วีดีโอ

You're right. Even though there's no official base iso on the ZV-E1 from Sony's side like it is with the FX3, I totally forgot that they haven't changed this with the ZV-E1 yet. Curious to see if they will. When the FX3 first came out it actually had 640 too (at least that's what we all thought. It's still a little unclear). But thanks for pointing that out! I believe the comparison still holds up, but this should have been mentioned in the video, so I hope people will read your comment. As to why they have it at 800 I assume it has something to do with the FX6 and FX3 being close to identical. Couldn't tell you for sure.

@@kriswarwick Thank you for the quick reply. The only reason I brought it up is because a lot more amateurs have the cheaper ZV-E1.

The sensor is actually ISO 64, only the SLog3 curve makes it 640 or 800, and it's not like that curve is standard.

@@cppguy16 I am very happy you brought it up. Honestly, it's really bad that I didn't get that straight in the video. But thank you!

@@cppguy16 that's true!

You're right. Even though there's no official base iso on the ZV-E1 from Sony's side like it is with the FX3, I totally forgot that they haven't changed this with the ZV-E1 yet. Curious to see if they will. When the FX3 first came out it actually had 640 too (at least that's what we all thought. It's still a little unclear). But thanks for pointing that out! I believe the comparison still holds up, but this should have been mentioned in the video, so I hope people will read your comment.

@ No worries! Weird Sony isn’t crystal clear about things like this since it’s very important information for operating the camera.

Interesting! Thanks! I really appreciate this feedback!

Sometimes the comments that are hardest to hear, are the most important ones. That's why I really appreciate you writing this. Thanks! For me to improve and make better content, I would love to hear more about what you'd like to see more of, and which videos of mine have been good in your eyes. I am still trying to figure out this YT world, and I def. don't want to be "just another TH-camr" as I want to stand out. I want to make more of a difference or at least share things you can't find on any filmmaker/photographer's channel. I made this video because I saw someone on a forum asking for it, but I also see what you mean. I felt good about the intro to this one, and was curious about the reception. I am so grateful for your comment and really hope you will share some of your thoughts with me. Please feel free to reach out to me directly!

​@@kriswarwick Hey man, thanks for taking my comment so positively. The video certainly has its right to exist, but in this day and age nobody (at least not me) wants to see a 15 minute ISO comparison video. I think it could have been made more compact in 2 to 3 minutes? Maybe just make the “boring” topics shorter. Of course I understand that you want to earn money from the advertising revenue through longer videos, but please not at the expense of the viewers :) I found your business videos very interesting and the most authentic. How you made it this far, how you charge, how you invest in equipment and what your view on it is, how you create and grow your business etc Here are my suggestions: Put yourself in the shoes of ambitious beginners who have a passion for videography. - What do you wish you had known back then to make it “easier” for you in business? - What is the best way for a beginner to get their first job? - How should I plan my budget as a beginner? How much should I charge in $ per job? - How much does the photography part influence your business? Should everyone do it? How do you charge for this service and how many images do you provide? - How far can we go in creativity for business videos (color, cut) - Legal aspects of video production: copyright, music licenses and other legal considerations - Would you invest in expensive equipment right from the start, or would you keep pushing it until you could justify investing in new equipment? - How do you optimize the balance between business, creative work and free time? - Strengthening brand identity through videography: How to develop a consistent visual brand identity and communicate it through videos. - Video marketing strategies for businesses: How to use video effectively to increase brand awareness and attract customers - Effective pre-production strategies: planning and preparation for a smooth production process. - Optimizing videos for different platforms: Adapting content for TH-cam, Instagram, TikTok and other platforms - Outdoor lighting techniques when time is short. - How much time to plan per project? - How to deal with clients? Satisfaction, criticism, customer loyalty, etc. - Successful collaboration with brands: Building relationships with big brands like RedBull or Nike (how to communicate) - Current trends in video production: what do companies want to see? - Effective use of voice-overs: choosing the right voice and integrating it into the video - Use of drones for recordings as a one man business - Measuring video success: key figures and analysis tools to evaluate the performance of videos - Crisis management in video production: dealing with unexpected challenges during production. - What to do if you need people in the video? How to get “actors” etc.? These are all topics that I would be happy to listen to for longer than 20 minutes.

