วีดีโอ

Bu iki beyefendinin de kitabını okudum. Tanşuğ Bey'in kitabı kahkaha attırmıştır yer yer. (İran'dayken Sovyet Rusya elçisine ya Allah diyerek mürekkep fırlatılması sahnesi muhteşemdi😊) Hasan Bey'in kitabını da bugün bitirdim. Her ikisine de selamlarımı ve saygılarımı iletiyorum.🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

According to ,George Yeo China had handle covid very well.

I haven't been as disappointed as in this video for a long time. Even though all the questioners were Turks, no one thought of a single question about how much the current situations would affect Turkey? Instead of this, they all came together and made Mearsheimer retell the same topics he keeps repeating everywhere. If you wouldn't ask to explain or answer anything new, then why did so many people come together and shoot a 2-hour copy-pasted video? How is this different from the millions of videos that appear when you type "Mearsheimer" on TH-cam? It doesn't make any sense other than it being a deliberate choice. I feel sorry because it could have been a very satisfying video about Turkey, which we had never heard of anywhere before. But a men's club chose to waste this great opportunity. Pity

❤

❤Sizi seviyoruz. Nermin, Sevgi

Today need stopping China.

Faydalı bir yayın.

With all due respect, two points. You can’t refer to what is taking place in Palestine and Gaza as a War. Secondly you can’t refer to Gaza as a Prison. War is between states. Slaughtering women and children who can’t defend themselves is NOT a War, it is a War Crime. When would SOME countries in the region take some tangible steps to help instead of just talking.

You are amazing, John Mearsheimer

@tkk685 3 weeks ago A stark articulation of neocon thinking. Now we know who’s causing all the trouble in the region. 25 @jessejames7757 3 weeks ago This guy is part of the problem sad these old losers don't go away. @user-mx4uv2rc6v 5 months ago Professor M is a 1st class narcissist . . . [ Yes indeed, an old cantankerous narcissist & a war-mongering genocidal neocon. Mearsheimer will do anything to promote & keep alive his beloved (but out-dated, unrealistic) Offensive realism theory, even if it means perpetual wars, including nuclear wars ]. - Professor M is a 1st class narcissist . . . - And a blood-thirsty one too. @choisamwon2344 4 weeks ago I can understand why native Indians were all eliminated by the mind set of John and his ancestors in America. @fabio4465 4 days ago This old man is not in any condition to judge no one at all, he is completely insane. 6 Reply @marcosvidela7937 3 weeks ago I didn't know him as such a warmonger and US exceptionalist, disappointing @MRT-co1sd 3 weeks ago He’s a Neocon in a Realist skin @timneaves519 3 weeks ago Well said, I thought I must’ve misunderstood him because of his latest podcast and TH-cam appearances. Once a neocon always a neocon -Once a neocon always a neocon. @funtli 12 days ago The man is out of his mind @blackjackpinoko 3 weeks ago Self proclaimed realist is not a realist after all. @bobhan6395 4 weeks ago -John is too busy defending his contradicting positions, he is losing support for his academic theory. -It is sad to see brilliant mind like Mearsheimer diminishing his own achievements by contradicting his own logic. @metacomputist 1 month ago "contain", "contain", "contain", ..., "dominate", "dominate", "dominate", ... LOL ... He can't save himself from the imperialist's mindset @pengliu2087 1 month ago "US dominates the Western hemisphere, but I don't want China to dominate Asia the way we dominate west hemisphere"....hum fair enough I suppose? @aredtomato8957 1 month ago It's an obvious double standard by John. @bohanxu6125 1 month ago (edited) I can't believe the blatant tribalism coming from John Mearsheimer at 0:52. He is basically saying, "I want US to dominate not because US has a better system. I want US to dominate because I was born in US". Such thinking just feels so backward to me. @niarlatotepbasset 3 weeks ago He was always into U.S. global interests, only not in this crazy way that is leading to total collapse. @jane-ih4fo 5 months ago John is not just a fool, he is a liar. Other recent comments: -Prof. John Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory supports genocidal war in Gaza ( & elsewhere in the world) in order to uphold USA Hegemony & Primacy. -John Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory advocates USA Unipolar world domination & Supremacy. -Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory seeks to continue USA Hegemony in the world full of conflicts & wars ( including nuclear wars ). -Anyone who is curious about Mearsheimer should just google him and his stance on China. He's a Sinophobe. -John Mearsheimer is nothing but a unbridled gung-ho Warmonger, unabashed Exceptionist, genocidal Neocon. Totally unhinged. -This crazy psycho smiling and saying we are in the business of war and business is good tells you everything you need to know about him. -

