bagpussDM
bagpussDM
  • 30
  • 168 643
Shahid Ali - Exposing the takfiri factory mindset
In the video we address and refute some points made in a recent video entitled "Asrar Rashid Refuted On Sulh e Kulliyyat (Collaboration With Deviants)". Unfortunately,some brothers continue their attack of other muslims under the guises of scholarship, but as yet have not addressed the accusations made against them. may Allah guide us towards the truth.
มุมมอง: 122

วีดีโอ

Shahid Ali Exposed 2
มุมมอง 7062 ปีที่แล้ว
In this video we will explore the ongoing attacks upon the scholars of Ahle Sunnah by Moulvi Aslam Bandiyaalvi and his student Shahid Ali who has allegedly been referred to as an imbecile, specifically it is the turn of Shaykh Asrar Rashid to be attacked. Is this because Shaykh Asrar refused to support their takfiri factory viz the outrageous attacks upon Hujjatul Islam and their takfir of not ...
Exposing Bandialvi's Accusations
มุมมอง 3112 ปีที่แล้ว
In this video we will explore the accusations made by Moulvi Aslam Bandiyaalvi and his groups (Qari Tayyib Naqshbandi, Qari Sabir Ali Sabir and Shahid Ali etc) against the Scholars of Islam and address the issue of whether video clip evidence can be used to establish necessary disbelief (lazoomi kufr). We will present the opinions of the former Grand Mufti Of Egypt, Mufti Aii Gomaa, who states ...
Allegations against Shahid Ali
มุมมอง 1.6K2 ปีที่แล้ว
This video deals with some social media post made between friends of Shaykh Asrar Rashid of Birmingham and Shahid Ali (Moulvi Aslam Bandialvi’s student) of Bradford, where it was alleged that Shahid Ali doctored the Brailvi Shareef fatawa by taking out the name “zaid” and adding in the name of Syed Muhammed Irfan Shah. We have included the original social media comments in this video and make i...
مولوی اسلم گروپ کا فتویٰ تبدیل کرنے کا الزام
มุมมอง 1012 ปีที่แล้ว
The video relates to some posts made on social media between Shaykh Asrar Rashid's friends and Shahid Ali (Maulvi Aslam's Student), where it was alleged that Shahid Ali had altered the Barelvi Shareef fatawa by doctoring it and including Syed Irfan Shahs name. We've included original comments in this video and make it clear that this is a serious (alleged) allegation against Maulvi Aslam, his s...
istigaatha wa tawassul Shaykh Yusuf ibn Sadiq al Athari
มุมมอง 7342 ปีที่แล้ว
Shaykh Yusuf ibn Sadiq al Masri, deals with the the issue and controversy surrounding (istigaatha - Seeking intermediaries) and tawassul (Seeking help) according to the four madaahib (Hanafi, Shaaf3e, malikiyyah and Hambali). he offers the correct authentic opion regarding these matters in the light of mainstream sunni Islam
Exposing Moulvi Aslam and group
มุมมอง 3632 ปีที่แล้ว
This video is not to cause any fitna (discord or disunity) that door has already been opened by Moulvi Bandiyaali, his student Shahid Ali (who we will insha'Allah deal with later in a separate video), Qari Tayyib Naqshbandi, Qari Saabir Ali and their small group, but to clarify some matters, so the public can become aware of the facts and the truth behind the personal attacks upon Hujjatul isla...
Brailvi Fatawa has nothing to do with Syed Irfan Shah
มุมมอง 912 ปีที่แล้ว
This video deals with the confusion and controversy caused by some individuals who obtained a fatawa (religious decree) from the Dar ul Ifta at Mazhur ul Islam, Brailvi Shareef and now are now using this fatawa to make personal attacks upon al Shaykh, Pir Syed Muhammed Irfan Shah Mashhadi daman barkatum aliyyah and his followers. This video documents their claims and allegations regarding the f...
God, Jesus & the New testament YouTube
มุมมอง 616 ปีที่แล้ว
In this series of video, John Paul Love III (Judeo-Christian Monotheist) explores some critical core beliefs of Christianity from its birth to modern day and asks some serious questions regarding Christian theology and Christology. Uploaded with permission from Brother Lee Love productions
Darwinian Evolution a religion
มุมมอง 386 ปีที่แล้ว
Are Islam and Darwinian Evolution compatible? Lecture given by Subboor Ahmed I iERA Please not I did not shoot this video, but have re-posted the lecture because I feel a lot of people can derive benefit from it, both religious and no religious alike and through proper critique of our understanding both science and religion we can find common shared ground
Kemet refuting all there is is Energy
มุมมอง 876 ปีที่แล้ว
When “white slave masters” stopped taking Africans as slave the white European philanthropists and abolitionists attempted to put Christianity into Africa to maintain colonies subservient to them, so as to maintain a power base within Africa, so they could mine the oil, cobalt and minerals. They strategized that it would be better to Christianize the black man and pacify him in his own land. To...
Understanding Kemet
มุมมอง 3156 ปีที่แล้ว
This is a short video exploring the origins of Kemetic Philosophy and the claim that original source knowledge of kemetic Philosophy the Medu Neter has not been fully or properly translated Music: Yuki Murata - Star (official music video)
christians and praying
มุมมอง 29711 ปีที่แล้ว
How should Christians pray according to their bible? is there any evidence in the bible or early Christian history that may suggest that Muslims pray in a way that is similar to the prophets or traditions that can be found in the bible? In this short video i will explore these questions
Allahleg Channel reply 5 - Misunderstanding forgiveness
มุมมอง 9511 ปีที่แล้ว
This is the final part of a multiple part video response to Christian Prince video "allahaleg's channel", in which he presents opinions, conjecture, personal assertions and arguments that are argumentum ad populum and Ad Hominem attacks based upon nothing more then his poor understand, conjecture assertions and deficient logic.
Allahleg Channel reply 4 - debunking crazy logic
มุมมอง 14911 ปีที่แล้ว
This part 5 of a multiple part video response to Christian Prince video "allahaleg's channel", in which he presents opinions, conjecture, personal assertions and arguments that are argumentum ad populum and Ad Hominem attacks based upon nothing more then his poor understand, conjecture assertions and deficient logic.
Allahleg Channel reply 3 - Ignorance unveiled
มุมมอง 7711 ปีที่แล้ว
Allahleg Channel reply 3 - Ignorance unveiled
Allahleg Channel reply 2 - Lies regarding Shirk
มุมมอง 4511 ปีที่แล้ว
Allahleg Channel reply 2 - Lies regarding Shirk
Allahleg Channel reply 1
มุมมอง 5411 ปีที่แล้ว
Allahleg Channel reply 1
Bible scholar tells the truth about Christianity
มุมมอง 133K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Bible scholar tells the truth about Christianity
Ex christian telling the truth about the Bible
มุมมอง 24K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Ex christian telling the truth about the Bible
Who is Paul 2-2
มุมมอง 2311 ปีที่แล้ว
Who is Paul 2-2
Who is Paul 1-2.
มุมมอง 3511 ปีที่แล้ว
Who is Paul 1-2.
God Jehovah and YHWY
มุมมอง 23211 ปีที่แล้ว
God Jehovah and YHWY
Jesus in the New Testament
มุมมอง 4611 ปีที่แล้ว
Jesus in the New Testament
Sam Shamoun runs away from a debate
มุมมอง 2.3K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Sam Shamoun runs away from a debate
Confused Christian Evangelist
มุมมอง 12811 ปีที่แล้ว
Confused Christian Evangelist
Origins of the Gospel of John
มุมมอง 2.2K11 ปีที่แล้ว
Origins of the Gospel of John
Divinity of Christ and altering of the New Testament
มุมมอง 8711 ปีที่แล้ว
Divinity of Christ and altering of the New Testament
Salvation through Jesus
มุมมอง 11011 ปีที่แล้ว
Salvation through Jesus
Response & Challange to Christian Prince
มุมมอง 42411 ปีที่แล้ว
Response & Challange to Christian Prince

