Really love your videos. Been reading Deleuze for several years now and I love seeing people try and put Deleuze in simple language. Your project is probably the best i've come across! Can I suggest you do a deep dive into Difference and Repetition at some point like you did Logic of Sense?
Thanks a lot! I've received another request for D&R so I'll put it on top of my list. There might be a couple projects published in the meantime but I'll start working on it :)
Thank you Jonas! I appreciate your feedback. By the way following your request and someone else's, I'll be working on D&R and hopefully publish a video on it in the future :)
What an insightful video… you have such great teaching skills, it’s crazy. You HAVE to make a video on Delleuze’s work on cinema and movement!! Not only because it’s an amazing topic, but because next week I have a presentation on the topic at college and learning it from you would be very welcoming 😂😂😂 Greetings from Brazil! Keep up the awesome work
Thanks a lot, Hector! Glad you like this content. I probably won't be able to make a video on Cinema by next week tbh :D Best of luck for your presentation, though!
Wow your videos are really good, I immediately subscribed. If you don't mind, what I never really understood is how positive and reactive forces differ from Hegel's Dialectic? And what do you think of Badious criticism of Deleuze (Deleuze is a thinker of the One and Badiou is a thinker of multiplicities etc.)? Would make interesting videos. Keep up the good work!
Thank you, appreciate it! Hegel's dialectics is directly opposed by Deleuze (in particular in chapter 1 of D&R if you want to have a look) on the basis of Deleuze's critique of representation, where he argues that Hegelian dialectics, for all its genius, still proceeds from the Platonic assumption that there are certain foundational principles (matter, mind, finiteness and the infinite in the case of Hegel) that are given in advance rather than synthesized. This makes for the "magic trick" that you see in all forms of Platonism. As for Badiou, I (humbly) think he is wrong about Deleuze. I also know that some of Badiou's disciples, like Quentin Meillassoux (who is otherwise a brilliant thinker) still maintain that Deleuze is a hypostatic thinker. But the whole of Deleuze's philosophy consists precisely in a critique of the given in the form of the One, the subject, the material world, etc., so I don't know how they can maintain their critique without entertaining a serious misunderstanding of Deleuze's thought at the same time.
![Difference and Repetition [part 2] Masks and Sacred Geometry](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VgzcAKVdfic/mqdefault.jpg)
![Difference and Repetition [part 2] Masks and Sacred Geometry](/img/tr.png)
![Difference and Repetition [part 1] The Interstellar Conversation](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f6ujTzYb-9k/mqdefault.jpg)
![[[OFFICIAL MV]] เอิ้นขวัญให้อ้าย- อ๊ะอาย สกุณาพร | ค่ายเพลงเป็นหนึ่ง](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/83x6L3X3qh0/mqdefault.jpg)
your content is so solid
Thank you PunishedFelix, that means a lot
Really love your videos. Been reading Deleuze for several years now and I love seeing people try and put Deleuze in simple language. Your project is probably the best i've come across! Can I suggest you do a deep dive into Difference and Repetition at some point like you did Logic of Sense?
Thanks a lot! I've received another request for D&R so I'll put it on top of my list. There might be a couple projects published in the meantime but I'll start working on it :)
@@deleuzephilosophy Yes do D&R bro!! That would be awesome!
Please , do D&R™️
@@ilyataraschansky9527 First video on D&R is coming out this week!
Amazing content, the images that you select are very beatiful and potent. Thank you so much for the effort!
Thank you Jonas! I appreciate your feedback. By the way following your request and someone else's, I'll be working on D&R and hopefully publish a video on it in the future :)
Thank you very much for your videos on Deleuze, they are really usefull and help to build on the understanding of his works. Keep up the good work!
Thank you, I appreciate it!
GOATED
Not to ridicule anyone here but you are really god-sent.
Really appreciate your videos!
Appreciate the kind word, and glad you like this content!
What an insightful video… you have such great teaching skills, it’s crazy. You HAVE to make a video on Delleuze’s work on cinema and movement!! Not only because it’s an amazing topic, but because next week I have a presentation on the topic at college and learning it from you would be very welcoming 😂😂😂
Greetings from Brazil! Keep up the awesome work
Thanks a lot, Hector! Glad you like this content. I probably won't be able to make a video on Cinema by next week tbh :D Best of luck for your presentation, though!
Love your videos pls more difference and rep stuff it’s a dousy
Wow your videos are really good, I immediately subscribed. If you don't mind, what I never really understood is how positive and reactive forces differ from Hegel's Dialectic? And what do you think of Badious criticism of Deleuze (Deleuze is a thinker of the One and Badiou is a thinker of multiplicities etc.)? Would make interesting videos. Keep up the good work!
Thank you, appreciate it!
Hegel's dialectics is directly opposed by Deleuze (in particular in chapter 1 of D&R if you want to have a look) on the basis of Deleuze's critique of representation, where he argues that Hegelian dialectics, for all its genius, still proceeds from the Platonic assumption that there are certain foundational principles (matter, mind, finiteness and the infinite in the case of Hegel) that are given in advance rather than synthesized. This makes for the "magic trick" that you see in all forms of Platonism.
As for Badiou, I (humbly) think he is wrong about Deleuze. I also know that some of Badiou's disciples, like Quentin Meillassoux (who is otherwise a brilliant thinker) still maintain that Deleuze is a hypostatic thinker. But the whole of Deleuze's philosophy consists precisely in a critique of the given in the form of the One, the subject, the material world, etc., so I don't know how they can maintain their critique without entertaining a serious misunderstanding of Deleuze's thought at the same time.
Œdipus adapts to adoption
Freud, afraid of frailty
❤️
the continued process of going away from and coming back to
What's the major difference between "D&R and A Thousand Plateaus"?