@tkk685 3 weeks ago A stark articulation of neocon thinking. Now we know who’s causing all the trouble in the region. 25 @jessejames7757 3 weeks ago This guy is part of the problem sad these old losers don't go away. @user-mx4uv2rc6v 5 months ago Professor M is a 1st class narcissist . . . [ Yes indeed, an old cantankerous narcissist & a war-mongering genocidal neocon. Mearsheimer will do anything to promote & keep alive his beloved (but out-dated, unrealistic) Offensive realism theory, even if it means perpetual wars, including nuclear wars ]. - Professor M is a 1st class narcissist . . . - And a blood-thirsty one too. @choisamwon2344 4 weeks ago I can understand why native Indians were all eliminated by the mind set of John and his ancestors in America. @fabio4465 4 days ago This old man is not in any condition to judge no one at all, he is completely insane. 6 Reply @marcosvidela7937 3 weeks ago I didn't know him as such a warmonger and US exceptionalist, disappointing @MRT-co1sd 3 weeks ago He’s a Neocon in a Realist skin @timneaves519 3 weeks ago Well said, I thought I must’ve misunderstood him because of his latest podcast and TH-cam appearances. Once a neocon always a neocon -Once a neocon always a neocon. @funtli 12 days ago The man is out of his mind @blackjackpinoko 3 weeks ago Self proclaimed realist is not a realist after all. @bobhan6395 4 weeks ago -John is too busy defending his contradicting positions, he is losing support for his academic theory. -It is sad to see brilliant mind like Mearsheimer diminishing his own achievements by contradicting his own logic. @metacomputist 1 month ago "contain", "contain", "contain", ..., "dominate", "dominate", "dominate", ... LOL ... He can't save himself from the imperialist's mindset @pengliu2087 1 month ago "US dominates the Western hemisphere, but I don't want China to dominate Asia the way we dominate west hemisphere"....hum fair enough I suppose? @aredtomato8957 1 month ago It's an obvious double standard by John. @bohanxu6125 1 month ago (edited) I can't believe the blatant tribalism coming from John Mearsheimer at 0:52. He is basically saying, "I want US to dominate not because US has a better system. I want US to dominate because I was born in US". Such thinking just feels so backward to me. @niarlatotepbasset 3 weeks ago He was always into U.S. global interests, only not in this crazy way that is leading to total collapse. @jane-ih4fo 5 months ago John is not just a fool, he is a liar. Other recent comments: -Prof. John Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory supports genocidal war in Gaza ( & elsewhere in the world) in order to uphold USA Hegemony & Primacy. -John Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory advocates USA Unipolar world domination & Supremacy. -Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory seeks to continue USA Hegemony in the world full of conflicts & wars ( including nuclear wars ). -Anyone who is curious about Mearsheimer should just google him and his stance on China. He's a Sinophobe. -John Mearsheimer is nothing but a unbridled gung-ho Warmonger, unabashed Exceptionist, genocidal Neocon. Totally unhinged. -This crazy psycho smiling and saying we are in the business of war and business is good tells you everything you need to know about him. -

