Star Citizen: Comparing all of the ships in the 100 series

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 113

  • @TheDill0n
    @TheDill0n 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    I think something people often miss when comparing this ship to other starters is its just more fun to fly , and in a flight sim that's pretty important. Great video

    • @mikeonlinux5491
      @mikeonlinux5491 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes, and it also looks way better. When you are going to spend A LOT of time in a ship (especially true in a starter ship, in which you won't do tons of money fast), might as well have a pleasing style and fun handling :)

    • @spitfyrevii933
      @spitfyrevii933 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Got a 135C with ingame currency and absolutely love it. Whenever I take off from a pad i just max the throttle, hold down space and flip it around before slamming afterburner away from the station. Quick and nimble makes it easy to do bunker missions since its easy to just fly in behind the bunker tower and not get shot at. Probably gonna get the 125A after the 3.17.2 wipe. Perfect little ship for solo or duo grinding ground missions.

    • @scotscottscottt
      @scotscottscottt ปีที่แล้ว +2

      100i%

  • @ReallyDazed
    @ReallyDazed 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Don't even care if I like the ships or not. I see a LawoftheWest video, I watch it and like it.

  • @detpackman
    @detpackman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    starter ship aside , the 100 series is perfect optional Runabout for 890j owners , rather than taking a 890 down to land somewhere take the 100i , collect some cargo and go back to the 890 ,its a much better option than the 85x imo

    • @Dolhedew
      @Dolhedew 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And since you can fit three of them, I'd personally fill the 890's hangar with two 135c's and a 125a. Send them out and you have 12 scu and a decent amount of firepower just in case you need it

    • @detpackman
      @detpackman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Dolhedew so many options here this makes the 100 series a much better option for a 890 than a 85x for sure mix and match your 100 series to meet your 890s needs

    • @Dolhedew
      @Dolhedew 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@detpackman Yup. Now first I just have to get an 890... :|

    • @detpackman
      @detpackman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Dolhedew or have a orgmate or friend with one that you can throw your ship into and be a crewmate

    • @Dolhedew
      @Dolhedew 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@detpackman that's true, but when the game is eventually officially released at some point, one of my goals in to get an 890 that my friends and I can use as a mobile homebase while also doing some touring to make money on the side while we do our real jobs.

  • @asog88
    @asog88 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My wife owns the 125a and I love flying her ship. Even though it’s not as agile as say the arrow, it makes up for it by being an actual pleasure to fly. They really nailed the German engineering feel

  • @brrt1680
    @brrt1680 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Always a good day when LAWoftheWEST uploads

  • @retrowrath9374
    @retrowrath9374 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    You can use them at Platium Bay outposts, spawn them, refuel, restock and store, 100i has great quantum fuel and hyrogen fuel efficiency plus the bed for logging out at your favorite place.

  • @TsvetanVR
    @TsvetanVR 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I love the 135c but I just can't ignore the fact it costs the same as a 315p, while offering less (less cargo, less shields, less amenities, less everything), especially further down the road when the 315p will hopefully become fully functional. Being able to spawn the 100-series from outpost pads usually reserved for ground vehicles is a nice feature. Can't help but think that further down the road, such small ships would be great rentals to use when your main ship is docked at another station/system or even set up as a mobile base somewhere in space.

    • @viperswhip
      @viperswhip 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But it fits in a Carrack, that's why you would own one of them.

  • @phoenyxrisen3976
    @phoenyxrisen3976 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Just got my SC game, and chose the 100i, and upgraded to the 125A, thank you for this video, it helped me a lot to decide my first ship in game.

  • @blacksheepwall79
    @blacksheepwall79 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I just had an idea for a ground vehicle. It's literally a 1 SCU box. But you press a button and it deploys into an ultralight rover.

  • @edj7111
    @edj7111 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You make deciding which ships to get easy peasy lemon squeezy. Thanks for the vid!

