Luminox. He wasn’t impressed and cracked two crystals when hitting it against the ground. Super glad I didn’t waste money on one of these.
I own a Luminox with stainless steel case and no saphire christal. I’ve had it since 2004. It works without any flaws. Needs battery replacement every 4 years. Tritium tubes still glow in the dark and runs perfectly accurate for almost 20 years now. I also own a few g-shocks gwg-2000 and gmwb-5000mb and they need sync with atomic clock to be accurate. Otherwise they shift roughly 2 seconds per week. Luminox on the other hand runs perfectly accurate for four years until the battery needs to be replaced. I’m an airline pilot and i wear it almost every day. I swimm with it, ride my bike, take it to the woods… It has a few scratches, I’ve knocked it into the walls and doors but the watches are intended to be worn. Every scratch has a unike stroy and that’s the beauty of wearing a watch. And to tell time, of course 😂 I’ve been thinking of buying another one
Actually, these days, G-Shocks. When I was in the Navy, primarily, it was Luminox. I have a friend on the teams and he swears by it. Why? No buttons to push or backlight to read the time in the middle of the night.
If you want the look, get a Casio MRW200H, looks similar to a Luminox for $20. I've had excellent service from every Casio I've owned - they are incredibly durable.
I work in the world to know what watches these guys use. They use what they want. Of course they are issued Pathfinder/Garmin Tactix/Suuntos on occasions, they use what they want. That goes for all SOF military. This is all strictly marketing. Never seen a frogman with a Luminox on. Never seen many commandos with an analog watch also. Especially on the battlefield.
I've had my Luminox USAF 3400 for 17 years. I wore it everyday through military service, and for years after. It's still ticking without any issues whatsoever. I've swam with it, went through SERE school, and even a water survival class in Pensacola with it. It does have a screw down crown, AR sapphire, and steel case though. The tritium is still better than any other lume I have for reading all night.
@@jaex9617 Just look at Sorrel boots since Columbia has bought them... I would not buy a new Luminox, as they seem to be drastically reduced quality in the last 15 years or so. I called to ask about getting new end links for the PVD bracelet I have for it, and they still wanted $200 for a bracelet with hollow end links and a stamped clasp...
@@jaex9617 It's somehow even shittier than just buying the competition and closing them down.
I gave a Luminox Navy Seals as a present to my girl 12 years ago, the case is stainless steel, it has a screwdown crown, sapphire crystal, good trithium lume ... when I looked last year for a similar watch - no chance - only plastic ones. I myself wear a Steinhart Ocean One on a jubilee bracelet and an Orient Kamasu (well it's red 😎) on a Bond Nato, both cool watches 🐠
How much r they bud I'm grant from Durham England 🏴
@@fontainenick Most people say otherwise. That Luminox watches years ago were not so great and they improved in quality over the years.
When I was in the Navy (many years ago), the 3051's were standard issue to the teams. They were very well made during the time and few out there were better. You had your G-shock fans, and some even wore Timex's, but Luminox was THE brand to have back then. I wore mine every day and only replaced the band because the rubber had deteriorated. I have a newer 3051 made in about 2015 which does not have ANY of the issues you mentioned. It is a tough watch. Went snorkeling, diving, and SCUBA with it and never had an issue. There is an inner rubber seal at the crown so when it is pushed down, no water gets in there. The tritium glow is still as bright as the day I bought it. The only thing even close to comparable regarding lume, in this price range is a Seiko SRP777, or Victorinox Airboss. Higher end, maybe an Omega Seamaster. The Tritium is designed for NO LIGHT, not low light. Why? Because it's nuclear. Mine glows all night in a dark room. No charging needed. EVERY night. Try that with another watch in this price range and within 20 minutes, their lume is non-existent. Is it a toy? Absolutely NOT. This watch is NOT a "kids watch." No disrespect to the OP pooping all over 'Nox, but this watch is bad-ass. Contrary to the OP's opinion video, just because it is lightweight, doesn't mean it's cheap. Many watches are lightweight and cheaply made. This is NOT one of them. Besides, is a Titanium Omega Seamaster cheap because it's light weight? Rhetorical question, as we all KNOW it isn't cheap. Lightweight, sure....but does that make it a "toy?" Absolutely not. Additionally, the Luminox is a Swiss movement, so right off the bat, that makes it more accurate than about 75% of the junk on the market today. This is a terrific watch, and gets a lot of attention whenever I wear mine.
i have a 3051 given me by a student on the teams and its still ticks beautifully i did replace the rubber band with a steel clasp one and its been great! its my daily and i have no complaints... maybe its just me but stainless case screw down crown does everything i want and nothing i dont
As a Swiss - Thank you for sharing your experience! :-) The swiss movement (even if it's just Quarz) is pretty nice though...
Back then? They were wearing Rolex Submariners in the SEALs (90’s). The Luminox is total garbage.
It's a movement ronda 9 From €12 made in China
Both my sons are Military, both wear G Shocks day to day. All their buddy's wear G Shocks day to day.
This watch is as tactical and useful as my lazy brother-in-law.
I'd like to think that MTG and mrg are better since there steel or titanium, but obviously not really practical when you're out on a mission
My army service watch was also a G-shock, I would never change it. And 15 years later it still works.
You know, as well as I, that what military personnel wear has mostly to do with cost 99% of the time.
do you own one?
@@Joeyczhu analog frogman or digital frogman would probably be the best for a seal due to ISO certification and the ability to use under water.
An inexpensive alternative is the Casio MRW-200, it only costs 20 USD. 100M water resistance, rotating bezel, 43mm and a very strong material, I highly recommend it.
Can you fit different bands on that Casio?
thank you!! I really like this one and I never heard about....crazy, just 20$!!!
I'm a professional diver and have had many many Dive watches over my 30 years of diving. For me, my Luminox is definitely a tool. It does have a screw in crown, sapphire crystal and plenty of lum on deep low viz dives. I like the bezel because it is easy to use it with thick dive gloves - I actually use the bezel as back up to my dive computer - I'm old school. It is light, comfortable and reliable. Definitely a Tool for me!
