Retro Drive-thru
Retro Drive-thru
  • 19
  • 87 917
First generation Pentium 4 1400MHz vs Pentium III-S 1400MHz
We are looking at one of the first Pentium 4s, the 1400Mhz from 2000.
We couple it with a MSI MS-6339, AGP Pro - RDRAM combo.
The graphics card used for this project is the GeForce 2 GTS.
We're aiming to see how does the Pentium 4 compare with the previous generation of CPUs.
Is it able to overpower a Pentium III-S running at 1400Mhz? Or a Tualatin Celeron running at 1400Mhz?
Contents:
00:00 - Intro
00:08 - The parts
03:33 - Assembly
05:18 - P4 Information
06:19 - Hijacking the Retro Blue Build
06:43 - P4 vs P3 vs Celeron (1400 Battle)
08:06 - Games
10:48 - Introducing the Pentium 4 1700Mhz
11:08 - P4 vs P3 vs Celeron
11:52 - Introducing the Pentium 4 1900Mhz
12:49 - Graphics card bottleneck, possible solutions
13:20 - Redoing the tests and issues during the making of the clip
14:08 - Conclusions
15:41 - Games
มุมมอง: 7 524

วีดีโอ

Building a Windows 98 PC with Pentium III-S 1400Mhz and Radeon 8500
มุมมอง 11K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
I'm taking a little break from the 'big projects' and I am building myself a retro PC for playing Windows 98 games. As I originally got this PC over a year ago from a friend I decided to look into it and continue his plan of only using blue components. Contents: 00:00 - Intro 00:27 - The parts 05:27 - Restoring the fan and radiator 06:09 - Assembly 08:18 - Powering on the system 08:38 - BIOS 09...
Exploring the early PCI-E cards on Windows 98
มุมมอง 17K7 หลายเดือนก่อน
We are looking at one of ASRock oddities from the mid 2000. A socket 478 that supports PCI-Ex. What better use we have for it than checking Windows 98's compatibility with PCI Express graphics cards? Contents: 00:00 - Intro 00:09 - The parts 05:27 - Assembly 06:20 - BIOS 07:01 - The Drivers 10:04 - Graphics benchmarks 10:46 - Game benchmarks 11:30 - Gaming on the x850XT 15:51 - x300SE Informati...
Crossfire on socket 939 is not for the faint of heart
มุมมอง 12K9 หลายเดือนก่อน
We are looking at one of the early solution for building an ATI Radeon Crossfire. The components used in this clip are: DFI LanParty RDX 200, AMD Opteron 185, Gecube x1950 Pro, HIS x1950 XTX, Western Digital 150Gb Velociraptor. Contents: 00:00 - Intro 00:11 - The parts 03:24 - Assembly 04:39 - Hardware Issues 06:54 - The Drivers 10:27 - The competitor 11:25 - Raid 0 12:23 - Information 13:15 - ...
Benchmarking the 'VIAGRA' motherboard
มุมมอง 3.6Kปีที่แล้ว
We are investigating the PCCHIPS M585LMR 'VIAGRA' Motherboard with a Cyrix 6x68 P150 (MMX-less) CPU. Contents: 00:00 - Intro 00:08 - The motherboard 01:16 - The IBM 6x86 P150 CPU 02:00 - Assembly 03:21 - The BIOS 04:07 - CPU-Z 05:02 - Sandra 99 07:20 - Super PI 07:39 - Final Reality 08:11 - 3DMark 99 Max 08:25 - Test Drive 4 (1997) 08:53 - Need for Speed 2 (1997) 09:28 - Quake 2 (1997) 09:45 - ...
PCI-E vs AGP vs PCI
มุมมอง 6Kปีที่แล้ว
We are comparing the 3 type of graphics cards available in the early 2000. The components used in this clip are: AsRock AliveDual e-SATA2, Athlon X2 5600 , Generic 512Mb module DDR2, Asus 6200 PCI-ex, Palit 6200 AGP, Zotac 6200 PCI, XFX 6200 AGP, Western Digital 250Gb, Corsair 750W PSU. The Second Sidequest puts AGP agains PCI-ex and looks at the Gainward's 7900GS and the Sapphire HD3850. Conte...
Every Need For Speed dashboard camera and the Sense of Speed in the series
มุมมอง 420ปีที่แล้ว
We are looking the games in the Need for Speed series to see how the dashboard of the car has evolved (or disappeared) over the years. I will be re-building 4 of my previous PCs for this task. WARNING: PHOTOSENSITIVITY/EPILEPSY SEIZURES Contents: 00:00 - Intro 00:14 - The builds 01:02 - My 2002-2004 build 02:58 - Road and Track presents: The Need for Speed (1996) 03:44 - The Socket A ISA replac...
Need for Speed from 1 to Porsche on Voodoo2 SLI
มุมมอง 8Kปีที่แล้ว
We're building a '99 PC in order to play the first 5 Need for Speed games and compare software mode with the 3dfx mode. The components used in this clip are: Asus K7M, AMD Slot A K7 550Mhz, Diamond Viper V550, Diamond Voodoo 2 8Mb, Quantum Fireball 10.2Gb, Creative AWE64 Gold (CT4390), Corsair 750W PSU, Unknown 64Mb SDRAM PC133 Memory module. Contents: 00:00 - Intro 00:16 - The components 03:58...
Upgrade from Windows 1 to Windows 11 on a Pentium 4
มุมมอง 6Kปีที่แล้ว
Upgrade from Windows 1 to Windows 11 done on real hardware, following the 9x path. WARNING: PHOTOSENSITIVITY/EPILEPSY SEIZURES If you, or anyone in your family has an epileptic condition or has had seizures of any kind, this video may trigger a seizure. Some areas of the clip were speed up 80x(the Windows 11 installation period) and may alternate flashing bright lights known to induce condition...
Best Retro Operating System by comparison
มุมมอง 7502 ปีที่แล้ว
Best Retro Operating System by comparison
Windows 98 on unsupported hardware!?
มุมมอง 9K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Windows 98 on unsupported hardware!?

