northstar1950
northstar1950
  • 35
  • 96 691
15 March 2024
A quick look at a British folding camera.
มุมมอง: 647

วีดีโอ

A look at two Nikon F cameras from the early 70s
มุมมอง 7119 หลายเดือนก่อน
A look at two Nikon F cameras from the 70s
A tale of two Summitars
มุมมอง 395ปีที่แล้ว
A tale of two Summitars
A look at a Leitz Summicron F2 collapsible lens.
มุมมอง 2.1Kปีที่แล้ว
A look at an early Summicron F2 collapsible lens.
A look at the Leitz Summitar.
มุมมอง 2.7Kปีที่แล้ว
A viewing and chat about the second Leitz F2 lens to be produced, namely the Summitar.
The Leitz Summar
มุมมอง 2.8Kปีที่แล้ว
A quick look at the Leitz Summar F2 lens. ,
A closer look at a few 5cm Leitz Elmar lenses
มุมมอง 1.7K2 ปีที่แล้ว
More ramblings regarding things Leica. The Leitz Elmar lenses. 350,000 5cm lenses were produced!
Introducing the Leica III
มุมมอง 8822 ปีที่แล้ว
Introducing the Leica III
A Leica I once owned turned out to have something of a history!
มุมมอง 1.2K2 ปีที่แล้ว
A Leica I once owned turned out to have something of a history!
My Ramble about Leica Cases.
มุมมอง 6662 ปีที่แล้ว
My Ramble about Leica Cases.
A Leica II joins the collection, more Leica rambling.
มุมมอง 3.3K2 ปีที่แล้ว
A Leica II joins the collection, more Leica rambling.
Further thoughts about things Leica.
มุมมอง 5472 ปีที่แล้ว
I managed to accidently alter the orientation when I placed the negative against the card for the second time, the 'image leak' between the sprocket holes should be at the top with the film image upside down as it would be in the camera.
More Leica waffle, is the film sitting to low?
มุมมอง 6613 ปีที่แล้ว
More Leica waffle, is the film sitting to low?
Updates on the Leica Collection.
มุมมอง 9783 ปีที่แล้ว
Updates on the Leica Collection.
Talking about my Asahi Takumar lenses.
มุมมอง 2583 ปีที่แล้ว
Another look at some M42 lenses. This time Takumars from Asahi Optical..
Vintage Glass on digital cameras........M 42 fit lenses and a bit of controversy?
มุมมอง 2633 ปีที่แล้ว
Vintage Glass on digital cameras........M 42 fit lenses and a bit of controversy?
Using my vintage lenses on my digital cameras.
มุมมอง 5583 ปีที่แล้ว
Using my vintage lenses on my digital cameras.
Leitz Summitar and why it got a partial strip down!
มุมมอง 5K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Leitz Summitar and why it got a partial strip down!
Things to check when buying a screw thread Leica
มุมมอง 4K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Things to check when buying a screw thread Leica
Leica updates, Summar lens, Voightlander meter
มุมมอง 1.5K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Leica updates, Summar lens, Voightlander meter
An early Leica IIIc compared to a later one
มุมมอง 3.6K4 ปีที่แล้ว
An early Leica IIIc compared to a later one
Using a screw thread Leica
มุมมอง 10K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Using a screw thread Leica
Pentax Comparisons, a look at the Spotmatic 1 and the Spotmatic 2
มุมมอง 2.8K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Pentax Comparisons, a look at the Spotmatic 1 and the Spotmatic 2
Leica Comparisons The British Reid III and the Leica IIIb
มุมมอง 3.9K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Leica Comparisons The British Reid III and the Leica IIIb
Leica Comparisons, Including a IIIf , M3 and a IIIg
มุมมอง 12K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Leica Comparisons, Including a IIIf , M3 and a IIIg
Leica Comparisons. A Leica M3 compared with a IIIF
มุมมอง 3.4K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Leica Comparisons. A Leica M3 compared with a IIIF
Leica Comparisons IIIc compared with the IIIf
มุมมอง 11K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Leica Comparisons IIIc compared with the IIIf
Leica Comparisons, comparing the Leica IIIb with the IIIc
มุมมอง 3.7K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Leica Comparisons, comparing the Leica IIIb with the IIIc
Leica comparisons, comparing a Leica IIIa with a Leica IIIb
มุมมอง 3.9K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Leica comparisons, comparing a Leica IIIa with a Leica IIIb
My Film camera collection No1 Leica IIIA
มุมมอง 3.5K4 ปีที่แล้ว
My Film camera collection No1 Leica IIIA

