@@AncientArchitects Yes! Keep your mind wide open. Too few people do this nowadays. Oh also. have you had a chance to examine any of the sand from the cavities drilled into? Would you like to examine a sample? Mail me for info or questions.
FYI, At 6.03 in this video - th-cam.com/video/q4NnCAZcxHg/w-d-xo.html - Hancock says he has no argument with Hawass over the dating of the pyramids - so i’m assuming he believes it dates to Khufu/4th dynasty. Apologies if I’m wrong but I thought Hancock and West very much date the Great Pyramid to 4th dynasty Egypt. Thanks for watching! Please Like the video if you enjoyed it and please subscribe! If you want to support the Ancient Architects channel, I’m on Patreon at www.patreon.com/ancientarchitects - thank you!
the channel "The basement office" had a great episode on this UFO encounter where the guy was given bienary code and the co-ordinates was for a land mass off the coast of UK. They said its a celtics old tale that land used to be there. it would be great to get out of egypt for a change and learn who the celtics were and why they believed in this land that nolonger exists. also its the best documented encounter of a third kind
Hi Matt. I am from a village near Mount Nemrud. It matches with content. There are so many mysteries on this site. I suggest you look into this. Best wishes.
Dear A2, It is amazing how much thought and time and energy you are spending on re-thinking the pyramids. It’s got to be one of the most fascinating subjects in the whole world. Your insights allow my mind to venture into new realms of possibilities. In my inventor’s mind, I keep coming back to the fact that the biggest structures mankind has built have been for power i.e. dams. The Great Pyramid of Giza was apparently the first one to be built and it’s absolutely perfect. All of Egypt seems to be the same, the ancient structures were perfectly conceived and things went down from there. What I believe is that the Great Pyramid of Giza was built to provide a power source for the people of its time stamp. There is evidence of heavy usage where door hinges were installed, etc. Something was going on there and experts in energy production have said it was for making energy. What has probably been absconded by the Egyptian officials is the library with books explaining everything. Will we ever know? The most fascinating thing to me is that no one wants to go there - to the power plant theory. Keep up the good work! You're doing a great service to man.
@@AncientArchitects I look forward to the nostalgic feeling brought on by the music every time I start (and end) any of your videos. Every time. Even if it's one I've watched 20 times. Doesn't matter. Truly appreciate you and your work sir. Please, never give up the fight to uncover the truth.
2:00 I agree with this idea that just because Khufu has his name on the site doesn't mean he made the pyramids. The marks may just show that he did work on the site.
It's odd that menkaure's chamber ceiling is rounded instead of flat. The Arabs named the King's and Queen's chamber because men would be buried under flat roofs, women would not
Pyramid seeds perhaps? One digs an underground chamber, then plants the pyramid seed. After some time time, a small pyramid will sprout. When cared for with long forgotten rituals, and lots of water, it will eventually grow. The great pyramid was built on a natural spring, so it kinda "cheated", and so it grew very large in a short time.
@@AncientArchitects Good luck mate. While they need a lot of water, i think they might create off-springs (literally) if given too much, like the small pyramids on the Giza place.
Again the thing that brings me back to your uploads is that rare ability to modify, change or develop your theories. Constantly offering up new ideas to the table. I can't pay you a higher compliment than that. If only that approach was widespread we would have way more answers than we do. Those thinking characteristics are the basis of progression...Respect, peace
I’m constantly reading, researching and thinking and the more I learn, the more it shows that ideas need to adapt. Every single researcher should be like this. We need to focus on the anomalies too. Understand and explain the anomalies first, if possible
The assumption that these boxes were sarcophagus needs challenging. These boxes were made with engineering precision and non sarcophagus size like in the serepeum. In the Pitt of Zawyet the "tub" is buried under a floor of masonry with no body inside when uncovered. You may have hit on something by observing that the box is central to the pyramid, this may be important to the operation of whatever the buildings did and the role of the boxes in their function
I met a man who said he meet Dr. Zari Hawass, and the Dr. told him basically what you are saying, that the Giza plateau is actually new larger pyramids built over smaller ones.
Mind blowing stuff mate! Really does get the brain juices fired up, what i like about you is the fact you are not just going over the same old theories, but actively adding your own conclusions to the Mystery, it's a funny thing, no one knows, so no one is wrong and nobody is correct, i believe you are on the correct path however and you are a great Credit to the field! If we ever find out what the Pyramids are, it'll probably be something you have already covered! LOL.. Cheers! :)
I used to work setting up manufacturing cells in factories. Many times we had to put things in areas that didn't make sense. The original work cells made perfect sense but when the job changed or went away, the space had to be repurposed for a job that didn't fit perfectly there anymore. That's great insight.
We've all seen the drawing of the overhead view of the Giza Plateau with all of the angles and sacred geometry it's supposedly supposed to be teaching us. So you should try to redraw it with only two pyramids or smaller pyramids and see if the dimensions make more sense
@@AncientArchitects very long time follower but this is the first time you've commented on one of my comments. if you come up with anything give me a minor shout out. Good luck and keep pumping out this awesome content
This was my thought exactly. I've just listened to a very compelling 6 hour lecture by Edward Nightingale about the Giza Template geometry layout that builds a damn good case. It would be great to see how any of this would change with your proposed modifications applied to the structures. I imagine the centres would have to be the same, maybe? Also interesting how the Great pyramid features the very precise 8 sided geometry, but the others do not, so you could be onto something here. Why would the cheapen out on the rest? Intriguing...