ความคิดเห็น

  • @joaoc_PT
    @joaoc_PT 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Saphire 3850 are also blue ;)

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That's blue allright, but I wouldn't dare put it on a pentium 3.

  • @joaoc_PT
    @joaoc_PT 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    perfect motherboard for a mini retro pc.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It is good for a mini pc but it's a bit unfortunate that it only has one pci and one ISA. It should have at least another pci or another ISA.

  • @RenanSpolon
    @RenanSpolon 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I thought that perhaps your equipment could spontaneously combust due to the size of the conflicts between files that this could generate, but the walk was completed successfully. 👑

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The cpu was also running at 5ghz since windows 2000. I was kind of fearing the same thing. The fun thing about this upgrade is that many of the applications found in the early versions of windows were still functional in windows 7 32 bit. I was following quite a few applications since windows 3.1 but time didn't allow me to include them all in this clip. I'm still considering other clips with upgrade from 1 to 11. A kind of need to do this for an AMD cpu as well.

  • @downundergarage6968
    @downundergarage6968 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Use geforce 3 ti 500.. not many pple use it and it will be fun to see how it performs and i dont have it in my colection.. but gave 2 and 4. Lol

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I think that is my favorite too, but I feel that the geforce 4 ti 4400 is soo underated. For now I think the geforce 4 is the winner according to the votes, but I have something really special for the geforce 3 ti 500. Still I will use the geforce 3 for some tests in this series.

  • @downundergarage6968
    @downundergarage6968 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hey what did you use for fps overlay on win 98se. Thx

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is actually windows xp used in this clip and I'm using msi afterburner. For win98 you can use fraps but you may need to look for an older version like 1.9 or 1.6

  • @NintenloupWolfFR
    @NintenloupWolfFR 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    They still sold PCI video cards that late because a lot of OEMs still only gave you a couple of PCI slots on their lower end machines. So the only way to upgrade was a PCI graphics card.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I never knew that, that explains why there is a 610 and 710 nvidia pci.

  • @chelsona2574
    @chelsona2574 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    ha! i found it! i have one of these too!!... no drivers tho :(

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I think you can find some drivers on the wayback machine. I also found a working bios.

  • @KegRaider
    @KegRaider 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    @4:20 missed opportunity. "There Terminators will be in the back". God I hated building this generation P4. We sold AMD's 20:1 because of the overpriced RDRAM.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      :))) the terminators will be back, I also have a p4@1400 socket 478 that will be part of this series...no doubt in the tests rdram performs faster than sdram but I think they only kept it up until ddr 333mhz.

  • @AsurmenHandOfAsur
    @AsurmenHandOfAsur 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Awesome build ! I have some parts for an all purple build but need to find or paint case for it !

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes, you can resort to painting. The guy that originally sold me the blue build had the psu painted blue, I never knew that. A purple build would be awesome, I think ECS make a lot of purple motherboards and I also think that creative in their early days had purple graphics cards (Palit too). There's also a rather new WD purple. But I doubt that you are going to find any purple cpus or ram. Good luck with your build.

  • @MarcoGPUtuber
    @MarcoGPUtuber หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you have access to soldering equipment or someone who can help you solder stuff, I have blue PCI Sockets I could send.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi Marco, that's pretty generous, and I may take you up for the offer in a couple of years. For now I got 2 blue voodoo 2s that need a lot of work. I also got a blue hard-drive and I'm trying to get some blue radiator sdram@150mhz. I'm also moving everything into a blue-er case so I have my hands full for now.

    • @MarcoGPUtuber
      @MarcoGPUtuber หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@retrodrive-thru47 Well, if we're not in a rush, once I have time to extract them from the board, I could send them and you can deal with them at your own convenience, to make your system just a bit more blue.