@@tobis2265 this is so much more than I could ever ask for. Thank you so much! I appreciate you giving me all this feedback and all the ideas! I will include all of this in my videos in the future, and you opened my eyes in a very good way. Thanks again!

@@kriswarwick I hope to see the videos soon :)

Alle disse kameraene har dual base iso, og det er 800/12800 i s log 3 cine. Se min forrige video om det er uklart ☺️ Det var en lang diskusjon rundt dette da kameraene kom ut, fordi 640 ble nevnt som laveste iso. Men du bør forholde deg til 800, og det er egentlig hele poenget med Cine EI.

Share your cinema secrets hehe 😊

Thanks, Ronald! I am usually trying to use 800, and doing so I don’t get noise. But I tried the Davinci software and the Neat Video. Both worked, but Davinci did something weird to my footage. I like Davinci the best. You can watch the video I made on the switch from Final Cut. Thanks for watching!

YA SHOULD BUY Nikon Z８ Instead of Buying GARBAGE Sony's Flagship Hardly Appropriate for Shooting Video ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️😂😂😂😂

@@Hafiz-p4n In two days I will get the Sony a1, with a 30% discount.

Thank you for watching!

You're right. That's the weight I should have mentioned. The 399 I mentioned is body only, without battery and sd card :)

Oh wow. This is a difficult one and I honestly don't know what I would have done if I wanted it to be perfectly smooth. No matter what you do in the camera you will most likely be able to see that a change has been made. The backlight changing is not as bad as the key light changing, so I would go for a reflector :) I am sorry I don't have a better answer for you!

Thanks for watching!

I have an FJ80 and FJ400. When setting it up you need to choose Olympus as the camera. That works with Leica. I was struggling with this for a while, and honestly just gave up on using the Q3 with a flash. But I've been able to get some really cool ones with the flash, with remote and without.

It's a weird thing. "Bigger is better" to a lot of people. The Leica Q3 is a great example of cameras that are super small, but better than most other cameras.

@@kriswarwick its a point I realize, but if not lumix or canon with manual focus setups or rigs, sony is the clear winner. I have a g9 but in low light-f1.8 and Gl at 3200 are the limit, at 4pm its pitch black and wet here, wont want to carry and ruin lights, so I need a body capable of low light run and gun AF holding. If not a dji pocket or phone for vloggin, best is sonny. Its all about the lens, if you have a peewee lens youll look silly compared to someone with a 70-300mm on any body Pictures are different could care less if the videos suck. Sony seems to have it with the zve1.

@@kriswarwick I dont have a Will or Oil Company Inhertiance for no lieca, hell I cheaped out on the lieca lens for my g9 and went for a zve1. If its garbage with a kit I aint dropping a cent, move up

Honestly, I probably don't have a good answer for you. I would say getting any of these cameras can be hard to justify. But if you look at the total price of a Leica M11 with two lenses, and compare it to the two Q3's, I am not sure if it will be much cheaper. For me, I have fallen in love with the Q3 28, and adding the 43 is just a bonus to my rig.

I can't say I blame you for this. I guess the disappointment didn't get to me as much, as I had the charger from the Q3. Good luck with your camera. I am sure you will love it. And if you find yourself doing street photography at some point you'll love it for that too!

I am pretty sure it's the Sennheiser MZH 600 :)

So this is just second hand information, and other users' experiences. But in short, the compressed files seem to be harder to process. So depending on the capacity of your machine and the software you are using, you might end up with a bigger challenge with those files. It's ironic as the files are smaller, but it might make sense knowing that the files have gone through a "process" to be smaller/compressed. I hope that was clarifying!

@@kriswarwick Oh man, thank you for explaining!

@@AmariRebel of course! Have a good one!

Thank you so much! Really appreciate that!

