- 63
- 223 077
Hurricane Images
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2015
High impact imagery designed to move- move people, move companies, move ideas. Hurricane Images Inc. is an Oakland-based video production and photography company that creates powerful, compelling video and still imagery for companies and individuals. We help our clients merge marketing goals and media production. Over the past decade, we’ve garnered multiple awards and taken nearly a hundred projects from concept to final product.
The Epic SLR Magic Anamorphot 40 Review
Is the Anamorphot 40 a better choice than Sirui's 50mm T2.9 or the Great Joy 35mm? Can it compete with $9K anamorphic lenses like the Atlas Orion series? I took a deep look at the power, quirks, and shortcomings of SLR Magic's Anamorphot 40, arguably the cheapest quality-oriented option for going anamorphic and asked, "is it a professional tool or a toy?" It turned out to be a very complicated question, so I've included a ton of test footage and examples.
If you want to learn more about anamorphic lenses-- especially those that cost under ten grand, you have to check out Tito Ferradans TH-cam channel, Anamorphic on a Budget.
INDEX:
0:05 Pros and Cons Summary
0:53 Introduction - why anamorphic?
2:22 The best argument for anamorphic
3:25 Why I chose the SLR Magic Anamorphot 40
3:53 The basic specs
6:04 What it's like to use
6:32 Pricing
6:42 Making a set of anamorphic lenses
7:31 Unpredictability with individual lenses
8:26 Comparing to spherical lenses
8:53 Barrel distortion
9:12 Chromatic aberrations
10:07 Contrast
10:19 Bokeh
10:48 Sharpness
13:20 Dual focusing system
14:40 Autofocus
14:47 Focusing tip for Sony users
15:22 Viewing on cameras without anamorphic de-squeeze
15:33 Thoughts on operation in the field
15:43 Single focusing systems: SLR Magic Cine Rangefinder, Rapido 16A
16:58 Varying de-squeeze issue
17:55 Flares
18:27 Unpredictability issues
18:55 General impressions
20:24 Close focusing advantage with the Anamorphot
20:49 Drawbacks review
21:43 Strengths/advantages review
23:16 Can you use it for professional work?
26:57 Conclusion - wrap up
29:11 What about the Anamorphot 50?
If you want to learn more about anamorphic lenses-- especially those that cost under ten grand, you have to check out Tito Ferradans TH-cam channel, Anamorphic on a Budget.
INDEX:
0:05 Pros and Cons Summary
0:53 Introduction - why anamorphic?
2:22 The best argument for anamorphic
3:25 Why I chose the SLR Magic Anamorphot 40
3:53 The basic specs
6:04 What it's like to use
6:32 Pricing
6:42 Making a set of anamorphic lenses
7:31 Unpredictability with individual lenses
8:26 Comparing to spherical lenses
8:53 Barrel distortion
9:12 Chromatic aberrations
10:07 Contrast
10:19 Bokeh
10:48 Sharpness
13:20 Dual focusing system
14:40 Autofocus
14:47 Focusing tip for Sony users
15:22 Viewing on cameras without anamorphic de-squeeze
15:33 Thoughts on operation in the field
15:43 Single focusing systems: SLR Magic Cine Rangefinder, Rapido 16A
16:58 Varying de-squeeze issue
17:55 Flares
18:27 Unpredictability issues
18:55 General impressions
20:24 Close focusing advantage with the Anamorphot
20:49 Drawbacks review
21:43 Strengths/advantages review
23:16 Can you use it for professional work?
26:57 Conclusion - wrap up
29:11 What about the Anamorphot 50?
มุมมอง: 6 689
วีดีโอ
XVIVE LV2 Budget Micro Lav Review
มุมมอง 5722 ปีที่แล้ว
A deep dive review of the XVIVE LV2, with audio comparisons to the Sennheiser ME2, the Sanken COS11D, and an inexpensive $40 lav. Where does it stand on quality vs form? For a limited time, you can get the LV2 for $72 on Amazon: amzn.to/3E3BFUJ Intro: 0:05 Who is XVIVE: 1:04 Test Setup: 1:43 Vs. the Sennheiser ME2: 1:51 Vs. $40 lav: 3:09 Vs. Sanken COS11D: 3:37 Durability: 4:25 Warranty: 5:08 U...