ความคิดเห็น

  • @thedude9741
    @thedude9741 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    who was he debating?

  • @hermonmeasho6778
    @hermonmeasho6778 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    He was there to debate about the Quran he said it himself, how do you expect him to drbate about irrelevant topic? If the Muslim wanted to debate about old testament why didnt he arrange the debate in the first place? he agreed to talk about quran and then change to old testament and you accuse Sam of running? Come on

  • @michaelleesinfah892
    @michaelleesinfah892 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is called “running”? Click baits existed even 10 years ago huh

    • @farazansari9382
      @farazansari9382 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is running and hiding😂😂😂 th-cam.com/users/shorts_mhXNy7V5fU?si=FNAkN-6Kz18kE0hw

  • @Journeytothefather
    @Journeytothefather หลายเดือนก่อน

    He didn't run, even the guy said it he chose to debate with his own words so don't try to put other things in your mouth

  • @agumebrian7200
    @agumebrian7200 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even non christian historians recorded Jesus death and resurrection and this mad man acknowledges that

  • @Zainismaster
    @Zainismaster ปีที่แล้ว

    he also ran away 10 years later LMAO

    • @thedude9741
      @thedude9741 หลายเดือนก่อน

      sheikh uthman is his biggest nightmare😂🤣🤣

  • @brisadelcastillo2840
    @brisadelcastillo2840 ปีที่แล้ว

    "THE CRUCIFIX FISH TESTIFIES" look it up. This proves beyond doubt that the crucifixion and resurrection happened, and how.