Dude. This comment made my day. I have been nervous about talking about this, as there are so many videos and explanations on this topic. I'm so happy this helped you! Thanks for being here and welcome to the channel!

Thanks, buddy! It's never about the camera but the operator. Still, the camera can change the operator!

Glad it was helpful! Enjoy the Q3 when the day comes!

This is a tough question as I haven’t used the M-cameras. All I can say is that I am considering switching 100% to Leica, and there’s not a lot of things that won’t be covered by my Q3 and Q3 43. The Q28 will for most of my work be good enough to compete with the lenses you mentioned. Price wise it’s worth mentioning that a lot of the Leica lenses are close to the price of a Q3.

​@@kriswarwickThanks

I see the irony and it’s not lost on me. I feel like I probably shouldn’t have used that word. But again, like I mentioned with text in the video, they can push the prices because we buy them. I think it depends on how you look at the term. Nothing is overpriced if the consumer buys it, but there will always be a discussion about whether it’s worth paying that much more for something. Personally I could never buy these cameras (not even one of them) as an individual. I am able to have it because it’s my company’s. But I really appreciate this comment because it’s very accurate! Thanks!

HAHA! Sure feels like it's that kind of investment. Not sure if I would trade a kidney, but I would trade a lot of other things lol

You might be right there! I see how that is a better fit for a lot of people, and it just depends on the use I guess! Thanks for watching!

@@kriswarwick I am also confident and natural with 3 shot panoramas for a wider shot. As long as the distortion is as good as on this lens, shooting panoramas for a wider shot is no issue

I haven't looked at it like that before, but you're right. The SL3 body is the price of a full Q3, so it actually isn't too bad. Still expensive haha

Yeah… that part is unfortunate

I agree with you 100%. I am considering getting the SL3 in addition to the Q3 + Q3 43. What do you think?

@@kriswarwick I have an SL3. I' not a pro but as an amateur (for the love of it!), I've both studio and other photography that worked better with a system camera. I have a mix of Leica and Sigma glass that satisfy multiple needs. I really like the camera and recommend it enough, so long as you're okay with the weight, size, and dimensions. I used to shoot a Nikon D810, and though the overall designs make them feel very different handheld, the SL3 has some terrific ergonomics for my hands. The images are without question superb and with the Q3 and 43, I can cover everything that tickles me to shoot.

This reply might have been an expensive one for me lol Thanks!

@@kriswarwick 😇

I am looking at the Leica SL3 just about every day now. It's a big investment, but I already put my SOny A7RV out for sale. So maybe your suggestion is closer to reality than you thought!

Aha! That’s insightful! Thanks. Could not figure that one out

That makes a lot of sense!

I’ve been waiting for you! Thank you so much! Really happy you’re here!

​@@kriswarwick The pleasure is mine

Thanks for being here! I recommend the 28!

regardless of how much I love this camera, I agree with you. For me, running a business it feels more justified but I also know that I could get the same jobs without it.

Thank you! I am in love with Leica myself now. That would be fun! As in just attaching my gopro to the top of it and shoot that way, for instance?

I am so sorry. I have kinda coined my own terms for filmmaking lol. Slow shutter speed that is. Thanks for asking so I could clarify!

@ no worries. Thank you for your reply.

Oh wow. I was considering the Q2M before the Q3 was released. What do you love the most about it?

@ it makes me think twice before I make a photo. The conditions need to be on par (shadow and light is even more important) and the composition matters even more (to me). It’s sharper than the color version too (lack of the bayer filter) and you can shoot in the dark at high iso without compromising IQ. I’ve been watching tons of videos and read a lot about the Q2M before buying one. I love this camera.

It does, doesn't it... Have to look into this.

Maybe you have to see if something is wrong with the screen you’re using? Good luck with Game of Thrones then 😅

Thanks for watching! And thanks for commenting! I will look into this and get back to you. I usually never shoot with more than 125 for my portraits, but I am also curious to see how it performs with the 1/2000 as I do that for sports

I will see if I can make a short on this!