How did we get the Bible? by Dr. Jason Lisle
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2024
- Fan-favorite CFS speaker Dr. Jason Lisle is back to answer the question: How did we get the Bible?
biblicalscienc...
rumble.com/c/B...
creationfellowshipsantee@gmail.com
lets.church
![How we got the Bible with Dr. Jason Lisle [sermon]](/img/n.gif)
Love you so much, Dr. Lisle! You have helped me and so many others understand God and his amazing creation. Thank you so much for being such a wonderful disciple of Jesus Christ !Someday soon, would you please give a lecture on the Trinity?
Nice job as always CFS! Cant go wrong with Dr Lisle!
Thank you for this presentation… this format allows one to watch and rewatch …🙏✝️
I see I'm coming here rather late, but this may help anyone else doing so: There may be some later video presentations by Jason after this, in which he might incorporate some of the questions asked here. Jason does a great job explaining how the OT came to down to us and why we can rely upon basically the critical Hebrew and Greek Texts we have today, since God preserved the originals for us by being able to compare all the different manuscripts we have. But there were some things in the questions he couldn't be specific about, since his studies are mostly about science, not history or textual criticism (e.g., one of the things he couldn't recall on the spot is the CBGM - Coherence-Based Genealogical Method - which some very Biblical Christians are also participating in).
So for further REFERENCE and help on those questions about the original Texts, the _Textus Receptus_ and how we got the Canon, etc., I'd also recommend:
th-cam.com/video/uTeLO-61FAA/w-d-xo.html (2022 - G3 Conference - How We Got our Bible; qued to where the 'meaty' facts begin),
th-cam.com/video/XmlHYeT8vyc/w-d-xo.html (2022 - G3 Conference - Making Sense of Manuscripts),
th-cam.com/video/DTki0ESXIJk/w-d-xo.html (Michael Kruger - 2022 - How Did We Get Our Bible),
th-cam.com/video/r1iiusiS6lg/w-d-xo.html (at a church, DEC 2022, The Reliability of Scripture),
th-cam.com/video/l8EUtEt7RX8/w-d-xo.html (2022, How Can We Trust That the Bible We Have Today Is What God Originally Inspired?),
th-cam.com/video/LVVRfu1eLSU/w-d-xo.html [James White interviewing Michael Kruger on the Biblical Canon; who decided the books of the Bible?] Searching for their names in YT might give you more recent videos.
Jason was 'fuzzy' about the LSB (Legacy Standard Bible) which actually uses "Yahweh" as the name of God; definitely not "Jehovah".
I personally prefer retaining LORD, since we cannot know 100% how it should be pronounced/written (and many pastors don't even pronounce the English the same as the assumed Hebrew in those cases). But it definitely makes a point that "day" is defined in Genesis 1:5 ("And God called the light day, and the darkness He called night. And there was evening and there was morning, one day.") as 1 normal day of daylight and night. You can read it for free from here:
www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%201%3A5-7&version=LSB . (Overall, it's not much different than the NASB or ESV which for very deep Bible study; apart from using Hebrew and Greek as well, you can find most English Bible translations online in order to compare all of them together.) PS: My name is Daniel B. Sedory.
I was a Christian for the first 45 years of my life and fell away. I wanted desperately to get back to God so I prayed and I read and studied the Bible and how it was written and wanted to believe so incredibly bad but I just can’t get past the facts that I’ve learned such as the fundamental stories are based on older ancient writings and it therefore cannot be solely “God’s Word”. There’s a much earlier creation account in the Enuma Elish, the flood story, there’s a much earlier version in the Epic of Gilgamesh. There are even other people who were said to have done the same things as Jesus, both doing miracles and dying and living again. I promise I’m not trying to be argumentative, I’m just simply trying to find someone who can help me comprehend how it’s possible to believe what seems so obviously just another take on the earlier myths. I am sincerely trying to reconcile this in my heart and mind.
Thanks for sharing!
Have an autographed Book From Dr Jason Lisle 👍✝️
The King James Version of the Bible has been used in Christ to save millions of people over the last 400+ years. It has a proven track record of bringing people to the Lord.
God can use anything as a tool to bring people closer to Him. He is God after all. But that doesn't mean that it is the most accurate variation.
Does Dr. Jason Lisle have any arguments with Dr. Kent Hovind?
KJV ONLY. The others have changed meanings and ommited verses or changed meanings .
Hey sir, I think you missed timestamp 1:22:21 there’s a good reason some ‘verses’ are omitted. God bless.:)
The Romans wrote it to mollify the early christians. It worked.
The old testament was around way before the Romans and Jewish people in that day and to this day are coming to Jesus as their Savior...they are Messianic Jews.
I have to begin this with i love Dr Lisle and his ministry lest you take the rest of this wrong.
Brothers and sisters, the oldest generally being the best is not an accurate statement. It does not take into account who was doing the writing.
Consider the possibility of it being written by someone who didn't like certain doctrines, or even in some cases, dogma. Might they have changed the text or left some out that did not fit what they wanted it to say?
Textus Sainaiaticus and Textus Vaticanus would be two examples of this. It truly saddens me that well into this video he has given no mention of the Textus Receptus. Especially considering that it is the one most reliable using his different families of texts example.
Now take into account that Textus Sainaiaticus was likely written by an Alexandra. Look to the only mention of them in God's Word in Acts 6. Does that make you want to trust them?
Textus Vaticanus? With all of the unbiblical doctrines and beliefs in the Roman Catholic church. Need I say more?
If you are going to use the NASB, beware of the bracketed [ ] verses. In the one I have this denotes "probably not in the best (by which they mean "oldest") manuscripts. Ignore those brackets.
If you search "Maverick University why we use the KJV" on this site it will give you a very good history of how the Textus Receptus came to us and totally destroy the NIV.
The below link will give you a look at what the ESV does to scripture and the type of people that were behind it.
God Bless
www.americanpresbyterianchurch.org/the-esv-is-a-perversion-of-the-word-of-god/
The NIV completely corrupts Romans 6:1,2. It changes a definate artical into a verb. Instead of being held in the domain of the flesh, it is defined as an action. God forbid, how shall we that are DEAD to (the) sin LIVE any longer THEREIN. It's the flesh where our souls were bound to. Our soul was delivered out of that dominion and placed INTO Christ. Read Romans 7. The woman is the soul. The husband is the flesh. If the husband be dead the woman is free to marry another, which is Christ!