  • @XenonG
    @XenonG หลายเดือนก่อน

    Back then, we had an ECS motherboard socket 423 with a Willamette Pentium 4 ( don't remember the clock speed ). Rambus? Hah! Nothing that exotic, it was SDR for us. Had tons of issues exporting miniDV to VCD or DVD. A few years later we upgraded to an Abit mobo, socket 939 Athlon 64 3200+ with an NVIDIA GeForce 6600, it was more than a monumental upgrade...

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Back then I had an AMD, nothing as exotic as an Intel. The P4 were extremely expensive, and I only used it for games on the integrated SIS graphics card (equivalent to a sis 305) and a gf4 mx440 a couple of years later. I also upgraded to a sk 939 much later and by 2006 I had an agp 6600gt to keep it company. Indeed ... that system was flying.

  • @edbls9282
    @edbls9282 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, there is a NETGEAR FA311 Rev-D2 network card in blue closer to the color of your motherboard. I have one in my possession. Thanks for your video.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for the tip. I'm currently looking into getting 2 blue voodoo 2 cards and maybe a different sound card and I already got a new blue case. So in a future video I'm going to upgrade this build. I'm also considering replacing the cpu with a less powerfull p3s maybe a 1266mhz so I can free up the 1400 for other projects.

  • @xDJxGNOMx
    @xDJxGNOMx หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you live in the EU? I can a donate a CRT to you if you want one. I have a 17" CRT as a spare that i don't need. Also 4:3 is definitely the way to go. Because of TH-cams strong compression the quality drops anyways, so having the original aspect ratio instead of a stretched out picture is always appreciated.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, I kind of feel 4:3 is the way to go with these clasic games too. Although i have been playing NFS Porsche with the wide screen option from the graphics menu since I can remember because I felt it gave me less screen to focus on and I can take in more information. I live in Romania so EU, but I would only get a CRT if I can pick it up in person. I also picked one last week , a Philips 109B5 in a decently good shape so I will investigate that one for the next couple of weeks. Thank you very much for the offer.

  • @ufukpolat3480
    @ufukpolat3480 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The X800/850 and X1800/1900 cards had a specific model named Crossfire edition which had a different connector as input coming from a regular X8xx/1xxx card's video output. It then merged these frames with the ones generated on the CF card and output them as single image. I remember buying the CF card for the X1900XTX as it was in stock and cheaper.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, I have seen those too. If I wanted to be 100% period correct I should have used the x850 with that crossfire cable you mentioned, it was even described in the manual for the motherboard. Unfortunately those cards are hard to find so I had to use the x1950. I think the mechanism for merging frames is similar for both methods with external cable(you mentioned) and what we see in the clip. I think there's also a chip on the motherboard that controls the synchronization of the cards.

    • @ufukpolat3480
      @ufukpolat3480 หลายเดือนก่อน

      For some youtube reason I can't directly respond to your comment but here it goes. You're right, the cards were, even back in the day quite rare as very few people had reason to buy them because a crossfire setup was very expensive. $1100 for two cards and crossfire motherboards were even less available on the AMD front ironically ss Nvidia dominated the motherboard space with their chipsets.

  • @mrobinson9297
    @mrobinson9297 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    that microstuttering i think is caused by the video ram being refreshed with new data from the hdd. something something interrupts and latency and blocks of ram.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So a SSD would be reccomended? I did use a raid0 for this system and I kind of felt that the raid was on the limit actually bottlenecking the hard drives themselves. I guess that using a Ssd would not greatly increase the transfer rate but it would reduce the access time to 0ms.

    • @mrobinson9297
      @mrobinson9297 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@retrodrive-thru47 i would try an ssd for exactly that reason. better access times. raid might be a bit much. its just more interrupts and such, but i could be wrong ;) i think its a limitation of the computers of the day. i was just a kid when these systems were in common use. so take it with a grain of salt. i think the micro stuttering is the microsecond or two where the video card is loading more data into ram and has to issue an interrupt to the cpu, and the cpu then has to issue a couple to setup the data transfer into the video card. the system is in a lock state for a microsecond or two while all these pieces of hardware acknowledge interrupts and setting up dma and whatnot. this is me theorizing. i dont think anything can stop that micro stutter as its a part of the system and game programming. this is still one of the smoothest ive seen though. in the 90s that pause would have been where the cdrom or hdd were accessed to load that data. that specific action always led the system to a tiny little pause as all those interrupts , busses, and hardware did their thing.

  • @b2o7_url
    @b2o7_url 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video, thank you!

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're welcome, glad you like it.

  • @b2o7_url
    @b2o7_url 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finally some good content on TH-cam

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you, I hope there's more to come.