  • @1DaytoDay-089
    @1DaytoDay-089 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Your analysis of the different ships and comparison between them are really the best. The image quality, sound & music, all great. But the narrative, that was excellent, to say the least.

  • @deltaecho2621
    @deltaecho2621 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video Law! 100s are nice, well rounded starters that compete nicely against the Aurora and the Mustang.

  • @bleachorange
    @bleachorange 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    If you want to ship good at combat and at carrying cargo, get the Avenger Titan. Best starting ship in the game in my opinion.

    • @suntzu5562
      @suntzu5562 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cutlass black

    • @kalrex6615
      @kalrex6615 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Slavic stripe Suit at that point you’re at $100+, not very “starter” friendly

    • @420247paul
      @420247paul 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kalrex6615 if you are going to pay 65 for a Titan you might as well spend 115 for a cutty

    • @kalrex6615
      @kalrex6615 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@420247paul that's... like double the price though.... that's like saying well if you pay $15 for a hamburger you might as well pay $40 for a steak

    • @NeutronicalGaming
      @NeutronicalGaming 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kalrex6615 I mean the steak IS just that much better as a meal, though so you're kinda proving his point.

  • @MultiMonitor
    @MultiMonitor 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great comparison. And thanks for the help in-game yesterday.

  • @cervantes01
    @cervantes01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like the 100 series, but I wish that there was a few more luxury touches on the inside as they are a bit sparten.

  • @Bland-79
    @Bland-79 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The 100 series will fin in the Carrack's hangar with all three wheels touching the deck. It just requires it to be landed in just the right place and with the nose at an angle.

  • @JagHiroshi
    @JagHiroshi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    100i with all stealth components is the perfect little courier.

  • @geronimo5537
    @geronimo5537 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    the 125 is my overall favorite, best maneuvering, best parts, and best looks in my opinion.

  • @Robisme
    @Robisme 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks like a ship fit for a Mandalorian. Get the cargo variant and store the bounties in the back. Carbonite freezer using the interior cargo area. The slabs are then automatically pushed into the rear cargo area.

  • @VulpesChama
    @VulpesChama 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice to hear your voice again. :)
    I don't know why, but I kind of like the 100-series, especially the 125. I cannot say it makes me want to buy any other Origin ship. Their design is usually a bit too.... smooth.

  • @KodiakGaming
    @KodiakGaming 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I almost want these little guys, just as another option for the carrack's runner.

  • @Wolf_Rayet
    @Wolf_Rayet 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    best ship rewiev videos are in this chanel ,not an Origin fun but still a good starter ship,great work

  • @anothergoogleuser
    @anothergoogleuser 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for sharing. I do not like that they cost more than the 300 series.

    • @MaculaPravus
      @MaculaPravus 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They cost less, CIG increased the price of all the 300 series.

    • @brrt1680
      @brrt1680 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MaculaPravus They also raised the price of the Avenger Titan which would make sense considering the Titan and the 300 series are very closely matched.

    • @canis9749
      @canis9749 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      they only increased the avenger titan and 300i with 5$ (making them still cheaper than any except the 100i), the stalker, 315 and 325 didn't change.
      a 315 and 135 are the exact same price even

  • @Cpt_Birch
    @Cpt_Birch ปีที่แล้ว

    As an owner of the 325a. I relly enjoy the look of the 125a. The missile rack looks fun. And not having to deal with a ladder seems nice

  • @ElijahNMitchell
    @ElijahNMitchell 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just picked up a 125a (using aUEC) and I have to say, it's amazing! For running bunker missions around MT it is perfect. Can park right up to the bunker, it's pretty quick, plenty of fuel. NO LONG BOARDING ANIMATION! For dedicating combat I have my Sabre, for cargo I have my RAFT or 400i. But for just zooming around, I'm really liking the 125a. Decent internal storage too (no gun rack though). Would I pay actual money for it? Probably not, but it's cheap enough in-game to be worth picking up.
    Oh, and two last features that are very helpful: can spawn at an outpost, and the expedite is INSTANT, saving time.