@davidrave563 @davidrave563 3 weeks ago When it comes to China he still has a colonial mindset. 46 Reply @waxeggoil3130 @waxeggoil3130 3 weeks ago I think the professor doesn't have a great understanding of China really. He bases his realism on Anglo European values of dominance and power. I think it has Always been his greatest shortcoming. Politicians in the USA tend to think this way too. They project their own colonialist mentality into the Chinese, project their own desire to solve every problem with violence and war. 30 Reply @remisofola5703 @remisofola5703 3 weeks ago It is sad to hear the professor say that the US should contain China over Taiwan, this is unrealistic but US has to play its hand given the fact that it is in decline and has been surpassed militarily in the area of Asia by China. 85 Reply @seer7327 @seer7327 3 weeks ago Containing China IS confronting China. His logic fails here. 80 Reply @robertyw2842 @robertyw2842 3 weeks ago Mearsheimer's ignorance on China's capability both militarily and economically is so bad that it's dangerous if China is indeed an enemy as he claimed! And his assessment of China's intention are nothing but projection; this dude is well well over rated.....! 32 Reply @CAlicocat711 @CAlicocat711 3 weeks ago Dear Prof. Mearsheimer, I'm in total agreement with you on everything else, but I clash violently with your take on China. Why, if we control the Western Hemisphere isn't that enough for our protection? China is not expanding except for a few atolls and inlets in their area. (We have the 800+ bases around the world.) And Taiwan belongs to them! 68 Reply 4 replies @jamaican_4_life95 @jamaican_4_life95 3 weeks ago I gotta say proffessor, I don't agree with your logic of seeing China as a threat to the US' interest. The more options smaller countries have to choose from, the better. The current mafia tactic that the world is subjected to isn't working. I can hear the American exceptionalism oozing out of this interview. The world has moved on and ot is in the interest of each government schoose whats better for their country rather tham following some unwritten order no 1 knows about that allows a few country to live above the many. Why is that? Kudos to Russia for following up on their red line. Sadly, others will follow. The world has to experience chaos in order to appreciate peace. 🙏 58 Reply 1 reply @tkk685 @tkk685 3 weeks ago A stark articulation of neocon thinking. Now we know who’s causing all the trouble in the region. 25 Reply 1 reply @ly1465 @ly1465 3 weeks ago As leveled headed as Mearsheimer is, he still got an egocentric POV where US must contain each & every emerging threats around the world in order to maintain its status quo. This is the thinking that got us all to where we are today and the very undoing of what it’s trying to maintain. 11 Reply @tiffanytran5712 @tiffanytran5712 3 weeks ago Disappointed in his assessment of China. Why does he think it’s ok to contain China while deductive reasoning would conclude that containment of any country by the US never ended up well. It’s pure US hegemony. Has China started any war in the last 40 years? Can we say the same for the US? 270 Reply 36 replies @jessejames7757 @jessejames7757 3 weeks ago This guy is part of the problem sad these old losers don't go away. 43 Reply @DailyBeatings @DailyBeatings 3 weeks ago Completely disagree with Mearsheimer about the containment theory. China for most of its existence was a regional power until western nations subjected them during the "Century of Humiliation". In their 5,000 year history China did not have any ambitions to project power beyond its sphere and to this day still view the west as "Barbarians", so why would they imitate what they despise? It makes absolutely no sense from a cultural, philosophical, and historical perspective. 129 Reply 29 replies @blackjackpinoko @blackjackpinoko 3 weeks ago Professor, you missed the fact that the US is trillions in debt. Still want to maintain as a world hegemony? 42 Reply 3 replies @blackjackpinoko @blackjackpinoko 3 weeks ago Self proclaimed realist is not a realist after all. 56 Reply @SimonMoniker @SimonMoniker 3 weeks ago Disappointing to learn that the professor thinks it's "realistic" to continue down this path of superfluous US militarism around the globe whilst saddled with trillions in debt, mounting troubles at home and a slew of embarrassing failures eg Afghanistan, Iraq and so on 30 Reply 4 replies @joechiara @joechiara 3 weeks ago I think Col Macgregor has a much better handle on the situation re China and China and Taiwan. I think the Professor is missing the mark on this one, but no one hits the mark all the time. 51 Reply 4 replies @js70371 @js70371 3 weeks ago American hubris and exceptionalism on full display here - not your best performance by far Professor Mearsheimer. 4/10 👎 56 Reply @jessejames7757 @jessejames7757 3 weeks ago This crazy psycho smiling and saying we are in the business of war and business is good tells you everything you need to know about him. 27 Reply 2 replies @mfromaustralia1 @mfromaustralia1 3 weeks ago Speaking from one of the poodle countries, i.e. Australia, I have to say Professor Mearsheimer has really got it wrong this time about Taiwan. Oh well, no-one can get it right all the time. Reply @user-vm5hr2ko7h @user-vm5hr2ko7h 2 weeks ago Please do not be conned by Prof. John Mearsheimer with his dodgy theory & feisty viewpoint. This theory has more holes than a Swiss Cheese. Ex- Australian PM Scott Morrison was one of the hot-headed, unwary, simple-minded politicians conned by John Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory. As a result of being conned by John Mearsheimer, Australia suffered several years of disastrous trade & diplomatic debacle with China. Thank God these mistakes have now been rectified by the current Australian PM Anthony Albanese. Warning to all politicians & citizens - please do not get conned again by John Mearsheimer & his dodgy Offensive realism theory. An unrealistic realism theory. How ironic. Prof. John Mearsheimer is well-known for his anti-Chinese racialism, anti-China phobia, war-mongering views toward China & despicable genocidal sentiment. Prof. Mearsheimer claims to have many friends in China ! How deluded and unrealistic is that. 1 other previous comment: @Time4Peace 7 months ago @esoterri8447 Agreed with your view. I have followed Mearsheimer for many years and watched his talks and debates in different countries. In Australia about 5 years ago, he was more to the point asking whether Australians are more comfortable with American or Chinese as a hegemon. He was debating with Hugh White associated with the anti-China ASPI, hardly an opponent in the debate! Australia had better relationship with China then. I feel Mearsheimer is not just an academic explaining his analysis but a passionate hawk on China out to persuade his audience that China must be contained even at the risk of a war. His argument that a multipolar world will diminish international world order is untenable. China is the one who wants to strengthen UN laws and order, applying fairly to all nations. US, on the other hand, unilaterally picks and chooses when and what laws to observe. It does not subscribe to the laws of the seas nor international tribunal but will use them as tools against countries when needed. For example, many sanctions and invasions are illegitimate based on UN laws. It (with Europe) controls IMF and the World Bank in loans handed out and their conditions It's unfortunate (and dangerously so) that it is using Taiwan (and it seems also Philippines) to trigger situations for a cold and even hot war with China. Show less 27 @Time4Peace 7 months ago @esoterri8447 Hugh was the inaugural Director of ASPI (which was partly funded by the US weapons corporations). He has continued to write for ASPI. He has been criticised by colleagues to have been bellicose on China and exaggerates its threat, and to recommend costly weaponry for defense (war). In the debate between Mearsheimer vs Hugh White, Mearsheimer argued asked whether Australians are more comfortable under US or China as the hegemon. Hugh gave such weak arguments against Mearsheimer (and even agreeing with him at some points) that the debate was clearly a farce, a ploy to swing Australian elites against China. At that time, Australia-China relationship was still positive Show less 2 Reply @robertyw2842 @robertyw2842 3 weeks ago Mearsheimer's ignorance on China's capability both militarily and economically is so bad that it's dangerous if China is indeed an enemy as he claimed! And his assessment of China's intention are nothing but projection; this dude is well well over rated.....! 32 Reply @mikejones3810 @mikejones3810 10 days ago As a citizen of the United States, I have never heard a compelling argument about Ukraine, a country bordering Russia being a strategic security risk for our nation. 135 Reply 14 replies @perceivedreality7933 @perceivedreality7933 11 days ago The globalists wanted to make a fool out of Russia. But instead, the globalists ended up making fools of themselves. Let that be a lesson. 136 Reply 5 replies @hectorshouse7348 @hectorshouse7348 11 days ago Anyone else fed up with the USA and U.K. causing trouble all over the world? Reply

