Putin’s Palace - a Review (Architecture Design Review)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @Stefanism
    @Stefanism 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The building at 1:10 is not in Russia, but in the capital of Northern Macedonia and the second is in Poland.

    • @SebastianvonThaden
      @SebastianvonThaden  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ok. Those examples of "kitsch" came out of a quick Google search :) I just wanted to show "wrong" classical arch.

  • @drgyt2469
    @drgyt2469 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Maybe a glass roof over the porch (/portical) could add some functionality.

  • @vrilatorepsilon9931
    @vrilatorepsilon9931 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks like the windows/doors had to be compromised, maybe due to availability or security reasons. I bet there aren't many options if you want the highest possible security.

  • @sonjak8265
    @sonjak8265 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why should the windows be to the floor --on a building located in a southern, seaside place? There, the sun is blasting for most of the day during five months a year.

    • @SebastianvonThaden
      @SebastianvonThaden  ปีที่แล้ว

      in terms of design it should. and I presumed the building features an aircon ;)

    • @sonjak8265
      @sonjak8265 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@SebastianvonThaden In terms of modernist design, perhaps, but not in terms of centuries old traditional design.

    • @SebastianvonThaden
      @SebastianvonThaden  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sonjak8265 I don't remember in which timestamp I said that, but especially in classic designs it looks more generous, if the windows at least follow classic
      window proportions

    • @lolrotfl2587
      @lolrotfl2587 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Architekt ma zeza, więc nie dziwcie sie że są pewne zaburzenia w proporcjach 😂

  • @matthewt7300
    @matthewt7300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review. I think the word you were thinking about was entablature

    • @SebastianvonThaden
      @SebastianvonThaden  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, you are right. It came to my mind after I finished the video : )

  • @alaahamza62
    @alaahamza62 ปีที่แล้ว

    The first thing I noticed on the Cornish when it cross together was what I had been wondering if you'd notice, and you did, heheh. It really looks horrible, and the building's base is also so ugly. It gives me the impression of those extravagant Arabian Gulf villas when they build with an overwhelming classical design with no sense of proportion... very messy. I wonder how an Italian architect could do this

  • @Spartan_Disiplin
    @Spartan_Disiplin ปีที่แล้ว

    1:47 I dont know man,It looks like a impressive 19th century building.
    You also criticized adding something from every movement, but this is why eclectic style exists

    • @smoath
      @smoath ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure, but some of the aesthetics are very bad. I know criticism can seem arrogant but it's good for education and improvement.

  • @scholtysikmichal4478
    @scholtysikmichal4478 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your second example is from Poland: de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liche%C5%84_Stary

    • @SebastianvonThaden
      @SebastianvonThaden  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok, maybe. But that doesn't make the architecture better. ; )