  • @Eneov
    @Eneov 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tight vid as usual my man. Love your reviews and that buttery smooth voice.🤟👉

  • @verpine3534
    @verpine3534 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    All three of the 100 series ships have the same dimensions, which makes me wonder what the 100i has in the space that's occupied by the second missile rack in the 125a or the additional cargo space in the 135c. Does CIG have an answer to this? I didn't find it if they do.

    • @johnwolf2349
      @johnwolf2349 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was hoping they'd give the 100 more interior, as it's supposed to be the 'touring' version. Though, looking at the size of that module probably not...

    • @YTe1000
      @YTe1000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I read somewhere before it has additional fuel tanks in that space but neither erkul nor official website says it has any more fuel capacity or fuel tanks, can very well be just empty space

  • @Savingtoasty
    @Savingtoasty 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very tempting to use a a cargo box mission runner. However I’ll stick with the 325a for a little bit bigger living quarters and heavier fire power. Good review!

  • @Kapnoullas
    @Kapnoullas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic comparison as always. Thanks for another great video.

  • @MacMeaties
    @MacMeaties 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm personally a really big fan of smaller, soloable ships over the giant hypewagons, partially because we won't be able to solo the big ships later in the games development cycle like we can now; CIG have reiterated this many times.
    Also as an IRL campervan person I just love little ships with living compartments; if CIG would bring out a slightly larger, quantum capable MPUV with the storage space used for a bed and shitter I'd buy 3 of them.

  • @viktorgavorn4635
    @viktorgavorn4635 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Im almost certain you'll be able to use a pair of these in a C2 as a sort of baby idris...

    • @NeutronicalGaming
      @NeutronicalGaming 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whilst i'm sure they'd fit the c2 wont be suitable for launching ships, i can guarantee you'll have a bad time parking them inside that thing in any sort of a hurry it's a cargo box not a landing bay, and we've seen what happens when a rogue ship clips into a cargo grid of a bigger ship, everything goes boom.

    • @viktorgavorn4635
      @viktorgavorn4635 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NeutronicalGaming ? People store ships in cargo bays all the time, and the C2 would be perfect for launching ships because the cargo bay goes the whole way through, very similar to the Idris or bengal

  • @therealtjpek
    @therealtjpek 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Feels weird the bed doesn't retract

  • @churchson1048
    @churchson1048 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the "i got money for dayyyys" line of ships

  • @CelesteAyanami
    @CelesteAyanami 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice and well put-together video!

  • @mr.t3p370
    @mr.t3p370 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the West I hope you and your loved ones are doing good it's been 3 weeks since your last video Earth brother. 👍🤠

  • @Anonlie
    @Anonlie 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks' for making more vids, missed your videos on my feeds.

  • @Ryecrash617
    @Ryecrash617 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic video. It really makes me wish I had a need for one of these ships.

  • @Folkeregor
    @Folkeregor ปีที่แล้ว

    This is one of the few series where i think the base model is the best value. The 125a isn't a big enough performance boost for the added cost and the 135c is simply a smuggling ship at a price point where you can get a more serious cargo vessels.
    I also contend that they are the best delivery ships in the game due to their speed, small size (closer parking) ,fuel efficiency, and convenient ground-level door

  • @fauli75
    @fauli75 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Origin 100 Series is absolutely gorgeous!

  • @DOSHIELD
    @DOSHIELD 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. I always enjoy watching your content.

  • @Shaiyo5
    @Shaiyo5 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wait, if the 125A and the 135C both have use for the rear space, what does the 100i have back there that it can't be used?