  • @reborninchrist8074
    @reborninchrist8074 ปีที่แล้ว

    Here my answer 1) He confessed himself that the Bible was written by the eye witnesses of Jesus, and later it was translated by others in different different languages for different different regions, but the main thing is there is uniformity in all the early and later bible, you can see it and compare it yourself (like the dead sea scroll) 2) his 2nd question, Can eye witnesses be trust worthy? If you read the Bible you won't ask this question, the torah(old testament) was written by the help of the holy spirit of God by moses, of the time of Adam to Jacob, and also in New testament Jesus said "Whatever i said it will be to much for you to bear and remember, so i will send holy spirit and he will remind you of everything i said to you! So eye witnesses of the Jesus the Apostles are trust worthy! 2) He said bible isnot trust worthy, while all the historical, archaeological and evidencial record shows its authenticity and validity! In conclusion my dear brother don't become the lost sheep of the gospel of Matthew!

  • @maloWRLD
    @maloWRLD ปีที่แล้ว

    whole lot of ignorants from christians in the comments using lazy arguments to attempt to combat this mans points 😭

  • @Gggg-cq1ih
    @Gggg-cq1ih ปีที่แล้ว

    He wasn't a born again Christian, he was cultural Christian.

  • @peterharris6604
    @peterharris6604 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks.

  • @SRS675
    @SRS675 ปีที่แล้ว

    Satan is speaking thru this goat

  • @maltesetony9030
    @maltesetony9030 ปีที่แล้ว

    Right-on!!

  • @user-KT304
    @user-KT304 ปีที่แล้ว

    This man is telling so many lies.

    • @milad8255
      @milad8255 ปีที่แล้ว

      proof him wrong then. Christianity is just a bunch of lies.

  • @onlytruth6337
    @onlytruth6337 ปีที่แล้ว

    He says " whe I was an evangelican xtian". this is a lie. he never believed in Jesus and his resurrection. He can not explai why he "beieved" in the Son and his resurrection coz he never believed this. The exxtians dont exist. His first phrase, his first lie.

  • @zenadineallan5220
    @zenadineallan5220 ปีที่แล้ว

    A very stupid argument

  • @raysalmon6566
    @raysalmon6566 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is just downright sad i have read BE quite a bit and he is so educated that he got lost in the woods

  • @gospeljoy5713
    @gospeljoy5713 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    He calls humans to love God the Father with everything to have radical love for him love your neighbor as yourself and love your enemies.

  • @gospeljoy5713
    @gospeljoy5713 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    For God sent his son jesus into the world to condemn the world but that the world through him might he saved. For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son jesus that whosoever should not perish but have eternal life. Jesus came to reveal God as a loving heavenly father. Jesus demonstrated compassion on many different people. He said he is the good shepherd that gives his life for the sheep. He shared God is loving good kind and merciful as well as righteous and holy.

  • @suvi_exchristian
    @suvi_exchristian 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I left CHRISTIANITY 7 years ago. I'm a Hindu now 🕉️

  • @micahjoelgeimer4215
    @micahjoelgeimer4215 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I left the church and christianity 18 years ago, and through therapy and proper self education I am still finding things about the bible and Christianity that I had learned in childhood to either be blatant lies, or toxic manipulation, coercion, contradictory and just downright false. It all started when I really just read the bible like a book, asking lots of questions and doing proper research. Read your bible, and instead of asking your priest, pastor or what have you, do the research instead, read books, listen to other people(non evangelicals). IF the "god" of the bible is real, it is not a devine or benevolent being, and would I be careful if I were you about inviting negative energy to live in your heart and cause fear and hatred to fester, as well as praying for others. Praying to this "god" of the bible with malicious or negative intent is really quite dangerous and karma may come around to dump that on you when you least expect it. Meditate, and find the Universe within you

  • @phranchesskahr
    @phranchesskahr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does it matter who the Gospels were supposedly written by and so on if we have real life changing experiences and our lives are immeasurably changed as we walk with Jesus day by day and come to know him personally on a deep level ? I don't get it . As someone below mentioned "We can't believe anything we're told about the past" . The Bible is a spiritual text not a historical text , and the Spirit is definitely real

  • @TryHARD-du9hj
    @TryHARD-du9hj 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Bible is a book of prophecy. The Bible is true because it is literally predicting the future and what is happening today. God provided us with a book so we can seek him and follow. It is a shame though that modern versions of the Bible are changed.