ความคิดเห็น

  • @photographyforenjoyment
    @photographyforenjoyment หลายเดือนก่อน

    It would actually accept 120 or 620 film. The difference was in the size of the centre hole in the film spool, hence the 2-stage 'cog' inside the film chamber. 620 film was discontinued back in the 1960s.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@photographyforenjoyment hello there, since this vlog I have put a film through it with slightly mixed results, probably down to me!

  • @TXGRunner
    @TXGRunner หลายเดือนก่อน

    I liked the colors on the bathing huts.

  • @koby1960
    @koby1960 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just got a Pentax Spotmatic F with the SuperTakumar 55 1.8 it was sold very cheaply as it had the mirror staying in the up position...a drop of light sewing machine oil fixed that.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hope you enjoy using it😊

    • @koby1960
      @koby1960 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@northstar1950 Yes just about to finish the first test film to check for light leaks etc

  • @user-zg4cz7hr6c
    @user-zg4cz7hr6c 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's really easy to clean one of these lenses inside - the elements unscrew and so you can easily get into it. DON't though try to disassemble the aperture blades as even Leica repair experts warn that there are VERY difficult to put back. If your lens needs cleaning inside then it's no problem to unscrew the various elements and you don't need any special tools!

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The blades had to be removed as they were rusty. I think it's safe to say any good lens technician will be able to do it. Alan Starkie re assembled mine and probably did a full clean. This lens was externally cosmetically better than the one bought to replace it, so I was prepared to invest money into it. From memory there are two lens surfaces that can be cleaned with the front groups removed. I'm quite pleased that I've been able to save a lens that was described as '"scrap' by one London Leica dealer. My wifes careful cleaning of the iris blades worked beautifully too. The front surface of the lens behind the Iris was covered with a thin layer of iron oxide from the leaves. It appeared the lens had been badly stored in a damp or humid location. Paul, there is another vlog I did about why it was partially stripped and explains things in more detail. Thanks for your comments.

  • @scrptwic
    @scrptwic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I recently reconditioned my Spotamatic SP11 it needed new light Seals and a mirror bumper the camera came with a few Takumar lenses the 50mm1.4 radioactive lens, 35mm 3.5 and a 135mm 3.5 the lenses all had the original metal lens hoods

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Since I did this upload I bought an inexpensive Geiger Counter and found both of my Takumar SMC 55mm F1. 8 lenses are both radioactive.

  • @TXGRunner
    @TXGRunner 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was a fascinating story. I just heard back from Leica on where some of my cameras were shipped, and my mind is swimming with the possibilities of what images were taken once they were sold on the eve of war in Shanghai, Vienna, and Munich.

  • @winniebucur655
    @winniebucur655 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    in connection with " a look at the Leitz Summitar " dear sir , I hope you'll read my brief comment 1- all lenses were designed by Dr. Max Berek ; the Summitar design was further developed by Dr Walther Mandler to eventually become the Summicron V1. 2. as for the coatings of Summitar and Elmar the story gets a 90 degre turn ; it happened like so ; in early '46 an American colonel ,two revolvers dangling at his waist , cowboy boots an' all thought best to show his importance by kicking Herr Leitz'a study door and simultaneously barking God knows what ; the only words that Herr Leitz understood was that the colonel wanted the blueprints of Leica ; he opened the door of his safe and handed them over ; the colonel still barking left ; not long after he came back in a total rage , again barking that Herr Leitz gave him the wrong plans ; no Herr Colonel , answers Herr Leitz , I gave you the right plans , but I cannot give you the love , the experience ,. the know how and the loyalty of my workers ; I am sorry your people could not manufacture a Leica ; the colonel left in utter silence ; Herr Leitz very soon realized that by loosing the war all German patents will go to the victors ; Dr Berek was working on a different kind of coating as opposed to Carl Zeiss , specially formulated for soft glass ; the coating -only one layer- proved to be not particularly good ; in them times people were mesmerized by coated lenses , alas , only Zeiss ; Herr Leitz's decision brought in some welcome money and comparatively few lost their jobs ; the blades for the iris were made from a special alloy and heat treatment which was in short supply ; nice photograph that with the horses ; as for colour reproduction , tested on my Leica digital an untreated Leica lens gives better colours ; you mentioned something that reduces vignette (ing) ; it is a French word and it is pronounced vinEEeht ; all the story with the colonel is written down in Herrn Leitz correspondence with my grandfather; nice and passionate vlog , I've just subscribed ; bestest from an old painter and Mediaeval Art historian P.S. there are circumstances , albeit rare when a Summitar beats a Summicron ...

