Lisan Al Gaib | Dune Part 2 Analysis
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 มิ.ย. 2024
- Dune Part 2 Review. Dune Part 2 has set a new standard for science fiction cinema, delivering an action-packed, visually stunning, and profoundly immersive experience that surpasses all expectations. Join me as I dive into how this epic sequel combines A-list performances, groundbreaking visuals, and a gripping story to create what may be the best science fiction cinematic experience of all time!
Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction
00:59 Cast & Characters
01:44 Plot & World-building
02:42 Cinematography
03:29 Sound
04:54 Final Words - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
Already is one of my favourite movies of all time!
bs, there is no way the marvels cost 270 million, that is total crap. no way. if so its a money laundering scheme. seriously. i saw better effects in Strange new world.
Haven't seen a movie on the big cinema screen in ages. Made an exception for Dune part two. My only complaint was that it was too short. If the movie was 10 hours long, I would still complain it was too short. I was simply left with the feeling that I wish the story would never end, and that the movie would never stop. 2H46M felt like an hour. That's a good movie to me. When the movie doesn't drag, and you pray the film won't stop.
Yes my eyes were truly glued to the big screen!
hans zimmer is the goat
🐐
Ear-gasm for real!
Genuinely so happy with what they have done with Dune. THANK YOU Zimmer and Villeneuve
Yes Dune is becoming an all-time great. And bringing its makers with it!
My favourite film. Fourth viewing this weekend
fantastic!
4:56 actually same! I have watched it too 2 times in cinema and i got goosebumbs everytime. Even watching this video gave me goosebumbs. Dune 1 and 2 are just so good films
Can u do a vid on King Kong and Godzilla, the new empire because I think the VFX was amazing but it was hard to understand the story and plot as there where hardly anyone talking
As a HUGE movie fanatic and aspiring actress Dune 2 makes me even more hopeful and proud of my future line of work! It's a masterpiece and even better than the first one in my opinion. ❤❤❤❤
I totally agree Dune is revolutinising sci-fi fantasy on the big screen.
I thought it was a very beautiful movie in the style and its pacing and story has so many layers. Top ten sci-fi movie for sure. It may go top 5 for me depending on dune messiah. That will be the the movie to see if dune becomes a franchise with staying power. Dune messiah kinda split the fans back in the day for many reasons. If they stay true to the spirt of messiah,yet change or tweak parts it may work out for most fans. Enjoyed the video u made. Thank you. Also loved the sound and soundtrack.Also if u can see it in 4DX it is a ride and truly puts u in the flim. Imax was great,even standard was. But 4DX was perfect.
haha I wish I couldn't even watch it in true IMAX since they don't have it here in my city...
As much as I love Dune Part One and Dune Part Two, I do believe to be honest that Villeneuve made some strange decisions. He really did a great job in a lot of things. But sadly does a rather bad one in others. One of them, is the lore or mysticism of Dune, for the lack of better words.
For example, when you read the book, it actually gives some explanations which are missing in the movie. And it has a lot do with a faction Villeneuve decided to leave out for the most part. The Guild Navigators. For example the Fremen actually bribe the Guild Navigators with spice so they make sure there are no satelites over the planet. And there are many other instances where Villieneuve decided to either not include or severely cut crucial informations. The role of Mentats, the importance of Spice - outside of "just" space travel! And so on.
I also believe Dune Part Two is "weaker" compared to Dune Part One. Particularly when it comes to the Emperor and the Harkonnen. The Harkonnen have been awesome in Part One. They felt like a great threat, cunning, calculating - just as how the Baron has been described in the book. But in Part Two? They feel like cartoon villains. Nothing of that intellect and intelligence was really there. I also, again, don't understand why the role of the Guild Navigators and Mentats was pretty much cut. Those two are such an important part of the Dune setting. It's like removing all the elves from Lord of the Rings or something like that. The pacing of Dune Part Two is also a bit strange. There are some weird cuts and plot elements. It was better done in the previous movie I believe.
I love Villieneuves take on Dune. But it's not without flaws.
