He also didn't seem to be too happy in the Borgia's employ either. Yeah, I know him too. He made me some climbing gloves that shoot knives at people. Pretty cool dude.
I couldn’t agree more. Painter, sculptor, scientist, mathematician, musician, dancer, conversationalist, and who knows what else. I’m so glad you chose him as the most intelligent. No-one deserves it more.
@@nerdstark9002 The question wasn't "who had the biggest impact". Darwin was no doubt a brilliant thinker and dedicated biologist who had a mindblowing impact on our understanding of the natural world. But he got there through huge advantages (being classically educated/from a wealthy background), but mainly worked incredibly hard by closely studying and observing species he kept and studied at home, and by going on expeditions and seeing the natural world for himself, challenging the thinking of the day. But as Thoughty-2 said, Da Vinci was hundreds of years ahead of his time in terms of his engineering understanding and inventions, things which took incredible spacial awareness and understanding of physics - while also being one of the most talented painters of all time, and his understanding of human anatomy being so advanced that things he learned are only now being proven to be true! That's incredible, especially when you consider the lowly birth and lack of formal education he had. That certainly deserves the title of being a genius, he did far more than "screwed around with great ideas". How arrogantly dismissive.
I’m not sure but you and I might be related. My grandma said the same thing to me. I am guessing she never realized that the two of us would never meet and catch her feeding us the same line
Being a polymath and understanding the information he was given and how to make use of it in practice is how he was so far ahead of anyone else, still to date!
Another thing about Da Vinci is that his painting technique for the mona lisa was so complex that no one has been able to accurately reproduce it. Not only were his ideas just insane for his time, but his painting was also and still is revolutionary.
Fun fact the Mona Lisa although impressive isn’t his best work nor is it the technique the hardest to master and also it’s been replicated in numerous works. It’s considered the best because he said so. Man was the greatest troll ever.
da vinci and michaelangelo both didn't prefer painting to their other hobbies but ended up being considered the two best technically gifted painters ever.
The fun thing with Da Vinci is that he *was* a painter to the core : most of the things he learned were in order to further his art. … Now that’s badass.
The only reason he even studied those Cadaver's were because he wanted to correctly depict a human being's proportions in his paintings. The dude goes 110% on everything.
@@iskeptical5698 Human interest. Probably thought "while I'm venturing this endeavor might as well find out human anatomy while I'm at it". Just simply curious and applied himself to everything that caught his attention and pretty much sums up every genius or great discovery known to man "Curiosity". He was no shut in either and knew people and kept safe during all of those time so yeah he was all alone and the world was at his mercy and people back then just didn't pay attention like now. There's a person out there not using his 100% just coz he couldn't since the world right now has its standards and be at the right place at the right time at the right circumstances and that's just the world's RNG system "Random Number Generator aka RNGeesus".
@@JustSomeDude848 Exactly. We Hoomans have been doing that since forever and it all started when hoomans started manipulating its surroundings to bend to their will. From banging rocks to going to the moon to satellites that gives our phones signal and connecting everyone in the world. From using plants as herbs to BigPharma. From a simple cart to a freight train. From funny pictures in caves to the internet. Just plain ol hooman curiosity and being the clever monkeys we are we grow exponentially and if you think about it its pretty beautiful how mad we are with our pursuit to being close to godlike super powers and everyone wants to be a god "Everyone".
I read a book called Art and Physics in the 90's. This book did a great job of uniting these two seemingly disparate concepts. At the end of this rather long book it espoused the singularity of Leonardo DaVinci as proof of a man that can bring these two vastly different fields together. He was equally a great scientist and great artist, the likes of which we may never see again.
This deserves thousands more ‘likes’. You stated the case very distinctly and logically. The book sounds fascinating. But it seems you have been some sort of comedian to get thousands of likes. Have a great day, sweetie :) 🤔🥸🌷🌱
@@feralblueeThank you for the compliment. I try to state my case succinctly when possible. It’s definitely a good read, especially if both subjects interest you.
“The smartest person ever is not who you think” My thought went straight to DaVinci but I’ve been a super nerd since forever and I knew a lot about his work. DaVinci was mind blowingly creative. And Albert Einstein said “imagination is more important than knowledge” I do believe DaVinci had both.
The smartest person ever was probably from sub-saharan Africa. Genetic series are used as an indicator to predict the probability of genius within a group. Orangutans have 3 genetic series, apes have 4, chimpanzees have 5, every human race has 6 with the exception of sub Saharan Africans with 9. The genetic diversity in 1billion Africans is more than the rest of the world combined. E.g the tallest people are the Dinka tribe from South Sudan and the shortest are the Pygmies from DRC. West African decent like Jamaicans are the fastest etc. Nigerians are the most educated immigrants in the US and they have the highest education attainment rate, outperming all other groups, according to the US Bureau of statistics. In terms of genius and intelligence, that extreme is likely to be found in sub-saharan Africa.
Brilliant reporting and analysis, and I am agreement with you. You made no mention of Da Vinci as a sculptor, and though this may be the least developed of his media, it should not be ignored.
It was a blessing in disguise that it took so long for DaVinci's Codex to be found and studied. Back in his time he may have been deemed a heretic and executed before he could finish it. I have to agree, he was probably the most brilliant human being ever to have lived, and undoubtedly way ahead of his time.
@@Travellahh How come? Jersey Devil is probably right. He was talking about intelligence aka iq, you don't learn that, you are born with it or not. Statistically, there probably were some poor people with +300iq who ended up as slaves to the rice fields... Or some monk, who didn't care about sharing his brilliance with others (zen masters). But yeah you are right, it's definitely not you since you can't think back in history...
Intelligence is not fully innate. It can be developed. It's not that there is some wunderkund lost in time that could trump all of the educated scientists and workers in history. The only way to get better is through hard work put into your field of interest. Those are the people who achieve things, not a wunderkund who "just knows things."
I saw someone else say it, the probable most smart person to ever live most likely lived a thousand years ago, had no education and worked as a farmhand until death.
He was just one of the most iconic. And we really dont know if it was actually his knowledge or someone's knowledge he bought/stole.. In those times and now the rich mainly are the one's writing history (his-story) books.
Guys don't you know who ramanuchan is dude he is so unrecognized he wrote two whole books of his theories which he couldn't explain as he died the ones which he solved was out of the world for any mathematical genius there he didn't even go to school
Imagine if we could bring Leonardo back and show him everything we have now. I think that while he'd be impressed, he'd also be simultaneously disappointed that flight wasn't achieved much sooner.
If Da Vinci came back to life, he'd be off finding new discoveries for the problems that humanity is faced with right now. He couldn't care less about satisfying his ego, I'm sure.
Davinci has always been one of my favorite people. You can watch hours and hours of information about him and still never be able to fully realize how incredible he was.
I'm very good at weighing probability....Which....Makes me good at taking tests. I'm not going to say that I'm not smart....Just not as smart as my test scores would indicate.
When translated from the ancient, mirrored Italian, his description of his tank read: "When this baby gets up to 88 miles per hour, you're gong to see some serious shit"
@@emilandreasson9670 Lost in translation... Metric didn't hit Florence for nearly 300 years. In 16th century Florence Leo would have been measuring in Braccio's, which are about: (394mm = 1 Braccio) Saying "When this bambino hits 357 Braccio's per hour...." does not have quite the same ring to it. Except that they didn't use hours as we know it either. Back then the day was divided into four 6-hour blocks. I could do the math, except, this comment is already too long :)
I’ve always consider Leonado da Vinci the ultimate ”genius” after visiting an exhibition in the 80’s about his life and work. And just as he, coming from a simple back ground, I sometimes wonder how many individuals we as humanity loses out on because children all over the world are held back at schools (or even missing out of it)? What if we really as a world community saw to and guaranteed all children a proper education for them? I think we would be farther ahead as humanity and as a species too.
His background wasn't all that humble. His father was pretty wealthy and even though Leonardo was born out of wedlock, he was still taken in and financially supported by his father.
Well, you know that will never happen. How can you control intelligent, well educated folks with polarizing fear and in-fighting like you see in many places today? I'm with you in the hope, I just don't see it happening due to the above and the fact that most modern society is far too indulgent to actually sacrifice anything to make a big change. Most folks are afraid to lose anything or face hardship willingly for change, which means things will be very hard to change as the majority will not take action without a strong impetus.
4 ปีที่แล้ว +1
Studies have shown that I.Q is hereditary up to 87% then the nature and nurture argument comes in, which adds approximately 5 I.Q-points and the rest is speculative. So two stupid people have stupid children. Schooling wouldn't make a dent. That's why a man (in a country I cannot recall) with an I.Q of 40 is banned from having children!
I dunno .... drop a sheet of paper and watch its flight . The resistance to air alters as it zig zags toward the ground in an uncontrolled fashion . Do you consider it a pain in the arse or something to dwell over ? . Do you seek and find merit in working out the invisible forces that contort the paper on its trajectory ? . Do you consider the nature of paper and its woven construction , its edges , the shape of the paper , the weight ? . Do you see worth in pressing forward with what it gives that seems without value ? ...... well its absolutely pointless in 2020 to seek to create a finite understanding but in 1475 to scribe for prosperity would demonstrate genius given it was most likely considered by others but not memorialised . get to be the first = genius . I came up with the concept of propulsion in a unique and i8nteresting form whilst doing a course . Penned it and presented to be told the jet engine had already been done .... bollocks .... now if a simple lad from a fuck awful council estate can create this then we all have a degree of genius in us .... but not timing .
I remember reading somewhere that there are an estimated million+ children in Indian slums with an IQ over 125. Crazy to think who we might have missed out on due to poverty
If you go to the museum about Da Vinci in Firenze, Italy, you will be mind blown. I already expected him to be huge genius, but honestly it's difficult to describe how ahead of his time his thinking was.
Been watching you're channel for a good few month now. And just want to say your choice of topics have been eye opening and educational. Also your presentation of them makes it all the more enjoyable so I just want to say "THANK YOU" and keep up the good work.
People just despise immutable traits such as innate talent, they'd rather believe that they can have the same capability if they try enough, just a figment even though they may not be willing.
I've always loved the horsepower analogy regarding IQ in humans. The car with the most raw horsepower isn't always the car fastest around the track; especially considering the track in question. It will best other cars in a straight line but that's basically the only assurance. IQ is similar in a way. It's a solid measurement of one's raw brain computation (horsepower), but the application of that horsepower varies greatly depending on the subject/task/problem at hand. Genius manifests in many ways. IQ is only one of many metrics that can determine that potential.
An IQ test is really only useful to determine if someone is legally retarded or not. Anything above 80 doesn’t really mean anything especially how intelligent anyone is. The persons age also has a lot to do with it. For what it’s worth, when I was in 7th grade (12), the school I attended wanted to make sure I wasn’t retarded and scheduled an IQ test with the state (extremely well funded school). It took an entire school week (around 40 hours total). Turns out that in 7th grade the state of Illinois determined my IQ was 142. Yet, I was failing 9 classes and couldn’t learn Spanish to save my life. Although those numbers really don’t mean anything (other than I wasn’t legally retarded and there was no excuse to be failing classes) at 34 years old, I’ve always been curious to see what my score would be now. Just for fun. IQ isn’t really a solid way to measure anything other than if someone is capable of comprehending basic reality enough to be a society-contributing adult. Having said what I did, I sincerely wouldn’t put too much faith in IQ testing more than equating it to a parlor trick to annoy your friends.