  • @jeremykeller211
    @jeremykeller211 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you supply serial numbers for these? I have the 1950s iiic and I would like to zero in on its year of production.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you Google 'Leica camera serial numbers' you can find the year any Leica camera was manufactured.

  • @filibertkraxner305
    @filibertkraxner305 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really interesting and detailed video: thanks for making the effort! Quite a few differences in operation, compared to later M Leicas. While the mechanics are beautiful, I think I'll stick with the simpler operation of an M6. Easier to work with.

  • @sauravbasu8805
    @sauravbasu8805 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do you keep your cameras and lenses in such squeaky clean state ? Bravo !

  • @sauravbasu8805
    @sauravbasu8805 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Some sample photos would have been added

  • @andrewcomerford9411
    @andrewcomerford9411 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Z= Zeit (time).

  • @paultaylorphotography9499
    @paultaylorphotography9499 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome info thanks for this video. I picked up a canon L3 body only my old Zorki and industar has gone awol 😡 so I needed a quick Ltm lens just picked one off fb marketplace Elmar 5cm 3.5 not a fake 😂 but it has dust and a bit of haze so I’m not expecting stellar results but at 200 nzd I don’t think it’s a bad price and it’s pretty local so can’t wait to get it and shoot it. Thanks again great vid

  • @cliftonwhittaker260
    @cliftonwhittaker260 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was the first camera I ever bought. I got mine from a pawnshop in early 1961. I thought it was cool the way the bellows extended when the front was opened. The shutter stopped working and I took it back and traded it for another rangefinder model.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment.

  • @spajdude
    @spajdude 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Greetings from Sweden! I had an Ensign Selfix 820 6x9 with the Xpres lens for a while. Very sturdy camera and I loved the built-in hinged mask flaps for 6x6. I think the Rosstar on your camera is a triplet. The red dot on the focus scale is the hyperfocal distance. You set it, and then the aperture to the red dot on the aperture scale, and you will have acceptable sharpness from about 10 feet to infinity. Set the shutter speed to the correct one for using f:11 and you have a snapshot camera. But these days the hyperfocal feature is seldom used, since we like to take our time to set the correct distance and other settings for each shot.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks, good tip, oddly enough I have been trying to get my head around hyperfocal distance as opposed to DOF.

  • @leonarddaneman810
    @leonarddaneman810 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a very similar camera, a Robra made in Germany by one of the Rodenstock's. It has a Rodenstock lens. You are quite right that the format is that of the professional 645's, but with the folding bellows fits in your pocket! When my Pentax 645z is a behemoth but uses a sensor barely the size of a true 645, one wonders how far we've come? The distinction held by the Robra is that a fledgling Japanese company, Zuiko, copied the camera down to the last screw to produce their first Olympus camera! I own two Olympus 4:3rds digital cameras, and to have the Robra puts the technology into perspective. Perhaps in a photo walk I will take some photos with the Robra-Rodenstock along with the Olympus OM-E series 20mgpxl and compare.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interesting comment and thanks. I still find it amazing that a camera as compact can take roll film.

