- 27
- 172 472
Sebastian von Thaden
Germany
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 11 มี.ค. 2012
On this channel I explain everything around MODERN CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE.
Sometimes also other things, that I am interested in.
I am Sebastian, a German architect and university lecturer.
Subscribe me, please! :- )
Learn how to properly design Classical Architecture:
www.classical-architecture.org
Sometimes also other things, that I am interested in.
I am Sebastian, a German architect and university lecturer.
Subscribe me, please! :- )
Learn how to properly design Classical Architecture:
www.classical-architecture.org
New Classical Architecture: Learn in Private Teaching how to create correct “Classical Architecture”
If you want to learn how to really design Classical Architecture, there is great way for you:
The Academy for Classical Architecture: www.classical-architecture.org
I am Sebastian von Thaden, a German architect and University Lecturer.
Check out my new academy and leave a message there for me!
Also, do not forget to subscribe to me! ;- )
The Academy for Classical Architecture: www.classical-architecture.org
I am Sebastian von Thaden, a German architect and University Lecturer.
Check out my new academy and leave a message there for me!
Also, do not forget to subscribe to me! ;- )
มุมมอง: 480
วีดีโอ
Modern Classical Architecture: I show my own Design
มุมมอง 8333 หลายเดือนก่อน
In this new video I show some of my Own Architecture Projects - in the “Modern Classical” Style. I am dedicated to apply the “timeless grammar” of Classical Architecture to my designs, that I lay out in another video - but at the same time to reduce the forms to make the building fit in our current time. Let me know in the comments which design you like and where you disagree with what I say. I...
AI + Architecture = GREAT results!? How to train DALL-E to create stunning Architecture
มุมมอง 4264 หลายเดือนก่อน
In this conversation with Prof. Dr. Michael Mehaffy and Prof. Dr. Nikos Salingaros we discover ways to train AI (like Midjourney or DALL-E) to create human-centred and good Architecture. If you are interested in Architecture and the future of mankind you should watch this conversation. More importantly, don’t forget to subscribe me!!!!! t1p.de/svonthaden I am Sebastian von Thaden - a German Arc...
How Modern Architecture makes you SICK: Interview with Prof. Dr. Nikos Salingaros
มุมมอง 2.7K5 หลายเดือนก่อน
FACTS from medicine and psychology show: Modern Architecture is not good for humans! Listen to the full interview based on academic research findings here. And don’t forget to subscribe to my channel! ;- ) I am Sebastian - a German Architect and University Lecturer. The academic research paper that we talk about you can access here: neuro-architectology.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Architectu...
Proportions in Architecture: All you need to know (University Lecture)
มุมมอง 8K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
Many of you asked me about Proportions in Architecture. They are important for Architectural Design. Here I explain all the different Systems - and all you need to know about Proportions in Architecture. I am Sebastian - a German Architect and University Lecturer. Subscribe me, please! : ) Let me know in the comments if you have ideas or wishes for new video topics!
The Errors of Modern Architecture: BEAUTY - Why Beauty is more objective than you think
มุมมอง 1.3K8 หลายเดือนก่อน
"Beauty is relative" say the Modernists. But this is not true. In this Video I show why. #architecture #modernarchitecture #classical I am Sebastian - a German Architect and University Lecturer. Subscribe me, please! : )
Since Modern Architecture FAILED: How to build BETTER
มุมมอง 5K9 หลายเดือนก่อน
Modern Architecture has failed. And everyone knows it. In this Video I present my ideas for a New Vision of Architecture for the Future - using Timeless Elements of Architecture from the Past, that have proven successful. Let me know in the comments if you disagree with some points or if you have further ideas how to overcome the desperate and shallow current architectural situation. New Classi...
Modern Architecture: Le Corbusier: Why the “5 Points of a New Architecture” are SCAM
มุมมอง 2.4K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
Le Corbusier was a great architect. Nevertheless he produced quite some nonsense - in this video I "debunk" his "5 Points of a New Architecture”. Forgive me the word "debunk" and also that I might get angry about that topic in some times. If you are a good human, subscribe me!! If you are a bad human, do whatever you want. I am Sebastian - a German Architect and University Lecturer. #architectu...