Forget about China! China is closely watching how U.S. behaviors in the Russian-Ukraine war! If they found U.S. was such soft like this even with the obligation to the Budapest Memorandum, they will definitely attack Taiwan! I bet those Russian agents are also appeasers to China, never dare to fight! Such an idiot gets a professor position in U. of Chicago? Hard to believe!

great conversation. However, I was a bit disappointed that despite the Turkish audience, no one asked him any questions relating to Turkey. I was looking forward to hearing his opinions in a new topic, as oppposed to Palestine and Ukraine, both of which he has previously talked at length about.

I question the 'realism' of someone who takes for granted nation-states and 'power politics'. Studied as a living being, a human being has no NEED for nation-states. (We all need rich flora and fauna; and all nation-states of our time appear to be bent on destroying them --at different rates.) It is true that, in our time, most 'stateless' persons are worse off than the citizens of even some of the poorest nation-states. But this is due to the deliberate policies of empires, nation-states, and city-states that ended up gobbling up most livable places on our planet. If a large part of humankind managed to put an end to antagonism among empires, nation-states, and all organized human societies, our species would be in a better position to solve or alleviate the countless problems that we face today. Some of these problems were caused by people who bought into the 'wisdom' of people like Mearsheimer. The minute that the man speaks of the rationality of manufacturing and maintaining nuclear weapons, a more sensible moderator could have cut off his mike, and apologized to the rest of the participants for having bothered to organize this meeting.

