วีดีโอ

Fantastic video as always. Thank you. I love your voice btw. I play soccer and music. In both settings I’ve felt that sense of creation where everything is willed and automatic. It’s such a good feeling. Sometimes I’ll do something while playing soccer that I didn’t even know I could do. I find the best way to find this rhythm is to balance thought and perception. There’s a certain amount of thought that’s required for tactics and communication. But then there are moments when things are rolling in the right direction and that’s when to let thought go and really focus on as much as you can perceive. The body can lead the way from there. There’s an important idea in soccer of being in the right place at the right time. Some of the best strikers were amazing at just that (Pippo Inzaghi comes to mind - look up some videos). I find a lot of that timing (which provides the space) comes from this balance of thought and perception, mind and body. And when these are firing in the good sequence that sort of creative flow can really explode.

Nietzsche is a philosopher of types. He’s pointing to the profundity of the species still mistaking what they really are (introverts and extroverts being night and day subspecies). You can also hear Whitehead’s influence on Deleuze. I think all three are great, and recommend them.

I’ve watched all your videos and TH-cam didn’t recommend your last two. I was just wondering if you put out any and look you up and there the videos were. Glad you’re posting. Sad I didn’t see sooner 😢

How does he explain the transition between the common notions and the essence : the associative notions (imaginative, fire) and the essential notion (contemplative, light) ? I think we understand the essence of the object itself not continuously after understanding its relations, but with a new gap : because of the subjective universal symbol given by the object, not by the object itslef. We can have a universal knowledge only if we search inside. And maybe we can say that if the profound subject is identical to the object, having a subjective knowledge is also knowing the object itself. For this reason, individuation / attain the highest level of the reason can be related to the knowledge of the object (which is equivalent to the transcendantal subject?) The question is : life : is it somewhere else than in the subject ? Is the object really attainable by the subject ? If yes, to what extent ?

Thank you... this was really exceptional video

Another excellent explication and illustration of a concept I hadn’t even considered much before. I think with this video you yourself must experience a “propitious Act of Creation” that helps your followers to realize something more profound. Great work!

Bergson's philosophy has been widely debunked. Bertrand Russell, for example "saw Bergson's arguments at best as persuasive or emotive speculation but not at all as any worthwhile example of sound reasoning or philosophical insight.

Monetising wanker. Should be ashamed!

Thanks a lot for your efforts! 🤯🙏

Thus the oxymoron "social sciences" denies scientific method while pretending to be scientific to claim truth for things that aren't true using Hegel's method of talking BS

Just started Spinoza: Practical Philosophy, so this is perfect timing. Thanks for the upload mate

Good video!

Thank you for your work! I’m always excited when you post a new video. If possible, I’d also love to learn more about works with Guattari from you.

As brilliant - thank you!

Ayyyy congrats on scoring the sponsorship! And in such a fascinating video!!

Awesome and highly educative videos, thank you keep it up!! I love your editing you make deleuzes ideas much clearer

this guy gets it

Spinoza, Nietzsche, Deleuze. Can it get better than that? Great video.

nice

Sending love.

Yaaaay ne w videoooooooo lestasdagogooOOOOO

Excellent work, thanks for your dedication

To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/DeleuzePhilosophy/. You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.

I'm working on an essay about Deleuze and Wittgenstein and only now i understand i have to read the Logic of sense Aaaaaaahhhhhhh

Excellent 👍

Regarding the Stoic consideration of Future Contingents, and the statement “There will be a sea battle tomorrow.” @12:18 “Therefore the statement was both possible and impossible at the same time, which of course is a contradiction in terms.” This doesn’t seem right. Rather, the statement was possible yesterday but impossible today, precisely because they weren’t made _at the same time_. The statement is both possible and impossible irrespective of time, which I think means the contradiction occurs only theoretically, if we consider time as an unreality. Teasing out the relationship between the terms “time” and “sense” as elements of a fourth dimension is a little more complicated, but I think both are indeed like the term “snark”, purely superficial, “at the surface of things”, where they ride on priors: the snark on snake + shark, time on change, and sense on … I’m not quite sure, but perhaps that which lacks sense, or what appears as non-sense. Looking forward to the next video.

This video, like all your videos, is simply fantastic. I realize it’s a year old, but congratulations on your successful relocation. At the end of the video, you thank all your patrons, and now I’m interested in becoming a patron myself. I certainly want access to any content reserved for patrons, but even if there isn’t any special content I’m happy to lend some support. Thanks again for developing such a helpful series of videos!

Nietzsche and Philosophy changed my life and Deleuze's metaphysics was something I held with me all through my degrees in sociology and anthropology.

You know strangly a lot of this reminds me of Schopenhauer's philosophy

Good to know that Deleuze finally got to where much of eastern has been for thousands of years. This sounds very much like Trika Shaivism as well as Advaita Vedanta

As a psychology stundent interested in spinoza and immanence this was very helpful

This work is amazing and invaluable. Thank you so much for this.

My take away was… a little bit of immanence is good for you.. sorry most of what was narrated although clear and logically sounding hung in the air around.. sorry i‘m a bit of a noob on this subject matter 😁

Oh my god. Clarity! ❤😍

Stuff and nonsense

My question for you is do you see the inherent similarities between this metaphysical framework and Religious and spiritual ideas across the world that all make sense when viewed this way? Other comments reference taoism, but also Nirvana, “Christ consciousness” and other transcendent beliefs have existed for millennia, and behind the mantra and wide cultural differences always lies the same belief and trust in the One mind, Heart, God, system, virtualization, behind it all

Glad I found your channel. I've subscribed and now watching your videos. Thank you so much.

Ok, now that I've watch your playlist forward and backwards 3 times I think I am prepared to start taking a crack at D & R . Thanks !

Gonzalez Ruth Hall Helen Wilson Brian

working conditions have never been better in all the history of humanity - but i think he is talking more about the neglect of certain classes and their relative "rights" ( as in compared to the top of the tree ) in the ever developing nature of work in capitalism. whereas as far as the 3rd point is concerned he is talking about the power of manipulation it offers to individuals. the power to make masses off of individuals ( the product of "power" )... fake news and all that

can you make a video on french petitions against age of consent laws? It might be related to this issue on a deeper level

I found a treasure on this channel ❤ thank you for this amazing content.

GOOD SHIT

These are the literal teachings of the Buddha

tampons

penis pines dialektik?

These explanations are so clear and the diagrams are great, definitely subscribing.