I have a question about the pyramids, if they were built in ancient Egypt then where are the ancient records and text about the actual building of such massive structures, it's not like the Egyptians are shy about their accomplishments
It is sad that no matter what is given we can only guess how these structures were built... but when we challenge ourselves and pose new theories, we get closer to the truth. And if we dont, at least we used our imagination and tried to solve mysteries!! I believe that the original builders of the great pyramid were trying to deliver a message. I believe that the egyptian authorities are trying to keep quiet about new discoveries and i hope we get to know the truth about giza in our lifetime because it is something that had puzzled me for two decades now... Thanks for this amazing new theory. I appreciate your effort
Right, the "changed their mind" conspiracy theory. How can they possibly justify such a ludicrous notion without being laughed out of the archaeologist school? Why do they even tolerate these conspiracy theories? So they plan with meticulous mathematics and perfection and then 'change their mind' twice. Ha ha ha, and they think we're mad! Priceless!
I just don't believe that any pyramid, world wide, was ever used as a tomb. Granting the fact that being so large they basically painted a target on the structure saying "hey break in here to find cool stuff", no evidence of burial has been found in any pyramid outside of empty "sarcophagi". I personally believe most pyramids had a primarily religious function and were built or attributed to a certain leader.
@@averymiller6900 So many theories! Seriously can't wait for more discoveries. It is truly a crime against humanity that we're not FULLY excavating all of Giza and SO many other ancient places around the world. I would much rather dump Hundreds of Billions of dollars doing this that funding the MIC and their bullshit wars against humanity. We could learn SO much from even one locations uncovering. Imagine if we were allowed full access to ALL of these ancient and often off limits sites? The implications of this could be life and history (obviously) changing. Truly is maddening how little we've been "allowed" to do at these sites. Let alone the fact that people (governments) have been covering up pyramids and ancient sites all over the world especially in China for decades. Makes me feel like I'm gonna be sick.
This makes a lot more sense. There were certain periods and kings that initiated large construction projects, mostly in later periods. The Sphinx's head was re-carved into a pharaoh head very late, at the end of ancient Egypt's existence. Maybe even a few times before.
This new theory has merit. It explains the different passages and chambers in the two pyramids. But I don't think, for all the renovating Khufu may have done, that he made the Great Pyramid his tomb. I don't think he could have resisted the urge to cover all of the walls inside with paintings and hieroglyphs. So I do agree with your thoughts here, in part. Good video! :)
dianna2911 I think he did a video explaining that the salt build up on the interior walls over thousands of years (i guess just from humidity?) would destroy the top layer of stone and remove any carvings and paintings
It's so fascinating, how these constructs on the Giza plateau have changed and been added to over the vast amount of time the ancient Egyptian civilization existed! Why should the Giza plateau be any different as far as enhancements and re-building than the great Karnak temple?
Love your channel material and the clever thought put into your hypothesis, I must add that the "renovation" depicted (turning small pyramid into the GIANT pyramid) would be more than a mere "renovation"; It would be every bit the undertaking of the Great Pyramid.
Great thank you! I think the great Pyramide was enlarged too. The Queen chamber was the original chamber. Thats the reason why the shafts from the Queen chamber dont reach the surface!
Matt, put down the egyptologists books and go and interview structural engineers, Senior project managers and scientists in order to appreciate the scale of the design, and the execution of it.
Those folks know nothing about what the pioneering Egyptology researcher saw, learned, recorded, and analyzed. THEY are the horse's mouth. THEY were there and recorded it all. And you say to put down their writings? Not a good approach. You are thinking that mechanical knowledge can substitute for abstract thinking about issues unrelated to mechanical function, which is only a limited part of the puzzle.
Exactly. Modern engineers know they wouldn't be able to built that now, so it's was without a doubt impossible for ancient egyptians. Some much earlier more advanced civilization built all that, then was destroyed by cataclysm at around 12500 years ago. I can't believe anyone can take seriously that nonsense about pharaohs building that
However, I still want to see a recreation of some of the work performed on stone from these times. I find some of the statues too perfect to have been done with dynastic tools.
If the pyramids were enlarged, which I find likely as I've stated before, I think 'stuff' might have had to give way for it. There might be subterranean chambers or even small pyramids that served as fundaments (why clear a pile of stones and erect a pile of stones in its place?). Moreover I guess that some other structures might have served as raw material, leaving their subterranean parts that were filled or sealed as they were no longer important. Both such structures would be evidence for a later massive renovation.
Ancient Architects How do you know that there are no more shafts to be discovered in the pyramid of Chephren? Because of what archeologists have told us? For all we know there could be a Grand Gallery in there, similar to the Great Pyramids, Red Pyramids, Bent Pyramids. Need I go on!!!
