วีดีโอ

This is an incredibly clear explanation. Thank you!

this is to long for me

Come back its been a year

6:33 is the helical engine diagram

Light carries momentum. When a body at rest is hit by light momentum is transfered from the light to the body.

sir link is not working for download the slides. can you please provide slides🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Horrible expliplination and is wrong btw, a propelled airplane breaks the conservation of energy law bc it is manipulating its environment in order to move

awesome explanation. thank you so much for taking the time to share

52:00 Covariant derivative of a vector field by parallel Transport

So there's two centripetal forces acting, one pulling the top together so it won't separate, the other is radially pulling the top as one mass towards the sphere. And due to gravity being one-directional, these two interact differently. At half of the phase they move against gravity, and at another they move with gravity. This results in it favoring a certain direction on the sphere for the system to precess on. If this is true, then I believe dictating the direction of the top's movement around the sphere, in this case right-hand-ruling normal force of the system, is putting the cart fore of the donkey. I believe that it does favor a direction, because I tried spinning a pendulum out of a rope and duct tape with my right arm clockwise relative to my eyes, and it is easier to slowly spin my whole body on the y axis to the left than it is to the right. If I tried doing it to the right, usually the pendulum doesn't want to follow my arm, and gets close to the front of torso instead.

Here’s a potential hint from this layman: Casimir effect conveys what is occurring here.

Could you give me the bibliographical references that were used in this video?

Your series are seriously badass!

The solution to this problem is in this video 'How Basic Electromagnetic Propulsion Works Without Ejecting Fuel' th-cam.com/video/vicR7dbb8Us/w-d-xo.htmlsi=32m0CHI165_sQeP0

The real reactionless propulsion going on is the propulsion of intelligent men to build fancy machines that don't produce useful work (other than vibrating back and forth), much to the delight of women everywhere.

Imagining the struts as springs also helps. When a red ball of a two-top is falling downwards, it is causing a compression in the radial strut/spring, hence a pushing force from that spring which acts outward. When a red ball is moving upwards(due to it's disk type rotational motion), it is causing the spring/strut to stretch and hence a pulling force from the spring which acts inward. I wonder what happens to Positronium rotating like a disk and then an electric field is switched on parallel to the axis of rotation.

I think the first part is wrong: xcm is not (i/m)t but it is proportional to t^2. You started from m*d/dx(xcm)=i and then you integrate respect to time forgetting that i is not constanct respect time since i=Ft so when you integrate you have: xcm=F/m*(t^2/2)

The principle of NASA's Helical Engine work , and it works very well, here is the proof th-cam.com/video/VXS56lRwrys/w-d-xo.html

How does Noether's Theorem explain time differences in a closed system on earth, in empty space or at a black hole's event horizon?

For a discussion of why the helical drive will not work, see m.th-cam.com/video/yNro9yiVZno/w-d-xo.html

Okay but you barely explained going frok one step to another

So from where momentum comes in Casimir effect? There are many things we do not know ...

Question ● have any of these drives been tested in the vaccum of space ?

they won't work? Even though objects are seen working.and are filmed?

Do you happen to have an INTUITIVE explanation for the Intermediate Axis Theorem? Feynman said "No." And my teacher and Einstein always said that if they can't explain it in common sense terms to the laypersons then chances are that they don't know what they are talking about.

Дятел ! ... здесь нет даже разницы перевеса грузов ( на 9 .00 и на 15.00 ) ! )) и даже малейшей попытки его нарушить .. !

You forgot about Russian engineer Tolchin

We want to go to America for families and friends and relatives and clans please help me with the issue

Gerak rotasi gasing Terhadap vertikal simestris jadi gaya gaya yg dihasilkan juga simetris,akan tetapi gravitasi hanya bernilai positif ke arah bawah sedangkan untuk ke arah atas negatif... Jadi bagaimana anda menerangkan hal ini???

I gotta let you know that there's other TH-camrs that are 🤏 close to free energy; really! And their NEXT build iteration will achieve it, they absolutely promise.(That is, if the blackhats finally stop sneaking in their house at night and sabotaging everything).

If there’s some kind of drag, in the component of x axis, there’s a way… I know u can’t see that, maybe you can make extreme examples. Maybe it will work, but get insane hot due to dragging. Dragging on one direction, reducing drag on the other. Maybe work for 1 second and wait 1 year for the dragging to disperse? And where the energy comes from? Better use solar wind as they already exists or some super heavy elements with large enough mass that neutrinos can interact with…. Get creative, be creative! ❤there no such thing as “empty space”

Well explained. If you take the cyan to be the equator and the red to be the north and south poles, , based on mass one axis heavier than the other, applying this rule to the earth, can you predict the period of time where the flip would occur. Does this e plain the Younger Dryas and the cataclysm described in the book ADAM & EVE? It would also seem to suggest that there could have been previous civilizations on the earth which have been completely wiped away. Exceptions being the pyramids and the Richat structure where seems remarkably precise measurements for the foundation of the city of Atlantis. Would we feel the earth wobble as the poles moved while the impending flip approached?

