วีดีโอ

Bei mir das gleiche Problem. Konnte es anfangs noch auf Garantie reparieren lassen. Aber leider ist der gleiche Fehler wieder aufgetreten.

Yes you are correct even though some non-B uses the socket 478 which did have sata as well. They used a few different main boards on theses depending on year. Even with same model.

The Revox reel to reel are built to be serviced so much easier and quite easy to get to boards and do adjustments as needed, just like the more professional studer reel to reel decks. My all favorite are the Revox decks.

Kind of have to make compromises when designing something this compact.

@@johnlockesghost5592During this era, Japan prioritized the use of plastic & spaghetti circuitry over modularity & reliability

The motherboard bios is custom to work with the oscilloscope board, same as the drivers. People have successfully managed to upgrade board but was straight forward and highest OS that would work was XP, with custom drivers. I ended up selling the oscilloscope and going with a Rigol dho4804 which is better preforming as far as noise and overall performance, as deal with switch mode supplies and restoring audio gear and needed something to replace my analog and digital oscilloscope for more bench space and does the job great.

Yes you’re right, I really do need to get a custom small desk tripod or swing arm. As hard to hold camera while repairing stuff.

It is correct as I didn’t use a 50 ohm terminator, so will read double which would be 4v instead of 2v peak to peak.

@@thetechgenie7374 what does a 50ohm terminator do?

@@akashv5622 it is pretty much a resistor that in the BNC terminator adapter that matches the impedance of the signal generator output which is 50 ohms.

@@thetechgenie7374 do probes usually come with these terminators?

Yep I always stated whoever designs half these cars sure be forced to work on them as punishment. A BMW master technician and wonder what the engineers designing the car were thinking? The worst was VW I hated those as usually required engine removal, then don’t get me started with cam wear and bad main rear seals on low mileage of those. Now the Nissan are not as bad as some state. They actually pretty reliable if you change the CVT transmission fluid with the OEM Nissan fluid and filter every 30k. Yes the belt wear in and leave excessive shavings if not change every 30k and seen a few that grenade itself. As the metal spacers pops out and metal belt fall to pieces destroying and even putting a hole in the transmission housing. I rebuilt a few over the years. If you do required 30k maintenance they can last over 285k miles. I know someone still have the original CVT transmission and still going strong. The Nissan actually nice on the road and pretty comfortable ride. I going to use the Nissan as my daily especially during winter months and keep the BMW as a weekend driver.

@@thetechgenie7374 Yeah I agree 100% with all of that. My only problem with my 2014 Murano CVT is it doesn't like the cold. It likes to have a high rev, not shifting belt movement, until it warms up, then it works normally. Any ideas on that problem?

@keithnoneya Typically a sticking solenoid in valve body, or TCM failing, could be also bad connection as well.

@@thetechgenie7374 I was thinking maybe the tolerances were to tight on the pulley that moves inside on those pins. Possibly a programming issue, if it's designed to compensate for temperature. I know the Ford 4R100 has that issue, and they put in a bypass valve just for that. Anyways thanks for the reply bud. Hey any chance you have a Tek 24XX series calibration with the TM plug in series modules?

⁠@@keithnoneyaThey do have to be programmed using dealer software and bidirectional scanner, but typically they also have adaptive learning mode as well for the first 150 miles to 1k miles after programmed or initialize after fluid changed. Typically when it comes to not shifting correctly or at all unless high idle and when cold but completely normal when warm is leaning towards a valve body issue due to lack of pressure some where, typically a stuck solenoid maybe not opening or closing correctly as fluid gets thicker when cold and flow less smoothly.

Was going to go with the cheaper 900 series but I do play with RF and work on transceivers and switch mode supplies and good noise performance and having separate 50 ohm amplifier path instead of just an internal resistor is nice. Plus the extra bandwidth is a plus. Also need active and differential probes, so when with this model as only series that you can buy and use those probes with. Plus was looking to replace need to have an analog scope for audio equipment I work on and this one definitely gets the job done. Been playing around with it and definitely preform way better then early DSO’s didn’t like and see even distortion that my analog scope doesn’t. I am impressive with it so far. Definitely a good replacement for those of us that are old school and hate aliasing and need scope to trigger on complex signals. This one does it with ease. Plus doing complex math is great as this scope faster then what I used back in the day with early DSO’s. Yes expensive but was worth the price. Most I just recommend the 800, or 900 series as more then enough for most and still 12 bit.