  • @NinjaContravaniaManX
    @NinjaContravaniaManX 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was working at a German computer franchise store back then and one monday, we got a big delivery from HQ, including pallets of Athlon XP and Pentium 4 systems. The Intel systems came with much slower SDRAM cause RDRAM aka "Rambus" was too expensive for the mainstream market. The Athlons already had DDR, which wasn't quite as fast as Rambus, but MUCH faster than SDRAM. Needless to say, the Athlon systems absolutely smoked the Pentiums and on top of that, were much cheaper. So my boss (total douchebag) held a meeting, telling us "I know those Intel system suck, but we're supposed to sell them. Just tell the customers something about "intel inside", better compatibility, efficiency, they don't know the difference..." - which of course, was a huge load of BS, but okay... you're the boss, whatever you say! It was the time when PCs started to become mainstream and people wanted to connect to this "internet thing". Grandpas, housewives and kids who just wanted to play Counterstrike bought their first PC from us this week. But even those inexperienced people quickly realized how bad those systems were. The next Monday, customers brought their Intel systems back one after another, yelling at us, calling us scammers and what not... it was brutal and I don't even blame them. I remember as soon as the shop closed, I went to the bar across the street and got blackout drunk in record time. On a Monday. When my gilfriend at the time came home, she found me passed out in bed with my clothes still on, mumbling something about processors and hard drives in my sleep... not a good time! Shortly after that, the franchise went out of business. Thank god...

  • @RuruFIN
    @RuruFIN 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Willamette was crap. Northwood-C was the first good P4.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, that's what most of the people agree on. Personally I like them all good or bad, they are 20 years history at this point and I feel privileged to get them up and running one more time. (I had an AMD back then so I really can't complain).

  • @pangoomis
    @pangoomis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3DMark03 does work under Windows 98, you need to use 3.5.0 version, not the latest 3.6.0 version.

  • @PatrickBaptist
    @PatrickBaptist 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Back in the 939 days I had computer stores, I sold this same lanparty board in my mid-high end system, I usually went for opertron CPUs, they seem to do better than the athalons of the time, I used opertrons in all my personal stuff while people were goin nuts for the FX line as it came out, the opertron was a specially considering the price difference and they overclocked REALLY well, specially on the ABIT boards I liked.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your reply. I always felt the opterons did overclock better than the Athlons on 939, unfortunately in this clip I don't do any overclock. As for the choice of motherboard I did collect many 939 Abits as well, I think I have several variations of the AN8. But when it came to 754 and 939 (and overclock) DFI were in a league of their own, you just have to follow Oskar Wu that left Abit at the end of the socket A period and joined DFI afterwards. I love both Abit and DFI, such a shame that they are no longer in business.

  • @DD-jk3nf
    @DD-jk3nf 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But how long does it last with a full load? That's the question...

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      :)) hard to tell, I'll bet it isn't too much. The board itself was a bit of disappointment.

  • @AsurmenHandOfAsur
    @AsurmenHandOfAsur 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome setup! I have the non-Lan party version of this board. It has the normal cpu/ memory layout and just a single pci-express slot. I recapped it with polymers.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! I would recap mine as well. Can you tell me what polymer values replace what electrolytic values?

    • @AsurmenHandOfAsur
      @AsurmenHandOfAsur 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@retrodrive-thru47 They should have the same capacitance value or as close as you can. I have salvaged polymer capacitors from newer broken boards to repair retro ones and they work fine. Just have the same voltage or higher rating. Also you can buy cheap multi part testers online to check capacitance. Shelby on his channel Tech Tangents recapped an Abit BP6 dual socket 370 board with ploymer caps which was pretty awesome! He does some great other videos too!

    • @AsurmenHandOfAsur
      @AsurmenHandOfAsur 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@retrodrive-thru47 Just checked and it does have the same cpu/memory layout as the Lan Party board! I must have been thinking of a different board.

    • @AsurmenHandOfAsur
      @AsurmenHandOfAsur 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​​@@retrodrive-thru47 Just use same or similar capacitance values but same or higher voltage. I bought a pretty good cheap capcitance tester online to measure and check that the caps are within their rated value. It can also measure transitors, resistors and other components too! I have used salvaged polymer capacitors from broken newer boards and they work fine.

  • @AsurmenHandOfAsur
    @AsurmenHandOfAsur 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great camparison! Subscribed! Also maybe recap that Asus board with new or salvaged polymer capacitors.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unfortunately I don't really know the equivalence of electrolytic to polymer. I think the voltage needs to be the same or higher for the new capacitors. But I don't know about capacitance value. Cheers!

  • @lemagreengreen
    @lemagreengreen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ahh I remember this disaster. I don't actually remember seeing a first gen Pentium 4 setup, it was universally panned in the PC enthusiast press due to the lack of performance, RDRAM requirement etc.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I almost spilled my tea. But you are right this was a disaster, there were some unfortunate souls that even bought this platform I know of at least one, still it had SDRAM and a VIA chipset. :))

    • @lemagreengreen
      @lemagreengreen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@retrodrive-thru47 Yeah SDRAM made this a whole lot more palatable. I think it just came around at a terrible time for Intel too, they were pretty blindsided by the success of the Athlon.