Why isn't this used to explain atomics theory, as the energy and electrons are more or less correctly alligned... I found if we change some views this is the level of small this might function on. The way I see it is as Molecules become larger the oscillation frequency gets larger.... It's not as though they are spinning physically but the atoms at that level always are? In a state of energy due to gravity! So what then and does anyone else think as I do? Interested to hear others opinion

Can't work. Tell that to Klacktar.

So called yellow color impossible to see

Brilliant and certainly facinating!! I enjoy this video and the excellent explanation, description and awesome visual example of the Dzhanibekov effect.

I've watched this video so many times to review the subject. Thank you for making it!

That was a nice theoretical lecture of momentum conservation. But: all our equations are based on experimental observation. So: Did anyone try it out in real life? Did anyone really build it? You can not for sure say ""it can not work"", if you even did not bother to try it. I know, it might be a waste of time and money, but hey, so many useless things were already founded in the world, (like gender equality nonsense etc.) , so why not settle this thing once and for all with some experiments...

хорошее видео- показывает как объект неправильной формы пытается найти равновесие и выбирает алгоритм поиска, но как только исчезает точка крепления, нивелирующая всё многообразие центров тяжести, возникает ХАОС, назовём его -Простейший хаос, потому что природа, в отличие от человека, всегда ищет простейший путь. и находит его, а человек , видя это, решает, что систематизировал ,, кувыркание,, предмета неправильной формы. Золотое сечение всем в помощь😎

Nice explanation, but the missing frames in the animations made my brain twitch! - LOL

I love this! Great series!!

Explain inertial drive then. Can you? If you give a serious response maybe I'll try to explain.

I don't understand how an isolated body of mass can be "rotating". Since the body is isolated, it has no reference point to which it can feel its rotation.

god damn your voice is annoying

See that’s the old way of thinking that something has to be shot out to go forward. There is other ways specially if you can create gravity fields. And let’s not forget the EM drive was tested successfully too so call it impossibly all you way it’s your understanding of conversation of momentum that’s wrong not the test results.

Can you provide solutions for the probset you gave? Thank you.

What do you think about Dr. Charles Buhler and your propellantless propulsion?

The professor was right. If he was wrong then the vehicle should keep traveling when no wind is present after an initial push. There should be a chart where at wind speed of 1 mph the cart moves at 2.7 mph, at 2 mph the cart moves at 5.4mph and so on. But this chart will never be made because it brakes the 1st law of thermal dynamics. As for the treadmill test is ludacris!if anything it is simulating a head wind. this should be able to chart on a graph as well. What do you think will happen when the treadmill goes at a walking speed? The answer is nothing will happen. To really test it they should take the most optimal small scale modle that they have created, make a wind tunnel the length of a football field where every bit of air in the tunnel flows exactly the same speed (as close as possible), have multiple readings take place throughout the tunnel to get average wind speed and then set the unit down and see if it can beat the average wind speed th get to then end. But it can't and won't. It would be cheaper to build this than that large unit but they can fudge the numbers with the large unit how fast should it go at 1mph, 2mph, 3mph. There should be a graph charting this. Wind tunnel and unit on a track is the best way to test. Keep it small like the treadmill units. Have steady wind speed. But this won't happen because it would ruin the theory. If it runs faster than the wind @ a wind speed then it should be able to run faster than the wind at 0 mph. Let me explain: If it's the wheels powering the propeller which pushes the vehicle faster than the wind then after starting the unit with a push the wheels should be able to power the propeller and push it at the same rate as when it has wind. A vehicle moving at 11 mph with a 10 mph tailwind is moving upwind at 1mph. The wind in perspective to the vehicle is now a head wind. A vehicle traveling 1 mph in no wind has a 1mph head wind. It's the same thing. Get the vehicle started with a push and it should beable to power itself. I don't think I'm missing anything but if I am please explain just rewatched the blackbird professor bet video. @12:05 the claim is made "the propeller thrust force is greater than the drag on the wheels". If this statement is true we can expect the unit to produce greater thrust force in a no wind test. Just get the vehicle started with a push and then the propeller will overpower the drag that wheels produce Im not into all the math equations but just coming from a practical standpoint imo the black bird is a hoax

Can you make a video on calculating bending angle by gauss bonnet theorem

This is so beautiful. No wonder Rutherford said everything else is stamp collecting