วีดีโอ

Self refuting

Schismatic. Unity above all. The Pope is the Rock. Ill pray for you. We have enough.

So Jesus didn't protect the Magesterium? Then how did he preserve the Church? Philosophical schozophrenia.

The pope is the boss...accept these facts according to catholic doctrine ,the rep of a celestial being ie Jesus and his dad..I personally do not believe these celestial stories , just commenting on other people's beliefs (which are usually incorrect)..amen

The pope is irrelevant to the majority of people.The major issue is one of credility..one of belief ..folk just do not believe the stories from people thousands of years ago who veracity cannot be verified..amen

Schismatic mindset, I pray he repents.

We're leaving out a third option here. That no declarations made by these popes were ever dogmatic and therefore held no weight of infallibility. That is the position I hold. We have had good and bad popes throughout Church history. Why is now any different?

Bishop is a sedevacantist. He makes great points, but just be aware of where this Bishop is coming from. God be with you, Bishop

Che Bergoglio is paving the way for anti Christ.

Oh Jesus, please send forth your Spirit and renew the face of the earth! ❤ Thank you Holy Catholic Priests for your beautiful sermons.

Whoa! ❤

As a layman, which most Catholics are, i simply can not reason that by the 'order of law'...one who had not the authority actually did have authority to give non-Catholics the authority to elect a pope. It does not make sense to me. If God gives us wretched creatures a pope again, it will be a miracle, and we will all recognize the miracle...however He manifests it. Until then, ill try my best to live a Catholic life, raise a Catholic family, and win souls to Christ. I dont see how this topic is beneficial for the laity to immerse in the meantime. We arent canon lawyers, we struggle to carve out 30 minutes of daily devotional reading while trying to support a family. And if its not simple enough for simple Catholic to grasp, then... Ill await the miracle, even though we dont deserve one.

Is Vatican 2 a heretical counsel as it rejects one or more de fide dogmas? I dont believe our Church will recover until b8shops stop all their illicit if not invalid sacramental stewardship. It disarms parish mission and is a grave diservice.

Currently most of our hierarchy come under automatic ex communication for rejecting one or more de fide dogmas. We are in an absurd situation. I dint know a single priest or bishop who acvepts the rx cathedra of Pipe Eugene 4th in Cantate Domino. Rither the Cat Church is galse or all jrws and pagans etc go to hell umless they are united with the bisable church. Pope F signed that God wills the diversity of religions (Joint Fraternity Agrerment) . Does this mean he comes under automatic ex communication for rejecting a de fide dogma?

“Knowledge puffs up.”

Deo Gratias

Excellent.

Thank you. It gladdened my heart to hear that sin and prayer are incompatible. One will Victor 🪖

My biggest holdup with the Thesis is that if Vatican II teaches heresy (which it does), then all those who follow it are, as per 1917 CIC, ipso facto outside the Church, and have tacitly resigned their offices. This means that all those offices are, in essence vacant, because the men holding them are not Catholic. I need that explained for me to move closer to the Thesis.

great document, very well put together. Thank you!!! I started to read it. Excellent job.

I remain mostly silent and pray. More than that risks the sin of gossip, disobedience or even calumny. I believe that we are being tested by God (Tobit 12:13 Vulgate). Since the Church is not a democracy, do we pass or fail?

I love how His Excellency explains these matters. So clear, so concise and so clear. Also he foments one needs to learn and educate itself on these topics. Thank you for these clases. Thank you both. God bless you.

Thanks so much for sharing this with us!! Is it permissible for faithful to attend chapels that are staffed by the SSPV?

I am very grateful to you, your Eminence. So many of us are deprived of these understandings and logical practices defending our Church. Thank you, and God Bless you and all priests.

But what about doubtful episcopal consecrations, i.e. per Fr. Cekada analysis? How many of the Cardinals do we know for certain have been validly consecrated and thereby have authority to elect a new Pope? The Totalist position explained on website of Fr. Vili Lehtoranta makes more sense. Also, the Vatican receives plenty of money from governments and globalist nonprofits, even in US where Catholic NGOs assist with illegal border crossings. They aren't as dependent on parishioner donations any more, nor are they concerned about dropping mass attendance as the result of their modernism.

Ah I knew you were going to go the thesis route A Pope cannot be a heretic, the church has always taught a Pope cannot be a heretic, he puts himself outside the Catholic Church The 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia makes this explicitly clear even using the case of John XXIII as an example stating that the heretic vacates his position allowing him then to be legally deposed by the council. There is no general meeting to dispose him this is impossible and again stated in the CE, it happens automatically ipso facto! Beyond this the 1968 changes in ordination to Bishops and Priests are invalid and as per Leo XIII Apostolic Curae (as these changes went even further than the condemned Anglicans) are null and void. Furthermore Leo XIII had stated that even when the Anglicans tried to rectify the issue a century later it was too late as the hierarchy had become extent and the existing Bishops ( who were no long bishops but impostors) "had no power" Even beyond this Bergoglio is the first antipope to be ordained using these invalid rites. He is not even a priest! In all honesty you need to stop with the absurd thesis, and stick to tradition, making up things and trying to shoehorn a solution is causing more harm than good and it seems this is being driven by Sanborne , what were the thoughts of Bishop Dolan and others on this ?? Isn't to teach something that is contrary to Catholic teaching considered Heresy ???