Why Modern Architecture is SCAM
มุมมอง 9K10 หลายเดือนก่อน
I get really angry on this topic - forgive me when I am upset: I point out the obvious errors of “modern” and contemporary architecture I am Sebastian - a German Architect and University Lecturer. Subscribe me please! :) Let me know in the comments if you have wishes for topics of new videos ! #architecture #modernarchitecture #bauhaus
Modern Architecture VS. Postmodern: Mindset, and what it means for today [University Lecture]
มุมมอง 2.1K11 หลายเดือนก่อน
In this video I talk about the biggest Contradiction in Culture and Architecture: Modern Architecture vs. Postmodern Architecture. I explain the mindset and self-understanding behind both cultural movements and its impact on today. Let me know in the comments the topics of videos you wish to see new videos about. Thank you! I am Sebastian - a German Architect and University Lecturer #architectu...
Political Correctness vs. the Conservatives: Why we think what we think [Psychology of Politics]
มุมมอง 254ปีที่แล้ว
Left or right? Radical or center? In this video I explain the reasons behind Political Views - they are all rooted in our childhood Enjoy! ;) and subscribe me please! :- )
Why the 3 Classical Orders are SCAM (Architecture History / Architectural Theory) MUST WATCH
มุมมอง 1.7Kปีที่แล้ว
In this Video I give a New View on the 3 Classical Architecture Orders (Doric, Ionic, Corinthian) and why they are not what you think Subscibe me, please! : ) I am Sebastian von Thaden - a German Architect and University Lecturer #architecture #history #classic The book I talk about is this one: Robert Chitham: The Classical Orders of Architecture
Classicism & Classical Architecture in 21st Century: Does it work?
มุมมอง 6Kปีที่แล้ว
Many people are asking the question if we can and should build in Classical Architecture Style in 21st Century. In this video I discuss that question and show different examples of contemporary Classical Architecture. Sebastian von Thaden - German Architect and University Lecturer #classical #architecture #classic
Dr. Jordan Peterson: Great Cognition: The Law of Inequality [IN DEFENCE OF THE ELITE]
มุมมอง 936ปีที่แล้ว
In this Video I share the "Law of Inequality", recently published by. Dr. Jordan Peterson in his "Conservative Manifesto". I explain the relations to art and economics. #jordanpeterson #jordanbpeterson #drjordanpeterson Sources: docs.google.com/document/d/1dTyV6UlzzC_uZrPFr-3JCa1D7TAzQ_kbal76Msskrek/edit www.amazon.com/Defense-Capitalism-Rainer-Zitelmann/dp/164572073X
Classical Architecture Design Tutorial: How to actually do it. Part I: Finding the right Proportion
มุมมอง 7Kปีที่แล้ว
In this video I will show how to find the right Proportion in Classical Architecture [University Lecture] #classical #architecture #tutorial I am Sebastian - a German Architect and University Lecturer. Subscribe me, please, that gives me a good feeling :- ) The books that I mention: * Robert Chitham: The Classical Orders of Architecture: amzn.to/3z9aebJ * Jean-Nicolas-Louis Durand: Précis Des L...