Yeah a lot of people were waiting for the Guild Navigators to come in at some point, but you're right in that Villieneuves does omit some aspects from the lore of Dune in his interpretations. However you have to admit he included an impressive amount of detail into a single movie whilst also making it immersive and cinematic, any more would have stretched the movie to like 5 hours long! Unless you have like some dialogue explaining everything but that's just cheap and not believable.
So good I watched it two times in the same weekend
Same!
I loved this movie! Great video as well!!
thank you!
With a few amazing highlights, I just thought the movie overall was just meh. SO many totally avoidable plot holes
I was sorely disappointed. In all seriousness, I booed at the credits I was so disappointed. Dune 2024 is a shallow imitation of Dune 2000.
That's definitely your opinion, buddy. And it's... not a popular one that's for sure.
@@drkevin1302 the truth does not have to be popular to be the truth. Dune 2000 is a masterpiece of sci-fi. It is objectively a better adaptation than the 2024 POS that Denis Villnue's pretentious garbage.
Villeneuve's Dune is actually High Fantasy, not Science Fiction
I mean sci-fi fantasy... it's cross genre at best; with literal spaceships, lasers and planetary travel it definetly fits in the sci-fi category.
@@drkevin1302 It’s a High Fantasy narrative with a Sci-Fi aesthetic
Great video tho! You’ve gained a new subscriber
It is epic but in some technical points is so stupid. For instance, bad guys control Universe, but do not now what is happening in some desert lands. Or The Emperor comes to the planet with all his army and their surveillance service do not know about enemy's army in 2 km from them.
The movie is based like 25,000 ahead in the future. Human society once collapsed over computer technology and AI and over 1000 years of struggle humans barely survived and rebuilt society. They now don’t have computers due to a computer and AI ban. The ships are piloted by “Guild Navigators” and any necessary computations are done by cyborg modified humans instead.
@@BazookaTroopazthis isn't in the movie...there lack of context is so frustrating to me
@@francoscalviI personally prefer the minimalist exposition. They show you a lot of this, but it’s not explained through dialogue like other movies that exposition dump.
@@BazookaTroopaz your explanation is a good example of how dune 2 has poor story telling.
There are things you can and cannot "show". Way to much was missing for this film to be coherent without previous knowledge.
As much as I love Dune Part One and Dune Part Two, I do blame the director for this to be honest. He really did a great job in a lot of things. But sadly does a rather bad one in others. One of them, is the points you mentioned.
When you read the book, it actually gives some explanations for it. And it has a lot do with a faction,Villeneuve decided to leave out for the most part. The Guild Navigators. For example the Fremen actually bribe the Guild Navigators with spice so they make sure there are no satelites put over the planet. And there are many other instances where Villieneuve decided to either not include or severely cut crucial informations. The role of Mentats, the importance of Spice - outside of "just" space travel! And so on.
I love his take on Dune. But it's not without flaws.
visually the movie is immense and the audio is incredible but i felt the story suffered in the book-movie transition
Yes it's pacing in the last half of the movie suffered, and largely due to how Paul Atredeis technically knows exactly what happens in the future so he just does stuff without explanation.
Am I the only one who thought it was just ok
Yes you are😂
Me. It was technically impressive, but it left me feeling cold. I had no emotional connection to any of the characters.
@@starlit_hawser11 this is my exact criticism. I'm so happy I'm Not alone here.
I didn't have a single emotion the entire time and the characters, with only a couple of exceptions, felt extremely flat.
@@adamplentl5588 I think that a lot of people are dazzled by the scale and impressive visuals at this point. I expect that more critical analyses of the film will be forthcoming once the initial bedazzlement has worn off.
@@adamplentl5588 same!
villeneuve and dune 2 is like a renowned university professor who has to adjust after realizing that a good portion of his first year class
1 havent read a book in a couple of years
2 do not arrive prepared for class
3 are on their phone tik toking and video gaming
4 live a fast food and fast life existence
5 and still complained to admin about the professor and course material
the visual and emotional reactions of some folks to dune 1 and 2 is like that of one seeing an expertly designed foundation versus an expertly designed house while some other folk only care about amusement park rides
If you just said 'I didn't like the movie' that would have been fine. People are allowed to have different opinions! But to be condescending to the vast majority of people who liked a movie is just beyond ignorant...