@@ryanwilson5936 The mere fact that you came to that conclusion without actually doing a thing to prove it shows your conclusion is worthless. You, all by yourself, with not even the ATTEMPT to test it on yourself by retesting and seeing if your score varies by any huge margin (barring improvements in testing over the years and the known slight variation norms) just "knows" that IQ tests are useless... but all of science doesn't. Brilliant.
I gotta say, Assassin's Creed 2 and Brotherhood taught me more than i thought. As Ezio you get to try out all those secret engineering projects yourself, and even find out what kind of people Cesare Borgia, Caratina Sforza and even da Vinci himself were. That game made me so attatched to da Vinci as a friend, that whenever i see his name getting mentioned i get a little emotional and think "hey, that's my buddy, glad to know more people are recognising him :')" but then realise that he'd been dead for about 500 years.
HAHA!!! When you announced that you were reading off a list of the Greatest Geniuses in History, the 1st one I thought of, and was SURE would be on there was da Vinci! Now, before I listen to the rest of your show, I know his genius was estimated at 220. Maybe more? I started studying da Vinci at 11. How I found him, or what began my fascination with his genius was when my 6th grade teacher told my class to write a book report. I had no idea? So, I went to the library, closed my eyes tight, and raised my arm, and fingertips as high as they could reach. Feeling a spine, my hand landed on one book, which I then, pulled down from the shelf. I was shocked and in awe, that I had pulled down by chance, the biography of Leonardo da Vinci. Opening what would be an Aladdin treasure chest to my senses, my eyes, read as one starving 30 days on, would devour food, relishing the knowledge newly discovered. This man, held every important title possible on more subjects than any human in history, and spearheaded inventions that would have catapulted humankind from the 15th century to the 21st. I found myself attempting, at every chance, to tell everyone in earshot of the Greatest Genius, to my eyes, that had ever lived Ever since, that notion of unearthly, intrinsic brilliance, had never been effaced from my soul.
This was so interesting! But I feel sorry for the guy with the 300 IQ whose parents had him on a forced learning program from the time he was born. He should have been allowed to become whatever was in him to become, like Leonardo de Vinci was. Comparing the "learning system" of each is sadly ironic. It certainly didn't seem to do the guy or anyone else any good.
William James Sidis *did not* have an IQ of 250-300. That info was made up by his sister and mom with no evidence that sidis ever took an in test, never mind scored that high. But undoubtedly, he was nonetheless extremely intelligent and a child prodigy.
Well, even if he was a genius, it doesn't mean he'd accomplish anything. Motivation and curiosity are a big factor in accomplishments across all fields of education. This is what makes Da Vinci a genius. He was curious about everything and he was motivated enough to research about what he wanted to know. It wouldn't take a huge genius to make all the discoveries he made. In fact what you'd call a genius today could theoretically have done the same as Da Vinci back then. In todays world there's just no possibility for one to excel at everything at a degree that you would be considered a genius amongst all of them. That is why saying that Da Vinci is the smartest human EVER is controversial. In fact, it's not possible to say that about anyone, because "smartness", intelligence and genius are no measurable things.
@@rudolfdirks9253 I think you're missing the point. With no formal education, Da Vinci was able to put to paper ideas that were only brought to life centuries later. Ideas that medical doctors of today use. It's almost unimaginable. He was a starting point, which is difficult to do once, yet he did it multiple times.
@@ux1-15 I think you're missing my point. I do understand fully that he was a genius in a way like Einstein, who had a different way of thinking that could revolutionise the field he was working in. However what I was saying is something different. We don't know if he is the greatest genius ever, because a genius of his caliber could easily walk among us, but not be recognised, because every field of knowledge is way ahead of what Da Vinci had. To put it in other words: if there is a person smarter than Da Vinci, he will never be recognised as that, because he can't excell in all fields across the board. Da Vinci was able to do that, because of curiosity and his genius. But it doesn't exactly mean that he was actually smarter than maybe even your average high-schooler today (intelligence has a lot to do with knowledge and how much knowledge you can recall at any given point).
Ambidextrous person who can right normally with the right and mirrorscript with the left reporting. In my case, I have never bothered to train myself , in fact it just turned out that I just spontaneously started writing mirrorscript whenever I picked up the pencil with the left hand. My mom reports i could write both ways right from the beginning, around when I was 2 or so. It's like Harry Potter speaking Parseltongue. It just automatically happens if I try to write with my left hand. Any language which I can write with my right, even if you freshly teach me one right now, just gets automatically laterally inverted by my brain when I attempt it with my left hand. I can also write properly with my left hand when I am consciously intending to. The only reason I write mirrorscript is to impress people because it's fucking cool to be able to do something so unique without even trying, and at times to make sure no one doesn't bother to read my emotional written down rantings. But I do that only when I myself don't want to read them, because even though I can write mirrorscript correctly and easily without a mirror , I can't read what I myself just wrote that way without one.
I am Right handy, once I thought to start writing with my left hand and when I tried I was writing inverted letters, I thought that is obviously mistake so I started trying to write normally by my left hand and that resulted in me not able to write either inverted or normal letters perfectly by my left hand.
Good video; just real quick, saying someone has a “300 IQ” doesn’t really mean anything because of how profoundly far from the average it is (100), since IQ is distributed normally and uses the population’s average intelligence. If the standard deviation for IQ is 15, this means a “300 IQ” person is 13.3 deviations from the average, so plugging into the error function to determine their percentile we get [erf(13.3/sqrt(2))]/2 + 0.5) *100% = 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999.. (39 9’s!) percentile. Or, they are the smartest person out of a sample of a duodecillion. That number is literally trillions of times greater than the grains of sand on earth (~10^25). So does it really make sense to say someone’s IQ is that high when only 100 billion people have ever lived?
Honestly, that level of schooling at that young an age, I'd hazard a guess it was largely Pattern Recognition which is core for languages and math , which is why he'd fade into obscurity vs practical application & revolutionize sciences.
This deserves more likes. Just took a Stats class where we discussed this very thing, and I couldn't calculate that percentile fast enough to put down a comment like this. You're clearly drinking the biggest brain juice.
"Genius hits a target no one can see." I.m sure a genius out there never got the attention they deserve because of unconventional circumstances. I always believe the world could be 10,000 years more advance if instead of finding idols to worship we found geniuses and help them fulfill their potential.
If it were me, I would have a little pride about that... but I wouldn't be nearly as proud as I would of the fact that centuries later, my designs were implemented once humanity had the technology to build them.
I think you’ll find that he was probably the worlds most respected living painter during his lifetime and was highly sought after, so his paintings were probably already the most valuable and famous by the time he died.
@@punkoid76 Oh, I wouldn't dispute any of that. I'm just saying that if I were him, I would be more proud of how much I had influenced human advancement and technology, simply because I personally value those a bit more than art. Art is beautiful, but is largely a cultural thing that is done for enjoyment. And while making good contributions to art is definitely something to be proud of, i would be more proud (and surprised) that my designs were implemented with technology I never dreamed of. That my designs were so advanced, that they were literally centuries ahead of their time, and could not be utilized until we had tech far surpassing anything I had seen.
I do want to make a small correction to the video though that there isn't actually anything that special about the Mona Lisa despite it being as iconic as it is. In fact, the only reason why it got as famous as it did was because it was stolen a long while ago in 1911.
Sean Rallis I disagree, human ability to create art was the turning point in our evolution, it was the first thing to prove we are capable of abstract thought, which in turn led to written language and on from there the ability to disseminate ideas throughout society, don’t underestimate art as merely a “cultural thing”, after all Leonardo was only as important as he was first and foremost because of his artistic ability, which in turn led to everything else he achieved. As for the Mona Lisa being mediocre, give me a break.
I remember learning about da Vinci in one of my homeschool classes. I had a feeling this was going to be about him. He truly was way ahead of his time.
On top of all that amazing stuff da Vinci achieved, some historians also believe he had ADHD; myself included. As someone who both struggles with and simultaneously appreciates many aspects of my ADHD, I found a lot of his personal thoughts that he wrote in his diaries - as well as his often shifting but intensely focused/dedicated attention to so many diverse disciplines - EXTREMELY familiar. I don’t want to Psychoanalyse someone who’s been dead for hundreds of years, but reading his anxieties and struggles that hit so close to home made me really consider the possibility.
I have adhd too, and ocd. And safe to say the kind that creates the hyperactivity in such people as Leonardo. I have close to a hundred journals filled with stories, books, shit art, theories & hypotheses technically, lists, mathematical equations, proofing & conjectures, and so on. Difference between me and him though, is he has alien genius to his intelligence, whereas I’m lucky to be at highly intelligent 😅
I personally think he had some difference in his brain - whether by nature or by building connections while young, that allowed him to fully use both the right and left sides of his brain in a unique way. His being ambidextrous, the mirrored writing, the exceptional spacial awareness shown in his map-making etc all point to a left/right hemisphere difference that produced a uniquely exceptional mind.
maybe ADHD back then was simililar in nature to now, in that most people who SAY they have ADHD are just attention seekers who wish they were in some way unique, instead of the insufferable bores they reveal themselves to be by insisting we all know about their 'condition/disability/malady/curse' unlike Da Vinci, who probably never felt the need to point out his obvious peculiarities. comparing yourself to Da Vinci lol 😂 i'm curious, how many times today have you mentioned "your" adhd? whatever number you reply with (i doubt you'll reply with much more than a "😂 okay whatever buddy haha") is a lie. we will know, and you will know.
highly intelligent or insufferable bore? lol @@kerrywhitesstrangeworld9059 i'm suspicious about your ocd and adhd claims lol you fkrs (people who wish they were unique in some way, any way, GOD I WISH I WAS UNIQUE") are like vegans, can't even enter a room with strangers in it without declaring it "hey. hey! HEY!! OCD and ADHD over here, treat me accordingly!!!" lol you're right, i didn't have to comment, but i felt compelled to allow you the opportunity to say "hey fuck you man, you don't know me, or my massive struggle at being a human being in todays society, with my insurmountable issues with energy and preference for order!" i just described the entire human race. fuck off
@@eristonjuan No, he was the inspiration for the character "Merlin" in the Arthurian mythos and particularly in "The Once and Future King." He lives backwards in time so it only looks like he's a time traveller.
@@_hector__ We can't know for sure, those times and now are COMPLETELY different and simply not comparable--to try to compare what he did then and what he would do now is stupid. We simply don't know what he'd be like today and can't know, so it's just futile.
Yeah that's the thing, everyone is in big part a product of their time. If a time-traveler kidnapped mature genius Leonardo and dropped him off in the present time, he would probably do great things, once he gets over the initial shock. If baby Leonardo was brought here, he might grow up to be a completely different person, and we can't know if he will be better or worse...
@ He would turn out randomly but still retain his intelligence. DaVinci is a really curious human. He just wanted to paint better and accurately and ended up studying anatomy. If you gave him a him a chemistry set he would have discoverer a lot on his own. Give him military and ended up making tank designs lmao. So he would thrive in our generation 100% since he did all his thing without proper education. Give him the internet and he can be anybody he wanted to be.
