วีดีโอ

All praise and esteem and Ahaya asher Ahaya YaHuWaH Tsavuot Most High.

Great job bro!!

quitting porn and disciplining my mind and my eyes was the hardest thing i’ve ever had to do in my life. love you, brother. hope you’re well.

I have a question in regards to Halal meat. In my country (NZ) all meat is Halal (aside from one or two private butchers). Is Halal meat technically sacrificed to an idol (I heard they pray words over it which basically means Allah is the highest). I've got this feeling I should be staying away from any meat unless I know for sure it is not Halal. This is quite tricky.

I enjoyed reading the first 40 pages of your book off the link, but I hate scrolling and reading through this phone. We are ordering 1. I wanted 3 but can't right now.

The hubris of people today is astounding. These ppl think they have a greater textual understanding of the translational/transmitting process?? *Do you speak 8 languages?? lol do you then speak and write in them more clearly than some of the greatest genius’ ever to walk on the face of earth like athanasius, jerome, Erasmus, Tyndale, sattler, etc etc you think you’re wiser and more informed than all these men and that these men died in vain? How many parchments have you analyzed? This is incredible hubris.

That was well done.

Great to see you again! Excellent video brother. Love the Shadow cam ❤

"For this is my blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins" (not the remission of the law)

Anyone from New Zealand round here??

💭

I often imagine YAHS realm as a court. Are you suggesting that YAH is the accuser(satan) of Israel? Interesting take if so. The people were not grateful for David's work on the throne and seemingly sided with sister didiler Absolom. Joab seemed ruthless and could have been more merciful. Solid point, and great thought exercise. YAH accused Israel. If David had followed the Exodus 30v12-16 rules for census maybe his problems with his children may have not gone sideways. The first scribe didn't realize YAH was accusing in hindsight the 2nd spotted it and modern christology sees satan as an individual not a role. Fantastic.

Good work finding and sharing that pearl. May you be blessed

So you reject that Mary is the Mother of God (even though that title is in the bible Luke 1:43) on the grounds that she was only the mother of His human nature and not His divinity. 3 Issues with this: 1.) Women are mothers of persons not "natures," Jesus is one divine person not two subjects, so she is His mother and He is God. 2.) If you argue that Mary is not God's mother because she is only the mother of the human nature, then you are arguing that the human nature does not truly belong to God. Acts 20:28 states that God has blood, the human nature therefore belongs to God and that human nature was conceived by the Holy Spirit through Mary, making her the mother of that human nature. To simplify, Mary is the mother of Jesus' blood -> Jesus' blood = God's blood -> Mary is mother of God's blood. 3.) The title "Mother of God" is in the bible... Luke 1:43 says "How is it that the mother of my Lord has come to me?" this is of course an echo of King David who in 2 Samuel 6:9 says "How is it that the Ark of YHWH has come to me?" and in Luke John the baptist leaps for joy while in 2 Samuel King David dances in joy. This is clearly demonstrating that the "Lord" in Luke 1:43 is YHWH the God of the bible. Therefore Luke 1:43 is saying that mary is the "mother of my YHWH" or in other words "mother of my God." Other claims you make about "queen of heaven" and such are misunderstandings... God can be called baal (hosea 2:16 to clarify I'm showing that it USED TO BE the case that God was called baal not that we still do!) or elohim which were generic titles of pagan gods without that meaning that our God is a pagan god. Similarly "queen of heaven" is a generic title which was used for a pagan goddess, just because we reuse that title for someone who it ACTUALLY FITS doesnt make that someone a pagan goddess, this is simple logic. Solomon's mother was the queen mother, so we see that the mother of the King of Israel is the Queen, who is the King of Israel? Jesus. Who is His mother? Mary. Okay now connect the dots. Revelation 12 also speaks about the crowning of Mary in heaven. These aren't traditions that were just made up... they're from the bible, repent and look into East Orthodoxy. Notice how this whole time Ive used simple logic, Jesus said "I am the truth" and John 1 says He is the Logos. He is logic. Do not be afraid of logic, God says in Isaiah 1:18 "come let us reason together." You arent so depraved as calvinists would have you believe that you cant follow logic... Logic comes from God.

"the angel wasn't doing good enough" 😅

This was so good brother Daniel!!!! I’m going to share this one! Shadow looks great! Shalom shalom!