  • @SS-np4og
    @SS-np4og 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm not here to defend any manipulation by either party but shouldn't the same criteria apply to statements of Asif Jalali whereas you refer to his statements as disgusting etc, whereas that's just one clip that was used with no context. I think the whole thing was based either more on an emotional response or some personal grudge against him (I.E. Asif Jalali) Why is it that the same principle about video and context wasn't applied there? And then you refer to Aslam Bandyalvi and his group as takfeeri whereas those speaking against Asif Jalali were the first ones to do takfeer and call him an illegitimate child and all sorts of things. I think the whole takfeer game was initiated by that group and that whole personal attack him and his mother was really unasked for. It should've just been a matter of proving proofs against his narrative and not swearing at him.

    • @bagpussDM
      @bagpussDM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @S S you train of thought is logical and fair in the general sense, but when it come to Dr Asif lahori the matter is diametrically apposed,let me explain why in regards to Dr Asif you are wrong. When Dr sahib made his statements, other ulema spoke with him to clarify what he meant by "Khata", once realizing what ulema were pointing to he then said he meant "khata ul ijtihadi", and did a few other speaches to say thats what he meant (his wazaat) these are all available to watch and view. Not withstanding his own wazaats (clarifications) that he stood by the word khata for sayyidah paak radi allahu ta'ala anha. Ulema when to him to discuss the matter, first one was Allama Kokab noorani Okarvi majda zeedu sharfuhu, in fact he spent the whole day in lahore trying to resolve the matter. When he sat with him Dr Asif said "who are you you are the son of a naat khawaan go and fetch someone who is on my level", when Dr Kokab tried to broach the matter with him. After this a group of Senior ulema (akabir) including Dr asif sahib's ustaad (mufti fazal sahib), Shaykh ul hadeeth Allama Abdus Sattar sahib, Mufti Syed naveed-ul_hasan Shah went to Dr Asif lahori, he would not except that he had erred in his comments, in fact he told them to go do one in the end after which Mufti fazal refused to acknowledge him as his student. This is on the record. then a fatawa of ghumrahee was passed upon him, so you see the situation regarding dr asif lahori is different from that of moulvi bandiyaalvi and his group. The is a strong allegation levelled at them that they were the ones who have tampered with the brailvi fatawa and in doing so have brough not just ahle sunnah into dispute but the honourabe name of brailvi shareef.

  • @spellczech8591
    @spellczech8591 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys lol

  • @jamiaislamiarizvia786
    @jamiaislamiarizvia786 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Deviants are trying to lie, twist and defend Irfan Shah Mashhadi who has a fatwa against him from Bareilly Sharif. May Allah Almighty guide these people back to the right path and protect us from their evil. کچھ گمراہ لوگ جھوٹ و فریب سے عرفان شاہ مشہدی کا دفاع کر رہے ہیں جبکہ اس پر بریلی شریف کا فتوی لگا ہوا ہے۔ اللہ عزوجل ان لوگوں کو صراط مستقیم پر لوٹنے کی توفیق عطا فرمائے اور ہمیں ان کے شر سے محفوظ رکھے۔ th-cam.com/video/JseeEVZ9gVQ/w-d-xo.html

    • @bagpussDM
      @bagpussDM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      (1) Which deviants are you talking about? please quantify your statement 2) Mufti Saleem Rizvi Sahib from Brailvi Shareef is on the record stating that, no one was been named within the fatawa or the accusation, the fatawa was given on zaid's names not Syed Muhammed Irfan shah mashhadi for your reference please view this video th-cam.com/video/7n2j9P1ipbw/w-d-xo.html what kind or type of fatawa is the brailvi shareef fatawa? is it mutlaqun, 3aam, shar3ee, fiqhi, before you suggest its upon any person you must clarify this and then provide the evidences for their kufr. (3) regarding video clip being used as hujjah, please provide a valid sharee3 reasoning and clarify what the conditions are for the use of video evidence, when video can be distorted, onus is upon you to provide the evidence. (4) According to Bilal bin Aref Shahid Ali has the one that doctored the Brailvi fatawa, so how can it be binding this is for you to clarify i would suggest you should advice Moulvi Aslam and shahid Ali to stop their takfiri factory.

