วีดีโอ

??? What do you mean exactly sir?

Yes, you can. You have to activate "Allow multiple solids in Part Design Body by default" - it is an experimental setting in the Part Design / General settings. But yes, Link Branch still has many helpful exclusive features. But (at least until the hopefully imminent merge) FreeCAD 1.0 also has a lot of things that the current build of the Link Branch doesn't have yet.

@@ferdinand9802 Thanks, I didn't know about this option in the settings. And yet it doesn't work as expected. Try extruding a large block, create a sketch on its surface. In the sketch, draw several non-intersecting circles or rectangles. Close the sketch, make an extrusion - a pocket. Free Cad will successfully create several of these holes, but you will get an error if you try to make a fillet or chamfer on the edge of one of these holes. In the Link Branch version, this works fine.

Hello! Much thanks for the suggestion! I'm considering you done your previous models in version earlier to the current (FreeCAD 1.0 it's now out as stable version), as 1.0 is considered the big game change for the CAD community maybe in this version that errors you used to find will not appear in this current version. I'm also testing the new FreeCAD 1.0, if I find issues like you mentioned a video of this model solving errors will be available indeed.

@@OffsetCAD Hi, I'm using the version 1.0, I have encountered a few errors, for example... in the first sketch I draw a rectangle of 30mm lenght by 18mm height with a circle of 5.5mm of diameter, with a distance 9 mm from the left border and a height of 9mm from the bottom line, all lines are constrained, finish the sketch, apply Pad of 8mm, then add a chamfer of 2.5mm to the circle and everything is fine, but I change the position of the circle then there is an error with the chamfer, it says border missing or something like that I don't remember the exact description... And I wonder why... there are no other geometries of objects that "colide" with the new position of the circle... It's a little confusing... jajaj sometimes I want to quit and stay with fusion 360, but for some reason I keep returning and giving freecad another chance 😁

A lot of things sir! Check this list of things from the site: wiki.freecad.org/Release_notes_1.0

fyi... I can get a similar result by removing the fillets and doing the 'thickness' operation on the 'Pad' model. Then I went into wireframe, selected the inside and outside edges and did the fillet. No error encountered doing it that way.

So thanks for trying another way of getting the same final model! Happy FreeCAD learning.

Thank you!

Thank you!

Yes! Is there a way! Inside Part workbench, select your body and then mirror tool, choose your plane, ok. The new generated object you can make it single creating a simple copy of using part tools.

@@OffsetCAD I did it thanks!

adhiero !.. muy gran labor!!! slds desde argentina!

Gracias por ver

In custom preferences I think.

@@OffsetCAD Thanks for the video!!!

Hey! See the part 2 of the video. It's another design video using the version you mentioned (FreeCAD 1.0 RC2).

@@OffsetCAD Thank you

For this particular model, I seen the PartDesign workbench would be more fast for designing the model.

Serious?

​@@OffsetCAD Yes, the situation is that bad. no one can deny that it's a great program and the programmers are working hard to improve it but python will not solve the problem, fusion 360 is more than 90% c++ and the other 10% are other languages just for the cloud and stuff like that

FreeCAD devs must improve this workbench, I took days trying to understand why the problem. I updated to the last Release Candidate to find the same tedious problem. I just give up trying to figure out. Now I'm waiting to test the model in the "stable" FreeCAD 1.0.

So this is a big setback. Python is a language that seems simple to me, that problems like these could arise in FreeCAD because of Python I did not expect.

I think it is fine to have more things in Python. Python adds immense flexibility to FreeCAD which isn't otherwise possible. A better solution, in terms of functionality & feasibility, would be to move heavy operations to C++ and only have APIs in python

I was wondering about that too... But considered that Sheet Metal is an external add-on, this was to show how to model a prototype without the add-on

Thank you! If you want so, there's a feature available in SheetMetal workbench, unfold tool.

Thank you too for watching.

So glad!

Thank you!❤️❤️❤️

Yeah, I know it. Currently I can't properly use any program which shows the entered keyboard keys.

​@@OffsetCADwhy not? This is a genuine technical question, not me trying to be pushy. I can't think of any reason that that sort of software shouldn't be working so I'm curious why you can't currently use them. (If you know that is. If they just don't seem to work for no clear reason then I'd be curious what software you've tried)

Regarding slowing the video down you should just be able to use the yt playback speed adjustment. It might make the audio sound bad but it'll do the job.

@@felixjohnson3874 that slower is not listenable. Many steps need to be shown more in detail, that s not just a question of framerate.

Glad you liked it!

You're welcome!

I updated to v1.1dev I found new problems which I'm trying to fix.