Architecture History: All Architectural Styles & Epoches, Complete Overview [University Lecture]
มุมมอง 78K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Architecture History: All Architectural Styles & Epoches, Complete Overview [University Lecture]
CLASSICISTIC ARCHITECTURE Explained: Why is it so great? Analyzing Existing Classical Buildings
มุมมอง 7K2 ปีที่แล้ว
CLASSICISTIC ARCHITECTURE Explained: Why is it so great? Analyzing Existing Classical Buildings
Putin’s Palace - a Review (Architecture Design Review)
มุมมอง 1.6K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Putin’s Palace - a Review (Architecture Design Review)
CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE design principals: analyzing existing classic & classicistic buildings Part I
มุมมอง 10K2 ปีที่แล้ว
CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE design principals: analyzing existing classic & classicistic buildings Part I
Rent a Room in Bangkok CHEAP (Travel to Thailand / Rent monthly / for a month)
มุมมอง 2.4K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Rent a Room in Bangkok CHEAP (Travel to Thailand / Rent monthly / for a month)
Politik in Deutschland 2021: Links, Liberal, Konservativ? (Erklärung zu Psychologie Modellen)
มุมมอง 6473 ปีที่แล้ว
Politik in Deutschland 2021: Links, Liberal, Konservativ? (Erklärung zu Psychologie Modellen)
Psychologie: Enneagramm Subtypen / Animalische Triebe im Vergleich zu Freud (Persönlichkeits-Typen)
มุมมอง 3203 ปีที่แล้ว
Psychologie: Enneagramm Subtypen / Animalische Triebe im Vergleich zu Freud (Persönlichkeits-Typen)
Classic Architecture Design Tutorial: How to actually do it
มุมมอง 18K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Classic Architecture Design Tutorial: How to actually do it
Architecture History: Classic Greek Architecture (Hellenistic Greece Style) [University Lecture]
มุมมอง 1.4K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Architecture History: Classic Greek Architecture (Hellenistic Greece Style) [University Lecture]
Architecture History: Egypt Architecture / Egyptian Pyramids & Temples [University Online Lecture]
มุมมอง 1.4K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Architecture History: Egypt Architecture / Egyptian Pyramids & Temples [University Online Lecture]
Architecture History: Early Greek Architecture (Minoan & Troy / Troia) [University Online Lecture]
มุมมอง 7303 ปีที่แล้ว
Architecture History: Early Greek Architecture (Minoan & Troy / Troia) [University Online Lecture]
Architecture Review: The Villa Empain in Brussels / my favourite Villa / Architectural Design Revise
มุมมอง 2.9K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Architecture Review: The Villa Empain in Brussels / my favourite Villa / Architectural Design Revise
Not in 50 minutes pal
what ?
@ 12000 years of arch history in 50 mins? It’s a ridiculous statement to even make. Or Is it the Philomena Cunk version ?
See proportion in action. Click on my image on the left to take you there, more to come.
Thank you sir for this video. Very educative 👏
I appreciate the effort put into covering various architectural styles throughout history. However, I feel that the architecture of the 1900s and onward may not have been represented with full fairness. While I agree with some of the critiques presented, it seems like the period was reduced to its worst examples, especially when discussing contemporary architecture. There are far more styles and nuances at play than just the two mentioned. Given the scale and diversity of buildings being constructed today, this era is arguably one of the most expansive periods in architectural history. I understand there was limited time, but while other styles were given several slides, this broad and evolving period was only briefly showcased. A more in-depth look could really highlight the richness and diversity of modern and contemporary architecture. It’s fair to critique and showcase the shortcomings in modern architecture, but it’s important to remember that not all contemporary buildings are either soulless or composed of baseless forms. There is a wealth of thoughtful, innovative, and meaningful design happening today that deserves recognition. By highlighting only the negatives, we risk overlooking the creativity, context-driven design, and evolving styles that define much of today’s architecture.
Thank you Sebastian. I live in Switzerland and it's impossible to find an architectural firm interested in classical projects. If you know of any please post. Thanks again and well done
The introduction was justifying your stance. I don't think anyone is opposing you. You can just jump right in and we are all ready to hear.
overwhelmed by strong feelings of gibble rn 😍😍😍😍😍
Nice ;)
now beautiful Architecture scientifically proven is the best.
Yesssssss! :-)
It's telling that all the people who fetishize "classical" architecture usually don't show much in the way of typical building of the 19th and 18th century. I don't think I've ever seen somebody talk about how "beautiful" old buildings are, while showing photos of two-up two-down terraced housing in Manchester or London. They never mention the lack of indoor plumbing, the abysmal heating, ventilation, etc. People who fetishize old buildings look at exemplary examples from the past, but only look at the worst examples from modern building, and they usually have a very shallow and pretentious understanding of what they're looking at. Your video basically falls into the same old trap. It's just not a serious argument.
