@@afiffarhati4580 The peasants were shocked, everyone else was surprised because the emperor admitted to being human and not because they actually believed he was a god. He was effectively giving up a huge amount of his cultural significance to the Japanese people so it was a bit of a shock all around.
@@giuseppemassari9970 He did retract it after the US occupation in Japan ended. Its like that guy who get punked out by a bully, wait for him to leave and then he whispers, "yeah, you better run." 😄 Japan is just living in denial if that's the case lol
British in 1945: ,,So, new government was formed, right?" Polish Underground State: ,,I don't know, it seems like Soviets formed a puppet government in our country..." British: *Government is government! Now get the hell outta here!* And that's how Poland lost WW2.
US : We need to make sure Germany doesn’t stir up troblues again. *East Germany exists* US : Correction. We need to make sure West Germany get all kind of gold and money in the world just to beat their communist neighbour. 40 years later France, UK, Italy, Spain, All of Eastern Europe : Can we get more rights in EU Parliament? Germany : Shut up and go feed me more money and trades.
@@MP-vc4nu Honestly I think West Germany would of ended up in an economically better position anyway just due to the East being much more closed off, and the communist nation currency being nearly worthless outside of eastern bloc nations (Though the East German mark was probably the best of them). Pouring as much capital in to the west as western countries did though certainly helped build the juggernaut that is the German economy. Fun fact, the UK was opposed to German reunification just because of how strong a unified German economy would be, something they were proven correct about.
@@DrewPicklesTheDark The UK are a bunch of pussies. “Oh my god Germany is a economic powerhouse must wage war on them. Also give them some war reparations too!”
Crazy. Hirohito during his reign witnessed the rise of the Japanese Empire, Great Depression, Mukden Incident in 1931, invasion of China in 1937, World war II and the empire at greatest extent, 2 atomic bombs, post war recovery, Olympic opening in 1964, Rise of anime, economic growth and almost the entire cold war dying in 1989, just as the cold war was ending.
Also, there was a strong feeling that the removal of Kaiser Wilhelm in Germany in world war 1 contributed to a feeling of resentment amongst the German people, and a feeling that the Weimar Republic were a bunch of traitors whom had abandoned their rightful leader, which fostered an environment that could easily be exploited by the Nazi party in their rise to power. The feeling was that they had made a mistake there and were determined not to make the same one again. Hirohito would be able to keep the Japanese people on side in a way that a completely new regime would find impossible.
The Weimar Republic was run by a bunch of democratic socialist who royally managed to ruin the German economy, thereby leading to more extremist Socialist to take over. It has nothing to do with the kaiser
The difference is, that Wilhelm II was becoming more unpopular as the war dragged on and as soon as Max von Baden declared his abdication, he just feld the country, without fighting for his throne or openly saying that Max von Baden was wrong. He didn't put up any resistance. This seemed to the conservative Germans like cowardice and treachery, so there were no positive feelings about Kaiser Wilhelm II after 1918. Furthermore, his eldest son the crown prince was also rather unpopular
hirohito should've been tried and executed for the war crimes that his country committed and depose their monarchy like what happened to germany after world war 1, sparing hirohito from war crimes is like letting adolf hitler or benito mussolini go away from their war crimes unpunished
Except the Allies didn't remove Wilhelm. The German people did that themselves. There was a revolution in the streets, and the military refused to support him, so he abdicated and fled the country. This was on November 9, before the armistice was signed two days later.
@@kitchenaidwhiskeyjonesthe US has helped unpopular monarchs take/retake their thrones before. We tried it with the Soviets during their civil war and we did it with the Iranians by supporting the Shah. (Ironically, that's the core reason why those two countries dont like us today😅)
The other thing to keep in mind is that the Japanese Emperors have seldom had any real political power for over a thousand years. Between the Fujiwara Regents, the Shoguns, and then the various ministers and generals post Meiji Restoration, there have always been others running the show and telling the Emperor what he should do. As for the Showa Emperor himself (Hirohito), he actually expressed misgivings on several occasions with the way the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy were conducting themselves and the wars they were starting - including the attack on Pearl Harbor. The army ignored him and did whatever they wanted anyway, so the emperor eventually gave up trying - at least until the cabinet was deadlocked on whether or not to surrender at the end of the war. After the second bomb was dropped, he finally spoke up as the tie breaking vote and insisted on surrender. And for the first time in his reign, the generals and admirals actually listened to him and did what he said. Edit: Since people are still, years later, dropping comments trying to correct me, let me put this here. I live in Japan. At the time of this edit, I have lived here 15 years. That is 15 years of studying Japanese history. 15 years of visiting the places where these events happened and listening and/or reading first hand accounts from the people who were there. And while I may not claim to be a subject matter expert, I have very good friends who definitely are. So before you reply to this comment, go read all of the other replies below. Or just don't reply, as I am tired of repeating myself every few months because some new internet random thinks they know more about Japanese history than the writer who is actually there.
It's actually damned unfortunate too. Hirohito could've stopped Japan's involvement in the war if he was more outspoken than he is. As the public viewed him as a living god he could've ran Hideki Tojo out of office and gave his anti-war sentiments. All the millions of needless death could've been stopped if a single, individual man simply and firmly put his foot down against the imperialist ambitions of his empire.
@@OriginalGazGoose Except, not really. There were several times that he did try to put his foot down and even an incident where he straight chewed out senior military officials. The military then promptly ignored him and did whatever they wanted anyway. And Hideki Tojo didn't even become Prime Minister until well after the wars had started, and even then only after all of the other non-military Prime Ministers had either been assassinated or run out of office by the army. It is interesting how Tojo is often held up as some sort of evil mastermind who single handedly lead Japan into the war and all of the atrocities that were committed by the Japanese troops. In reality, by the time he became PM in 1941, the war in China had been going on for years and planning for the attack on Pearl Harbor was already well underway. Don't misunderstand, he was responsible for allowing a lot of the atrocities committed by the Imperial Japanese troops and was definitely part of the problem. But he was NOT the absolute dictator who pushed Japan to war that a lot of people seem to think he was. And it wasn't just the Generals and Admirals in Tokyo either who blatantly ignored the will of the Emperor and the government. The staged attacks on railways in Manchuria (Manchukoku as the Japanese called their puppet state there) and the incident on Marco Polo Bridge were all done after the army brass in Tokyo specifically ordered the commanders there to NOT do anything to start a war in China. The local commanders were even more ultra-nationalist than the rest and did it anyway. Once the deed was done and the war was started though, the generals in Tokyo decided it was easier to save face by signing off on the whole thing after the fact than it would be to admit that they couldn't control their troops. And when the civilian government condemned the attack on China, young army officers started assassinating government ministers. If you are interested and want to actually know what you are talking about, I suggest actually taking the time to study and learn about the rise of Japanese militarism and how the Japanese government functioned - or really failed to function- in the 1920s and 1930s. It is fascinating reading, and would be a hilarious comedy of errors and egos if it didn't ultimately lead to atrocities, war crimes, and so much death. Surprisingly, a good place to start is the recent series Extra History did on Japanese Militarism. Their channel can be pretty hit or miss on some of the stuff they cover, but this particular series is really well done and, while a bit oversimplified, it does a great job of showing how the entire system in Japan during the 1920s and 30s was hopelessly broken to the point that no one person could have fixed it. Not even the Emperor himself.
There was a very strong military class. They tried to prevent his radio speech surrendering from being broadcasted and attempted to assassinate the prime minister (I forget whether they succeeded). It was really Tojo who was in charge.
They even kept basically the same system of government. They just renamed the Imperial Diet the National Diet, replaced the House of Peers with the elected House of Councillors, and put in provisions in the constitution to stop the military and the emperor from taking over
Hindsight being 20/20. Truman was an idiot in my opinion. He removed MacArthur because he wanted to invade China. The years between the bombs being dropped on Japan and the Rosenbergs giving the secrets to a nuclear weapon to the USSR was the most wasted opportunity in world history. I know it sounds horrible but imagine a world where we listened to General Patton and wiped the USSR and communism off the face of the Earth
@@adambomb5381 I agree that the nukes were not necessary and Japan had been attempting to negotiate a surrender for over a year. However nuclear bombs are a good thing because if America and her allies had attacked the USSR it would have started a war more terrible than the last.
0:43 it should be noted (and emphasized) that keeping the emperor wasn't Japan's only condition for surrender, at least pre-nuking. Japan also wanted to try their own war criminals instead of handing them over to the allies (ie, letting said war criminals get off scot-free) and keeping their pre-war territory, such as Korea and Taiwan.