John Rand I use the 3051 navy seal for diving, never had a problem, a great tool easy to read, easy to use
I am agree with you! Luminox is very durable and reliable. Cosidering this reviewer comment inthis clip--- the watch cannot make him feel like the tool. I wonder did he ever really use the watch for diving?
@@kitsunemuraadmin7267His watch does seem kind of chintzy though, with it's back fastening down with four little screws. The back on my Luminox 3025 Coronado is a screw-in type with 6 detents on the back for a watch wrench, and is gasketed.
@@spzrrome too, its a great tool for diving
During my enlistment in the Marine Corps I served with Force Recon. Most of us preferred Marathon watches. When I went on embassy duty, I usually wore my Hamilton because it looked better with my dress uniform. These days, I think G-Shock is the go to brand. As for the Luminox, I totally agree with you.
Yup, me, too. Marathon are far better, a bit more money but worth getting repaired. G-Shocks are great but they are disposable, after all.
@@mcalax5901 Who are you talking to?
@Greg Alonzo. I was also an MSG. I stood post in both Poland and the Czech Republic. Semper Fi
@@jasonkeith1725, what watch did you wear while on post?
@@gregalonzo747, in the field I wore a Bertucci. While on embassy duty I wore my Glycine GMT.
I have had mine for years and have worn it throughout my whole service in the army and have never had a single problem with it, keeps accurate time and the tritium is still bright have tried out many g shock and seiko watches and have always came back to my luminox I just liked the fact that in the field holding a rifle I could tell the time when it was dark without needing to hit any button for a back light or some shity glowing letter that need to be charged from the some and an hour after the sun sets can’t even read it
I´ve had several Mudmaster G-Shocks, GWG 1000, GG 1000 and GG B100. The lume was a piece of shit. Really bright in the sun. After 2 or 3 minutes i couldn´t see shit.
Thanks God, finally someone is telling the truth about Luminox. I feel like some casio watches is much better than Luminox and much cheaper.
You at least get a day-date on the Casio's Luminox lookalikes.
I HAVE a Casio that totally looks like a Luminox. The bezel is cheap, BUT it has day/date and is dead on accurate. AND you can buy them all day on eBay for $20.00 new in a box!!!
@@bobklumpp8698 Lol True !!!!
I’ve had three Luminox’s. The only thing great they offer is the tritium in the lume.
@@appalachiangunman9589 yeah bro.
I’ve worn my luminox everyday for 7 deployments on a submarine. I absolutely love it. Yes there are other options. My only issue with it was the band has broken twice in 4 years.
rubber band or bracelet?
Rubber one breaks all the time.
Happends to mine as well
I went through a few rubber bands from them. Switched to a NATO and its been solid ever since.
i thought tritium was banned for submariners?
Gotta say, I like the increased focus on quartz watches.
I was thinking the exact same thing.... I like it
Definitely. Love my automatics first and foremost, but any true watch enthusiast wants a few various types of quartz watches for more function, durability, casual style, all for a reasonable price! My SS Bertucci Ventara 11083 rocks style/value with time as accurate as my iPhone for $70 w/ 100m WR. The G-Shock DW5600 and Casio “Royale” speak for themselves!!!
I second that!
@@Holt333 And accuracy .
@@Holt333 And accuracy .
Even the cheapest g-shock would be better than the luminox for a tool watch
yeah mate, can’t beat the base model 5600 for $40 USD
Even some regular Casio watch would better this watch
How do you start your chronograph underwater while scuba diving on a G shock ?
santiago pizarro g shock buttons can be pushed underwater
Alexandre I have to tell you that it is not possible, go to the official website and they say that you can't press the buttons underwater or while the watch is wet
The tool is the one buying this watch
jesus christ
I'm a former tool. Its been two years since I bought a luminox watch and with the help of people such as yourselves, I'll never buy another. Just horrible 😞
@@williamfarley8434 Glad you found the light, brother.
@@XavierAncarno thank you!
I did that lol , bought one luminox and it leaked ,, soooooo i sent it in and they sent me a second one aaaannnndddd it leaked too (both colormark watches) 🤬 💩
Got a Reactor Gryphon and 3 years later it has never had a problem.
I love them
I gave one as a gift and the person loved the look and comfort and quality
After that I bought 2 so far
Navy seal and comando green bezel I recommend both
Mr mr on the video pls you have the knowledge on watches and it’s about appeal quality design
Come on some people don’t like automatic watches and Luminox have the automatic line they have sapphire Crystal line !
Luminox is different is style plus and great conception watches
I bought one about 10 years ago spent 140.00 and love it and yes the tritium works perfect
Excellent choice.
Bought mine and even though I have others, I love this one also!
I prefer the Trasers, made by Microtec the people who make the the actual tritium tubes. They have no pretense of military spec just light weight rugged watches.
I second that!
Milspec = Mall-spec.
For the guy with the Jeep rubicon on 37 inch tires and 20 inch rims and harbor freight winch.
Win!
Milspec = it works but just barely for you and 200 other people before we even think about replacing it
A little over a year ago, this would've been my "grail watch", when I first got bitten by the watch collecting bug. When I tried it on, it felt so light and "high end" (I was clearly caught up in the moment). I'm so thankful to people like you who've taught me so much about quality watches. I finally saved up the dough for a good watch and invested it into a Seiko PADI Turtle, best decision ever. I would've regretted buying a Luminox. There are way too many reviews of these watches with the same negatives you've pointed out. There's also a bunch of buyers who've complained about the tritium tubes fading away into nothingness merely a couple of years after purchase. And heck, you can't all be wrong. And yea, that "lightness" when I first wore it? It did feel cheap, now that I think of it 😄
...but it wasn't cheap. You get what you pay for. Swiss > Japanese...any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Turtles are great watches...but not nearly as accurate or reliable as a Swiss movement. Unless, of course it's a Japanese quartz and a Grand Seiko...which it's not. It's just a 4R36. Although the 4R36 is a terrific movement, it doesnt hold a candle to a Swiss quartz in terms of accuracy.