It is really really difficult to guess how the pyramids were built but I do have the impression that the most massive pyramids were built in 2 distinct stages probably separated by a huge amount of times. Meidum pyramid and its tower-shape core gives us the best clue as to their construction, it is very likely that others were built the same way. When I look at Meidum pyramid I can see a very high quality and relatively smooth core surrounded by cruder and later limestone bricks. Of course all of this needs challenging.
Could the small triangle seen rising from the paws of the sphinx on the stella at 13:55 be the third pyramid but in a much earlier stage and smaller size?
You guys do realize that the relieving chambers where the Khufu cartouches are found were completely sealed until Vyse opened them with dynamite right?
Great Video - As Usual. - Thank You, Again! I agree with you - that surface level stuff like graffiti should NEVER be given serious consideration. Also, similarities with other pyramid-like structures around the world just furthers the theory that transportation around the world more than 5k years ago was a great deal more common than what we're lead to believe. I also believe that when carbon-dating is the only thing standing in the way of advanced technology's existence tens of thousands of years ago - the carbon dating results should be thrown out - NOT the evidence! - paul
Duuuuude duuude duuude duuude😱😱😱, i cant contain the amount of hypothesis , your hitting me with💫💫 , but i waaaaant more , don't stop , this is so dam mind blowing.....💣💥💥💀
Great view on Menkaure, I believe you’ve nailed it. Still think Khafre originaly was a trunkated one at half its height and that the core of khufu is older than any pyramid. A lot of things where left there to be discovered when they came waging war from the south. Arid climate and sediments flooding the Nile came gradually as did the huge constructions over aquifers which seems to have become a global technology a verry long time ago.
I like to read the old books to see what was recorded. To get the facts. Interpretation is then up to anyone, who can fit the pieces into a narrative. We don’t have all the pieces so we have to do our best when we attempt it.
It's so cool to look at these artifacts & plainly see that the Egyptians had an advanced knowledge of geometry & the proportions of beauty. You see this translated in Greek art, less so in Roman art, etc. It is more evidence suggesting the degeneration of knowledge of a once Great Civilization, like Atlantis. I love this stuff, thank you for all your research & efforts in this channel, Man.
A fact mentioned by many is, the trouble the dynastic egyptians had scratching granite with their chissels, which is a way to distinguish what they built, from what they found already there.
Excellent review, perfectly structured reflection and excellently thought-out hypothesis Matt, as usual ! Late yeasterday I came across the short comment of "MrCripian" and your reply, concerning the presumed Cheops cartouche in the GP. Since the subject is quite burning and of great interest to me, I dug it deeper a few weeks ago and I found interesting elements about this matter in an interview of the German archeologist Dominique Görlitz on the German TV channel Nuo Visio. This scientist had been accused of having illegaly damaged this cartouche during an April 2013 visit he made inside the discharge chambers above the so-called King's room and sentenced to a 5 years prison term by an Egyptian court. in the wake of it. However, this accusation was fully fabricated by Z.Hawass and his henchmen, and the gentleman was declared fully innocent by the same court in 2015, thanks among other things images of the cartouches and their marks taken by Pr.Schoch in 2006 which were provided to him by R.Bauval. These pictures are the proof that the damages (4 chisel marks which can be seen on your video between 2.36 and 2.43) were made between 2004 (at this date another photo shows no marks) and 2006 !!! Here are the most important points put forward by D.Görlitz in his interview: - he indeed took some microscopic (
Someone needs to help spread your summary, and I would be interested in reading it with that aim in mind. sciencetheory.wordpress.com/category/ancient-mysteries-ufos-e-t-technology/ Facebook; adrien.nash.9
the two pyramids in the steele clearly indicate Menkaure and Khafre, not Khufu, which is more logically a later-comer in the order they were build. If you ran Egypt, you would build from small to large, and the Khufu pyramid is the most developed in terms of architectural design. Makes more sense that Egyptians worked from less complicated to more complicated...
The Great Pyramid is on another level than any of the other pyramids. Also, it’s interior chambers are made up of 5 different types of granite. It’s absolutely plausible that it’s the only structure older than everything on the Giza plateau. It’s been renovated and reworked with newer additions which makes it harder to understand what era it was originally constructed.
I don't know if this supposition is correct, but it does seem at least plausible and logical to me that the structures had different phases and functions through history and, for example, it's reasonable to conclude the multiple entrances, etc. indicate multiple phases with multiple architects, as opposed to concluding one architect changed plans halfway through as if they couldn't plan things out beforehand.
If I remember correctly, the Great pyramids outer parts could be dated to Narmers period at 3100 bc by dating the mortar used. Is there any similar datings for the stonework on the two other pyramides?
Yes, apparently so, from the original round of carbon dating from matter between the stones on the outside. I’m not sure this method is all that reliable for these monuments, sadly.
What do the sphinx boxes have to say about the new smaller sizes of the pyramids? Do they still line up roughly the same way or do the lines change where they land?
Well they don’t line up with Menkaure‘ as expected. But they do line up with the larger size Khafre, as expected, if it was enlarged at the same time the Sphinx was renovated
Very fascinating! Right or wrong about this or that, it is certainly interesting to hear of alternate possibilities to the Main Stream narratives which are baseless to say the least. BUT!... there's a serious problem that needs to be addressed, and it is the fact that inexplicably, not only is the great pyramid 8-sided, but so is the small one (Menkaure), leading to the supposition that it was built that way by the same builders for the same reason. So that fact needs to be factored into a new narrative, which seems quite difficult to do since no one has any good explanation for the 8-sided design, nor why it would be repeated many epochs later but not with the middle pyramid. Good luck with that task.