No, I disagree. Plain, mediocre arch from 18th / 19th century was good already. "lack of indoor plumbing, the abysmal heating, ventilation, etc" are funtional matters and have nothing to do with the design
@@SebastianvonThaden A lazy and dishonest argument.
Bauhaus is actually great
Yai! :- )
I live in Leipzig and most newly-built apartment blocks are typically grey. They all look like prisons and institutes compared to their classically-designed neighbours and yet people will pay exorbitant amounts to live in these drab and bland monstrosities (ooh ... modern amenities!). Anyone who would tell you they find these structures attractive is lying. My counter: by that rationale, you must prefer visiting Mannheim (industrial) to Heidelberg (beautiful)? Cognitive dissonances turns too many people into blabbering apologists for the crass legacy of Bauhaus and that defacer of the good, Le Corbusier. Much of the 20th century was a time or rampant artistic egos in both the arts and architecture. And they are still building soulless boxes. Awful... You are preaching to the choir with this video.
Thank you !
Great points
It’s stupid to present excuses fir the fact that that totalitarian regimes built in an classical style It’s the art deco style that was en vogue everywhere at that time The Beetle is not nazi though it was designed during the nazi time !
Looks like the windows/doors had to be compromised, maybe due to availability or security reasons. I bet there aren't many options if you want the highest possible security.
How about the architectures in Asia, Asia Minor, and other parts of the world?
this is discussed in another comment here already
@Sebastian, Have you ever heard of Christopher Alexander? (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Alexander) You might enjoy his books like "Notes on the Synthesis of Form", "A Pattern Language", and "The Timeless Way of Building". Those books address many of the issues you raise in this video.
So.. you don't like anything built after the 1915's ?.....
Oh, there are many great buldings of all times, even nowadays!
going back is a great story ! it's ideology in my opinion when people say we can't go back, we can do what we want, we are supposed to be "sustainable" old buildings can last hundreds of years that is sustainable! and people prefer to look at old buildings so it's social, as you mention it does not have to have a lot of ornaments, that said there were modernists architect's and designers who believed we have to look back in history to create something new timeless and functional like the Danish architect Kaare Klint he was "the father of Scandinavian design" his father P.V Jensen Klint build Grundtvigs church in Copenhagen and he finished it after his father died it's a mix of old and modernism , Kaare Klint also designed the Bethlehem Church also in Copenhagen , he thought almost all the Danish modern designers and architects but not all of them listened to his advice and were more inspired by Bauhaus , i find the one who listened the best was Hans Wegner the furniture designer that's why his chairs and other furniture function in all interior styles because it's a mix of modern and traditional it's timeless
Why do you think golden proportions are not widely used today?
well, name me several famous examples of the past 5 years that use the golden ratio :)
If we really want to become one with ourselfes in architecture, we just need to be honest with ourselfes. And logic is not a good adviser for that. When logic rules an architects mind, we end up with comiblocks. The places where we find our perfect buildings? These places are to find in fantasy movies. - In places where we dare to be free from reality! Just look at the city of the elfes in 'The lord of the rings' ...Honestly? I feel sorry for myself that I live in times where I have to see uglyness every single day of my life only because some soulless guys descided so after the horrors of WWI.
Yes, I agree !
I feel like that too, I feel weared down by all the ugliness of modern world
Absolutely amazing ❤
Thank you !