Ulanzi UuRig Battery Top Handle Grip Review
มุมมอง 8122 ปีที่แล้ว
Cheap power in the palm of your hand finally a battery top handle that gets it right. Mostly. The Ulanzi Uurig R051 in review... better than the Soonwell or Tilta options? We'll see. The Ulanzi is a 9,600 mAh battery top handle-grip for powering devices on your rig, from your camera to your follow-focus to your monitor. Intro: 0:00 Soonwell alternative: 0:33 Ulanzi specs: 1:09 Shortcomings: 2:0...
Weeylite K21 Tube Light Review - Promise Delivered?
มุมมอง 1542 ปีที่แล้ว
Weeylite and its sister company Viltrox have been making the leap into high quality camera gear, and the K21 may just be a fine example of that progress. I look at the features, light quality, and practicality of Weeylite's tube light. They're currently (as of June 2022) on sale in a couple of places. Intro: 0:00 Features: 0:36 App: 1:33 Light Tests: 2:19 Power: 3:12 Scenes: 4:27 Design Flaws: ...
ACON Digital Extract Dialogue Software Review
มุมมอง 1.1K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Designed to remove noisy backgrounds and environment from audio... and priced for working videographers has ACON created a true competitor to Izotope Dialogue Isolate? Is it, dare I use the clique, a killer? Priced at just under a $100, this bit of software can be a life saver, and it's within the price range of your average videographer. Hear it in action and judge for yourself. In order to ke...
Andycine C7 Lite Review
มุมมอง 2752 ปีที่แล้ว
When it comes to field monitors, we don't always need a Portkeys, an Atomos, or a SmallHD. There are plenty of arguments for an inexpensive screen if it's sharp, bright, and easy to use. So how does the Andycine C7 Lite hold up? After three weeks on my rig, I've got the skinny. Want one? Try bhpho.to/3NPnl3D (B&H) Or amzn.to/3amaHuP (Amazon) Jump to where you want to be: Intro: 0:00 Andycine li...
Sony a1 vs Arri vs Red
มุมมอง 13K2 ปีที่แล้ว
How does the Sony a1 compete with cinema cameras like the Arri Alexa Mini LF and the Red Komodo? That's what I wanted to know when I was buying my Sony a1. I discovered that the subtle changes that Sony made to the video side of their flagship made a big difference in bridging that gap, sending it ahead of some established Hollywood cameras and into the competition. This is an in-depth look at ...
My Favorite Light Modifier Fast, Cheap, Easy
มุมมอง 5312 ปีที่แล้ว
Sometimes you want it fast, cheap, and easy just like I like my... coffee. And soft. And controllable. Wait, that's a lot to ask. And many solutions will run upwards of $250 (like the Westcott Ropid Box Switch for $354, or Profoto RFi 4x6 for $599, or the Chimera Daylight Junior for $602). Yikes. One of the modifiers I use the most is 48" in size, costs less than $60, is faster to set-up, light...
Royole RoWrite 2 Review - Animation Simplified
มุมมอง 1.3K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Simple animation? Yes. Quirky, unexpected animations? Yes. One of a kind? You're getting the picture now. It started as a search for a smart notebook, but what I found was a device that could animate text, icons, graphs, symbols, illustrations... As a smart notebook is far superior to the Rocketbook series, and a step above many tablet solutions. You've been seeing examples of the RoWrite in my...
32 bit Float and the Zoom f3
มุมมอง 7K2 ปีที่แล้ว
The Zoom f3 really caught my eye with a great form factor and 32-bit float. But are you really getting the bang you expected for the buck? Will 32 bitrs solve your problem... or is the answer already in your bag? This isn't a review of the f3, it's a look at the misconceptions around 32-bit float and what that means for buyers. The Tascam X8 and other recorders are faced with the same limitatio...