The Doctrine of the Immaculate Conception and the Virgin birth are not one and the same. That said, Jesus was conceived in Mary by The holy Ghost.

You very last sentence stopped me in my tracks.

A good video, that DISMISSES the myth this video is proposing th-cam.com/video/rEnBMaG14k8/w-d-xo.htmlsi=Co8Z3pF8WJfi7z0s

1stJohn 4: 1-4 4 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. 2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: 3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. 4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

The Testaments of the 12 Patriarchs are thought to be composed around 180 BC, they are filled with Messiah prophecy. One in particular fits into this study from Benjamin 26 And there shall arise in the latter days one beloved of the Lord, of the tribe of Judah and Levi, a doer of His good pleasure in his mouth, with new knowledge enlightening the Gentiles.

You know what would happen to a young woman with child not being married? Remember what Judah said should happen to Thamar? Also you know that a woman being with child is not a miracle since everyday young women are with child? In order for it to be a miracle, as Matthew the inspired author clearly said, she had to be a virgin. That is a sign and a miracle. Otherwise it is just a common thing.

Thanks for another helpful video. I have a comment on some verses you quoted, only tangentially related to the virgin birth/"Mother of God" topic, which you and the article author succinctly refuted. At min. 24 or so, you cite the texts John 7:5, Mark 3:20-21, and Mark 3:31-25. The author of the article you read, and I'm assuming you also, seem to agree with the popular interpretation that Jesus' brothers and family thought he was "crazy" and did not believe in him as Messiah before his resurrection. However there is evidence to the contrary, that actually they WERE believers and followers of his ministry PRIOR to the crucifixion, (they may have had disagreements, but not opposition or rejection). The fact that James especially was most probably a believer/disciple well BEFORE Jesus' resurrection appearance is evidenced by James' very early ascension to a leadership position in the foundling movement (see Acts 15). An alternate explanation of these verses is put forth in chapter 2 of Jeffrey Butz's book "The Brother of Jesus, and the Lost Teachings of Christianity". Specifically, the reference to Jesus being "crazy" or "out of his mind" or "amazed" may actually refer to the crowd or disciples that surrounded him, not to Jesus. Also possible is that Mark may have inserted his own interpretation, putting Jesus' family, just as he often did the disciples/apostles, in a negative light, having been influenced by Paul. Matthew and Luke have parallels to Mark 3: 31-35, but NOT to Mark 3:20-21, (these are UNIQUE to Mark), and so these later verses in Mark may NOT necessarily relate back to Mark's verses 20-21, (in fact the preceding verses, and so context, for 20-21, verses 13-19, is the choosing of the 12, making it more likely that verses 20-21 is in reference to the disciples, and not Jesus' to family), and absence of verses 20-21 REMOVES any negative motive or disbelief on the family's part (which was inferred only from verses 20-21) and merely shows his family seeking him. Jesus' comment "my mother and brothers are those who hear the word of God and do it" could well INCLUDE both Jesus' natural family and his disciples, (in fact one literal translation from the Greek says "(as for) my mother and brothers, THEY are the ones who listen", and may be being held up as "model disciples") , and may NOT represent a contradistinction between true disciples and natural family, which has been the long held popular interpretation. James Tabor and Robert Eisenman both note the prominence of James in the early, original "Jesus movement" and the probability that he was a disciple DURING Jesus' lifetime, (may even have been at the "Last Supper", and in fact may be "the disciple whom Jesus loved"), and did not just become one "suddenly after the resurrection appearance", (making his conversion similar to Paul's fraudulent experience). Anyway, just thought I'd mention this as interesting possibility. I look forward to more of your videos. I always enjoy and learn from them. Thanks.