As I was watching, I wondered to myself if anyone has ever looked under the sarcophagus in the great Pyramid. I'm not sure if is can be moved or not. Is it fastened to the floor or somehow built in? Just curious.
@luminous life I think it was a chip of granite, probably inadvertently situated where workers turned the box back onto its bottom. Who knows, maybe gun powdered was used to blast off the lid and the explosion flipped the box over onto its side (since the blast would have been from one side to the other, namely from the badly broken corner side) Afterward they would have re-uprighted it as they found it.
More excellent stuff Matt, if only there was a way to prove your theories, maybe in time and when the antiquities department come out of the dark ages things can be pieced together. Thanks.
At 18:36 the photo shows that the Menkaure pyramid was also concaved and very likely started out as a water source. Not the only one. Perhaps all 3 were water machines of some type. Peace,
I think your hypothesis makes a great deal of sense. The Great Pyramid has not been changed as evidenced by the 'creases' on each side which stretch from bottom to pinnacle and as you mention its construction and design is far in advance of the others. You comments on the Sphinx are also accurate in my view as the rock outcrop and obvious additions in order to make it into a lion or some other form confirm. Very good video and solid analysis.
Interesting. The main question I have is, - If the pyramids were created on this timeline and at these initial, smaller, sizes then how'd they end up being perfectly in alignment as a representation of the constellation Orion? From above, the size, spacing and alignment match Orion with a fair degree of accuracy. If they were created and rebuilt, out of sequence and over time, it would seem that they accidentally ended up matching Orion; which would be an amazing accident.
Love all the research you put into your videos and that you're not afraid to change your mind on theories!
Thanks
@@AncientArchitects Yes! Keep your mind wide open. Too few people do this nowadays.
Oh also. have you had a chance to examine any of the sand from the cavities drilled into?
Would you like to examine a sample? Mail me for info or questions.
FYI, At 6.03 in this video - th-cam.com/video/q4NnCAZcxHg/w-d-xo.html - Hancock says he has no argument with Hawass over the dating of the pyramids - so i’m assuming he believes it dates to Khufu/4th dynasty. Apologies if I’m wrong but I thought Hancock and West very much date the Great Pyramid to 4th dynasty Egypt. Thanks for watching! Please Like the video if you enjoyed it and please subscribe! If you want to support the Ancient Architects channel, I’m on Patreon at www.patreon.com/ancientarchitects - thank you!
the channel "The basement office" had a great episode on this UFO encounter where the guy was given bienary code and the co-ordinates was for a land mass off the coast of UK. They said its a celtics old tale that land used to be there. it would be great to get out of egypt for a change and learn who the celtics were and why they believed in this land that nolonger exists. also its the best documented encounter of a third kind
Hi Matt. I am from a village near Mount Nemrud. It matches with content. There are so many mysteries on this site. I suggest you look into this. Best wishes.
Dear A2, It is amazing how much thought and time and energy you are spending on re-thinking the pyramids. It’s got to be one of the most fascinating subjects in the whole world. Your insights allow my mind to venture into new realms of possibilities. In my inventor’s mind, I keep coming back to the fact that the biggest structures mankind has built have been for power i.e. dams. The Great Pyramid of Giza was apparently the first one to be built and it’s absolutely perfect. All of Egypt seems to be the same, the ancient structures were perfectly conceived and things went down from there. What I believe is that the Great Pyramid of Giza was built to provide a power source for the people of its time stamp. There is evidence of heavy usage where door hinges were installed, etc. Something was going on there and experts in energy production have said it was for making energy. What has probably been absconded by the Egyptian officials is the library with books explaining everything. Will we ever know? The most fascinating thing to me is that no one wants to go there - to the power plant theory.
Keep up the good work! You're doing a great service to man.
Thank you
Your time and quality spent on each one of your videos is much appreciated. I’d think you are one of the BEST and TRUSTED in the business. Thank you
Please don't change the epic intro music.
Never
Agreed.
@@AncientArchitects I look forward to the nostalgic feeling brought on by the music every time I start (and end) any of your videos. Every time. Even if it's one I've watched 20 times. Doesn't matter. Truly appreciate you and your work sir. Please, never give up the fight to uncover the truth.
"Herro everybody", just as iconic! Every time I hear both I think, "this is where the fun begins".
2:00 I agree with this idea that just because Khufu has his name on the site doesn't mean he made the pyramids. The marks may just show that he did work on the site.
0:45 THIS is why i like your theories, you dont try to sell it as "the only truth"
Damn, this one was especially impressive.
Outstanding work.
Thank you
i'm watching this later tonight but this comment has me hyped.
There really is no other channel on this subject comparable to AA..!
It's odd that menkaure's chamber ceiling is rounded instead of flat. The Arabs named the King's and Queen's chamber because men would be buried under flat roofs, women would not
That is certainly a new creation. I’m sure that pyramid was rebuilt.