​@@thetechgenie7374 hi mate I know your yeasion bike is similar to my yolin dual motor bike can you do me a video about connecting the controllers together I had issues now the bike is all over the place with connecting everything back together where the throttle not working and alarm signals lights are not working. The brake light is constantly on also

I kinda of hated these HP scopes as unfortunately uses one for years and yes everything you stated is completely true unfortunately, plus very limited memory. Now good thing about them is they have a build calibrator instead of having to rely on an expensive Fluke automatic external calibrator like the Tektronix oscilloscope from this era. Plus pretty easy to get parts for as way to many still around so can find hybrids and etc pretty easily. Of course I just bought the whole scope for spare parts as much cheaper then buying parts off crazy eBay sellers that ask ridiculous prices that no one really pays and stay listed for years hoping they will find a sucker. Yes as much hate I have for this series of DPO oscilloscope I bought a couple 1.5 GHz 4 channels version of it. One being low hours in mint condition and other for spares. It going to replace my 1 GHz 784C I loved but retiring as want only one DPO on the bench not two as have limited bench space and reason using only the 350 MHz only currently. Yes could buy a new Rigol or Siglent DSO and call it a day and would be cheaper as can get a decent MSO version for cheaper around 1k but do like one with at least 1 GHz bandwidth and those cost 10k plus for a decent one like the Rigol MSO8000 and the logic analyzers in those cheaper 350 MHz MSO’s like the HP MSOX3000 series that I had but ASIC failed repaired it then a year later FPGA failed and sold it for parts as paid 1.5k last time for a broken spare board to take BGA ASIC off of to repair it as can’t buy separate parts for it and when it was working found it to be way to limited and I work on older stuff with CPU’s had external buses like arcade board and ETC and one piece of gear that HP made that I absolutely love is hp logic analyzer 1670 series one thing HP did manage to get right, I wish they made their oscilloscopes that good. So being had bad luck with HP oscilloscopes in general you can understand why I don’t really care for them. I usually only like Lecroy or Tektronix oscilloscopes. For everyone one else working on FPGA’s and arduino and etc a newer MSO like the Rigol MSO5000 Series will be better in measurement and deep memory then these older DPO’s back in the day. Me I just prefer the older equipment as work on vintage arcade boards and RF and analog electronics.

@@thetechgenie7374 I used one of the 1.5Ghz 4ch one of these in grad school. They're also super big and heavy too! My personal scope was a 54645D, basically a MSO before they called them MSOs, and now in the last few years, I've acquired a couple MSOX2000 series - a 2ch and a 4ch. Both have been 'upgraded' to the max capabilities of the hardware. That sucks that you had a 3000 series blow an asic AND a FPGA - sounds like a voltage rail was out of spec and running too high. Generally the 2000 and 3000 series seem to be pretty bulletproof, with the exception of the nvram corruption firmware bug (which is good, because that's how you can get them cheap). I'd like to track down a 4 ch 3000 series. I have a 16900 series logic analyzer (the bigger and one generation newer cousin of the 1670) - they kindof screwed the pooch on that one too - the logic analyzer cards have these plastic runners on the back of the board that the glue goes corrosive over time, and eats traces and vias off the boards. They're a real b17ch to fix, but worth it in the end. 100% of the cards, both the 16700 series and 16900 series cards are failing at this point in time because the traces on the boards are damaged. There's only 3 states the cards can be in - failed, on the verge of failing, or someone has spent hours under a microscope fixing them. The 16900 mainframe can be upgraded with a modern motherboard and run windows7 though, making the logic analyzer software much faster, and providing usb2, gig ethernet, and modern monitor support. If that same upgrade could be done to these older series infinium scopes, they'd be a lot more desirable.