วีดีโอ

Great question! We plan on covering this in a future video but for now we use kits like this www.amazon.com/dp/B08ZDH3TPR?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&ref_=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_W0RTMGAR4Z1TBNFGJ3KB&skipTwisterOG=1

Yes! Its just a sticker

They really redeemed themselves with this one!

Thank you!

3-ish weeks. However, we repped with this head multiple times a week, and when we didn't rep I was doing individual reps with it daily. Really beat the crap out of it

Grey* but green would be cool too

Wow talk about a throwback! Might have to make an updated version of it!

Very cool! Most 2F guys are going to love using the Logik!

@@jacobstover1669 really is a small world! I’ll let him know you said what’s up!

@@MaverikFilms indubitably

@MaverikFilms thanks for not making a lock v2...

@@ajax01-n6o POMAAAAAAAA

@@kythegoalie it’s a nice touch! Wish they came with all Logik orders!

ngl i hated the weapon x im a ceo 3 person bc its the stiffness of a x-it but the flex of a ceo

@ryanmaly625 you thinking about trying the Weapon X 2.0?

@Gklplus probably not strictly because I'm only a pinch foso, and I go to college next year. If they need me to take a faceoff there I'll think about investing in a WX2 but untill then I'll stick with what I have

@ gotcha! College lax is a blast you’re going to love it, keep us updated on how it goes once you get there!

@Gklplus appreciate it man! You guys keep posting and making great content!

3f🗣️🔥

@@lcarax28 I do love when companies release faceoff heads, but I can’t imagine SK having a reason to release a new version of the 2F. I can’t think of any improvement needed to the existing 2F that would require SK to come out with a “more improved” version

As the former director of partnerships at stringking, it’s not lol

@ I have the cad files tho

How soft is it compared to the 2F

@@Laxreviewsid say its softer than og wx but stiffer than 2f so like in between the 2f and og wx

@@Laxreviews perfect medium between 2f and 2f stiff, plus the added structure of the weapon x bottom rail

@@saigonthug4480 Described it perfectly

@@Jelqmaxxer678 It’s unbelievably better than the og, huge fan of the WX2.0!

@@gusc1617 waiting on one more head to be released, then we’ll 1000% make this video!

@@Gklplusgait FO?

Good review, definitely curious on that stiffer rail used with a rake. Keep up the great work fellas

@@kochlax you’re the man!!

​@@Gklplus who is left to release a head?

@@maisie106sr We ended up using the pattern on the STX website, it was something we’ve never done but wasn’t too difficult once we got the hang of it!

@@rogueryno2274 Nope, regular 2F

@@lcarax28 In our opinion, this is more flexible than the WX2. Majority of the reason being the type of flex that the Formula’s left sidewall has. The left sidewall kinking hard, along with the softer plastic being used, the Formula most likely will feel more flexible than the WX2. Wish I could give you a more confident answer, but its a tough comparison to make when the left sidewall of the formula is very different than the WX2’s left sidewall.

@@MonkeyGaming2020 Is it the original Weapon X or the Weapon X 2.0?

@@michaelcornacchia5964 This is a fantastic question, a potential video within itself! The horizontal sidewall strut in the proton power has a very unique feel to it, and to be completely honest I have yet to faceoff with any of the current head options that feels similar to the proton power. However, these 4 heads might be worth trying: OG Duel, Duel 2, X-IT. I recall most guys who used the proton/super power for faceoffs switching to the Duel line, and then eventually switching to the Mark 2F. Any STX head, except or the duel 3/duel reflex, would feel somewhat similar to the proton power. Hope this helps!

@@panthersblow Couldn’t agree with you more. This is exactly how we feel about the Burn Recovery, almost like it’s a clamp-specific head. Feels really good if you can get them on the whistle and does well at slipping under plastic in some situations, but just like you said the 2F will really expose its weaknesses. The 2F is just so dang good in all aspects of the faceoff, it’s really hard to NOT use it!

@@billyconway7662 The more the better, nothing is worse than cutting a piece of crosslace, stringing the head, and then towards the end the string is too short. I will cut a piece that is as long as the distance from my finger tips to my armpit. This gives me plenty of string to use, might be too much for some guys. I have shorter arms and it’s enough string for me.

@@kochlax Great point, next time we’ll have to use super contrasting colors to help show the knots better. Thank you for the feedback!!

@Gklplus nothing but love for you guys! But you already knew that..

@@Phantom-___- Depends on a couple of things, what are you currently using?

@@Laxandfishing Ehh maybe, there’s one less sidewall hole on the 2.0 at the bottom (where I had to do that quadruple knot) so depending on how you strung your OG it might work in the 2.0 or you might have to do something crazy like I did!