What Catholics claim proves that Jesus is the Messiah, actually does just the opposite. The Jewish Messiah has to be of the bloodline of David. Joseph was of the bloodline of David, Mary was not. Mary was not even of the same house as David. David is from the tribe of Judah, Mary was of the tribe of Levi. We know this because Mary's sister, Elizabeth, was married to a Levite priest, and Levite men are only permitted to marry Levite women, so if Elizabeth was a Levite, Mary was, too, so no blood of David in her. Even if Mary had been of the bloodline of David, it couldn't be inherited through her, because in a patriarchal society, the bloodline comes from the father, not the mother. Whether or not you are considered a Jew, comes through your mother, but your bloodline does not. If Mary was a virgin when he was born, then Jesus does not have the bloodline of David, and is not the Messiah. What is more likely, is that when they say she was a virgin, was that she was a temple virgin unti she married Joseph, and not a virgin for her entire life, and that Joseph was the actual father of Jesus. Saying that the child within her was of the holy spirit, does not have to mean that it was the holy spirit that impregnated her. It could mean that the holy spirit was present in the child. We also know that Jesus had at least one brother, James, who was a prominent figure in the New Testament, so we know that Mary was not the eternal virgin that Catholics claim she was. She was just a vessel that God chose to use once, and had no further significance after that. Putting her in a place equal to Jesus, and praying to her, is a sin.

Daniel, there is another reference to the term ALMA as for a virgin…this is in reference to Rebecca, when Abraham sent forth his servant to find a wife for Isaac. Here it states that in the Hebrew, that Rebecca was a young maiden, or a damsel but yet the word is Alma in the Hebrew text…and obviously, Rebecca was a virgin, as she was a very young woman of barely puberty, and a damsel also represents a woman that might be as young as 12 years old.

Thanks to Nathan for writing this article and thanks to you Daniel for reading it and offering your thoughts . Isaiah 7 mentioned that the child's mother was a prophetess , something that Mary was never called . If one reads further on into chapter 8 , they'd see that none of the details match any of the details in Yeshua's life , it's not a Messianic prophecy .... and that's okay . There are so many King Arthur movies that I've forgotten which one it was but at the end of one these King Arthur movies it explains how some of the remaining pagans in Britain just changed the name of their mother goddess to Mary . It goes way further back into Babylon with Semiramis , Ishtar and Astarte , mother goddess , "queen of heaven" worship , nothing more , same thing with turning Yeshua into a "god-man" , yes He was divine but not as in deity , He was divine as in closeness with Yeh Ho VaH

Thank you for bringing this very important article to light. It goes into more depth on issues that I myself looked into very much appreciated. Extra work that Nathan did

Same comment as Marty

Thanks Brother, good to hear you again.

Yes Paul was a false apostle, BUT the Torah is no longer in effect. *Matt **5:17**-18* 17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them *BUT TO FULFILL THEM.* 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law *UNTIL EVERYTHING IS ACCOMPLISHED.* When Jesus died, he had accomplished His task. He fulfilled the laws given to Moses from the time of His birth to the time of His death. His entire life was by the word of God. If God wanted us to sacrifice goats then why did He destroy the Herod’s temple? If he wanted us to continue eating kosher, why did He give Peter a revelation of “unclean” foods and tell Him to “eat”. Why did He tell a centurion to call for Peter and for Peter to go with him? *Hosea 6:4-7* 4 “What can I do with you, Ephraim? What can I do with you, Judah? Your love is like the morning mist, like the early dew that disappears. 5 Therefore I cut you in pieces with my prophets, I killed you with the words of my mouth- then my judgments go forth like the sun. *6 For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings.* 7 As at Adam, they have broken the covenant; they were unfaithful to me there. God explains through Hosea the prophet that Israel (northern Israel = Ephraim and southern Israel = Judah) is like an adulterous wife, and He a devoted Husband. Other “gods” and nations/kings are like the lovers. God wants us to acknowledge and love Him. By loving Him we love each other and vice versa. *Matt **25:40** Parable of the Sheep and Goats* “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’ This is the mercy He wants us to show to one another, not sacrificing goats or food to Him. And whether we are rich or poor we should call on His name, trust in Him to help us, not ourselves or others alone. *Talmud Yoma 39b* The Sages taught: During the tenure of Shimon HaTzaddik, the lot for God always arose in the High Priest’s right hand; after his death, it occurred only occasionally; but during the *forty years prior to the destruction of the Second Temple* , the lot for God did *not* arise in the High Priest’s *right* hand at all. So too, *the strip of crimson* wool that was tied to the head of the goat that was sent to Azazel *did not turn white* , and the *westernmost lamp* of the candelabrum *did not burn* continually. And the *doors of the Sanctuary opened by themselves* as a sign that they would soon be opened by enemies, until Rabban Yoḥanan ben Zakkai scolded them. During the 40 years immediately following the death of Christ in 30AD, the lot decided which goat would be sacrificed was always the *left* one. *Matt **25:31**-33, Prophecy about the return of Christ, mirroring the 40 years recorded in the Talmud following the death of Christ* 31 “When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his glorious throne. 32 All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33 He will put the *sheep on his right* and the *goats on his LEFT*. The strip of crimson, a symbol of sin, did not turn white. Meaning the people of Israel were not forgiven of their sins for that year, every year for 40 years until the temple was destroyed. The mosaic laws were a symbol of how far Israel was from God, which is why it has 3 parts, each getting closer to the ark of the covenant where God symbolically sat. The laws demonstrated how the people of God should be separate from other nations, how good can not dwell with evil. Just like the tares and the wheat. Some of the laws, like boiling a kid (baby goat) in its mother’s milk, were directly associated with pagan rituals, and so were banned to prevent pagan practices. God doesn’t want us to stone adulterers, that’s a symbol of the death we deserve for committing adultery, but Jesus died the death we deserve so we don’t have to. This is how God shows mercy to us, now we have to show mercy to others by NOT following mosaic law, therefore NOT stoning people to death.