@davidrave563 @davidrave563 3 weeks ago When it comes to China he still has a colonial mindset. 46 Reply @waxeggoil3130 @waxeggoil3130 3 weeks ago I think the professor doesn't have a great understanding of China really. He bases his realism on Anglo European values of dominance and power. I think it has Always been his greatest shortcoming. Politicians in the USA tend to think this way too. They project their own colonialist mentality into the Chinese, project their own desire to solve every problem with violence and war. 30 Reply @remisofola5703 @remisofola5703 3 weeks ago It is sad to hear the professor say that the US should contain China over Taiwan, this is unrealistic but US has to play its hand given the fact that it is in decline and has been surpassed militarily in the area of Asia by China. 85 Reply @seer7327 @seer7327 3 weeks ago Containing China IS confronting China. His logic fails here. 80 Reply @robertyw2842 @robertyw2842 3 weeks ago Mearsheimer's ignorance on China's capability both militarily and economically is so bad that it's dangerous if China is indeed an enemy as he claimed! And his assessment of China's intention are nothing but projection; this dude is well well over rated.....! 32 Reply @CAlicocat711 @CAlicocat711 3 weeks ago Dear Prof. Mearsheimer, I'm in total agreement with you on everything else, but I clash violently with your take on China. Why, if we control the Western Hemisphere isn't that enough for our protection? China is not expanding except for a few atolls and inlets in their area. (We have the 800+ bases around the world.) And Taiwan belongs to them! 68 Reply 4 replies @jamaican_4_life95 @jamaican_4_life95 3 weeks ago I gotta say proffessor, I don't agree with your logic of seeing China as a threat to the US' interest. The more options smaller countries have to choose from, the better. The current mafia tactic that the world is subjected to isn't working. I can hear the American exceptionalism oozing out of this interview. The world has moved on and ot is in the interest of each government schoose whats better for their country rather tham following some unwritten order no 1 knows about that allows a few country to live above the many. Why is that? Kudos to Russia for following up on their red line. Sadly, others will follow. The world has to experience chaos in order to appreciate peace. 🙏 58 Reply 1 reply @tkk685 @tkk685 3 weeks ago A stark articulation of neocon thinking. Now we know who’s causing all the trouble in the region. 25 Reply 1 reply @ly1465 @ly1465 3 weeks ago As leveled headed as Mearsheimer is, he still got an egocentric POV where US must contain each & every emerging threats around the world in order to maintain its status quo. This is the thinking that got us all to where we are today and the very undoing of what it’s trying to maintain. 11 Reply @tiffanytran5712 @tiffanytran5712 3 weeks ago Disappointed in his assessment of China. Why does he think it’s ok to contain China while deductive reasoning would conclude that containment of any country by the US never ended up well. It’s pure US hegemony. Has China started any war in the last 40 years? Can we say the same for the US? 270 Reply 36 replies @jessejames7757 @jessejames7757 3 weeks ago This guy is part of the problem sad these old losers don't go away. 43 Reply @DailyBeatings @DailyBeatings 3 weeks ago Completely disagree with Mearsheimer about the containment theory. China for most of its existence was a regional power until western nations subjected them during the "Century of Humiliation". In their 5,000 year history China did not have any ambitions to project power beyond its sphere and to this day still view the west as "Barbarians", so why would they imitate what they despise? It makes absolutely no sense from a cultural, philosophical, and historical perspective. 129 Reply 29 replies @blackjackpinoko @blackjackpinoko 3 weeks ago Professor, you missed the fact that the US is trillions in debt. Still want to maintain as a world hegemony? 42 Reply 3 replies @blackjackpinoko @blackjackpinoko 3 weeks ago Self proclaimed realist is not a realist after all. 56 Reply @SimonMoniker @SimonMoniker 3 weeks ago Disappointing to learn that the professor thinks it's "realistic" to continue down this path of superfluous US militarism around the globe whilst saddled with trillions in debt, mounting troubles at home and a slew of embarrassing failures eg Afghanistan, Iraq and so on 30 Reply 4 replies @joechiara @joechiara 3 weeks ago I think Col Macgregor has a much better handle on the situation re China and China and Taiwan. I think the Professor is missing the mark on this one, but no one hits the mark all the time. 51 Reply 4 replies @js70371 @js70371 3 weeks ago American hubris and exceptionalism on full display here - not your best performance by far Professor Mearsheimer. 