- 38
- 117 591
Law Simply Explained
United States
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 10 ธ.ค. 2014
Thanks for visiting my channel! My goal here is to make legal concepts understandable through videos that present material in an entertaining and accessible style. I have taught a wide range of law school subjects over the years, including Constitutional Law, Contracts, Commercial Paper (or Negotiable Instruments), Criminal Law, First Amendment, Professional Responsibility, and Sales. I enjoy teaching - working with students inside and outside the classroom - and hope that comes through in my videos.
Godspeed to you in your legal studies and law practice.
Godspeed to you in your legal studies and law practice.
Introduction to Remedies | Contracts | Remedies
This lesson gives an overview of the remedies available for breach of contract and then focuses in on expectation damages. I hope you find it helpful. Thanks for your support.
Chapters
00:00:00 - Introduction
00:00:37 - Theories of Recovery
00:06:00 - Painter/Owner Example
00:08:00 - (1) Expectation Interest
00:17:01 - (2) Reliance Interest
00:21:02 - (3) Restitution Interest
00:25:02 - A Closer Look at Expectation Interest
00:25:52 - (1) Specific Performance
00:33:19 - (2) Money Damages
00:58:31 - Limits on Expectation Damages
01:01:11 - Conclusion/Outro
Chapters
00:00:00 - Introduction
00:00:37 - Theories of Recovery
00:06:00 - Painter/Owner Example
00:08:00 - (1) Expectation Interest
00:17:01 - (2) Reliance Interest
00:21:02 - (3) Restitution Interest
00:25:02 - A Closer Look at Expectation Interest
00:25:52 - (1) Specific Performance
00:33:19 - (2) Money Damages
00:58:31 - Limits on Expectation Damages
01:01:11 - Conclusion/Outro
มุมมอง: 5 806
วีดีโอ
Anticipatory Repudiation | Contracts | Breach and Repudiation
มุมมอง 3.4Kปีที่แล้ว
This lesson continues our coverage of breach of contract with a look at anticipatory repudiation. The issue of repudiation arises when, before the date of performance, a party indicates through their words or conduct that they don't intend to perform. Chapters 00:00 - Introduction 01:12 - Consider an example 04:01 - Option (1) Wait and see approach 08:48 - Option (2) Treat as anticipatory repud...
Conditions | Contracts | Breach & Repudiation
มุมมอง 2.9Kปีที่แล้ว
This lesson considers how conditions may be used to structure contracts and order performance. We'll see that sometimes the parties themselves insert conditions into their contract, which we call express conditions. And sometimes the law inserts conditions into the parties' contract, which we call constructive or implied conditions. Chapter 00:00:00 - Introduction 00:01:40 - (1) Express Conditi...
Three Types of Breaches | Contracts | Breach and Repudiation
มุมมอง 6Kปีที่แล้ว
In this lesson, we take a look at breach of contract. Once we've established what the terms of the contract are and what those terms mean, we know what the duties of the parties are and can determine whether or not the parties have properly discharged those duties. We'll see that there are three three types of breaches-partial, material, and total-and how they relate to one another. Chapters 00...
Parol Evidence Rule | Contracts | Terms and Meaning
มุมมอง 6Kปีที่แล้ว
We have finished with defenses and excuses. However, before we move on to breach, we need to make sure we've nailed down the terms of the contract and the meaning of those terms. After all, we can't determine whether a party has breached unless we know exactly what the promised to do in the first place. This lesson covers the parol evidence rule. The rule addresses situations where the parties ...
Changed Circumstances | Contracts | Defenses & Excuses
มุมมอง 1.3Kปีที่แล้ว
In this lesson, we move from our coverage of the defenses to formation to considering the changed circumstances defenses. There are three changed circumstances defenses. Each is based on the rationale that some event has occurred after contract formation that makes performance so problematic that the party should be excused from having to perform. Chapters 00:00 - Introduction 01:21 - Three Exc...
Mistake | Contracts | Defenses & Excuses
มุมมอง 3.2Kปีที่แล้ว
In this lesson, we continue our march through the defenses to formation with a look at mistake. The defense of mistake applies when one or both of the parties to a contract believe something contrary to fact that goes to a basic assumption of the contract and has a material effect on the parties' agreed upon performances. Chapters 00:00 - Introduction 00:31 - Learning Objectives 02:13 - Mutual ...
Public Policy and Illegality | Contracts | Defenses and Excuses
มุมมอง 1.8Kปีที่แล้ว
This video adds another defense to our growing list of defenses to contract formation. The claim that the subject matter or terms of a contract violate the law or run afoul of established public policy can sometimes serve as a defense. We'll see that there are some clear cut cases but also doubtful ones where we need to balance the policies for and against enforcing the contract. Chapter 00:00 ...
Unconscionability | Contracts | Defenses & Excuses
มุมมอง 3.4Kปีที่แล้ว
We add another defense to our roster of defenses to formation. This time, we cover unconscionability. The defense applies when a one-sided bargaining process leads the victim to agree to a contract with oppressive terms. Chapters 00:00 - Introduction 00:23 - Overview 02:13 - Policy 06:55 - At Formation 09:46 - Procedural Unconscionability 17:11 - Substantive Unconscionability 20:43 - Remedies 2...
