วีดีโอ

@@urielterry I’ve never used it but trusted friends of mine that have compared them say it’s not similar. Not bad just not a sta level

@ thank you

@@barrygeary1890 hey definitely can! That’s why I always clip gain down my breaths if I’m able to before heavy compression and even after

@@imremozsik1012 thanks for watching!

@@claudianreyn4529 absolutely nothing! I’ve tried it before on a mix hahah, it also has some cool subtle box tone

Thanks so much man I’m glad you enjoyed it! I did actually add timestamps I don’t know why TH-cam is refusing to have them populate on the video but they’re in the description

1. Good arrangement 2. Good sound selection/good tones when recording 3. Good performances by good musicians 4. Saturation/clipping on transient material 5. Mixbus compression + waveshaping

@@JoeyFTL if i could do all that i wouldnt have to make it loud to cover up my crappyness

@@JoeyFTLexactly! I could probably just do a video talking about that briefly lol. Also just bringing the fader up is the unspoken secret of loudness people forget about 😂

@@vektacular that’s a great way to describe it!

@@shevyjohn9308 yeah same I still use it on every mix it’s so good!

@@J.WingedLion thanks so much, it’s the avid s3!

@@huberttorzewski when less is more and it works yeah for sure! I find that doing less with more plugins that you very specifically with a specific purpose goes a long way and results in the most maximized results of a sound source. I personally love stacking multiple compressors. The attack and release times as well as the mojo added when done correctly allows you to sculpt things that otherwise wouldn’t really be achievable. Thats why I mention you kind of have to experience doing too much and over processing sounds and experience the less is more approach to land in this “more of less” approach

@@david_djent I guess I'm more CLA's mixing style advocate haha. Big, bold moves on the individual channels (if needed - most of the times the answer is yes) + only minimal processing on the mix bus. I've tried "more of less" approach 8-9 years ago for like 3 years and listening to it today I don't like how it sounded that much. I can hear all of that added muddiness from the plugins and some weird things going on in the midrange

@@huberttorzewski I guess I’d say I’m that way in the first few moves I make! I think I’m more advocating for once you make those big bold moves, not being afraid to squeeze that last 5% out of a really quality sound source even if it take a bunch of super tiny moves

@@david_djent ahh ok sure, I agree!

@@Mike_Benz_ thanks for watching!!

@@onecrunch5308 many thank

@@RobinZV1 yeah I feel like everyone has to experience that death spiral before they learn to leverage their tools to the max

(Sausage Fattner x10)

@@alastairwain aawww yeah you get it!! 😂😂

@@tatepaul3947 a band doesn’t currently exist yet! The artist who’s the vocalist is gonna drop it

@@konradhoroszko255 you’re welcome!

@@tatepaul3947 thanks man I’m really glad you enjoyed it! Yeah the whole bass thing was paradigm shift for me when I first tried it

Also, “booty cheese” 😂😂

@@RobinZV1 it’s just a regular part of my vernacular for whatever reason 😂💀

@@Radio-Spirit-Music I think you may have misunderstood! It’s not bouncing the tracks and baking them in, it’s consolidating the regions/clips for tracks that may have a bunch of edit points and cuts. The main idea is to just organize everything and make your session manageable 🤙 You should be bouncing down effects and production based things though, an example would be like a vocal delay throw or special guitar effect transition and things like that. Commiting your sounds is really important

@@Battosai thanks so much bro!!! Yeah it’s so strange cause you don’t realize it’s a hindrance until you work in a streamlined clean workflow and session

@@samirmchiali thanks man! And yeah it is, I didn’t know you knew him!

@@mattelder4269 it’s the Mac Studio display in a vesa mount arm and the control surface is the avid s3!

@@david_djent wow! It looks amazing!

@@mattelder4269 thanks, I appreciate you tuning in!