4/10 👎 56 Reply @jessejames7757 @jessejames7757 3 weeks ago This crazy psycho smiling and saying we are in the business of war and business is good tells you everything you need to know about him. 27 Reply 2 replies @mfromaustralia1 @mfromaustralia1 3 weeks ago Speaking from one of the poodle countries, i.e. Australia, I have to say Professor Mearsheimer has really got it wrong this time about Taiwan. Oh well, no-one can get it right all the time. Reply @user-vm5hr2ko7h @user-vm5hr2ko7h 2 weeks ago Please do not be conned by Prof. John Mearsheimer with his dodgy theory & feisty viewpoint. This theory has more holes than a Swiss Cheese. Ex- Australian PM Scott Morrison was one of the hot-headed, unwary, simple-minded politicians conned by John Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory. As a result of being conned by John Mearsheimer, Australia suffered several years of disastrous trade & diplomatic debacle with China. Thank God these mistakes have now been rectified by the current Australian PM Anthony Albanese. Warning to all politicians & citizens - please do not get conned again by John Mearsheimer & his dodgy Offensive realism theory. An unrealistic realism theory. How ironic. Prof. John Mearsheimer is well-known for his anti-Chinese racialism, anti-China phobia, war-mongering views toward China & despicable genocidal sentiment. Prof. Mearsheimer claims to have many friends in China ! How deluded and unrealistic is that. 1 other previous comment: @Time4Peace 7 months ago @esoterri8447 Agreed with your view. I have followed Mearsheimer for many years and watched his talks and debates in different countries. In Australia about 5 years ago, he was more to the point asking whether Australians are more comfortable with American or Chinese as a hegemon. He was debating with Hugh White associated with the anti-China ASPI, hardly an opponent in the debate! Australia had better relationship with China then. I feel Mearsheimer is not just an academic explaining his analysis but a passionate hawk on China out to persuade his audience that China must be contained even at the risk of a war. His argument that a multipolar world will diminish international world order is untenable. China is the one who wants to strengthen UN laws and order, applying fairly to all nations. US, on the other hand, unilaterally picks and chooses when and what laws to observe. It does not subscribe to the laws of the seas nor international tribunal but will use them as tools against countries when needed. For example, many sanctions and invasions are illegitimate based on UN laws. It (with Europe) controls IMF and the World Bank in loans handed out and their conditions It's unfortunate (and dangerously so) that it is using Taiwan (and it seems also Philippines) to trigger situations for a cold and even hot war with China. Show less 27 @Time4Peace 7 months ago @esoterri8447 Hugh was the inaugural Director of ASPI (which was partly funded by the US weapons corporations). He has continued to write for ASPI. He has been criticised by colleagues to have been bellicose on China and exaggerates its threat, and to recommend costly weaponry for defense (war). In the debate between Mearsheimer vs Hugh White, Mearsheimer argued asked whether Australians are more comfortable under US or China as the hegemon. Hugh gave such weak arguments against Mearsheimer (and even agreeing with him at some points) that the debate was clearly a farce, a ploy to swing Australian elites against China. At that time, Australia-China relationship was still positive Show less 2 Reply @robertyw2842 @robertyw2842 3 weeks ago Mearsheimer's ignorance on China's capability both militarily and economically is so bad that it's dangerous if China is indeed an enemy as he claimed! And his assessment of China's intention are nothing but projection; this dude is well well over rated.....! 32 Reply @mikejones3810 @mikejones3810 10 days ago As a citizen of the United States, I have never heard a compelling argument about Ukraine, a country bordering Russia being a strategic security risk for our nation. 135 Reply 14 replies @perceivedreality7933 @perceivedreality7933 11 days ago The globalists wanted to make a fool out of Russia. But instead, the globalists ended up making fools of themselves. Let that be a lesson. 136 Reply 5 replies @hectorshouse7348 @hectorshouse7348 11 days ago Anyone else fed up with the USA and U.K. causing trouble all over the world? Reply 1 Reply