Hello, Professor! I have posted this comment under another one of your videos a couple of weeks ago, but I'm guessing it might have gotten lost in your notifications inbox, so I am leaving it under this video as well. I'm returning to this video (originally th-cam.com/video/JHClCthMK-g/w-d-xo.htmlsi=lp1G5jQ2b7PFDrte ) with a few questions that came to mind after letting the information settle and discussing the topic of architecture with a couple of friends. I'm very curious to know if you can explain why, in Gothic cathedrals specifically, we see the walls becoming thinner and gaining support from the outside. I understand the purpose of these supports is to hold up the walls and add to the structural integrity of the building, but what was the reason for making the walls thinner? Was it perhaps to save on materials, which allowed the cathedrals to become significantly larger and more intricate in their fine details? Additionally, I'm very curious if you can explain the difference between Art Nouveau and the Secessionist Style. I've noticed several differences myself, such as Art Nouveau having a much smoother "flow," so to speak, in the overall shape of structures built with that design, as well as being adorned with more organic ornaments, such as an abundance of flowers, leaves, and sculptures of faces integrated into columns, walls, and architraves. In contrast, the Secessionist Style, especially the one often seen in Hungary and the western part of Romania, seems far bulkier, more geometric, and more sparing with ornamentation on the facades. I believe both styles aimed to create something new and to break away from traditional proportions and the classical orders for columns. While they have stark differences, they also share certain common points. I wonder if you could expand more on the differences and similarities between these two styles. I often find myself guessing whether a building is in one style or the other, only to later realize I was mistaken after looking it up online. One last question: Is the reason the Romanesque style is often seen as a "failed" attempt to emulate the classical Roman style due to the setbacks caused by the Dark Ages, resulting in the loss of knowledge required to build in that particular style? I hope these aren't too many questions at once or that they're overwhelming to take in and respond to. Please take your time answering if you see this and intend to! Thank you so much in advance.
Great video; and in fact, one could maybe say that the integration of form and function is so thorough that form IS function, which would mean that beauty is in service of both aesthetic and practical ends.
I like that thought.. !
I had a little cold when I recorded it. I apologize for my voice.. !
But I didn't want to wait ;)
Interesting! Would you also teach Baroque Architecture or more Classicism?
It is more focused on the basic rules of Classical Architecture, which are also the underlying rules of Baroque Architecture.
Where can I apply?
@@JonathanQuerenbrom On the website of the Academy for Classical Architecture: www.classical-architecture.org
Great, I will send you a message there!
@@JonathanQuerenbrom Great, cool!
Aristocrat style. How to design classical architecture for middle-class people?
That will be also taught. That works in the same principles.
Great video - I especially agree that modern architecture is awful, soul crushing and drab. It really points out how great and beautiful the architecture in the past was. I have a question/request - I'm curious how all of those amazing buildings were built specifically in the Americas. The history seems to point out that all of these brand new settlements in the late 1800s were able to build massive, beautiful buildings in roughly a year's timespan. I imagine one of two things could have made this possible: The records are incomplete - and only mention the completion date - these works of art would take years or decades to produce from skilled craftsmen - or there was a huge industry in the Early Americas that allowed for rapid installation of these great works of art. What happened to those industries? Where did the massive stone / cast iron / statue-carving industries go? A lot of these towns say that they had a population of less than 15,000 at the time the buildings were completed, and they list completion in a year. Do we have any better records of actual construction? Thanks for your video and your time!
I am not American; but it sounds interesting what you say. can you list some names of those American 1800s towns?
@@SebastianvonThaden Wow thanks for your quick reply! A couple of towns to look at: Sioux City, Iowa Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Superior, Wisconsin and especially the cities out West - as I imagine the transportation of goods was even more difficult like: Spokane, Washington Walla Walla, Washington Salt Lake City, Utah (The Tabernacle is incredible for 3-4 years work!) San Diego, California It seems like they must have had an extensive network to be able to move the building materials for all of the grand constructions in the area. Especially looking at State buildings, Churches, Schools, and especially the Asylums. Thanks for digging in!
Google "KTH School of Architecture Stockholm's ugliest building".
This transates to Music too.: which music has more transcendence and timeess duration, Mozart/Beethoven or Schoenberg/Messiaen ?