I believe it was reworked and for 20 years they probably where working on the casing stone and not the pyramids entirely.
Pyramid seeds perhaps? One digs an underground chamber, then plants the pyramid seed. After some time time, a small pyramid will sprout. When cared for with long forgotten rituals, and lots of water, it will eventually grow. The great pyramid was built on a natural spring, so it kinda "cheated", and so it grew very large in a short time.
I’m going to plant one in my garden. Wish me luck!
@@AncientArchitects Good luck mate. While they need a lot of water, i think they might create off-springs (literally) if given too much, like the small pyramids on the Giza place.
I feed miy pyramid granite and limestone
Again the thing that brings me back to your uploads is that rare ability to modify, change or develop your theories. Constantly offering up new ideas to the table. I can't pay you a higher compliment than that. If only that approach was widespread we would have way more answers than we do. Those thinking characteristics are the basis of progression...Respect, peace
I’m constantly reading, researching and thinking and the more I learn, the more it shows that ideas need to adapt. Every single researcher should be like this. We need to focus on the anomalies too. Understand and explain the anomalies first, if possible
Well done! This has to be one of my favorite videos on your channel and I’m excited to see more like this in the future
Love your channel, especially all your Great Pyramid theories 😊
The assumption that these boxes were sarcophagus needs challenging. These boxes were made with engineering precision and non sarcophagus size like in the serepeum. In the Pitt of Zawyet the "tub" is buried under a floor of masonry with no body inside when uncovered. You may have hit on something by observing that the box is central to the pyramid, this may be important to the operation of whatever the buildings did and the role of the boxes in their function
I met a man who said he meet Dr. Zari Hawass, and the Dr. told him basically what you are saying, that the Giza plateau is actually new larger pyramids built over smaller ones.
Mind blowing stuff mate! Really does get the brain juices fired up, what i like about you is the fact you are not just going over the same old theories, but actively adding your own conclusions to the Mystery, it's a funny thing, no one knows, so no one is wrong and nobody is correct, i believe you are on the correct path however and you are a great Credit to the field! If we ever find out what the Pyramids are, it'll probably be something you have already covered! LOL.. Cheers! :)
Cheers mate!!
@@AncientArchitects And Breath....
you're on fire lately man. Thanks! Keep it up!
I used to work setting up manufacturing cells in factories. Many times we had to put things in areas that didn't make sense. The original work cells made perfect sense but when the job changed or went away, the space had to be repurposed for a job that didn't fit perfectly there anymore. That's great insight.
We've all seen the drawing of the overhead view of the Giza Plateau with all of the angles and sacred geometry it's supposedly supposed to be teaching us. So you should try to redraw it with only two pyramids or smaller pyramids and see if the dimensions make more sense
Great idea
@@AncientArchitects very long time follower but this is the first time you've commented on one of my comments. if you come up with anything give me a minor shout out. Good luck and keep pumping out this awesome content
jwhitely7 Totally will. I’ll screenshot this to remind me too. Sorry I’ve not seen your comments in the past and thanks for watching!
Can the enlarging of the originals be purposed to change the relative orientation ie to come into line with the Orion hypotheses?
This was my thought exactly. I've just listened to a very compelling 6 hour lecture by Edward Nightingale about the Giza Template geometry layout that builds a damn good case. It would be great to see how any of this would change with your proposed modifications applied to the structures. I imagine the centres would have to be the same, maybe? Also interesting how the Great pyramid features the very precise 8 sided geometry, but the others do not, so you could be onto something here. Why would the cheapen out on the rest? Intriguing...
Another great instalment Matt. Thank you xx
Thank you
I have a question about the pyramids, if they were built in ancient Egypt then where are the ancient records and text about the actual building of such massive structures, it's not like the Egyptians are shy about their accomplishments
Superb video Matt. Very special video indeed.
It is sad that no matter what is given we can only guess how these structures were built... but when we challenge ourselves and pose new theories, we get closer to the truth. And if we dont, at least we used our imagination and tried to solve mysteries!! I believe that the original builders of the great pyramid were trying to deliver a message. I believe that the egyptian authorities are trying to keep quiet about new discoveries and i hope we get to know the truth about giza in our lifetime because it is something that had puzzled me for two decades now...
Thanks for this amazing new theory. I appreciate your effort
Thanks
Right, the "changed their mind" conspiracy theory. How can they possibly justify such a ludicrous notion without being laughed out of the archaeologist school?
Why do they even tolerate these conspiracy theories? So they plan with meticulous mathematics and perfection and then 'change their mind' twice.
Ha ha ha, and they think we're mad! Priceless!
True that Homeslice
I just don't believe that any pyramid, world wide, was ever used as a tomb. Granting the fact that being so large they basically painted a target on the structure saying "hey break in here to find cool stuff", no evidence of burial has been found in any pyramid outside of empty "sarcophagi". I personally believe most pyramids had a primarily religious function and were built or attributed to a certain leader.