  • @theoldunsshot1005
    @theoldunsshot1005 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have one which is the model 1 from 1950. It is almost identical except it has no accessory shoe and the grip material is a finer grain texture. On mine it is the Ensar 75mm f4.5 lens. I have shot one roll of Fomapan 200 through it and the results look good, but I have put it aside until I obtain a proper 120 scanner. The only servicing I've had to do is glue the red film counter window back in place (a common fault, I believe). I think yours may be a model IV, but I'm no expert. Keith

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks Keith. If I put a film through I will send it away for developing and scan it at home. Despite having a suitable tank I've never managed to develop a roll film.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think you right about mine being a mark IV Keith, I have clearly got things wrong. I was under the impression that the version with the folding viewfinder was a later version but that doesn't appear to be the case. Does yours have the finger pricking spike that reminds you to cock the shutter?

    • @theoldunsshot1005
      @theoldunsshot1005 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@northstar1950 The finger prick came later than my version, so no blood with mine!

  • @gregoryowain2073
    @gregoryowain2073 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good to know!

  • @gregoryowain2073
    @gregoryowain2073 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you find there is much difference in the user experience between the two cameras for the viewfinder/rangefinder? Are they about the same brightness? Is the iiib any faster?

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The difference isn't that great, I don't find the different spacing between the viewfinder and rangefinder to be big advantage regarding use. I suppose you could argue the latter design is more aesthetically pleasing but even that is arguable. The improved placing of the diopter adjuster is an improvement for those that would use it.

  • @user-do5hd7zb4x
    @user-do5hd7zb4x 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I sympathize I lost my dads nikon and later a similar nikon. Hope your able to locate anther in better shape. I had no idea there were Kugel editions in existance. VERY GENEROUS OF YOU TO SHARE THIS, THANK YOU. I THINK I HELD A LEICA 3G OR LEICA 2 MADE IN 1937 A FEW YEARS AGO. I SHOULD HAVE BOUGHT IT I THINK. IT HAD THE PORT HOLE WITH THE FILM COUNT ON UPER OR LOWER CORNER. IT WAS A SORT OF POWDER BLUE. I CANT REMEMBER IF IT WAS KNOB WIND OR LEVER WIND. I THINK IT HAD RETANGULAR WINDOWS BUT IF IT WASLEVER WIND I DONT REMEMBER. MAYBE ITS GOOD I DIDNT BUY IT BECAUSE IT MAY HAVE BEEN DOUBLE STROKE LEVER AND I DONT THINK I COULD EASILY GET USED TO THAT. THANKS VERY MUCH . BYE

  • @andychandler3992
    @andychandler3992 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you have any idea why they added Germany under the later model? I have a iiia iiib and now a iiic and the prewar an and b don’t have Germany engraved under Wetzlar.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm sorry I don't know the answer to that.

  • @stefan_becker
    @stefan_becker 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting, but I'm missing sample pictures as well as sharpness and bokeh test.

  • @stevebarnett5048
    @stevebarnett5048 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A serial starting with a 72 would most likely make it a 1971 camera, and Nikon finished making F's in 1973. The first cameras from 1959 to 1963 had a serial starting with 64, after 1964 the first two numbers more or less coincided with the build year. So for example your black body was built in a batch that covers June 1971 to January 1972. During 1972 the so called 'Apollo' changes were made with a plastic tip on the film advance lever.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for clearing that.

  • @alexcarrillo5510
    @alexcarrillo5510 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ok Let me tell you in How to fix the shutter without spending $$$ on the shutter repair, When I got my 2nd Nikon that I notice that I was seeing a small white cloud on top right side of the photo, So I used a Agfa Lupe to see in what is the problem, and there was seen a Small slit hole just like your shutter, and they quoted me about 200 Dollars at the camera repair shop, and I was going to Photo art school, as I could not afforded it, So my Photo Teacher told me try something that is quite strange as I did go to a Art store, and got Black Photographic Masking tape, and when I got he shown me, and cut a small sliver of the tape, and with a Cotton swap tip, and then with the mirror lock up feature, he shown me, and with the tape on the shutter plane that he use the Q-tip swap to hold the tape in place, and then with Tweezers he place on the other side with the other piece of tape. SO both sides have this FLAT piece of tape on the shutter. Now like I said that is my 2nd Nikon F that I bought, and today it is 2023, and Still have the Nikon-(Will Never sell my Gear!) and it is 2023 as the TAPE is still On the shutter, that it has not DRY out, and use it when I was in Japan, and Denmark, and France as ROLLS of film went through the model without a light leak... Oh that 50mm Nikkor H f/2.0, I have 3 of these lenses as One is the 5cm F/2.0 H, the other is 50mm F/2.0 H AI Converted, and the 50mm HC Nikkor F/2.0 AI as I find all the above one of the Nikon BEST SHARPEST lens that I have use, and use them on my DSLR Fuji's, and Nikon.... My Nikon F's date back as 2 are from 1968, and other one is from 1969 as it is motor drive Compatible as I have the F36 drive.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks Alex for taking the time to give that information.