How to back up your files without a computer... for less
มุมมอง 22K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Do you ever dream of backing up your files on the road without a computer or even a power outlet? I did. But the solutions, the Gnarbox and LaCie Boss Rugged were so darn expensive... until I found a $30 solution that not only did that... but kinda did it better: the Anker PowerExpand #shorts #smallbites Want one? Try ebay.to/3JI3H7A www.hurricaneimagesinc.com
Nanlite FS 300 Review-Good Enough?
มุมมอง 16K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Is the budget Nanlite FS300 good enough for professional use? Can it be your "everything light" or does the noise issue make it unusable in the real world? There's a of competition in the 300 realm now Aputure C300D, Godox SL300, just to name two (not to mention Nanlite's own Forza 300. Did Nanlite fall on it's own sword the the quest for the budget crown? Or is the cheapest 300 on the market a...
Best Cardiod Mic for the Money? sE8 Review
มุมมอง 10K2 ปีที่แล้ว
The little-known sE8 has been called "The Best Cheap Mic in the World" with comparisons to the Neumann KM184, but few have heard of it. Here's a review with comparisons to the Oktava MK012 with Michael Joly modification (another champ in the inexpensive mic world one that has been compared to the $2,000 Nuemann KM84). Specs at 1:54 Distance tests at 3:31 Rejection test at 4:20 Comparison to Okt...
Artcise and Davis Sanford Tripod Reviews
มุมมอง 6K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Artcise and Davis Sanford Tripod Reviews
Fotodiox Tilt Shift Adapter Review - Your Next Lens Isn't A Lens
มุมมอง 29K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Fotodiox Tilt Shift Adapter Review - Your Next Lens Isn't A Lens
Sony MDR 7506 Headphones- A Videographer's Review
มุมมอง 6K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Sony MDR 7506 Headphones- A Videographer's Review
Product Sale Announcement - Zhiyun Weebill S... for a Steal
มุมมอง 924 ปีที่แล้ว
Product Sale Announcement - Zhiyun Weebill S... for a Steal
Tilta Mini Matte Box Review - Breaking New Ground
มุมมอง 4.3K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Tilta Mini Matte Box Review - Breaking New Ground
You covered this a while back now but something that came to mind that may be useful. If you have never tried the Bertom Denoiser Pro VST plugin, definitely check it out. It is incredible at removing ambient din type noise, room echo, fans running etc. it's very lightweight in processing and also latency effects. it's an ideal companion to using one of these mics or other sensitive condensers. I've compared the Bertom to things like the Waves NS1 and the Waves AI based noise reducer and it's the least impactful to the sound quality under the worst noise reducing environments. It's also pretty cheap. I use this mic for video conferencing and other voice uses, I run it 5-6" away, typically below my chin and at about 45 deg angle pointed to my mouth to avoid all plosives. It avoids breath plosives and also the proximity coloring being too intense. It is a bit fuller and warmer at that distance.
What recorder that you use for this video sir?
One of the best videos about this adapter. I just ordered mine after doing lots of research about this adapter. Wished I would have found this video early in my research about this product. Would have saved me lots of time bouncing from site to site trying to get as many facts as possible about pros and cons of this adapter vs buying dedicated tilt-shift lenses. Thanks again for a great video explaining the adapters features and limitations.
Thanks-- I hope you like it. It still makes regular appearances in my camera bag.
artcise 601C vs ARTCISE CS80C can anyone tell me the differences apart from price
I have to correct your explanation of the Lensbaby optics. The Edge series, which goes in the Composer tilt "holder", has three optics-35, 50, and 85 mm-that give a slice of focus, not a sweet spot effect. The amount of focus vs. blur changes with the aperture and the degree of tilt, and you can place that slice of focus where you want (not necessarily in the centre). They're even tack sharp all over the image surface when not tilted, unlike the LB optics with the sweet spot effect, which will always have some degree of radial blur. But yes, they don't shift, only tilt.
Hi Sir, I have few Ai lens. What adapter did you use for the Sony ? Which one would you suggest ?