It's also expressly written into the Japanese post war constitution that the Emperor can have no say whatsoever over the government. The Diet led by the Prime Minister holds all power. While this is generally the norm in constitutional monarchies very few actually put it into law with one of the few other examples being Sweden. Technically Queen Elizabeth II could dissolve parliament and rule with her reserve powers (although she would then be deposed) in a way that the Japanese Emperor simply cannot
@@alexbennett7018 you're right, I didn't know that, just looked into that. She could still take over as a dictator like Charles I (obviously she wouldn't), but with parliament still in session she could be easily voted out and a Republic declared, just like what happened to Charles.
I mean, it all comes down to popularity. If she's way more popular than the parliament she could in theory force her powers and get away with it, although I doubt she'd ever do something like that.
@@RafitoOoO Yes I agree. For example, in WWII if Germany had installed a puppet government like they did in France, the people would have stayed loyal to King George VI. The King would likely have had to flee to Canada or the US, but if the allies later retook London they would have reinstalled him as King and the people would have sided with him over the puppet government. Thankfully, they never surrendered so we never had to go through that
The emperor in Japan didn’t had any power in the government before the Meiji era, the Shōguns ruled like prime ministers while the emperor was just a spiritual leader, It’s pretty much the same now, but with democracy.
@BathTubMongrel Mussolini didn't change sides - at the beginning of Italian Civil War he was taken out of power and later arrested. Then Germans liberated him, put on leadership of Italian Social Republic (the German puppet state), and then shot after trying to flee Italy😉
@@yibithehispanic If I remember right, the US only said Japan couldn't declare war (they could still fight defensive wars and take part in military action). When Japan redrafted their constitution, it was included and the Japanese military was changed to a smaller purely defensive force under the name of the JSDF (Japanese Self Defense Force)
If the Americans had replaced Hirohito with his son. Then Akihito, the former emperor who is still alive and abidicated last year, would have ruled Japan for 74 years
@@PHX787 Yeah basically, and it's not really uncommon for young folks in royalty to be the king/emperor, even if they're too young to rule, and if that's the case, they have a caretaker by their side until they reach a mature age in most cases, I guess. Considering the fact that the Japanese emperor never really had any true power, both pre-war and after it, it wouldn't be too hard to replace the emperor, but it would be just more work, and also the people need to be convinced about it, I guess.
can we just take a minute to appreciate their consistency and quality of these uploads? looking forward to a video each week is one of my favourite things. if you see this, thank you for everything, Mr History Matters.
@@kalyka98 Unlike Japan in WWII, one of president Wilson's condition after WWI was for german Kaiser to abdicate... german government leaders such as Ludendorff, Hindenburg and von Baden were monarchists and they did not want to accept that and thus Ebert was willing to lead the nation after Kaiser. Until late 1919 german people were still in favor of Kaiser except radical left lead by Liebknecht and Rosa Luxembourg.
Funny thing is, the German Republic was rather accidental. Kaiser Wilhelm abdicated and fled on 9 November, leaving a government headed by Max Von Baden and Friedrich Ebert, of the social democrats. Ebert wanted to preserve the monarchy in the form of some other member of the house of Hohenzollern, and waned Max Von Baden (the popular Chancellor) to act as temporary regent, but Max didn’t think he was up to it and declined. The German Republic was proclaimed by a minister from the reichstag balcony, during a lunch he was having with Ebert. Ebert briefly went to the bathroom, and the minister seized the opportunity, rushed out onto the balcony and declared a republic before a crowd which was assembled outside. When Ebert returned from the bathroom he was utterly furious, but the damage was done
It is very simple. After the post-WW1 chaos in Germany and Russia, MacArthur (or someone above him in the chain of command) realized that keeping Emperor Showa in power would give Japan a keystone around which the new government could be built. The decision worked out spectacularly.
Ummm. Actually the citizen would never say this and if one did the rest of the populace would think it an affront to the nation. The emperor wouldn’t need to order his decapitation, the citizen would be peer pressured into committing Seppuku for his disrespect. 🌸 🗡
@@Ake-TL Never watched that anime, but it works even if it is not a reference. His actual hobby was marine biology. Plus, seconding what alus nova said, pretty much spot on in regards to the deep reverence your average Japanese of the time had for the Emperor.
Fun fact: Hirohito favored peace over war and didn’t want to start a war, but the military controlled the country and so they started the war in Asia, although Hirohito protested. The military worshipped Hirohito but had total control over Japan.
2 possible future video ideas: Why wasn’t Italy trialled like the other axis powers after WW2? Why are China, France, Russia, UK and the USA the 5 only Permanent members of the United Nations Security Council?
The allies in WWII were the Republic of China, the Soviet Union, the British Empire, the French and America. Thus they got to be the national that set up the UN and they (or their successor nations) got to be permanent members on the one UN panel that had anything resembling power and have a veto over it's decisions.
And the Italian resistance made a chance where they were able to conquer against Benito's regime, because of this, the West didn't want to punish Italy due to their actions during ww2, and they're aware that a Communist revolution would happen if they punish the Italians harsh.
@@LazyAndFabulous A communist revolution nearly happened as it was. I'm not sure there was a more active and politically powerful communist movement in Western Europe than the one in Italy. Had some of the complicit parties been weakened by trials, the communists might have taken a foothold in Italy, making the Greek communists even more likely to take power. NATO could have been strategically much weaker if the Eastern Med was effectively under Soviet control.
There are several factors why Italians weren't put on trial for war crimes: 1) The overall amount of war crimes committed by Italy were not on the scale of those committed by Germany and Japan. Not even close. 2) Most of the war crimes attributed to Italy occurred in the context of African colonialism. Some African countries like Ethiopia and Libya wanted to try some Italians for crimes against humanity, but the British did not allow that to happen since they feared that it might set a precedent that could be used against them by their own colonies in the future. 3) The allies wanted to make sure that Italy was on their side in the upcoming Cold War. Harsh treatment of Italy might have lead to Italy becoming communist. This was especially important to the British, who, for the sake of their empire, wanted to ensure control of the Mediterranean. Passing through the Mediterranean is a much faster route from the UK to India than going around Africa. As a side note, this is also the reason Churchill was so keen on making sure Greece didn't go communist. 4) None of the major victors of WW2 (USA, USSR, UK, France, China) really held much of a grudge against Italy after the war. The Soviets wanted to see the Germans punished and the Chinese wanted to see the Japanese punished, but it doesn't seem like the people living in the big countries that won WW2 felt much of a desire to get revenge on Italy.
It was more like they went back to the pre-Meiji state of things. There was the Emperor, but all the power lay with the Shogun (MacArthur). They even called him Shogun while he was in command.
It's crazy to see photos and videos from the 1980s of Ronald Reagan meeting Emperor Hirohito, who died in 1989, the end of the Cold War. The guy literally lived through most of the 20th Century and was emperor during the most pivotal parts of it! I'd say our government liked him very much by the end of his reign, we love Japan!
Historically speaking, Hirohito was a believer of a constitutional monarchy and rarely intervened into politics while the constitution kind of allowed exclusive rights. There was a debate on how to interpret the part which said that “the execution of the emperor’s rights are done through advice of the ministers”, whether the advice was a requirement or not. Hirohito mostly followed the decision of the parliament with some exceptions. 1. When ultranationalist group assassinated ministers in an attempt to bring back power to the emperor, to which the emperor ordered total subjugation of the coup, and 2., when Japan declared surrender. Legally speaking, he had all the rights and powers to prevent the war from happening. But what he did was just approving anything decided by the parliament. That’s the debate of whether he is responsible for the war.
yeah, following the decision of parliament pretty much full of militant, power-hungry and war-mongering people, seems like a good idea to me.... that's like for US president to follow the advice of industrial military complex, oh wait...
Nice comment Many Western people simply think that Hirohito was an equivalent to Hitler or Mussolini, but he was not He has expressed his will to avoid war with US to his ministers (and basically everyone in the Imperial Conference agreed), and they failed I would argue that if Hirohito had the courage to take charge, the war with China and the US would be avoidable, especially the latter
And the fact that Hirohito does not even try to revert some of the rules that are being imposed by the new constitution proves that Hirohito does not interested in ruling the country
@@mc95323 He might have had the legal power to do so, but he did not have enough people on board with the idea to move in that direction and keep power. At least that is the likely explanation.
And that's more or less how the Japanese Self Defence Force (Postwar Japanese military) was formed, with the Korean War going on, the US released they couldn't protect Japan while fighting in Korea, so the Japanese were authorised to have some military capability (initially called "national police reserves" and "coastal safety force") before becoming the JSDF.