Misrepresentation and Nondisclosure | Contracts | Defenses & Excuses
มุมมอง 2.9Kปีที่แล้ว
This lesson continues our coverage of the contract defenses and excuses with a look at misrepresentation and nondisclosure. Two defenses intended to protect individuals who were induced to assent to a contract by being misled as to the actual facts surrounding the transaction. Chapters 00:00 - Introduction 00:24 - (1) Misrepresentation 10:32 - (a) Element One: Statement of "fact" before the con...
Duress and Undue Influence | Contracts | Defenses and Excuses
มุมมอง 7Kปีที่แล้ว
This video continues our coverage of the defenses to contract formation with a look at duress and undue influence. Although these defenses are distinct, each having their own elements, they share a common concern about voluntariness. A legally effective acceptance should be voluntary. If someone assents to a deal because of improper threats or excessive persuasion, then their acceptance likely ...
How to Use the Flashcards | Contracts | The More You Know
มุมมอง 423ปีที่แล้ว
Quick video explaining how to use the flashcards that I post with my Contracts videos.
Lack of Capacity | Contracts | Defenses and Excuses
มุมมอง 1.6Kปีที่แล้ว
This lesson covers our second defense to formation: lack of capacity. Our first was the Statute of Frauds, which requires a claimant to have proof other than just testimony that a contract exists before the claimant gets her day in court. A defendant lacks the capacity to contract if she is (1) a minor/infant, (2) mentally incompetent, or (3) intoxicated. If so, then she has the right to disaff...
Statute of Frauds | Contracts | Defenses to Formation
มุมมอง 6Kปีที่แล้ว
This lesson covers the statute of frauds. Generally a contract does not have to be in writing to be legally enforceable. However, the statute of frauds requires that six categories of contracts (helpfully remembered by the acronym MYLEGS) must be in writing to be enforceable. We follow a 3-step analysis: (1) Does the contract in question fall within one of the six categories covered by the stat...
Warranties and Conversion | Negotiable Instruments
มุมมอง 598ปีที่แล้ว
This lesson covers warranties and conversion. Articles 3 and 4 provide a number of legal theories for liability. So far our focus has largely been on the liability of those who sign an instrument. We added wrongful dishonor to our repertoire last lesson. With warranties and conversion, we are getting an even more complete picture. They address situations where the losses at issue are rooted not...
Properly Payable and Wrongful Dishonor | Negotiable Instruments
มุมมอง 795ปีที่แล้ว
Properly Payable and Wrongful Dishonor | Negotiable Instruments
Accommodation Parties | Liability on the Instrument | Negotiable Instruments
มุมมอง 982ปีที่แล้ว
Accommodation Parties | Liability on the Instrument | Negotiable Instruments
You Sign, You Pay | Liability on the Instrument | Negotiable Instruments
มุมมอง 1.3Kปีที่แล้ว
You Sign, You Pay | Liability on the Instrument | Negotiable Instruments
The Underlying Transaction | Liability on the Instrument | Negotiable Instruments
มุมมอง 670ปีที่แล้ว
The Underlying Transaction | Liability on the Instrument | Negotiable Instruments
Rights of a Holder in Due Course | Negotiable Instruments
มุมมอง 2.2Kปีที่แล้ว
Rights of a Holder in Due Course | Negotiable Instruments
Acquiring Holder in Due Course Status | Negotiable Instruments
มุมมอง 2.5Kปีที่แล้ว
Acquiring Holder in Due Course Status | Negotiable Instruments
Negotiation and Being a Holder | Negotiable Instruments
มุมมอง 2.7Kปีที่แล้ว
Negotiation and Being a Holder | Negotiable Instruments
Intro and Requirements for Negotiability | Negotiable Instruments
มุมมอง 1.9Kปีที่แล้ว
Intro and Requirements for Negotiability | Negotiable Instruments
Battle of the Forms | Contract Law | Elements of Formation
มุมมอง 6K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Battle of the Forms | Contract Law | Elements of Formation
Irrevocable Offers | Contract Law | Elements of Formation
มุมมอง 1.7K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Irrevocable Offers | Contract Law | Elements of Formation
Acceptance and Other Responses to Offers | Contracts | Elements of Formation
มุมมอง 1.5K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Acceptance and Other Responses to Offers | Contracts | Elements of Formation
Offers | Contract Formation | Elements of a Contract
มุมมอง 1.7K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Offers | Contract Formation | Elements of a Contract
Mutual Assent | Contract Law | Formation
มุมมอง 3.1K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Mutual Assent | Contract Law | Formation
Restitution | Contract Law | Consideration Substitutes
มุมมอง 4.2K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Restitution | Contract Law | Consideration Substitutes
Promissory Estoppel | Contract Law | Consideration Subsitutes
มุมมอง 13K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Promissory Estoppel | Contract Law | Consideration Subsitutes
I am. A1L and I’m getting ready for my finals for contracts and torts this information is excellent!