    • @Leptospirosi
      @Leptospirosi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just empty space to save on costslile when you buy a basic car without all the bells and whistles

  • @gittyupalice96
    @gittyupalice96 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have to say, its fun and easy to fly, has a great view out of the canopy and is very zippy. The fuel system is amazing, But.. The Misc Freelancer Duration also has a specialty fuel refinery built in on board that is probably about as big as the entirety of a 100i ship. So no, it is not the only one in the game that can do this. That being said! I find myself wanting to hop in the 100i even though I have some of the most expensive ships in the game, and have no reason to ever touch a 100 series, other than I want to.. And that says something for the design. My one and only complaint, is that the 135C should have increased quantum fuel capacity, just like the bigger 315P wich I also own. Its increased to around 800, I believe the 135 should also be around 800.

  • @polzanoreeve8533
    @polzanoreeve8533 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video thanks.

  • @meat-hook
    @meat-hook 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had a 300 a long time before these came out, so I'm not sure why I'd need one of these, but they are cool.

    • @Leptospirosi
      @Leptospirosi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Let's put it this way: I have had a 315p since the begin of the year and had mixed feelings: the cargo bay are technically cosmetic as you can't physically out anything inside without if falling out randomly or freaking out. The up in the air entry sometimes works, sometimes clips you through the ship, depending on the patch I was playing. The ship is pretty big and loses pieces with ease and just sports 2s3 weapons and 2 missiles.
      Carrying any box inside can be tricky at times.
      Now that we will get a full wipe I'm throwing away aUEC just tot est stuff and I bought a 135c in game.
      It's surprisingly fun to use and probably more effective in combat then my 315p, more agile, accelerate faster laterally and vertically and apparently cannot deplete it's hydrogen fuel whatever you do, even boosting all day. It is much smaller and lower then the 300 serie, lacks a WC and a kitchen but keeps the bed. The WC in the 300 serie does not have a shower so I guess the time in the wild is limited anyway. The ship small size make it a viable snub ship and the quantum fuel is larger then in any other small ship and on par with the 300 serie, except the 315p which has marginally more fuel. It lacks a shield compared with the 300 but since 3.14 it doesn't changes much, and the 100 serie is better at avoiding being hit. It also spawns on any mining base.
      What makes my day is that cargo bays are actually usable and entering the ship never tried to murder me.
      You technically could transport 6 people in the cargo bay without killing them and whoever fits in the cabin as well.
      If you are going for a starter fighter with some utility, go for the 325a; if you need an daily runner and a small hauler get the 135c instead of the 315p until they will implement the tractor beam and other stuff.
      I'm contemplating melting my fully pimped up 315p for one of these.
      Entering almost at ground level really make a world of difference in practicality.
      One caveat: if you despawn a 100 serie with the engine on, it will respawn mid air on the landing pad and you won't be able to retrieve it.
      I hope it will be fixed soon.
      My dream ship on the serie is a fast ambulance with the cargo bay switched for a medical bed (you can load the victim from the rear ramp)and a couple of small seats instead of the logging out bed.

  • @MrG-zn6gh
    @MrG-zn6gh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like to imagine that one or two people here would've tried climbing into the back of a 135 at some point in the game and going wherever it went

  • @parisienneoz4741
    @parisienneoz4741 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good videos keep it up please really enjoy them!

  • @RahzZalinto
    @RahzZalinto 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    my brother got the 135c starter package, cuz it had 30 months insurance xD

  • @iamscoutstfu
    @iamscoutstfu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 125a needs a weapons upgrade. Should drop the AIR system for two additional s2 weapon hardpoints
    Or drop 1 and add a s3 hardpoint in asymmetric config.
    Or origin needs to make a 200 series

  • @Meuduso1
    @Meuduso1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not gonna lie, I didn't care for the 100 series at all but now that I know that it could be put into the Carrack Scout Bay that opinion has changed. I won't buy it but I may try to buy one with aUEC or later UEC. Thing is that it doesn't fit 100% and it still has a lot of other competitors that can also fit up there like the Buccaneer which is probably the best ship for that slot if it comes to taking a combat ship along, the 85x, M50, Razor, Aurora, MPUV, the Arrow in the future when you can lower the landing gear without folding the wings and of course the Pisces, so if CIG changes anything with how ships behave when inside another one and if a ship doesn't fit 100% into another one takes damage or it is just dangerous overall, then the 100 series drops fast.
    I'd really like to know if whoever worked on the 100 series thought about the Scout Bay or tried fitting it in there.