@@peteygnyc Agreed, but it's subjective, I guess. At this price point, I'd take the 4R36 any day over a similarly priced Swiss quartz and even if my preference was for a Swiss quartz, there are a lot of better alternatives, from Tissot, for example. And if the "Swiss" part wasn't a priority, there are a ton of quartz offerings from the likes of Seiko, Orient and Citizen with comparable accuracy to their Swiss counterparts. It all comes down to what you're looking for in a watch, at the end of the day. I'd already had a few G-Shocks before I'd picked up the Turtle to scratch the quartz itch. So for me, the Turtle was the way to go.
I have 3 Luminox, all 3 bought used over 15 years ago, and all 3 still have good visibility at night. They have better visibility than any non-tritium watch I've ever owned including a lot of the Seiko famous divers. My 2 Navy Seals watches came to me already all beat up and well worn. I continue to wear them as beaters because they are already beyond being pretty. Most watch enthusiasts won't wear their beater watches where they might get dirty or beat up, but since mine are already beat up I don't baby them or protect them. Both run reliably and serve the tool function because I wear one or the other of them every night so I can see the time at any time of night. Granted I don't take mine diving but I do wear them when doing things like washing the car. All 3 of my Luminox watches continue to run well. So yes as far as I'm concerned they are definitely legitimate tool watches. And I also agree that they are overpriced for a quartz watch. Since I bought mine well used they were very low priced.
I have a titanium luminox with a screw down crown. I think all their metal watches have screw down crowns but not the plastic ones. I also love the tritium lights, always on and no need to push any buttons.
I think the SEALS might actually use G-Shocks
I'm sure they do.
the "SEALS" don't all use the same watch. They wear a variety of things, based upon their individual interests desires, just like regular people.
RP Jake Damm,the G-Shock king is enormous in size.I was thinking maybe a DW-9052 or DW-5600E.
Either Gs or Timex digitals
Kinda strange they don’t all wear the same watches. You’d think just in case they had to “synchronize” watches on some operation that there would be pre-requirement that they all had to wear the same proven extremely accurate, durable, and probably waterproof timepiece.
Buy a Marathon quartz, you can get some for 200$ with the hardened plastic case the tritium tubes is why I wear it every single night as the most consistent easy to read in the dark. It’s so light and pretty thin, on a good quality nato, it’s a perfect easy to read beater.
Bought a Luminox 3050/3950 about 15 years ago. Love it. Fits great on my wrist (42mm) with the rubber wrist strap ( Endmill) after market, and keeps fantastic time! Love the outstanding lume! Very happy.
I have a Luminox 3100 on right now. It has a screwdown steel crown. The case is steel. I've had it since 2004 and just replaced the battery for the fifth time. It doesn't feel plastic. It feels steel. I agree that the bezel feels cheap. That is my only gripe but I'm willing to live with it. At night I don't have to press any button to see it. The lume is still clear at night after 14 years. Btw I got mine for $240 in 2004.
Same watch here. Also screw down caseback, not 4 corner screws.
I've been a diver since 1987 and served in the Navy for 20 years as an aircrewman. Recently, I was l looking for a replacement for my personal dive watch, a Citizen Aqualand. I was replacing it not because I lost it or of failure, but because I have it for close to 20 years and recently had the batteries replaced by a local jeweler that would not ensure that he pressure tested it. Rather than risk a possible leak, I decided to replace it. I went with the Luminox 4221 ANU, and could not have been happier with my decision. Currently I have 10 dives with it, with a max depth of 80'. The stainless steel case measures 45mm making it a "larger watch", but with my 7 3/4" I don't have a problem with it. The 23mm rubber strap distributes the weight nicely and secures it regardless of diving with a wet suit or on the skin. I do not have any issues with the 4221 ANU's crown or bezel as this is a stainless steel watch.
I get T3's gripes about the 25th edition of the "Navy Seal" watch... but if you're going buy a "diver", buy a diver and not commemorative edition. The original Navy Seal 3001 currently on Amazon for $350, and I have seen it for as low as $268.00. Yes, it has the double security gasket (vice screw down), and a polyurethane case. I will put it to T3 and everyone else this way; "Don't take anything in ocean you're not willing part with."
Just my 2¢.
Imhad a Luminox F16 that I wore daily for a decade. I also did a ton of diving with it during that time. They don’t glow at all??? I don’t know what you’re looking at. No, they don’t glow like Seiko’s Lumibrite, but they don’t need charged before night use. I won’t get tritium tubes again unless they are t100 (the brightest tritium tubes). The F16 also jas a stainless case and bracelet, so it feels much more substantial than the plastic cased Luminox models. The mineral crystal really is a drag. I scratched mine in the first couple of weeks of wear. Finally, I flipped it when I started getting interested in automatic divers. But, I would never consider my Luminox F16 a toy. It was a serious daily wearer and dive watch for me. I have good memories associated with it.
You obviously did not get any money from Luminox for this review, just like you do with Seiko, Citizen and all the others.
My grandmother brought me one from Switzerland as a kid, I frigging loved it. Reminds me of my childhood. I'll buy another one someday.
$30 for the watch, $470 for the navy seal name?
A Casio MRW200 is about $20. Maybe $10 for the ratcheting bezel?
I paid $150 for mine NEW!
@@Alias_Anybody wait which one
You are very straightforward, I was considering a Luminox but after watching this vid, not any more. In 10 min you covered the whole matte. Thnaks, Sal from Honduras
Oh man, if you want a heavy stainless steel watch... just buy one! Know what?! High performance sports cars are often made of fibre reinforced polyamides which look and feel like cheap plastic BUT is a high performance material. Lightweight is not a bug. It is a feature!
I had an operations manager. He loved his Luminox. And at the time I loved my Seiko Sea Urchin. I had never owned or handled one and asked if I could take a look at it. What sold me was the tritium lume. Tbf. It looked good. But everything else you mentioned felt off. Cheaper and not great for the price. I let him hold my Urchin and he scoffed at how it only had 100m Water resist and felt the automatic movment was a gimmicky. I was a little hurt but overall really felt like I got my money out of my $130 Seiko instead of a $350 Luminox.