🎯 Deo gratias

Here is how it could happen. The Cardinals elect someone they believe is a reliable modernist. Say a new Saul. That person is riding to Rome to assume his office when he is struck down by a lightning bolt and knocked from his "horse". Let's say he is blinded by the light, but after three days he miraculously recovers his sight (perhaps by the intervention of some holy person). Upon recovering his sight he declares that he now sees that he must renounce the Vatican 2 sect, repudiate the council, and restore the church. He declares all of the cardinals and priests of the Vatican 2 sect to be null and void and starts to re-ordain and re-consecrate the clergy under the traditional rites. Anyone who won't submit to this is laicized. Now, that would be something to see!

How on earth will the very cardinals who have been appointed by the false popes come to un-elect him in order to undo all of the modernist "progress" they have made since the dawn of the Ecumenical age? I don't see that happening. I am waiting for some sort of supernatural intervention.

The Cardinals, albeit heretics, have the power to un-elect Bergoglio. Unfortunately, because the Cardinals are heretics, they will never un-elect Bergoglio, barring a miracle of grace leading to their repentance and conversion.

Who is this bishop?

There is NO poope named Francis! God has no part, to say what is going on in HIS Church!

Thank you Father for this sermon. The Rotation days are largely forgotten or in most cases when they are remembered are applied principally to blessings of crops and fruits of the earth. The Church primarily instituted the Rogation Days to motivate the faithful to a greater supplication for pardon of our sins and has applied the full force of Her influence with God to obtain the pardon. It is our sins that have caused all the problems of the world. So blessing of crops, though good in itself, is of far less value then gaining pardon for sins. Pardon means forgiveness without penalty. With God this refers to temporal punishment due to sins. Purgatory is not so much a punishment as a cleansing, even if the cleansing is painful. Thinking of pardon, this is the main reason the prayers of Fatima are not in keeping with the traditional teaching of the Church. And probably why they have not been indulgenced by any Pope, in over 100 years. The one prayer has Catholics "begging pardon for those who do not believe, do not love and do not adore God". When God does not change and has said, "those who do not believe will be damned" as recorded by St Mark 16:16 and St Paul tells us, "if any man love not Our Lord, Jesus Christ, let him be anathema"(1 Cor 16:22). So are we asking God not to punish those who do not believe Him, contrary to His own words and if they do not even pretend to love Him, we ask Him not to punish them. Sounds like Universal Salvation. The other prayer, inserted in the Rosary, we are to ask the same thing. Universal Salvation, "lead all souls to heaven. Both are in keeping with the changes made in the New Mass during the Transubstantiation of the Blood when the change from many to all was made. Catholics always prayer for conversion of self and others. We pray for mercy for self and others and we may pray for pardon for ourselves and other members of the Church, but not pardon for those who refuse God's word or love. Now we have infinite dignity being applied to all men because the new theology is Universal Salvation. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

🙏🙏🙏🌹

ABSOLUTELY AMAZING AND AWESOME TRUTH 👌 ABSOLUTELY AMAZING AND AWESOME TRUTH 👌

That’s a bishop. May God protect him. May our Lady come to his assistance.

Why does he dress like a cardinal?

Sedevacantisam is heppening Right now!!! In front of our eyes. From His first - Buona sera!!!!!😜🥴🫣

Thank you, your excellency. It does stink. I am being forced to go to the NOM because there is no TLM in the place where I stay and the nearest is about 3,000 miles one way. I have this cognitive dissonance whenever I try to go to mass and fulfill my Sunday obligation but I have decided to not go to the NOM on Sundays. I hope and pray that the Lord will have mercy on my soul for taking this stance.

I have been searching for a Shepard for guidance . It appears the church has dropped the ball. No wonder the churches are all empty. Our bishops say nothing. They hide in their churches afraid to claim that Jesus is Lord.

I subscribe to the 'totalist' view of it. Will look for part 4 to see if I can make sense of how exactly non-catholics can elect one to the papacy. Since the Church is indefectibile, and those which defected were then outside the Church, then how could those outside the Church elect one to the papacy... This is the reality we are in now. All 'college of cardinal' electors are non-Catholics.

A great musical band in u- tube is Jewish Messianic Alliance Israel. Another program is - Jews for Jesus.

God Himself described bergoglio as an imposter. Meaning he is not supposed to be seated in the Petrine chair

The subjective intention of the V2 antipopes has always been the “good” of the Church, but their idea of the “good” is objectively modernist and not Catholic. Therein lies the particular defectiveness of their consent. They have not “lied” in the sense of intending to deceive. Bergoglio might be a special case, in that his subjective intention is bent on deception and thus thoroughly wicked.

It is my opinion that we have had Bad Popes since Vatican ll I also believe that there is nothing new under the sun. Historically the Church has had bad Popes before. I also believe that the Church will get through this crisis. I also believe that the growth of the TLM is playing a huge part of the Restoration of the Church. Nothing happens over night. Be vigilant and faithful to the One True Holy Catholic And Apostolic Church Of Jesus Christ. Our hope of Salvation is still here in the TLM. May The Lord Saturate Our Souls With The Holy Spirit.🔥✝️🙏

Father DeSaye, you left out one of the key requirements for a valid papacy. The man elected must be a Catholic, that is, he must be baptized, he must profess the true Faith in its entirety, and he must not have separated himself from the Church by schism, heresy, or apostasy. Lacking this, by divine law, he is not an eligible candidate for the papacy.

Sadly, the R&R position excuses the fake popes for all but ex cathedra statements.

Didn’t Frances refuse to take the title “Vicar of Christ?”