  • @Stafernisy
    @Stafernisy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the touring for qt range

  • @drksideofthewal
    @drksideofthewal 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You know, three 125a's might be a pretty good defensive option for an 890 Jump.

  • @scotscottscottt
    @scotscottscottt ปีที่แล้ว

    I really like the 100i. I think it's the best starter ship, even though the Pisces is technically more useful. The 100i looks better, flies better, fights better, offers much better views, and has a bed, which is incredibly convenient. The one issue is with its top speed. Its pathetic at 1000 m/s when even the cute little C8X shuttle is faster. Still, I have one of each and I find myself flying the 100i 99% percent of the time. I hope CIG give the 100-series a pass when they change the flight model and balance them better. I'd hate to have to spend another $10 on the 125a. Haha

  • @hege2427
    @hege2427 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    could you do a compariosn between 100i and aurora. perhaps in mind of them as a snub fighter ship, cause they are rather small and can fit some bigger ships (carrack, 890)? For combat the 125 vs the Aurora LN (the 2 shields from the Aurora seems really competitive) or the 135 (closed cargo bay for ranger) vs the Aurora CL in terms of cargo

  • @thejopp
    @thejopp 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have no real need of the 125 but its so sleek and nice.

  • @kingslaphappy1533
    @kingslaphappy1533 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great content creator!

  • @TippedCoyote757
    @TippedCoyote757 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sadly I don't have a pc powerfull enough for sc but the 125 A is most definitely my choice when I do

  • @lucasneves4191
    @lucasneves4191 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you guys know when the 100i series will be able to buy again?

  • @ZebraActual
    @ZebraActual 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice review!

  • @DanakarEndeel
    @DanakarEndeel 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    While I personally view the 100-series as a bunch of overpriced lemons I do appreciate your videos LAWoftheWEST. :)
    I'm still going to stick with my Avenger Titan though. :P

  • @zat132
    @zat132 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!

  • @Maldayne
    @Maldayne 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a good look.

  • @davidblalock9945
    @davidblalock9945 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unless they hugely handicaps this ship by the time I get my new PC built, the 100I will be my starter ship.

  • @FRETW1ZARD
    @FRETW1ZARD 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You said "the top speed of the 100i is slightly FASTER than the 125a, and slightly SLOWER than the 135c" is that definitely correct? Because it seems out of line with the other stats.

  • @PrimalMoz
    @PrimalMoz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well 100i has the bed made by drake

  • @machoalright
    @machoalright 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    135C competitor with the reliant kore anyone? :)

  • @themeddite
    @themeddite 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    135C is best IMO

  • @waberoid
    @waberoid 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The X1 series can possibly fit in the back

  • @dagoriva4216
    @dagoriva4216 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @ne3333t
    @ne3333t 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Did we really need this ship? It seems kind of redundant.

    • @shoutade9508
      @shoutade9508 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yep, because its another starter ^^

    • @Nemoticon
      @Nemoticon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      A LOT of people will not see it as being redundant... which validates it entirely.

    • @bleachorange
      @bleachorange 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I still want to see an anvil startership, or a crusader starter.

    • @Nemoticon
      @Nemoticon 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bleachorange Personally, I don't think any of those two manufacturers should be going near starter ship models, it wouldn't fit their lore. If anything, it's Drake and MISC who should have starter models in their lin up.
      In saying that, that are a lot of starter ships already available that many will move on from very quickly. What we need is more mdeium size ships that are specific to the wide variety of professions that will be in the game.

    • @bleachorange
      @bleachorange 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Nemoticon for me personally, seeing starter ships from those two manufacturers won't really matter, as I've backed enough to not need that level of ship. I really just want to see anvil expand a little bit more but I am super digging crusaders design aesthetic and I just want to look at every single crusader ship that they release.