TheCaptain008 an Urchin will last much longer than a Luminox. Not a screwdown crown, but I had one briefly, I wore it in the shower, baths, the Atlantic, the UKs North Sea and it didn’t miss a beat, looked like a Tudor Pelagos, too, classy. If you can spend a few pounds/ dollars more, the SKX feels a touch more robust.
@@itsallrobbish - I definitely should have saved up for an SKX. My Sea Urchin was my 3rd watch ever. I think if I ever get an SKX I'll pick up a used one and learn to mod more than just a crystal swap.
I own several and you are absolutely right! I’ve taken mine on several deployments and they are not mil spec! Let alone the glow absolutely zero 24hr glow
"Mil-Spec" always means "bare minimum for grunts". It's a whole another thing when you name your model "The Navy SEAL"...
I used to wear a 3150 at work as an ER nurse. Eventually switched over to a g-shock 5610 and have been very happy with the switch. The 3150 was just a bit too thick under my scrub jacket.
Mike Wenger GW5610, all the watch the world needs!
I have the 3001 Blackout...it fell on the floor once...glass destroyed! Then seconds hands are not aligned with painted notches...it was really a delusion. I think I'll never buy anothet Luminox in my life. In relation to quality, it should cost at most 50 bucks...
My Luminox F-117 has a threaded crown and it has one of the best tritium glowing hands on any watch I’ve owned. Maybe they’ve changed over time ? I really love mine.
hey may i know what movement does it use? im planning to buy 1 now. that tritium is so big hahaha..
@@ganbatte1260 it’s a quartz movement, don’t know which one ?
From what I saw with the Luminox, I would prefer a G-Shock, or a Timex Shock type watch for the money invested. For durability and taking punishment the G-Shock watches have been the best for me. I tend to buy the G-Shock watches in the $400 to $600 range. The G-Shock and Timex watches I have are very accurate keeping within about +-4 to +-6 seconds per month.
My Luminox 3051 is accurate to about 12-18 seconds a YEAR.
Tend to agree. But I wouldn’t say it’s toy. L’x are not as super tough as G-SHOCK probably, but they have couple of tactical features which are handy. For me, they are super light, and most likely biggest benefit is that Tritium tubes. These are lighting in shadows and night beautifully.
Besides of my bigger G-SHOCK collection, I have 2x Luminox watches:
Luminox NAVY SEAL 3500 Series - XS.3517
Luminox BLACK OPS 8880 Series XL.8881. The BLACK OPS has Sapphire Crystal, so this could be little bit better than the regular Navy seals. Both are lighting just fine. I wear them sometimes.
Another one I am interested in is Series XS.3603, which has also Sapphire Crystal.
Anyway, if I go to war, and can take only 1 watch,
I take G-SHOCK with me 😀 (Tough Solar + Multi Band 6)
That’s for sure.
Great comment. This was a click bait video. I wore a Timex Ironman with the orange buttons when I was on jump status. Loved hitting indiglo as soon as I popped off my riser. If I could have afforded a Luminox I would have left it at home. Not trying to get my Lumi dirty lol
well I wear one for close to 15 years and it never let me down.still solid as day one. maybe the bezel is a bit stiff. beat the shit out of it. paid 100$ for it. just my 2 cents
I was gifted a Luminox 1594 back in 2001. It has a steel case and bezel as well as a screw down crown. Minus a battery replacement or two, and a clasp repair, that watch is still functioning great. When new, the lume was sufficiently bright that you needed to cover it up when in a movie theater or when going to sleep. Now, when I happen to open my watch box in the mornings and don't turn the lights on, it is still glowing cheerfully, brighter than its more modern lume neighbors. This doesn't invalidate your thoughts on Luminox at all, this was just an excuse for me to share my good experience with a watch my parents gave me a long time ago that I still enjoy and get good service from to this day. Thanks for the great videos.
I came across this brand a few months ago when i was searching for an everyday watch for myself. I wanted a black housing watch and they had a bunch so that initially interested me and the designs were decent. However, the more I looked into them the lesser quality they seemed to be and when i realized they had basically plastic housing, I was done haha. Grabbed myself a hamilton khaki field watch (the new black housing and grey band) and couldn't be happier 👍
I just retired from the Navy last November. I can tell you the go to watch is the G-Shock. I never wore one because I'm not a fan of plastic or digital watches. However, Boatswain mates and Deck department, who due some of the dirtiest and arduous jobs a ship wear them and swear by them. The about of shocks they get from activities like needle gunning should be a certification for any "tough watch"
what is needle gunning?
@@JinKee it's a pneumatic tool used to remove paint and rust off of metal surfaces. It's has a lot of vibration and impact.
@@seanthomxx2694 ah sounds like an endless job on a ship exposed to saltwater
@@JinKee it is.
I’ve had two for more than 20 years they keep great time and still glow
I've had mine for about the same time. Light on the wrist, never had a problem with it, and the lume is outstanding!
Most people that complaint about Luminox bought fakes on Ebay and Amazon.
I've had mine for probably 15, and I agree. And my Luminox Navy Seal does indeed have a threaded crown as well. Maybe the newer ones aren't as well made or he got a cheaper model, but my watch is very durable and I enjoy it very much.
I’ve had mine for 15 years and it is still going strong. I like it.
My recommended retail price for this watch is $15.95+gst aud
I have an older Luminox with a sapphire crystal, stainless steel case back, screw down crown and it’s 15 years old going strong. It no longer glows though.
Mine is also 15 yeas old and still going strong. Still glows even although it may be a little dimmer. I think they are over priced but other than that I like mine
FYI, if you still love the watch, you can still replace the tubes. With a bit of cost, of course. Had mine replaced... Felt 'new' & fell in love with it again. Atacama Field Day Date 1921
I was about to get a Luminox before I watched this video, I was debating between luminox and G-shock ( which I always use and love), now no doubt where am I going to right!!!.. That’s why I love TH-cam.
Luminox is the DW of tool watches. The only thing they have to recommended themselves is the tritium tubes.
That lume is awesome!
Dude. Just buy a Casio mrw200-h for around $18. It even looks better.
Exactly.
There is a youtuber who is a certified diver that loves the casio mrw200. He says it's because he's not scared of it getting dinged up.
