วีดีโอ

LMAOOOO

Mimic, but more fun

@@JayLaVey Like magic in darksouls, those summon things in elden ring, and in sekiro turning the audio to English so you don't have to read subs while you fight a boss.

Haven't played Gundam Breakers 4, but Im picking it up since its on sale. I've gotten into Gundam pretty heavy since I dropped this vid tbh.

I appreciate the kind words!

Zombies in Spaceland actually went hard.

Thank you! I appreciate you watching.

Also the storytelling method is just like dark souls if not even more vague as you need to do three playthroughs to get to the real story of canonical events and all three endings. Basically what they did was keep armored cores early 2000’s mission structure instead of semi open world and then they made movement faster than every single AC game, in fact I’d say in some respects it’s faster than Bloodborne. And the AC’s are scary powerful, you dodge literal lasers meaning the mechs can move Faster than Light without vaporizing the pilots and you can do so in four different directions

TLDR: AC6 is likely the 4th or 5th Fastest AC game depending on how much you value movement tech. Dodging(quick boosting) has been around longer then you think, and yes it borrows a bit to much from the Souls series. Sorry but it's not faster than every AC game(though it definitely borrows a lot from the Souls series.) While it's definitely faster than all of Gens 1-3, it pales in comparison to 4th Gen, and even 5th has a higher movement ceiling then AC6 does. For Answer is the fastest hands down, and that's without using movement techniques that break the game. Verdict Day also beats AC6 in speed, but requires more skill, both for it's unique movement systems, and building your AC. Going into Specifics: AC6 has a flatter speed curve than both 4th, and 5th gen, allowing you to get pretty fast much earlier, and having the lower speeds relatively not quite as far from the highest(at least compared to the faster games.) This is mostly due to 4 reasons. 1. ACFA, and ACVD had wider part selections due to being "expansion games" than AC6(you could carry over your AC4, and AC5 parts into their respective seques.) This offered more variety in slower heavy builds, and was further compounded in ACVD due to unique game mechanics allowing for more stationary play styles. 2. 4th, and 5th Gen have absolutely absurd movement systems. Both offering incredible movement tech to surpass their already high(or in the case of 4th Gen freakish) speed limits. 4th Gen has chain boosting allowing you to chain quick boost together for speeds surpassing Overed Boosting at times. 5th gen has the Wall kick mechanics allowing you to launch yourself off buildings, and some types of terrain, and that could be chained for absurd speeds in cities, and other maps with terrain that enabled it. 5th Gen also has the original Scan Mode shutting down weapons for drastically improved generator output. 3. 4th, and 5th Gen have a more extensive Booster system allowing you to adjust Your movement abilities in a variety of ways not found in other games. You have 4 different Boosters parts to customize. Main for vertical lift, and forward movement, Side for horizontal movement, Back for backwards movement, and Overed for Over Boosting(Assault Boosting), and in ACFA Assault Armor. Every Booster has different cost, and performance, with different Quick Boosting Stats being immensely important. 4th Gen even had the tuning system to target specific aspects of your AC, and improve them, such as turning speed, boost speed quick boost performance, and generator output. Lastly and extremely important both 4th, and 5th Gen had constant energy output unless the generator was completely depleted. This is different then AC6 as you usually have to wait at least half second for recharging to start whenever you use any energy. This wasn't the case in 4th, and 5th Gen unless you depleted your energy reserve completely, and even then the older Gens were much more forgiving. This Booster System, combined with the massive variety in parts gave you a much larger range of performance. A poorly kitted out AC in 4th Gen could easily drown on water maps, while a well built AC likely had insane movement speed, and infinite flight, with energy to spare. 5th Gen has pretty poor vertical lift, but infinite Overed boost was possible in ACVD(though it is incredibly build restrictive), and even without that high speed builds could be absolutely horrifying to fight against on most maps due to the wall jump mechanic. 4. AC6 has been simplified a bit for a newer audience while still having late game complexity to keep older fans content. Small note on Quick Boosting. It's actually been around since 3rd Gen as a Shoulder part in some games. We've had dodging for a long time, but we still don't have I-Frames.

@@bvc5320 But lore wise you must consider something, we dodge fucking laser side to side, these machines are Faster Than Light flashstepping shit without exploding or collapsing into a black hole. Mechanically you must also consider, perception. When the previous AC games came out it was locked into 30fps, now consoles get 60 max and pc can get way higher with right machine, at the time Ac 4 & 5 would seem faster because of the way our eyes can technically only perceive in 30 frames per second and we had yet to actually experience 60 frames per second. And in fact, technologically, it’s impossible for AC 4 & 5 to have been faster Mechanically. There is also the smoothness of movement to consider, AC6 has smoother movement and transition between movement making it seem slower than it actually is. Regardless it’s undoubtedly faster than bloodborne. I’ve encountered far more moments of being unable to dodge things purely because attacks come out so rapidly or because my machine is so light that the sensitivity takes a bit to adjust to.