There are some good contemporary Classical Music pieces; but those are overall tonal. I recommend Gorecki's 3rd Symphony.
you keep saying that Le Corbusier was a great and remarkable architect.. but why? despite the fact he was good in selling his work you didn't really pointed out any bright sides of his work as an architect.. and I honestly can't see them yeah there are a few ideas in the monestry i might also call remarkable though definitly not asthetic or beautiful! I think this why I can not get the point. Houses are made for humans. Le corbusiers buildings are representing big ego without touching my heart in the aspect of beauty..
haha the church in the end i liked most xD
well, there are criteria why I think Le Corbusier was a great architect. I might do another video explaining why..
Hello, Professor! I'm returning to this video with a few questions that came to mind after letting the information settle and discussing the topic of architecture with a couple of friends. I'm very curious to know if you can explain why, in Gothic cathedrals specifically, we see the walls becoming thinner and gaining support from the outside. I understand the purpose of these supports is to hold up the walls and add to the structural integrity of the building, but what was the reason for making the walls thinner? Was it perhaps to save on materials, which allowed the cathedrals to become significantly larger and more intricate in their fine details? Additionally, I'm very curious if you can explain the difference between Art Nouveau and the Secessionist Style. I've noticed several differences myself, such as Art Nouveau having a much smoother "flow," so to speak, in the overall shape of structures built with that design, as well as being adorned with more organic ornaments, such as an abundance of flowers, leaves, and sculptures of faces integrated into columns, walls, and architraves. In contrast, the Secessionist Style, especially the one often seen in Hungary and the western part of Romania, seems far bulkier, more geometric, and more sparing with ornamentation on the facades. I believe both styles aimed to create something new and to break away from traditional proportions and the classical orders for columns. While they have stark differences, they also share certain common points. I wonder if you could expand more on the differences and similarities between these two styles. I often find myself guessing whether a building is in one style or the other, only to later realize I was mistaken after looking it up online. One last question: Is the reason the Romanesque style is often seen as a "failed" attempt to emulate the classical Roman style due to the setbacks caused by the Dark Ages, resulting in the loss of knowledge required to build in that particular style? I hope these aren't too many questions at once or that they're overwhelming to take in and respond to. Please take your time answering if you see this and intend to! Thank you so much in advance.
thank you! to 1.): no, I guess it is really just the aestetics, the aim to dissolve the wall into colourful light 2.) you think too much in "styles". These were just 2 different attempts. Art Nouveau was inspirired by Japanese paintings, Secessionism, I guess, more by geometric ornament from egypt or greece 3.): I guess, yes, and building technology
I'm an architect, and I think we should carefully study why classical buildings were pleasing for human beings. We can and should use the scale, proportions, rhythm, massing, and the spacing of the classical style for buildings of public importance since the ideas behind these systems of design were human based and intrinsically known to be pleasing for humans. We should use an architectural system or systems that already works (have been tested and proven to be effective), without getting into all the nitty gritty of the details.
Yes, that is, basically, what I am saying :)
This is so cool! We really need to get this kind of architecture back! We need more beauty in this world. I was considering studying architecture but im not into 3d art nor am I good at working with computers, are those necessary?
Hi I'm an architecture student, in architecture school you will learn to draw in 3d and it's also mandatory to learn computer program becuase most architects use revit and Rhino, they use Rhino for creating the architecture model and revit for the floor plans. You will learn with practice and time, it's not that hard. The beginning is hard but not really.
@@javierpacheco8234 Thankyou 😊
@@Anyaunh-sb7nm you're welcome hope this helps.
Very interesting details. Some ideas reveal to be weird and absurd only when seen from the future.
yes, right.. !
Very nice
Thank you! :- )
Fantastischer Vortrag! Ich bin bestimmt nicht der einzige, der sich über Quellen und andere Verweise freuen würde. Danke für ihre Arbeit
vielleicht mache ich mir irgendwann die Arbeit und poste die :)
Wonderful video. Thank you. Sorry if it was mentioned in the video and I missed it, but did you talk about neoclassicism or was it omitted? How come it didn’t have a separate category? Is there nothing much to talk about?