I'm using a Fotodiox and it's been problem free: www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06WVNLVC1/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&th=1
sound is harder than video...I am learning that now😁 if an image is slightly over saturated the audience will forgive...(any Michael Bay Movie)....if the audio is off audience tunes out right away
Hi Sir, can you please make a review on fx3, a9iii and a1 ii
My CFExpress type B cards are $1,000 a piece and I shoot with 2 at a time (redundancy). When I shoot raw at 20 frames per second (45MB x 20 x 2) = 1,800MB per second. To shoot for an entire day, I could easily use four 512GB cards which would mean … $4,000 per day. If on a 10 day trip - card cost is then $40,000. That’s just my primary body without even counting video. Yes, easy to store lots of cards but not very practical. Saving all of my files to multiple external SSD drives each evening is much cheaper. They don’t even need to be high speed … as long as I get multiple copies on multiple drives. I only need cards for one day then. This means taking a laptop unless there is a device that will copy CFExpress type B cards.
I feel your pain. I often used CFExpress Type A cards, and the system doesn't work for this-- though I've never tried hooking my card reader into the system (maybe next trip). This method is slow, but I generally only need to do a field backup a couple times a year.
who are you? How come I never saw your videos? You are like an encyclopedia!!!
I subscribed, you do too, colleague
great video, love your presentation skills
Can’t agree with you more on the cables that should be included with this and similar devices. I burned through $100 on small angled cables to get my rig set up as neat as possible. Sure I was able to return the cables I didn’t need, but the process is a PIA when these companies could include a proper sized and orientated cable with the equipment. It would save allot of time and expense. Even taking into account the enjoyment of rig building, some products should give you a bit of help in this area.
love this review - I'm photographer of 30 years, strobe / studio / location / etc... and newer to videography - after starting off my videography journey, I see how much more technical it is and difficult- thought there are plenty of cross over skills that have been useful. If I could go back and start fresh, I would have placed learning audio, and subsequently what types of mics to use for each situation, way higher on my skill check off sheet. I was using some PicoGear lav mics for over a year and then an MKE600 - which sounded not so good indoors - and then I learned about this style of mic and have been shopping for about 3-months for an affordable mic and this was on my list. The fact that you do this for a living added all the weight I needed to make my decision to give this mic a try - thanks so much for this video, and especially the elongated un-processed access to the audio file - wonderful review.
What a great presentation that reinforces the value of critical thinking when assessing a product! A lot of reviewers should take note! 'SUBSCRIBED'!
Close your eyes and it’s like Nicholas Cage is giving a tripod review. Great info.
That's funny, thanks.
Does it take CFExpress type B cards?
Respectfully, your review is pointless. You did nothing but compare specs that you read online. You, again, respectfully made the same exact mistake that everyone else continues to make, and that is concluding that a certain camera is better simply because of its capabilities. I shot a 3-hour feature film on the Sony fs100 that you wouldn't believe it was shot on that. Lightning, sound, angles, editing, acting, etc. have to be on point. If you wish to see a sample of my work, I can provide it as evidence.
I remember when DSLR's first started to capture video. Vincent Laforet's promo for Canon (technically the second DSLR to capture video, though they wanted us to believe it was the first) was brilliant. The message was, "see what you can do with our new $3,000 camera!" Canon, of course, didn't mention the $40K in lights, stabilizers, actors, and crew that made it watchable. Yes, you can produce amazing results with less capable cameras combined with more capable support... but that doesn't mean you should perform a tooth extraction with a screwdriver and salad tong. Our tools do matter to some extent, and eventually they lead to greater forms of creativity. My video was meant to reframe the discussion somewhat, dissect what separates an "exceptional" cinema camera from simply a capable tool, and hopefully inspire those with similar cameras to post their footage and thoughts. After 120 or so comments on the vid, I'm a little disappointed no one has written-- "yeah, here's my Red up against the Sony," but also pleasantly surprised at the amount of interest in re-thinking what makes a cinema camera today.
