- 29
- 154 452
none
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2009
Championship Bridge D4Ep.5
There are 4 discs, each with 8 episodes. Let me know if I missed any!
มุมมอง: 5 054
วีดีโอ
D4Ep.4
มุมมอง 2.1K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Finishing out the last disc of this series. For a fun article about organized Bridge in this time period (1960s), check out vault.si.com/vault/1961/10/09/every-man-a-bridge-master
Championship Bridge D3Ep.7
มุมมอง 4.4K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Rubber Bridge play with slightly antiquated bidding.
Championship Bridge D3Ep4
มุมมอง 6K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Exciting Rubber Bridge play with commentary by Charles Goren
Championship Bridge D3Ep3
มุมมอง 4.6K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Dollars are on the line for these pro Rubber Bridge players
Classy. Everything in that first hand is relevant to current bridge.
It's interesting how things have evolved since the 60s in terms of sexism. The announcer routinely describes how pretty the pretty players are. This has a jarring effect when viewed from today's perspective. You never hear him talk about how handsome the men players are.
b schenken is also an exotic cook
Hmm they changed to Chicago scoring. and are now only playing 3 hands....
Strange line of play on the 3NT hand, why not win the first diamond and return the c9
Surprising number of bidding errors in this match on both teams. Were they drunk?
th-cam.com/video/cxSgsjE55I8/w-d-xo.htmlm26s commentry 😅
Я тут 😂😂😂
I wonder if Mr Ogust is the inventor of the Ogust convention in response to to weak twos
That’s who it is!
Very retro. They must have said Carol was beautiful 10 times. The culture has changed.
Leventritt played the 'Intra Finesse' many years before Chagas published it in the Bols tip
"Chico needed the money"
Appalling bidding on the KQJ to 8 Clubs ...by everyone....
Mad Marx Brothers bidding. Interesting 900 penalty !
17:50 If the Schenkens knew this was the last hand, and their only chance to win the match was by setting their opponents, then why not double? Then they win the match by putting them down two instead of three.
4 experts and 1 leads out of turn... pathetic
What a great game! Too bad its ageing out in the US, but so am I.
This show featured some excellent bridge players of the time, to be sure. However, one woman I would really have enjoyed watching is Agnes Gordon. She was a frequent partner of Eric Murray, who said of her: "Agnes never came close to touching a wrong card or making a questionable bid. Everyone who played with Agnes marveled at her perfection.".
Are the episodes really in the right order? The intro is different. Also the defending team are not the winners of the previous uploaded episode.
On a laptop, Ive been able to follow in order by watching the fist episode in each season, with the next episode being on top of the menu to the right. After season one (ep1, Chico) it's D2ep*, D3ep* and D4ep*.
This one is glorious
Wait, is Mary Jane Farell pretty? I wish they would tell me.
Format change on this episode… mid season..
Not to mention Alex Dreier gained about 50 pounds. I wonder if this was a split season or something.
For world class champion players, the bidding on the last deal was atrocious! Any experienced competent partnership would reach 6 spades easily!
Thanks for the memories ,My Aunt Lenas favorite show❤ R I P Aunt Lena John
Grainy, black and white, but for a bridge player, probably every bit as interesting as it ever was, perhaps moreso because of the presence of names like Chico Marx, Gerber, and Goren.
Well it got better.. thanks
Thanks but on my cell phone I cannot follow anything.. I can barely see the cards, could not hear the contract.
Every Saturday morning it was Spaß Beiziete when the cartoons finished and the Goran show started
Eli Culbertson preceded Goren and you needed 2.5 tricks to open.
Why world class players would NOT bid 6 Spades on that first hand is hard to imagine!
That would be a very tough slam to find even with modern bidding, and by comparison to modern bidders, they were probably flying blind. They've somehow got to diagnose both the diamond void and the fact that, with a 10-card fit, the odds of picking up spades for 1 loser are much better than would normally be implied by a missing A and Q.
@@sashacooper9326 If the diamond cue bid were followed by cue bids confirming first round control in the side suits, I agree that the concern would be on trump suit quality. Key card Blackwood asking for possession of the trump queen did not exist then, so bidding a confident 6 Spades would not happen. Here they are kind of "flying blind" so probably better to remain at what has to be a certain 4 Spades plus whatever overtricks are available. Good point! Thanks, I have to agree!
@@tuxtommy69 Even if they'd had RKCB, the answer to 'do you have the trump queen?' would probably have been 'no'. Today if responder had shown 4+ spades with her raise, south could recognise that the 10+ card fit was as good as the trump queen, but I suspect with their methods responder was only showing 3+.
