2:30 the loan-contract between bob and the bank does not have proper legal consideration because the $10k that the bank is loaning, only $1000 comes from the banks reserves. the other $9000 is money that is loaned into existence from nothing that did not exist BEFORE and AT the signing of the contract. (pre-underwriting makes it look like it does exist before the note is signed but that money would go back into nothing if the loan-contract is not signed). The loan-contractual "consideration" that the bank is providing is $1000 + the false "right to violate double entry accounting to create $9000 that never was the banks money". This is found in the Chicago Fed's Modern Money Mechanics, page 6 if i remember correctly. There isn't a single mortgage or loan in America where the bank actually has full required contractual consideration equaled by the buyer. Not a single mortgage is a valid legal contract. Go see the Credit River case and the odd circumstances of the death of the judge and finally the overturning of the case. We almost had the banksters.
"Everything legal is a fiction". attorneys have also told me that "because it's a fiction, it's all 100% optional." How do we enforce the optional nature of all things fictional when courts and the gov't enforce the optional legal fiction as mandatory with unlawful color of law violence? Courts and cases are "constructive trusts"... how does trust law apply to all court cases?
This is still paying by someone, where all this arguing is simply insanity and just another way cops can beat people up...revenue collectors and judges writing construction contracts for gvt agencies. While you stay in jail, for signing licenses, when not even on any military base.Nothing is to be signed from independent people, unless, on fed registry, forms are under 13132. Must be in compliance to constitutionally protected rights !!!! Who authorized all of this ? The people don't even know about this stuff out here.
Can you do a video on the UCC discharge by cancellation or renunciation?
2:30 the loan-contract between bob and the bank does not have proper legal consideration because the $10k that the bank is loaning, only $1000 comes from the banks reserves. the other $9000 is money that is loaned into existence from nothing that did not exist BEFORE and AT the signing of the contract. (pre-underwriting makes it look like it does exist before the note is signed but that money would go back into nothing if the loan-contract is not signed).
The loan-contractual "consideration" that the bank is providing is $1000 + the false "right to violate double entry accounting to create $9000 that never was the banks money". This is found in the Chicago Fed's Modern Money Mechanics, page 6 if i remember correctly. There isn't a single mortgage or loan in America where the bank actually has full required contractual consideration equaled by the buyer. Not a single mortgage is a valid legal contract. Go see the Credit River case and the odd circumstances of the death of the judge and finally the overturning of the case. We almost had the banksters.
Bro what’s your experience with this knowledge. Have you secured your rights before ? Sued a bank before ?
"Everything legal is a fiction". attorneys have also told me that "because it's a fiction, it's all 100% optional." How do we enforce the optional nature of all things fictional when courts and the gov't enforce the optional legal fiction as mandatory with unlawful color of law violence? Courts and cases are "constructive trusts"... how does trust law apply to all court cases?
HELP😭How cant we find out how they Got the note.🤓
Can you please qualify money?
do you have a contact?
This is still paying by someone, where all this arguing is simply insanity and just another way cops can beat people up...revenue collectors and judges writing construction contracts for gvt agencies. While you stay in jail, for signing licenses, when not even on any military base.Nothing is to be signed from independent people, unless, on fed registry, forms are under 13132. Must be in compliance to constitutionally protected rights !!!! Who authorized all of this ? The people don't even know about this stuff out here.