@@bvc5320 also the parts mechanics for movement doesn’t affect as much as you’d think, it’s because instead of manually adjusting different directional boosting it’s been consolidated, want more speed in all directions, equip certain booster and lighter parts instead of the complexity of adjusting everything imaginable, something which for those not original AC fans and are instead Soulsborne fans or newcomers is not something which would have worked very well. And wall jumping may seem like it’s faster than just being able to literally fly but if you want to convince me, show me side by side footage of AC’s moving in a linear directions with timers and amount of pixels moved per second. Cause you have to consider, amount of pixels is vastly different between a 4k game and 720-1080p , in fact the difference between 1080p and 4k is exponentially higher amounts of pixels per frame. That means whatever space AC4 or 5 takes up in a mission is consolidated into smaller amounts of pixels making it look faster whilst the distances in 4k pixels with AC6 makes it seem slower because it’s more detailed

@nexuvareldari7418 I find this to be an extremely ill informed conclusion, and a rather poor argument. TLDR: Higher graphic fidelity does not equal larger map size, and in most AAA devs usually means reduction in map size. AC6 1 booster system is significantly weaker, while also lowering player ability to min max builds. AC6 Multiplayer Maps are Smaller than 4th Gen on average, and the extreme examples are worlds apart leaving AC6 in the dust. So I'll start with the simple in points. Yes the booster system was consolidated, but the effect this had was far from only simplifying the system. It took away player's ability to sacrifice some movement capabilities to improve others.in essence you can't optimize or minmax nearly as much. AC6 has the 1 booster slot. If you want the best boost speed you pick the best boost speed option, if you want the best assault boost you can handle you pick the best option for that your AC can handle. If you want a particular aspect of you boosting to be at its best, but can't fit the booster on the build you want to bad you're going to have to sacrifice another part in the build. 4th Gen IS DIFFERENT. Where in AC6 you have to compromise on another part of the build you can instead sacrifice performance on another booster. Here's some examples. Aggressives builds would consistently sacrifice their Back booster, and Overed booster for a better Main, and Side to better keep pace with an opponent, or a sniper will fully disregard forward boost speed in order to maximize their ability to back pedal, and dodge. If you really only needed the Overed Boost, and vertical lift you could sacrifice everything else just for that. Another way to put it is like this. Say in AC6 you wanted the best possible Quick Boost cool down, with the best possible Assault Boost. Now imagine you could get that at the cost of neutering your Vertical Lift, and Forward thrust. You can't do that in AC6, but you can definitely do that in 4th, and 5th Gen. Additionally 3 boosters each having their own quick boost cool downs that are not shared are significantly better than 1 booster with 1 cool down. You severely underestimating the difference in 4th to 6th Gen Quick boosting. In 4th Gen Quick Boosting was honestly more effective than Overed boosting in most scenarios for a number of reasons. 1st Overed Boosting stripped you of your PA, which everyone in 4th Gen had as a passive. It had its own energy meter, and it would recharge like EN. 2nd Quick Boosting was not only very strong, but it had additional mechanics that applied it's effects. First chain boosting. By chain boost together you could link a dide boost into a coward boost into another side boost, etc, etc. This gained a lot of speed fast, and if you built your AC properly you could maintain it for a good chunk of time. The 2nd Mechanics was called 2nd staging. You know how some FPS have trigger sensitivity for weapons? Like in MW2 if you pull the RT down far enough it'll fire your weapon without being pulled fully? 4th Gen did that with Quick boosting provided your not on an emulator using mouse and keyboard. If you fire the quick boost at that sweet spot where it triggers you'll get a bigger boost of acceleration, and there are other benefits to, but chain boosting with 2nd staging let you reach ludicrous speeds. Now with booster mechanics out of the way, I'm calling BS on the graphics. The higher pixel count doesn't effectively inflate size it allows developers to cram more detail into the same area. You can play AC6 in 1080p, 4k, or the lower settings, doesn't matter the game maps are the same size, but the picture quality is different. Colors pop out more, more details become more apparent, and cool effects may become more noticeable, but at the end of the day it's still the same game. The only thing graphics have enabled are better looking games, and with most studios that comes at the cost of scale. Fromsoft is one of the few rare exceptions. Let's go over distance. It's been a while since I've played online in AC6, but the majority of online Maps are all on the smaller to medium side, and it can take a bit of time to cross the larger maps. Not an incredible amount of time, but a bit. The average map on 4th Gen is bigger than the larger maps in 6th. The 2nd-4th largest in ACFA could probably fit 3-4 medium maps from 6 in it, and in an 8 man free for all you could easily host 4 1v1s and have space left over. You would still see the other players occasionally when they accidentally launched themselves into another group's spot, but you had plenty of space. Oh and that is strictly speaking horizontal space. Adding in vertical, and you could probably host 8 1v1s on the 4th largest map if the game had allowed that many players. Also note, that's the 2nd-4th largest maps. The first being the cradle map, was even bigger, and I once lost track of a friend in that one because of its size. Also didn't help it in the air, has few useful landmarks, and you can die if you fallout of the combat zone. The 2nd largest map I could cross in about 10-20 seconds,(depending on the regulation) with my fastest build. Let that sink in. Now keep in mind this was a light weight quad blader build with back mounted auxiliary booster to further enhance it's quick boost. It was built for speed. Its blade lunge makes the laser lance look not only sluggish, but short ranged, and unlike the lance this thing is energy efficient. Especially if I chained boost, and 2nd staged into a blade attack. On infinite energy regs I could reliably start an attack about a third of the map away, hit a friend, then before they recovered, I could retreat to about half a map away. On more normal Regs the speed was toned down, but doing something like that from about a quarter map distance was feasible if I could either break lock on or bait an attack(otherwise it was 50/50 as nobody was standing still.) Point being the speed was insane.

lmaooo. Stoked to finally play that one too.

Loving it. Thanks for watching!

Ac4 has fans but I personally rank it at the bottom of AC games for me. FA is, like, the fan favorite. Not my favorite, that would go to VD and AC6

@@RippahRooJizah thats fair