You are fucking dumb
hahaha
I own 2 luminox watches, I bought them at steep discount at a TJ Maxx because of how cool the tritium lume is. Mine work fine in the dark but the half life of Tritium is 11 years or so. I sleep with one on the wrist because they are so light and comfortable. Definitely more toy than tool but i know a patrol man who wore one on duty for years and while it looks chewed up it still runs.
the best alternative i can think of is an entry level Citizen diver. they basically cost the same as an SKX but they have better automatic movements and decent quartz eco-drive options.
Better than what? A Swiss? Not on your life, my friend.
Just acquired a Navy Seal 3600 at a bargain price of £179 as opposed to list price of £535 as I’ve always wanted to try one! This is an impressive watch, with threaded crown, stainless screw down back & sapphire lens. Although lighter than a steel case it feels weighty and high quality. The carbonox case feels extremely durable and this watch definitely feels like a £500 watch. Whilst not the brightest ever, the lume from the tritium tubes is great, once your eyes have adjusted to the dark and it doesn’t need any light to activate it, being a huge bonus! Obviously Luminox produce many different watches and I think the reviewer here has picked the wrong watch to review, giving an unfairly negative view of the brand. He’d have come to a totally different conclusion had he reviewed the watch I’ve just bought (and I’m VERY fussy about quality) There are plenty of very positive reviews of Luminox watches out there but I guess a the end of the day we all have different opinions and I agree that the watch reviewed here doesn’t appear particularly special.
Luminox is a copy of the mil-w-46374f type 6. i.e. Traser P6500 Type 6, or Stocker & Yale SandY P650 Type 6.
Stocker & Yale and Traser both no longer make them (Stocker & Yale being out of production for quite some time).
You can still find the Traser P6500s (as well as the upgraded models), or look to KHS watches for newly produced ones.
Castle Doctrine I’m glad I scrolled through the comments, I was just about to say the same thing! I have a Traser P6500 which to all extents & purposes is a reissue of the SandY P650 as both were produced by mb-microtec ag Switzerland. The first Luminoxes were a US market copy of the P650. Initial runs were possibly done on contract by mb-microtec but there is no connection with Traser/mb-microtec now (apart from Luminox buying tritium vials). I think Luminox suffered when they went for crap quality & designs and full on marketing - there’s only a couple that could be said to be any good now, & they’re all far too expensive. Here’s some details from a Milspec Navigator watch comparison that has the P650 history & mentions Luminox in passing (pics gone through ‘linkrot’ long ago unfortunately just google the model No’s) forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.php?6371-American-Navigators-Marathon-G-and-Traser-H3-P6500
In the army I wore a luminox or a gshock or pathfinder depending on my mood and mission. Most seals I know/knew wore sins or sea dwellers. Seals have a long history with Rolex and get a great deal on them direct from Rolex to the teams where they are “permanently issued” to the teams.
They haven't permanantly issued Rolex's to the teams since the 1980's, my dude. Actually, it was issued during 1962-1983. In 1983, they switched to Omega Sea-dwelers and were quickly replaced in 1988 with Luminox. In 1996, the US Navy no longer issued watches to the teams.
I have the BlackOps 8881; basically the Navy Seal but with a sapphire crystal. I don't know how long you've had yours but the tritium on mine can light up a dark room. I paid $325, which is about $100 more than the Navy Seal but the sapphire crystal was worth it to me. The 'Navy Seal' or 'Black Ops' licensing doesn't mean anything to me as I think most special forces are using G-shocks. I bought mine because I think it looks really good, I love the tritium and I believe it's a very tough watch.
It's a toy. Don't buy. I have two. Regret both
@Jesus Christ Thanks Jesus. Means a lot to me that you have been duped as well. G Shocks and Seiko. Please don't let Satan place these others in our path
i have one, i regret even spending $110 on it while on sale
also, g-shock gang member here
the worst thing is that that exact watch was the first one that i bought and one that got me into this expensive hobby :(
@@4nhk066 I got the BO version. Almost cried when I saw the crystal had fogged. Paid $400 for it.
now THAT is bad...
Luminox = Underwheming
I’ve had the 8802 for about 10 years. Early in my watch journey it got a LOT of wrist time. Have the resin bracelet and it’s really good. Original strap rotted and had to replace it, but nearly 10 years is acceptable. Probably put 2 batteries in it. The tritium tubes on mine are still strong & bright, but has to be in very low light. Yes, I agree; case & crown do feel very flimsy. It’s an ok watch, but not a great value for the dollars you spend.
Really appreciate this review and it is spot on. Great job, Jory! 🍺
For next to nothing you could've bought the Casio MRW-200H which is very similar and with a day/date complication.
MagicThighs great watches, I’ve had three of them, I just give them away when I get bored with them, they don’t break. Lume is rubbish and there is no warning when battery runs out, otherwise the best analogue bargain watch out there......ultra accurate, too!
now there is MRW 210H which is bigger in diameter for those who have bigger wrist. very comfortable
Currently there are no standard issue Navy Seal watches.They are worn by preference and individually owned.Most wear Casio DW6600,but aside from Luminox, they also wear Timex,Tudor,Rolex,Seiko Diver,and Suunto
I bought the Luminox Sentry and love it. I wasn't expecting it to be anywhere near as durable as a G-Shock. It's got regular lume on the 12,2,4,6,8 and 10 but the hands and the 1,3,5,7,9 and 11 are the gas tubes and in a dark room I can see them from 15 feet. No matter the condition I have never not been able to tell the time. It was one my most worn watches until I got my GD-350. I've worn a G-Shock since 1986 and you just can't beat them in durability.
@Xavier Ancarno Agreed! Especially after this great very candid and detailed review. ANY resin Casio, G-Shock or not, will crush this “toy watch”. #T3
Hi:
I like the Luminox. Light watch that is easy to wear and comes in cool colors.
I was on a quest for a tough quartz tool watch with a classic set up of hands and a clock dial and not a digital display. I like reading the time that way.
My top three (money not an issue):
1. Marathon Quartz Diver. Awesome tank but a bit too chunky. Love it though. I had the JSAR.
2. Seiko Quartz Tuna. Yeah, the one you have is great. Love the hands and the rugged, industrial style. Easy to read. Whip ass build quality. Weird shape on my wrist though.