Good morning sr give me job samoa I wark mantinci electric
These videos are better than anything my prof has taught in this entire semester.
You are a legend
Is this for 8 years old kids? Wtf
The best explanation of the statute of frauds and exceptions. Thank you. If I can add one very minor bit of feedback on your examples using the names Bob, Barb, Bo...confusing, sound too much alike, especially when listening to audio only in the car. How about Barb as the buyer, Sam as the seller, for example, less confusing.
Great breakdown the teaching is A1
Please never upload music behind a lecture again I wanted to kill myself ❤
You the best
Very good!
Are you for real? Sell money? Government declared bankrupcy in 1933. There is no money. Only credits that are transfered.
Excellent!!
so so helpful in explaining the mental incapacity special rule. thanks!
Changed circumstances, iv never thought of these " excuses " . Thank you
Mediation agreements ? Have you knocked out one of these videos yet ? What obligation or duty does thev3rd party owe the negotiating parties?
Too good
Saved my grades lol
I love you Professor
I would think the cruise example would not be a repudiation because the year long timeframe was not confirmed between them & there was still time available for them to either cancel the employment agreement or somehow return from the cruise on time for the start date. The employee was obviously going to claim an injury on the cruise ship... and return home just in time 🤣 your video was great and really informative!!!
This is still paying by someone, where all this arguing is simply insanity and just another way cops can beat people up...revenue collectors and judges writing construction contracts for gvt agencies. While you stay in jail, for signing licenses, when not even on any military base.Nothing is to be signed from independent people, unless, on fed registry, forms are under 13132. Must be in compliance to constitutionally protected rights !!!! Who authorized all of this ? The people don't even know about this stuff out here.
Extremely helpful and useful video! Excellent content 👏👏👏👏👏 thank you!
You can't imagine how helpful this is!!! Thank you!
Thanks!
Thank you for this video and your in-depth and most logical and fundamental explanations of concepts in contract law. It all really makes sense! With respect from the Old Country where Common law originates.
Reliance damages are less than expectation damages. Promissory restoration
What application is made for registration of a private vehicle, is Secretary of State required to inform applicants that when registration is perfected the private vehicle is classified as a motor vehicle?
Ive watched numerous videos of yours and my brain literally hurts
Best Video talking about remedies in Contract
❤
Very helpful
Thank you, something not taught in public schools.
Thank you for helping me out. So helpful and simple to understand 🫶✊
Damn dude, these videos are incredibly helpful. I'm in the middle of a Pro Se with a brother/trustee who created a fraudulent contract with me for a buyout and was tricked to sign while under the influence. However, the contract was signed 10yrs ago and did not become aware of the damage until two years ago when he finally decided to give me a copy of the contract. I wish I could afford an attorney to rip this guy apart but sadly I am on SSDI and have had to self repesent myself and learn and learn and keep learning so much that now I'm on contracts. I'm really surprised you dont have any comments? Wow! Such valuable information. I find it fascinating. Thanks.
Thank you for these, Professor Tracey. They are very helpful!
Your videos are a lifesaver!
Are all anticipatory breaches repudiatory?
I really appreciate these lectures. Thank you!
Ok, disregard. I think I get it. It’s a merchant’s confirmatory memo and that’s why it’s sufficient. And now I really want some chocolates. 😁
I’m confused. At the 38:00 mark you’re talking about Sale of Goods and whether the writing is sufficient against the sender. Bob is the sender (of chocolates, right?). You said “if Barb was the defendant her writing confirming the transaction would be sufficient.” But she’s not the defendant, she’s the plaintiff in your example. Bob never signed. So how will Barb prevail?
I don’t see a link in the video description. Am I missing something?
Thank you for your videos! You are helping this 54 yr old woman get through year one of law school. You are very good at explaining the concepts. So many other videos try to sum it all up in 10 minutes. That’s too short. I’m an audio learner so your teaching helps so much in grasping these legal concepts. Keep up the great work!😊
Excellent lecture! Really appreciate how you break things down and illustrate each concept with worked examples. An hour well spent learning from this video (which I have bookmarked). Appreciation from the Old Country (UK)! The only thing that we don't have here is the UCC.
Love it, Thank you!!!
Creating the perfect environment for improper threats to be used against people and take advantage of human being for denigration humiliation retaliation abuse harassment assault battery disposal of private property and loss of life
Yeah none of these bad cops are my concern so none can come over and talk or take anything that is mine! I know the laws and I will not be pushed into a corner by their retaliation!! Fake cops!
It’s all been for fraud I’m not that friendly I don’t consent to searches I did not consent to anything timeshare properties or Identity useage in anyway shape or form !!
very helpful! thank you!
Can you please qualify money?
Thank you for your presentation s. The best I have found
you used the car wash example under your procedural explanation, but wouldn't the title to the car be substantive?
I think the reason that is procedural is because it has to do with the fact that barb clearly didn't have time to read the long contract and bob was aware of this, rather than the terms of the contract itself