9:40 Leonardo - he was amazing. Imagine drawing a bird flying by watching them fly so quickly. His drawings of the body and his research, his helicopter, his tank. You mentioned all of them. That bird’s eye view of the city is totally amazing. You’re talking about some things I never heard of. My god!!!! 🌷🌱
@@MandoRick1978 That's the correct sentence. I don't know why people are so jealous enough not to consider him as genius whilst they scrolling through TH-cam and wasting time on watching cat/dog videos contributing nothing compared to Leonardo Da Vinchi.
ThePapabear27 As they were listing out people I was thinking to myself "any list of genius that doesn't include Da Vinci is wrong"....and then he turned it over.
That's a tough comparison to make since we know so little about Archimedes. Did Archimedes also do art? We don't know. I think it's clear that he was stronger than da Vinci in mathematics, physics, engineering, and astronomy-- he actually work quantitatively. How much evidence is there of da Vinci working that way? I don't know, but he certainly didn't seem to come close to inventing calculus, like Archimedes did. And the accounts have Archimedes not only designing amazing inventions, but also his inventions being deployed, such as pulling ships out of the water, concentrating the sun's energy to form an energy weapon to ignite invading ships (if the accounts are true, of course). Given how the premise of this video supporting the da Vinci as the "greatest genius" is his work in many different areas, a lot of which survives, or at least accounts of it do, along how little we know about Archimedes, it's really tough to make a call. We have much more of da Vinci's work surviving than we do of Archimedes. In areas where one can make a comparison, Archimedes seems a stronger candidate, especially given how crazy advanced what he is claimed to have done during the 200's BCE.
It was possibly soul crushing knowing he will never be able to relate to any of his peers, contrary to popular belief, being in your early 10's without a childhood and in a university, is not fun.
I find the standardised IQ test heavily flawed and should be abolished completely. It can not possibly be very accurate. A new method must be created to get more accurate measurement of intelligence.
@@Delimon007 to my opinion, the IQ test merely shows the individual's ability to recognize, memorize, predict patterns well. They don't necessarily define the whole of the individual however they are good data nontheless, it is sad to see that a percentage of people would never get approved simply by born into a number, but then again you don't want someone holding the trigger when they don't recognize that it can kill.
Sir all your videos are so inspirational and the way you just explain things is so well I can't even think of a word because it's just that good you're going to do great things you are doing great things.. keep the inspiration alive my friend
I'll agree with you on the looks, but don't chalk up his mind to just genes. His approach to life was probably worth a lot more to how his brain developed throughout his life. Maybe you should read a translation of his journals. There's gotta be some gold nuggets on developing as a person in there.
@Juan Miguel Javier Because it means that no matter how hard they try they'll never be able to achieve it, since their parents elatives also weren't able. In one word it's jealousy. That being said, I agree it's not always just about genes. Your parents could have been Olympic Level gymnasts, but if you sit on your ass all day long watching tv while eating ice cream and cookie dough, there's no amount of genes that'll save you from eventually becoming fat as hell. People can have good genes, and that gives them a great headstart over others, but they still need to know how to take advantage of their natural abilities.
@Juan Miguel Javier Actually I agree with you, skill and genes both have their place. I may have not made myself clear there on my answer. When I said "they'll never be able to achieve", I was speaking about what some people that act like genes have nothing to do with it believe, not what's actually the truth. Besides genes are funny, just because you have genetics on your side it doesn't always mean you'll get it. I have 2 cousins, sisters with the same mom and dad so the same base genes, same academic route only one year apart from each other, one of them breezed trough school, little need to even study to get good grades, while the other younger one had to study to exhaustion to get good grades and even then her average grade was always a little below her sister. And they were sisters, same gene pool, same environment, same friends, they were pretty much inseparable growing up really, so almost all same experiences, one just got lucky 🤷♀
@@sara-sy3fc Is the ability to learn based on nature or nurture? There are many of us who have questions about life. There are very few of us who can find some answers.
@Juan Miguel Javier Judging by your second comment I think we're actually on the same page here, if you can believe that edit: well except for the stalemate part... I think the people with better genes might have more room to develop if the two are working just as hard, efficiently, and wisely. But that something like that shouldn't stop the other person from doing what they need to do to become their best self. Chances are someone with and IQ of 80 won't be able to catch up with someone with an IQ of 170. If they do, holy shit, this shit is absolutely revolutionary and how the actual f*ck? Excluding autistics (like my dumb ass) something like that is unheard of (I am not one of those autistics. I just score 125. Not that it matters all that much. I mean, IQ matters, just not as much as people make it out to. A rule of thumb? Goes a bit farther than that...) and if the person could explain how they did it would skyrocket the human race. I do not expect this to ever happen. edit 2: there's also cases like the guy who hit his head after getting in a fight outside the bar and could suddenly understand pi on a deep level, developed OCD, and saw lines coming out of a running sink like some kind of synethesia, so the brain's ability to rewire itself may overcome that in rare and extreme cases (of course, if someone with better genes than them had their brain rewired like that, maybe they'd perform even better. Or maybe their edge would go away. Maybe the person with more neurons will come out on top... even though neurons can make so many connections it kind of seems like a mute point except in the most extreme of extremes. Maybe the person who thought more deeply about the topic would show more results. I don't know. Maybe a way to develop something like that without brain damage is meditation, just a wild thought of mine, don't take it too seriously. I'm not a neuroscientist and I definitely wouldn't take some guru telling me they could help me too seriously. On second thought maybe I am some crazy stupid person. Feel free to berate me, my thoughts, and my opinions all you want. I'm worthless and probably deserve it. Maybe it'll wake me up from thinking like a f*ck*ng t*rd lately. People thought I'd be some kind of big shot scientist but I still live at my parents at 22, do nothing all day, and never went to college. K*ll m*. And f*ck you TH-cam, let me curse.
As a stem cell researcher I can tell you that defining intelligence has become highly important in stem cell biology. Some years ago, so-called “brain organoids” were made in the laboratory for the first time. You can think of brain organoids as “tiny brains in petri dishes” to some degree. We grow them from stem cells (which are made from skin cells) and it has been shown that they can control the contraction of muscle cells. Although they are unstructured and not considered as being conscious or intelligent there is an increasing number of ethical discussions given how fast this technology advances (I recently made a video about brain organoids explaining them in greater detail!). Let’s see if lab-grown intelligence will be a thing!
Who cares if they are going to be conscious can't you like turn it off or somehow take away it's existence? We need this to further improve our understanding of consciousness. Also, have you ever considered about connecting other brain organoids together? The result might be a bit interesting. Do the brains have some sort of segment that have one function and another segment for something else, like the right brain left brain, creativity and analytical thing
@Evan Schlaack ik you didnt ask me, but for the same reason any chemicals go through a transition: conservation of energy. With a vast amount of variables, space etc, there are bound to be some chemicals that replicate themselves as oppose to simply denature, this isnt due to any "consciousness" but for the fact that it required less energy to replicate. Everything decays. This is because there is an imbalance of energy in our universe. Nature itself is harmony, so the universe wants to go from a higher energy to a lower energy, so as it decays, there is no reason for it to use more energy in decaying. Everything follows the path of least resistance. So in the case of life, the path of least resistance is to replicate itself. Almost like an eddy current. We cause the decay of what is around us, then we decay, and we exist because we are the path of least resistance. Look up john conways game of life also if you have the time.
This is certainly intriguing and possibly groundbreaking! But as of now (and as a computer programmer) I'd say the day's most pressing question is where silicone-based AI will go and what will come from our ever-increasing dependency on our electronic-brained "slaves"....
I know this channel is called Thoughty2. But this guy looks like a train conductor from 1842.. Hence, "42 here." I love when he says it. It comforts me a lot. It makes me feel like a good sturdy soul is here for us. He's been there a long time, watching our society grow into more and more amazing times. He's proud of us. He's been watching and rooting since '42.
SUPRISE! I am the funniest YTer evah!!!! Just kidding, it was no surprise. Everybody knew already. HAHAHHAHA!!!! That was an amazing joke (it was real talk though). WAWAWAWAWA!!!! Good afternoon, dear linda
16:08 - ''Talent hits a target no one else can hit. Genius hits a target no one else can see.'' Talented people can do things that other people can do, just better than they can do it. You have people who play football, then you have talented footballers. Anyone can bang piano keys, but talented piano players create/recite beautiful music. Geniuses, however, do shit no one has thought or been able to do. Einstein, for example and his equation for special relativity. Someone else probably came up with the concept, but no one was able to come up with the correct theory the way he did. Einstein thought of it in a way no one was able to and then simplified it so that anyone could understand it and prove it.
Look how full of themselves these kinds of people are, even thought their so called "sketches" would be used at all. Well solving tough problems are quite alright i guess, its repsectable
Called da vinci as soon as I clicked on the video. I would personally agree, reading about him is just unbelievable. Just constant disbelief at how ahead of humanity he was
knowing a lot is just knowledge like people with PhD know a lot about their fields. Quantitatively, being smart or intelligent is how fast you learn new stuff. Which is why geniuses would learn 5 languages at age 12 or goto college as preteens etc
9:18 Da Vinci was my pick for the smartest person ever. He was a mathematician, scientist, philosopher, engineer… bro just loved learning. It’s like I’m always finding out about something new that he may have invented or discovered. I recently heard he had a highly functional understanding of gravity and he probably invented the ball bearing. Like wtf?
“Perfecting my technique for armpit farts” im dead asf yo this guy always comes up with the most randomest yet funniest remarks during his vids def one of my fav you tubers
I know I'm late to the party but I very much enjoyed this video @Thoughty2! It was really well done and I learned a lot. I was always under the impression that Einstein was the smartest ever and I learned a lot about DaVinci and others on that list including another great video of yours on Bobby Fischer! Neat to see just how far ahead of these "brilliant" people were many many years AFTER DaVinci. Again, Thank you for making it. 🙏
confucius doesn’t deserve to be on this list. there were a lot of ancient chinese thinkers like him, the only reason we still know and read his work is because he got lucky and it survives to this day
@@billybigbollocks298 I think you may have missed the point of the video. In that intelligence is a hard quality to quantify. So who's deserving and who isn't is subjective.
Ahhh, a very fun "what if?" mental exercise. However; though DaVinci's designs were indeed astute in many ways; material innovation wasn't anywhere close to supporting his (at the time) grandiose concepts. Still, it is fun to dream, just as the "what if" in regards to the Library Of Alexandria. So many countless "what if" scenarios in history. Alas, we are stuck here in this current shit show.
I absolutely agree he was the greatest genius to have ever lived. The only tragedy we endure to this day is never fully understanding how one man was so gifted.
Possibly because his parents included social skills in his upbringing. And maybe he had secret access to the voluminous content of the Vatican Library hidden away.
4:46 Thank you Sooooo much for stating to thousands of people that there are different kinds of genius!!!!! You can’t tell anyone that Shakespeare did not have genius in him!! Many artists are geniuses - Michaelangelo, of course, Da Vinci, Van Gogh, maybe DesCarte, Lincoln, Marie Curie, Franklin (?), Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, so many writers, artists, composers, politicians, medical doctors and scientists, ballet dancers, jazz dancers, etc. Maybe they’re not as much a genius as Einstein, but up there - and, since they’re not mathematically inclined, an IQ test or a Mensa test is so far from their kind of intelligence, that you can’t possibly measure it! Most Mensa people, I find are rather smug, but are there any of them who contributed anything like Tesla did!? There are, as we know, savants who are so good at one thing that can be called genius - like hear a piano concert and play the whole thing by heart and well; people who draw perfectly after looking at something once, like the landscape of Venice. There’s a woman out west here in America who is the smartest person ever at math (and she’s very nice, too). But has she developed anything like Steve Jobs did? So, yeah, there are different kinds of intelligence. 🥇🤸🏽♀️🎖️♟️🪄📚🎭🩰🎼🎤🎻🎬🎸🎹🎨☯️📱📡🔬🧬⚛️🦠☮️☢️🌷🌱
I love this channel because he just kinda says “it’s complicated”. And it really is. There’s a lot of thing we don’t really know about people or the universe
I totally agree on Da Vinci. What a man!!! I have an opinion, that the most important virtue somebody can have is curiosity. I think that all these great people had a lot of curiosity on how specific things worked and that's what pushed them to learn new things. But Da Vinci was such a Prodigy, that I really think we won't ever see another human being like him.