If you search for the word "heart" (H3820) in a digital Bible, a lot of beautiful clarification on this is found in Psalms and Proverbs. Some of my favorites: Psalm 19:8 The statutes of the Lord are right, rejoicing the ❤: the commandments of the Lord are pure, enlightening the eyes. (Consider that one in conjunction with psalm40:6, Jer 7:22, Hosea 6:6-7, Isaiah 1:11-12). Psalm 51:10 Create in me a clean ❤, O God, and renew a right spirit within me. Sacrifices of God are a broken spirit, and a contrite ❤ God will not despise. Psalm 37:30 The mouth of the righteous speaketh wisdom, and his tongue talketh of judgement. The law of God is in his ❤, none of his steps shall slide. Psalm 66:18 If I regard iniquity in my ❤ the Lord will not hear me. Psalm 7:10 My defense is of God, which saveth the upright in ❤. Psalm 119:32 I will run the way of thy commandments when thy shall enlarge my ❤. Psalm 141:4 Incline not my ❤ to any evil thing, to practice wicked works with men who work iniquity: and let me not eat of their dainties. Proverbs 2:2 Incline thine ear unto wisdom, apply thy ❤ to understanding (this whole chapter is great - about the righteous path to life vs the wicked path to death). So many of these wonderful verses!

We took a family trip to Guatemala last spring and fell in love with dozens of strays. Blew are budget feeding them steaks and burger's. All our best memories were spending time with animals that no one wanted. This is very good.

I wish your church was close to me. Id be there every Sunday

The scriptures you quoted, my friend, were directed at the apostles who were going out to preach. Jesus did not leave it to chance how they were to go and be supported. It is our privilege to take care of disciples who have left all to go forth with the gospel. You can find this in Matthew 10, Mark 10, Luke 10, and John 10.

Agrreeeds

Amen

You are a light to this world giving out the book for free. How's the dogo?

So pretty

Good for you, Daniel. Caring for animals is therapeutic. They show love and appreciation in ways that heal us and teach us life lessons.

Awww

Listening AFTER. The Lord led me to the same thing. Satan through religions has deceived us to vote for "the lesser of two evils". Which would you rather eat? Buffalo chips or Bear Scat? After voting for Reagan and Busch and then finding out how EVIL they were, I repented. The battle is in the spirit not flesh.

Where is all that water coming from?

Good point, Daniel.

Why do the genealogies matter if Joseph is not Jesus' biological father? Great question Daniel! Or why is Joseph's father Heli according to Luke and Jacob was the father of Jesus according to Matthew?

I grew up in fundamentalist Christianity and remained for nearly half a century when I left the religion 20 plus years ago and left Jesus too because I thought he was owned by Christianity. I came back to Christ over the past few years but not Christianity. Today I see Jesus and Christianity as two different things and Paul as the architect of Christianity who is responsible for most of the doctrines. This makes Jesus' birth and death the focus and we ignore the life of Christ and his teachings agree with you that Paul is a self proclaimed false apostle.

It looks like he made AI art by hand