He is the best

The PR is speaking from his high pedestal i wish he turns around and give a glance at the state of his country the homeless the destitutes the infra structure the only way to deter the evil empire is to be like north korea

500 years of European white mans hegemony is coming to an end now Bull shit talk folks

Prof just nailed it.

You can tell Mearsheimer read the NYT before he gave his talk; and maybe the Washington Post. So informed. Wow!

America tried nation-building for 20 years in Afghanistan. We lost because this is more mass psyops and occupation of a population with insurgency resistance fighters to turn them into a liberal democracy. The project failed, but luckily we left, which is the good news. On the other side of the coin, Israel wants to attempt ethnic cleansing, but USA has a threshold for what it allows Israel to do, and has already placed sanctions on violent settlers. They won't be able to succeed with ethnic cleansing because USA will cut its support, and Israel risks further horizontal escalation with the regional forces and their sea lanes will be at risk as well. Their tourism will also suffer since no one will visit due to the lack of stable security. Conscription into the army will also pull people off needed manual labor force. Israel is facing a tumultuous future if they don't see that redrawing the map to physically separate the two populations is the only solution. Urban warfare with tunnels against an occupied population with resistance fighters is not a viable solution. They will do that forever.

Henry Kissinger - 'It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal.'

Mearsheimer starts @4:32

John Mearsheimer well known Geopolitic Scientist, highly influential & respected in China,Russia,USA,UK & Australia...not admirable in Western countries 😢

Thank you Mr. Mearsheimer. If Russia can somehow keep the territories in Ukraine and force Ukraine to a ceasefire, I was wondering what will stop them to go in say Georgia or Kazakhstan.

what John said was well known all along, but it's not that easy to hear it from an American, especially such a professional American.

How does a realist explain why American elites completely self-destructively back Israel unconditionally when Israel openly covets and acts toward a greater Israel? They are not all Christian zionists. I can't wait for that epstein list coming out in a month or so.

Mükemmel🙏🙏🙏

It is puzzling that the Professor in his analysis reinforced the US’s hostile position towards China. US sanctioned China after WWII; US relaxed the sanctions in 1970’s and invited China into the WTO. US, and Europe have traded with China since. The acrimony stems from the fear of unbalanced of trade in terms of capacity and ability on the part of the US. COVID and what it has revealed changes everything. We need to ask, why such hostility since trade is still on-going and the virus is a US-China joint enterprise! They are collaborating, not competing. Are we watching theatre?

Where is evidence that China wants to dominate Asia? None at all. China can't even dominate Taiwan, how to dominate Asia? Russia can't even dominate Ukraine, how to dominate Europe?

1:19:38 / 1:47:18

Professor Mearscheimer is mistaken in one important respect - US has lost its military technology superiority, and not to China but Russia.

Excellent discussion!

Só a Russia para organizar isso

Are the women permitted to ask questions?