Best comment so far! Oh and guess what? MOST of Archimedes work was lost to history when Ceaser and the Romans accidentally burned the Library of Alexandria to the ground - incidentally most of Aristotle's work is also lost to history as a result of that incident as well. The Greeks probably contributed the most of any of the Europeans. Archimedes, many mathematical historians believe, discovered calculus centuries before Leibniz/Newton.
@@TheMeefive Uh, no they don't. Not a jesus that could walk on water. Give me a break. Maybe a rabbi, but not something otherworldly. Ain't buying the story.
Aren't the greatest minds always engineers? Biggest difference between engineers and scientists, is most scientists don't study in the realm of reality. An engineer does, so at some point an engineers work will come to fruition, a scientists isn't guaranteed and if it's not proven it's ignored
@@thegoodlydragon7452 you need adversity to even be able to realize your true intelligence. That's the reason so many great artists suck once they become rich/famous is they lose their drive to be great. The real question is how many people have been babied their whole life and never even got the chance to attempt to be great
Dude was smart enough to see that his whole life he was conditioned to do something he probably didnt want to. And all those expectations i cant even imagine how he handled those
You are to funny and remarkably informative at the same time, then you throw that mustache in the mix and your channel is pretty much a master piece...
Agreed, the first person I thought of was him. The second was Tesla, unfortunately as to of intelligence that both were, they both had one thing in common. They both got bored quickly and rarely finished anything they started.
@@randenrichards5461 it's probably hard to stick to one thing when your mind is birthing new genius ideas every day and you are excited as a puppy for each one of them
![ปฏิเสธไม่ไหว (Crush on you) - LIPTA feat. No One Else [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NBw1jF342vw/mqdefault.jpg)
Big thanks to Keeps for supporting the channel! Here's the site if you want to check them out! >
keeps.com/thoughty2
I thought Aaron (Thoughty 2 was the smartest person ever 🙆🏾♂️)
ok
@@mundea *Arran, but yes he is quite knowledgeable :)
y
been watching for years so im the cleverest hahaha! love kay uk x
I talked with Da Vinci in Assassin's Creed, he appeared to be reasonably smart yes.
@lygophile thx
He also didn't seem to be too happy in the Borgia's employ either. Yeah, I know him too. He made me some climbing gloves that shoot knives at people. Pretty cool dude.
Lmao
Lol
Da Vinky 😳
Leonardo puts the saying, "Jack of all trades is a master of none" to shame. This man perfected his approach to every field he touched
The student have now become the master...
People often don't know the second part of the saying.
Jack of all trades, master of none.
Often times better than master of one.
Elon puts this saying to shame as well
More like Jack of all trades, master of... Pretty much all of them
If Leonardo DaVinci were alive today I'd love to see him wrestling mma fighters into submission in the octagon
I clicked on this video to see who was the smartest person but all of a sudden I started worrying about hair loss in my 20's
if happens become a cue ball
Now that's a pretty smart comment
@@_You_Are_Not_Him_ Mind size : Mega
lol ikr... does anyone know if keeps actually works tho?👀
shave your head and embrace it. I have.
I couldn’t agree more. Painter, sculptor, scientist, mathematician, musician, dancer, conversationalist, and who knows what else. I’m so glad you chose him as the most intelligent. No-one deserves it more.
I do
I bet like Ben Franklin he had quite a hunger for the ladies too.
@@Mz3P1c no me me. I made bitcoin
@@robertjones1730 I think Da vinci was gay.
@@ArathyA1 please no, dont start with that
Da Vinci is the literal embodiement of 'You wouldn't get it'
Haha! On point!
Darwin is the most influential genius ever. Da Vinci mostly just screwed around with great ideas.
@@nerdstark9002 The question wasn't "who had the biggest impact". Darwin was no doubt a brilliant thinker and dedicated biologist who had a mindblowing impact on our understanding of the natural world. But he got there through huge advantages (being classically educated/from a wealthy background), but mainly worked incredibly hard by closely studying and observing species he kept and studied at home, and by going on expeditions and seeing the natural world for himself, challenging the thinking of the day.
But as Thoughty-2 said, Da Vinci was hundreds of years ahead of his time in terms of his engineering understanding and inventions, things which took incredible spacial awareness and understanding of physics - while also being one of the most talented painters of all time, and his understanding of human anatomy being so advanced that things he learned are only now being proven to be true! That's incredible, especially when you consider the lowly birth and lack of formal education he had. That certainly deserves the title of being a genius, he did far more than "screwed around with great ideas". How arrogantly dismissive.
Which is what I think when I look at that helicopter.
@@nerdstark9002 how was he more influential than Newton or Maxwell or Einstein?
My grandmother used to say I was the smartest and most handsome boy who ever lived. Take that Davinci!
Yeah.
I’m not sure but you and I might be related. My grandma said the same thing to me. I am guessing she never realized that the two of us would never meet and catch her feeding us the same line
Hell yeah! Gottem!
@@uniqueone2731 lol funny how you're meant to be the "unique one"
@@davidadegoke lol I tried to tell him
"I guess you guys aren't ready for that, yet. But your kids are gonna love it." - Leonardo da Vinci probably
You must be born in the early 80s 🤣
I just wrote something similar
Aaahhh!! Good ol Marty McFly.. gotta watch that movie again!
That would be the 50's.
Yep.. "Enchantment under the sea" dance. November 12, 1955. I miss those days...
It is important not to confuse “genius” for simply “well-educated”. Leonardo was a genius.
Being a polymath and understanding the information he was given and how to make use of it in practice is how he was so far ahead of anyone else, still to date!
Genius is the exact opposite of well-educated. Education leads to conformity and obedience.
@@mikemondano3624 not necessarily
While that is true, that doesn't apply here. Having taught himself those languages at such an age.
Let’s not forget Sir Issac Newton!
Another thing about Da Vinci is that his painting technique for the mona lisa was so complex that no one has been able to accurately reproduce it. Not only were his ideas just insane for his time, but his painting was also and still is revolutionary.
Michelangelo > Da Vinci as a PURE artist.
As an overall genius Da Vinci for sure.
Fun fact the Mona Lisa although impressive isn’t his best work nor is it the technique the hardest to master and also it’s been replicated in numerous works. It’s considered the best because he said so. Man was the greatest troll ever.
@@emandevoshan4727 true and people are still falling for it
da vinci and michaelangelo both didn't prefer painting to their other hobbies but ended up being considered the two best technically gifted painters ever.
Paint by Numbers - Solved
Growing up my mom said I was the smartest person ever. Are you calling my mom a liar sir?
amazing😂😂😂
I would like your comment but its at 69 likes
at least it's a smart comment.
@David Fullagar 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The fun thing with Da Vinci is that he *was* a painter to the core : most of the things he learned were in order to further his art.
… Now that’s badass.
The only reason he even studied those Cadaver's were because he wanted to correctly depict a human being's proportions in his paintings. The dude goes 110% on everything.
@@iskeptical5698 I don't think it does but he was probably like "well I've already started on this body, may as well keep going🤷♂️"
@@iskeptical5698 Human interest. Probably thought "while I'm venturing this endeavor might as well find out human anatomy while I'm at it". Just simply curious and applied himself to everything that caught his attention and pretty much sums up every genius or great discovery known to man "Curiosity". He was no shut in either and knew people and kept safe during all of those time so yeah he was all alone and the world was at his mercy and people back then just didn't pay attention like now. There's a person out there not using his 100% just coz he couldn't since the world right now has its standards and be at the right place at the right time at the right circumstances and that's just the world's RNG system "Random Number Generator aka RNGeesus".
@@iskeptical5698 for art that isn't a portrait? Lol.
@@JustSomeDude848 Exactly. We Hoomans have been doing that since forever and it all started when hoomans started manipulating its surroundings to bend to their will. From banging rocks to going to the moon to satellites that gives our phones signal and connecting everyone in the world. From using plants as herbs to BigPharma. From a simple cart to a freight train. From funny pictures in caves to the internet. Just plain ol hooman curiosity and being the clever monkeys we are we grow exponentially and if you think about it its pretty beautiful how mad we are with our pursuit to being close to godlike super powers and everyone wants to be a god "Everyone".
I read a book called Art and Physics in the 90's. This book did a great job of uniting these two seemingly disparate concepts. At the end of this rather long book it espoused the singularity of Leonardo DaVinci as proof of a man that can bring these two vastly different fields together. He was equally a great scientist and great artist, the likes of which we may never see again.
This deserves thousands more ‘likes’. You stated the case very distinctly and logically. The book sounds fascinating. But it seems you have been some sort of comedian to get thousands of likes.
Have a great day, sweetie :) 🤔🥸🌷🌱
@@feralblueeThank you for the compliment. I try to state my case succinctly when possible. It’s definitely a good read, especially if both subjects interest you.
Leonardo be like
other people: "what's that?"
Leonardo: " a robot"
other people: "what's a robot?"
Leonardo: "you'll get it in about 500 years"
Nice one bro
Thought Marco Polo made the first robot.
@@DJWESG1 itttsss caallleddd aaa jokee
@@Hisham5702 that's what she said..
@@DJWESG1 you make 0 sense my guy
“The smartest person ever is not who you think”
My thought went straight to DaVinci but I’ve been a super nerd since forever and I knew a lot about his work. DaVinci was mind blowingly creative. And Albert Einstein said “imagination is more important than knowledge” I do believe DaVinci had both.
TheLastScampi True for a nerd but a super nerd knows there’s always a possibility that there’s more to learn!
There is a flaw in E=mc^2
The smartest person ever was probably from sub-saharan Africa. Genetic series are used as an indicator to predict the probability of genius within a group. Orangutans have 3 genetic series, apes have 4, chimpanzees have 5, every human race has 6 with the exception of sub Saharan Africans with 9. The genetic diversity in 1billion Africans is more than the rest of the world combined. E.g the tallest people are the Dinka tribe from South Sudan and the shortest are the Pygmies from DRC. West African decent like Jamaicans are the fastest etc. Nigerians are the most educated immigrants in the US and they have the highest education attainment rate, outperming all other groups, according to the US Bureau of statistics. In terms of genius and intelligence, that extreme is likely to be found in sub-saharan Africa.
It went from "the smartest human" to "2 out of 3 guy's experience baldness". I'm not even halfway in!
Ahahaha I was confused at that moment realized he is promoting something 😆😆😆
It's an AD... smh
If the ad supports Thoughty2 making these videos I'm all for it.
Sellout!
@@aceyboy Nah :)
Brilliant reporting and analysis, and I am agreement with you.