  • @jamiaislamiarizvia786
    @jamiaislamiarizvia786 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Deviants are trying to lie, twist and defend Irfan Shah Mashhadi who has a fatwa against him from Bareilly Sharif. May Allah Almighty guide these people back to the right path and protect us from their evil. کچھ گمراہ لوگ جھوٹ و فریب سے عرفان شاہ مشہدی کا دفاع کر رہے ہیں جبکہ اس پر بریلی شریف کا فتوی لگا ہوا ہے۔ اللہ عزوجل ان لوگوں کو صراط مستقیم پر لوٹنے کی توفیق عطا فرمائے اور ہمیں ان کے شر سے محفوظ رکھے۔ th-cam.com/video/JseeEVZ9gVQ/w-d-xo.html

    • @just2goodpeace22
      @just2goodpeace22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But who are Brillo shareef

    • @just2goodpeace22
      @just2goodpeace22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Since when has Breli dept become world fatwa organisation, come on man please stop the bull

  • @NasirAli-zn3hr
    @NasirAli-zn3hr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tell shahid ali to travel and learn Islamic literature

  • @NasirAli-zn3hr
    @NasirAli-zn3hr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Badali’s shut it you guys have no knowledge shahid ali is nothing have some respect for sh asrar. You Badali’s are lost

  • @nasmoh7182
    @nasmoh7182 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dodgy fatwas? fraudulent and deceptive? Well they learnt that from thier leader Raza Khan brelvi. What goes around, comes around.

    • @bagpussDM
      @bagpussDM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      not at all Nas this has nothing to do with the Erudite Imam, in fact Moulvi Ashraf Ali Thanwi in his own book states that when he heard that Imam Ahmed radha Khan had ppassed away, he asked his students to make fateHa,one of the students said but he declared you a kafir, Thanwi sahib said if he didn't do that he would have become a kafir himself. Ikhtilaaf amongst ulema is possible, but those masa'il should never have been brought into the public arena, so this video has nothing to do with the brailvi deobandi schism, but the conduct of certain so called mullahs distorting the picture to suit their political or personal agendas

  • @nasmoh7182
    @nasmoh7182 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shows the fanaticism of the brelvi sect. Apparently Asrar Rasheed is now a deobandi lol due to him not adhering strictly to the brelvi aqaid.

    • @bagpussDM
      @bagpussDM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What Shaykh Asrar believes thats his business, what will you say about messer penfold and danger mouse of "alislam productions", who are also like a takfiri factory?

  • @just2goodpeace22
    @just2goodpeace22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The innovators will eventually break and become lost. Fact

    • @bagpussDM
      @bagpussDM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      sifting out the wheat from the chaff, the unfortunate thing is when so called scholars are going around like the judge and jury condemning others.

    • @just2goodpeace22
      @just2goodpeace22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bagpussDMdo we have a list of brelwi shareef scholars who have been granted access to pray inside kabah shareef??

    • @bagpussDM
      @bagpussDM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@just2goodpeace22 I don't know where you going with your question? (1) when you say Brelwi scholars what do you mean by this please define what you mean by this? if you are referring to the schism between the indian wahhabis (Deobandi,ahlul hadeeth & tablighi jamaat) and the Ahle sunnah of india who's Imam was Ahmed Radha Khan alayhi rahma, in that case that was a scholarly dispute based upon aqa'id and should be left to the ulema to resolve not lay people like you and I. The major problem as i see it or i have read it, was caused by Jamaati tableegh in india, so those intellectual and scholarly discussion or disputes (mas'ala's) where brough amongst the lay people (joe public) who have zero clue about sirf nahw, lughat, blaghat, usool basically islamic sciences, so could not differentiate between haq wa batil, so roll on 80-90 years and we have takfiri factories every where, impressionable people on all side who studied in mudarsay and have zero clue about life outside of a madarsah and thus their judgements are clouded by the mantra "we are on the right way". No one has the right to claim haq except Allah jalla shaanuhu and whoever Allah has bestowed haq upon (mujaazi), these are the great ulema and mashaykh. instead of going down the road of brelwi this wahhabi that, when did these schisms start 200 years ago 250 years ago? ok so let the scholars go back 300 years when there is agreed unity within muslims and return people to that. catch my drift

  • @MarvinMontana
    @MarvinMontana 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are the same person who made a issue with imam Asim. You sheikh asrar is the fitna in ahlus sunnah Wal jammmah

    • @MarvinMontana
      @MarvinMontana 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@navnavo1414 Oh Woopdi Dooo it's a Keyboard warrior..