@@casuallatecomer7597 which... became one of the most powerful naval forces in the world lol, powerful enough to challenge the chinese navy head on if it came down to it.
@@blackpowderuser373 Not really, the JMSDF was an _offshoot_ of the Japanese Coast Guard early on, however, the modern JMSDF and Japanese coast guard are under different government ministries.
Im glad you made this video. Because of the history they teach in schools now does not lead to an as obvious conclusion as it was when i was in school. Good Job and keep Rocking!
Something that should be noted is that they did force Hirohito to be in a picture standing next to General MacArthur (who was much taller), which was then published in the newspapers to show the Japanese people that he was not the divinely chosen leader of Japan. From this point on the Emperor of Japan was merely a constitutional monarch with little actual power, so in a way he was removed from power.
0:07. Running through a field saying "I'm Alive." Considering what happened to Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, Yamamoto, and Roosevelt, truer words have never been spoken...
The other thing to note is that Hirohito was essentially a figurehead during WW 2. The true power was Tojo and the military It's the same reason why Italy's king wasn't removed after WW 2.
Victor emmanuel III wanted peace but he was a constitutional monarch so had limited powers mussolini gived Victor emmanuel titles as king of Albania and emperor of Ethiopia the prince becomes leader of itallian east Africa
The sight gag of (insert historical figure here) skipping through a meadow because they (insert specific success here) might just be my favorite running gag on TH-cam...
0:11 Hirohito did not think it was “a swell idea” and was very reluctant to involve japan in war against the west. It was chiefly the Japanese military and his own brother that pushed him towards aggressive foreign policy. In fact he specifically put Tojo in as PM so the military could take the blame for Japan’s warmongering.
Thanks, was looking for comment fixing that blunder said in the video. I know it's always "simplified" but Hirohito wasn't in favour of the war, or at least not with the USA. But - sadly, he didn't really have that much power in the government and was merely a stamp, signing military decisions and acts.
That was the idea that US government sell to the whole world that Hirohito is relunctant to go to war to against the west but personally I do not believe that
I’m always so impressed by your graphics, the range of topics you cover and the amount of information you manage to fit into 3 minutes History Matters, keep up the great content 👌
@@ihateyankees3655 Franco was a rational dictator, like Pinochet and Soeharto. They did a lot of bad things, but are smart enough not to invade other country to deny their enemies any justification to topple the regime. The opposites are Hitler, Mussolini, Saddam Hussein, and Soekarno, their regimes are short-lived.
Really that should Emperor Showa as that was his chosen Imperial name Saying Emperor Hirohito would be like a Japanese academic talking about the reign of King Albert when discussing King George VI.
It was done on purpose, as part of McArthur's efforts to demote the emperor's image as a living god, to ensure that *everytime* western media talked about the man, they'd use his birth name rather than his regal name. Likewise the relaxed pose you see McArthur adopted in the photo he took with the defeated emperor: again, to show Hirohito's humanity and destroy any pretension of godliness
@@AndresJames54 not quite since you know Albert and George are different people. A closer comparison would be calling pope Francis by is secular name Jorge
@@luisss3929 Yes, George VI was christened Albert. He chose the name George, after his father, upon being crowned. In the same way that Edward VII's birth name was David.
@zain mudassir he nearly caused a nuclear attack (not war, because you know, anybody except US had nuclear weapons at that time) because he didn't underestimate chinese communists, and today we see the results...
@@Niko-1303 Nuking communist China would assure the USSR's retaliation against the US, and I surely hope you're not advocating for a nuclear holocaust just because modern China is a dictatorship.
@@velcranoxofficials9970 Many Generals would not have bothered, especially in that time trying to learn about a culture so diametrically different from them.
0:10 is kind of an asterisk. From what I’ve read, the Emperor thought it was a bad idea to go to war, but since the military basically had control over the government, (reminiscent of the Shogunate) he couldn’t do anything to stop the momentum and just hoped for the best.
No, he didn't. Emperor Hirohito was concerned by the lack of success of the occupation in Manchuria, and he scolded the military leaders about it. General Sugiyama later wrote that Hirohito asked him if China is a vast country which is difficult to control, then how would Japan control the Pacific Ocean which is much bigger. In Admiral Nagano's own words: "I have never seen the Emperor reprimand us in such a manner, his face turning red, and raising his voice."
"Remained on the imperial throne, until his 10 years was cut short by a minor case of mortality" that is the greatest catchphrase so far in your channel
Fun fact: The emperor did not know about the invasion of manchuria, or pearl harbour, nor the Japanese declaration of war on China and the US respectively, until after they happened. The Japanese ministers had a policy of 'ask forgiveness rather than permission' for things the empreror would not like (even if they did ask and he said no, they would often to it anyway). So they just did what they wanted and 'asked' him afterwards if it was okay: if he said yes - great, if he said no - it was already done. He also very rarely said no, he wasn't particularly interested in ruling the country and did not see it as his place to overrule the ministers - as far as he was concerned they were in charge not him. Finally, he was very regretful and even distraught over the fact he did not do more and stand up to the government during the war. He said in his dairy multiple times that he was horrified of what he had learned his people had done during the war as tactics and treatment of POWs.
Americans: Lets liberalise japan and remove the emperor Sees Eastern Germany... Americans : | Hirohito:You could not live with your own failure... Where did that bring you?Back to me.
I’ll guess I’ll have to do some re-reading of emperor Hirohito. When I read about him I got the impression that he was hesitant about declaring war on the USA, it was mostly the military generals that wanted to go through with it. I remember reading a book years ago that he read a poem in front of his military generals that went along the lines of “why can’t we all just get along”. Then again this was a Book I read more than 10 years ago, and probably more research has been found.
That poem literally means "All people within the world are brothers, however the wind and waves don't stop.“ It could be also understood as "We love peace, but now there are so many threats that we have to fight." And the poem was written by his grandfather Mutsuhito, for the Japan-Russia war in which Japan won a great victory.
Apparently Hirohito wasn’t just pressured to abdicate by foriegn demands, but also members of the Imperial Family such as Yasuhito, Prince Chichibu (his eldest younger brother), Nobuhito, Prince Takamstsu, (his 2nd younger brother), and Prince Naruhiko Higashikuni (the Emperor’s “uncle”, although that is not actually how he is related to Hirohito) to allow another Imperial Prince, not necessarily Akihito to become Emperor.
In reality, MacArthur knew that having a cultural head who hates the USSR was gonna help them become allies, so when he wrote the constitution and made the democratic government, Hirohito was still given cultural leader.
I think it is also important to note that it was a bit harder to prove the emperors involvement in much of the war. As every general etc took the fault for themselves and also because the power relation was a bit weird
I remember early 1989 when he died. Our ( Australian) government ordered flags at half mast but received a massive backlash ( Australia had many troops suffer in Japanese POW camps) and within a few hours had to rescind the order. There was even 44 years later incredulous disbelief that he wasn't executed as a war criminal.
Strange. If you look at Pew research polls about opinions on Japan by country, generally the whole world has an overwhelmingly positive view of Japan but Australia is one of the highest cherishers of Japan. 81% favorable.
@@highadmiraljt5853 Considering the Pew Research center was founded in 2004, yes... Also I don't think anyone needs to do a survey during a world war, everyone is going to hate each other lol
hardly without US naval support so any foothold they made would be something the us "allowed" at best for him a communist Hokkaido would have been a thing during operation downfall and agreed by the US to have an Ainu puppet state as reward.
@@HipFire1 False, the red navy could easily make it across. And the Soviets had already taken the higher up Islands and were literally a few days away from invading the mainland before calling it off. The soviets could have easily invaded inner japan no matter what the US thought. Look up the invasion of the Kuril Islands.
@@americancommunist6076 the soviets took ridiculous casualties taking the kurils for such a small task and the biggest plan the soviets had was taking northern Hokkaido at best. there was never going to be a soviet invasion of the Japanese islands unless the US gave them direct support in case operation downfall went south (which was basically the plan B).
The King of Italy was left in place as well. He abdicated after the war in favour of his son, and they were ousted when the monarchy was abolished altogether by popular referendum in 1946.
