วีดีโอ

Thank you for opening the way for this recognitive apprehension.

This is very relevant and helpful,... It happened to me 20yrs ago, permanently changed me, you cross over from believing to knowing, but then after, how to go on in life in the world as this person with this karmic bag? 🙏Siva Sivam

Thank you, this is elucidation!

ఎంత బాగా పాడావో తెలుసా....అలానే, నీ పాదపద్మాలమీద వ్రాలి పోవాలని ఉంది. 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

🙏 Thank you very much! 🙏

ॐ नमो नारायणाय।

🙏

Clearly he hasn’t read Durga Saptashati to claim ma kali isn’t associated with war. Vagueness is what rules the internet.

There should be duality. In the Bhagavat Purana the place were the demon king Bali resides is Sutala, it's the 5th Loka counted from below. Indras place is also the 5th counted from above. Also Bali will become the next Indra, after the current manvantara ends. But Bali can't really be called asura, because he surrendered to Vamana avatar.

నువ్వు వినిపించిన ఈ ఏడు కృతులు అద్భుతం. ఇవి రోజూ నేను ఉదయం, సాయంత్రం వింటూవుంటే ఎంతో ప్రశాంతంగా ఉంటోంది. చాలాబాగా భక్తితో ఆలపించావు. ఎప్పటికి కృతజ్ఞతలు. శివశ్రీ..... 🍒🍒🍎🍎🌹🌹🌹🌹🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

Namaste🙏🏽 I know the Vedas are boring but could you please discuss the Asuras in the Rig Veda that are worshipped as deities like Varuna. I sense Demons are shape shifters and can take the form of ASURAS or GANAS. I kindly ask of you to please discuss the similarities and differences of the two and elaborate on Demons taking either form. 🙏🏽🕉️☮️

Thoughts surfaces on their own only with the bessings of the Mother....and we truly believein them...thanks a lot🙏

The story is so cute; mahisha trusts Durga's anugraha 💌

The best story teller ever ❤

55:00

Manusia in Bahasa Melayu is Human.

jyotsnābhāṃ haimavarṇāmupamitirahitāṃ kalpayitvā kathañcit| tantrīṃ vā pustakaṃ vā kathamapi dadhatīṃ nādabindvādibhūtām|| vāgdevīṃ vāgatītāmapi sakalaguṇātītasaccitsvarūpām| vande nirbhinnarūpāmapi mama hṛdayaṃ nityamāhlādayantīṃ ll sattvānāṃ codayitrī dhiyamavatu sadā pāvakā vṛtrahantrī| cetantī jīvitānāṃ sukṛtibhiraniśaṃ prārthitā brahmarūpā || aiṃ aiṃ aiṃ vāgbhavākhyā navajaladanibhā pāśahastāṅṅkuśāḍhyā| lokānāṃ bhūtidā syānnikhilabhayaharā bhāratī nīlavarṇā ll keciccinmātrarūpāmahami pariṇatāmādimāṃ bhedabhūmim| anye vāṇīsvarūpāṃ praṇavapariṇatāmṛgyajuḥsāmabhūtām|| vidyāṃ dhyāyanti dhanyāḥ paramakaruṇayā rājate’smatkṛte sā| vāgdevī mātṛrūpā śiśuhaṭhavaśagā nityapīyūṣavarṣā ll kastūrīṃ śubhrapadmānmalayajamamṛtaṃ dīpavarti prakalpya | tvāṃ stotuṃ ramyaśabdaiḥ stutirapi racitā śārade bhaktipūrā || romāñcaiḥ svedapūrairvigalitavacanairaśrubhirbaddhadṛṣṭyā | stabdho’haṃ vāṅgayī tvaṃ vitaratu karuṇāṃ tvaṃ yataḥ pūjitā syāḥ ll

Poo

Hearing Ācārya Dr. Sthaneshwar Timalsina talking is always a pleasure, but this particular one bought me to tears. Thank you, tremendously. Also, I love your food metaphors, they are the best!

hi! can someone please link the book he mentions

marvelous. this should be on spotify too

🎉 One bright side of tech - in another life, I would have no chance to see and hear a great practitioner and Acarya of this calibre. Thanks for uploading!

As per SriSankara Maya means not an illusion .They have translated wrongly as illusion.But you can refer to his definition in his 2/1/14.Sutrabhashya where he defines it as Shakti name and form(नामरूप) प्रक्रृति (premordial Nature)Maya as you can't say it as Absolute and at the same time not other than Absolute independently as waves to water. Finally my suggestion is as you said earlier to go to orinal texts of Agamas to know correctly what Agamas are telling so too go to original Sankrara bashyas and learn the teachings under a अनुभावि who is apt in giving correct purport of the texts and bhashya on them. Don't study who says "thus speaks Sankra " and judge Srisamkara .There are so many mis conceptions about Srisamkara.

