วีดีโอ

Yea, looksl ike, but it's a new stuff.

Yes, it's Unity. I used compute shader to run the physics on GPU.

Check my twitter, there's some vids from my 3d physics engine. But also I'm working on the new 2d physics engine. x.com/ZoldenGames

I used Unity. All the physics is done on compute shaders. UI, VFX and input is done on cpu side.

@@ZoldenGames Thanks, cool work!

@@borzonstudios8638 thank you)

I experimented with these simulations on an old laptop videocard. Modern cards can do million particles. But developers bet on better graphics rather than physics simulation in games. I might create another physics based game at some point.

@@ZoldenGames do you think with today cards we could achieve both good graphics and accurate complex fluid physics in real time? What about something as in the following video for example : th-cam.com/video/3Y_QTY4C08I/w-d-xo.html I think there is a certain amount of particles that today's gpus cannot handle in realtime, but I don't know what this limit is and what other visual features we should sacrifice to achieve. Maybe 2 high end gpus could do it but not 1 GPU, and programmers make games for PCs with 1 GPU which is the most common configuration

@@endyx2708 I think something like the water in the video you linked can be achieved, but with some optimisation. When realtime simulation is a limiting factor, something should be traded off, but still it can be quite realistic. For example: th-cam.com/video/huZ8UFcWqyg/w-d-xo.html In this game there's some liquid mechanics, along with general soft body deformation. It's an example of good optimisation, there's not that much particles used. Though, it's also a 5 years old game. Modern gpus would allow much more. Another example: th-cam.com/video/0EPWjmb6KfQ/w-d-xo.html I don't know if there's any more recent particle simulation based games. If there are they could afford much more particles these days, and still have capacity for nice rendering.

@@ZoldenGames in claybook there seem to be a very few amount of particles. They are smoothed, it seem to be something like metaballs. But to achieve realistic waves like in the previous video, you need maybe tens of millions of particles, which may need minutes or hours to render a few seconds at 60fps. I think we are style far to see that amount of particles in realtime video games.

@@endyx2708 Based on my experience with simulations, I'm inclined to expect that rtx 3090 is able to run a realtime simulation of 1 million interacting particles in 3d, to model a realistically looking water. It might consume all its computational power, but still it's possible. This can be combined with some cpu side physics, to have some kind of boat on that water, that the player could control, and make it a game. Some simple rendering could also be done in this scheme. So, if we take an extreme case of a million particles, it's still possible on the top card currently on the market. Next generation, the 40 series will probably be able to solve this with ease. But my point is that we don't have to either stick to extremes of a million particles or opposite extremes of 100 particles, like we've seen in Claybook. It's possible to simulate 3d water with 100K particles. It will still look great and could be used for gameplay mechanics, but it won't require the very top card. In my game some levels use 40K particles, and it gives a nice simulated world experience. And it works on 5-7 years old cards. So, simulated world with really good water, destructuability and soft bodies is totally doable on modern cards. The only problem here is that there will be some engineering efforts required to do all the coding, optimisation, cute rendering, gpu-cpu interaction, as well as game design to utilize all those physics in a functional way. It would take a small to mid studio to work for a year to create a game like this, it would cost one to few millions dollars. But market doesn't have examples of a physics based game to generate a profit worth risking for. So, no studios are attempting to create such product. But technically it's already possible. Maybe it's a quiestion of some indie enthusiast to do all the work and make a nice game, that makes millions, and then bigger studious could start investing in physics based gameplay research.

Well, on Steam. The video's description has the link.

Пока на паузе, работаю над другой игрой. Хотя скоро залью апдейт, а то на мощных видюшках она слишком быстро играется.

@@ZoldenGames Рад, что не забросил.

It's based on particle interaction, no hydrodynamics math involved. They stick together by the force modelling real particle to particle interactions.

It's a trivial heuristic based AI. Enemy tank is aware of the projectiles around it and he's trying to avoid being on the line the projectiles follow. And aiming is done by predicting where the player will be in a couple of seconds after launching the projectile. So it all is just a little bit of vector math.

@@ZoldenGames Cool ❤ usually its these simple mechanics that contribute to a bigger picture. This sort of predections I have seen in games like killing floor, of course any game with bullet physics uses this but in that game I noticed it.

Я пять лет работал в редакторе ск2, почти каждый день, но так и не достиг совершенства.

Поздравляю! Молодец, что не отступил и разобрался.

@@ZoldenGames спасибо большое, и за видео тоже

@@ZoldenGames "а как дальше?" - вопрос риторический ) родные мануалы на SC2 более недоступны, они на американском сервере, туда даже под прокси/впн не пускают. подскажи каким ресурсом лучше пользоваться для туториалов? их море, глаза разбегаются

@@redorcredorc8090 А что именно ты хочешь сделать? Я всю информацию получил на форуме sc2mapster.com Там почти на любой вопрос можно найти ответ, потому что его уже задали и ответили. Или спрашивать можно, публика там дружелюбная

It was DXT5

если руки не опускать и очень много времени и усилий приложить, то могут получиться невероятные вещи, редактор ск2 - мощная и гибкая штука

@@ZoldenGames я пытаюсь сделать спрайты из HOMM3 и вставить их по тому методу что ты показывал. Но я к сожалению нигде не могу найти туториал как правильно подготовить сами спрайты. Одни пишут что надо dds в dxt5 сохранять, другие за dxt3. Я попробовал оба способа, чет не получается. Может там есть какая-то фича о которой все знают, но не видят смысла про нее рассказывать? Carbot выложил много видео о своем моде, но никаких подробностей о том как он делал sprite sheet

для удобства, чтоб массивы создавать

@@ZoldenGames что бы легче было находить последний элемент? или я неправильно понял?

@@gwynbleinn просто чтоб размер массива знать, int-значение последнего элемента enum - количество элементов

@@ZoldenGames спасибо

Неа, я его сам использую)

Виктор Аргонов "2032"

С экономикой порядок. 5 видов ресурсов, возможность вкладывать их в шахты, чтобы увеличивать доход. Для подобных игр это уде довольно много. Но если ты о том, чтобы строить производство и из ресурсов делать что-то ещё, то я над этим думал. Мне самому цезарь 3 и lord of realms 3 очень нравятся, и я бы с удовольствием двигался в этом направлении. Но в ближайших планах пока доделать то, что есть. А там поглядим.

It is an old version, physics were indeed closer to cake then. But in the current version stuff's more solid. Here, for example: th-cam.com/video/0AQXhEa_P2M/w-d-xo.html

play.google.com/store/apps/details?hl=en-gb&id=com.Zolden.hallo_spaceboy_lite

Пока нигде, она ещё в разработке.