วีดีโอ

No sane historian can stay muslim after reading Quran chapter 18; No sane mathematician can stay Muslim after reading Quran chapter 4 verse 12-14.

Wow! Outstanding explanation. Subbed! May the Messiah Jesus bless your channel and life!

The video shows it and with a Muslim scholar who now's it plus you see the 26 versions you can buy from Quranic book stores in the middle east all different. Not other religions but your own imam's lying to you in my video list. Watch video in my list as Mohamed hijab turns followers from the truth to hide it.

As I am not from the religion of modern islam - I have no interest in whether Jesus was or was not titled "Mohammed" or whether this is a name or a title. But a little research brings your entire effort & theory to nill/zilch/naught/ridiculous when you try to prove that the Koran is a christian text or that "mohammed" is a title for Jesus - this is because the koran itself in its chapter 42, verse 13, 42:13, mentions Noah, Moses, Jesus in the same verse alongside obviously and implicitly referring to mohammed i.e. "and what we revealed to you" - a revelation only comes to a prophet or messenger in the biblical tradition so an argument saying "well it could just be referring to believers at large" also does not hold any water or reasonable merit. The koran may well be written in syriac / syro aramaic or a mixture of it and arabic but that does not mean it is a christian text or that mohammed is a title for Jesus. Moreover - there is also no evidence that mohammed is a syriac name or title - it is still recognized as an arabic origin name meaning the "praised one" not "praised be". There is no direct name or phrase "mohammed" in Syriac / syro aramaic that translates to "praised be". In Syriac / Syro Aramaic - "praised be" would be "ḥamda bī" Furthermore in Koran's chapter 33:40, it clearly says that mohammed is not the father of any of your men but he is the messenger of God - this clearly and without question identifies mohammed as a distinct messenger entity of God. The Koran may well have several aramaic phrases and expressions as the arabic language was in its infancy - i.e. a mix of syro aramaic and arabic was spoken, but it does not satisfy any of your theories about mohammed being a title for Jesus or that the koran is a non trinitarian christian sect text. It is a scripture written down by mohammed who identifies as a prophet and the scripture claims to confirm the gospels and the torah.

Those dots were not used by Arabs or 1400years old Arabic's. Therefore is no question of missing misplaced dots. This video is fundamentally wrong. Keep trying

I have a serious question. How can we be told that the Quran was compiled by 652 or at tops 690? I mean if there was no Islam up till 800 & the Quran was written in harmony with the Surah & Hadiths how can everyone just agree to the Quran existing between 659-690? Have scholars missed 100-150 years of Quran's for 1400 years? I just can't believe it. Are there no whole Quran's from before 800? How can everyone have missed this?

It seems the god of the Qur'anic text and Hebrew bible is the same god yehweh or Elohim.

There's so much wrong with this explanation. 1) The Quran does not say Dhul Qarnayn is Alexander or Cyrus. Nor does Mihammed. This is just the opinion of a few people from later times. 2) The Quran does not place Dhul Qarnayn in any timeframe. Dhul Qarnayn could easily have been a very ancient King from before recorded history. 3) Almost 90 percent of what is being narrated is not based on the information in the Quran. 4) The narrator keeps making premise after premise that is not based on any authentic Islamic source and derives all sorts of incorrect coclusions. I'd recommend anyone who is open minded to take an english translation of the quran and read through the verses about Dhul Qarnayn in surah (chapter)18 and it will be very clear that the Quran, like in many other stories in it, does not give unneccesary details. 😅 The video is full of information not found in the Qur'an. 😂

@TAlexander What is the single best book that lays out all of the arguments for an Aramaic origin?

Actually, a specific political narrative makes perfect sense in this case as the Quran backs the Byzantine’s in Surah Ar-Rum (The Romans) promising them victory while Heraclius was being propagated as the new Alexander during the same time - the time of the Quran. See the Heraclius- Alexander stele in Cyprus depicting Heraclius with the two horns “Qarnayn” of Alexander (along with his hair style). The Syriac Legend was propaganda praising Heraclius and so you find similar praise in the Quran. Some scholar you are. See the work of Professor Juan Cole “Muhammad Prophet of Peace Amid the Clash of Empires” for more. Other allegories include the companions of the cave.