@@averymiller6900 So many theories! Seriously can't wait for more discoveries. It is truly a crime against humanity that we're not FULLY excavating all of Giza and SO many other ancient places around the world. I would much rather dump Hundreds of Billions of dollars doing this that funding the MIC and their bullshit wars against humanity. We could learn SO much from even one locations uncovering. Imagine if we were allowed full access to ALL of these ancient and often off limits sites? The implications of this could be life and history (obviously) changing. Truly is maddening how little we've been "allowed" to do at these sites. Let alone the fact that people (governments) have been covering up pyramids and ancient sites all over the world especially in China for decades. Makes me feel like I'm gonna be sick.
@Dr. M. H. You've misunderstood me my friend. By 'they' I mean the mainstream archaeologists.
@Dr. M. H. Yes my friend, on the button 😀
Great one. I agree that explaining anomalies as huge mistakes is sorrowful. Keep up the innovative thinking.
Some great ideas, Mathew! I think you are zeroing in on it. Keep it up!
Thanks Greg
I love how you give the clue b4 the video comes out. Totally original. That and you work is actually very good thanks for all your hard work!
Thank you
This makes a lot more sense. There were certain periods and kings that initiated large construction projects, mostly in later periods. The Sphinx's head was re-carved into a pharaoh head very late, at the end of ancient Egypt's existence. Maybe even a few times before.
It seems you revealed something very serious here. Great work !
One of the best videos you have done , thanks for all the detail and hard work, always look forward to the next one.
This new theory has merit. It explains the different passages and chambers in the two pyramids. But I don't think, for all the renovating Khufu may have done, that he made the Great Pyramid his tomb. I don't think he could have resisted the urge to cover all of the walls inside with paintings and hieroglyphs. So I do agree with your thoughts here, in part. Good video! :)
dianna2911 I think he did a video explaining that the salt build up on the interior walls over thousands of years (i guess just from humidity?) would destroy the top layer of stone and remove any carvings and paintings
Yes, I can see that. Thanks!@@jayp7845
@@jayp7845 That was in regard to the 'Queen's chamber' which was lined not with granite but with absorbent limestone.
Great video! Congrats on the news article about your sphinx theory.
Thank you
It's so fascinating, how these constructs on the Giza plateau have changed and been added to over the vast amount of time the ancient Egyptian civilization existed! Why should the Giza plateau be any different as far as enhancements and re-building than the great Karnak temple?
Love your channel material and the clever thought put into your hypothesis, I must add that the "renovation" depicted (turning small pyramid into the GIANT pyramid) would be more than a mere "renovation"; It would be every bit the undertaking of the Great Pyramid.
Great thank you! I think the great Pyramide was enlarged too. The Queen chamber was the original chamber. Thats the reason why the shafts from the Queen chamber dont reach the surface!
Very nice work.
Thank you
Another great video.
Thank you
Always fascinating and informative as usual.
Matt, put down the egyptologists books and go and interview structural engineers, Senior project managers and scientists in order to appreciate the scale of the design, and the execution of it.
Those folks know nothing about what the pioneering Egyptology researcher saw, learned, recorded, and analyzed. THEY are the horse's mouth. THEY were there and recorded it all. And you say to put down their writings? Not a good approach. You are thinking that mechanical knowledge can substitute for abstract thinking about issues unrelated to mechanical function, which is only a limited part of the puzzle.
Exactly. Modern engineers know they wouldn't be able to built that now, so it's was without a doubt impossible for ancient egyptians. Some much earlier more advanced civilization built all that, then was destroyed by cataclysm at around 12500 years ago. I can't believe anyone can take seriously that nonsense about pharaohs building that
Well done again man 🤘🏽👍🏽😎
Thank you
Thanks for all your hard work!
Thanks for watching
Excellent hypothesis! I am well on board with your description of the differences in the pyramids. Great work on this one
However, I still want to see a recreation of some of the work performed on stone from these times. I find some of the statues too perfect to have been done with dynastic tools.
If the pyramids were enlarged, which I find likely as I've stated before, I think 'stuff' might have had to give way for it. There might be subterranean chambers or even small pyramids that served as fundaments (why clear a pile of stones and erect a pile of stones in its place?). Moreover I guess that some other structures might have served as raw material, leaving their subterranean parts that were filled or sealed as they were no longer important.
Both such structures would be evidence for a later massive renovation.
Ancient Architects How do you know that there are no more shafts to be discovered in the pyramid of Chephren? Because of what archeologists have told us? For all we know there could be a Grand Gallery in there, similar to the Great Pyramids, Red Pyramids, Bent Pyramids. Need I go on!!!
Do they let people in that one?
It is really really difficult to guess how the pyramids were built but I do have the impression that the most massive pyramids were built in 2 distinct stages probably separated by a huge amount of times. Meidum pyramid and its tower-shape core gives us the best clue as to their construction, it is very likely that others were built the same way. When I look at Meidum pyramid I can see a very high quality and relatively smooth core surrounded by cruder and later limestone bricks. Of course all of this needs challenging.
Awesome work, thank you 👍👍
Thank you
really great video and content
18:43 is appears the great and menkare pyramids have the "8 sided" shape but not khafre. is this correct?
Could the small triangle seen rising from the paws of the sphinx on the stella at 13:55 be the third pyramid but in a much earlier stage and smaller size?
U seen all the graffiti in there anybody could of signed their name don't mean they built the great pyramid...
Yep, as I say, it’s not conclusive evidence, circumstantial at best.