3. Sinn UX. Oh, man. I am so biased. This one is special. And expensive.
I have had all three and stuck with the Sinn. The UX, just like the other two, can do it all with me: drums, moto, hockey, wrenching, etc.
Thanks for the vid, kid!
--Michael
have you considered analog G-shocks? like the recently released GA-2100
Alexandre Yeah, I have owned a few. I had the three Master of G watches. I liked them all but they were just too big. I also tend to not like the straps on Casio watches. I just can't get a comfortable fit when really using them in very active situations.
Maybe if they refined the strap materials. I don't want to get the aftermarket j&k adapters for NATO straps. I'll keep my eyes open though!
--Michael
They really are light, comfortable, and accurate watches to wear from time to time!
I have a Luminox 3025 Coronado Black/Yellow that I bought new in July 2018 and it was almost perfect, losing only 4 seconds/month. I set it *_TO THE SECOND_* on the 1st of every month. It has bright glowing tritium tubes which I love because they are extremely easy to see at night, and they don't fade over a few seconds to a minute like the luminous painted watch hands do. The back is a screw-in type with six detents for inserting a watch wrench. The back is gasketed. The crown is not a screw in type, but it rotates with nice resistance, like it's rotating against a seal, and it has a decent click out and then similarly clicks back in. It's been a great watch.
Then on July 5th, 2023, it started exhibiting the battery needing replaced behavior of the second-hand stopping for 4 seconds and then advancing ahead 4 seconds all at once. So, it was still keeping correct time. Five years on the same battery isn't bad.
I took the watch to King's Jewelers to get the battery replaced. After the tech. replaced the battery, it wouldn't start running again. It was running when I walked into Kings, but not when I walked out. 🤷♂️. I don't know if there's *_some trick_* to getting the watch running after you replace the battery. I tried getting it running again with the old battery, putting the gold keeper arm across the top of the battery and carefully screwing down the back with just finger pressure, but I couldn't get it running again, at all. Maybe it has to be tapped lightly on the side to get it off of top dead center (if you catch my drift), I don't know.
I wish I'd taken the back off myself, so I could be *_100% sure_* of what battery was in it *_from Luminox,_* because the tech. replaced the battery out of my sight in the back of the store and therefore I'm not sure if she gave me the correct, old OEM battery back back. I mean she might have mixed it up with other batteries that she might have had laying around in her work area when she replaced it. 🤷♂️ There is only one way to put the battery in the watch, + side up, so it's not like you can get that wrong. The battery she gave me back is a ⤵️.
SR927
+
muRata
Hg O%
Japan
Nothing in the owner's manual says what type of battery it takes. So, I guess I'm going to send my Luminox 3025 Coronado in to Luminox battery replacement and checking it out.
I have a stainless steel 3502 navy seal my dad gave me from the 90’s about ten years back. The crown is threaded and feels very sturdy, it also clicks well. The bezel movement feels good. Tritium is a bit faded, but the watch is around 30 years old so I suppose that’s to be expected. It’s sapphire as well. I believe when he bought it it was the same price as this one.I guess they don’t make ‘em like they used to. If you can find an older one, I highly recommend it!
I should also mention that he wore it everyday for 20 years while working as a paramedic and I’ve worn it the majority of 10 years. This watch has definitely taken a beating but it’s still looking great and going strong.
Agree... you want an inexpensive watch that is tough! I bought an armitron watch before I went to ranger school. That was in the late 80’s. Still got it and it still works. That has to say something.
Really helpful video. I didn't expect your answer. You changed my opinion for these watches. Thanks.
Yep, I heard about the Navy Seal association and thought it was cool, but I’d read about them steaming up, when used in the sea etc. Forces personnel will use G shocks in theatre most of the time, they’ll take a beating and from only £45 or so. I have a 1984 DW5200 and it still looks immaculate and it’s been to two conflicts, at least. If folk want to go down a mechanical route and have a timepiece that’ll last and look good in Mess dress, then something like a Seiko SKX007 would be a good choice. Rolex lookalikes can be a good choice if made well. I’ve been keeping an eye on Enoksen watches, lately, they look great! Great video BTW.
You want my opinion, well you pretty much nailed it on your video, A fucking toy. Ive busted the band 4 times, my bezzel popped off somewhere on a jobsite, the crown loosened up and i dont know how which allowed moisture into the watch (which is pretty much a death sentance for any watch) and the kicker is its less then 3 months old. took it back during a band breakage time and asked if i could get a reeeeeefund, and the place i bought it at wasnt an authorized "fixer/repairer of luminox cept for stupid shit like bands or batteries. So I took it to an authorized dealer/repair shop and they tell me it aint under warranty no more and had to fork out almost $300.00 to get my $550.00 damn near, brand new P.O.S. toy watch fixed.
BTW I STILL HAVNT GOTTEN IT BACK AND ITS BEEN 8 WEEKS!
And the Navy Seals would want their name on this junk watch??? Maybe the Seals arnt as tuff and hardcore anymore. just sayin?
SEALS don’t issue this or use it. Luminox uses the SEAL designator because they sent some to the Teams for T&E back in the day and the OIC gave it a favorable review. If you wonder if it’s a real piece of kit, ask Luminox what the NSN is for their flagship SEAL watch. They don’t know what an NSN is.
The watches that get issues are G-Shock, Suunto X-Lander, and wayyyyyy back in the day Submariners.
Also check out Resco. Their watch is the only watch that’s gone through every phase of SEAL training.
Great and honest review. Happy to see someone speak truth about Luminox making cosplay kit.
I always liked victorinox for a good quartz watch. The inox series is super tough
I have had one for 10 years with no complaints. Wear it in a manufacturing environment and the case has been bulletproof - crystal not so much. Tritium still bright. No issues with water resistance or the crown. Paid about half of what you did brand new.
I have the 2017 Luminox 821 800 Ultimate Field Watch (currently discountinued)and it's a pip. Steel case and simple steel bezel. Xtra-thick Sapphire, 200m, Tritium that works (it does have a 12 yr half-life so it doesn't last forever), screw-down crown, 23 jewel ETA 241 Chrono movement. Top-quality leather strap. They've upped their game in recent years..on some models anyway.