  • @wowitsshit9734
    @wowitsshit9734 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Use geforce 4 4400

  • @hateWinVista
    @hateWinVista 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    RDRAM was such an interesting technology back then, it's so familiar yet so far away from PC business. Made Intel pay quite a ransom to migrate back to SDRAM.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It looked bulletproof back then (but it was also very expensive). I will investigate the SDRAM soon as I hope to get another motherboard.

    • @KokoroKatsura
      @KokoroKatsura 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      a n i m e n i m e

  • @JohnSmith-iu8cj
    @JohnSmith-iu8cj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And use the oldest drivers possible as they need less cpu overhead. GeForce 45.23 and below is good. For older games use oldest possible drivers. For newer games drivers a little bit after the games release.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think I used 45.23 for this one.

  • @JohnSmith-iu8cj
    @JohnSmith-iu8cj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I recommend Radeon 9800 pro. Or GeForce fx5900, 6800 or 7900. The older models have 3.3V support for the early agp slot version on old motherboard that had only 3.3V as in asus P2B.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Isn't a 9800Pro or any of the others a little bit overkill? I think I can find one that works but the P3 is out of their league and I would like to keep a minimum of realism in my benchmarks :)) I can definitely jump the horse with these graphics cards but in the end what would be the point matching parts that are so distant in time?

    • @kelpmaxxing
      @kelpmaxxing 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@retrodrive-thru47 early cards a pretty weak especially in games that use programmable pixel shaders like say doom3, or halo, which can obscure what those processors can do, I don't think it is unrealistic to use a 9800 pro/ geforce 5 or newer, people were still using p3 and early pentium 4 systems well into those eras.

    • @GraveUypo
      @GraveUypo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@retrodrive-thru47 9700PRO then. it's from 2002 so it's totally in its league. maybe a 9500pro or 9600 pro would already suffice though

  • @kelpmaxxing
    @kelpmaxxing 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would use an agp geforce 6 or 7 card, or radeon x or x1 instead if you can get your hands on one. main reason being that gpus in that era are extremely weak, and even with a geforce 7800 gtx , there will be some situations where you are gpu bottlenecked

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 7800gtx seems extreme for a P3 , I doubt i can get it working, maybe with an adapter, but even so....I can probably find a geforce 6 and try it with a p3 in a future video. Thanks.

    • @kelpmaxxing
      @kelpmaxxing 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@retrodrive-thru47 yeah finding a 7800 with the 3.3v notch is probably pretty hard, but you can find 6600s and 7600s with them fairly easily.

  • @_Tualatin_
    @_Tualatin_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What software do you use for fps monitor it's riva server statistic from msi afterburner? It's not to havy for old system like this? To take some performance?

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Usually msi afterburner(where there is a lot of info) or fraps. The system takes a performance hit, I've investigated in one of my first clips, the best retro OS... it's usually 2% for Fraps and 5-7-10% for Afterburner depending on the information displayed.

  • @AntiGrieferGames
    @AntiGrieferGames 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What games are those?

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In order, Ignition, Revolt, Need for Speed Porsche unleashed, Stunt GP and RC Cars in the first part and Return to castle Wolfenstein and Medal Of Honor Allied Assault in the second.

  • @SianaGearz
    @SianaGearz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The "P4 connector" in your video isn't a P4 connector, that's an optional 3V/5V connector. It is doubled up with the connections on the ATX connector. Processor power is supplied with the ATX12V connector, which was frequently called P4 connector. I think your board might be a little damaged and contains a break somewhere between the optional power connector and the ATX connector. I think the damage might be induced by them running the net for one of those pins in a really bad spot, between edge and ATX screw head. There's a reason nobody should be placing the ATX power socket there on that edge like they did. There are no banks on this mainboard, since it has no memory channels support. You simply fill the memory from left to right, any number of sticks, and then fill the rest with continuity modules. Nice game selection. I haven't known some of these back in the day, should definitely check them out. Software not optimised for SSE2? Well the T&L routines in the drivers should contain all specialised optimisations! SSE, 3DNow, and SSE2, though tangible advantage of SSE2 should be extremely minor. You need of course Direct3D7 or OpenGL software to make use of driver T&L but also a 3D accelerator which doesn't support hardware T&L but has drivers new enough for these optimisations sooooo... yeah.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you, that's really insightful. I knew of some asus motherboards that don't require pairs of rdram but I thought that was an exception. As for Sse2 I didn't quite mean the games(this was a failure on my part for using a weaker graphics card), the encoding program had a checkbox to use sse2 on the P4 but true enough the performance wasn't that great compared to just SSE maybe a 5-10%. (I also would expect other programs like cinebench or superpi to take advantage of sse2). Do you know of the reason why encoding was better on the P4? Was it the longer pipeline, the better prediction branch? Cheers! P.S. As for the connector I suppose there is a problem on the motherboard as some capacitor was hanging on just one leg in that area where all PSU connectors were.