@@trevortrevor2413 there’s 1 less sidewall hole on the 2.0 down at the bottom of the sidewall, which explains the “intricate” knot. Depending on the pattern you used for your og it might work for the 2.0, but worst case scenario you might have to play around with it towards the bottom of the head.

@@Parley-o2p Thank you!!

@@lp_6014 Great question! The ball 1000% sits deeper in the throat, which was what we were going for with this pattern. There’s nothing more frustrating than when a pocket is too shallow in the throat and makes it a struggle for us faceoff guys to comfortably cover the ball. The bottom lace technically is “less important” but I have mine pulled relatively tight so prevent the ball from sitting too low. With the ECD Hero 4.0 the pocket has more structure than expected and seems to reduce the potential of the pocket bagging super low.

@@lp_6014 It’s worth trying out!

@@Mikeyhaas08 Had to improvise! The one less sidewall hole on the 2.0 stresses me out so I had to come up with something that would work!

Went before the whistle

@@Mikeyhaas08 😂😂😂

@@Phantom-___- Great question! For shafts, we really enjoy the Savage X Titanium 7. It’s unbelievably affordable and is very nice quality. Tough to beat its price! For heads, it all depends on the player. Right now, we recommend the StringKing Mark 2F simply because its been the most popular head for years. It’s being used by almost everyone for a reason, not to say that these newer heads wont eventually replace the 2F, but until that happens the 2F is what we recommend for most players.

@@big1543 love it! Don’t notice much of a difference in the performance of the head. We think dying faceoff heads adds some creative seasoning to the position haha

@@He3sh5 We would say its smack dab in the middle. Where if you were to take a face flexing head like a CEO, but NOT make it face flex and made it a traditional flex this is very similar. Face flex is a very unique and “extreme” feel, so don’t expect to get that same feeling out of this head. It doesn’t feel like a super true traditional flex, nor a true face flex. It’s literally right in the middle.

@@trevortrevor2413 Fantastic question! Most would agree that the Mark 2F is the end goal. It’s the most used head on the market for a reason. For someone who’s just now starting to learn s who doesn’t have any habits or mechanics fully developed yet, I would say it’s worth a shot trying. The “growing pains” that most guys experience with the 2F who’ve never used one before, are because they are coming from a head that doesn’t flex like a 2F (Burn FO, CEO, etc.) so yes they will naturally struggle with getting used to it. In your situation, I would definitely recommend trying one out. Give it lots of time, make sure it breaks in, and make sure you understand the feel of the head.

@@Gklplus I am not completely new to faceoffs, I got a weapon x after freshman year because I was on jv, and I played every single position except attack and goalie. I thought it would be good as I mostly played middie and defense a if I was to take a faceoff it would be good for everything. Recently I started getting together with my team's faceoff guy, and I don't think the og weapon x is as great now that I am actually learning techniques and speed. He uses the mark 2f. I would probably take faceoffs with a pole, and I need something that I can really do everything. And based off your review of the 2f, I have been leaning towards that.

@ Gotcha, yea the 2F would be a great option for your situation!

@@alexpostelfogo Absolutely! We have lots of matchup videos coming up soon!

@@Phantom-___- Depends on the player. If you want a softer version of a 2F then you might like it. Feels like a Duel 2 and a 2F combines. The softness of the X-IT seemed to cause the head to struggle in 50/50’s because it would collapse in on itself, and the softness also causes the durability to suffer tremendously. It feels good to use but most people enjoy how the 2F is good in almost every category, the X-IT doesn’t do as well across the board.

@Gklplus thank you. I was thinking about getting the weapon x 2 I'm coming from a burn fo recovery do you think that's a good option

@ We mentioned this in the video, but if you are looking to get into a more traditionally flexing head, the Weapon X 2 is a great option. The 2F is difficult to get used to for some players who come from the Burn FO’s and the CEO’s. The Weapon X 2 is much easier to work with, especially the white one. The natty feels incredibly soft but for some reason it wouldn’t wrap around the ball ask well as the white one. We plan on making a video about the different color options for the WX2 and who would use which one so stay tuned for that!

@@lp_6014 of course!

@@Musicmelo14 are you referring to the OG Weapon X? If so, that’s agreeable. All heads get better with time, but I would rather use the WX2

@ yes I am

@ that’s fair it is better than the original. I just don’t think that the original deserves the heat it gets from the lacrosse community

@@Musicmelo14 the bar is just so high with faceoff heads ever since the 2F was released that any head not on its level is considered bad. It’s unfortunate but it is what it is. Love ECD and they definitely made massive improvements with the 2nd Weapon X. Easily one of our top 3 heads of all time.

@@Gklplus fair it is a high bar to break with the mark 2f thanks for the feedback and I would buy a wpx2 but it costs too much for me lol