@@Battosai thanks brother I’m glad you enjoyed it! Also curious, what do you think of the thumbnail? CTR right now is not good at all lol

@@david_djent i prefer a less is more approach but that’s really just preference. i think for this style of video your thumbnail makes sense, but the talking head shots you have are more eye catching imo. that youtube studio app be the death of me 😂 cause i feel that click through rate being low. but it’s all part of the process. try not to sweat it too much, our time will come. just keep creating and you will catch fire, i know it. you have all the tools and production level to take this really far.

@@deerejohn1507 yeah no one is saying this will give you a Serban mix, but you can’t get the same last percent he does without it cause it is its own sound

@@nateknowles4 the curves are different to start, which is quite a significant indicator of the characteristic of an EQ. I posted the curves here in the video and you can google pultec curves which are not the same. You could ab this verses a pultec and determine which one fits your needs

@@urbanman1516 no, I mention in the video that I am not and that I don’t believe in doing that when using an EQ since the entire premise of an EQ is to boost or cut gain

@@david_djent The only way to make a true comparison between the processed and unprocessed sound is to ensure that the plugin's input and output levels match. You can't get away from that no matter how you justify it.

@@urbanman1516 well I strongly disagree with you. You would never do that in a real world scenario, I for one would never do that. It makes sense to do that with compression and saturation, but in my opinion it’s nonsensical to level match what you EQ. I’m showing how I would use the plugin and where I would arrive. I’ll never be one of those overly scientific channels, im a very pragmatic and real world scenario kind of guy just showing what I would do on a mix in working on for a client

@@david_djent Nothing overly scientific about level matching. It's very basic knowledge recognized by anyone doing professional mixing. While I might agree there's not always a need to level match when cutting, boosting is a different story. Volume is an enhancer effect, as is boosting an EQ. If you don't remove the volume effect, you have two effects applied at the same time. If that's your desired creative purpose, then go for it, but If you want an accurate judgement of the EQ effect ONLY, you must remove the volume effect. In your video, you're clearly trying to demonstrate how good the EQ sounds regards it's pure tonal quality. If that's the case, you need to remove the volume effect or else the listener is prone to being fooled.

@@urbanman1516 And just 0.1 to 0.2dB overall gain is enough to fool people.

@@RobinZV1 thanks man!

Right? Super musical

Thanks for your help bro!

Thanks so much!

@@themotownboy1 this is just how I would use the tool! I would argue that hearing it on a more distorted and saturated track will let you hear where its limits are a lot quicker and will let you hear its own distortion characteristics versus a cleaner track, but again this is just what I would do 🙂

@@kronik907 I’ve been wanting to do it live! We just don’t have the full super rack soundgrid we moved ours at the church to broadcast and FOH is just using super rack performer with only vocals going through. I’d love to be doing this live sidchaining the guitars and instrument bus to the vocals, those guitars eat up so much headroom

@@david_djent I do the broadcast mix live to video for my church on a Wing, and the wing has a built in 3 band compressor/expander that takes up an FX slot, or a single band compressor/expander that can replace the built in gate slot on any channel or bus without taking up an effects slot. Both options can accept a sidechain trigger from a different channel or bus. I'm already trying to work through exactly how I would set things up, but I'm excited about how I can best use those slots to help glue my mix together better.

@@kronik907 ahhh I see, I’m on the DM7 and most of our DSP real estate is used up but I may look at reallocating inserts to use the multiband comp on there

@@benjaminhixson3918 everything is there for a reason! At the end of the day all that matters is if it sounds good, the client and the audience isnt gonna care if you used 1 plug-in or 20 of them

@@BolerosWithAttitude thanks dude!!

@@jokkearnt thanks so much, I’m stoked to hear it’s been helpful for you! 🙏

Bro what sucks is my iPhone didn’t record the audio, just the screen so I had to take all your audio from my lav mic lol

@@Selfish_Vanity thx bröther

@@Selfish_Vanity just like STAY2GETHER

@@christophersmith2904 thanks man, let me know if you try it in your own stuff!