What an incredibly nuanced peace of history I never knew about. If we invade the soviets invade? That is just incredible and I can’t wait to look this up more
Removing emperor would end up in another war just like if someone try to remove the british monarch. Furthermore in Shinto the emperor is a living deity
Some Japanese officers decided to continue fighting even after its military manpower was depleted and the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki When the emperor decided to surrender, the Kyūjō incident happened. It happened on the night of 14-15 August 1945, just before the announcement of Japan's surrender to the Allies. The coup was attempted by the Staff Office of the Ministry of War of Japan and many from the Imperial Guard to stop the move to surrender. They attempted to place Emperor Hirohito under house arrest, using the 2nd Brigade Imperial Guard Infantry. They failed to persuade the Eastern District Army and the high command of the Imperial Japanese Army to move forward with the action. Due to their failure to convince the remaining army to oust the Imperial House of Japan, they performed ritual suicide. As a result, the communiqué of the intent for a Japanese surrender continued as planned.
Plus a book of alternative history was written whereby the coup wad successful but the emperor had loyal officers put Crown Prince Akiro in hiding so in the end the coup would collapse. In the story the emperor knew if the military took over they could've staged his death and blamed the Americans. In the end the coup failed with the help of the U.S.
Fun fact about the Japanese imperial family: because only men descended from the current emperor’s great grandfather can inherit the throne according to current law and since the current emperor has no sons, the only people who can inherit the throne are the emperor’s brother who can’t father any more children, his only nephew who is still a child, and his uncle who is very old and fathered no children. Therefore, if all four of those people were to die and the emperor’s nephew had no children then no one could legally inherit the throne and there would be no emperor unless the law was changed to either allow women to become emperors or to bring back in outer branches of the family that have been cut off.
Something I never realized was is that the US indirectly saved Japan from becoming communist. They got Japan to surrender before the Soviets could touch the island. As we saw in Europe, anything the soviets conquered became communist. Also Anime probably wouldn't have existed under communism.
Me normally: "He died."
Me writing an Essay: "His tenure was cut short by a minor case of mortality."
Gonna be my epitaph 🤣🤣🤣
Also
"Fun fact..... No"
*thud*
I can relate when i try to hit that 300 minimum word count
Have to get to that 1000 word count somehow.
They did make him say he's in fact a man and not divine which was a big deal for the Japanese
Wow , really? What was the reaction of the japanese people? Did they believe it or refused to? were they confused or in denial?
@@afiffarhati4580 The peasants were shocked, everyone else was surprised because the emperor admitted to being human and not because they actually believed he was a god. He was effectively giving up a huge amount of his cultural significance to the Japanese people so it was a bit of a shock all around.
Definitely the reason why he caught the case of mortality, otherwise we would have lived forever.
@@giuseppemassari9970 A lot can be said about that considering the majority of Japanese people aren't even religious.
@@giuseppemassari9970
He did retract it after the US occupation in Japan ended.
Its like that guy who get punked out by a bully, wait for him to leave and then he whispers, "yeah, you better run." 😄
Japan is just living in denial if that's the case lol
US: You know we are probably going to bust you for war crimes.
Hirohito: I don't like communists.
US: Why didn't you say so? Welcome to the club!
British in 1945: ,,So, new government was formed, right?"
Polish Underground State: ,,I don't know, it seems like Soviets formed a puppet government in our country..."
British: *Government is government! Now get the hell outta here!*
And that's how Poland lost WW2.
US : We need to make sure Germany doesn’t stir up troblues again.
*East Germany exists*
US : Correction. We need to make sure West Germany get all kind of gold and money in the world just to beat their communist neighbour.
40 years later
France, UK, Italy, Spain, All of Eastern Europe : Can we get more rights in EU Parliament?
Germany : Shut up and go feed me more money and trades.
@@MP-vc4nu Honestly I think West Germany would of ended up in an economically better position anyway just due to the East being much more closed off, and the communist nation currency being nearly worthless outside of eastern bloc nations (Though the East German mark was probably the best of them). Pouring as much capital in to the west as western countries did though certainly helped build the juggernaut that is the German economy. Fun fact, the UK was opposed to German reunification just because of how strong a unified German economy would be, something they were proven correct about.
@@MP-vc4nu Just to mention it: In the name of capitalism, like everyone else is doing it too.
@@DrewPicklesTheDark The UK are a bunch of pussies. “Oh my god Germany is a economic powerhouse must wage war on them. Also give them some war reparations too!”
Crazy. Hirohito during his reign witnessed the rise of the Japanese Empire, Great Depression, Mukden Incident in 1931, invasion of China in 1937, World war II and the empire at greatest extent, 2 atomic bombs, post war recovery, Olympic opening in 1964, Rise of anime, economic growth and almost the entire cold war dying in 1989, just as the cold war was ending.
And he probably could've lived even longer had he not gotten intestinal cancer.
@@taiwandxt6493 *minor case of mortality
i am sure someone their made film on him or atleast anime on him
do you think he's watched some hentai?
@@kel000001 you never know
Also, there was a strong feeling that the removal of Kaiser Wilhelm in Germany in world war 1 contributed to a feeling of resentment amongst the German people, and a feeling that the Weimar Republic were a bunch of traitors whom had abandoned their rightful leader, which fostered an environment that could easily be exploited by the Nazi party in their rise to power. The feeling was that they had made a mistake there and were determined not to make the same one again. Hirohito would be able to keep the Japanese people on side in a way that a completely new regime would find impossible.
The Weimar Republic was run by a bunch of democratic socialist who royally managed to ruin the German economy, thereby leading to more extremist Socialist to take over. It has nothing to do with the kaiser
The difference is, that Wilhelm II was becoming more unpopular as the war dragged on and as soon as Max von Baden declared his abdication, he just feld the country, without fighting for his throne or openly saying that Max von Baden was wrong. He didn't put up any resistance. This seemed to the conservative Germans like cowardice and treachery, so there were no positive feelings about Kaiser Wilhelm II after 1918. Furthermore, his eldest son the crown prince was also rather unpopular
hirohito should've been tried and executed for the war crimes that his country committed and depose their monarchy like what happened to germany after world war 1, sparing hirohito from war crimes is like letting adolf hitler or benito mussolini go away from their war crimes unpunished
Except the Allies didn't remove Wilhelm. The German people did that themselves. There was a revolution in the streets, and the military refused to support him, so he abdicated and fled the country. This was on November 9, before the armistice was signed two days later.
@@kitchenaidwhiskeyjonesthe US has helped unpopular monarchs take/retake their thrones before. We tried it with the Soviets during their civil war and we did it with the Iranians by supporting the Shah. (Ironically, that's the core reason why those two countries dont like us today😅)
"His tenure was cut short by a minor case of mortality"
he just loves this phrase
He died in like the 1980's, he makes it look like it was shortly after WWII.
@Daood Zafar Thanks man!
I like Emperor who don't have any case of mortality.
Please don't copywrite that line, I want it on tombstone.
"And they still let the Emperor dress like an Emperor and have very nice things"
I see what you did there xD
Hah, Bill Wurtz reference
as long as people love him.. it is fine... still better than chinese that had no carea about anything...
@@campkira wtf are you talking about. Blunt ass comment about Chinese.
Ah, I see you are a fellow of culture as well.
We all love a bit of history matters, don’t we?
That’s... why we’re here
Tbf
Yep!
Yes
James Bisonette the most
The other thing to keep in mind is that the Japanese Emperors have seldom had any real political power for over a thousand years. Between the Fujiwara Regents, the Shoguns, and then the various ministers and generals post Meiji Restoration, there have always been others running the show and telling the Emperor what he should do.
As for the Showa Emperor himself (Hirohito), he actually expressed misgivings on several occasions with the way the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy were conducting themselves and the wars they were starting - including the attack on Pearl Harbor. The army ignored him and did whatever they wanted anyway, so the emperor eventually gave up trying - at least until the cabinet was deadlocked on whether or not to surrender at the end of the war. After the second bomb was dropped, he finally spoke up as the tie breaking vote and insisted on surrender. And for the first time in his reign, the generals and admirals actually listened to him and did what he said.
Edit: Since people are still, years later, dropping comments trying to correct me, let me put this here.
I live in Japan. At the time of this edit, I have lived here 15 years. That is 15 years of studying Japanese history. 15 years of visiting the places where these events happened and listening and/or reading first hand accounts from the people who were there. And while I may not claim to be a subject matter expert, I have very good friends who definitely are.
So before you reply to this comment, go read all of the other replies below. Or just don't reply, as I am tired of repeating myself every few months because some new internet random thinks they know more about Japanese history than the writer who is actually there.
The funny thing is - The public literally listened to him for the first time as well.
yes, his voice was never heard in public till then.