You made no mention of Da Vinci as a sculptor, and though this may be the least developed of his media, it should not be ignored.
It was a blessing in disguise that it took so long for DaVinci's Codex to be found and studied. Back in his time he may have been deemed a heretic and executed before he could finish it. I have to agree, he was probably the most brilliant human being ever to have lived, and undoubtedly way ahead of his time.
@Studious Emma Are you a
"Grammar Nazi?"
@@catherineoneal1030 We are changing that particular locution to Grammar Trump.
George Washington is easily the greatest man that’s ever lived
He wasn't human. Well Homo sapiens at least.
He was a robot from another dimensión xD
The most intelligent human in history, by sheer statistical probability, was probably never educated, nor properly recognized.
What a stupid argument. It definitely isnt you at least 😂
(Jking)
yeah, some person in china or india that lived a thousand years ago
@@Travellahh How come? Jersey Devil is probably right. He was talking about intelligence aka iq, you don't learn that, you are born with it or not. Statistically, there probably were some poor people with +300iq who ended up as slaves to the rice fields... Or some monk, who didn't care about sharing his brilliance with others (zen masters). But yeah you are right, it's definitely not you since you can't think back in history...
Intelligence is not fully innate. It can be developed. It's not that there is some wunderkund lost in time that could trump all of the educated scientists and workers in history. The only way to get better is through hard work put into your field of interest. Those are the people who achieve things, not a wunderkund who "just knows things."
They might not have even been born yet.
Da Vinci is the smartest *recorded* human, who knows what has been lost, there could have been someone greater yet still unrecognized
I saw someone else say it, the probable most smart person to ever live most likely lived a thousand years ago, had no education and worked as a farmhand until death.
He was just one of the most iconic. And we really dont know if it was actually his knowledge or someone's knowledge he bought/stole.. In those times and now the rich mainly are the one's writing history (his-story) books.
@@sythesz The smartest person ever was alive 100,000 years ago and got stoned to death for sounding like a crazy person
@@surelock3221 seems legit
Guys don't you know who ramanuchan is dude he is so unrecognized he wrote two whole books of his theories which he couldn't explain as he died the ones which he solved was out of the world for any mathematical genius there he didn't even go to school
Imagine if we could bring Leonardo back and show him everything we have now. I think that while he'd be impressed, he'd also be simultaneously disappointed that flight wasn't achieved much sooner.
"It took you 400 years lol"
If Da Vinci came back to life, he'd be off finding new discoveries for the problems that humanity is faced with right now. He couldn't care less about satisfying his ego, I'm sure.
@@randolphpinkle4482 What?
@@randolphpinkle4482 yeah we would all be in flying cars with climate change solved
show him tiktok and he'd be crawling back to his grave faster than a proton who forgot about his boiled eggs
Davinci has always been one of my favorite people. You can watch hours and hours of information about him and still never be able to fully realize how incredible he was.
Factual statement right there.
I used to think I was smart, but then I realized I was just good at memorizing information.
me too man
That's the case for most of us in this, so called, era of "knowledge".
Such diverse attributes: Knowledge, Understanding and Wisdom.
I'm very good at weighing probability....Which....Makes me good at taking tests. I'm not going to say that I'm not smart....Just not as smart as my test scores would indicate.
I too feel that way. there's a difference between knowing a thing, and understanding a thing. I know quite a bit, I understand very little.
When translated from the ancient, mirrored Italian, his description of his tank read: "When this baby gets up to 88 miles per hour, you're gong to see some serious shit"
Underrated comment.
You lie! Italy uses metric!
@@emilandreasson9670 Lost in translation... Metric didn't hit Florence for nearly 300 years. In 16th century Florence Leo would have been measuring in Braccio's, which are about: (394mm = 1 Braccio)
Saying "When this bambino hits 357 Braccio's per hour...." does not have quite the same ring to it.
Except that they didn't use hours as we know it either. Back then the day was divided into four 6-hour blocks. I could do the math, except, this comment is already too long :)
Funniest comment 😂😂😂
@@agalah408 woosh
Nailed it with Da Vinci. I feel like any other answer would have been wrong.
I’ve always consider Leonado da Vinci the ultimate ”genius” after visiting an exhibition in the 80’s about his life and work.
And just as he, coming from a simple back ground, I sometimes wonder how many individuals we as humanity loses out on because children all over the world are held back at schools (or even missing out of it)?
What if we really as a world community saw to and guaranteed all children a proper education for them? I think we would be farther ahead as humanity and as a species too.
His background wasn't all that humble.
His father was pretty wealthy and even though Leonardo was born out of wedlock, he was still taken in and financially supported by his father.
Well, you know that will never happen. How can you control intelligent, well educated folks with polarizing fear and in-fighting like you see in many places today? I'm with you in the hope, I just don't see it happening due to the above and the fact that most modern society is far too indulgent to actually sacrifice anything to make a big change. Most folks are afraid to lose anything or face hardship willingly for change, which means things will be very hard to change as the majority will not take action without a strong impetus.
Studies have shown that I.Q is hereditary up to 87% then the nature and nurture argument comes in, which adds approximately 5 I.Q-points and the rest is speculative. So two stupid people have stupid children. Schooling wouldn't make a dent. That's why a man (in a country I cannot recall) with an I.Q of 40 is banned from having children!
I dunno .... drop a sheet of paper and watch its flight . The resistance to air alters as it zig zags toward the ground in an uncontrolled fashion . Do you consider it a pain in the arse or something to dwell over ? . Do you seek and find merit in working out the invisible forces that contort the paper on its trajectory ? . Do you consider the nature of paper and its woven construction , its edges , the shape of the paper , the weight ? . Do you see worth in pressing forward with what it gives that seems without value ? ...... well its absolutely pointless in 2020 to seek to create a finite understanding but in 1475 to scribe for prosperity would demonstrate genius given it was most likely considered by others but not memorialised . get to be the first = genius . I came up with the concept of propulsion in a unique and i8nteresting form whilst doing a course . Penned it and presented to be told the jet engine had already been done .... bollocks .... now if a simple lad from a fuck awful council estate can create this then we all have a degree of genius in us .... but not timing .
I remember reading somewhere that there are an estimated million+ children in Indian slums with an IQ over 125. Crazy to think who we might have missed out on due to poverty
If you go to the museum about Da Vinci in Firenze, Italy, you will be mind blown. I already expected him to be huge genius, but honestly it's difficult to describe how ahead of his time his thinking was.
Only if IQ was measured by how good a mustache looked.
To go all the way, maybe a beard too?
Mumbo Jumbo would have 99999 iq.
If only*
hitle
Then my equivalent IQ would be 1 because my beard can only grow a cm
Been watching you're channel for a good few month now. And just want to say your choice of topics have been eye opening and educational. Also your presentation of them makes it all the more enjoyable so I just want to say
"THANK YOU" and keep up the good work.
DaVinci genius was actually endless curiosity...the most curious person who ever lived
Nobody is more curious than my cat, and she hasn't invented anything.
MAGNUM-TV Be careful, it might kill the cat
@@magnum-tv1441 Also don't forget to close that box of poison that could or could not leak and kill your cat~!
People just despise immutable traits such as innate talent, they'd rather believe that they can have the same capability if they try enough, just a figment even though they may not be willing.
If Leo took an IQ test today, I think he'd ask, "Aren't there a few questions missing?"
Well put lol
This comment had 42 likes when I read it 👍
Whose Leo
@@alokrip9226 yours
@@philbofa what?
"I have offended both God and Mankind as my work did not reach quality it should have"- Leonardo Da Vinci during his death.
Wow. He said that?! Amazing.
How do you know he said? That who wrote it and when did he die and how did he?
He also said "SImplicity is the ultimate sophistication" I think
Ive heard he said “Some men are not of more use than as a machine used for turning food into shit”
Looking at you Olwydd
Noooo Leonardo we love you!!! :(
I've always loved the horsepower analogy regarding IQ in humans. The car with the most raw horsepower isn't always the car fastest around the track; especially considering the track in question. It will best other cars in a straight line but that's basically the only assurance.
IQ is similar in a way. It's a solid measurement of one's raw brain computation (horsepower), but the application of that horsepower varies greatly depending on the subject/task/problem at hand.
Genius manifests in many ways. IQ is only one of many metrics that can determine that potential.
An IQ test is really only useful to determine if someone is legally retarded or not. Anything above 80 doesn’t really mean anything especially how intelligent anyone is. The persons age also has a lot to do with it.
For what it’s worth, when I was in 7th grade (12), the school I attended wanted to make sure I wasn’t retarded and scheduled an IQ test with the state (extremely well funded school). It took an entire school week (around 40 hours total). Turns out that in 7th grade the state of Illinois determined my IQ was 142. Yet, I was failing 9 classes and couldn’t learn Spanish to save my life. Although those numbers really don’t mean anything (other than I wasn’t legally retarded and there was no excuse to be failing classes) at 34 years old, I’ve always been curious to see what my score would be now. Just for fun. IQ isn’t really a solid way to measure anything other than if someone is capable of comprehending basic reality enough to be a society-contributing adult.
Having said what I did, I sincerely wouldn’t put too much faith in IQ testing more than equating it to a parlor trick to annoy your friends.
I'd rather have Torque.
@@ryanwilson5936 I think you would probably be around 108
@@ryanwilson5936 The mere fact that you came to that conclusion without actually doing a thing to prove it shows your conclusion is worthless.
You, all by yourself, with not even the ATTEMPT to test it on yourself by retesting and seeing if your score varies by any huge margin (barring improvements in testing over the years and the known slight variation norms) just "knows" that IQ tests are useless... but all of science doesn't.
Brilliant.
@@dxfvgyhjh
Might as well be 810. It doesn’t matter.
I gotta say, Assassin's Creed 2 and Brotherhood taught me more than i thought. As Ezio you get to try out all those secret engineering projects yourself, and even find out what kind of people Cesare Borgia, Caratina Sforza and even da Vinci himself were.
That game made me so attatched to da Vinci as a friend, that whenever i see his name getting mentioned i get a little emotional and think "hey, that's my buddy, glad to know more people are recognising him :')" but then realise that he'd been dead for about 500 years.
sup the nostalgia bro
When AC was beautiful, and actually cared about historical accuracy :( the good days
@@yougotjohnwicked1755 true... Ezio a legendary character
Impossible to argue with that. Also for any 3d animators out there, he the reason we rig character models in a T pose by the looks of it haha.
2D animators as well. I used to be one
Bro has been asserting dominance on us beta humans for centuries from the grave.
HAHA!!! When you announced that you were reading off a list of the Greatest Geniuses in History, the 1st one I thought of, and was SURE would be on there was da Vinci!
Now, before I listen to the rest of your show, I know his genius was estimated at 220. Maybe more?
I started studying da Vinci at 11. How I found him, or what began my fascination with his genius was when my 6th grade teacher told my class to write a book report.
I had no idea? So, I went to the library, closed my eyes tight, and raised my arm, and fingertips as high as they could reach. Feeling a spine, my hand landed on one book, which I then, pulled down from the shelf.
I was shocked and in awe, that I had pulled down by chance, the biography of Leonardo da Vinci.
Opening what would be an Aladdin treasure chest to my senses, my eyes, read as one starving 30 days on, would devour food, relishing the knowledge newly discovered.
This man, held every important title possible on more subjects than any human in history, and spearheaded inventions that would have catapulted humankind from the 15th century to the 21st.