    • @ErtugrulGhazi-de7cm
      @ErtugrulGhazi-de7cm 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Said straight

    • @bagpussDM
      @bagpussDM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mo i have nothing to do with Shaykh Asrar Rashid, what he does is his business, I am just highlighting the behaviour of the takfiri factories

    • @bagpussDM
      @bagpussDM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@navnavo1414 please be respectful when you make comments here, shaykh Asrar Rashid and Shaykh Asim are not here to defend themselves.Please have Husan Zan and keep the discussion scholarly, respect, and to the point

    • @MarvinMontana
      @MarvinMontana 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bagpussDM so why make a video if it has nothing to do with you? You have interest in one causing more fitna or two some financial reward to discredit a group of individuals

  • @siannicole1917
    @siannicole1917 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Christianity is not a religion, it is a personal relationship with our Lord and Saviour Lord Jesus Christ!

  • @siannicole1917
    @siannicole1917 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Proverbs 13:13 “He who despises the Word will be destroyed, but he who fears the commandment will be rewarded.”

    • @bagpussDM
      @bagpussDM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jesus reminded people that God was ready to forgive anyone who repented of their sins and asked for forgiveness. Here are some examples: The Lord's Prayer (Matthew 5:9-14)

    • @panes840
      @panes840 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bagpussDM yes but this chap probably won't be wanting to change his mind I suspect soooo.

    • @mooshei8165
      @mooshei8165 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But Christians broke everyone of them.

  • @siannicole1917
    @siannicole1917 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bible is not given to just to give us knowledge, but to change our lives.

    • @bagpussDM
      @bagpussDM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes in the beginning of Christianity this would be true, however Biblical scholars over the past 200 years have stated from evidence and through textual criticism of manuscript evidence that the bible is some what unreliable i would suggest you get your self educated because it will help develop a better understanding of the bible and its limitations. You can watch any of these Sian - th-cam.com/video/gwKK__LnSSI/w-d-xo.html - th-cam.com/video/1mtbJqRTW9M/w-d-xo.html - th-cam.com/video/irXmYJby0DQ/w-d-xo.html - th-cam.com/video/ZSrBpYDIu3I/w-d-xo.html

  • @bathsheba41
    @bathsheba41 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This man was never a Christian. You are a devil worshippers.

    • @bagpussDM
      @bagpussDM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      he has stated on many occasions he was christian, in fact went to the best bible school in America and after study decided that Christianity wasn't for him, that's his choice, but it is factually in correct to state he was never a Christian LOL. when you ready the bible critically from a textual criticism perspective you realise there are issue, now there are either a couple of option you can do at that point; (1) Accept that there are errors,mistakes and textual problems with the bible we have.but still accept the narrative to be true. (2) Accept that there are errors,mistakes and textual problems with the bible we have.but still accept the narrative to be false (3) reject biblical scholarly appraisals of the bible that expose certain inaccurate points and critical errors and take the bible as is 100% without question.

  • @peterhwang1860
    @peterhwang1860 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did this guy even read the Gospel of John? How can he say that the author did not claim to be an eyewitness. He never brought out any evidence to support his view, just saying that he doesn't think the current evidence is enough to convince him of the traditional view.

    • @sleeexs
      @sleeexs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Robert No.

    • @sleeexs
      @sleeexs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Robert It isn't. Check into it

    • @sleeexs
      @sleeexs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Robert Snow falls from the sky

    • @sleeexs
      @sleeexs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Robert It's history You have a long way to go before obtaining mature mind

    • @sleeexs
      @sleeexs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Robert Its factual history Nature didn't give you a brain