It's actually damned unfortunate too. Hirohito could've stopped Japan's involvement in the war if he was more outspoken than he is. As the public viewed him as a living god he could've ran Hideki Tojo out of office and gave his anti-war sentiments. All the millions of needless death could've been stopped if a single, individual man simply and firmly put his foot down against the imperialist ambitions of his empire.
@@OriginalGazGoose Except, not really. There were several times that he did try to put his foot down and even an incident where he straight chewed out senior military officials. The military then promptly ignored him and did whatever they wanted anyway. And Hideki Tojo didn't even become Prime Minister until well after the wars had started, and even then only after all of the other non-military Prime Ministers had either been assassinated or run out of office by the army. It is interesting how Tojo is often held up as some sort of evil mastermind who single handedly lead Japan into the war and all of the atrocities that were committed by the Japanese troops. In reality, by the time he became PM in 1941, the war in China had been going on for years and planning for the attack on Pearl Harbor was already well underway. Don't misunderstand, he was responsible for allowing a lot of the atrocities committed by the Imperial Japanese troops and was definitely part of the problem. But he was NOT the absolute dictator who pushed Japan to war that a lot of people seem to think he was.
And it wasn't just the Generals and Admirals in Tokyo either who blatantly ignored the will of the Emperor and the government. The staged attacks on railways in Manchuria (Manchukoku as the Japanese called their puppet state there) and the incident on Marco Polo Bridge were all done after the army brass in Tokyo specifically ordered the commanders there to NOT do anything to start a war in China. The local commanders were even more ultra-nationalist than the rest and did it anyway. Once the deed was done and the war was started though, the generals in Tokyo decided it was easier to save face by signing off on the whole thing after the fact than it would be to admit that they couldn't control their troops. And when the civilian government condemned the attack on China, young army officers started assassinating government ministers.
If you are interested and want to actually know what you are talking about, I suggest actually taking the time to study and learn about the rise of Japanese militarism and how the Japanese government functioned - or really failed to function- in the 1920s and 1930s. It is fascinating reading, and would be a hilarious comedy of errors and egos if it didn't ultimately lead to atrocities, war crimes, and so much death. Surprisingly, a good place to start is the recent series Extra History did on Japanese Militarism. Their channel can be pretty hit or miss on some of the stuff they cover, but this particular series is really well done and, while a bit oversimplified, it does a great job of showing how the entire system in Japan during the 1920s and 30s was hopelessly broken to the point that no one person could have fixed it. Not even the Emperor himself.
There was a very strong military class. They tried to prevent his radio speech surrendering from being broadcasted and attempted to assassinate the prime minister (I forget whether they succeeded). It was really Tojo who was in charge.
0:52 *Truman not to scale*
That caught me off guard!
Allies to Germany: You will pay for your deeds!
Allies to Japan: You cool man, see you next week
Allies to Germany: you'll pay for your dee-
America: yo, Is that a rocket,?
Von braun: Ja
America: You're hired!
Well they still dissolved Japan’s original empire including the occupation of Korea.
They did pay...they got 2 nukes dropped on them.
They even kept basically the same system of government. They just renamed the Imperial Diet the National Diet, replaced the House of Peers with the elected House of Councillors, and put in provisions in the constitution to stop the military and the emperor from taking over
@@brandonlyon730 And a significant number of their political and military leaders ended up hanged or serving life sentences.
To be honest I can see a giant Truman in a future Godzilla film.
Abu Omer StalGhidora
Harry likely thought the same about his omnipresent mother in law.
He WAS Godzilla!!! Symbolically.
Hindsight being 20/20. Truman was an idiot in my opinion. He removed MacArthur because he wanted to invade China. The years between the bombs being dropped on Japan and the Rosenbergs giving the secrets to a nuclear weapon to the USSR was the most wasted opportunity in world history. I know it sounds horrible but imagine a world where we listened to General Patton and wiped the USSR and communism off the face of the Earth
@@adambomb5381 I agree that the nukes were not necessary and Japan had been attempting to negotiate a surrender for over a year. However nuclear bombs are a good thing because if America and her allies had attacked the USSR it would have started a war more terrible than the last.
The most important thing this channel has ever taught me:
Dying is fatal
People die when they are killed
And results in a loud thud.
Dying usually is fatal, but it is possible to be clinically dead and come back to life.
And it happens only once -individually.
And to everyone -inevitably.
And living can be fatal
0:30
One of the best History Matters bit ever.
T Pose?
Hirohito:This is the 10th time today I have to do this
0:55 truman not to scale
i like the fact that stalin basically did not care at all
0:43 it should be noted (and emphasized) that keeping the emperor wasn't Japan's only condition for surrender, at least pre-nuking. Japan also wanted to try their own war criminals instead of handing them over to the allies (ie, letting said war criminals get off scot-free) and keeping their pre-war territory, such as Korea and Taiwan.
It's also expressly written into the Japanese post war constitution that the Emperor can have no say whatsoever over the government. The Diet led by the Prime Minister holds all power. While this is generally the norm in constitutional monarchies very few actually put it into law with one of the few other examples being Sweden. Technically Queen Elizabeth II could dissolve parliament and rule with her reserve powers (although she would then be deposed) in a way that the Japanese Emperor simply cannot
Queen Elizabeth the 2nd lost the power to dissove parliament with the fixed term parliament act 2011.
@@alexbennett7018 you're right, I didn't know that, just looked into that. She could still take over as a dictator like Charles I (obviously she wouldn't), but with parliament still in session she could be easily voted out and a Republic declared, just like what happened to Charles.
I mean, it all comes down to popularity. If she's way more popular than the parliament she could in theory force her powers and get away with it, although I doubt she'd ever do something like that.
@@RafitoOoO Yes I agree. For example, in WWII if Germany had installed a puppet government like they did in France, the people would have stayed loyal to King George VI. The King would likely have had to flee to Canada or the US, but if the allies later retook London they would have reinstalled him as King and the people would have sided with him over the puppet government. Thankfully, they never surrendered so we never had to go through that
The emperor in Japan didn’t had any power in the government before the Meiji era, the Shōguns ruled like prime ministers while the emperor was just a spiritual leader, It’s pretty much the same now, but with democracy.
America: "Yeah, we can use Japan in the fight against communism"
Japan: "K. Amerika-san, I finished dismantling my military"
America: *YOU DID WHAT*
America got played lol
Japanese soldiers in 1941: ,,We just attacked Pearl Harbour"
Hirohito: *You what?*
@BathTubMongrel Mussolini didn't change sides - at the beginning of Italian Civil War he was taken out of power and later arrested. Then Germans liberated him, put on leadership of Italian Social Republic (the German puppet state), and then shot after trying to flee Italy😉
Didn't the US forced the japanese to dismantle their military and later in the Korea War they realized that was a really bad idea?
@@yibithehispanic If I remember right, the US only said Japan couldn't declare war (they could still fight defensive wars and take part in military action). When Japan redrafted their constitution, it was included and the Japanese military was changed to a smaller purely defensive force under the name of the JSDF (Japanese Self Defense Force)
If the Americans had replaced Hirohito with his son. Then Akihito, the former emperor who is still alive and abidicated last year, would have ruled Japan for 74 years
Longer then queen Elizabeth hes still alive and chillin
The King of Romania would have had the beaten, if he hadn't been deposed first by the pro-Axis camp, and again deposed by the Soviets post war.
His son would’ve been in his early teens at that point right?
@@PHX787 Yeah basically, and it's not really uncommon for young folks in royalty to be the king/emperor, even if they're too young to rule, and if that's the case, they have a caretaker by their side until they reach a mature age in most cases, I guess.
Considering the fact that the Japanese emperor never really had any true power, both pre-war and after it, it wouldn't be too hard to replace the emperor, but it would be just more work, and also the people need to be convinced about it, I guess.
Wait Japan still has an emperor?
can we just take a minute to appreciate their consistency and quality of these uploads? looking forward to a video each week is one of my favourite things. if you see this, thank you for everything, Mr History Matters.
2:24 Cold War in 1980s
USA: Ronald Reagan
UK: Margaret Thatcher
USSR: Mikhail Gorbachev
Hirohito died in 1989
Damn if I saw Hirohito T posing as he descended from heaven I'd probably worship him too
Jesus is T-Posing in Brazil.
@Green Weed You're going to Brazil
But I believe one the conditions was to de-divinise him.
@Honeybunny /ハニーバニー it’s u again.. I see u everywhere
@Honeybunny /ハニーバニー it’s u again.. I see u everywhere
A free TH-cam movie called “emperor” is a master crafted movie about whether or not to keep the emperor post war
I've been seeing it in my recommended for some time now, now I gotta watch it
Link please.