I talk about the classicism after baroque / roccoco
Hello professor, thank you for sharing all of your knowledge with us! I'm a 21 year old student in psychology, but all forms of art have always piqued my interested, and recently I've taken a very big liking to better understanding architecture, its styles, the motifs, how different styles emerged and so on and so forth. I am now watching your courses in which you go in depth in explaining them, such as the Classical architecture course, the Greek course and the 50 minute long one in which you briefly cover all the main styles. Your manner of explaining things is very nice, easy to understand, and I am very happy to be learning about these things. Sending lots of love and appreciation from Romania!
thank you for the compliments! if you have questions, you can post them under the videos
Really good dissection of the topic with great case studies provided as photos plus explanations along the way. Will look into your further videos! Thanks!
Great, thank you !
This is definitely an underrated channel. Modernism is an ideology and a way of thinking and of life, just beyond some certain forms of deconstruction in architecture. If you really think in a modernism way you'll see how justified it is to unite classical beauty and order with modern designs. Also, the durability of classic buildings is so ignored in many ways. BTW I love your design! It reminds me of some architecture works in China( "Capital Theatre Beijing" for example). Please share more of your ideas!
Yes, I will, Thank you ! feel free to share my video!
could you also comment on their floor plans and sections so we can better understand their functionality? as an aspiring new modern architect i often think our hardest challenge isn't necessarily applying the classical orders and principals to the façades, but rather making the interiors and modern construction techniques work within the classical language
Yes, I might show some floor plans in future videos!
thanks a lot!
Thank you for sharing these. Wonderful! How about colors, since now we understand how colorful Classical art and architecture were? An architect I know did his house with Roman style features. The main room had great columns and a high coffered ceiling. I especially remember how he painted the florets in each vault with many colors, and all parts of the house interior had distinctive colors, perhaps far subtler than the Romans would have done.
For interior I am also a fan of colours. Do you remember the name of the architect ?
Thank u so much!!!! I just started watching. But the images are difficult to read. Do you have a link to the slides or images, or can you send me pleeease?
Ohh you zoomed in!!! Thats why im impatient and anxious lol I am applying to arch uni this year and would be useful and a bless this material to study. I will continue the vídeo and take somee notes, thank youuuu
Was er hinterlassen hat, sind katastrophale städtebauliche Ideen, sind Gebäude, die zu großen Teilen nicht bewohnbar waren, weil er die Menschen zwingen wollte sich seinen Ideen unterzuordnen. Er war Faschist im Herzen und im Handeln. Er hat Gebäude entwickelt, nur um sich abzuheben von anderen Architekten und zu zelebrieren, was technisch möglich war. Das ganze hat er mit Schriften untermauert, die keiner kritischen Betrachtung standhalten. Ein Architekt mit Allmachtsphantasien, ein begnadeter Selbstdarsteller und cleverer Selbstvermarkter. Die Folgen seiner Visionen machen einen Großteil der gebauten Dystopie aus in der wir heute leben. Corbusier war kein guter Architekt.
jean Etienne who ? please, i don't found the family name of this architecte
boullee :)
Allreddy cavemen 10s of thousants of years ago made walldrawings to embellish their caves , they needed beauty . But ofcourse , we modern men know better ........😮
As a Dutchman I am verry proud you showed Berlage and de Amsterdam School with Michel de Klerk .....oh and also Dudok !
Thank you ; )
I think the "weird" and "crazy" buildings still add something to cities, other than the always same bleak, grey boxes. See websites like "Ugly Belgian Houses" or Turit Fröbe's "teardown calendars" for architectural sins. These buildings may be ugly and misfits, but they offer something for the eye, instead of just being eyesores. There just shouldn't be too much of these. For an ordinary family home, tenement or office building, it is mostly better to fit in.
Wow!! you are using Archicad! I recently made a project with an eclectic facade (that was my contract ). The Archicad isn't a popular BIM software in EEUU. Congratulations on the video!! The proportion is a very important subject in architecture!
thank you ! what is popular in EEUU?