  • @SinghisKing791
    @SinghisKing791 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This always disturbs me why is Abrahamic God ( Allah /Christ ) so much insecure of his position as Almighty ; that he considers any other worhsip apart from him suitable for an Eternal Hell..This God sounds Egoist ; Jealous ; Insecure to me...but as per One Suprme God of Vedas ; God says who worhship other Gods also worship him in Worng way and God says he is one who makes their Faith steady because as per Vedic Religon God is very open hearted and Free of all forms of hate and Envy and jealousy.. ..this makes more sense to me ...And God of Vedas is more interested in Relationship than Sectarian Religon..he is more interested in our Purity than our Rituals.. The Western monotheistic traditions frequently depict God to be jealous; he forbids the worship of any other gods and even approves the destruction of their places of worship. In contrast, the Bhagavad-gita reveals a God who is not jealous but is zealous. Krishna as God is concerned not about guarding his position as the exclusive object of worship, but about facilitating the spiritual evolution of everyone. Knowing that some spiritually under-evolved people won’t be ready to worship him, he arranges for them to worship other gods - a worship that can serve as a starting spur for the spiritual journey of those souls. Krishna as God is concerned not about guarding his position as the exclusive object of worship, but about facilitating the spiritual evolution of everyone. Souls in their spiritual kindergarten, by acknowledging the need to worship some being greater than themselves, begin the process for kindling the mood of devotion towards the Supreme. Krishna assists them by strengthening their faith in the demigods (07.21) and by empowering the demigods to bless according to that faith (07.22). Nowhere in the Gita does Krishna endorse violent intolerance towards other gods - a defining feature of the jealous God. No doubt, Krishna unambiguously describes his supreme position as the source of all the gods (10.02). And he also unequivocally urges everyone to give up all other forms of worship and surrender to him alone (18.66). Does this call demonstrate his jealousness? No, it too demonstrates his zealousness, albeit in a different, more direct way. This call expresses Krishna’s compassionate desire that souls who are ready to worship him return to him as quickly as possible by taking the best path for their spiritual growth: the path of pure devotional service to him. Thus, both in arranging for the worship of other gods and in endorsing his exclusive worship, Krishna demonstrates the same zealousness for others’ elevation - a zealousness customized according to their level of receptivity. Watch 10 major Lies of Zakir Naik about Hindusim debunked th-cam.com/video/bi40cpbsVP0/w-d-xo.html Note :: This is not a Sadhguru answer ; this is different edited Video.. Article written by ( Pakistani Writer based in U.K ) Khalid Umar FOR MY MUSLIM FRIENDS - AN INVITATION FOR INTELLECTUAL ENQUIRY QURAN VS BHAGVAT-GITA When it comes to religious matters, there are always debates and discussions as to which is the perfect religion that guides towards salvation and teaches one to be a perfect human being. Presenting facts about religion is a tough task as most of them try to hide the shortcomings of one's religion. But what is not to be forgotten is truth cannot be hidden and by some means it will prove its existence. There are much arguments about Quran and Bhagavad Gita, considering there complete contradictory nature. Muslims have always argued that the Quran is the only path to see God, while Hindus believe that attaining salvation (moksha) is equivalent to seeing God which can be achieved by developing good deeds. HOLY QURAN 1. Quran says: Islam is the only true religion. The God gets upset when one “sets up partners in worship with Him” (Quran, 4:116). 2. Only those who believe in Quran can go to heaven. And there is no place than hell for Kafirs (non-believers). Allah punishes people those who worship other Gods which is described in the words….“Lâ ilâha illa Huwa” (No one should be worshiped other than Allah) (Quran, 6:102). 3. Quran describes Muslims are the only rightful people and raised for mankind (Quran, 3:110). Heaven is the ultimate goal of life and every man should try to get it in their life. 4. Quran says followers needs to fear him and if followed, he will grant reward (Quran 65.5). It also describes that every Muslim should perform 5 times prayer, go to Haj, if not, ready to face fire in hell. The book also says, “Unless I proclaim what I receive from Allah and His Messages: for any that disobey Allah and His Messenger,- for them is Hell: they shall dwell therein for ever.” (Quran 72.23) 5. Quran says, that Muslims must obey Allah and his guidance and anyone who intends to follow other religion will never be accepted (Quran 3.85). NOW LETS US LOOK AT WHAT BHAGAVAT GITA SAYS… 1. Bhagavad Gita doesn’t believe in self centered attitude. The Lord says, I am in everyone’s heart as a soul. “As soon as one desires to worship some demigod, I make his faith steady so that he can devote himself to that particular deity.” (Bhagavad-Gita, 7:21). 2. Gita mentions that there is only one God, but people see him in different forms (Bhagavad-Gita, 7:22). 3. The Gita says “He is a perfect yogi who, by comparison to his own self, sees the true equality of all beings, in both their happiness and their distress, O Arjuna!” (Bhagavad-Gita, 6:32). It says Karma will decide ones fate and religion, heaven and hell has no meaning in Gita. 4. Krishna says, do not fear me, do your duties and your work will protect you ever (Bhagavad Gita 18.66). 5. Krishna says, I envy no one, nor am I partial to anyone. I am equal to all. But whoever renders service unto Me in devotion is a friend, is in Me, and I am also a friend to him.(Bhagavad Gita 9.29). 6. Gita allows free thinking, All activities should be performed without attachment or expectations and as performed as duty from whole heart, That is My opinion, says Krishna (Bhagavad Gita 18.6). By saying That is my opinion, he allows free thinking and allows people to decide what is right or wrong. postcard dot news (( Note :: Bhagvad Gita also talks about Monotheistic concept of God )) Watch :: th-cam.com/video/gpYtk2iCISw/w-d-xo.html Hindu response to Islam th-cam.com/video/pSz64rIb6sE/w-d-xo.html

