วีดีโอ

Thank you 😊 glad you are loving it!

I didn't get either why the video starts by mentioning that she was from one of the richest countries in Europe at the time and then mentions a lack of funds, even though war might have took a lot of that away idk

😆😆

🥰 some definitely take quite a bit more time than others!

Thank you!

Wow, that is so cool! 😀

In the clip I show, the comb is made of ivory and the image is one made of wood. 🙂

Thank you for watching! 😊 I am glad you enjoyed it 🥰

J'ai toujours aimé ce tableau, j'ai lu et vu beaucoup de choses sur lui. La théorie de la robe de mariée je n'y adhère pas. La position de ses mains (celle de la femme) est vraiment un geste que nous faisons toutes enceintes. De plus à cette époque la mode n'était pas au bouffant mais au près du corps plutôt évasé vers le bas pour les dames. Ceci dit nous ne le saurons jamais ! 😊

@@maevapaolo4020 Yes, perhaps she was pregnant. Someone also pointed out the St. Margaret on the top of a bedpole. One more strange thing was despite they were standing by each other, her face wasn't block by his shadow. Both faces contrast with luminescent from the left side of the room - either she was standing in front of him (which might mean she went further to somewhere than him), or she was supernatural and his shadow has no effect on him. I also was told with the symbols with the candles - one side on and one side off, spider web on her side, seems to me the lady in green could be like you said, pregnant, but dark side glooming on her which might mean she died already by this painting finished. Green colour - even up to 20th century, were particularly arsenic. But I guess the colour was popular everywhere in Europe as well. The unworn wooden lady's (?) slipper on his side - another woman on his side, or there was a substitute companion with him already. Also if it was in 1433, there was also a Hundred Years War going on between France and Britain. A county close by would be County of Hainaut, which they suspected would be run by a branch of Moors, which is unusual given its North location but not unusual if the Moors would stay because of trades and commerce.

Omg!!! 🙄🙄🙄 I am showing the changes, that they were able to see with xrays, that the artist had made while working on the painting! Not everyone has seen this before and some people enjoy seeing the process artist took to creat these paintings. I know it’s nothing new, i share medieval and renaissance art and history on my page and my followers enjoy it.

@historybylynny a lot of the stuff I see when science gets involved in art, and this is not your fault, it comes across to me that the researchers are trying to take credit for what the artists have done. Judging from your reply you are not that sort of person. But I have seen it happen. I have done paintings for many years and I have done drawings for many years. I have changed my mind as I do a particular piece many times. Many times it goes straight through the way I wanted it. I apologize to you if I seem to have been attacking you, but I have seen some science people step into art methods as if they know everything about it and end up convincing even a number of artists that the researchers are the ones that came up with the artists' techniques. I seldom get that feeling when artists actually do the research and write about it. Keep up the fine work you are doing, and I will be watching to learn from you. 👍

@@BryanJRiolo-q5h It's pretty rare to see someone able to apologize on the internet, cudows to that. For the researchers attributing the artist's work to themselves, honestly it wouldn't make sense in front of their peirs ? Maybe it depends on the country and small art research "milieu" considered, but I wonder it there's not a bit of projection/sensitivity on the topic coming from you too (wich is ok). To me analysing something is far from taking credit for it and it seems that it's what you fear.

@@capucnechaussonpassion14 it's not the problem necessarily with the researchers' peers. It's the people who are beginners who know virtually nothing about what they're trying to learn about techniques for example who got caught up in trying to find the easiest way to do something with as little work as possible from themselves. With some of them it is quite innocent in my opinion because very few of them really know what kind of work it takes to become what I would consider to be a creative artist. And yes I know that sounds conceited. Maybe it is, but I have found the best art comes from those who are really willing to do the research and not just take the word of somebody else who seems to be an authority. I'll give you an example of something that has disturbed me for the past 5 years or so. Years ago was a painter who worked out a method of underlying layers of paint coming up and making random designs into the top players while the layers were wet. There probably still is a video about it on TH-cam. A whole sort of cottage industry has sprung up touting a method of making abstracts with fluid acrylic paints that depends upon the specific gravity of the pigments. Artist after artist after artist talks about the specific gravity of pigments being the secret of how to make fluid paints make cells of their own in abstract paintings involving acrylics for the most part. While the method can work, it is fraught with all sorts of problems. What those problems are is that the painting will reach a certain point before it dries that looks absolutely gorgeous, but then passes through that stage then just spreads out into a muddy mush of colors usually spoiling the effect the artist was going for. It seems to me this was caused by people taking the words of researchers who've never done the art over actually trying to find the best way to do it. One of the problems with specific gravity of pigments is that most of them are too close to one another in density to really work properly. And even when you can find pigments that will work properly for your needs with this particular protocol you have to put them in a specific order, never mind what you might want to do. There's nothing wrong with using the density method, but I like to see that artists can realize there are different methods as well. But I've seen it happen too often that when a scientist gets involved too many artists think of what they say as some sort of Holy Grail. What amazes me in a good way from seeing your video is that x-rays have to be used to see the earlier work even though the artist used such thin layers. To me that verifies profoundly how good a method he developed so early in the history of being able to use oil paint and have the paint dry reasonably fast. Painting with oils was used far earlier, but was never really popular for the simple reason of how slow drying oils can be. So in spite of my sour fulminations I encourage you to keep up your good work! I learned a lot in spite of how grumpy I am about this kind of stuff. 👍

​@@historybylynny Pay no mind to the rantings of weird dudes on the internet. Lynny, you're doing a great job!

Today in 2024, no one that has both intelligence as well as common sense is going to call the Shroud of Turin a fake. Impossible.

😊

It’s a pin that belonged to Catherine de Medici! That was her monogram.

Hans Holbein