Have to agree. I enjoy my Luminox 3051 but the only reason I have one is the retailer I work for had it available and I get a 40% discount. I got my 3051 for about 180.00. I wear it on the thick velcro Luminox strap and it is ridiculously comfortable. For an additional 30 bucks, I installed a sapphire crystal. So, it's pretty sturdy now. I have had it in the shower but that's the extent of the water exposure. I wouldn't trust this in the pool with the flimsy crown. Also, having popped the mineral crystal out, it doesn't sit super tight in the case like a stainless dive watch press-in crystal. My tritium works fantastic but only in total darkness.
Finally someone actually reviewing the Luminox brand. I've always been a g shock fan when it comes to toughness, but when I heard of luminox, I couldn't find much user information about them besides there own marketing. Thank you for clearing this up.
Don´t buy everything that he said. Luminox watches are good. Most people and i mean a LOT of people that complaint about Luminox bought fakes. The tritium tubes work for many years, water doesn´t get inside and it feals cheap because it´s so light due to the carbon case. Carbon is way stronger than metal and its magnetic resistant.
After owning several Luminox quartz and then really getting into watches, I settled on Armourlite watches for daily "hard use". They have decent tritium, can be had as autos, and won't break my heart if I destroy one and have to throw it away.
As a guy who has routinely gotten my hands dirty (and bloody), I have two automatic AL watches as "beater" watches. I now own a couple CrhWard autos, a Junghans MaxBill, a 1960's E. Borel, etc. But when I'm going to the field or putting out a house fire, I typically wear one of my AL autos. They are a good compromise of having a reliable auto that is fairly durable, but won’t break the bank or the heart.
Jacob Phillips Junghans Max Bill, you have class, Christopher Ward, nice, too.
Bit naff...endorsed by Bear Grylls.
Navy Seals may use them but I'm sure the SAS use G-shock 😉
In fact, a lot of SAS guys wear Luminox.
I have a 3003 evo navy seal, and it’s fantastic. It’s got a screw down crown and very positive bezel action. The Ronda 515 is a decent movement and the battery lasts 45 months (reportedly, I’ve only had mine for a week so far). It is what it is and I went into it with tempered expectations. I do t understand the hate.
get the victorinox Inox. Exactly this but does it right, tougher than any other watch out there
I agree the inox is awesome
I like them because they are lightweight and comfortable to wear. I also like to be able to read the time when it’s dark. But I agree, more of a toy watch. I have 3. The original has been perfect since day 1, almost 15 years. Another one needed to have the movement replaced and my 3rd Luminox needs to have the crystal cleaned or replaced. It’s gotten a little fogged/dull from the inside/underneath
I have been agonizing the last two months on purchasing a Luminox Navy SEAL watch for no other reason other than I like the style, but watching videos like this really put me off the asking price for the two models I like, both around £400. I've just purchased a Pulsar PM3129X1 for less than £60, looks so much like the watch I had issued whilst serving in the British Army, and its such a sturdy and heavy watch along with a great look, so comparing that to a Luminox, I think I'll wait until I have spare cash to throw away and then purchase a Luminox. Thanks for the honest review.
I wanted a luminox in the worst way but I was a bit skeptical due to the many reviews of shotty craftsmanship. It sounds like they have a bit of a quality control issue. Instead of a Luminox, I went with a KHS Dark Commander Pro II. This thing is the real deal. You should look into getting one and doing a review.
*If you watch Vigilant Elite (retired Navy SEAL/CIA contractor turned TH-camr)- you'll know that its common practice to wear a Rolex Submariner. Its 200m, tough, reliable, and also, you can pawn it anywhere in the world and have yourself enough money to escape out the country...*
There you go....the "Navy SEAL" watch.
I got a good deal on a SS case 3202 or something. It was ok in 2004. Still works after cracking the sapphire crystal and flooding it the shower after surfing. Got it fixed up and gave it to my 13 year old who thinks its cool. Lum is shot, but that’s expected. Heavy on marketing for sure. I had friends in the teams and they always gave me a hard time about it. Seiko SKX these days.
Sounds like a professional review with quite serious arguments. I purchased a Luminox 3051 BO (before watching this vid !) to practice kayak as an alternative to wearing my Rolex Deepsea for fear of damaging it. We’ll see how it behaves, but I basically agree with the cons : non screw able bezel, not a sapphire glas, it also seems battery life decreases a lot after initial battery replacement on Luminox. Perhaps a G shock would have been a better choice…Thank you !
I have 2 getting repaired for the 3rd time!! They last around 2 years if you use it every day and are always out. Also good luck getting it fixed! If you’re in US you have to send it in to the official repair in RI. I Am looking into a G-Shock..
I have the blackout Navy Seal chronograph. Got mine used for about 100 bucks, changed out the strap for a 23mm NATO strap; the mineral glass was already scratched so I changed it for a sapphire. The tritium tubes are still glowing, and when they wear out, I will try to remove and glue new ones. Of course I've got some watch repair tools, and this sort of dorking around with the watch is not for everybody. but I'm very satisfied with my Luminox as a backpacking watch: very light. However I would not have paid full retail price for it.
Most of them are basically cheaper made analog G-shocks that wear smaller on the wrist. My first one was probably the best in their lineup: the 4221.
This was the only one I believe that was actually deemed “Authorized for Navy Use”. It had a threaded crown, full steel black DLC case and case back, 60 click rotating bezel, and the tritium tubes were not bad. the problem was that it was chunky and it wore very large. After losing a few pounds, it’s extremely heavy on my 6.5 inch wrist.
The original 3000 Navy seal series was the only other one I knew of that possessed a threaded crown. Usually if it was a steel case with a 200m WR rating, it had a threaded crown. Outside of that, not likely.