  • @Stateofmind00
    @Stateofmind00 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    God exist undoubtly is everywhere. Regarding Jesus i rather place my trust in Him than pretend He never existed.

    • @sleeexs
      @sleeexs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      cognitive dissonance

    • @wesleyg3088
      @wesleyg3088 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sleeexs See the letter 'I' in this words? that means that's for him and not for you. Now tf do you mean by that you idiot? Feeling superior but doesn't really have any worth Hahahahah

    • @sleeexs
      @sleeexs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wesleyg3088 I don't speak idolatry

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jesus says you will be hated in my name..I treat others how I like to be treated mostbof the time.. I am not an atheis and there is ttuth in other religions.. I am a human being and not a slug.

  • @fonkimaquinta4914
    @fonkimaquinta4914 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You admid that Jesus existed . How sure are you since you are not an eye witness?

    • @sleeexs
      @sleeexs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      facts he didnt exist

  • @genewild1356
    @genewild1356 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    They are producing ZOMBIES so they can take over their lives It’s actually death Living death People who can’t think for themselves anymore n are threatened if they do This faith is a business body in the garb of religion They are like vultures preying on the weak At least vultures have the decency of waiting till the prey dies How cruel is this practice of pouncing on vulnerable people and then trapping them in this way of cIrcle in which they will never come out Blood suckers i’d say Telling people they are sinners? Omg!! V sad While pastors live a notoriously private life God has given people brains Pl use them guys Be free, happy don’t get trapped in this faith, blood suckers They are destroying ur family by putting fear n watching them fun It’s all hypnotism, white/black voodoo See who’s having the last laugh, yes it’s the preachers/pastors U have one life Don’t let somebody dictate to u how to live it They are playing gods agents , who themselves don’t know their own future 😂

  • @MHMD_smir
    @MHMD_smir 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The problem is even christains don't follow bible. Bible never said jessus is God, and the only statment refere to the thrinity is fabricated, this mean the thrinity is a fabrication. My point is christianity is not based on bible is based in emotions.

    • @Gunz1234
      @Gunz1234 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      IT WAS TRANSALTED FROM HEBREW THEN THE WORDS ARE LOST CUZ TRANSLATING WORDS

    • @sleeexs
      @sleeexs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/play/PL3eyDZDmL7Yj4GqLrdgefnYOqa_gqNpPb.html

  • @bestrong4272
    @bestrong4272 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Idiot

  • @justinpoynter8302
    @justinpoynter8302 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you argue about accuracy then you’re wrong, because the Bible is the most accurate book EVER

  • @jasmine-jj6cv
    @jasmine-jj6cv 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fact

  • @CrazyGamerDragon64
    @CrazyGamerDragon64 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I might be inclined to agree with this guy if he could provide proof or cite sources for his reasoning. I definitely agree that God gave humans brains to use, in fact using discernment is highly encouraged in the Bible.

    • @micahjoelgeimer4215
      @micahjoelgeimer4215 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its called doing your own research, doing your due diligence, educating yourself, using your intuition and positive intention. The answers are not just going to be handed to you. I left 18 years ago, and through therapy and proper self education I am still finding things about the bible and Christianity that I had learned in childhood to either be blatant lies, or toxic manipulation, coercion, contradictory and just downright false. It all started when I really just read the bible like a book, asking lots of questions and doing proper research. Read your bible, and instead of asking your priest, pastor or what have you, do the research instead, read books, listen to other people(non evangelicals). IF the "god" of the bible is real, it is not a devine or benevolent being, and would I be careful if I were you about inviting negative energy to live in your heart and cause fear and hatred to fester, as well as praying for others. Praying to this "god" of the bible with malicious or negative intent is really quite dangerous and karma may come around to dump that on you when you least expect it. Meditate, and find the Universe within you

  • @ZinduZatism
    @ZinduZatism 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video Genius man

  • @dicklol9566
    @dicklol9566 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please stop Hate commenting abt Other religions We are not like them