วีดีโอ

the stretta section is the best part in this interpretation

th-cam.com/video/gKjqB_SPWBI/w-d-xo.html

The stretta was just pure goosebumps

Questa pianista è incredibile, sia dal punto di vista interpretativo che dal punto di vista tecnico! 💖💖💖💖💖

Wow! ❤❤❤❤❤

Wow! ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

bro who is butchering tf out of the revised version ☠☠☠

how do you practice those runs?? i’m learning the cadenza and can’t get them quite right

top 3 PC all time

This is the best interpretation I've heard in a long time. That final part is wow...stunning.

whonny jang lmao is that like "zhong xina"?

Браво, Алексей Султанов! Потрясающий пианист!!!

The original cadenza wouldn’t make much sense with the revised work, because it uses elements from the original orchestration which Rachmaninov discarded, such as the stepwise four-note quaver descent.

He broke a string at 1.56. Too much power. I do not really like it

cette virtuosité m'effraie,m'inquiète aussi ,sentiments qui m'occupent tout entier et m'empêchent d'apprécier la musique elle-même,malheureusement.

Hands down the best interpretation

Conventional (it's an insult) performance. Spectacular fingers, of course.

1:45 my fugueing god

Wow

Such immense technique and difficulty in this piece

3:35

Stupidly too fast !!

Simply phenomenal!

Jesus..

Too fast!!

i like pianists who play like they want

Thw stretta sounds like a cello string section going nuts in a symphony

I can't believe what I'm hearing, how do you get to this level of improvisation

Pogorelich is not just pianist, he is an artist as well!

Pogorelic was certainly pushing himself in this one - this is an impossible tempo (even for Pogorelic), a few places lose some of their magic at this breakneck speed. That said, his Stretta is an absolute marvel, never heard it so explosive (it's up a notch even from Berman or Cziffra), and somehow it is still crisp and clean - that's some truly transcendental technique right there. Too fast for what I'd subjectively prefer, but still highly enjoyable. The rest of the interpretation is also stupendous, but the sheer speed and the ensuing consequences end up becoming a distraction for me.

Young Pogorelich. Astounding Artistry

It felt like it was being played with an orchestra.

Beautiful❤

Sounds like one of chopin's scherzi

This is one of those “just because you can doesn’t mean you should” type of performances. The technique displayed here is absolutely awesome-inspiring…but the end result is a brutal, harsh, rushed, mad dash, where much of the harmonic and melodic ideas are brushed past in a display of virtuosity. Those descending alternating chords have some great progressions in them that are a central motif and part of the melodic idea, but he just breezes through them. The ending Stretto is such a great march like build up, and again a melodic idea, but here it’s just breezed past with no consideration. And interesting, the climax of the piece with those repeated incessant and insistent octaves lacks power in large part because he’s already playing at full gusto from the beginning, so when he finally gets there, there’s nothing more to give and no place higher to go. I really prefer a performance that is slower and more thoughtful, building to the big central section, and with some restraint before the stretto. We have to remember the idea of “appassionata” was not Liszt’s, bur rather a subtitle given by Busoni. Liszt did not title études 2 and 10. But even so, even if it were actually called Appassionata, there’s a difference between appassionata and patetico. This is impressive, but I wouldn’t want to hear it again and it doesn’t have the effect I think it could have beside just making you go “wow”.

literally, this interpretation, make me mad.

Overall good performance! Although sounds kinda harsh

车祸 弦乐组的d音，是从74号后7小节的第二拍正拍开始的。而钢琴的d音，是从74号后8小节的第一拍后半拍开始的，时值为一拍。也就是：弦乐组的d音理应比钢琴的d音早一拍半演奏，并且需要同时结束，然后同时演奏74号后8小节的第二拍后半拍a音。 那么现在，弦乐组非常明显的出现了拖拍现象，滞后于钢琴大约一个半小节（即三拍）的时长。可以明显看到指挥在第二拍的起手动作放慢拖长了很久。所以，无庸置疑是指挥的肆意处理导致了这种现象。 间插段，78号及后四小节的弦乐间奏。听听视频中的弦乐组，大概只有一两把小提琴混过，而在舞台上的演奏者此时很难听见如此微弱又没有节奏重拍的间插段。演奏者需要在78号后四小节的第二拍进入尾声，仔细看视频，同样可以看到演奏者和指挥的手势是严丝合缝的。而且尾声中打击乐与铜管的节奏与钢琴是一致的，弦乐组却分道扬镳了。指挥的锅非常明显。不能甩锅给钢琴。

dreams

Am crying now😢

Much too fast, rendering most of it meaningless . A most unmusical performance

This performance sounds far too scrambled. Pogorelich does not really find the lyrical line; the music needs more space. It may be a feat to play the stretta like that, but not a particularly musical feat. I had to turn to Tiffany Poon's performance for a corrective. Hers rivals that of Cziffra. In the hands of Tiffany Poon the piece is revealed as great music, whereas with Pogorelich it appears as a showcase. th-cam.com/video/f-fN8_YK1GI/w-d-xo.html

"who needs arpeggios when you have two huge hands"

Lo studio 10 non ha titolo

That was the best 10th etude I've heard so far🚀

This recording was my introduction to Simon Barere. What a glorious memory it is, going back to that first time when I heard him play one of my most beloved pieces of music. It inspired me to start learning it as well back then. I don't even care if the audio sounds old. I still get the strong sensation of being in the crowd who were fortunate enough to experience this in person. Such ecstasy...

1:27 an improvised fugue, wow!

thanks :) I used it to compare. I like the 1913 version better

The stretta part sounds like an absolute machine gun. Stunning

the multiple climaxes of 1812 overture sound great. can't believe none of them made the list. also, what is number 3, I can't find the start of it.