วีดีโอ

Thank you for excellent presentation! Helpful to see how much Laclau and Mouffe build on Foucault and Derrida.

Thanks for the video, it is pretty helpful. 10:26 i did not catch the name of the author, what is her/his/they name? 😮

Hallo, ich habe dich zflg gefunden. Liebe Grüße, Vitiko :)

Thank you so much, this was such a helpful video!

Thank you. Interesting about the "language has been granted too much power" because I was wondering how new materialists cope with the insights of the literary turn. I'll have to read that section.

Thank you, you just connected some very helpful philosophical dots for me.

hi im a design student, very interested in your videos and the subjects, however and i mean no offense the visuals within the videos can be worked upon. If you'd be interested id love to help out with that.

5:00 contingency

I have caught you mispronouncing 'phenomena' as 'phenonema' two times in this video, and in other videos as well 😊. By the way your videos are helpful indeed.

thanks

"Matter is not passive but has agency." I don't understand what's so "new" or "materialistic" about "new materialism." Why not just call it Pantheism or Animism? Philosophers and theologians have debated these questions for ages, with far more sophistication and metaphysical nuance. Why should settle with this hodge podge of feminism, new-agism and environmental ideology?

Du könntest ja auch ganz einfach und konstruktiv in Deutsch reden. Aber das hätte wohl nicht den beabsichtigten Klang! 😎

whats up with europoids and their passionless monotone rambling. hitler had more charisma.

Thank you, this is helpful! Could you kindly make a video on Gramscian and Neo-Gramscian?

A poststructuralist conversation: -Don't believe everything you see -Have you seen the Berlin Wall? -No -How do you know it exists? -Where is the Berlin Wall? -In Berlin -Where is Berlin located? -In Germany -That's what they want you to believe

Yes, you can not be sure a sofa is a sofa and not a horse! Brilliant interpretation of the world by a bunch of idiots!

Nice content you delivered

It is simple but excellent explanation. KABIR ALI former v. Lecturer University of Narowal Pakistan

Thank you for this lecture. Could you please provide the sources that you used for this introduction?

Nice review but the commentary needs to assume a more cross-cultural approach as it reaches a peak of ridiculousness when 'white' ideologues are criticized for creating and fostering gender inequalities and hegemonies.

Excellent video. Thanks for breaking this down :)

Please do more videos

Nice

its important to go beyond this dichotomie of modern (rational, realist-science) and the social constructivism branch of postmodernity and combine them again. But not in an dialectical fashion.

finally new video, thank you and good job

Hi there, I am currently writing a research using Laclau’s discourse theory. I have several questions and are you open to discussion through emails? Thank you!

Wow! I'm so glad you're back!!!

very helpful thanks

großartig!

I tried to listened to the end. Could not make it because of the background music that became an mental obstacle. Why irritating the music?????

Thank you for the video. (A constructive criticism, if you don't mind: I find the background "music" not only totally unnecessary but also annoying. Five minutes into your lecture, I stopped the video as I lost the battle with whatever those sounds/noises are.)

Thank you very much for your work! I would say it could help to the explanation if you put one or two particular cases for each concept that you present, in order to link the abstract ideas with the general experience of the audience, as a general rule of thumb to make the contents easier to understand. Justus Hartnack for instance does this (almost) the whole time in his History of philosophy.

Make easy to understand .Thank very very much.

Beautifully said.

Wonderful channel.

Thank you for this video

I am always attending your lecture and presentation that you are making on Anthropoliccal theories; and with this I truly want to express my grattitude to you with an hounarable appreciation. Having I said this I want to ask a question: can you clarify the difference between structuralism and poststructuralism well?

what

AWESOME

Thank you so much for this explanation it really helped me to get though HSS. What are your thoughts on Mouffe being labelled as a relativist?

Your explanation is boring.

please do more videos

Excellent. Clear. Can you help us to understand poststructuralism and poetry? With examples?

The only clips that I understand about poststructuralism so far. Very helpful, very much thanks Marie.

its been very helpful!!!!

Deleuzo-Guattarian poststructuralism goes against the basic assumption is that our world is constructed and ordered in discourse. In their view term "structure" illegitimately conflates several scales and deprives organisations (assemblages) of causal agency. In their _Anti-Oedipus_ structure becomes machine...

Clear and unstandable. You have just save a student .Thanks you.

who are you

As a PhD student What you think about language location force..?

Thank you so much. This is helping me in understanding my Theoretical Framework.