I found myself attempting, at every chance, to tell everyone in earshot of the Greatest Genius, to my eyes, that had ever lived
Ever since, that notion of unearthly, intrinsic brilliance, had never been effaced from my soul.
Thanks for actually picking someone! Not “leaving it up to us to decide”
Leonardo went missing for several years and has always puzzled me as to where he went and what he did in that time 🧐 maybe one day we will find out.
he definitely went on a bender
#TheAbyssStaresBack
Allegedly he went to a cave somewhere (literally) and saw some “entity” and it’s actually hidden in some of his paintings
@@kristopherhardy3302 so what you're saying is he prolly did psychedelics
He can here to 2020 and binged one piece, and started to idea for doctor stone
This was so interesting! But I feel sorry for the guy with the 300 IQ whose parents had him on a forced learning program from the time he was born. He should have been allowed to become whatever was in him to become, like Leonardo de Vinci was. Comparing the "learning system" of each is sadly ironic. It certainly didn't seem to do the guy or anyone else any good.
William James Sidis *did not* have an IQ of 250-300. That info was made up by his sister and mom with no evidence that sidis ever took an in test, never mind scored that high. But undoubtedly, he was nonetheless extremely intelligent and a child prodigy.
Well, even if he was a genius, it doesn't mean he'd accomplish anything. Motivation and curiosity are a big factor in accomplishments across all fields of education. This is what makes Da Vinci a genius. He was curious about everything and he was motivated enough to research about what he wanted to know. It wouldn't take a huge genius to make all the discoveries he made. In fact what you'd call a genius today could theoretically have done the same as Da Vinci back then. In todays world there's just no possibility for one to excel at everything at a degree that you would be considered a genius amongst all of them.
That is why saying that Da Vinci is the smartest human EVER is controversial. In fact, it's not possible to say that about anyone, because "smartness", intelligence and genius are no measurable things.
@@ATH-camCommentator it was estimated by experts dude
@@rudolfdirks9253 I think you're missing the point. With no formal education, Da Vinci was able to put to paper ideas that were only brought to life centuries later. Ideas that medical doctors of today use. It's almost unimaginable. He was a starting point, which is difficult to do once, yet he did it multiple times.
@@ux1-15 I think you're missing my point. I do understand fully that he was a genius in a way like Einstein, who had a different way of thinking that could revolutionise the field he was working in. However what I was saying is something different. We don't know if he is the greatest genius ever, because a genius of his caliber could easily walk among us, but not be recognised, because every field of knowledge is way ahead of what Da Vinci had.
To put it in other words: if there is a person smarter than Da Vinci, he will never be recognised as that, because he can't excell in all fields across the board. Da Vinci was able to do that, because of curiosity and his genius. But it doesn't exactly mean that he was actually smarter than maybe even your average high-schooler today (intelligence has a lot to do with knowledge and how much knowledge you can recall at any given point).
Ambidextrous person who can right normally with the right and mirrorscript with the left reporting. In my case, I have never bothered to train myself , in fact it just turned out that I just spontaneously started writing mirrorscript whenever I picked up the pencil with the left hand. My mom reports i could write both ways right from the beginning, around when I was 2 or so. It's like Harry Potter speaking Parseltongue. It just automatically happens if I try to write with my left hand. Any language which I can write with my right, even if you freshly teach me one right now, just gets automatically laterally inverted by my brain when I attempt it with my left hand. I can also write properly with my left hand when I am consciously intending to. The only reason I write mirrorscript is to impress people because it's fucking cool to be able to do something so unique without even trying, and at times to make sure no one doesn't bother to read my emotional written down rantings. But I do that only when I myself don't want to read them, because even though I can write mirrorscript correctly and easily without a mirror , I can't read what I myself just wrote that way without one.
I am Right handy, once I thought to start writing with my left hand and when I tried I was writing inverted letters, I thought that is obviously mistake so I started trying to write normally by my left hand and that resulted in me not able to write either inverted or normal letters perfectly by my left hand.
K buddy, ure smart. Dont need to justify tht
Good video; just real quick, saying someone has a “300 IQ” doesn’t really mean anything because of how profoundly far from the average it is (100), since IQ is distributed normally and uses the population’s average intelligence.
If the standard deviation for IQ is 15, this means a “300 IQ” person is 13.3 deviations from the average, so plugging into the error function to determine their percentile we get [erf(13.3/sqrt(2))]/2 + 0.5) *100% = 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999.. (39 9’s!) percentile. Or, they are the smartest person out of a sample of a duodecillion.
That number is literally trillions of times greater than the grains of sand on earth (~10^25). So does it really make sense to say someone’s IQ is that high when only 100 billion people have ever lived?
Something tells me iq tests were not a thing back then. It’s a shitty estimate
Honestly, that level of schooling at that young an age, I'd hazard a guess it was largely Pattern Recognition which is core for languages and math , which is why he'd fade into obscurity vs practical application & revolutionize sciences.
Thank you so much for this comment
He was pretty smart- he stayed under the radar lol
This deserves more likes. Just took a Stats class where we discussed this very thing, and I couldn't calculate that percentile fast enough to put down a comment like this. You're clearly drinking the biggest brain juice.
"Genius hits a target no one can see." I.m sure a genius out there never got the attention they deserve because of unconventional circumstances. I always believe the world could be 10,000 years more advance if instead of finding idols to worship we found geniuses and help them fulfill their potential.
Not to mention our evolution being stunted by religious dogma....
Alejandro - I totally agree!
@@royyoung9355 Losing the Library at Alexandria tops my list of "if only's"
Not the elite game, bruh.
@@royyoung9355 say *no* to religion kids. Every. Single. Time. Ideologies also tend to be... limited, like religion.
If only he knew that centuries later his paintings would be the most valuable and famous ones.
If it were me, I would have a little pride about that... but I wouldn't be nearly as proud as I would of the fact that centuries later, my designs were implemented once humanity had the technology to build them.
I think you’ll find that he was probably the worlds most respected living painter during his lifetime and was highly sought after, so his paintings were probably already the most valuable and famous by the time he died.
@@punkoid76 Oh, I wouldn't dispute any of that. I'm just saying that if I were him, I would be more proud of how much I had influenced human advancement and technology, simply because I personally value those a bit more than art. Art is beautiful, but is largely a cultural thing that is done for enjoyment. And while making good contributions to art is definitely something to be proud of, i would be more proud (and surprised) that my designs were implemented with technology I never dreamed of. That my designs were so advanced, that they were literally centuries ahead of their time, and could not be utilized until we had tech far surpassing anything I had seen.
I do want to make a small correction to the video though that there isn't actually anything that special about the Mona Lisa despite it being as iconic as it is. In fact, the only reason why it got as famous as it did was because it was stolen a long while ago in 1911.
Sean Rallis I disagree, human ability to create art was the turning point in our evolution, it was the first thing to prove we are capable of abstract thought, which in turn led to written language and on from there the ability to disseminate ideas throughout society, don’t underestimate art as merely a “cultural thing”, after all Leonardo was only as important as he was first and foremost because of his artistic ability, which in turn led to everything else he achieved. As for the Mona Lisa being mediocre, give me a break.
I remember learning about da Vinci in one of my homeschool classes. I had a feeling this was going to be about him. He truly was way ahead of his time.
*Leonardo da Vinci in a Nutshell*
- basically made his life and the world like a game of Minecraft
69
in creative mode
Hahahaha
@@78_mary31 Maybe he used mods
Hes like a damn data miner with how ahead of time he was
The smarter you become the more you realise you know very little at all.
Ooga booga
-Oog
@@tamoo6028 I concur
It’s the worst
@@genny1814 nice flex 😂
Rob Myers I’ve heard that same belief. That the smartest don’t focus on what they know, but seek answers to what they don’t. (Along those lines).
"Hey, 42 here"
Its getting harder and harder to tell the difference
Foughty too hear
When will these comments stop
Thank you!
@@joeldeakin2003 literally never. I make it my mission.
On top of all that amazing stuff da Vinci achieved, some historians also believe he had ADHD; myself included. As someone who both struggles with and simultaneously appreciates many aspects of my ADHD, I found a lot of his personal thoughts that he wrote in his diaries - as well as his often shifting but intensely focused/dedicated attention to so many diverse disciplines - EXTREMELY familiar. I don’t want to Psychoanalyse someone who’s been dead for hundreds of years, but reading his anxieties and struggles that hit so close to home made me really consider the possibility.
I got adhd and u r correct
I have adhd too, and ocd. And safe to say the kind that creates the hyperactivity in such people as Leonardo.
I have close to a hundred journals filled with stories, books, shit art, theories & hypotheses technically, lists, mathematical equations, proofing & conjectures, and so on.
Difference between me and him though, is he has alien genius to his intelligence, whereas I’m lucky to be at highly intelligent 😅
I personally think he had some difference in his brain - whether by nature or by building connections while young, that allowed him to fully use both the right and left sides of his brain in a unique way. His being ambidextrous, the mirrored writing, the exceptional spacial awareness shown in his map-making etc all point to a left/right hemisphere difference that produced a uniquely exceptional mind.
maybe ADHD back then was simililar in nature to now, in that most people who SAY they have ADHD are just attention seekers who wish they were in some way unique, instead of the insufferable bores they reveal themselves to be by insisting we all know about their 'condition/disability/malady/curse' unlike Da Vinci, who probably never felt the need to point out his obvious peculiarities.
comparing yourself to Da Vinci lol 😂 i'm curious, how many times today have you mentioned "your" adhd? whatever number you reply with (i doubt you'll reply with much more than a "😂 okay whatever buddy haha") is a lie. we will know, and you will know.
highly intelligent or insufferable bore? lol @@kerrywhitesstrangeworld9059 i'm suspicious about your ocd and adhd claims lol you fkrs (people who wish they were unique in some way, any way, GOD I WISH I WAS UNIQUE") are like vegans, can't even enter a room with strangers in it without declaring it "hey. hey! HEY!! OCD and ADHD over here, treat me accordingly!!!" lol you're right, i didn't have to comment, but i felt compelled to allow you the opportunity to say "hey fuck you man, you don't know me, or my massive struggle at being a human being in todays society, with my insurmountable issues with energy and preference for order!" i just described the entire human race. fuck off
Leonardo davinci doesn't count cause he was a time traveler that got stuck in the past.
I'd rather say he smashed the astral world and picked some good stuff from out there
@@merlin8046 no, def time traveler
@@eristonjuan No, he was the inspiration for the character "Merlin" in the Arthurian mythos and particularly in "The Once and Future King." He lives backwards in time so it only looks like he's a time traveller.
Leonardo is in Time Quest anime too
I wonder why there isn't a D/D for him
Who else was here when the dude had no mustache?🙋♂️
yes, I vaguely remember... It was before humans decided to record their history.
We knew him when he was just a clean shaven lad.
Back in the good old days when he was making RIF. I am still hopping that he will bring that back :(
@ValorHd Do you mean when his face was not colonised?
Leave it at 42 likes. Lol
Imagine Da Vinci being born today and be able to access the internet
He would've become addicted to instant gratification like us and not had as much motivation to pursue his projects, probably
@@Mein_KampfyChair I highly disagree
@@_hector__ We can't know for sure, those times and now are COMPLETELY different and simply not comparable--to try to compare what he did then and what he would do now is stupid. We simply don't know what he'd be like today and can't know, so it's just futile.
