วีดีโอ

The R6 mkII is much better at shooting wildlife and sports. The camera is faster than the original R6. It tracks movement better than the original version. If you shoot static subjects then the R6 does an excellent job.

Good work!

Just constructive criticism, but there's an awful buzz/feedback to your audio.

Mediocre autofocus, sub par sensor, awful buffer. But it's only $1400. You get what you pay for. Mine sits on the shelf now because of poor performance issues.

키스40분볼게요

Sell it awful camera wish I never got it.

I'm trading up from a DSLR Canon 5D Mark iii. I'd like to get the canon r6 (mk ii) but the price diff (for used) with RF lens is $1,000 more than the R! I'd primarily use it for portrait/landscape photography R, but I'm also interested in street photography so would the R6 be better for that? Also, need to look into firmware updates with the R camera. I also heard about green tint in raw files. Recommendations for correcting in camera or in post?

All of the primes were available for the M mount. I have the 16mm and love it. To bad Canon dropped the M series cameras.

I am confused between r8 and eos r ....bec i heard many ppl saying that canon r8 has overheating issues....so i am thinking of buying eos R in 2024.....and even it has better resolution ...so what do you suggest? Should i buy r? Or r8...

I like it but the only issue it’s 1-memory card I wish they did 2-memory cards

I've been most interested in the 18-50 f2.8 - both as a walk-around replacement for my current EF 24-70 f2.8L II and as a successor to the old EF-S 17-55 f2.8. Its image quality appears to be on a par with those while its size and weight are less than the R7's 18-150 kit lens.

2:28 have noticed this it's not perfect but the hit/keeper rate compared to my 5Div is massive (3 to 7 times) particularly with birds in flight so given its price I'm OK with that (and lets not talk about the hit rate improvement over my 60D and 90D beyond saying it's an order of magnitude about 15 times) This camera was originally purchased exclusively to use with my EF L series telephoto primes which are so old (early 1990's) they don't have any sort of IS so the, on the whole, improved auto focus features over my 60D/90D/5Div bodies and IBIS has given these 2 lenses a whole new lease on life. Since then i have used it with various canon and sigma telephoto zooms - using suggested settings the Sigma 150-500 on the R7 is getting a significantly improved keeper rates over the DSLRs Hell even my 2001 Bigma 50-500 has been dragged out for the first time in over 15 years and works well (though sensor way out resolves it). And the old film era 85 f1.8 and 100 f2 on this camera? - amazing - they were/are great on the 5Div but even better on the R7 - they do not seem to suffer from the fact they under resolve the sensor and their one noticeable flaw (CA) is usually easily fixed in post

I am getting an R6 Mii, but I am going to keep my R. I need it as a second shooter. Glad the R is still getting love out here.

I am still happy with my EOS R, after 5 years and 10's of thousands of photos and many videos. But I would not buy one again in 2024. Five years have made a lot of difference in cameras. Unless you are constrained to buy one because of lack of money, buy an R6 or R8. Everything is better, faster and will make your life much easier than futzing around with a five year old R.

I have a fuji xh2 on the way, but might send it back for this, can't justify spending £2000 on an Apsc body only.

no telephoto lenses :(

Omg you're soooo boring!

I went from a 5D Mk II to the R6. It was like going from a dependable mate to a brilliant psycho. With the R6 it seems Canon listened to every photographer and gave them a button. And then said just set them to what you like. The end result is a camera that has no readily identifiable logic. It’s a hot mess. The Canon menu system is not fit for purpose any more. It needs a total rethink to deal with the complexity video brings to the machine. More of the same is confusing, maddening, fiddly and panic inducing. Then it fried itself. I was given a Blackmagic Pocket to try while the Canon was being rebuilt. It reminded me how good it feels to have a camera that is brilliant at doing one thing. Controls are where you need them, its design is not split into compromises. I gave the R6 another half a year. But I so missed the feeling of comfort I got from the 5D MkII and BMPCC - machines designed to do one job really well. I paid a Canon technician to try to help me connect to the R6, set it to my likings. But nah. It still hit me with gotchas and useless footage. So much footage junked due to the R6 getting it wrong. CLog is not nice to work with, I called it "clog". I'd had enough of the personality disorder. So I sold it. The R sounds like it could be just the machine. I dont care about the video. Fewer buttons is a bonus. For video no IBIS is also a bonus. I love waist high shooting using a touch screen. I'm keen.

thanks for the video, I've been super close to switching to sony, but now wondering. still havent bought a second camera for my r6ii, you think the r7 is worth buying to take advantage of the wide angle wide aperture primes completely missing from the full frame line up? seems so counter productive to put a wide angle on an apsc and telephoto on my ff. super frustrating situation

They say it's the same sensor as the 5D IV. I used them simultaneously, and the R was always definitely much softer with perfect focus, too. As well as, the R had magenta tinge to it in many scenarios. The IQ in the 5D IV is much better in my opinion.

