วีดีโอ

Why didn't you take Ireland? Its population would have been very useful to you.

Charismatic and organized are my favorites

Catherine.....if Taylor Swift was a leader of the world (that angry hair flip turnaround 😂)

Subscribed....good list. I'd make a couple of notes... 1. The unique units should be judged on their impact later in the game through their unique promotions that they get to keep...this means a Gallic Warrior gets thay sweet hill bonus for free, which will be inherited if you upgrage the unit (which can be expensive, but helpful for units like it and the Orono. Also, the unique units should be judged on the leaders/civs they can be built with. The charismatic Boudica allows those Gallic Warriors to get those promotions quicker and the special stable helps the mongolian horse units.

Hey dude, write a script next time. You also sound like you're bored to tears

Your utopia sounds like it would be an absolutely horrid country to belong to IRL. :)

Where i can take this custom scenarios for BTS? 😮😮😮 I realy would like to take and play them immidiately!!!

I've found every civic has its time and place. Even pacifism. As another poster pointed out, mercantilism has its uses. It can help boost production.

Destroyers are fast and come earlier than Battleships. They can also spot Submarines. 2-move units in general are powerful and Chariots come very early. They can fend off barbs for a long time and make great scouts. Horse Archers are very good units. Strength 6 in the ancient age is about as high as it gets and 2-move units are again powerful. Depending on difficulty, you can stomp the AI with them if you rush early enough. Airships go very well with Cavalry. They don't require oil, come earlier than Flight, and actually have more range than Fighters. I have more disagreements, but I think all of the above units deserve better rankings than being at the near bottom.

is it interesting to play on a marathon and skip 100 moves to learn one technology? maybe it's worth choosing a faster difficulty?

In Civ 4 its not as big a deal, but in CIV 3, I despised playing against expansionist civilizations

I never could get into Civ IV. Civ V just always seemed like an objectively better game in every single regard. Why do some people prefer IV? Does it have areas where it is actually better than Civ V or is it just flavor preference?

Reklam 1 dakika ya

This list is 100% correct.

TH-cam pay for this video ❤❤❤

Man the nostalgia when I hear the menu music and see the screen is incredible! Thank you sir!

Oh god no, not at all! This is kinda the other way around if anything

Did you not consider the various uu/ub ?

Nice!

Hi! Can you please describe how to make changes to the earth 18 civs scenrario?

Thank you so much for the support everyone. I'm glad to be getting back to some Civ!

Why did you build a monument in your capital? That seems unnecessary because of the culture from your palace.

Welcome back fellow civver! I've also been cooking with Malinese on E18 the last few months, very interesting to see your pov.

He back!

Welcome back!!! Glad to see you uploading again :)

what map editor did u use?

link download please.

if you are planning to come back, are you willing to try other mods? there are some really great ones that could maybe refresh your motivation to play civ 4: History Rewritten, Caveman2Cosmos, RFC Dawn of Civilization, Civ 4 reimagined. what do you think?

I am not that good, could you tell me why you went for drama and music like that making pavilions everywhere? Isn't culture only good if you can take over an enemy city with it?

where you at

Damn, 1 year already

You play on marathon instead of default settings, which invalidates the whole list. Thanks for letting us know at the start at least!

I love Cataphracts.

That was no mediocre attempt at an evaluation 😊

Have you tried civ 4 Legends of Revolution mod? It is excellent!

Horse archer rushes are extremely effective and I'm very surprised you'd put them so low. Are they Cuirassier or War Chariot level? No, but they can be used even on deity to great effect.

I'm a rookie but in my small experience it feels like the pyramids are a wonder that AI leaders just forget about entirely lol

Hey, whenever you come back from your hiatus, would love a world wonder tier list for civ 4 bts!

This list is crap as Huyana Capac is hands down the best leader in the game as his terraces give him the culture buff creative leaders get and your going to want granaries anyway. You also overstate the value of protective, if you're enaging in a defensive war then your diplomacy is already failing and its almost useless against AI players anyway so you only get the best value from the trait in multiplayer games but even then there are other better options. Industrious is also undervalued here as half price forges as well as quicker wonder production means more wonders or more fail gold. Philosophical is also good with specialist economies, which are favored by more experienced players and are more resilient in multiplayer games. Overall, this list seems to be biased towards a certain playstyle and doesnt account for different strategies that can be employed. There are better tier lists that arent geared towards a certain type of play and also account for the UU and UB of each civilization.

I like going for Versaille after I’ve conquered a major rival or two and need to reduce their cities’ squalor to hell convert them faster.

If memory serves, it’s still good to get Three Gorges because the electricity it provides obsoletes your Coal Plants and thus their pollution and health penalties are still removed.

Oracle is definitely awesome. I slingshotted from the Ancient Era all the way to the Medieval Era with it, once, by grabbing Theology. The fact that my Civ became so culturally-advanced so quickly was a massive boost for that game.

Stonehenge is one of those All or Nothing wonders for a non-Creative leader: Get it, and you’re a step ahead of most of your rivals because you can focus a new city on building production and economy buildings instead of having to get out a Monument to start expanding. Focusing either of those means you can then build religious buildings faster once you start factoring those in. Don’t get Stonehenge, and your game isn’t over but you’re definitely now a step behind your rivals because of the AI bonuses. Not insurmountable, but definitely annoying.

Aquaculture doesn't exist in Civ 4.

Parthenon increases the production of great people. Makes u like a philosophy trait. And is essential for culture victory.. if u build this this city will pump out great artist mainly. If u build Great Wall the city more likely to produce great spy … not good.

You do a really good job, but would you consider a best Tech Tree path? Or is that somewhere else?

Not going to play on hard difficulties any time soon but it's really interesting to hear a pro player opinion! Besides, the blooper on 23:25 is so cute ❤️

Huanya Capac when you look at the overall history of CIV IV is an automatic S-Tier civilization. He first appeared in the base game as Aggressive and Financial, then they lost Aggressive and replaced it with Industrious, his Quechuas still have Combat 1 like he didn’t lose Aggressive and his unique Granary grants the same culture bonus as Creative; the Incas have the unique situation of being a civilization with four traits instead of the normal two.

Reculll tengo ganas de una computadora y el winning eleven , me dieron ganas

Reculll mi juego favorito