    • @jean-claudemuller3199
      @jean-claudemuller3199 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These Nikon F's are not late model as these have plastic tips on film advance and selftimer levers

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      OK, thanks for the info.

  • @wulfrunian
    @wulfrunian 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I was a driver there, we had to stop at the end of the back road before turning right. I drove 862 quite a few times in my ten years as a driver there.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've driven it many times, in fact I passed out on it but none of the three have run for ages because of the re development of the site. I also used to drive the motor buses on occasions but the whole place has changed and not for the better IMHO.

    • @wulfrunian
      @wulfrunian 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I passed on Derby 237. They filmed my test as well and it’s on the video produced by DAVideo covering the 2002 rally. For a while I used to get recognised from that video, I’ve got a copy on DVD but haven’t watched it for a while.

  • @onkeltodor7601
    @onkeltodor7601 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for this video! I really enjoy these types of videos where there aren't many (or any at all) cuts since it's a nicer way of hearing people speak about things. A 37-minute video full of jumpcuts would be very tiring on the brain, but I had no problem watching this video all in one go 😄.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your very kind comment. I'm pleased you liked it.

  • @markmanning8933
    @markmanning8933 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great review

  • @langohr9613ify
    @langohr9613ify 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I got fungus in my front element. Is there any way to open that up?

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello, I really don't know. The front group come off, with a lot of care, but I'm sorry I don't know how anyone would remove the individual elements.

    • @langohr9613ify
      @langohr9613ify 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@northstar1950Ok thanks. There is a black ring of some sort. Do you know, if it has to be turned?

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@langohr9613ify I really don't know and can't advise on this one as I removed the entire front group as can be seen. I would imagine they might be cemented in place, so removal would be difficult. I really don't know enough about the lens to offer any worthwhile advice.

    • @langohr9613ify
      @langohr9613ify 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@northstar1950 Thanks anyway for your reply ;)

  • @johnrflinn
    @johnrflinn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Old shutter curtains are often problematic in old Leicas and Exaktas. Pinholes are very common and really show up when running a roll of film.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for your thoughts, to be honest I never did send the IIIf away as I'm not 100% convinced about my diagnosis!

  • @b_wtangible_moments
    @b_wtangible_moments ปีที่แล้ว

    I have to agree Summitar's are one of my favorite lenses in my collection. I have a 1946 10 bladed f2- 12.5 beautiful, and excellent performer copy. I don't know what original body it was on, but it is on my 1955 Leica iif. Love Barnack Leica's. To me they're the most beautiful camera's ever made and also underrated to the M models. Fantastic Video! Hope you get your 10 bladed Summitar Back.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks, the Summitar is back home and now on the camera I bought it with.

  • @northstar1950
    @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think that's unlikely to happen Harry but if it should I will bare your advice in mind.

  • @harryfaber
    @harryfaber ปีที่แล้ว

    In case it ever helps you when playing Scrabble with elderly French ladies, 'ASA' is in the official list of acceptable words for the French version. And it means the same in French as in English. Good stuff!

  • @markmueller5508
    @markmueller5508 ปีที่แล้ว

    The only thing that you skipped was the depth of field markings on the lens barrel and their relation to the aperture settings.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi, I always assume people who are interested enough to watch my humble efforts would know about these matters.