I was also going to recommend that people watch that movie.
The Flying Dutchman yes
is it that 2013 moive?
Why the emperor was maintained in Japan?
Just look what happened to Germany after the Kaiser
franrobert80 fair point
True point however the Kaiser wasn't really seen as a god figure in Germany and he wasn't the kind of person willing to share powers
@@kalyka98 its a joke
@@kalyka98 Unlike Japan in WWII, one of president Wilson's condition after WWI was for german Kaiser to abdicate... german government leaders such as Ludendorff, Hindenburg and von Baden were monarchists and they did not want to accept that and thus Ebert was willing to lead the nation after Kaiser. Until late 1919 german people were still in favor of Kaiser except radical left lead by Liebknecht and Rosa Luxembourg.
Funny thing is, the German Republic was rather accidental. Kaiser Wilhelm abdicated and fled on 9 November, leaving a government headed by Max Von Baden and Friedrich Ebert, of the social democrats. Ebert wanted to preserve the monarchy in the form of some other member of the house of Hohenzollern, and waned Max Von Baden (the popular Chancellor) to act as temporary regent, but Max didn’t think he was up to it and declined. The German Republic was proclaimed by a minister from the reichstag balcony, during a lunch he was having with Ebert. Ebert briefly went to the bathroom, and the minister seized the opportunity, rushed out onto the balcony and declared a republic before a crowd which was assembled outside. When Ebert returned from the bathroom he was utterly furious, but the damage was done
It is very simple. After the post-WW1 chaos in Germany and Russia, MacArthur (or someone above him in the chain of command) realized that keeping Emperor Showa in power would give Japan a keystone around which the new government could be built. The decision worked out spectacularly.
0:54 "Truman not to scale" I love those subtle details, I can tell you have fun animating those videos.
Japanese citizen: "Look, the emporer has no power"
Hirohito: "Off with his head!"
Japanese guard: "Ummm...no"
At least he could focus on his personal scientific hobbies instead of all that boring government stuff.
@@sakataginko9092 yeah, like study fish.
Erick Chaves Soares heh, JoJo reference
Ummm. Actually the citizen would never say this and if one did the rest of the populace would think it an affront to the nation. The emperor wouldn’t need to order his decapitation, the citizen would be peer pressured into committing Seppuku for his disrespect. 🌸 🗡
@@Ake-TL Never watched that anime, but it works even if it is not a reference. His actual hobby was marine biology. Plus, seconding what alus nova said, pretty much spot on in regards to the deep reverence your average Japanese of the time had for the Emperor.
"Truman not to scale" made me laugh out loud. Thank you for that and for this whole video and series.
I always enjoy how he talks about death. "His tenure was cut short by a case mortality" sound more elegant than "he died"
“He caught a minor case of death”
He stopped with living and proceeded with death.
Or how about "he passed on"
This channel is probably one of the best informal channels I’ve ever seen and it never gets boring watching these lol
2:09 -United States and Japan along with allies against the Soviet Union "You suck"
That killed me so hard LMAOROF
Fun fact: Hirohito favored peace over war and didn’t want to start a war, but the military controlled the country and so they started the war in Asia, although Hirohito protested. The military worshipped Hirohito but had total control over Japan.
2 possible future video ideas:
Why wasn’t Italy trialled like the other axis powers after WW2?
Why are China, France, Russia, UK and the USA the 5 only Permanent members of the United Nations Security Council?
The allies in WWII were the Republic of China, the Soviet Union, the British Empire, the French and America. Thus they got to be the national that set up the UN and they (or their successor nations) got to be permanent members on the one UN panel that had anything resembling power and have a veto over it's decisions.
And the Italian resistance made a chance where they were able to conquer against Benito's regime, because of this, the West didn't want to punish Italy due to their actions during ww2, and they're aware that a Communist revolution would happen if they punish the Italians harsh.
@@LazyAndFabulous A communist revolution nearly happened as it was. I'm not sure there was a more active and politically powerful communist movement in Western Europe than the one in Italy. Had some of the complicit parties been weakened by trials, the communists might have taken a foothold in Italy, making the Greek communists even more likely to take power. NATO could have been strategically much weaker if the Eastern Med was effectively under Soviet control.
You make the UN, you get to make the rules.
There are several factors why Italians weren't put on trial for war crimes:
1) The overall amount of war crimes committed by Italy were not on the scale of those committed by Germany and Japan. Not even close.
2) Most of the war crimes attributed to Italy occurred in the context of African colonialism. Some African countries like Ethiopia and Libya wanted to try some Italians for crimes against humanity, but the British did not allow that to happen since they feared that it might set a precedent that could be used against them by their own colonies in the future.
3) The allies wanted to make sure that Italy was on their side in the upcoming Cold War. Harsh treatment of Italy might have lead to Italy becoming communist. This was especially important to the British, who, for the sake of their empire, wanted to ensure control of the Mediterranean. Passing through the Mediterranean is a much faster route from the UK to India than going around Africa. As a side note, this is also the reason Churchill was so keen on making sure Greece didn't go communist.
4) None of the major victors of WW2 (USA, USSR, UK, France, China) really held much of a grudge against Italy after the war. The Soviets wanted to see the Germans punished and the Chinese wanted to see the Japanese punished, but it doesn't seem like the people living in the big countries that won WW2 felt much of a desire to get revenge on Italy.
They didnt lose an emperor, they gained one. Emperor MacArthur.
no, he was the new Shogun
Ha! True
It was more like they went back to the pre-Meiji state of things. There was the Emperor, but all the power lay with the Shogun (MacArthur). They even called him Shogun while he was in command.
@@timfortune9
Gaijin Shogun
Geez this just reminds me of that one dumbly cheesy book called "The Foreign Shogun".
It's crazy to see photos and videos from the 1980s of Ronald Reagan meeting Emperor Hirohito, who died in 1989, the end of the Cold War. The guy literally lived through most of the 20th Century and was emperor during the most pivotal parts of it! I'd say our government liked him very much by the end of his reign, we love Japan!
Thanks!
Historically speaking, Hirohito was a believer of a constitutional monarchy and rarely intervened into politics while the constitution kind of allowed exclusive rights. There was a debate on how to interpret the part which said that “the execution of the emperor’s rights are done through advice of the ministers”, whether the advice was a requirement or not. Hirohito mostly followed the decision of the parliament with some exceptions. 1. When ultranationalist group assassinated ministers in an attempt to bring back power to the emperor, to which the emperor ordered total subjugation of the coup, and 2., when Japan declared surrender. Legally speaking, he had all the rights and powers to prevent the war from happening. But what he did was just approving anything decided by the parliament. That’s the debate of whether he is responsible for the war.
yeah, following the decision of parliament pretty much full of militant, power-hungry and war-mongering people, seems like a good idea to me.... that's like for US president to follow the advice of industrial military complex, oh wait...
Nice comment
Many Western people simply think that Hirohito was an equivalent to Hitler or Mussolini, but he was not
He has expressed his will to avoid war with US to his ministers (and basically everyone in the Imperial Conference agreed), and they failed
I would argue that if Hirohito had the courage to take charge, the war with China and the US would be avoidable, especially the latter
And the fact that Hirohito does not even try to revert some of the rules that are being imposed by the new constitution proves that Hirohito does not interested in ruling the country
@@mc95323 He might have had the legal power to do so, but he did not have enough people on board with the idea to move in that direction and keep power. At least that is the likely explanation.
And there is some speck of a moral high ground, for taking on the Western colonial powers in Asia.
"Making the Americans fairly grumpy since now they had to do all defending" big brain Japan lol
And that's more or less how the Japanese Self Defence Force (Postwar Japanese military) was formed, with the Korean War going on, the US released they couldn't protect Japan while fighting in Korea, so the Japanese were authorised to have some military capability (initially called "national police reserves" and "coastal safety force") before becoming the JSDF.
@@casuallatecomer7597 which... became one of the most powerful naval forces in the world lol, powerful enough to challenge the chinese navy head on if it came down to it.
Gotta love how the most powerful and technologically advanced Asian navy... is technically an extension of the coast guard.
@@blackpowderuser373 Not really, the JMSDF was an _offshoot_ of the Japanese Coast Guard early on, however, the modern JMSDF and Japanese coast guard are under different government ministries.
@@casuallatecomer7597 I see. And now they are slowly dropping the pretenses. Especially with the Izumo carriers.