You are saying the world is real and even while enjoying it you can get Enlightenment or Shivahood or any name you give.One seems to missing that the body mind complex also comes under the heading world .Whenbody also real and you suggest enjoy the world one is considering the world as real and enjoying fully already.Where is the place for AGAMA when it says the samething.Why should one strive for Shivahood which is not in his experience instead of enjoying the world?And finally who knows that Shiva really delivered Agamas?You may question the same thing regarding Vedas.But here lies the greatness of Sri Sankara he proclaims daringly that keeping this seeming combination of Self and notself which is called Avidya all the Sastras not only both emperical and religious but also the sastras that recommend Liberation also.For that only the Upanishad proclaims "अत्र वेदान्तवेद्याय भवन्ति here when one recognizes his true nature even Vedas merge in his Absolute nature..So the final judge is your own अनुभव. But we consider Vedas as valid means because it is given by God but it doesn't go against your experience. न हि वेदोक्तकर्मनिर्मुक्तान्विप्रैश्च वेदःप्रणामत्वमीह इष्यते ।किं तु अमानित्व हेतूनां वेदवाक्येषु असंभवात्।we don't consider Vedas as valid only due to they are Vedas but they won't contain any words that are invalid " says SriSureswara a desciple of Sri Sankara.That is the glory of Sankra Vedanta which asks to apply one's own experience अनुभव without taking any other authority as means to recognize the Truth the Absolute!OM!

🙏

Please make this a lyrical video ❤

Sri Sankara says "Who is saying that Shiva is the Ultimate and Shakti through which He remaing in his own glory manifests himself as the world etc all these You are saying.Who is this I that is telling all these things? ..So know who you are first.You are a seemingly combination of yourself and not self in this present state.Descriminate what is change less and what is ever changing.After Recognizing yourself you come to know that what you rejected as notself also nothing but you. There is nothing to keep or reject anything because there is nothing second entity other than you.आत्मौवेदं सर्वम् ।I am everything. OM!

Thats a interesting session. Pranam Guru 🙏

Does not Vedanta say दृष्टिं ज्ञानमयीं कृत्वा पश्येत् ब्रह्ममयं जगत्?That is the defect is with your looking at the world.. not with the world.But one is in present state totally engulfed in the world taking it as real as a first step vedanta says the world is not real as you see but it is nothing but Brahman.Then one tries to know what is Brahman. Then the teaching declares you are that and it shows the WAY how to recognize the truth!This is simplified vedanta.You are also telling so many Upayas to remove Malas.If malas are REAL they can never able to be removed because they are REAL.And who has to do upayas ?Jeeva you say .Why Shiva became jeeva?You say it is His इच्छा .Why all this confusion at all?And so many such questions! Pranams!

Pranams !Why at all these raga dwesha and Ajnana? Malas at all?

😃 Thank you so much for your teachings! 😃

Sadar pranams acharyaji..shree mathre namaha

🙏🏼

Merci Acharya Dr. Sthaneshwar Timalsina ...bows of gratitude🙏🤎

He is not buddha he is Siddha ( siddhartha) 🙏☀️ please everyone call him by his real name Siddhartha

Such a wonderful speech Acharyaji 🔱

thank you for sharing

🙏🙏🙏

Very informative! 🙏

الحمدلله على نعمة الاسلام والعقل

As a scholar working on sakta tantra someday I am looking forward to speaking in this big platform ❤

nāsadvā sadyadapi paramaṃ veda vā tanna veda। yatsatyaṃ tanna khalu kuśalaiśchidyate tarkabāṇaiḥ ॥ dvaitādvaitādyakhilamatibhiryatpadaṃ sevyate tat। vande cetovilayanilayaṃ śāradāpādapadmam॥1|| sāṃkhyaṃ yogaṃ paśupatimataṃ vaiṣṇavaṃ vā yatheccham। cārvākaṃ vā bhavatu hṛdayāhlādakaṃ sajjanānām ॥ yatsatyaṃ tatpramitipathagaṃ svaprakāśaṃ vareṇyam। dadyācchaukhyaṃ jagati sakalaṃ darśanaṃ śāradāyā ॥2||

🙏🏾

Ye Sambad yahi hindi ya Sanskrit me rahta hai ham jaise logo ko bahut help milta

Divine 🙏

Shiva Shiva 😊😊😊

Very beautiful composition, very melodious and blissful voice Sivasri

I love this answer, it does make us see how transcendental this subject is, and how we often are tied to a very limited perception in what the word is. :) Thank you as always! 🩷

We asked for lalitha devi not chamunda devi.

Sadar pranams acharyaji..