  • @WilliamCrespo
    @WilliamCrespo ปีที่แล้ว

    very helpful tutorial, I am searching to buy a IIIG if I can get one in good condition, I always liked these classic vintage cameras. Thanks for the video

  • @user-jr7nw8gy8e
    @user-jr7nw8gy8e ปีที่แล้ว

    I can do it😊😊😊

  • @theoldunsshot1005
    @theoldunsshot1005 ปีที่แล้ว

    The only lens I have attempted to fix was a Zuiko 50/1.8 with sticky iris blades. I ended up with a box of bits and a full swear jar. I am now retired and have a queue of cameras and lenses that need a little attention/swearing at. I hope you get it back together!

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's with a repairer at the moment.

  • @theoldunsshot1005
    @theoldunsshot1005 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating. I wonder if it is being used or just sitting in a display cabinet somewhere.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would imagine it's in a cabinet.

  • @studiogroup-go3ps
    @studiogroup-go3ps ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much. This was excellent information and demonstration!

  • @kurocamera
    @kurocamera ปีที่แล้ว

    Be careful when taking off and putting in the lens, it shouldn’t be collapsed when doing that as you may damage it. Great little lens, goes great with film and the Monochrom camera too.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can find anything online regarding damage other than mounting a collapsed lens on an M8 body. I did find reference to the possibility of it damaging the finish inside the camera but nothing else. Can you elaborate further? Thanks for taking the time to comment.

    • @kurocamera
      @kurocamera ปีที่แล้ว

      @@northstar1950 I never tried it myself but there are several threads on this on leica forum where it’s recommended to never mount or remove the lens when collapsed.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@kurocamerathanks for the information and I will try to remember in future

  • @stephen8577
    @stephen8577 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video, very helpful. 👍

  • @b_wtangible_moments
    @b_wtangible_moments ปีที่แล้ว

    Very Nice Lens! I have one on my Leica iif, I believe it was made in 1946 early single coated serial # 604571 aperture f2- 12.5 10 blades. It's definitely one of my favorite lenses. Happy Shooting! Thanks for sharing and Fantastic Captures!

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks and enjoy your IIIf.

  • @ohjajohh
    @ohjajohh ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! I hope to own a Leica/Leitz one day

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for that, I hope you find a good one. Best wishes.

  • @crispin8888
    @crispin8888 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting, thank you. I have two WW2 iic's with Summitars. I bought the appropriate filter holder and I will either add a standard UV filter or a red filter and try black and white film.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your kind comment.

  • @woopize
    @woopize ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi! I recently got a nice IIIb, got cla'd and seems works like a charm (I'll use the first roll during christmass with family) but I noticed that when I set it at 1/1000 the dial it's still slightly up in comparison as the other speeds. Have you ever noticed that in yours?

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello, I have just tried my IIIa and IIIb and they both do the same thing. It's probably just the way the pre war ones were designed. I hope you enjoy it. Take care.

    • @woopize
      @woopize ปีที่แล้ว

      @@northstar1950 great!! Thanks for the info!! 🖤

  • @vangstr
    @vangstr ปีที่แล้ว

    That's why I regret selling a lot of my former cameras.

  • @mikepxg6406
    @mikepxg6406 ปีที่แล้ว

    There isn’t a “Spotmatic 1” it’s just called a Spotmatic SP.

  • @TXGRunner
    @TXGRunner ปีที่แล้ว

    That was very informative. I learned two things specifically I did not know about my camera. Thanks.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

      Incidently I did an update about the IIIC K I once owned back in the 70s. Its on the video list. You might find that interesting. Thanks also for your kind comments.

  • @michaelbuckley8986
    @michaelbuckley8986 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just found your channel having purchased a iii made in 1938 .😊

  • @monochromebluess
    @monochromebluess ปีที่แล้ว

    Enjoyed the video. Looking to buy a Leica and your suggestions will help. Thanks

  • @monochromebluess
    @monochromebluess ปีที่แล้ว

    Great comparison. I have the Pentax ES II that came just after the Spotmatic 2. Can you advise what film types you are using in these cameras.

    • @northstar1950
      @northstar1950 ปีที่แล้ว

      I use Ilford FP4 and HP5. More recently I have tried Fomapan films as well.