Your video saved me money. I’ve been shooting with my a1. It made me not buy the fx9. Your movie. I never need a variable ND. You also put that forward to me. Thank you. This a1 I have. Is the perfect camera. Full frame 8k. Thanks for the thoughtful message in your video. Gear. It’s a bunch of bullshit
Why i hear background noise when i record my music?
For all those fellow flute and woodwind players out there.. if you can not afford a Neumann KM 184, this is the best microphone you can get (provided you use correct positioning). Trust me, I have been there. After buying (and returning some) SM 57/58, Beta 57a, V7, V7x, NT1A, NT1, NT5, Oktava MK012, ... This sounds by far the best on a flute (and probably other woodwinds).
For recording whole orchestra or Quintet, would you go with the omni or cardoid se8?
I was aghast when I saw the 4K 10bit has moiré artefacts, This is still a £4000 camera in the UK. The RX1ii had a variable OLPF around NINE years ago, and yet they're releasing top of the range cameras with no OLPF still. Madness...
I never thought of adding a power bank to my hub, I just thought it didnt work, thanks !
It's worth noting that the SE8's capsule is on the big side for a "small-diameter" mic. This comes with advantages and drawbacks, and it's important to understand both. On the plus side larger capsules tend to have lower self-noise, and that's reflected in the SE8's specs. The only small-diaphragm condensers (SDC) that I know of that bests it in that department is the Sennheiser 8000 series, but those cost 3-4x more. IMO this alone explains the 2 dB noise improvement relative to the Rode NT55. On the plus side larger diaphragm hurts pattern uniformity across frequencies. At high frequencies (8 kHz and above) the diaphragm diameter becomes significant relative to the audio signal's wavelength, and that causes the pattern to "collapse" with reduced off-axis response at high frequencies. The SE8's polar diagrams show that it does so more than smaller-diaphragm SDCs, but less than large-diaphragm mics. It's all a tradeoff. I think that like all SE products the SE8 is a very competently-executed mic, but I don't think that it offers better value than, say, the NT55. It just makes a different tradeoff between on-axis noise and performance and off-axis pattern uniformity. I think that it could be very useful for somebody who only has one cardioid mic, since it's something of a "split the difference" option.
Wow, that sE8 sounds fantastic. While I was planning to get an sE7, I might upgrade straight to sE8.
what is the difference with this and the PONS PT Motorized Pan Head?
This is a double motor unit; the motors are identical. You connect the bottom one normally, and use the bracket to place the top one on its side. The version that you're referring to is simply a single motor version of this.
@@hurricaneimagesmedia thank you for the explanation :)
Does it work with helios 442 lens?
Great review. Thanks.
Thanks for your video! FYI: I exactly NEED the pause function at each way poing (6:40 in your video).
what a beautiful review. thanks for putting the effort into this video! so helpful! :)))
The light no longer has a noise issue. The complaint was heard by Nanlite and corrected with a firmware update.
Nice to know, thanks!
Great channel! The work you put into your videos, and your level of expertise is apparent.
It is so sad that you have no idea what you're talking about since you begin by saying there is no difference between a cine lens and your photo optic. WHEW... go work on your lighting since you look like you're in a cave...
Nothing better than a well-researched product. Thank you
The light no longer has a noise issue. The complaint was heard by Nanlite and corrected with a firmware update.
Thanks, I really appreciated the real world unprocessed sound : thanks. 👍
sir very useful... more comparisons.... lot of info... thank u so much.... live long...
This is the best review ive ever seen. I wish i had teachers like you
Many thanks!
At the end of this video, you mentioned "acquiring" (stealing? LOL) the 50 version, and that you you might do a review of it. I'm debating between the 40 and 50 and so, looked for your review. Didn't find it. Did it happen? If not, care to make any comments about the differences? Thank you. Len
Len! Yeah, this one was so extensive I didn't have the energy to tackle the 50, especially since they're very very similar. The 50 is bulkier, which makes it slightly more cumbersome; and I'm not sure the autofocus (with an autofocus lens) is as snappy. Those are the negatives. On the positive side, it's also a hair sharper-- though I didn't do the extensive testing required to know which lenses it works best with-- and instead of neon blue flare it has a yellow flare that is equally sharp (and slightly green). It's slightly more "natural" than the blue, but only by a little. The 50 is bigger, but it doesn't work with wider lenses than the 40... they both tap out around 40mm. So in the end I can't recommend one over the other. I prefer the 40 for run and gun work, but might choose the 50 for more "planned" shoots. Hope that helps.