Muhajireens and Ansars, can represent the arabs and christians, but also in a way it could be the difference based on culture, like those muhajireens refer to those who travel or migrate as required and Ansars as those who settled in some place for long, both have different cultures.

May be there were originally a book with some verses not understood by the people, so they reinserted some other verses as explanations or to justify those as per their understanding. Verse 22/52 refers to some general understanding about past prophets and their teachings got corrupted, but they take that to be related with the current prophet and inserted this 53 verse.

Great work.

Great opinion piece ... very imaginative!

Quran definitely not a book revealed by a person at various instances of his life, but this book was carefully planned in need of a holy book, collecting pre existing literary stuffs and stories and more than one person should have worked on this possibly headed by a person. So whatever info learned they transferred into as a Quranic verses adopting those stories to monotheistic theme, the religion they want to propagate.

So the Hijra calendar should have started by someone powerfull to be used by everyone? as the inscription was from Muawiyah, it should be there prior to his rule?

Great history.

God cannot lie. This means jewish Ebionites were true. 😅

If the Umayyads were Syriac Christens, especially 'Abd al-Malik, the conquering of Spain to India was a Christian expansion. Before lauding him and his general al-Hajjaj for their conquering feats, this means that these Christian Arabs committed atrocities versus anybody who was not of their particular faith. See what al-Hajjaj did at least in Sindh through Muḥammad bin Qasim. It was tot capitulate accepting their faith or be decapitated.

It is fascinating how the reality evolved - and unfortunate how the mythology turned to fabrication and darkness.

Quran is man made

THERES NO EVE IN QURAN, WHO CREATED EVE ??? SATAN WAS CAST OUT AFTER HE NEVER BOWED TO ADAM ,SO HOW SATAN RETUN TO TEMPT ADAM AND HIS WIFE ???

slight correction, nuni means whale, not fish

There is some misunderstanding about Albar and Eulogius: Eulogius became an integrist catholic presbyter after his discovering in Navarre of a surprising book about an arab prophet called Moamath, a figure that had been previously unknown in Cordoba. Eulogius urged some catholics to martyrdom. The bishop of Cordoba, Saul, obtained permission of Abd al-Rahman II, whose actual title in Latin was 'Spaniae Rex Habderragmanus" to gather a 2nd Synod in Cordoba, where the clergy condemed the furor of integrist martyrdom and got to stop it definitely. Albar Cordubensis, from Visigothic and Jewish parents, was a moderate intellectual layman, who lamented the abandon of the cult Latin language in favor of Arabic: "Heu pro dolor, omnes juvenes christiani... harabico elloquio sublimati... linguam suam non advertunt Latini, legem suam (=religion) nesciunt Christiani..." Woe! All Christian youths skillfully speak Arabic... Latins avoid their own tongue, Christians ignore their own law (=religion)..." Eulogius was urgerd by his bishop to pronouce a mass in Arabic, he denied and instead came into the great mosque and proferred insults agaisnt Muhammad, he had the opportunity of retract and apologise, but denied, then was executes. Albar however did nothing like that and died peaceful at an older age.

Essential Study material for all muslims who are turned into drones.

Jesus is actually the Servant of God, and God put His Spirit on Jesus, according to the Holy Gospel. Let us read Matthew, chapter 12 verses 17 & 18: This was to fulfill what was spoken through the prophet Isaiah: “Here is My Servant whom I have chosen, the one I Love, in whom I delight; I will put My Spirit on him and he will proclaim justice to the nations". (Matthew 12:17-18)

Quran 101 in a nutshell ... The quran is originally partly (the so-called "meccan" surahs) a collection of christian preaching texts used by the anti-trinitarian jewish-christians called Nazarenes, they are called "nasara" (نَصَرَ) in the quran, while the trinitarian (orthodox byzantine) christians whom they fought and hated are called "mushrikuns" (مشركون) ie "associators" or "polytheists" because they associate Jesus to God (which is "shirk" شِرْك that opposes to Allah's unicity called "tawheed" تَوْحِيدُ ). So islam is originally a heretic christian sect.