    • @SianaGearz
      @SianaGearz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@retrodrive-thru47 Why Tsunami MPEG is faster on P4 even without SSE2? I can't say without profiling on both systems. But i had worked on mpeg2enc about 20 years ago and the slowest part by far was the motion vector estimation, which is just... a lot of subtractions and comparisons. A LOT OF THEM since you're checking dozens of potential matches per block, for every potential match, counting all pixels. This was the area i back then was curious in improving by mashing a SUSAN corner detector into it, which... almost worked :D i wasn't very good :D Most of the encoder is in fact not at all pipeline sensitive or prediction sensitive, merely relying on raw arithmetic throughput - i think mostly MMX if implemented. I don't actually remember that much from the era.

  • @FOIL_FRESH
    @FOIL_FRESH 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So I've got a similar system - a Gateway PC that came with 64mb RDRAM, the 1.4ghz wilamette, Geforce 2 MX and a dead SB live. I have given it a great overhaul, so now it's a 1.7ghz wilamette with a few new noctua fans on the heatsink and case vents, found another 64mb of RDRAM to fill the terminated slots, got it a working SB Live with optical audio output and because it's pretty much a beast for 2001, I found a really nice Hercules Geforce 3 ti 200. It came with Windows ME, but I've put a new 120gb SSD in it with WinXP. It's a real fun machine. BUT!! I hate the power supply. I want to get a new one, and that P4 connector is holding me back from just plugging in a new 550w. Do you know if there is any reason why I can't just splice up some molex connectors from a modern PSU into that same 6 pin connector?

    • @kenh6096
      @kenh6096 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can get a 20-Pin to ATX 20-Pin & AUX 6-Pin Cables

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm personally dealing with the same issue with PSUs. Good thing that there's an adapter for that. I didn't know it existed.

  • @tqrules01
    @tqrules01 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At the time the 800mhz P3 would beat most 1.0GHZ p4. The reason is the P3 had a shorter pipeline, allowing the register to clear faster if in error. This is why prescot and netburst is where this architecture ended and the P3 based core2duo and core2quad took over.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes reading about the differences I've come to the same conclusion, the shorter pipeline and bigger cache helps the P3 over the faster P4.

  • @Nordlicht05
    @Nordlicht05 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Played revolt on an pIII 550 with ati gpu. Ran good

  • @vine00
    @vine00 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've had one of these Socket 423 boards for ages but I don't really know what to do with it. It's still a cool piece of history. Always wanted a video comparing these to the higher end PIIIs

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'll do some more comparisons. Now I've got a SDRAM sk 423 too and I can do a proper comparison.

  • @CovenantAgentLazarus
    @CovenantAgentLazarus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was a fight between CPU cache and bus speed.

  • @CovenantAgentLazarus
    @CovenantAgentLazarus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    GeForce 4 for the next video

  • @CovenantAgentLazarus
    @CovenantAgentLazarus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the worst motherboard socket in history

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      May very well be. I has some competition from socket 8 and socket 754.

  • @myne00
    @myne00 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I believe the terminators are essentially grounded capacitors that reduce signal reflections from the dead end of the wire. Imagine you're yelling in a long, stone hallway with one door at the end and one in the middle. The person you're yelling to is in the middle room. You're both going to hear echoes from the end of the hallway, and probably misunderstand words or at least have to talk slower. Now, put a thick curtain in front of the end door. Most of the sound is going to be muffled by the curtain, and the echoes will be greatly reduced. Electrically, the terminating capacitor is the curtain, allowing the signal to be absorbed instead of reflected.

    • @SianaGearz
      @SianaGearz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Terminators isn't quite the correct name. RDRAM is a bus that is terminated on the mainboard. To fill out unused memory sockets, you use CRIMMs which are continuity only, not termination. When CRIMM are missing, the termination is of course missing as well, you get a floating far end. There can only be one set of terminators, but any number of RIMMs or CRIMMs, so this setup is more flexible. Termination is resistive, not capacitive.

    • @myne00
      @myne00 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SianaGearz oh? Please explain further. I thought they were boring old decoupling caps on a card.

    • @SianaGearz
      @SianaGearz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@myne00 CRIMM card has no soldered-on components at all, it merely connects socket's input lines to socket's output lines. RDRAM bus is connected in series from one chip to another; and when a chip is missing in the chain, you still have to make those connections to pump the data through. The RDIMM has an only 16bit narrow bus, and the socket is long due to loop through outputs. In contrast SDRAM DIMM sticks (disregarding dual channel) are all mostly connected in parallel as opposed to in series, with just a couple unique address lines per chip or stick to differentiate them. The socket's data bus width is 64 bit.