Thanks for your very quick reply. Your reply was the answer I needed. Planned shoot? Rarely works out that way. Extra weight? Already carrying too much. Best wishes.
Bravo! Well done. Thank you. Answered a number of my questions, as I'm contemplating purchase.
Many thanks, this is exactly the solution I was looking for as I don't own a laptop!
Excellent video. Thank you.
You didn't just say that Arri and RED only look better because they have specific LUTS did you? Sorry but you are wrong and colorist in Hollywood will tell you that when they have to match A1 vs Arri vs Komodo footage. Colorist don;t just throw a special LUT on their footage and that's they do. That would also mean that you are saying that only RED and Arri are getting the most out of their cameras because of the special LUT. If that was tru Sony would do the same-thing and Sony A1 would look as good as RED and Arri.
Nope, I didn't. If we're talking about the same section, I'm referring to color science, which is how the cameras interpret color and luminous data from their sensors.
@@hurricaneimagesmedia You said that Arri and Red look better because they have a LUT made to match that sensor. If that was the case then Sony would make a custom LUT that made their image look superior. Arri and RED have deep rich color in the mid tones and shadows. When you grade properly this is what you get. If you don't want that look Red and Arri images can be raised without dark shadows and you still get a rich color full image. You are also wrong because colorist usually don't use RED or Arri LUTS because they open up the footage and use scopes and other tools to get the look they want. Most You Tubers don't know how to color grade and know what a proper image should or could look like.
@@contentm3893 Hi content3893, sorry that wasn't what I was trying to communicate (communication in short form is hard). A LUT applies specific color and luminosity values to captured footage; color science applies specific color and luminosity values to data from the sensor-- a step earlier. But they're essentially the same. Sony does have a custom LUT... as do Arri and Red... we simply call it a "color space transform node" in Davinci Resolve. But it operates exactly the same as what people consider a "LUT." Sony also has S Cinetone and other color profiles... or ways of interpreting the color and luminosity data from the sensor. Every pro colorist I know utilizes the color space transform node (usually with their own tweaks later in the chain, plus actual color grading which is entirely different from color correction), and in doing so they apply a "LUT" to footage; you can achieve the same look manually by adjust the contrast, saturation, and pivot points (more or less). Sony cameras look different than Nikon cameras, even when the Nikon model uses a Sony sensor because Nikon uses its own color science. a LUT is different from color science in that it happens after the footage leaves the camera. Why does Arri and Red footage look better? Well, it's debatable that it does. After all, Hollywood blockbusters are shot on the Sony Venice as well, and the cost of the camera in a Hollywood budget is miniscule.
Man let's grade that footage correctly. Check the pipeline and use the Pro Res RAW in another program. Dynamic range data from each camera doesn't tell the whole story. Compare some grade footage. You can only tell what a cameras dynamic range is doing if you compare side by side footage.
how do you open up my iphone's storage app????? I don't see it.
The original control cable that came from Tilta got a short in it, do you know a cable that would work as a replacement anybody?
18:51 I haven't seen it in any of the documentation from Sony, but I see it again here. Sony A1 in Slog3 has dual native ISO - 800 and 4000. If you use Cinetone on the Sony A1 the dual gain ISOs demand a lot more light as they are 125 and 640.
Great video
This is the best review I've ever seen of any product.
Many thanks!
You’re the best reviewer I’ve come across lately… wow, so much knowledge unpacked with such ease and clarity. You will one day have a million subscribers 🙏🏾💯 and well deserved 👏🏾
I love the A1! I'm still learning things about it. I will probably be using this camera for at least another 5 years.