I bought my R6 because Canon had it refurbished for $1799.00 (USA) and I think that the R6mk2 is probably the best camera on the market.. Hate to have both as they are similar.. We will see, lol. I prefer the 20 or 24mp id perfect for my line of work which is mostly weddings and models. The R5 is just such huge files to work with and store..

I love Sigma Art lenses! Some of my very favorite, even better than Canon imo..

Were you using an ND filter on some of those?

Very cool!

its better than my 80d for low low light situations. I can use my 80d for wildlife

I don't use the thumb slider. What a waste of space!

do you think the 24mp newer cameras with same sensor size collect more light since the pixels are ikely larger?

I bet the couple loved this. Nice work.

I shoot at 3200 iso quite frequently and I find no issue honestly! 😅

I would like to know if this lens has a factor of 1.6 on the Canon R7 and is converted to 28-56?

I use my 14-35 RF on this camera and I love it. It’s close to half the diagonal of the format at 14mm, similar to the great classics like the Leica 21mm, the Hasselblad SWC, 38mm, and the 165mm angulon on 8x10.

This is a powerful combination. I have mine adapted with the Meike drop in VND, usually with a CPL though. This and the older Sigma 17-50 f2.8 with the R7 is a great combination too. The later is arguably a tad sharper.

Good composition bro, too slow for TH-cam or IG. 4-6 secs max, add b roll to set scene and 30fps a few times in between, clean.

I use the R6M2 with the intention of selling my R6. I wind up keeping both. I shoot weddings and events. The original R6 renders portraits beautifully with slightly warmer colors the R6m2 is sharper I love ❤both. Btw this is a great practical review

I only miss three things, joystick, ibis and dual memory cards, but otherwise I definitely don't regret having it.

Thanks for your review. I'm on a tight budget and want to buy a Canon FF mirrorless + a 24-105 4F. I am hesitating between R and R6, there are three things that make me doubt: 1-The small information dial that the R has, I find interesting (I guess you can live without it). 2-Doesn't the body construction of the R6 look like a "toy"? 3-I wonder if the 20 Mg will be enough for advertising photography. My intention is to use it for many types of photos (landscape, children, still lifes, maybe some videos, animals...). Any suggestions as an R6 Mkii owner? Thanks again!

Your review helped me to decide to buy a used R (with only a 2,000 shutter count!) for $1,000. I must say that I was immediately stunned by the EVF and the back screen! Then, when I downloaded the files and processed the photos… YIKES! What a camera… thanks for your comments.

The af on mine is terrible love my r7 r6 isn't bad ether.

You can do a comparison between the R , RP and R8 as it is some what many viewers are eager to know whether which one to pick in terms of for video purpose , for still photo , or both purpose with real life example. Great video for R ! Hopefully to see more.

Why not if it worked last year it will work still

I use this camera as my only camera. The files are demanding, sure…but it gives great opportunity for cropping if you work with kiddos who don’t like to sit still. I haven’t used it with sigma lenses, but with a RF 24-70. I just haven’t seen anything worth spending the $ on in the same price point. That’s what gets me. I want the r6m2 but there’s no way I’m dropping 2500 on a new camera at the pricing they have now

This was great the EOS R is my main camera and my first full frame. I have no complaints and no regrets buying this camera

I got this lens because of all the praise I've seen. My Canon R7 is just waiting for it and the adapter, I'm so excited to test it and just play around. I see you have 2 photoshoot videos with this combo, I'll go watch both of them to see what I can expect :D

Is IBIS works with sigma 18-35? I heard latest firmware blocked IBIS with third party lens.

Hi, nice video! I have this lens since 2016 and it is my go to lens on my 70D. I might be considering going with R7/R10 at some point due to the massively better AF on the new R models. Do you think the R10, with 24 MP, would be a better choice than R7 (32,5 MP) regarding image quality with this lens?

Love my Canon f1.8! Thanks..