Even Greg Hancocks grandpa left his signature there.
@@adamscheffler So did Graham Hancock's.
You guys do realize that the relieving chambers where the Khufu cartouches are found were completely sealed until Vyse opened them with dynamite right?
The only thing that is conclusive is the water erosion on the enclosure.
Great Video - As Usual. - Thank You, Again!
I agree with you - that surface level stuff like graffiti should NEVER be given serious consideration.
Also, similarities with other pyramid-like structures around the world just furthers the theory that transportation around the world more than 5k years ago was a great deal more common than what we're lead to believe.
I also believe that when carbon-dating is the only thing standing in the way of advanced technology's existence tens of thousands of years ago - the carbon dating results should be thrown out - NOT the evidence!
- paul
Thank Paul
You can't carbon date a rock.
Paul Martin
Carbon dating cannot be used for dating things much more than 10K years ago, it is just too unreliable.
Logical, and it was there all along, so obvious, brilliant !thanks
Duuuuude duuude duuude duuude😱😱😱, i cant contain the amount of hypothesis , your hitting me with💫💫 , but i waaaaant more , don't stop , this is so dam mind blowing.....💣💥💥💀
Great view on Menkaure, I believe you’ve nailed it. Still think Khafre originaly was a trunkated one at half its height and that the core of khufu is older than any pyramid.
A lot of things where left there to be discovered when they came waging war from the south. Arid climate and sediments flooding the Nile came gradually as did the huge constructions over aquifers which seems to have become a global technology a verry long time ago.
Great telling mate.. I loved it
Thank you, Lee.
Some real info to think on. Thank you for sticking with the facts..and raising theory based on the facts not what people have said over centuries!
I like to read the old books to see what was recorded. To get the facts. Interpretation is then up to anyone, who can fit the pieces into a narrative. We don’t have all the pieces so we have to do our best when we attempt it.
It's so cool to look at these artifacts & plainly see that the Egyptians had an advanced knowledge of geometry & the proportions of beauty. You see this translated in Greek art, less so in Roman art, etc. It is more evidence suggesting the degeneration of knowledge of a once Great Civilization, like Atlantis. I love this stuff, thank you for all your research & efforts in this channel, Man.
Very interesting video. I like the summary in the end. That structures at Giza were rebuilt, extended an reused overtime sounds plausible to me.
Cheers
A fact mentioned by many is, the trouble the dynastic egyptians had scratching granite with their chissels, which is a way to distinguish what they built, from what they found already there.
I really like the hypothesis that the great pyramid was an ark of sorts that allowed a species that faced impending extinction to live on. 🌚
Great work :)
Much love from Salop.
Thank you
Excellent review, perfectly structured reflection and excellently thought-out hypothesis Matt, as usual !
Late yeasterday I came across the short comment of "MrCripian" and your reply, concerning the presumed Cheops cartouche in the GP. Since the subject is quite burning and of great interest to me, I dug it deeper a few weeks ago and I found interesting elements about this matter in an interview of the German archeologist Dominique Görlitz on the German TV channel Nuo Visio. This scientist had been accused of having illegaly damaged this cartouche during an April 2013 visit he made inside the discharge chambers above the so-called King's room and sentenced to a 5 years prison term by an Egyptian court. in the wake of it. However, this accusation was fully fabricated by Z.Hawass and his henchmen, and the gentleman was declared fully innocent by the same court in 2015, thanks among other things images of the cartouches and their marks taken by Pr.Schoch in 2006 which were provided to him by R.Bauval. These pictures are the proof that the damages (4 chisel marks which can be seen on your video between 2.36 and 2.43) were made between 2004 (at this date another photo shows no marks) and 2006 !!!
Here are the most important points put forward by D.Görlitz in his interview:
- he indeed took some microscopic (
Someone needs to help spread your summary, and I would be interested in reading it with that aim in mind. sciencetheory.wordpress.com/category/ancient-mysteries-ufos-e-t-technology/ Facebook; adrien.nash.9
the two pyramids in the steele clearly indicate Menkaure and Khafre, not Khufu, which is more logically a later-comer in the order they were build. If you ran Egypt, you would build from small to large, and the Khufu pyramid is the most developed in terms of architectural design. Makes more sense that Egyptians worked from less complicated to more complicated...
Good video something to think about!
Your spoiling us !
😊
Idk, my intuition tells me there is more to the Menkaure pyramid. That is a HUGE structure. I just don't buy that it is one chamber.
There are two chambers
@@Mateyhv1 ah! Yes
@@user-co4xl7wx3q lol, the writing of your nick is cool, how is it read and what does it mean?
a really good one !
Thank you
excellent research and thought
Thank you
You make my mind work overtime thinking about the great information you provide. It's a welcome break from the world problems of today. Thank you.
Thanks
The more we (you) look the more we know, keep it up!👍😎
Thank you
"which give us the true history of the pyramids,in truth we do not know the history" love that part
Looooved it!!! 😍
I NAILED the Hello Everybody timing !!!
The Great Pyramid is on another level than any of the other pyramids. Also, it’s interior chambers are made up of 5 different types of granite. It’s absolutely plausible that it’s the only structure older than everything on the Giza plateau. It’s been renovated and reworked with newer additions which makes it harder to understand what era it was originally constructed.
dude ur a machine your knowledge is impeccable i love this i praise the day when we ALL teach our kids the truth
Thanks.... Been working hard last couple of months!