About Jesus' death in a Proto-Koran: In the angle between the Northern and northwestern inner inscriptions of the Dome of The Rock appear these words "... Oh God, bless your Servant and Messenger Jesus son of Mary, Let Peace be on him on the day of his Birth, on the day of his Death and on the day of his Resurrection, Thus is Jesus son of Mary, proclamation of the Truth..."

Yes Yes and Yes!

Finding Christian Arianism within the Quran. th-cam.com/video/H7GexaEphQg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=p_jQ0ytcXeK0Cp

Finding Christian Arianism within the Quran. th-cam.com/video/H7GexaEphQg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=p_jQ0ytcXeK0Cp

.

لو سمحت اعرض لنا جميع كتب المورخين الباحثين في تاريخ الاسلام والقران للاسف تم خداعنا واجعل الترجمه العربيه متاحه في فديوهاتك

Why schows the quran angel Gabriel another behaviour than the angel gabriel of the old new testament and the bible,,, vas the angel gabriel coruptet 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

I came back and revisited these videos after 2 years and I'm still impressed by both the breadth and depth of the research. I mean for this video alone, the sources include multiple editions of a 16th century Cosmographia, a 15th century pilgrimage book, an obscure Dutch encyclopaedia and a crusader time psalter. On top of that, there was research into multiple Dutch artists as well as an ancient Italian family which settled in Bruges during the middle ages. And more than just presenting what others produced, there is some genuine scholarship going on. The research is not just reproduced, but connected and conclusions are drawn. And compared to the other videos in the series, this one is actually pretty light. It's just that in this one, the process is more laid out. The other videos had way more sources and more effort going into them. It's amazing seeing this unfold in real time.

For the algorithm

Sure "Muhammad" can be used as a title, maybe a title for Jesus, so for "Abd allah", but then we can also use these titles for Moses, Lot, Abraham, ishmael, isaac, Adam and whatnot. The Quran also seperates Jesus and Muhammad as being 2 different entities. In the Quran there is not a single mention of Jesus being Muhammad. I think its not sense making to say that because Jesus had a title like "Muhammad" or similar to Muhammad, doesnt mean it falsifies the existence of the Muhammad who was there in the 7th century. The Muhammad we are referring to is محمد بن عبد الله (سبحانه وتعالى), "Muhammad son of the slave of God", so this cannot be applied to Jesus, because according to christianity, Jesus' father was God and according to islamic theology, Jesus was born without a father. Also i want to say that "Muhammad" isnt necessarely a title, because before Muhammad, there were times when parents heard that there would arrive someone whose name will be "Muhammad" and be the prophet of God, so these parents gave their child that name. So then there were other Muhammads, who never claimed to be prophets or whatnot.

These are semetic languages. I cannot say that the quran was originally aramaic because of the word „salam“ i.e peace in arabic peace means سلام salam written like „slam“ and in aramaic ܫܠܡ shlam written like „shlm“ 😅 or hebrew or whatever.

Issa Ibne Mariyam Rasoolallah ( pbuh) most of Nabataeans of Arab were Nastorian christians. Petra was Capital of Nabetians Christians.

Dom of Rock was temple of mother Marry in past.

Dom of the rock was known as Temple of mother Marry in past .

Nabataeans of Arab were follower of Issa Ibne Mariyam Rasoolallah (pbuh) known as Nastorian christian ( a break away group of Christianity in Arabia) They were masters of Deserts and also great warriors.Petra was Capital of Nabetians Nastorian christians .

King Muayiua ( Ammir O Momins) built Arabic Empire and Parsia ( iran ) was part of it, with the help of local Warlords and Nabataeans of Arab in 7th century.

Issa Ibne Mariyam Rasoolallah pbuh is Soul' of Allah.!!

King Muayiua established the Arab kingdom which included Parsia also.

There was a temple of mother Marry built at the same place where Dom of Rock was built.

I thought jesus Is Eissa clearly stated in the quran

Nabataeans of Arab were known as master of Star's and deserts in 7th century. They were great worriers and majority of them were followers of Issa ibne Mariyam Rasoolallah pbuh, a break away group of Christianity known as Nastorian christian.