Yeah that's the thing, everyone is in big part a product of their time. If a time-traveler kidnapped mature genius Leonardo and dropped him off in the present time, he would probably do great things, once he gets over the initial shock.
If baby Leonardo was brought here, he might grow up to be a completely different person, and we can't know if he will be better or worse...
@ He would turn out randomly but still retain his intelligence. DaVinci is a really curious human. He just wanted to paint better and accurately and ended up studying anatomy. If you gave him a him a chemistry set he would have discoverer a lot on his own. Give him military and ended up making tank designs lmao. So he would thrive in our generation 100% since he did all his thing without proper education. Give him the internet and he can be anybody he wanted to be.
9:40 Leonardo - he was amazing. Imagine drawing a bird flying by watching them fly so quickly. His drawings of the body and his research, his helicopter, his tank. You mentioned all of them. That bird’s eye view of the city is totally amazing. You’re talking about some things I never heard of. My god!!!! 🌷🌱
Let's be real, Leonardo was a time traveler from the future, stuck in the past...
RareTV lmaooo probably. This dude made a helicopter
Close enough.
Or maybe everyone else is so fucking stupid that DaVinci seemed like a time traveler.
He could be walking among us right now...
@@MandoRick1978 That's the correct sentence. I don't know why people are so jealous enough not to consider him as genius whilst they scrolling through TH-cam and wasting time on watching cat/dog videos contributing nothing compared to Leonardo Da Vinchi.
Seeing as my first guess was Leonardo da Vinci, and my second was Archimedes, it's exactly who I thought.
ThePapabear27 As they were listing out people I was thinking to myself "any list of genius that doesn't include Da Vinci is wrong"....and then he turned it over.
Sir Isaac Newton was only mentioned once, and that was in passing.
That's a tough comparison to make since we know so little about Archimedes. Did Archimedes also do art? We don't know. I think it's clear that he was stronger than da Vinci in mathematics, physics, engineering, and astronomy-- he actually work quantitatively. How much evidence is there of da Vinci working that way? I don't know, but he certainly didn't seem to come close to inventing calculus, like Archimedes did. And the accounts have Archimedes not only designing amazing inventions, but also his inventions being deployed, such as pulling ships out of the water, concentrating the sun's energy to form an energy weapon to ignite invading ships (if the accounts are true, of course). Given how the premise of this video supporting the da Vinci as the "greatest genius" is his work in many different areas, a lot of which survives, or at least accounts of it do, along how little we know about Archimedes, it's really tough to make a call. We have much more of da Vinci's work surviving than we do of Archimedes. In areas where one can make a comparison, Archimedes seems a stronger candidate, especially given how crazy advanced what he is claimed to have done during the 200's BCE.
300 IQ but didn't contribute anything, just like most of us. This guy is strangely relatable.
It was possibly soul crushing knowing he will never be able to relate to any of his peers, contrary to popular belief, being in your early 10's without a childhood and in a university, is not fun.
I find the standardised IQ test heavily flawed and should be abolished completely. It can not possibly be very accurate. A new method must be created to get more accurate measurement of intelligence.
@@ivanchu8415
I mean, my IQ is just 120-130 but I can't relate to anyone around me as is. Cannot even fathom how he must have felt.
@@Delimon007 At least you are not full of yourself, so that's alright.
@@Delimon007 to my opinion, the IQ test merely shows the individual's ability to recognize, memorize, predict patterns well. They don't necessarily define the whole of the individual however they are good data nontheless, it is sad to see that a percentage of people would never get approved simply by born into a number, but then again you don't want someone holding the trigger when they don't recognize that it can kill.
Sir all your videos are so inspirational and the way you just explain things is so well I can't even think of a word because it's just that good you're going to do great things you are doing great things.. keep the inspiration alive my friend
Bet the smartest human is playing video games in his childhood bedroom on social services
Nah if they showed any sign of intelligence at the levels of da Vinci for his times. They’d be in a high school class or college at the age of 9-13
@@TheMagicPencilG You already lost the bet, the smartest human will consider schools crap
Bet he’s good at gaming tho
Bet
@@ST_gamingshorts Yes I am (joke). Am I joking about being a good gamer, or am I joking about being the smartest person alive?
I’m with you. Have always thought he was the pinnacle of single human achievement. He hit the genetic jackpot.
I'll agree with you on the looks, but don't chalk up his mind to just genes. His approach to life was probably worth a lot more to how his brain developed throughout his life. Maybe you should read a translation of his journals. There's gotta be some gold nuggets on developing as a person in there.
@Juan Miguel Javier Because it means that no matter how hard they try they'll never be able to achieve it, since their parents
elatives also weren't able. In one word it's jealousy. That being said, I agree it's not always just about genes.
Your parents could have been Olympic Level gymnasts, but if you sit on your ass all day long watching tv while eating ice cream and cookie dough, there's no amount of genes that'll save you from eventually becoming fat as hell.
People can have good genes, and that gives them a great headstart over others, but they still need to know how to take advantage of their natural abilities.
@Juan Miguel Javier Actually I agree with you, skill and genes both have their place. I may have not made myself clear there on my answer. When I said "they'll never be able to achieve", I was speaking about what some people that act like genes have nothing to do with it believe, not what's actually the truth. Besides genes are funny, just because you have genetics on your side it doesn't always mean you'll get it. I have 2 cousins, sisters with the same mom and dad so the same base genes, same academic route only one year apart from each other, one of them breezed trough school, little need to even study to get good grades, while the other younger one had to study to exhaustion to get good grades and even then her average grade was always a little below her sister. And they were sisters, same gene pool, same environment, same friends, they were pretty much inseparable growing up really, so almost all same experiences, one just got lucky 🤷♀
@@sara-sy3fc Is the ability to learn based on nature or nurture? There are many of us who have questions about life. There are very few of us who can find some answers.
@Juan Miguel Javier Judging by your second comment I think we're actually on the same page here, if you can believe that
edit: well except for the stalemate part... I think the people with better genes might have more room to develop if the two are working just as hard, efficiently, and wisely. But that something like that shouldn't stop the other person from doing what they need to do to become their best self. Chances are someone with and IQ of 80 won't be able to catch up with someone with an IQ of 170. If they do, holy shit, this shit is absolutely revolutionary and how the actual f*ck? Excluding autistics (like my dumb ass) something like that is unheard of (I am not one of those autistics. I just score 125. Not that it matters all that much. I mean, IQ matters, just not as much as people make it out to. A rule of thumb? Goes a bit farther than that...) and if the person could explain how they did it would skyrocket the human race. I do not expect this to ever happen.
edit 2: there's also cases like the guy who hit his head after getting in a fight outside the bar and could suddenly understand pi on a deep level, developed OCD, and saw lines coming out of a running sink like some kind of synethesia, so the brain's ability to rewire itself may overcome that in rare and extreme cases (of course, if someone with better genes than them had their brain rewired like that, maybe they'd perform even better. Or maybe their edge would go away. Maybe the person with more neurons will come out on top... even though neurons can make so many connections it kind of seems like a mute point except in the most extreme of extremes. Maybe the person who thought more deeply about the topic would show more results. I don't know. Maybe a way to develop something like that without brain damage is meditation, just a wild thought of mine, don't take it too seriously. I'm not a neuroscientist and I definitely wouldn't take some guru telling me they could help me too seriously.
On second thought maybe I am some crazy stupid person. Feel free to berate me, my thoughts, and my opinions all you want. I'm worthless and probably deserve it. Maybe it'll wake me up from thinking like a f*ck*ng t*rd lately. People thought I'd be some kind of big shot scientist but I still live at my parents at 22, do nothing all day, and never went to college. K*ll m*. And f*ck you TH-cam, let me curse.
As a stem cell researcher I can tell you that defining intelligence has become highly important in stem cell biology. Some years ago, so-called “brain organoids” were made in the laboratory for the first time. You can think of brain organoids as “tiny brains in petri dishes” to some degree. We grow them from stem cells (which are made from skin cells) and it has been shown that they can control the contraction of muscle cells. Although they are unstructured and not considered as being conscious or intelligent there is an increasing number of ethical discussions given how fast this technology advances (I recently made a video about brain organoids explaining them in greater detail!). Let’s see if lab-grown intelligence will be a thing!
Human brain cells are "small humans", no kidding.
Who cares if they are going to be conscious can't you like turn it off or somehow take away it's existence? We need this to further improve our understanding of consciousness.
Also, have you ever considered about connecting other brain organoids together? The result might be a bit interesting.
Do the brains have some sort of segment that have one function and another segment for something else, like the right brain left brain, creativity and analytical thing
Can stem cells get rid of stretch marks?
@Evan Schlaack ik you didnt ask me, but for the same reason any chemicals go through a transition: conservation of energy. With a vast amount of variables, space etc, there are bound to be some chemicals that replicate themselves as oppose to simply denature, this isnt due to any "consciousness" but for the fact that it required less energy to replicate. Everything decays. This is because there is an imbalance of energy in our universe. Nature itself is harmony, so the universe wants to go from a higher energy to a lower energy, so as it decays, there is no reason for it to use more energy in decaying. Everything follows the path of least resistance. So in the case of life, the path of least resistance is to replicate itself. Almost like an eddy current. We cause the decay of what is around us, then we decay, and we exist because we are the path of least resistance. Look up john conways game of life also if you have the time.
This is certainly intriguing and possibly groundbreaking! But as of now (and as a computer programmer) I'd say the day's most pressing question is where silicone-based AI will go and what will come from our ever-increasing dependency on our electronic-brained "slaves"....
Your content is always so good! I find myself laughing multiple times in each of your videos. Cheers!
I know this channel is called Thoughty2. But this guy looks like a train conductor from 1842.. Hence, "42 here." I love when he says it. It comforts me a lot. It makes me feel like a good sturdy soul is here for us. He's been there a long time, watching our society grow into more and more amazing times. He's proud of us. He's been watching and rooting since '42.
Title: it's not who you think
Smartest person ever: exactly who I thought
Exactly!
I noticed the 2nd smartest wasn't on the list at all ;( Archimedes
@@justmyopinion4101 yh
Y2
Yup, disappointing video lol
"World's Greatest Mustache"
You are correct sir. 👨
SUPRISE! I am the funniest YTer evah!!!! Just kidding, it was no surprise. Everybody knew already. HAHAHHAHA!!!! That was an amazing joke (it was real talk though). WAWAWAWAWA!!!! Good afternoon, dear linda
Are you OK?
16:08 - ''Talent hits a target no one else can hit. Genius hits a target no one else can see.''
Talented people can do things that other people can do, just better than they can do it. You have people who play football, then you have talented footballers. Anyone can bang piano keys, but talented piano players create/recite beautiful music. Geniuses, however, do shit no one has thought or been able to do. Einstein, for example and his equation for special relativity. Someone else probably came up with the concept, but no one was able to come up with the correct theory the way he did. Einstein thought of it in a way no one was able to and then simplified it so that anyone could understand it and prove it.
Einstein Was Asked How It Felt to Be the Smartest Man Alive and He Replied That They Would Have to Ask Nikola Tesla
Supposedly he was being sarcastic?
@Yakgaha Integration but think about this in nikola teslas time ever one said he was crazy but now there starting to see how right he was
@Yakgaha Integration I just feel like einstein really isn't that smart even though his ego may have told him otherwise compared to tesla or in general
@Yakgaha Integration what makes you say that they are closer then I may think?