Because James Bisonette threatened to withhold funding if they got rid of the Emperor
Japan's patreon was really in the dumpster at the end of WWII
@@josephpapilson7224 And was released soon after since the Judge was also funded by James Bisonette
Who is he
@@cu11csti74 he the guy they give thanks to for support on Patreon
James Bisonette in 1945: "No, the Emperor stays. It'll make for an interesting video on History Matters."
Im glad you made this video. Because of the history they teach in schools now does not lead to an as obvious conclusion as it was when i was in school. Good Job and keep Rocking!
Something that should be noted is that they did force Hirohito to be in a picture standing next to General MacArthur (who was much taller), which was then published in the newspapers to show the Japanese people that he was not the divinely chosen leader of Japan. From this point on the Emperor of Japan was merely a constitutional monarch with little actual power, so in a way he was removed from power.
0:54 *Truman not to scale
Thanks for the clarification there, I definitely needed it.
0:07. Running through a field saying "I'm Alive." Considering what happened to Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, Yamamoto, and Roosevelt, truer words have never been spoken...
I’m really sad there was no end credit sequence, those are my favorites
The other thing to note is that Hirohito was essentially a figurehead during WW 2.
The true power was Tojo and the military
It's the same reason why Italy's king wasn't removed after WW 2.
Victor emmanuel III wanted peace but he was a constitutional monarch so had limited powers mussolini gived Victor emmanuel titles as king of Albania and emperor of Ethiopia the prince becomes leader of itallian east Africa
The sight gag of (insert historical figure here) skipping through a meadow because they (insert specific success here) might just be my favorite running gag on TH-cam...
0:11 Hirohito did not think it was “a swell idea” and was very reluctant to involve japan in war against the west. It was chiefly the Japanese military and his own brother that pushed him towards aggressive foreign policy. In fact he specifically put Tojo in as PM so the military could take the blame for Japan’s warmongering.
Thanks, was looking for comment fixing that blunder said in the video. I know it's always "simplified" but Hirohito wasn't in favour of the war, or at least not with the USA. But - sadly, he didn't really have that much power in the government and was merely a stamp, signing military decisions and acts.
wasn't it primarily the Japanese navy, because even the Japanese Army was against hostilities towards America
That was the idea that US government sell to the whole world that Hirohito is relunctant to go to war to against the west but personally I do not believe that
Limp “military” encompasses the IJN and IJA
Even one of the military body, the famous Isoroku Yamamoto, was heavily against it
I’m always so impressed by your graphics, the range of topics you cover and the amount of information you manage to fit into 3 minutes History Matters, keep up the great content 👌
Indeed the cutting edge graphics is the first thing I notice too. Can't imagine what the render time is like. It's as if I'm there.
Schumachers Batman Maybe I should have said ‘animations’ rather than graphics 😂
Everyone always asks "who is James Bisonette"
But nobody asks "how is James Bisonette"
No why is James Bissonette?
No Where is James Bisonette?
How about WHAT is James Bisonette?
*Bissonnette
James Bisonette is owner of large restaurant chain across East coast (origin is New York of course) and I'm sure he is fine
The dictators of Thailand and Spain managed to stay alive and in power too, but they were also minor axis nations with a limited role in WW2.
Frabco was neutral during WW2, despite having been supported by Hitler and Mussolini (mainly because Spain couldn't afford it)
@@videonofan you gotta give credit to Franco for listening to his generals when they told him Spain wouldn't even be a speed bump for the allies
@@ihateyankees3655 Franco was a rational dictator, like Pinochet and Soeharto. They did a lot of bad things, but are smart enough not to invade other country to deny their enemies any justification to topple the regime.
The opposites are Hitler, Mussolini, Saddam Hussein, and Soekarno, their regimes are short-lived.
Thanks for explaining this puzzle so clearly and concisely. You really pack a lot of great information into your videos, they are terrific.
Really that should Emperor Showa as that was his chosen Imperial name Saying Emperor Hirohito would be like a Japanese academic talking about the reign of King Albert when discussing King George VI.
Be*
It was done on purpose, as part of McArthur's efforts to demote the emperor's image as a living god, to ensure that *everytime* western media talked about the man, they'd use his birth name rather than his regal name. Likewise the relaxed pose you see McArthur adopted in the photo he took with the defeated emperor: again, to show Hirohito's humanity and destroy any pretension of godliness
@@AndresJames54 not quite since you know Albert and George are different people. A closer comparison would be calling pope Francis by is secular name Jorge
@@luisss3929 George VIs christian name was Albert, named after his father, Victoria's huisband, but he adopted the regnal name George VI
@@luisss3929 Yes, George VI was christened Albert. He chose the name George, after his father, upon being crowned. In the same way that Edward VII's birth name was David.
MacArthur deserves a lot of credit for recommending the Emperor stay as well. He knew the culture.
@zain mudassir I was going to say that.
@zain mudassir he nearly caused a nuclear attack (not war, because you know, anybody except US had nuclear weapons at that time) because he didn't underestimate chinese communists, and today we see the results...
@@Niko-1303 Nuking communist China would assure the USSR's retaliation against the US, and I surely hope you're not advocating for a nuclear holocaust just because modern China is a dictatorship.
Your telling me any other general wouldnt know about the culture?
@@velcranoxofficials9970 Many Generals would not have bothered, especially in that time trying to learn about a culture so diametrically different from them.
0:10 is kind of an asterisk. From what I’ve read, the Emperor thought it was a bad idea to go to war, but since the military basically had control over the government, (reminiscent of the Shogunate) he couldn’t do anything to stop the momentum and just hoped for the best.
Dude. Just apologize for the shit Japan did.
@@westharrison9936 You do know the emperor has no real power right?
Hirohito getting to return home and just chill out for the rest of his life has to be the biggest bailout in human history.
I read somewhere that Hirohito used his mahjong power to win a mahjong game against Dougas McArthur, and thus was allowed to remain emperor.
The funny thing is before I got the notification for this video I was watching the video talking about why Japan wasn’t split
Lol
They were still somehow split north-south as the Russians got back the Sakhalin’s which they lost earlier in the Russo-Japanese war.
1:11 I didn’t know I needed to see McArthur in a powdered wig today.
That emperor was heavily pressured into not opposing Japan's military leaders, or so I was taught in IB history. He encouraged bombing pearl harbor??
No - he was no less surprised than Americans themselves, when he heard Japanese Army did something like this.
No, he didn't. Emperor Hirohito was concerned by the lack of success of the occupation in Manchuria, and he scolded the military leaders about it. General Sugiyama later wrote that Hirohito asked him if China is a vast country which is difficult to control, then how would Japan control the Pacific Ocean which is much bigger.
In Admiral Nagano's own words: "I have never seen the Emperor reprimand us in such a manner, his face turning red, and raising his voice."
"Remained on the imperial throne, until his 10 years was cut short by a minor case of mortality" that is the greatest catchphrase so far in your channel
2:35 why do i like this so much
1:14 😂
It’s facts it’s history
One of the few you tubers that improved in every way.
I would like some more medieval videos though
Good news then because Saturday's video is about Medieval banks.
@@HistoryMatters spoilers! :O
@Wrwo James That's modern.
@Wrwo James Nope, James Bissonette
@@HistoryMatters How do you come up with questions I *SHOULD* be asking everytime god damn
The Tokyo trials were such a mess
Prediction: The willingness of Japanese soldiers to never surrender gave them leverage.
Incidentally, he's now known as Emperor Showa. That's because Japanese emperors get a new name when their soul enters the Yasukuni Shrine.
Even the whole era of his reign is named Showa.
靖国神社は国に殉じた兵士とかを祀るためであって天皇はそこにいないよ、昭和天皇は武蔵野陵に葬られてる
Fun fact: The emperor did not know about the invasion of manchuria, or pearl harbour, nor the Japanese declaration of war on China and the US respectively, until after they happened. The Japanese ministers had a policy of 'ask forgiveness rather than permission' for things the empreror would not like (even if they did ask and he said no, they would often to it anyway). So they just did what they wanted and 'asked' him afterwards if it was okay: if he said yes - great, if he said no - it was already done.
He also very rarely said no, he wasn't particularly interested in ruling the country and did not see it as his place to overrule the ministers - as far as he was concerned they were in charge not him.
Finally, he was very regretful and even distraught over the fact he did not do more and stand up to the government during the war. He said in his dairy multiple times that he was horrified of what he had learned his people had done during the war as tactics and treatment of POWs.
Americans: Lets liberalise japan and remove the emperor
Sees Eastern Germany...
Americans : |
Hirohito:You could not live with your own failure...
Where did that bring you?Back to me.
???
The kaiser had already gone before WW2, I'm not really sure what comparison you're trying to make here.