  • @Knaeckebrotsaege
    @Knaeckebrotsaege 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:21 that "one different number" is the datecode, week 5 and 8, 2002 (YYWW). Also getting RDRAM sticks is so cheap these days, there's no reason not to populate all 4 slots. 64MB modules are completely worthless, and 128MB ones aren't much more expensive. Where it gets exponentially more ridiculous is 256 and 512MB modules, or the unicorn 1GB ones that appeared so late and were so ludicrously expensive, they're almost non-existant edit: as for the caps on the Asus board, they're at least easy to replace, which is what I've done on my P4T. Runs a 2GHz P4 Willamette with 4x 256MB PC800 RDRAM just fine now. IMHO when dealing with 20+ year old PC HW, you should expect things to need maintenance, and capacitors are a wear item. More often than not they will have degraded, or worst case with cheapo ones have dried up (acting like a resistor) or leaked causing shorts and unwanted fireworks

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, it would be a good ideea to test them for resistance with a multimeter before powering on any board. I do have several 512mb pairs. I usually like to keep it a bit real and keep the memory somewhat close to what people could afford at the time. It was also a good ideea to present the terminators because I've learned some things about them from the comments. I never knew that there were 1gb modules. Cheers!

  • @Supadupanerd
    @Supadupanerd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    After seeing that a couple boards blew a cap, it would probably be wise to re-cap those boards completely, or at least replace the caps in around the power inputs/ram/cpu socket

    • @CovenantAgentLazarus
      @CovenantAgentLazarus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would think so too. Since they do the same function I would replace them all in that area, and around CPU too. I'm not really trained to identify which capacitors belong to which area that's why it would be difficult for me to identify those responsible for RAM.

    • @Supadupanerd
      @Supadupanerd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@retrodrive-thru47 really it's the larger ones around those primary system components that are doing the heavy power line filtering and supply to those components, I've fixed boards that weren't stable or didn't post before by swapping the caps around those areas

  • @CoolTI-Daniel
    @CoolTI-Daniel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yea, the Pentium4's were pretty lousy. I think the Northwood's starting to reach at least 2.53, 2.66, 2.8 were somewhat owwkaa... The 3.0, 3.2 with HT were starting to be fairly decent. During those days I had an Athlon XP 2400+ @ 2.0Ghz and I loved it. I later upgraded it to a XP 3000+ also which is about 200mhz more and a higher Bus from 233 to 333 and double l2 cash but the performance gain was negligible. Still was a decent system for it's time. Later I upgraded to a socket 939 Athlon 64 X2 3800+ which felt like an amazing upgrade.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Almost sound like my path. In 2002 I had an XP 1600+, in 2004 I upgraded to a Barton core 2800+ and in 2006 to an X2 4000+ that also felt like a major upgrade for me too.

    • @CoolTI-Daniel
      @CoolTI-Daniel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@retrodrive-thru47 quite similar indeed. I stuck with AMD for the longest time, even through their poor performers however I never cared about having the fastest, I always aimed for price/performance. After the 939 x2 3800 I upgraded to an Asus M2N-E with Nvidia Chipset. Had an Athlon X2 5200 which lasted me a while, later maxed the board to a Phenom X4 9950 (Mediocre but still a solid upgrade over the athlon) Later I got an AM3 board and went Phenom II 955 and later upgraded to FX8350 who everyone knows was flawed... but it was just a CPU drop for a significant upgrade over the 955. AMD's first low end phenom and low end FX were indeed complete trash and buggy. Like Phenom1's without the 50 at the end (Phenom 9100, 9500, 9600) or the original bulldozer fx chips

    • @GraveUypo
      @GraveUypo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i had that cpu for a while too but mine was running 2.4ghz. i literally only had to upgrade from it when team fortress 2 came out and only ran decently on core2 machines (i bought an athlon x4 before and it was trash, i kept it for like 3 months before going intel). back then the source engine was single threaded by default and there was a hacky way to enable multi core that doubled performance (mat_queue 2 on console) but it was unstable.

  • @phazonclash
    @phazonclash 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The P4 Willamette was a big pile of shit, and the Northwood "B" (no HT) wasn't much better. The Pentium 4 finally showed what it was capable of when the the Northwood "C" with Hyper-Threading and the 800MHz FSB was released. Before that, it was getting its poop pushed in badly by the Athlon XP (Remember how good the 2500+ was for the price?) I had many P4 back in the days, including the P4 "B" 2.26GHz, the P4 "B" 2.8GHz, and finally the Pentium 4 "C" 2.8GHz + HT. That one was pretty great (good overclocker too). Then came the Prescott and it was disappointing (high power usage and hard to keep cool by ~2004 standards) In hindsight, the Pentium 4 was hit-and-miss imo. The Netburst architecture had fatal flaws. The Pentium-D was a disaster. The first "Core" CPU (Nehalem) was way overdue for Intel when it came out.

    • @CovenantAgentLazarus
      @CovenantAgentLazarus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No.

    • @phazonclash
      @phazonclash 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CovenantAgentLazarus Your mom says "Yes"

    • @CovenantAgentLazarus
      @CovenantAgentLazarus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@phazonclash No.