He was being sarcastic einstein said that Newton was the smartest person ever.
“We’ve got top men looking at his notes.”
“Who?”
“Top men.”
They wear top hats.
th-cam.com/video/Fdjf4lMmiiI/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/WI98XqkiYcE/w-d-xo.html
We meet again,, doctor Jones.
To understand how great Leonardo's sketches were, try to come up with a design for a machine that would be used 500 years later.
Done. At least 5 of them. I'm going to start building each, when my app starts profiting
Im making a design for the wall of vulcano power generator and also designing houses for Pluto colonisation. Yeah, 500 years it is.
Look how full of themselves these kinds of people are, even thought their so called "sketches" would be used at all. Well solving tough problems are quite alright i guess, its repsectable
@Ajay: That's damn well put man :)
200
Called da vinci as soon as I clicked on the video.
I would personally agree, reading about him is just unbelievable. Just constant disbelief at how ahead of humanity he was
Leonardo da Vinci in a nutshell: Why specialize in one of these when you can just do ALL OF THE ABOVE?
All or nothing...
He also invented plastic but back then no one really needed or used it so he scrapped it
I can do ALL of those things too. Though admittedly not very well.
I also invented ideal sunbed positioning.
Yes 🤦♀️
Not music. That would probably be too time consuming. He probably also didn't know very many other languages as it wasn't necessary.
1:33 world record book - "you cant just declare yours as the best moustache"
Thoughty2 - *smirks* "or can i....."
Being smart doesn't mean knowing a lot, it means knowing what to do with what you know to find out more to solve more problems.
Ok
No... Being smart actually does mean knowing alot.. intelligence is what makes you useful with your knowledge.
Wow, you just cracked the code that many scientists and philosophers for the the past centuries have been trying to solve. Just wow...
knowing a lot is just knowledge like people with PhD know a lot about their fields.
Quantitatively, being smart or intelligent is how fast you learn new stuff. Which is why geniuses would learn 5 languages at age 12 or goto college as preteens etc
Intelligence is the combination of experience, knowledge, tactics, problem-solving, planning.
9:18 Da Vinci was my pick for the smartest person ever. He was a mathematician, scientist, philosopher, engineer… bro just loved learning. It’s like I’m always finding out about something new that he may have invented or discovered. I recently heard he had a highly functional understanding of gravity and he probably invented the ball bearing. Like wtf?
“Perfecting my technique for armpit farts” im dead asf yo this guy always comes up with the most randomest yet funniest remarks during his vids def one of my fav you tubers
I was once the youngest person who ever lived
No, technically everyone was at some point the same age as you
You've been to places very very VERY few people had been in, for example your house,
@Sherry He said EVER lived, not youngest person ALIVE
You probably not but me I was born 24 December it's the 3 rarest day to be born I think
The correct way to say this is "I was once the youngest person alive".
I was like "Why is he bringing up Einstein and Mozart's hair?"
And then I realized what was coming....
well played 42, well played
Clever lol
Actually it's thoughty2🤓
@Giovanni Cambranes
Yikes. Missed that joke.
@@giovannicambranes229 r/wooooooooooooooooòooooooooooooooooooòooooooooòòooosh
@@giovannicambranes229 Error 404; joke not found
I know I'm late to the party but I very much enjoyed this video @Thoughty2! It was really well done and I learned a lot. I was always under the impression that Einstein was the smartest ever and I learned a lot about DaVinci and others on that list including another great video of yours on Bobby Fischer! Neat to see just how far ahead of these "brilliant" people were many many years AFTER DaVinci. Again, Thank you for making it. 🙏
that's a cool user pic where's that from
@@dxfvgyhjh Me? Just a silhouette of me in my hat & hoodie a long time ago. You're the first to ever bring it up! Glad you like it! Thanks!
I got a feeling that he's just a time traveler.
"he's JUST a time traveler" wooah, sorry there bud, let me just tell the time traveler he's a damn dumbass
I just saw him the other day
@@grunt9131 that's Leonardo DiCaprio..
sorry buddy, impossible to time travel to the past
@@luisgarciaosorio7382 No, your right, he probably did invent it anyway.
Confucious say: “Man with hand in pocket, feel cocky all day long.”
www.trees-and-lambdas.info/matushansky/confucius.html
Confucius also say” Women who fly upside down have Crack up!
confucius doesn’t deserve to be on this list. there were a lot of ancient chinese thinkers like him, the only reason we still know and read his work is because he got lucky and it survives to this day
Confucius must’ve been expert pocket pool player “man who practices pocket pool
by himself, will have no need to shoot shot on a trick”
@@billybigbollocks298 I think you may have missed the point of the video. In that intelligence is a hard quality to quantify. So who's deserving and who isn't is subjective.
Imagine if Leonardo's design were put into work then, how far more advanced we would have been now
Same thing for nicola tesla a ton of his
work wasseized by the cia an is still classified. A
N a bunch of his work is still way above mathematicians.
@@Dipti303 Gonna need some sources on that, chief.
Still not advance enough to stop your kind from bombing in public places.
Ahhh, a very fun "what if?" mental exercise. However; though DaVinci's designs were indeed astute in many ways; material innovation wasn't anywhere close to supporting his (at the time) grandiose concepts. Still, it is fun to dream, just as the "what if" in regards to the Library Of Alexandria. So many countless "what if" scenarios in history. Alas, we are stuck here in this current shit show.
I love how you work in your ads to your vids.
I absolutely agree he was the greatest genius to have ever lived. The only tragedy we endure to this day is never fully understanding how one man was so gifted.
Possibly because his parents included social skills in his upbringing. And maybe he had secret access to the voluminous content of the Vatican Library hidden away.
@@richNfit4life You need to read his biography. He was an illegitimate child who ran free with little schooling.
When I saw the title of the video I was like "What? Someone greater than Leonardo?"
"you mean the blue ninja turtle, right?"
- sidis
@@killah18723 oh course we're talkint about leonardo
I thought it was Terence Tao or magnus carlsen
I think curiosity is the key to genius and imagination is the key to invention
What meaningless tripe.
I think you're wrong
i think i like the smell of my own farts but no other ones. And i find that interesting
My cat is curious. LSD leads to imagination.
Ehhhhh, kinda? Like, you could have the key but be too daft to understand which door to put it in...
4:46 Thank you Sooooo much for stating to thousands of people that there are different kinds of genius!!!!! You can’t tell anyone that Shakespeare did not have genius in him!! Many artists are geniuses - Michaelangelo, of course, Da Vinci, Van Gogh, maybe DesCarte, Lincoln, Marie Curie, Franklin (?), Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, so many writers, artists, composers, politicians, medical doctors and scientists, ballet dancers, jazz dancers, etc. Maybe they’re not as much a genius as Einstein, but up there - and, since they’re not mathematically inclined, an IQ test or a Mensa test is so far from their kind of intelligence, that you can’t possibly measure it! Most Mensa people, I find are rather smug, but are there any of them who contributed anything like Tesla did!? There are, as we know, savants who are so good at one thing that can be called genius - like hear a piano concert and play the whole thing by heart and well; people who draw perfectly after looking at something once, like the landscape of Venice. There’s a woman out west here in America who is the smartest person ever at math (and she’s very nice, too). But has she developed anything like Steve Jobs did?
So, yeah, there are different kinds of intelligence. 🥇🤸🏽♀️🎖️♟️🪄📚🎭🩰🎼🎤🎻🎬🎸🎹🎨☯️📱📡🔬🧬⚛️🦠☮️☢️🌷🌱
Thoughty2 (18:26 in this video): You cant compare different disiplines.
Leonardo (1400s): I'll just crush all of them then.
I love this channel because he just kinda says “it’s complicated”. And it really is. There’s a lot of thing we don’t really know about people or the universe
I totally agree on Da Vinci. What a man!!! I have an opinion, that the most important virtue somebody can have is curiosity. I think that all these great people had a lot of curiosity on how specific things worked and that's what pushed them to learn new things. But Da Vinci was such a Prodigy, that I really think we won't ever see another human being like him.
I would also name Archimedes as a contender. His genius was definitely far ahead of it's time as well.
Best comment so far!
Oh and guess what? MOST of Archimedes work was lost to history when Ceaser and the Romans accidentally burned the Library of Alexandria to the ground - incidentally most of Aristotle's work is also lost to history as a result of that incident as well.
The Greeks probably contributed the most of any of the Europeans. Archimedes, many mathematical historians believe, discovered calculus centuries before Leibniz/Newton.
Jesus the Christ. No one comes close.
@@TheMeefive We have proof Da Vinci existed. Where is the proof of your god?
@@jillibeens57 Most credible historians, religious and secular, agree that Jesus existed.
@@TheMeefive Uh, no they don't. Not a jesus that could walk on water. Give me a break. Maybe a rabbi, but not something otherworldly. Ain't buying the story.
The way this man does his sponsors... now that's some sort of genius.
I know right
It's pure genius
Binod
Well he already had that recognition. If only we could turn back time and see wtf is he doing.
of all your episodes this one is exceptional. Thank you for all your effort
I hope someone could really inform Sheldon that really the greatest mind was an Engineer
Aren't the greatest minds always engineers? Biggest difference between engineers and scientists, is most scientists don't study in the realm of reality. An engineer does, so at some point an engineers work will come to fruition, a scientists isn't guaranteed and if it's not proven it's ignored
Polymath*, artist, engineer, architect, anatomy expert, but yes not a scientist.
@@devarshraval4692 lol fair enough
Idk about that.. they make A-L-O-T of mistakes in drawings.
Complementary video: th-cam.com/video/rp8hvyjZWHs/w-d-xo.html
When I saw the top 10, I thought “Why in the world is Leonardo nowhere to be seen”. I’m happy you think so too
Yes
I almost won the 3rd-grade spelling bee, but I quit so I wouldn't get bullied in 4th grade and got bullied anyway. lol
That proves other people’s point. Really smart people, aren’t always accepted socially. Ted Kazinski for example.
When will we realize that demeaning intelligence doesn't just fuck over the smart kid, but the whole of society?
Congratulations , u played urself
@@thegoodlydragon7452 you need adversity to even be able to realize your true intelligence. That's the reason so many great artists suck once they become rich/famous is they lose their drive to be great. The real question is how many people have been babied their whole life and never even got the chance to attempt to be great
Great, great great video! Thank you Thoughty2!
Davinci be like: i am limited by the technology of my time
Howard stark reference?
@John Barber I be like
Dude was smart enough to see that his whole life he was conditioned to do something he probably didnt want to. And all those expectations i cant even imagine how he handled those
Well iq can sometimes cope with it but yeah that's a hell
*Me:* **Reads Title**
*Also Me: So It's NOT Nikola Tesla*
IKR?!?!
You are to funny and remarkably informative at the same time, then you throw that mustache in the mix and your channel is pretty much a master piece...
Should be called 'The smartest person ever is exactly who you think'
👏
Agreed, the first person I thought of was him. The second was Tesla, unfortunately as to of intelligence that both were, they both had one thing in common. They both got bored quickly and rarely finished anything they started.
Newton?
@@randenrichards5461 Maybe they knew it would work, but it was too far ahead and better to invest the energy in something different.
@@randenrichards5461 it's probably hard to stick to one thing when your mind is birthing new genius ideas every day and you are excited as a puppy for each one of them