I’ll guess I’ll have to do some re-reading of emperor Hirohito. When I read about him I got the impression that he was hesitant about declaring war on the USA, it was mostly the military generals that wanted to go through with it. I remember reading a book years ago that he read a poem in front of his military generals that went along the lines of “why can’t we all just get along”. Then again this was a Book I read more than 10 years ago, and probably more research has been found.
よもの海みなはらからと思ふ世になど波風のたちさわぐらむ
That poem literally means "All people within the world are brothers, however the wind and waves don't stop.“ It could be also understood as "We love peace, but now there are so many threats that we have to fight." And the poem was written by his grandfather Mutsuhito, for the Japan-Russia war in which Japan won a great victory.
Apparently Hirohito wasn’t just pressured to abdicate by foriegn demands, but also members of the Imperial Family such as Yasuhito, Prince Chichibu (his eldest younger brother), Nobuhito, Prince Takamstsu, (his 2nd younger brother), and Prince Naruhiko Higashikuni (the Emperor’s “uncle”, although that is not actually how he is related to Hirohito) to allow another Imperial Prince, not necessarily Akihito to become Emperor.
In reality, MacArthur knew that having a cultural head who hates the USSR was gonna help them become allies, so when he wrote the constitution and made the democratic government, Hirohito was still given cultural leader.
I think it is also important to note that it was a bit harder to prove the emperors involvement in much of the war. As every general etc took the fault for themselves and also because the power relation was a bit weird
I remember early 1989 when he died. Our ( Australian) government ordered flags at half mast but received a massive backlash ( Australia had many troops suffer in Japanese POW camps) and within a few hours had to rescind the order. There was even 44 years later incredulous disbelief that he wasn't executed as a war criminal.
@Niek Vels we didnt at the time.
Strange. If you look at Pew research polls about opinions on Japan by country, generally the whole world has an overwhelmingly positive view of Japan but Australia is one of the highest cherishers of Japan. 81% favorable.
The Emperor does not abuse prisoners of war. It is wrong for him to be executed.
@@user-pn3im5sm7k
I’m guessing the poll would be about modern day Japan, not WW2 imperial japab
@@highadmiraljt5853 Considering the Pew Research center was founded in 2004, yes...
Also I don't think anyone needs to do a survey during a world war, everyone is going to hate each other lol
1:34 is that stalin driving the middle boat? mustache?
Nice catch
Iron Stash did you stare at the screen for EVERYTHING or was this a coincidence...
@@hiimryan2388 wasn't really that hard to spot tbh
he needs to make sure his soldiers still return to the USSR after the fight is over and don't just decide to stay in Japan
@@hiimryan2388 he is in fact named Iron Stash for a reason
"The emperor wasn't some official"
Wilhelm II. After WW1💀
can you imagine if Songoku was made to be super comrade instead of a super saiyan ...
Your depiction of Douglas MacArthur works sublimely with this art style. His pipe is great.
Stalin probably wouldn't have minded to keep fighting because it would've meant that the USSR could get a foothold in Japan
hardly without US naval support so any foothold they made would be something the us "allowed" at best for him a communist Hokkaido would have been a thing during operation downfall and agreed by the US to have an Ainu puppet state as reward.
@@HipFire1 False, the red navy could easily make it across. And the Soviets had already taken the higher up Islands and were literally a few days away from invading the mainland before calling it off. The soviets could have easily invaded inner japan no matter what the US thought. Look up the invasion of the Kuril Islands.
@@americancommunist6076 the soviets took ridiculous casualties taking the kurils for such a small task and the biggest plan the soviets had was taking northern Hokkaido at best. there was never going to be a soviet invasion of the Japanese islands unless the US gave them direct support in case operation downfall went south (which was basically the plan B).
Well, considering most of the things mostly done by Tojos order and Emperor effevtively in castle captivity just like shogun era.
*Truman not to scale.
Thank you, for I thought Truman was a godly being and dropped the nukes himself
Timestamp?
@@winchesterchua3311 0:54
When you lose WWII and yet you get to rule until 1989 and your last soldier surrenders in 1974.
1:47 NEW ROYAL EDICT: We are now a democracy. Signed, The Emperor.
This part had me laughing so hard. What an oxymoron!
The King of Italy was left in place as well. He abdicated after the war in favour of his son, and they were ousted when the monarchy was abolished altogether by popular referendum in 1946.
I heard hirohito tried to surrender a bit earlier in the war but the military refused to listen to him but still fought in his name.
0:53 oh really, I thought he was just standing in front of a map.
still, hilarious joke.
Xavier Saavedra oh he isn't a gigantic alien... :(
Hahahahahahaha I missed it on the first watch. Thanks !!!
Xavier! Nice profile picture. Mine is based on the original.
It definitely would have made winning the war a little easier
Imagine if it was to scale...
*DUN DUN DUNNN*
you just earned a new subscriber, great 3 min summary
The animation is too good, the signs, the expression changes, cant stop watching these
What an incredibly nuanced peace of history I never knew about. If we invade the soviets invade? That is just incredible and I can’t wait to look this up more
From what I understand, Hirohito and MacArthur got along pretty well considering the circumstances.
I think the Pastry Section would be a great emperor. Free pastries for everyone
I love how he waddles up w/ the sign & just falls over dead. *historical accuracy*
I love that many answers to historical questions can be boiled down to "The USA didn't like communism"
Just recently discovered your channel and gotta say, I love it. Hilarious and informative at the same time.
Fun fact:
Removing emperor would end up in another war just like if someone try to remove the british monarch.
Furthermore in Shinto the emperor is a living deity
Well now after the war he was just descended from diety.
@@Darkfawfulx the Goddess Amaterasu
@@blenterbl what do you mean
@@blenterbl The Japanese “atheist” is not the same as a materialist atheist in the west
Some Japanese officers decided to continue fighting even after its military manpower was depleted and the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
When the emperor decided to surrender, the Kyūjō incident happened. It happened on the night of 14-15 August 1945, just before the announcement of Japan's surrender to the Allies. The coup was attempted by the Staff Office of the Ministry of War of Japan and many from the Imperial Guard to stop the move to surrender.
They attempted to place Emperor Hirohito under house arrest, using the 2nd Brigade Imperial Guard Infantry. They failed to persuade the Eastern District Army and the high command of the Imperial Japanese Army to move forward with the action. Due to their failure to convince the remaining army to oust the Imperial House of Japan, they performed ritual suicide. As a result, the communiqué of the intent for a Japanese surrender continued as planned.
Plus a book of alternative history was written whereby the coup wad successful but the emperor had loyal officers put Crown Prince Akiro in hiding so in the end the coup would collapse. In the story the emperor knew if the military took over they could've staged his death and blamed the Americans. In the end the coup failed with the help of the U.S.
@@carterbentonjr399 could you send me the title of that book?
I really like how digestible your lessons are, LOL Ive binged since the HRE to here
The movie "Emperor", addresses this question beautifully. Tommy Lee Jones is in it as MacArthur.
Imagine HTLR ruling West Germany until the '60s and building a Führerbunker II.
Hirohito wasn't as much of a scumbag tho so there's no real comparison
@@chillaxo9863 Lol he wasn't?
@@chillaxo9863 Nanjing: Am I a joke to you?
Bataan Death March: Am I a Joke to you?
@@dschulieen He didnt have any actual controll in Japan and he was against invasion of China.
Fun fact about the Japanese imperial family: because only men descended from the current emperor’s great grandfather can inherit the throne according to current law and since the current emperor has no sons, the only people who can inherit the throne are the emperor’s brother who can’t father any more children, his only nephew who is still a child, and his uncle who is very old and fathered no children. Therefore, if all four of those people were to die and the emperor’s nephew had no children then no one could legally inherit the throne and there would be no emperor unless the law was changed to either allow women to become emperors or to bring back in outer branches of the family that have been cut off.
Something I never realized was is that the US indirectly saved Japan from becoming communist. They got Japan to surrender before the Soviets could touch the island. As we saw in Europe, anything the soviets conquered became communist.
Also Anime probably wouldn't have existed under communism.
Soviets got the Kuril Islands and Southern Sakhalin back tho, the former still being an issue today
Probably the greatest achievement of Japan bar none. Manga/Anime is pretty much a cultural revolution.
Communists or not, Japan still makes anime, anime has nothing to do with politics
@@帅气的可可communism wouldn’t allow anime they would be a separated society.
I learn so much from History Matters than all my years in school learning history from Kindergarten through University! No joke!
I came here for knowledge but i stayed because your art and animation is so interesting to watch