Harikasınız çok teşekkürler

The Colak guy was very weird. "I do not agree with anything you said Mr. Mearsheimer. And I think everything you said is wrong. I will not dispute or explain anything, just gonna mention that." What is the purpose of his statement? What was he trying to achieve here?

Prof. Mearsheimer's conclusions are all based on the premise that the US is very strong and cannot be forced to accept political solutions that it does not like. That is a false premise. The US is weaker and weaker and OF COURSE THAT THE US WILL BE FORCED TO ACCEPT POLITICAL SOLUTIONS THAT IT DOES NOT LIKE BOTH IN UKRAINE AND IN PALESTINE

The rhetorical question is quite foolish. It's very simple. As president Obama understood and stated at the time this fiasco started when his state department run by Hilary Clinton engineered the coup in 2014, Russia has escalatory dominance. They can take this any way you want to go. No matter what move or how you take it, they have the answer for it. Because quite frankly Russia is the hegemon in that region of the world, not the United States or anyone. Russia has been using an economy of force strategy from the start of the war. Not even breaking a sweat. Too often people speak about these matters as if the pre 2014 status quo never existed. Russia did not change the status quo, the United States with it's European poodles changed the status quo in 2014. History did not begin in 2022 with the war or 2014 with the successful coup. The current post Soviet status quo had existed in that region since 1991.

the people love the honorable professor.

ilginç bir oturum. Ama guzel.

Mearsheimer claimed Putin wouldn't attack Ukraine. Guess how that turned out. Also casualty exchange rates according to who? Russian propaganda? Even some of those who say Ukraine needs to take less casualties to win in the long run say Russia has taken more casalties.

@19:55 on top of all

Thank you Prof. Mearsheimer! Organize ettiğiniz için ayrıca teşekkürler

Mearsheimer just speaks with such clarity and wisdom he makes all these neocon experts on russia look like kids in big boys club. Thank you for this excellent discussion. Mearsheimer is one of the consequential IR scholar in the world today.

As an 86 year Goan Indian American born raised & educated in India -50years an - Elec Engineer and 36 years in Georgia US, & NOT a politician like Kishore & certainly not having his great reputation, my humble opinion is that Kishore sounds to me like a smooth Sindhi car salesman who says 1) he loves the US & wants to give them “ wise advice” & 2) that China has only “goodwill towards the world”. But as an ex-Indian like me, he should be aware that China wants a “ one China Policy” for itself but does NOT want a “one India Policy” for India - has brutally occupied Previously Autonomous TIBET & now parts of the Indian Himalayas- 100,000 Indian- Chinese troops are presently facing each other there on the LAC eyeball to eyeball at the moment & war can breakout between the two if this persists. India got its Independence in 1947 after not “ 100 years of humiliation” but almost 200 years of humiliation by the same colonial powers that China had endured. So Kishore talks as if this “humiliation” happened only to China and not to the whole of Asia & Africa. This selective opinion shows his bias towards China - why I can’t fathom- does book sales have something to do with it ? The Communist Peoples Republic of China was established by Mao in 1949. At that time India & China had about the same GDP- however the U.S. switched its allegiance from from the KMT (30 million?)to the the over 1 billion PRC ( bigger future market for its goods) & then collaborated with Communist Dictatorial China over “democratic India “ - much against its “freedom & democratic principles” with heavy investment by its companies in China thus raising its present GDP to 6x times India’s - near 19 trillion U.S. $ that it is today. Of course China’s hard working people & Autocratic Govt’s had much to do with it verses Indias “ democratic & easy going people” - something I prefer- with 1.4 billion people & 2.4 billion opinions. India will catch up but will take another 20 years- with its intelligent & enterprising people with its more than 4000 year civilization - of which Kishore should be aware of. Sydney Desouza a Goan Indian American immigrant from India now in the U.S. Georgia for 36 years

Bu bilgiler kiymetli olup, her yerde bulamayacağımız türdendir! Başarılı diplomatlarımızdan Yaratıcı olan Tanrı ve tüm insanlık razı olsun.

It's indo pacific

This host's question is terribly long!!