@@AncientArchitects it shows kudos bro
I don't know if this supposition is correct, but it does seem at least plausible and logical to me that the structures had different phases and functions through history and, for example, it's reasonable to conclude the multiple entrances, etc. indicate multiple phases with multiple architects, as opposed to concluding one architect changed plans halfway through as if they couldn't plan things out beforehand.
Thanks for your comment
What about the Peru style blocks on the pyramid of Menkaure? When were they placed?
If I remember correctly, the Great pyramids outer parts could be dated to Narmers period at 3100 bc by dating the mortar used. Is there any similar datings for the stonework on the two other pyramides?
Yes, apparently so, from the original round of carbon dating from matter between the stones on the outside. I’m not sure this method is all that reliable for these monuments, sadly.
Nice one
Cheers 👍
What do the sphinx boxes have to say about the new smaller sizes of the pyramids? Do they still line up roughly the same way or do the lines change where they land?
Well they don’t line up with Menkaure‘ as expected. But they do line up with the larger size Khafre, as expected, if it was enlarged at the same time the Sphinx was renovated
Thank you Matt♥️⛰♥️👏🏼👏🏼👍🏼I like the falcon head theory 👏🏼👏🏼👍🏼
Thanks Lynn
Hey by the way, they apparently spelt Khufu wrong and used a mix of hieroglyphics from various eras. It's a hoax.
Could be a hoax... all in all, it’s just reliable evidence to date the structure in my opinion
@@AncientArchitects According to some reports the paint carbon dating is centuries old not Millennia - www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread985917/pg1
Maybe that explains the relatively short initial construction time :)
👍
Are you being facetious
Thank you for the clarification.
If the big pyramid has an internal ramp, do the others also have them?
We don’t know.... not as much work done on these
This is still one of yer best ones
Very fascinating! Right or wrong about this or that, it is certainly interesting to hear of alternate possibilities to the Main Stream narratives which are baseless to say the least. BUT!... there's a serious problem that needs to be addressed, and it is the fact that inexplicably, not only is the great pyramid 8-sided, but so is the small one (Menkaure), leading to the supposition that it was built that way by the same builders for the same reason.
So that fact needs to be factored into a new narrative, which seems quite difficult to do since no one has any good explanation for the 8-sided design, nor why it would be repeated many epochs later but not with the middle pyramid. Good luck with that task.
Awesome!! ☑️
As I was watching, I wondered to myself if anyone has ever looked under the sarcophagus in the great Pyramid. I'm not sure if is can be moved or not. Is it fastened to the floor or somehow built in? Just curious.
Yes... nothing there apart from a pebble. There was a pebble purposefully placed under the sarcophagus, why? We don’t know.
@@AncientArchitects
Very interesting. Thank you for this reply!
@@AncientArchitects typo: "peddle" = pebble
@luminous life I think it was a chip of granite, probably inadvertently situated where workers turned the box back onto its bottom. Who knows, maybe gun powdered was used to blast off the lid and the explosion flipped the box over onto its side (since the blast would have been from one side to the other, namely from the badly broken corner side) Afterward they would have re-uprighted it as they found it.
@@redwoodcoast if you put a pebble under a large and heavy object it'll become easier to move.
More excellent stuff Matt, if only there was a way to prove your theories, maybe in time and when the antiquities department come out of the dark ages things can be pieced together. Thanks.
Thanks Maureen
Wow amazing👍
Is the spot to witness the solstice sunset between the pyramids marked by something such as a mound or stone?
At 18:36 the photo shows that the Menkaure pyramid was also concaved and very likely started out as a water source. Not the only one. Perhaps all 3 were water machines of some type. Peace,
This makes sense and would explain some of the more mysterious internal design 'choices'.
Nice. Well put together, and said. Still wanting to know where your water-pump theory went.
The grotto threw me a bit with that. I never revisited it as I’m still looking for more evidence. The Great Pyramid function ties me in knots
Dose anyone know what the two lumps are under the Sphinxs chin
the short answer is "no".
you have i can hear it!!!! lol amazing work! i wonder if anyone else has noticed?
Honest question, what do you thinks older Sphinx or the pyramid?
I think your hypothesis makes a great deal of sense. The Great Pyramid has not been changed as evidenced by the 'creases' on each side which stretch from bottom to pinnacle and as you mention its construction and design is far in advance of the others. You comments on the Sphinx are also accurate in my view as the rock outcrop and obvious additions in order to make it into a lion or some other form confirm. Very good video and solid analysis.
Interesting. The main question I have is, - If the pyramids were created on this timeline and at these initial, smaller, sizes then how'd they end up being perfectly in alignment as a representation of the constellation Orion? From above, the size, spacing and alignment match Orion with a fair degree of accuracy. If they were created and rebuilt, out of sequence and over time, it would seem that they accidentally ended up matching Orion; which would be an amazing accident.
This should interest you in regard to the Orion arrangement: sciencetheory.wordpress.com/2019/03/24/what-the-pyramids-of-giza-might-signify/