Very enjoyable. Always wanted to learn how to play
Amazing how our culture has changed in the last 50 years! Female players are casually described as "pretty" or "lovely" on Championship Bridge, which if it were said today, would sound jarring and sexist to most people. And when she succeeds with the lead from xx of hearts against 3nt, the only killing lead, it is attributed to her "woman's intuition", not skill and knowledge of bridge defense.
It is interesting to note that playing a heart from dummy after discarding the losing club would allow the contract to make. Is it logical to play like this? I must admit that I would be assuming, based on the double, that the HK lead is from KQ and possibly others. That makes a heart from dummy unattractive. In spite of the result, I consider the HK lead to be pretty crazy. It could well be the only lead to allow the contract to make.
The HK lead was aggressive. He wanted to make an aggressive lead because he knew he needed to beat the contract by 2 tricks. If his partner has the queen of hearts as he did, he was likely thinking the SK was in declarers hand and they could score AQ of spades, A of clubs, Q of hearts, and ruff a heart with the 8 of spades for 5 tricks and a 2 trick set of the 4 spades contact.
I just love TV programs from way back when, their quality will last in eternity!
That's John Gerber of the Gerber convention!
0:48 This was Chico’s last appearance on Television he died in 1961 a year after this
On the last deal Mr. Harkavy should have tried the hearts first. He needed only a normal heart break for his contract (or singleton Jack or Jxxx at Mr. Landy). He has 9 tricks: 2 spades, 5 hearts, 1 diamond and 1 club. I'm surprised neither the declarer nor Mr. Goren noticed this. :)
With IMP scoring that is absolutely correct! However, here he needed 11 tricks to score enough to win the match (this was the fourth & last hand). Going down as he did had the same effect on the final result as making 3NT.
He had to make 5NT in order to win the rubber
@20:37 "Mr. Bridge" Charles Goren states that the odds favor 4 missing cards of a suit to split 3-1. NOT TRUE! Odds slightly favor a 2-2 split.
50% 3-1, 41% 2-2, 10% 4-0 (after rounding)
@@danielchiverton4168 Whoops! You are right! 2 missing cards tend to split 1-1 more than 2-0. That was what I was thinking but mixed up 4 missing with 2 missing! Thanks for clarification!
Like the sign-off: " Aces to all of you!"
On the last deal, when Mr. Foerstner rebid 3C, he created a game-force (his hand isn't worth it, but that's what he did). 3C is a strong bid implying five hearts, and Mr. Harkavy, holding the two unbid suits under control, should immediately take charge of the auction by bidding 4NT. (Yes, he has 3 club losers, but his partner bid the suit strongly.) The moment Foerstner confirms the club ace, Harkavy could ask for Ks. Just one K in Foerstner's hand is disappointing, and Harkavy signs off in 6H. 12 tricks are there if Foerstner plays for a 2-2 club split. It is hard to believe Goren had not seen the slam, but he made no comment, I suppose, to avoid humiliating his guests.
"Chico, you have exactly three seconds to produce another queen." lol
SPOILER! Ivan dies in 1967 aged 43.
His nickname wasn't really "cheek-o", it was "chick-o" cos he liked the ladies.
I also thought that, but he didn't correct them even before the show. I guess he responded to both.
This appearance was Chico Marx's last public appearance (1960). He died the next year.
Wonderful to see these games - thank you
Kwong should double the 4H hand. A likely set and nothing to lose. It cost him the match.
Interesting to see Okumeff. He's mentioned in Hamman's "At the Table" as co-owner and operator of an LA bridge club that developed many top players, including Hamman (and Soloway and Kantar and others). Okuneff also codified the rules of an "Oh Hell" variant popular with bridge players - play begins with four cards per hand, goes up to 13 and remains there for four deals. The trump suit is chosen by the highest bidder (or the first one if there's a tie). No trumps can also be chosen and that doubles the score for the hand.
Tim Holland would become much better known in the 1970s for backgammon, not golf or bridge. He wrote several popular books on the game and won some major tournaments.
Bridge is a game for old guys… and its useless
You're wrong on all three counts. It's not a game for the old, or for guys, and it's not useless. Congratulations.
Mostly old ladies play in local clubs in the US and Canada, middle aged people in Regionals, sponsored younger people in Internationals. Very popular in The Netherlands, Italy, China and India. Faster than Chess, same difficulty yet no computer has beat the best of Bridge players.
Ha ha ! call the director !