I have a luminox five watch; it has a screw in crown, sapphire glass, and is stainless steel. It has a 200 meter water rating which I can’t attest to though I can attest to about 110 feet. Some are good, some are cheap, just like anything else; know what you’re buying. With tritium just like night sights it fades over time. You should get 3-5 bright years with 10-15 years of usability but definitely a noted degradation. The watch gas an advantage as you can check time one gander regardless of light condition. I will say I also have worn G-Shock and Timex. A watch is a tool and while mist all will tell time some do it under more circumstances or more effectively then others. As a LEO that works at night the luminox and S&W tritium watch, similar but only $100, work best as you don’t need a second hand to turn on a light/illumination.
About time someone called out "Luminox". There is not a big difference between this and the cheapest Casio analogue for $20-$25. "Luminox" must spend a fortune on the "Mil-Spec" photos/videos for their website and I am really surprised they haven't been told to take the Seal Insignia" off those watches. If there was "Stolen Valour" for marketing???
Ok for a 10/12 year old son or daughter who was sports/active but G-shock would be my first go to. When Jory said $550 I think my neighbours heard me choke on my breakfast.
I've owned a 3001.BO since 2013. I have mixed feelings about this watch.
Contrary to the reviewer, I find the lume on this watch to be incredible in the dark - I never seen anything comparable. The other big positive is the comfort - this is the most comfortable watch I've ever owned, and the most comfortable to wear while sleeping.
On the flip side, it hasn't been terribly durable. In 2017 the movement stopped working, and needed to be replaced at a cost of C$185 (incl labour). The strap had to be replaced in 2019 for about C$85. The plastic bezel has a gouge in it at the 12 OC marker. The mineral crystal has quite a number of scratches, and some bad chipping/disintegration along the edge in one spot. The watch has recently stopped, and I worry that it's the movement again.
The deterioration and repairs needed by this watch is shocking for a ~C$500 Swiss watch marketed as suitable for the most extreme conditions, considering that watch sees mainly evening/morning use prior to swapping out for a different watch during the day. I've owned several Citizens in a similar price range also with mineral crystals, but worn under tougher conditions, that are showing far less wear on the crystal (although the paint on the bezels are a different story).
All that said, the comfort of this watch is so good that I am considering an alternative "Carbonox" Luminox as a replacement, perhaps an 8880 series or a 3500 series.
BTW, I have a G-shock GA-700UC ana-digi as a beater watch - I'm sure it's very durable, but it's a horribly designed watch that's unusable in low light conditions. I will be looking at more expensive ones as a replacement to the Lumi, I hope they are better designed....
I've had my Luminox 3059 Navy Seal for several years. I have no military service, though I wear it on many hiking, fishing, kayak, canoe, camping trips...it's taken a beating and still functions perfectly. The tritium has not faded and though it doesn't seen very bright under gloomy conditions, it really shines in actual darkness after other lume has faded. Though maybe after another decade it might fade as the OP's has. I will say I'm more willing to abuse my G-Shocks..but that's because I like them less.
There are several complaints with Luminox. I love my 3583 chronograph, but its flawed and Ive read many reports of Luminox owners having the same issues. Some light fogging under the crystal with certain weather conditions and the second hand stopping just short of the 12 o clock position when resetting the chrono. Ive also read Luminox no longer offers tritium replacement services at its one service center in the US, which is a major buzzkill.
I'm not even waiting for the end of this video to give my comment. Luminox sucks. I've been in law enforcement for 35 years and one of my first work watches was a luminox (can't remember the model) damn thing fogged up when I looked at water and it went through batteries yearly. Over the years I've seen numerous rookie cops get a "high speed" luminox only to have it crap out within 12 months (or less) of acquiring it. My 1983 Seiko quartz diver still runs my luminox from 1999 is in pieces in some dark bin under my work bench.
Sal Matos Jr great comments, love Seiko
I agree 100% with you. We had a luminox specially make us a watch with our kaw enforcement logo. Cost me $265, it last me little over 2 years of daily wear. It cost me $165 to have it fix. Not worth the money. Now I wear a Shock. Again I agree Luminox Is A TOY.
I was close to falling for the Luminox marketing when I was purchasing a new duty watch. I’ve had great luck with dive watches as my duty watches and never had an issue with them. I ran into an associate running a Luminox. He wasn’t impressed and cracked two crystals when hitting it against the ground. Super glad I didn’t waste money on one of these.
You seriously dodged a bullet then.
so marathon watches are better than luminox?? price range are exactly the same. hrm...🤔
Thanks for the honest review. Im a bit cooled off now to go and get one for me. What do you think abot Traser?
I tried it on today and thought it was ridiculously comfortable and fun summer watch.
I own a Luminox with stainless steel case and no saphire christal. I’ve had it since 2004. It works without any flaws. Needs battery replacement every 4 years. Tritium tubes still glow in the dark and runs perfectly accurate for almost 20 years now. I also own a few g-shocks gwg-2000 and gmwb-5000mb and they need sync with atomic clock to be accurate. Otherwise they shift roughly 2 seconds per week. Luminox on the other hand runs perfectly accurate for four years until the battery needs to be replaced. I’m an airline pilot and i wear it almost every day. I swimm with it, ride my bike, take it to the woods… It has a few scratches, I’ve knocked it into the walls and doors but the watches are intended to be worn. Every scratch has a unike stroy and that’s the beauty of wearing a watch. And to tell time, of course 😂
I’ve been thinking of buying another one
I’m sure that if you took a real life survey of actual SEALs, you’d find that most (by far) are wearing GShocks and very few are wearing Luminoxes.
Most use the Suunto Core black
@@G4x5da are you serious!? Lol
Actually, these days, G-Shocks. When I was in the Navy, primarily, it was Luminox. I have a friend on the teams and he swears by it. Why? No buttons to push or backlight to read the time in the middle of the night.
If you want the look, get a Casio MRW200H, looks similar to a Luminox for $20. I've had excellent service from every Casio I've owned - they are incredibly durable.
I work in the world to know what watches these guys use. They use what they want. Of course they are issued Pathfinder/Garmin Tactix/Suuntos on occasions, they use what they want. That goes for all SOF military. This is all strictly marketing. Never seen a frogman with a Luminox on. Never seen many commandos with an analog watch also. Especially on the battlefield.
A lot of Call of Duty maybe...