    • @SianaGearz
      @SianaGearz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Even the "gooder" P4s were still not great. I replaced a 2.8E with an Athlon XP 3000+ and it was so much nicer to use. My pet peeve is the denorm bug, where P4 (all revisions) raises an FPU exception on too broad a range of values which don't require re-normalisation, but it thinks they might, by an order of magnitude vs. any other processor. It is particularly nasty in the earliest ones but it's still pretty bad on all of them.

    • @justincase9471
      @justincase9471 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I ran with a 2500+ Barton @3200+ for years. It was great until I needed a 64 bit CPU with SSE2/SSE3 for Darwin/Mac OSX (early hackintosh).

  • @johnrickard8512
    @johnrickard8512 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Victory for Team Red!

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      For now, I do plan to revisit this to try the 77.77 driver as it looks that it has support for the 6800 and others.

  • @kenh6096
    @kenh6096 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice video and good to see this old hardware still getting interest. I must admit I was a bit confused by the description you put on the video as the PIII and Celeron you used are Tualatin cores that are both newer and built on the newer 130nm process. The P4 in this instance are the previous generation chips so you got your self a little backward there. They essentially ran with both lines side by side improving them both at this time. The P4 you have is the old Willamette core and built on the older 180nm process. The first gen P4s were stablemates of the Coppermine based PIIIs and Celerons. For a comparison for the the same generation as your P4 the quickest P6 derived Celeron would be the Coppermine based at 766MHz and for the PIII it would be again the Coppermine based at 1133MHz. These old Willamette chips had already had their price slashed with the later P3III 1.4GHz chips quickly being priced between the 1.9GHz and 1.8GHz P4s. Incidentally the 1400MHz Celeron was not officially out until around mid 2002. These Tualatin chips you are using would have been primarily up against the Northwood P4s. Though they did cost more so perhaps if you are going for a given budget then maybe a later higher clocked socket 470 Willamette chip would have been a more period appropriate for those on a tight budget.

    • @dabombinablemi6188
      @dabombinablemi6188 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tualatin was the same as Coppermine clock for clock however. The main reason for existance at all was for Intel to trial the 130nm process. Also, Tualatin came out within 2001, the same as Willamette. Also, Intel recalled all Coppermine PIII 1133 as every single example was defective.

    • @kenh6096
      @kenh6096 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dabombinablemi6188 The PIII 1.4GHz you have there appears to be the S model. These had improved L2 cache doubling the capacity. The Tualatins all also had a more modern data prefetch management. So you do tend to see clock for clock differences than compared with the Coppermine. That PIII was released in January 2002 the day after the Northwood P4 2.2GHz. So the Northwood really was it's stablemate. The 1.4Ghz Tualatin Celeron is later still at May 2002. The Willamette P4 1.4GHz was first released back in 2000. Even these earliest Willamette P4s pre date the very first Tualatin Core PIII by about half a year. What you have done is taken the fastest PIII from 2002 and compared it to the slowest P4 from back in 2000. Your tests are still very interesting though. I wonder how that PIII would have compared with Willamette P4s at 1.9GHz and 1.8GHz as they would have probably been more price comparable to the PIII you had in their day. It would be interesting to see how the slowest 1.6GHz and fastest 2.2GHz Northwood released the same month as your PIII would compare too. It would give a good indication as to how well or bad these late PIIIs were actually doing back in their day. I Wish I had some in my collection now as you have got me interested.

    • @kkolakowski
      @kkolakowski 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought the idea was to compare three CPUs running on the same clock, to show that clock-by-clock, P4 was slower than previous generation. Which was quite unusual at the time, to say the least. At least P4 was able to run on much higher clock speeds later on.

  • @tennickjestzajety69
    @tennickjestzajety69 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Radeon 8500! ATI was powerful and just cool! #teamradeon :D

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, it's geforce 3 ti territory. It would have been a better choice for these tests.

  • @federicocatelli8785
    @federicocatelli8785 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's a CNR slot?

    • @thomasmittelwerk410
      @thomasmittelwerk410 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Communications and Networking Riser. It was supposed to be used with modems, sound cards, network cards. But, considering that more and more components started being integrated into the chipset even at the time, considering that the motherboard shown in the video has 5 PCI + 1 AGP slots, and considering that PCI peripherals dominated the market back then (there were even people still using ISA cards at the time), the CNR slot was more of a solution in search of a problem.

    • @federicocatelli8785
      @federicocatelli8785 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thomasmittelwerk410 Owned several pc compatibles since mid 90s but I've never heard of such thing...guess it was short lived and not much popular like rambus

    • @myne00
      @myne00 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @federicocatelli8785 many boards had it, few ever used it.

    • @retrodrive-thru47
      @retrodrive-thru47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Some sort of cut down PCI. Others have named it. It could be found on many motherboards around 2000, Amd or Intel. I could only see soundcards and modems for it.

  • @spg3331
    @spg3331 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    amazing video i always look forward to your content!