Also, I'm pretty sure roller coasters require a lot more high-end engineering than houses.
@@drkevin1302 that went completely over your head hahaha
It certainly didnt exceed everbodys expectations. There are many faults to be had with the film.
Well let's just say most people's expectations...
If Villanue Dune is the future of science fiction, it would be a very empty, shallow, devoid of any world building future, very bleak, Villanue basically copy the Star Wars Sequels, with barely any substance. What happen when science fiction actually care about not only telling a good story, but showing the factions and the universe?
Frank Herbert didn't invent the desert. He didn't invent Bedoin culture. He didn't invent the white savior narrative. It's the cinematography and aesthetics that are well done.
Yes Frank Herbert had his inspiration as well, but that doesn't make his novels obsolete. It's like saying the invention of cheese was obsolete since milk was already discovered. But I do agree with you, it's the cinematography and aesthetics that carries the movie.
You clearly didn't read the books because Paul is NOT a white savior or savior of any kind. He was a damn galactic war lord who killed over 60 billion people. All Pauls visions lead to ruin.
Movie is not a white savior movie? It would have to show Fremen to be completely hopeless and show that Paul becoming messiah is a good thing which if you read the books or payed attention on a movie completely isn't.
itni bhi achi nahi thi
We all better hope Dune 2 isn't defining science fiction because I would really like there to watchable scifi movies in the future
What do you mean??? Every scifi movie would be even better if it had the level of detail and thought put in to it like dune 2 or interstellar had.
Not sure how following Dune would be better. If they had poor cinematography, poor set design, poorly directed actors and tons of bloat I dont think anyone would think that was an improvement. @@giblegabite929
What didn't you like? Everything was amazing from the characters to the visuals and sound. I feel like whatever I had to criqtique (which was minimal) came nowhere close to outweighing the level of immersion with cinematography, music and SFX that Dune Part 2 provided!
The short answer: the most obvious failure is the complete lack of any sense of scale. The cinematography was so poor that it felt like a stage play. As for what was well done, I will list it now. @@drkevin1302
@@drkevin1302 There are important key elements missing. For example the narrative happend to quickly. The movie covers the evolution of Paul which took >years< in the book. Paul also had a son with Chani which was killed by the Harkonnen. A lot of the characterdevelopment left me somewhat empty. And I actually really like Dune Part Two. But I think it's weaker compared to Part One. It did a much better job at creating a cohesive pacing that felt natural. In Part Two the cuts and change in pacing can be quite strange at times. Particularly Pauls transition from the "I don't want to be the Messiah" to "Ok I will totally be the Messiah now!". That didn't feel natural to me. Also Villineuves decision to completly cut out mentats and the Guild Navigators. Like wtf. One of the most important plot elemets of Dune.
More epic than Lord of the Rings????
IDK man, I feel like this movie is definitely a little overrated.
LOTR is my second favourite movie of all time so not a better movie per say, but in terms of the scale and 'epicness' I feel like it at least matches LOTR: the build-up, soundtrack and visuals on the big screen is what makes this movie so good.
Am I the only one who thought this one was a major let down after the first? Everything just.. "happened".
SPOILER ALERT
Emperor was just a dude who got overthrown in a sec, deus ex nukes all of a sudden, Harkonnen magically turns into wimps, instant relationship, main character can suddenly see the future so no problems defeating the enemy, new "bad guy" thrown in and introduced in like 2 minutes and defeated just as fast, rides the biggest badest sand snake with no training (shown at least), no problem getting followers etc etc etc
Whole bunch of meh.
damn that's a... that's a take right there bud.
@@CadillacDeVilledElegance soundtrack and cinematography was awesome at least.
Honestly, I got disappointed the second I stepped into the cinema since it turned out my mates had bought tickets at the very back (they wanted cushy seats apparently..). When I got to the cinema I want that large screen massive sound experience, so I always get tickets in the very center. That probably colored my impression. Will watch it again as soon as I can stream it. The way I saw it now I might as well have watched it on my phone.
almost like you watched a bad movie based on a bad book
@@NoNickname904 sure, but I thoroughly enjoyed the first one. But yeah, a friend who's read the books says the book is the same way: Boom! Shit happens.
no spacing guild stuff, dissapointed